Answer:
Grammar mistake: Faulty parallelism
Corrected sentence: "Law firms and corporations may employ paralegals to perform tasks previously performed by lawyers because their time is charged at lower rates."
Grammar mistake: Wordiness
Corrected sentence: "Paralegals may be asked to conduct legal research and review case and statutory materials for clients who want to save money and have questions about legal problems."
No grammar mistake. The sentence is grammatically correct as is.
Grammar mistake: Lack of parallel structure
Corrected sentence: "Try this schedule: shower, eat breakfast, drive to the train, go to work, and then come home."
Grammar mistake: Word choice
Corrected sentence: "The prosecutor will try to convince you during the trial that the defendant committed the crime."
Grammar mistake: Lack of parallel structure
Corrected sentence: "The content of Walter Mondale's speeches is more similar to that of Jimmy Carter."
Explanation:
What are the four layers of the federal court system?
District courts, the Supreme Court, magistrate courts, and appellate courts make up the federal court system's four levels.
Federal courts examine matters involving the validity of statutes, laws, and treaties signed by American diplomats and public officials, disputes between two or more states, admiralty law, sometimes known as maritime law, and bankruptcy proceedings.
Federal courts can only consider things that are specifically permitted by the US Constitution or federal legislation since they only have limited jurisdiction. A case must be brought in federal district court if it arises from federal law, the Constitution, or a treaty.
The federal court process is more streamlined and frequently moves more swiftly than state courts.
Electronic filing is cost-effective in all federal courts, but not all state courts.
To learn more about federal court system visit;
brainly.com/question/11893658
#SPJ4
A person has been using a portion of their neighbor's land for years as a parking space, but
the neighbor now wants to sell the property to a developer. What legal action can the
person take to secure their right to park on the land?
Homeowners have the legal right to keep intruders off their property. People can do this by erecting fences, posting signs, or simply asking trespassers to leave. This is also known as an easement.
What is easement?An easement is a nonpossessory right to use and/or enter another's real property without owning it. It is best exemplified by the right of way that one landowner, A, may have over the land of another, B. In most jurisdictions, an easement is a property right and type of incorporeal property in and of itself.
A landowner can call the police in cases of serious, repeated annoyance or threatened harm, and the police will usually warn the person to stay away and, if necessary, make an arrest.
Therefore, the person can charged of easement for using a portion of their neighbor's land for years as a parking space.
To learn more about easement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13059197
#SPJ9
2. Pilihan ganda30 detik1 ptQ. Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the ConstitutionPilihan jawabanmade states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
Option 3 is Correct. The creation of a strong national executive by the Constitution of 1787 as opposed to a dominant national legislature by the Articles of Confederation was the key distinction between the two documents.
In the end, the biggest difference between America's two founding documents is that under the Articles, state sovereignty predominated, whereas under the Constitution, after it was approved, the federal government's authority was greatly expanded.
The most significant distinction between these two treaties was that whereas the Constitution established a powerful central authority, the Articles of Confederation provided a central government relatively limited power. The Declaration of Independence served as a justification for leaving a government. A government was intended to be established by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Constitution Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the Constitution
answer choices
1. made states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.
2. was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.
3. created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.
4. provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
Which amendment to the Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to all citizens. A 1st Amendment B 5th Amendment C 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment of the Constitution guarantees equal protection and due process to all citizens.
On June 8, 1866, the Senate passed the Fourteenth Amendment, granting citizenship to all people—including former slaves who were born or naturalised in the country—and extending the Bill of Rights' protections to the states. Also, it promised "equal protection under the law" for all residents.
The 14th Amendment made it illegal for former Confederate governments to make payments to former slave owners in order to settle their war debts and make up for the freeing of their slave populations. Lastly, it granted Congress the power to implement this amendment; This provision set the stage for the passage of other important pieces of 20th-century legislation, including the 1965 Rights Act and the 1964 Voting Rights Act.
To learn more about 14th Amendment, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29793577
#SPJ4
Who was the designated survivor for the State of the Union?
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg was the selected survivor for the 2021 State of the Union address.
To guarantee the continuation of government in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, the designated survivor is a member of the president's cabinet who is not present during the State of the Union speech.
The president's cabinet member who is not a member of the president's political party is often chosen to be the designated survivor. The chosen survivor is brought to a secret location, where they stay until the conclusion of the address.
To learn more about catastrophic event link is here
brainly.com/question/30634248
#SPJ4
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote
The implementation of the antitrust laws has been made by the government in order to lead a promotion of competition in the markets.
The antitrust laws are the laws that are brought into enforcement in order to bring regulations of competitiveness among the sellers in the market during a given particular period of time in an economy. In fact, the entire construction of these laws has been built around the regulations related to the market competition, and provides protection against unfair advantages to the sellers.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ4
Complete question
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote ______
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the ______________
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the relative ages of rock strata, or layers.
Superposition is one of the basis of science of geology, the major principle of stratigraphy stating the layers of the sediment placed in accordance with their age. The law of superposition is based on theory that the youngest rock are always on top and the oldest rock always lies in the bottom. Using this principle, geologists were able to determine which rock layers were the oldest long before the technology existed to calculate the absolute ages of rocks. This principle was considered a great milestone in the field of geology propounded by geologist Nicolaus Steno in the 16th century.
To know more about "law of superposition" visit-
brainly.com/question/12493909
#SPJ4
what did passage of the seventeenth amendment entail?
The passage of the seventeenth amendment entails the election of U.S. senators by popular votes.
The seventeenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution establishes the direct election of the United State senators for each state. The 17th amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators of the states were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held. The amendment was proposed by the 62nd congress in the year 1912 and it became the part of the constitution on 1913, April 8 on ratification by three quarters of the state legislatures.
To know more about "seventeenth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/8813331
#SPJ4
The plaintiff, a State N citizen, properly invokes a State M federal court's diversity jurisdiction in a tort suit against the defendant, an airplane manufacturer based in State M. The plaintiff credibly alleges that he was severely injured when the defendant's airplane crashed as a result of an improperly installed engine part. During discovery, the plaintiff learns that an employee of the defendant who installed engine parts at the time the plane was manufactured was an alcoholic whose drinking may have impaired his work. The defendant fired the employee before the plane crash that injured the plaintiff. What discovery device may the plaintiff use to obtain more information from the former employee?
A
An oral deposition.
B
An interrogatory.
C
A physical examination.
D
A request for admission.
The discovery device that the plaintiff may use to obtain more information from the former employee is an "oral deposition."
An oral deposition is a discovery method in which one party (in this case, the plaintiff) questions the other party or a witness (in this case, the defendant's former employee) under oath, while a court reporter records the questions and replies. The plaintiff might utilise the oral deposition to interrogate the former employee about his alcohol consumption and whether it interfered with his work when he installed engine parts for the defendant. The plaintiff may also ask the former employee further questions about the situation.
Interrogatories are written questions sent from one side to the other, but a physical examination involves a physical examination of a person.
For such more question on plaintiff:
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ4
If you were being interrogated by police detectives, do you think it is appropriate for them to lie to you to get to the truthPlease be detailed in your response
Answer:
The police can legally lie to you to get during an interrogation and young people are especially vulnerable to their tactics. In my opinion, I don't think it's appropriate for them to lie to you because when people are brought in for questioning by the police, they're expected to tell the truth. Most people would assume that the police must also be truthful during interrogations, but the reality is that the police can lie to you during an interrogation. I just don't think it's fair.
Explanation:
federal inmates are required to serve what percentage of their sentences
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences.
A federal prison refers to a prison which is operated under the jurisdiction of a federal government as opposed to a state or provincial body. Hence, federal inmates are the inmates incarcerated in a federal prison convicted for violating federal law and for inmates who are considered dangerous or sentenced to longer terms of imprisonment.
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences. This means that if an inmate is sentenced to 10 years in prison, they must serve at least 8.5 years before being eligible for release. This requirement is set by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which are designed to ensure that all federal inmates serve a consistent percentage of their sentences. The goal of this requirement is to promote fairness and consistency in the federal criminal justice system.
Learn more about Federal Sentencing Guidelines:
https://brainly.com/question/28156579
#SPJ11
T or F: The lands and grooves of a barrel's rifling improve the accuracy of a bullet
The lands and grooves of a rifling barrel are really helpful in improving the accuracy levels of the bullets by a greater margin more often than not. Therefore, the given statement is to be held as true.
It is very much appropriate to be mentioning about the accuracy of a barrel to depend upon the rifling and lands and grooves for a précised bullet being fired from a rifle. The caliber of the gun is the most indispensable part that determines the accuracy of any gun over a prolonged period of time.
Learn more about accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29466313
#SPJ4
In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle class urban reformers. True/False?
The given statement "In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle-class urban reformers" is true.
Progressives were a diverse group of reformers who were primarily middle-class urbanites. They sought to address the social and economic problems caused by rapid industrialization and urbanization during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Many progressives believed that the government could and should play a more active role in regulating the economy and society, and they advocated for a variety of reforms, such as workers' rights, women's suffrage, and government regulation of big business.
In contrast, labor advocates and farm advocates were generally focused on more specific issues affecting their respective groups. Labor advocates, for example, focused on improving working conditions and wages for industrial workers, while farm advocates sought to address the economic challenges faced by farmers.
While there was some overlap between these groups and the progressive movement, the progressives tended to take a broader view of the issues facing American society and were less narrowly focused on specific interest groups.
To know more about middle-class urban reformers here:
https://brainly.com/question/30708982
#SPJ4
Which U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power? a. Fourth b. Sixth c. Tenth d. Fourteenth.
The tenth U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power.
What is plenary power?
According to US constitutional law, plenary power is one that has been granted to an entity or individual in full, without being subject to scrutiny or restrictions on how it may be used. When a plenary authority is given to one body, all other bodies lose their ability to use it if they are not otherwise entitled. Judicial review of plenary powers is not permitted, either in a specific situation or generally.
Due to the nature of the Constitution, which assigns distinct but occasionally overlapping functions to the three parts of the federal government and the states, there are very few glaring examples of such powers in the United States.
To learn more about plenary power visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30653314
#SPJ4
the chief justice of the supreme court who ruled in favor of the cherokee nation was...
John Marshall served as the chief justice of the supreme court and delivered the decision that favored the Cherokee people.
This so-called "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation was led by longtime Cherokee political figure Major Ridge. The bulk of Cherokees opposed to relocation were led by John Ross, the senior chief of the Cherokee people. John Ross served as the principal chief of the Cherokee People for about forty years, during which time the tribe experienced some of its most turbulent times.
He is best known for serving as the Cherokees' chief during the intense factional fighting over the decision to move to Indian Territory in the 1830s (Oklahoma). Georgia, the Cherokee Nation was declared to be sovereign by the US Supreme Court.
Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390
#SPJ4
Answer:
John Marshall
M1 Analyse the
relationship between
ethics and the law in
terms of their relevance
to own professional
responsibilities as a
health or care
practitioner
Law and ethics in medicine both rest on the principles of self-determination, beneficence, and a concept of justice to be provided to all patients by both medical professionals and society.
Why do healthcare professionals in their line of work have a legal and ethical responsibility?Healthcare professionals have a legal and ethical responsibility to safeguard the individuals they look after. Patients suffer if these obligations are neglected. Healthcare practitioners could potentially face consequences for similar behaviours. Doing what is right for the patient is an example of ethical behaviour or obligation. Practitioners are obligated to abide by the codes of ethics for many healthcare professions.
Thus there is a close relationship between laws and ethics in healthcare workers to protect the patients and prevent the dismantling of the system.
Learn more about ethics, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ9
what term is used to describe an employment practice that lacks discriminatory content but still leads to discrimination?
does a misdemeanor disqualify you from the military
Yes, a misdemeanor can disqualify you from the military.
Misdemeanor is a wrong done by a person, a crime that is not very serious in nature. Punishment provided under such acts are also very minimal such as penalty or fines. These crimes are civil in nature and doesn't involve any injury or harm to human life. A person could face an involuntary administrative discharge based on a civilian conviction, or other civilian court outcome that is considered to be conviction. And military career could be ended by a civilian criminal conviction even if it is only a misdemeanor. It can be used as measure to judge a person behavior in public which can affects a person's carrier in military.
To know more about "misdemeanor" visit-
brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ4
A tenant properly filed a complaint under state law against his landlord in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that the landlord's negligence in failing to repair the stairs in a common area of the apartment building resulted in the tenant falling and sustaining significant injuries. After the landlord served his answer, the tenant moved for summary judgment. In support of his motion, the tenant submitted affidavits from three other tenants in which each stated that she had told the landlord prior to the accident that the stairs needed to be fixed. In opposition to the motion, the landlord submitted an affidavit from the maintenance worker employed by the landlord, stating that the stairs were in good condition on the day of the tenant's accident.
How should the court rule on the motion for summary judgment?
In the situation portrayed above, it may be stated that the court will grant the motion in the interest of the plaintiff, i.e., the tenant.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints against their landlords, the tenants usually have an upper hand in getting the motion granted by the court in their favors more often than not. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
what should you do when you are going to enter a roadway from a private road
When you are going to enter aroadway from a private road, you should first come to a complete stop before the sidewalk or, if there is no sidewalk, before the roadway itself. You should then look both ways and yield the right-of-way to any pedestrians or vehicles that are already on the roadway. Once it is safe to do so, you can then proceed onto the roadway.
It is important to remember that vehicles on the roadway have the right-of-way and you should always yield to them when entering from a private road. This will help prevent accidents and ensure the safety of all road users.
In summary, when entering a roadway from a private road, you should stop, look both ways, and yield the right-of-way to any pedestrians or vehicles already on the roadway before proceeding.
Read more about aroadway here:https://brainly.com/question/28141330
#SPJ11
When entering a roadway from a private road, you should stop, yield to oncoming traffic, and merge smoothly into the traffic flow.
Explanation:When you are going to enter a roadway from a private road, there are a few important steps to follow:
Stop at the edge of the roadway and look both ways for oncoming traffic.Yield the right of way to vehicles already on the roadway.When it is safe, use your turn signal and merge smoothly into traffic.Remember to always be cautious, obey traffic laws, and yield to other vehicles to ensure a safe and smooth entry onto the roadway.
Learn more about Entering a roadway from a private road here:https://brainly.com/question/10561336
an attorney making an opening statement might typically include___.
Typically, an opening statement by an attorney will include a concise summary of the relevant facts and supporting documentation.
A brief explanation of the relevant law and a request for a verdict is typically included in an opening statement. The lawyer describes the requested verdict in the motion for the verdict as well as the supporting evidence. An effective opening statement acts as the trial's route map.
Each side's attorneys are given the opportunity to introduce themselves and the other parties engaged in the case during opening comments. In order to help the jury comprehend the evidence that will be given during the trial, attorneys typically summarise the key details of the case during the opening statement.
To learn more about opening statement visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10956209
#SPJ4
Japan would restrict emmigration of laborers to the US is part of what agreement?
Japan would restrict immigration of laborers to the US is part of Gentlemen's Agreement.
The Gentlemen's Agreement was a series of informal and nonbinding agreement between japan and the United State in the year 1907 under which Japanese government agreed to voluntarily restrict issuing passports for immigration, good for the continental United States to laborers while the US government promised to protect the rights of Japanese immigrants and their children already residing in the United States. The major aim of the agreement was to calm down immigration issues and war like conditions between the two countries. However, it was later nullified due to criticism from public by the US Immigration Act 1924.
To know more about "Gentlemen's Agreement" visit-
brainly.com/question/13876722
#SPJ4
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
If you deposit a fake check, you could be held liable for the money on it. You can also be responsible for any losses the bank incurs as a result of your deposit.
What Happens If A Fake Check Is Accidentally Deposited?
If you have a bank account, an overdraft fee may probably be charged. The bank will charge you for the amount the fake check overdrew. An overdraft may cost hundreds of dollars.You might lose your job if this causes you to be fired.It will affect your credit history when you're ready to apply for new loans and mortgages.You may also be required to pay back the person who wrote the check if they lost money as a result of your depositing a fake check into their account. Restitution might be expensive to repay in order to repair the relationship with that person.To learn more about overdraft fees visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1739416
#SPJ4
what is the system where the national government shares power with state governments?
Federalism is the system where the national government shares power with state governments.
Federalism is the system of government which divides the power or responsibilities of statutes between the center and the state or other regional bodies. Federalism guarantees sovereignty and in United States both the center and the state enjoy sovereignty. All these power are conferred to the government by the constitution itself, the constitution also protects these divisions from the legislature in order to maintain harmony and proper distribution of powers at all levels of the government. The three branches of the government the legislature, executive and the judiciary work with division of powers and each of these branches are governed by the constitution.
To know more about "Federalism" visit-
brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
A plaintiff bringing an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit must prove the defendant's action. (True or False)
True, a plaintiff bringing an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit must prove the defendant's action.
In order to successfully bring a lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, that the actions caused the plaintiff's emotional distress, and that the emotional distress was severe. Without proving these elements, the plaintiff's lawsuit will not be successful.
To successfully bring anointment onal infliction of emotional distress lawsuit, a plaintiff must generally prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, and that they caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant intended to cause emotional distress or recklessly disregarded the high True.
To successfully bring an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit, a plaintiff must generally prove that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, and that they caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant intended to cause emotional distress or recklessly disregarded the high probability that their actions would cause such distress. In other words, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's action was intentional, and that it resulted in emotional distress for the plaintiff.
that their actions would cause such distress. In other words, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's action was intentional, and that it resulted in emotional distress for the plaintiff.
Read more about infliction here:https://brainly.com/question/13948475
#SPJ11
Tarek is single and has an adjusted gross income of $37,059. He claims one
exemption of $12,400. What is his tax due?
Use the table below to help you answer this question.
Tarek's tax due is given as $3200
How to solve for the tax dueTo determine Tarek's tax due, we need to calculate his taxable income, then use the tax tables or a tax calculator to find the amount of tax owed.
First, let's calculate his taxable income:
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) $37,059
Less: Personal exemption ($12,400)
Taxable Income $24,659
Next, we can use the tax tables for the 2021 tax year to find the amount of tax owed. Based on the taxable income of $24,659 and the tax tables for the 2021 tax year, Tarek's tax due would be approximately $3,206.
Read more on taxes here:https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Controversy surrounding the Affordable Care Act is an example of the friction inherent in___.
a.confederal systems.
b.unitary systems.
c.federalism.
d.cooperative
The controversy surrounding the Affordable Care Act is an example of the friction inherent in federalism.
What is federalism?
Federalism is a combination and compound form of governance that divides the authorities between a general administration (the central or "federal") and regional governments (provincial, state, cantonal, territorial, or other sub-unit governments) within a single political system. In the unions of states under the Old Swiss Confederacy, federalism as it is known now was first practiced. Federalism is distinct from both devolution within a unitary state, in which the regional level of government is subservient to the general level, and confederalism, in which the general level of government is subordinate to the regional level.
To learn more about federalism visit;
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
why does the constitution give implied powers to congress?
Due to precedents established by other authorities, it is assumed that these will be granted. Any given governmental body can't function without these implied powers.
What are implied powers?
Implied powers are those that the federal government of the United States assumes but which are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Particularly, implicit powers are those that Congress may use but which are not expressly stated in the constitution of the country. Although not expressly stated in the Constitution, Congress may use whatever authorities deemed "necessary and proper" to carry out its specific duties. The United States Constitution's Article 1 is the source of the majority of these implied powers. In other words, this power gives Congress the ability to effectively lead the country as it develops. This clause was incorporated by the Constitution's initial drafters to let the government's authority evolve through time.
To learn more about implied powers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27728796
#SPJ4
a system that distributes power between state and national governments is called____.
A consumer filed a products liability action against a manufacturer in federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. Prior to trial, the manufacturer filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony by an expert on the consumer's witness list on the grounds that it was based on subjective belief and unsupported speculation. After holding a hearing, the judge granted the manufacturer's motion. Because of this ruling and the consumer's inability to produce other evidence in support of her case, the judge granted the manufacturer's subsequent motion for summary judgment. The consumer appealed the judgment, contending that the district court judge had erroneously excluded the testimony of the consumer's expert.
In reviewing this challenge to the trial court's ruling, what standard should the appellate court apply?
Abuse of discretion, because the judge had made an evidentiary ruling.
Absence of a genuine dispute and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, because the ruling affected the summary judgment motion.
A preponderance of the evidence, because the ruling was outcome determinative.
Clearly erroneous, because the ruling was made by the judge.
According to the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the standard of abuse of discretion should be applied by the appellate court in the review of the challenge to the trial court's ruling being made. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The abuse of discretion may be taken into interpretation as the breach of law wherein an individual misuses the power of discretion in his or her hands, in order to use them for gaining personal benefits, or with the primary intentions of a guilty mind being portrayed by the user.
Learn more about abuse here:
https://brainly.com/question/19713181
#SPJ4
