The rules are set in the following manner:
State Department of Motor Vehicles
sets rules to assure that driver and vehicle standards are met
State and local law enforcement agencies
Ensure that the laws are obeyed
federal, state, and local governments
Enforce the national guidelines which make up the vehicle code
Courts (judicial)
Decide whether drivers charged with violating the laws are guilty and innocent
highway traffic engineers
plan, build, and maintain the complex system of roadways
Road safety management is the process of recognizing safety issues, coming up with potential solutions, and choosing and putting those solutions into practice. Proactively seeking solutions to solve safety issues before they emerge, effective safety management. To ascertain the nature of the issues with road safety and the most effective ways to address them, high-quality safety data should be employed.
Learn more about Road-safety management here:
https://brainly.com/question/31708525
#SPJ12
The brave men living and dead who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. Lincoln uses this moment to help the country make sense of the severe loss of life.
A group unhappy with the draft distributes a memo to members encouraging physical confrontations with draft agents. The leaders of the group are promptly arrested. Which of the following Supreme Court cases best justifies the actions taken by law enforcement in this scenario?
A. Schneck v. US
B. Wisconson v. Yoder
C. Mapp v. OH
D. Brandenburg v. OH
The largely unsubstantiated fear that ______ was important in building support for federal drug control laws among Southern senators and congressmen in the US despite their opposition to increasing federalism. a) opium smoking was being popularized by Chinese workers
b) heroin was actually a potent habit-forming drug
c) cocaine use was responsible for an increase in violent crimes
d) morphine was inexpensive and readily available
The largely unsubstantiated fear that morphine was inexpensive was important in building support for federal drug control laws. Then it quickly became clear.
d) morphine was inexpensive and readily available
In a political system known as cooperative federalism, it is unclear where the duties and powers of the federal and state governments begin and end. In a system known as dual federalism, the roles and powers of the federal and state governments are explicitly established.
The strict Dual Federalist framework divides authority between the federal and state governments. Additionally, it encourages competitiveness while respecting each party's right to self-determination in their own domains. A vertical power arrangement between the federal and state governments, cooperative federalism is more adaptable and encourages cooperation.
Learn more about federalism
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
what did the democratic nations do in response
A democratic country has a system of government that gives citizens the power to shape public policies. Every democracy is unique and operates in a distinctive way.
Voting on proposed laws and policies allows individuals in various democracies to directly influence decision-making (direct democracy).Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of expression, inclusivity and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from arbitrary state deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights are frequently characteristics of democracies. Those in charge of a democratic nation, government, or political system are chosen by the electorate. Democracies must uphold the values of liberty, respect for human rights, and regular, legal elections of all eligible voters.
To learn more about democratic click the link below:
brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ4
In which of the following situations would ONLY state law apply? a. A state constitution was recently amended to allow the segregation of its public schools. b. A group of protestors gather peacefully on state capitol grounds to protest abortion, c. Jim and John Brown want to form the Two Brothers Cleaning and Janitorial Company, Inc. and do business in Maryland d. Sam and Samantha need to file bankruptcy to get their Colorado medical debts
The appropriate answer is C. Jim and John Brown want to form the Two Brothers Cleaning and Janitorial Company, Inc. and do business in Maryland.
Before the Supreme Court's decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, it was disputed whether state laws may conflict with those of the federal government.
Separating Mexican American students from other students in schools would be against federal and Californian law. Eight years before Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court determined in Mendez v. Westminster that segregated schools were unfair. The evidence that Mexican American youngsters were struggling to acquire English due to lack of exposure was largely relied upon by the court. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court of the United States finally outlawed segregated schools nationwide because it believed that such schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment because they were inherently unequal, even if they had comparable facilities, teachers, and resources. In every state, segregated schools are against the law.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education here:
https://brainly.com/question/14010839
#SPJ4
Question 7566
The defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs for his alleged involvement in a major drug trafficking ring. The evidence tying the defendant to the drug trafficking ring was obtained from a warrantless search of the home of a business partner. The defendant had been living with his business partner, but recently moved out, leaving a bag filled with cocaine and his identification in the business partner's home. The bag was discovered by police during a search of the home with the business partner's consent. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to suppress the cocaine. How should the court rule on the defendant's motion to suppress?
Answers:
Deny the motion, because the business partner consented to the search of the home.
Deny the motion, because the defendant does not have a privacy interest in the home.
Grant the motion, because the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the home.
Grant the motion, because the evidence was discovered as a result of a warrantless search.
The correct answer is statement B "Deny the motion, because the defendant does not have a privacy interest in the home" because person has the right to be shielded against arbitrary searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment.
Fourth Amendment rights are individual and cannot be used in a representative capacity. Unless the defendant has been physically taken into custody or he has a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to the location being searched or the object being taken, he cannot successfully challenge government actions as being in violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. It is not sufficient to introduce an object that may incriminate the defendant as evidence.
Because the business partner had just left the house, the defendant in this case did not have a legitimate expectation of privacy there. Therefore, the defendant's request to have the cocaine suppressed should be rejected. A is the incorrect response option. Whether the cocaine should be admitted into evidence against the defendant does not depend on whether the business partner agreed to the search of the residence. Even if the search had been unlawful, the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the residence and cannot thus suppress any evidence discovered there.
To know more about government, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
carl is a 45-year old divorced father of two minor children. he owns a house that he shares with his common-law spouse. if carl dies intestate, what statement is true?
Carl's common-law partner would not be qualified to receive any of his estate unless they are specifically included in a will or other legal document.
Most likely, his two young children would inherit the most of his estate. A person with the legal right to receive an inheritance from ancestors who passed away without leaving a will is known as an heir (known as intestate). When such a property owner passes away, their legal successors will need to handle matters including property inheritance and other claims. In the event of a divorce, the wife will no longer have any claim to the property and will become the sole owner of all of its contents.
To know more about legal document refer to the link below :
brainly.com/question/29368022
#SPJ4
christopher columbus felt that the inhabitants of the territory where he landed would be easy to conquer.T/F
The given statement "Christopher Columbus felt that the inhabitants of the territory where he landed would be easy to conquer" is true.
When Italian adventurer Christopher Columbus arrives in the Bahamas after crossing the Atlantic, he believes he had reached East Asia.
In the 15th and 16th centuries, Europeans searched for maritime routes to the Far East.
To reach China, Japan, the Spice Islands, and India, Columbus looked for a new route. If he could only reach these nations, he could bring back lucrative shipments of spices and silks.
The Indians believed it would be easy to subdue them when Christopher Columbus first arrived in the area.
Before reaching Spain, Columbus' soldiers were prohibited from turning around and returning home because to their fear of being tried in a court martial for disobedience.
To know more about Christopher Columbus, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30358842?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
You find an article that is appropriate for your topic in a journal produced byundergraduate students. What could be a problem with this source?Select one: A. Relevance to your topic B. Accuracy of information C. Quality of author and publication D. Up-to-date information
B. Accuracy of information. The information contained in the article may not have been thoroughly fact-checked
A problem with the source could be the accuracy of information as journal articles produced by undergraduate students may not undergo the same level of peer-review and editorial oversight as articles published in professional or academic journals. The information contained in the article may not have been thoroughly fact-checked or reviewed by experts in the field, which could lead to inaccuracies or misunderstandings. While such articles can still provide useful information, it is important to critically evaluate their sources and be cautious when using them to make decisions or support arguments. It is also recommended to consult multiple sources and cross-reference information to verify its accuracy
Learn more about Accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/28482209
#SPJ4
case file documents for Case v. Spend Less Foods Matter. The case file documents are located in Appendix A. After reviewing the case file documents, what terms would you search to find law on this case? How would you phrase the legal issue for this matter?
Answer:
To find law on this case, I would search for terms related to the specific legal issues present in the case file documents. These terms might include keywords such as "breach of contract," "unfair business practices," or "consumer protection." I would also search for case law or statutes related to the specific state or jurisdiction in which the case is taking place.
The legal issue in this case, as it appears from the case file documents, seems to be a dispute between the plaintiff, Case, and the defendant, Spend Less Foods, over a breach of contract and/or unfair business practices. Specifically, it appears that Case is alleging that Spend Less Foods did not fulfill their end of a contract or engaged in business practices that are unjust or oppressive to consumers. The exact phrasing of the legal issue would depend on the specific facts and arguments presented in the case file documents.
At the Philadelphia Convention, the proposed plan to create a Congress where representation was distributed according to population was called the ________ Plan.
At the Philadelphia Convention, the proposed plan to create a Congress where representation was distributed according to population was called the Virrginia Plan.
The convention held at Philadelphia is considered as a significant event in the American political history. It was undertaken in the year 1787, which was a decade after the American independence. During this convention, James Madison had made a proposition to form a strong federal government in the United States. This government consisted of three different branches, as proposed under the Virrginia Plan.
Learn more about the Philadelphia Convention here:
https://brainly.com/question/11862692
#SPJ4
A defendant on trial for burglary planned to raise in his defense that his arrest was a result of racial profiling. During voir dire, the prosecutor exercised his peremptory challenges to exclude all nonwhite jurors, not just those of the defendant's race, from the jury panel. When the defendant objected to these challenges as racially discriminating, the prosecutor responded that he was concerned that nonwhite jurors would unfairly side with the defense's argument that the police unjustly profiled the defendant. Should the court sustain the defendant's objection?
No, the judge should not sustain the defendant's objection because the defendant did not specifically invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel.
The judge should not sustain the defendant's objection in this instance, as the defendant did not specifically invoke his Fifth Amendment right to counsel. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that an individual cannot be compelled to provide testimony that could be used to incriminate them.
If a defendant invokes their Fifth Amendment right to counsel, the court must ensure that the individual is afforded proper legal counsel. In this case, however, the defendant has not invoked their right to counsel and the judge should not sustain the objection.
To know more about defendant, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ4
why was The Federal Drug Administration was created
Explanation:
Because they prohibited the sale of misbranded or adulterated food and drugs in interstate commerce and laid a foundation for the nation's first consumer protection agency, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Toenforce the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906
FDA is supposed to make sure food & medicine aren't misbranded or adulterated
library.weill.cornell.edu
visitthecapitolgov
the american counseling association uses the term ""nonprofessional relationships"" when referring to dual or multiple relationships.
The given statement "The American counseling association uses the term "nonprofessional relationships" when referring to dual or multiple relationships" is true.
Dual partnerships describe a scenario in which a therapist and a client play several roles. A dual relationship is one in which a client is also a friend or family member, for instance.
Ethics rules alone can fix many relationship problems. You will have a solid basis for establishing healthy boundaries with clients if you are effective at setting limits in numerous areas of your personal life. A client might gain from a boundary crossing.
The complete question is-
The American counseling association uses the term "nonprofessional relationships" when referring to dual or multiple relationships.
True/False.
To know more about American, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2600449
#SPJ4
what is the quality policy of the university of rizal system and explain.
The quality policy of the university of rizal system is to continuously improve its quality management system processes to satisfy all applicable requirements commits to deliver excellent products- services.
In the small city of Tanay Calabarzon, An University of Rizal System is a non-profit public higher-education institution founded in 2001. The core values of Rizal system are courteous, considerate, integerate and responsibility.
Mission and vision of rizal secret mission was to observe the culture, laws, governments and lives of the countries in Europe.The message of Rizal is primarily to tell the importance of their capability to shape the future of our Motherland.
Learn more about Rizal System click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/16989421
#SPJ4
common self regulation practice when driving
Typical self-regulation driving techniques include- minimizing nighttime driving driving less when it's terrible outside. selecting routes to avoid traffic jams, roadwork, and challenging traffic conditions.
Self-regulation, or altering driving behaviour by avoiding risky circumstances or driving less as a result of deteriorating abilities, is being researched more and more as a strategy to support older drivers in maintaining their independence and extending the amount of time they can safely drive.
Cell phone use and distracted driving are two of the main and most frequent causes of traffic accidents. Driving while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol (ie: alcohol, prescription drugs, cannabis etc.)
To know more about Driving, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25351775
#SPJ4
identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of american democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government.
Individual liberties include freedom of expression, assembly, religion, and the right to a fair trial. Voter enfranchisement and political participation are two key democratic ideals that ensure citizens' political participation.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land, establishing the federal government, defining its powers and structures, and protecting all Americans' fundamental rights.The Constitution establishes the United States' form of government, which is a constitutional and federal republic.
A constitutional republic is one in which, rather than directly governing, the people choose some of their members to temporarily serve in political office; the constitutional part means that both citizens and governing officials are bound by the rules established in the Constitution. A federal republic is one in which the federal government has only limited powers for limited purposes, while state governments retain the majority of government powers.
Learn more about american democracy
https://brainly.com/question/17271015
#SPJ4
what is the responsibility of real estate personnel to access, read, interpret and apply legislation to their real estate activity?
Determine your personal responsibility for gaining access to, reading, understanding, and applying the law to real estate activities. Recognize and use methods for obtaining current and historical legislation.
What is real estate?Real estate is any immovable property of this kind that has a stake in a piece of land, a building, or housing in general. It also includes the natural resources on the land, such as water, crops, minerals, and minerals.
In legal terminology, real refers to real property, which is distinct from personal property, and estate refers to a person's "interest" in that real property.
Real estate is distinct from personal property, which includes things like cars, yachts, jewels, furniture, equipment, and a farm's rolling stock but is not affixed to the land permanently.
Single-family homes or multifamily buildings on residential real estate may be occupied or used for non-commercial purposes.
Learn more about real estate, here
https://brainly.com/question/17150470
#SPJ1
when using stare decisis, judges in future cases are most likely to follow the _____ in prior cases
When using stare decisis, judges in future cases are most likely to follow the precedent in prior cases.
In the legal system, a precedent is a court's ruling or decision. It is used as an illustration or analogy to support a judgement on a related case or legal issue.
In the early history of equity the court technically had freedom from precedent. Today, however, common law and equity, as found in the English and American legal systems, rely heavily on the body of established precedents.
The stare decisis principle came into use at the close of the 19th century.
A case cannot serve as precedent if the circumstances or issues in the case are different from those in the precedent case.
Because of this, a previous ruling only applies to issues that the court specifically took into account while making its decision.
To know more about precedent, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2033336
#SPJ4
in trey's december 31 year-end balance sheet, what amount should be reported as total current assets?
The information regarding Trey's December 31 year-end balance sheet. The amount reported as total current assets would depend on the specific assets and their values that Trey had on that date.
Estimated tax payments of $300,000 were charged to prepaid taxes in 2001. Income tax expense has not yet been recorded. Trey's tax rate is 30%, so there were no differences between his financial statement and his income tax income.
Included in A/R is a $500k debt owed by a customer. This customer's special terms require payment in equal semiannual installments of $125,000 on April 1 and October 1.
What amount should be reported as total current assets on Trey's balance sheet as of December 31, 20X1
The correct answer is 1,950K.
To learn more about Trey's December 31 balance sheet here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765781
#SPJ4
which best characterizes the political system in china?
China has one party System. The Chinese Communist Party is the sole source of political authority in the People's Republic of China, which is governed by the autocratic Government of the People's Republic of China (CCP). The correct option is A.
It is an authoritarian system in China. The CCP controls all religious activities, there are no duly elected national leaders, political opposition is repressed, dissent is not allowed, and civil rights are restricted. China has a one-party authoritarian political system, which governs elections.
Since the implementation of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, China has had what economists refer to as a socialist market economy—one in which market capitalism and private ownership coexist alongside a significant state-owned businesses sector.
The complete Question is-
Which best characterizes the political system in china?
A) China has one - party system
B) China has Multi- Party System
C) Elections are not conducted in China
D) None of the above.
To know more about China , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9695945
#SPJ4
procedural rule here, or is the court making a statement about the substantive law?
Court is making a state-ment about the substantive law. Substantive laws are the stat-utory laws pass-ed by the legislature. Where-as, procedural laws com-prise the rules and pro-cesses which any court follows for hear-ing and deter-mining the cases.
Substantive law is a statutory law that de-als with the legal relationship bet-ween people or the peo-ple and the state. Procedural law con-sists of the set of rules that govern the proceed-ings of the court in criminal law-suits as well as civil and adminis-trative proceed-ings.
Substantive law is an indepen-dent set of laws that de-cide the fate of a case. Procedural laws on the ot-her hand, have no independ-ent existence.
To know more about substantive law click below:
brainly.com/question/4233831
#SPJ4
Explain the concept of collective efficacy. What impact does it have on crime in a neighborhood?
Answer:
Collective efficacy refers to a community's shared belief in its ability to take action and produce desired outcomes. It is a measure of social cohesion and mutual trust within a community, and is often used to assess the effectiveness of community-level interventions to reduce crime and improve safety.
Collective efficacy has been shown to have a strong impact on crime in a neighborhood. Research has found that neighborhoods with high levels of collective efficacy tend to have lower crime rates, and that collective efficacy is a stronger predictor of crime than other social and economic factors. This is because communities with high levels of collective efficacy are better able to mobilize resources and take action to address crime and disorder, and are less likely to tolerate criminal behavior.
Additionally, neighborhoods with high collective efficacy tend to have more active and effective community organizations and higher levels of social capital, which can also contribute to reducing crime. Studies have also found that collective efficacy is positively associated with civic engagement, collective action and social control, which are key factors in preventing crime.
Overall, collective efficacy is an important concept in understanding crime in a neighborhood, as it highlights the importance of social cohesion and trust in addressing crime and promoting safety.
a federal statute provides that the cities in which certain specified airports are located may regulate the rates and services of all limousines that serve those airports, without regard to the origin or destination of the passengers who use the limousines. true or false
A federal statute provides that the cities in which certain specified airports are located may regulate the rates and services of all limousines that serve those airports. The given statement is true.
Redville and Greenville are cities in different states that are close to each other. The airport that serves both of them is located in Redville and is one of those designated by federal law.
The Redville City Council has enacted a law requiring any limousine serving the airport to charge only the Redville City Council-approved prices.
Airline Limousine Service does a profitable business transporting passengers between Greenville and the Redville airport at significantly lower prices than those mandated by the Redville City Council.
It solely carries passengers interstate; it does not provide local service within Redville. The Redville City Council's new ordinance would require Airline Limousine Service to charge the same prices as taxis.
To know more about federal statute:
https://brainly.com/question/30356979
#SPJ4
which type of institution operates through laws and regulations to influence behavior?
Formal Institutions operates through laws and regulations to influence behavior.
Written rules and regulations that are to be put into effect in order to legally create a nation and stabilise the economy have been publicly adopted by formal institutions, defining the regulator pillar that is intended to regulate both corporate and individual behaviour.
The costs of conducting business are decreased by institutions that support economic growth. The expenses cover transaction fees including those for searching for and gathering information, haggling and making decisions, and maintaining law and order.
To know more about Institutions, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13333686
#SPJ4
identify the true statements about the sale of patent medicines in the united states during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Out of the given statements, the statement, ''psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources,'' is true about the sale of patent medicine in the United States of America in the years during the late nineteenth and early 20th centuries. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The psychoactive substances had an abundance of availability during the 19th and 20th centuries. This situation came to the rise, as the demand for patent medicines grew rapidly during this period. Moreover, the supply and production capacities were also sufficient to fulfill the market demand in the United States of America.
Learn more about patent medicine here:
https://brainly.com/question/25749134
#SPJ4
Complete question
Identify the true statements about the sale of patent medicines in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
A. Psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources.
B. Psychoactive substances had a lot of shortage during the 19th and 20th centuries
C. Both A and B
D. None of the above
the stages through which a lawsuit passes is called the __ process. a case
The stages through which a lawsuit passes is commonly referred to as the "litigation process." It typically consists of the following steps:Filing a Complaint.
Service of Process: This step involves serving the defendant with a copy of the complaint and a summons, which notifies them of the lawsuit and the requirement to respond.Answer to Complaint: After being served, the defendant has a specified period of time to respond to the complaint, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss.Discovery: This stage involves the exchange of information and evidence between the parties to build their cases. This can include document requests, depositions, and interrogatoriesPretrial Motions: Both parties may file motions to resolve specific legal issues before trial, such as a motion for summary judgment or a motion to exclude evidence.Trial: If the case has not been resolved through a settlement or motion, it will proceed to trial, where both sides will present their evidence and arguments to a judge or jury.Appeal: If either party is unhappy with the outcome of the trial, they may file an appeal to a higher court.The length of the litigation process can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the case, the jurisdiction in which it is filed, and the availability of the court.
To learn more about lawsuit click the link below:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
which of the underlying theories, if any, requires proof of a recklessly made promise that causes reliance and produces hardship when broken?
Among the given theories, "Promissory estoppel underlying theories", if requires proof of a recklessly made promise that causes reliance and produces hardship when broken.
Hence, option (d) is the correct choice.
The theory forbids the promisor or company from breaking their word or breaking their promise. For example, a vendor may make an oral guarantee to a client to replace items if they do not meet the buyer's size specifications. The consumer buys the clothing and brings them home.
The equitable notion of promissory estoppel was developed by equity to prevent injustice. The doctrine allows the promisor to withdraw from his commitment if the promisee changes his or her stance while acting on the promisor's promise.
A commitment not to do something you are legally permitted to do is only good contract consideration if the contract concerns products rather than services.
For more questions on Promissory estoppel underlying theories
https://brainly.com/question/2575658
#SPJ4
The missing option may be:
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory
McClelland's Three Needs Theory
Promissory estoppel underlying theories
Duff reported that the due process model does not agree with the majority of cases in which criminal are sanctioned for their crimes
The due process model is a form of model in the criminal justice system while deciding the guilt of the accused in the entire process.
The formal framework is the cornerstone of the due process model. The due process model safeguards the rights of defendants accused of various offences when applied properly.
the effect of many mistakes that happen throughout the investigation, arrest, gathering of evidence, and trial are mitigated by the due process paradigm.
However, Duff believes that this model is not sufficient for the best interests of the accused. There are numerous elements and reasons why most of the evidence presented in criminal cases is not supported by due process.
The due process paradigm essentially condemns all types of evidence with the exception of undeniable physical evidence that cannot be refuted.
In the due process concept, examining the evidence is intended to determine what information may be false, inaccurate, or obtained under duress from a person.
To know more about due process model click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Duff reported that the due process model does not agree with the majority of cases in which criminal are sanctioned for their crimes. What is meant by the due process model?
Defendant is on trial for armed bank robbery. He wishes to testify about his alibi, but he has two prior criminal convictions: (1) a misdemeanor conviction for filing a false police report 15 years ago; and (2) a felony robbery conviction from 11 years ago. Defendant spent three years in prison for the robbery.
Which, if either, of these convictions is admissible against him?
A. Both are admissible only if the court finds that their probative value substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect.
B. Both crimes are admissible if their probative value outweighs their prejudicial effect.
C. The false police report is automatically admissible; the robbery is admissible only if its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.
D. The false police report is admissible only if its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect; the robbery is admissible if its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect.
In the given situation, it may be stated that the false report made by the defendant is admissible only when the probative value substantially outweighs the prejudicial effect; the robbery is admissible if its probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect. Therefore, the option D holds true.
A defendant may be referred to or considered as a person who is held against a charge in the court of law. He or she has to defend the charges made against him or her by the plaintiff. A plaintiff, on the other hand, is the one makes the charges against the defendant.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ4
