1. The weight of turkeys is normally distributed with a mean of 22 pounds and a standard deviation of 5 pounds.
a. Find the probability that a randomly selected turkey weighs between 20 and 26 pounds. Round to 3 decimals and keep '0' before the decimal point.
b. Find the probability that a randomly selected turkey weighs below 12 pounds. Round to 3 decimals and keep '0' before the decimal point.
2.Scores on a marketing exam are known to be normally distribute with mean and standard deviation of 60 and 20, respectively. The syllabus suggests that the top 15% of the students will get an A in the course. What is the minimum score required to get an A? Please round to an integer number.

The resultant vector M+N with M = 4.00 m points eastward and vector N = 3.00 m points southward is 5.00 m at an angle 36.9 degree south of east.

To find the resultant vector M + N, where vector M = 4.00 m points eastward and vector N = 3.00 m points southward, we can use the Pythagorean theorem and trigonometry to calculate the magnitude and direction of the resultant vector.

Step 1: Calculate the magnitude of the resultant vector.
Magnitude = √(M² + N²) = √(4.00² + 3.00²) = √(16 + 9) = √25 = 5.00 m

Step 2: Calculate the angle of the resultant vector using the arctangent function.
Angle = arctan(opposite/adjacent) = arctan(N/M) = arctan(3.00/4.00) = arctan(0.75) ≈ 36.9 degrees

So, the resultant vector M + N is 5.00 m at an angle of 36.9 degrees south of east. The correct answer is B) 5.00 m at an angle 36.9 degrees south of east.

Learn more about using trigonometry to resolve vectors : https://brainly.com/question/17264346

#SPJ11

Answer:

In the explanation part.

Step-by-step explanation:

You use the equation = d x 3.14

Answer: you multiply the diameter times PI

Step-by-step explanation:

there is probably a Therom out there for why this formula works. But I don’t know if

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angles are complementary if their sum is equal to 90 degrees. So, we can write an equation:

4x + 14 + 3x - 15 = 90

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

7x - 1 = 90

7x = 91

x = 13

Now, we can use x to find the measures of the two angles:

The first angle is 4x + 14 = 4(13) + 14 = 66 degrees.

The second angle is 3x - 15 = 3(13) - 15 = 24 degrees.

Therefore, the measures of the two angles are 66 degrees and 24 degrees.

The correct answer is option A. The assumption that is made so that the pooled variance estimate can be substituted for the population variances within the standard error of the differences formula is that the population variances are homogeneous.

This implies that the variances of the two populations under comparison should be comparable.

For many statistical tests, including the t-test and ANOVA, homogeneity of variance is a crucial presumption. The pooled variance estimate is not a reliable substitute for population variances if the variances of the two populations are not equal.

Consequently, in order to apply the pooled variance estimate in the standard error of the differences formula, the homogeneity of variance assumption is required.

Complete Question:

What  assumption is made so that the pooled variance estimate can be substituted for the population variances within the standard error of the differences formula?

A. The population variances are homogeneous

B. The population variances are heterogeneous

C. The sample sizes are equal

D. The sample sizes are large

To learn more about variances visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28426562

#SPJ4

The value of the coefficient C in the solution y = Ax² + Bx + C is 3.

To find C, we can substitute y = Ax² + Bx + C into the given equation y″ - y′ + y = x² + 3x + 5.

First, let's find y' and y″:

y' = d/dx(Ax² + Bx + C) = 2Ax + B
y″ = d²/dx²(Ax² + Bx + C) = 2A

Now, substitute y, y', and y″ into the equation:

2A - (2Ax + B) + (Ax²+ Bx + C) = x² + 3x + 5

Now, let's compare coefficients for each power of x:

x² coefficients:
A = 1 (since we have x² on both sides)

x coefficients:
-2A + B = 3 => -2(1) + B = 3 => B = 5

Constant term:
2A + C = 5 => 2(1) + C = 5 => C = 3

You can learn more about coefficients at: brainly.com/question/30066987

#SPJ11

To find the derivative of y=ln(x^2y^2) at (e^5-25,5), use the chain rule and product rule of differentiation. Rewrite the equation, find the partial derivatives dx/dt and dy/dt, and plug in the values to get the derivative of 0.

To find the derivative y′ of y=ln(x^2y^2) at the point (e^5-25,5), we need to use the chain rule and product rule of differentiation.
First, we can rewrite the equation y=ln(x^2y^2) as:
y=2ln|x|+2ln|y|
Then, taking the derivative of each term using the chain rule and product rule:
y' = 2(1/x)(dx/dt) + 2(1/y)(dy/dt)
where dx/dt and dy/dt are the partial derivatives of x and y with respect to some parameter t (which is not given in the question, but we can assume it is time t).
At the point (e^5-25,5), we can plug in the values for x and y:
x = e^(5-25) = e^(-20)
y = 5
Now, we need to find the partial derivatives dx/dt and dy/dt. From the equation x^2y^2 = e^(10), we can take the logarithm of both sides:
ln(x^2y^2) = 10
Using implicit differentiation, we get:
(2x*dx/dt + 2y*dy/dt)/(x^2y^2) = 0
Rearranging and substituting the values for x and y, we get:
dx/dt = -y/x * dy/dt = -5/e^20 * dy/dt
Next, we can find dy/dt by differentiating the equation y = 5 with respect to t:
dy/dt = 0
Finally, we can plug in these values into the derivative formula to get:
y' = 2(1/x)(dx/dt) + 2(1/y)(dy/dt)
  = 2(1/e^-20)(-5/e^20*0) + 2(1/5)(0)
  = 0
Therefore, the derivative y′ of y = ln(x^2y^2) at the point (e^5-25,5) is 0.

Read more about derivative: https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

The reaction velocities at the given substrate concentrations are 50% and 66.67% of [tex]V_{max}[/tex], respectively.

We'll discuss the reaction velocity (V) in terms of [tex]V_{max}[/tex] at different substrate concentrations ([S]) for an enzyme that obeys Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

(a) If [S] = [tex]K_{m}[/tex], then V = [tex]V_{max}[/tex]  [S]/([S] + [tex]K_{m}[/tex])

Since [S] = [tex]K_{m}[/tex], the equation becomes:
V = [tex]V_{max}[/tex]  [tex]K_{m}[/tex]/([tex]K_{m}[/tex] + [tex]K_{m}[/tex])

= [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * [tex]K_{m}[/tex]/(2[tex]K_{m}[/tex])

The [tex]K_{m}[/tex] terms cancel out, leaving:
V =[tex]V_{max}[/tex]/2

To express this as a percentage of [tex]V_{max}[/tex], we have:
V = ([tex]V_{max}[/tex]/2) / [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * 100 = 50%

(b) If [S] = 2.00[tex]K_{m}[/tex], then V = [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * [S]/([S] + [tex]K_{m}[/tex])

Since [S] = 2.00[tex]K_{m}[/tex], the equation becomes:
V = [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * 2[tex]K_{m}[/tex]/(2[tex]K_{m}[/tex] + [tex]K_{m}[/tex])

= [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * 2[tex]K_{m}[/tex]/(3[tex]K_{m}[/tex])

The [tex]K_{m}[/tex] terms cancel out, leaving:
V = (2/3)[tex]V_{max}[/tex]

To express this as a percentage of [tex]V_{max}[/tex], we have:
V = (2/3)[tex]V_{max}[/tex] / [tex]V_{max}[/tex] * 100 ≈ 66.67%

So, the reaction velocities at the given substrate concentrations are 50% and 66.67% of [tex]V_{max}[/tex], respectively.

Learn more about concentration:

https://brainly.com/question/28564792

#SPJ11

The given function is not a valid cdf because it does not satisfy the property that 0 ≤ Fx,y(x,y) ≤ 1 for all x and y. Specifically, when x=1 and y=1, Fx,y(x,y) = -1, which is outside the range of possible cdf values.

(a) To sketch the joint cdf, we can plot the function Fx,y(x,y) for x>1 and y>1 on a 3D coordinate system. The surface will be a decreasing function that approaches 0 as x and y approach infinity.

(b) To find the marginal cdf of X, we integrate Fx,y(x,y) with respect to y over the entire range of y:

Fx(x) = integral from 1 to infinity of (1 - 1/x^2)(1 - 1/y^2) dy

Simplifying the integral:

Fx(x) = (1 - 1/x^2) [y - (1/y)] from 1 to infinity

Since the second term approaches 0 as y approaches infinity, we can ignore it:

Fx(x) = 1 - 1/x^2

Similarly, to find the marginal cdf of Y, we integrate Fx,y(x,y) with respect to x over the entire range of x:

Fy(y) = integral from 1 to infinity of (1 - 1/x^2)(1 - 1/y^2) dx

Simplifying the integral:

Fy(y) = (1 - 1/y^2) [x - (1/x)] from 1 to infinity

Again, the second term approaches 0 as x approaches infinity, so we can ignore it:

Fy(y) = 1 - 1/y^2

(c) To find the probability of the event {X < 3, Y ≤ 5}, we integrate Fx,y(x,y) over the region where X < 3 and Y ≤ 5:

P(X < 3, Y ≤ 5) = integral from 1 to 3 of integral from 1 to 5 of (1 - 1/x^2)(1 - 1/y^2) dy dx

Simplifying the integral:

P(X < 3, Y ≤ 5) = (3/2 - 2/3 - ln(5/3))/4

To find the probability of the event {X > 4, Y > 3}, we can use the complement rule:

P(X > 4, Y > 3) = 1 - P(X ≤ 4, Y > 3) - P(X > 4, Y ≤ 3) + P(X ≤ 4, Y ≤ 3)

Using the marginal cdfs we found earlier, we can simplify this expression:

P(X > 4, Y > 3) = 1 - Fx(4) + Fy(3) - Fx,y(4,3)

Substituting the given joint cdf:

P(X > 4, Y > 3) = 1 - (1 - 1/4^2) + (1 - 1/3^2) - (1 - 1/4^2*3^2)

Simplifying the expression:

P(X > 4, Y > 3) = 43/144

5.21. The given function is not a valid cdf because it does not satisfy the property that 0 ≤ Fx,y(x,y) ≤ 1 for all x and y. Specifically, when x=1 and y=1, Fx,y(x,y) = -1, which is outside the range of possible cdf values.

Learn more about values here:

brainly.com/question/11882293

#SPJ11

The DPMO for the first characteristic is 222, the DPMO for the other eight characteristics is 111, and the overall DPMO for the boards is 1,111.

To calculate the DPMO (Defects Per Million Opportunities) for each characteristic, we first need to find the number of opportunities for defects for each characteristic. Since we inspected 3,000 boards and there are 9 characteristics, the total number of opportunities is 27,000 (3,000 × 9).

For the first characteristic, we found 6 defects, so the DPMO is:

DPMO = (6 / 27,000) × 1,000,000 = 222

For the other eight characteristics, we found 3 defects each, so the DPMO for each is:

DPMO = (3 / 27,000) × 1,000,000 = 111

To find the overall DPMO for the boards, we need to add up all the defects and divide by the total number of opportunities:

Total defects = 6 + (8 × 3) = 30

Total opportunities = 27,000

Overall DPMO = (30 / 27,000) × 1,000,000 = 1,111

Therefore, the DPMO for the first characteristic is 222, the DPMO for the other eight characteristics is 111, and the overall DPMO for the boards is 1,111.

Learn more about DPMO ,

https://brainly.com/question/14337840

#SPJ4

The Taylor polynomial T3(x) of degree 3 for the function f(x) near x = 0 is given as: T3(x) = 4 - 3x + x^2 + 4x^3

A Taylor series is a series expansion of a function about a point. A one-dimensional Taylor series is an expansion of a real function f(x) about a point x=a is given by f(x)=f(a)+f^'(a)(x-a)+(f^('')(a))/(2!)(x-a)^2+(f^((3))(a))/(3!)(x-a)^3+...+(f^((n))(a))/(n!)(x-a)^n+.... .

If a=0, the expansion is known as a Maclaurin series.

Taylor's theorem (actually discovered first by Gregory) states that any function satisfying certain conditions can be expressed as a Taylor series.

The Taylor (or more general) series of a function f(x) about a point a up to order n may be found using Series[f,  {x, a, n}]. The nth term of a Taylor series of a function f can be computed in the Wolfram Language using SeriesCoefficient[f,  {x, a, n}] and is given by the inverse Z-transform  To find the values of f(0), f'(0), f''(0), and f'''(0), we need to differentiate T3(x) up to the third order and then evaluate the derivatives at x = 0.
So, let's start by finding the first derivative of T3(x):
T3'(x) = -3 + 2x + 12x^2
Now, we can evaluate T3(x), T3'(x), and T3''(x) at x = 0:
f(0) = T3(0) = 4 - 0 + 0 + 0 = 4
f'(0) = T3'(0) = -3 + 0 + 0 = -3
To find the second derivative, we differentiate T3'(x):
T3''(x) = 2 + 24x
Then, we evaluate T3''(x) at x = 0:
f''(0) = T3''(0) = 2 + 0 = 2
Finally, to find the third derivative, we differentiate T3''(x):
T3'''(x) = 24
And evaluate T3'''(x) at x = 0:
f'''(0) = T3'''(0) = 24
Therefore, the values of f(0), f'(0), f''(0), and f'''(0) for the function f(x) approximated near x = 0 by the 3rd degree Taylor polynomial T3(x) = 4 - 3x + x^2 + 4x^3 are:
f(0) = 4
f'(0) = -3
f''(0) = 2
f'''(0) = 24

Learn More About Taylor Series: https://brainly.com/question/28168045

#SPJ11

The coordinates of point D are approximately:  D ≈ (x/2, √(3)x/2)

Trigonometry is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of relationships between the sides and angles of triangles. It is used to calculate the lengths of sides and measures of angles in triangles, as well as in other geometric shapes and in physics and engineering applications. Trigonometry is based on the relationships between the ratios of the sides of a right triangle (a triangle with one angle measuring 90 degrees). The three primary trigonometric ratios are sine, cosine, and tangent, and they are commonly abbreviated as sin, cos, and tan, respectively. Trigonometry also includes the study of inverse trigonometric functions, which are used to find angles given the ratio of sides.

Let's assume that point A is located at the origin (0,0) and point B is located on the positive x-axis at (x,0). Then, we can use trigonometry to find the coordinates of point D.

First, we know that angle ABD is 2π/3 radians, and we can find the length of segment AB using the x-coordinate of point B:

AB = x

Next, we can use the law of cosines to find the length of segment BD:

[tex]BD^2 = AB^2 + AD^2[/tex] - 2(AB)(AD)cos(2π/3)

Simplifying this equation using the fact that cos(2π/3) = -1/2, we get:

[tex]BD^2 = x^2 + AD^2 + xAD[/tex]

We also know that angle ADB is π/3 radians, so we can use trigonometry to find AD:

tan(π/3) = AD/BD

Simplifying this equation using the fact that tan(π/3) = sqrt(3), we get:

AD = √(3)BD

Substituting this expression into the equation for BD², we get:

[tex]BD^2 = x^2 + 3xBD^2[/tex]

Solving for BD, we get:

BD = x/√(4)

BD = x/2

Substituting this expression into the equation for AD, we get:

AD = √(3)xBD = √(3)x/2

Therefore, the coordinates of point D are approximately:

D ≈ (x/2, √(3)x/2)

Note that these are just approximate coordinates, and the actual coordinates of point D may be slightly different depending on the specific values of x and the location of point B.

Learn more about cosine here

https://brainly.com/question/29114352

#SPJ1

Answer: the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

The largest value is α(T), and the value for the subtrees rooted at the grandchildren of the root is α0(T).

To determine α0(T) in terms of n and α(T) for a tree T with n vertices, follow these steps:

1. Understand the terms:
  - T is a tree with n vertices.
  - α(T) is the maximum size of an independent set in T.
  - α0(T) is the maximum size of an independent set in T that includes the root.

2. Observe that a tree has no cycles.

3. For the maximum independent set that includes the root, α0(T), exclude all children of the root since they are directly connected to the root. Then, find the maximum independent set for each subtree rooted at the grandchildren of the root.

4. For the maximum independent set that does not include the root, α(T), find the maximum independent set for each subtree rooted at the children of the root.

5. Compare the values obtained in steps 3 and 4, and the largest value is α(T). The value obtained in step 3 is α0(T).

You can learn more about vertices at: brainly.com/question/30116773

#SPJ11

Non-sampling error are Mistake made while copying down the responses, The person distributing the medicine subconsciously made a face when handing out the placebo pill, The way questions were worded influenced the responses and Some people refused to answer certain questions, and these people are likely to have different opinions from those who did answer those questions. So, the options are A, C, D and F. Sampling error are A specific group was accidentally excluded from the sample and The proportion in the sample is not equal to the proportion in the population. So, the options are B and E.

In survey research, errors can arise due to sampling or non-sampling factors. Sampling errors occur due to the random variation in the selection of the sample and can be quantified using statistical methods.

On the other hand, non-sampling errors occur due to various factors such as data collection, processing, and analysis, which are not related to the sampling method. The errors mentioned in the question are classified as sampling or non-sampling errors based on their origin.

The distinction is important because sampling errors can be reduced by increasing the sample size or using appropriate sampling techniques, whereas non-sampling errors can be reduced by improving the data collection process or using appropriate data cleaning and analysis techniques.

So, the answers for non-sampling errors are A, C, D and F and the answers for sampling errors are B and E.

To know more about non-sampling and sampling errors:

https://brainly.com/question/28970095

#SPJ4

The radical expression 5√(12 * 50) when simplified is 50√6

Given that

5√(12 * 50)

First, we can simplify the expression inside the square root:

12 and 50 have a common factor of 2:

12 * 50 = 2 * 6 * 5 * 5 * 2 * 5 = 2^2 * 5^2 * 6

So, 5√(12 * 50) becomes:

5√(12 * 50) = 5√(2^2 * 5^2 * 6)

5√(12 * 50) = 5 * 2 * 5 * √6

5√(12 * 50) = 50√6

Therefore, 5√(12 * 50) simplifies to 50√6.

Read more about expression at

https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

Answer: 77.33

Step-by-step explanation:

232 divided by 3 = 77.33

Answer:10

Step-by-step explanation:

beausepppppp

The side length of the smaller cube inscribed within the sphere is approximately 0.7071.

To find the side length of the smaller cube inscribed within the sphere, which is inscribed in a unit cube, we can follow these steps:
Determine the diameter of the inscribed sphere.
Since the sphere is inscribed in the unit cube, its diameter will be equal to the side length of the unit cube. Therefore, the diameter of the inscribed sphere is 1.
Calculate the radius of the inscribed sphere.
The radius of the sphere is half of its diameter, so the radius is 0.5.
Apply the Pythagorean theorem to the smaller cube.
We can imagine a right triangle formed by half the side length of the smaller cube (let's call this length 's') and the sphere's radius (0.5) as the two shorter sides, and the diagonal of the smaller cube as the hypotenuse.
By applying the Pythagorean theorem, we get:
(s/2)^2 + (s/2)^2 = (0.5)^2
Solve for the side length 's' of the smaller cube.
Expanding the equation, we get:
2 * (s^2 / 4) = 0.25
(s^2 / 2) = 0.25
s^2 = 0.5
s = sqrt(0.5)
Express the side length 's' of the smaller cube.
The side length of the smaller cube, 's', is equal to the square root of 0.5, which can also be written as sqrt(0.5) or approximately 0.7071.
So, the side length of the smaller cube inscribed within the sphere is approximately 0.7071.

for more questions on cube

https://brainly.com/question/10421656

#SPJ11

To approximate sin(153°) using a linear approximation of f(x) = sin(x) at x = 5π/6, follow these steps:

1. Convert 153° to radians: 153° * (π/180) ≈ 2.67035 radians

2. Find the value of sin(x) at x = 5π/6: sin(5π/6) = sin(150°) = 1/2

3. Calculate the derivative of sin(x): f'(x) = cos(x)

4. Find the value of f'(x) at x = 5π/6: cos(5π/6) = cos(150°) = -√3/2

5. Determine the difference between 5π/6 and 153° in radians: Δx = 2.67035 - 5π/6 ≈ 0.034907

6. Apply the linear approximation formula: f(x) ≈ f(a) + f'(a)(x - a), where a = 5π/6 and x = 153° in radians.

7. Plug in the values: sin(153°) ≈ 1/2 + (-√3/2)(0.034907)

8. Calculate the result: sin(153°) ≈ 0.50039

9. Round to four decimal places: sin(153°) ≈ 0.5004

So, sin(153°) is approximately 0.5004 using a linear approximation of f(x) = sin(x) at x = 5π/6.

Learn more about linear approximation: https://brainly.com/question/28325512

#SPJ11

Jimmy can use Hypothesis test for goodness of fit to test whether or not the shuffle feature is working correctly

Chi-Squared Test can also be used to compare the observed frequencies of each each music genre in the 100 songs that he listened to with the expected frequencies which will be based on how the music genres are distributed in his library

The Shuffle feature is working correctly and the frequencies which are observed  in 100 songs are not different from the frequencies which are to be expected that will be the null hypothesis for this test

The Shuffle feature is not working correctly and the frequencies which are observed in 100 songs are somewhat different from the expected frequencies

To learn more about null hypothesis:

https://brainly.com/question/25263462

#SPJ4

The buoyant forces acting on the two 5-cm-diameter spherical balls made of aluminum and iron submerged in water will be the same.

This is because the buoyant force depends on the volume of the displaced fluid, which is the same for both balls since they have the same diameter. The materials they are made of do not affect the buoyant force as long as their volumes are the same.
The buoyant forces acting on the two 5-cm-diameter spherical balls made of aluminum and iron submerged in water will be the same. This is because buoyant force depends on the volume of fluid displaced by the object, and since both balls have the same diameter and are spherical, they displace the same volume of water, leading to equal buoyant forces.

To learn more about diameter click here

brainly.com/question/5501950

#SPJ11

The value of p that satisfies the conditions of the problem is 50%. This means that the width was decreased by 50%, or  it was halved. We need to use the formula for the area of a rectangle.

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for the area of a rectangle, which is:
Area = Length x Width
Let's say that the original length of the rectangle was L, and the original width was W. After increasing the length by 20%, the new length becomes 1.2L. After decreasing the width by p percent, the new width becomes (1-p/100)W.
The new area of the rectangle can be calculated using the new length and width:
New Area = (1.2L) x (1-p/100)W
We are given that this new area is 40% less than the original area. So we can set up an equation:
New Area = 0.6 x Original Area
Substituting the expressions for new area and original area:
(1.2L) x (1-p/100)W = 0.6LW
Simplifying this equation by cancelling out the W terms:
1.2(1-p/100)L = 0.6L
Simplifying further by dividing both sides by 1.2L:
1-p/100 = 0.5
Subtracting 1 from both sides:
-p/100 = -0.5
Multiplying both sides by -100:
p = 50
Therefore, the value of p that satisfies the conditions of the problem is 50%. This means that the width was decreased by 50%, or in other words, it was halved.

for more questions on rectangle

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ11

1. Initialize the flow through each edge to be zero.
2. Construct the residual graph, which represents the capacity still available on each edge.
3. Find an augmenting path in the residual graph using any method such as Depth-First Search (DFS) or Breadth-First Search (BFS).
4. Update the flow along the augmenting path, increasing the flow through the forward edges and decreasing the flow through the reverse edges.
5. Repeat steps 2-4 until no augmenting paths can be found in the residual graph.
The sum of flows exiting the source node at the end of this process will be the maximum flow for the given flow network.

The maximum flow is the highest possible amount of flow that can be sent through the network without violating any capacity constraints. To find this maximum flow, we need to use algorithms such as the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm or the Edmonds-Karp algorithm. These algorithms iteratively find paths from the source to the sink that can increase the flow until no more paths can be found. The final flow value found by these algorithms is the maximum flow for the network.
To find the maximum flow of a flow network, you can use the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm. This algorithm iteratively augments the flow through network models by finding an augmenting path in the residual graph. The maximum flow is reached when no more augmenting paths can be found.

Learn more about Maximum:

brainly.com/question/17467131

#SPJ11

The function f(x) = x³ - 10x² + 31x - 30, satisfied all the three conditions of rolle's theorem on interval [2,5], that is verified it. The values of c in the interval are [tex]\frac{ 10 + \sqrt{7}}{3}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{ 10 + \sqrt{7}}{3}[/tex].

Rolle's theorem are important for the theorem to be true, three main conditions for it are following:

We have a function, f(x) = x³ - 10x² + 31x - 30 --(1) on interval [2,5]. We have to verify the rolle's theorem for f(x). First differentiating f(x) in equation (1),

f'(x) = 3x² - 20x + 31

Now, f'(x) is exist for every value of x in interval [2,5]. Hence, f(x) is differential function. As we know every differential function is continuous function. This implies f(x) is continuous function in

interval [2,5]. Now, value of function f(x) at x = 2 and 5

=> f( 2) = 2³ - 10×2² + 31×2 -30

= 8 - 40 + 62 - 30 = 0

f( 5) = 5³ - 10× 5² + 31× 5 - 30

= 125 - 250 + 155 - 30 = 0

So, f( 2) = f(5) = 0, thus, all three conditions of rolle's theorem are satisfied. So, rolle's theorem is verified for function f(x) = x³ - 10x² - 31x - 30. To determine the value of c , put f'(c) = 0

=> 3c² - 20c + 31 = 0, which is an quadratic equation. Solve it using quadratic formula, [tex]c = \frac{- (-20) ± \sqrt{20² - 4×3×31}}{2×3}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{ 20 ± \sqrt{28}}{6}[/tex]

= [tex] \frac{ 10 ± \sqrt{7}}{3}[/tex]. Hence, required values of c are [tex] \frac{ 10 ± \sqrt{7}}{3}[/tex].

For more information about Rolle's theorem, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29438393

#SPJ4

From law of cosine formula, the width of lake for which Julia wants to determine the distance at certain points across a lake is equals to the 4023.4 meters.

Law of cosine in triangle is used to determine the length of third side of triangle when two other sides and angle between them is known. Cosine formula is c² = a² + b² - 2ab cosC , where

Julia wants to determine the distance at certain points across a lake. See the above figure and reconigse the measurements. Here, the width of lake is represented by AB. There is formed a triangle ABC, with following details,

Length of side AC = 2.82 mi

Length of side BC = 3.86 mi

Measure of angle C = 40.3°

We have to determine value of AB. Using the law cosine formula, AB² = BC² + AC² - 2AC× BC cosC

=> AB² = 2.82² + 3.86² - 2×2.82×3.86 ×cos( 40.3°)

=> AB² = 7.9524 + 14.8696 - 21.7764 ×cos( 40.3°)

=> AB² = 22.852 - 16.603

=> AB ² = 6.2485

=> AB = 2.4996

Hence, required width is 2.5 miles. But we needs answer in meter then convert miles into meters, 1 mile = 1609.344 m

so, 2.5 miles = 2.5 × 1609.344 meters = 4023.36 m ~ 4023.4 meters.

For more information about law of cosine, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30249060

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The above figure complete the question.

julia needs to determine the distance at certain points across a lake. her crew and she are able to measure the distances shown on the diagram below. find how wide the lake is to the nearest tenth of a meter.

Answer: 30

Step-by-step explanation:

15 is a odd but not a counterexample

18 is a even and is not a counterexample

30 divided 5 = 6

35 is a odd but not a counterexample

Counterexample: if a number is divided by 5 then it is an even number.

Therefore, the solution for the variable a is a = 2b - x. The specific process we followed was to use basic algebraic operations, including the distributive property and isolating variables on one side of the equation, to solve for the given variable.

In mathematics, an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two expressions. Equations are formed using mathematical symbols and operations, such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponents, and roots. An equation typically consists of two sides, with an equal sign in between. The expression on the left-hand side is equal to the expression on the right-hand side. Equations can be used to model a wide range of real-world situations, from simple algebraic problems to complex scientific and engineering applications.

Here,

A. Solving the equation for the variable a, we get:

2(x+a) = 4b

2x + 2a = 4b

2a = 4b - 2x

a = (4b - 2x)/2

a = 2b - x

Therefore, the solution for the variable a is a = 2b - x.

B. To solve for the variable a, we first used the distributive property to simplify the left side of the equation: 2(x + a) = 2x + 2a. We then subtracted 2x from both sides to isolate the term with the variable a on one side: 2x + 2a - 2x = 4b - 2x. We then divided both sides by 2 to isolate the variable a, giving us the solution a = (4b - 2x)/2. Finally, we simplified the expression to get a = 2b - x. The specific process we followed was to use basic algebraic operations, including the distributive property and isolating variables on one side of the equation, to solve for the given variable.

To know more about equation,

https://brainly.com/question/28243079

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

0.125

The probability that at least one missile will fire is 1 because the probability that none of the missiles will fire is 0. Therefore, the answer is (d) 30/30.

The complement of "at least 1 missile will fire" is "none of the missiles will fire." So we can find the probability of this happening, and then subtract it from 1 to get the probability that at least 1 missile will fire.

The probability that the first missile selected will not fire is 3/10.

Since the missile is not replaced after being fired, the probability that the second missile selected will not fire is 2/9 (since there are only 9 missiles left in the lot).

Similarly, the probability that the third missile selected will not fire is 1/8.

Finally, the probability that the fourth missile selected will not fire is 0/7 (since there is only 1 missile left in the lot).

Therefore, the probability that none of the missiles will fire is:

(3/10) * (2/9) * (1/8) * (0/7) = 0

So the probability that at least 1 missile will fire is:

1 - 0 = 1

Therefore, the answer is (d) 30/30.

To practice more questions about probability:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The regular hexagonal prism has a volume of about   [tex]2,598[/tex] cubic centimetres. However, this value will vary depending on the height and base edge values.

To calculate the volume of a typical hexagonal prism, take into account the height of the prism and the length of the base edge.

while the letter "h" stands for the prism's height. The formula below can be used to determine the volume of a regular hexagonal prism.  The letter "a" stands for the regular hexagon's base edge,

[tex]V = 3\sqrt3/2 \times a^2 \times h[/tex]

The square root of 3 times 3/2 is about equal to 33/2.

the volume if we know the dimensions of the base edge and height. I am unable to provide a specific response, though, because this inquiry did not include any measurements.

The volume would be as follows if we assumed that the base edge was 10 cm and the height was 20 cm:

[tex]V = 3\sqrt3/2 \times (10 cm)^2 \times 20 cm[/tex]

[tex]V \approx 2,598.0762[/tex]  cubic cm

Therefore, The regular hexagonal prism has a volume of about 2,598 cubic centimetres. However, this value will vary depending on the height and base edge values.

Learn more about prism here:

https://brainly.com/question/30679221

#SPJ1

The lengths of the diagonals of the kite in centimeters are approximately 20.32sqrt(15) cm and 10.16sqrt(15) cm. Let d1 and d2 be the lengths of the diagonals of the kite. We know that d1 = 2d2 (since one diagonal is twice as long as the other). The formula for the area of a kite is:

A = (1/2) * d1 * d2

Substituting d1 = 2d2, we get:

240 = (1/2) * 2d2 * d2

240 = d2^2

d2 = sqrt(240) = 4sqrt(15)

Substituting d2 = 4sqrt(15) into d1 = 2d2, we get:

d1 = 2 * 4sqrt(15) = 8sqrt(15)

Therefore, the lengths of the diagonals of the kite are d1 = 8sqrt(15) inches and d2 = 4sqrt(15) inches.

To convert these measurements to centimeters, we can use the conversion factor 1 inch = 2.54 centimeters:

d1 = 8sqrt(15) inches * 2.54 cm/inch = 20.32sqrt(15) cm

d2 = 4sqrt(15) inches * 2.54 cm/inch = 10.16sqrt(15) cm

Therefore, the lengths of the diagonals of the kite in centimeters are approximately 20.32sqrt(15) cm and 10.16sqrt(15) cm.

Learn more about diagonals

https://brainly.com/question/12274248

#SPJ4