2. Revisit question 6 of homework 2. You should have found that ged(18209, 19043) = 139. (a) Could 1 be expressed as an integral linear combination of 18209 and 19043? If so, give the linear combination. If not, explain why not. (b) Why is it that 40 cannot be expressed as an integral linear combination of 18209 and 19043? (c) Could 417 be expressed as an integral linear combination of 18209 and 19043? If so, give the linear combination. If not, explain why not.

To explain why a given graph can't be a solution of the differential equation $\frac{dy}{dt} = f(t,y)$, we need to check if the graph satisfies two conditions:The graph is continuous,The graph has a slope at every point that matches the function $f(t,y)$.

If either of these conditions is not satisfied, then the graph cannot be a solution of the differential equation.

In more detail, a function that is a solution of a differential equation must satisfy two criteria:

Existence: The function must exist on an interval containing the initial value $(t_0,y_0)$.

Uniqueness: The function must be unique in the sense that no other function that satisfies the differential equation and the initial condition can cross the graph of the given function.

If the graph of a function violates either the existence or uniqueness criteria, then it cannot be a solution of the differential equation.

It is important to note that a graph that does not satisfy the above conditions can still be a valid solution of a differential equation if we extend the definition of a solution to include generalized solutions that may not satisfy the existence and uniqueness criteria. However, these solutions may not be physically meaningful or may require additional constraints to be valid solutions in a specific context.

To learn more about slope : brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/4 would be c

Step-by-step explanation:

You have very four variables and you're looking for 3/4 so what you need is the third variable out of the four .

If all the second partial derivatives of a function exist and are continuous, then the order of taking derivatives does not matter for second derivatives. This statement is true.

1. The statement is a consequence of a mathematical concept known as Clairaut's theorem or Schwarz's theorem. According to this theorem, if a function f(x, y) has continuous second partial derivatives in a region, the order of taking the second partial derivatives with respect to x and y does not affect the result.

2. In other words, if f(x, y) is a function with continuous second partial derivatives, it implies that ∂²f/∂x² = ∂²f/∂y². This means that the mixed partial derivatives (∂²f/∂x∂y and ∂²f/∂y∂x) are equal.

3. The continuity of the second partial derivatives is crucial for this result to hold. If the second partial derivatives are not continuous, the order of taking derivatives may indeed affect the result. However, when all second partial derivatives exist and are continuous, the order of taking derivatives for second derivatives does not matter.

Learn more about Schwarz's theorem here: brainly.com/question/30402486

#SPJ11

Let's denote the time it takes for the student aide to complete the job alone as "x" minutes.

According to the given information, the teacher can assemble and staple the newsletter three times faster than the student aide. Therefore, the teacher's time to complete the job alone is "x/3" minutes.

When they work together, their combined work rate is the sum of their individual work rates. We can express this as:

1/x + 1/(x/3) = 1/21

To simplify the equation, we can multiply through by the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators,

which is 3x:

3 + 3/x = x/(21x)

Multiplying both sides of the equation by 21x:

63x + 63 = x^2

Rearranging the equation:

x^2 - 63x - 63 = 0

Now we can solve this quadratic equation for "x" using factoring, completing the square, or the quadratic formula.

Factoring is not straightforward in this case, so let's solve it using the quadratic formula:

x = (-(-63) ± sqrt((-63)^2 - 4(1)(-63))) / (2(1))

Simplifying:

x = (63 ± sqrt(3969 + 252)) / 2

x = (63 ± sqrt(4221)) / 2

Now, calculating the square root:

x ≈ (63 ± 64.98) / 2

We have two possible solutions:

x ≈ (63 + 64.98) / 2 ≈ 128.98 / 2 ≈ 64.49

or

x ≈ (63 - 64.98) / 2 ≈ -1.98 / 2 ≈ -0.99

Since time cannot be negative, we discard the negative solution.

Therefore, it would take the student aide approximately 64.49 minutes to complete the job alone, and the teacher, who is three times faster, would take approximately 21.50 minutes (64.49/3) to complete the job alone.

Learn more about quadratic formula here : brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

Answer:

4 because 2 quarts mean one-forth part of 8 which is 2 she buys 2 quarts of cup means 4 so the cups that will be left are 8-4=4

Answer:

2 cups of orange juice

Step-by-step explanation:

The best prediction possible for the number of times you will pick a green marble is  2 or 3 times.

Assuming that the marbles are well-mixed and that the probability of picking a green marble is constant, the best prediction for the number of times you will pick a green marble is equal to the expected value of the number of green marbles picked in 7 trials.

Let p be the probability of picking a green marble in one trial. Since there are no other details about the marble colors or quantities, we do not know the value of p. However, we can make the best prediction possible by assuming that all marble colors are equally likely, so that p = 1/3.

The number of green marbles picked in 7 trials can be modeled by a binomial distribution with parameters n = 7 and p = 1/3. The expected value of a binomial distribution with parameters n and p is np, so the best prediction for the number of times you will pick a green marble in 7 trials is:

E(number of green marbles) = np = 7 * (1/3) = 2.33

Since the expected value of a discrete random variable is not necessarily a whole number, the best prediction possible is that you will pick a green marble 2 or 3 times.

Learn more about prediction here

https://brainly.com/question/441178

#SPJ11

Answer:

b 16.4 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem using a graphing calculator, we need to plug in the value of q (which is given as 7) into the equation y = 2 csc e, and then graph the resulting equation.

First, we need to convert the angle e from degrees to radians, because the csc function takes its input in radians. We can use the conversion formula:

radians = degrees x (π/180)

So for e = 2, we have:

e (in radians) = 2 x (π/180) = 0.0349 radians

Now we can plug this value into the equation y = 2 csc e:

y = 2 csc(0.0349) ≈ 103.8 feet

This tells us that the length of the rafters needed to make the roof is approximately 103.8 feet. However, the question asks us to round to the nearest tenth of a foot, so the answer is:

y ≈ 103.8 feet ≈ 103.8 rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot

Therefore, the length of the rafters needed to make the roof for q 7" is approximately 103.8 feet, rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot.

So the correct answer is (b) 16.4 feet.

Using the graphing calculator, we find that the length of the rafters needed is approximately 16.4 feet, Therefore, the correct answer is option B, 16.4 feet.

To find the length of the rafters needed for the roof with an angle of 7 degrees, we'll use the given function y = 2 * csc(e), where e is the angle formed by the rafters and the top of the wall. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Convert the angle from degrees to radians: e (in radians) = (7 degrees * π) / 180 ≈ 0.1222 radians.

2. Calculate the cosecant  (csc) of the angle e: csc(0.1222) ≈ 8.185.

3. Plug the value of csc(e) into the function: y = 2 * 8.185 ≈ 16.37.
Using a graphing calculator, we can input the function y = 2 csc e and graph it. Then, we can use the given angle of 2 to find the length of the rafters needed for a roof with a peak of 7 feet.

4. Round the length to the nearest tenth of a foot: 16.37 ≈ 16.4 feet.
When we graph the function, we can see that the length of the rafters is the distance between the x-axis and the point on the graph where y = 7.
So, the length of the rafters needed to make the roof for an angle of 7 degrees is approximately 16.4 feet (Option b).

Learn more about feet:

brainly.com/question/20111809

#SPJ11

True. An annuity due is a series of equal payments made at the beginning of each period, while an ordinary annuity is a series of equal payments made at the end of each period.

Because payments made at the beginning of each period earn interest for one additional period, annuity due payments are worth more than equivalent ordinary annuity payments. This means that the present value of an annuity due must be larger than the present value of an equivalent ordinary annuity, assuming the same interest rate and number of payments.

Therefore, if we compare two annuities with the same payment amount, interest rate, and number of payments, the annuity due will always have a larger present value than the ordinary annuity. It is important to understand the difference between these two types of annuities as it can impact the amount of money you receive or need to save for your retirement.

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

The length of one side of the cube is approximately 6.75 feet.

The possible dimensions of the cube are 6.75 feet, 6.75 feet, and 6.75 feet, corresponds to option D: 6.75, 6.75, 6.75.

A cube's surface area, use the formula SA = 6s2, s is one of the cube's sides' lengths.

The surface area of the cube is 273.375 square feet, which enables us to formulate the equation shown below:

273.375 = 6s²

Divide both sides by 6 to get the following result: 45.5625 = s2.

Either -6.75 or 6.75 is the result of calculating the square root of both sides.

The answer is false since a length can never be zero.

Use the formula SA = 6s2 to get a cube's surface area, s denotes one of the cube's side lengths.

The cube has a surface area of 273.375 square feet, allowing us to create the equation below:

273.375 = 6s²

6 divided by both sides. get: 45.5625 = s2.

The result of taking the square root of both sides is either 6.75 or -6.75.

Since a length cannot be negative, the answer is negative.

For similar questions on cube

https://brainly.com/question/28776132

#SPJ11

The fraction that does not represent the part of the beads on the bracelet that are blue is 3/4.

Malia wants 1/4 of the beads to be blue. This means that if there are a total of x beads on the bracelet, then 1/4 of them are blue. We can represent this mathematically as:

Blue beads = 1/4 x

Now, we also know that the greatest number of beads that will fit on the bracelet is 20. This means that the total number of beads on the bracelet cannot be greater than 20. We can represent this mathematically as:

Total beads ≤ 20

To find the fraction that does not represent the part of the beads on the bracelet that are blue, we need to first find the fraction that represents the part of the beads on the bracelet that are blue. We already know that this fraction is 1/4.

Now, we can subtract this fraction from 1 to find the fraction that does not represent the part of the beads on the bracelet that are blue. Mathematically, we can represent this as:

Fraction not blue = 1 - 1/4

Simplifying this expression, we get:

Fraction not blue = 3/4

This means that if there are a total of x beads on the bracelet and 1/4 of them are blue, then 3/4 of them are not blue.

To know more about fraction here

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

Therefore, The report suggests a strong positive correlation between occupation and salary. However, it is not appropriate to draw conclusions about specific groups of workers based solely on the correlation coefficient.

The correlation coefficient r=0.89 suggests a strong positive relationship between occupation and the salary of workers. This means that as the occupation level increases, the salary also tends to increase. However, it is not appropriate to draw conclusions about specific groups of workers, such as blue-collar or white-collar workers, or professionals versus unskilled workers, based solely on the correlation coefficient. Other factors, such as education level, years of experience, and industry, can also impact salary. Therefore, the appropriate conclusion about the report is that there is a strong positive correlation between occupation and salary, but it is not enough to draw conclusions about specific groups of workers.

Therefore, The report suggests a strong positive correlation between occupation and salary. However, it is not appropriate to draw conclusions about specific groups of workers based solely on the correlation coefficient.

To know more about equations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22688504

#SPJ11

It has been proved that the matrix A has two distinct real eigenvalues if and only if k > 0.

Let's first define what eigenvalues and eigenvectors are:

Eigenvalues are scalars that represent how a linear transformation changes an eigenvector.

Eigenvectors are non-zero vectors that remain in the same direction when a linear transformation is applied to them.

Now, to find the eigenvalues of a matrix, we need to solve the characteristic equation:

det(A - λI) = 0

where A is the matrix, I is the identity matrix, and λ is the eigenvalue we want to find.

In our case, the matrix A is:

A = [-6 k     -1 -1]

So, the characteristic equation is:

det(A - λI) = (-6-λ)(-1-λ) - k = λ² + 7λ + 6 - k = 0

Now, we can use the quadratic formula to solve for λ:

[tex]\lambda = (-7 \pm \sqrt{(49 - 4(1)(6 - k)))} / 2[/tex]

Simplifying this expression gives:

[tex]\lambda = (-7 \pm \sqrt{(25 + 4k))} / 2[/tex]

We can see that this expression will only have distinct real roots if the discriminant (25 + 4k) is positive.

So, we have:

25 + 4k > 0

4k > -25

k > -25/4

Therefore, matrix A has two distinct real eigenvalues if and only if k > -25/4. However, we need to check whether these eigenvalues are positive or not.

Recall that the eigenvalues are:

[tex]\lambda_1 = (-7+ \sqrt{(25 + 4k))} / 2[/tex]

[tex]\lambda_2 = (-7 - \sqrt{(25 + 4k))} / 2[/tex]

If k > 0, then both λ₁ and λ₂ will be positive.

If k = 0, then λ₁ = -3.5 and λ₂ = 0, which means they are not both positive.

If k < 0, then λ₁ will be positive and λ₂ will be negative, which also means they are not both positive.

Learn more about eigenvalues:

https://brainly.com/question/15586347

#SPJ11

To evaluate the integral ∫132x2 5x dx using the fundamental theorem of calculus, we first need to find the antiderivative of the integrand.

Using the power rule of integration, we have:

∫132x2 5x dx = ∫13(5x)(x2) dx
= 5∫x3 dx
= 5 * (1/4)x4 + C  (where C is the constant of integration)

Thus, the antiderivative of the integrand is (1/4)x4, and the definite integral from x = 1 to x = 3 is:

(1/4)(3^4 - 1^4) = (1/4)(80) = 20

Therefore, using the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can evaluate the integral as:

∫132x2 5x dx = 20

where the fundamental theorem of calculus states that the definite integral of a function is equal to the difference between its antiderivative evaluated at the upper and lower limits of integration.
Hi! I'd be happy to help you evaluate the integral using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The given integral is: ∫(13x^2 + 5x) dx.

Step 1: Find the antiderivative of the given function.
The antiderivative of 13x^2 is (13/3)x^3, and the antiderivative of 5x is (5/2)x^2. So, the antiderivative of the function is F(x) = (13/3)x^3 + (5/2)x^2 + C, where C is the constant of integration.

Step 2: Apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus states that if F(x) is the antiderivative of a continuous function f(x) on the interval [a, b], then the definite integral of f(x) from a to b is equal to F(b) - F(a).

In this case, you didn't provide the limits of integration (a and b), so we can't complete the evaluation. However, if you have specific limits, simply substitute them into the antiderivative F(x) and find the difference F(b) - F(a) to get the final result.

To know more about integral visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

Therefore, the long-run aggregate supply curve is a vertical line that is not influenced by changes in aggregate demand or short-run economic conditions.

The long-run aggregate supply curve is represented by the vertical line at the potential output level, which indicates that in the long run, the economy will produce at its full capacity without any increase in inflation or decrease in unemployment.

In other words, the long-run aggregate supply curve is not affected by temporary fluctuations in prices or output levels, and instead represents the economy's natural rate of output in the absence of any short-term disturbances. Therefore, the long-run aggregate supply curve is a vertical line that is not influenced by changes in aggregate demand or short-run economic conditions.

To know more about long-run aggregate visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14804835

#SPJ11

From linear equations solution, janeen will need to work total 22.699 hours per week for make equal the amount that shari makes in a week.

We two persons named janeen and shari.

number of hours worked by janeen in a week = 20 hours

Amount of money janeen earned after working 20 hours in a week = $24.92

Number of hours worked by shari in a week = 12 hours

Let Janeen make amount in dollars = $x per hour

Shari make amount in dollars= $y per hour.

According to seniror, 12y - 20x = $24.92 --(1)

Shari makes one dollar less than twice the amount that Janeen makes per hour

=> y = 2x - 1 ---- (2)

Now, we have to linear equations and we have to solve these for determining the values of x and y. So, substitute value of y from equation (2) in (1)

=> 12 (2x -1) - 20x = 24.92

=> 24x - 12 - 20x = 24.92

=> 4x = 24.92 + 12

=> 4x = 36.92

=> x = 9.23

Therefore, Janeen earns $9.23 per hour.

Then, y = 2x-1

=> y = 2× 9.23 -1

=> y= $17.46

Now, shari makes in a week = $17.46 × 12

=$209.52

Janeen makes in a week = 20× $9.23

= $184.6

Janeen need to work to equal the amount that shari makes in a week = [tex]\frac{209.52}{9.23}[/tex]

= 22.699

Hence, required value is 22.699 hours.

For more information about linear equations, refer :

https://brainly.com/question/24085666

#SPJ4

The pattern that follows Alexa's rule is -10, -2, 6, 14, ...

Alexa's pattern is to start at -10 and then subtract -8 to find the next term.

When we subtract a negative number, it is the same as adding a positive number. So we can rephrase the pattern as starting at -10 and adding 8 to find the next term.

Using this pattern, we can find the next few terms:

-10 + 8 = -2

-2 + 8 = 6

6 + 8 = 14

So the pattern that follows Alexa's rule is:

-10, -2, 6, 14, ...

Each term is found by adding 8 to the previous term.

Learn more about pattern  here

https://brainly.com/question/27033681

#SPJ11

The value of solution of the system of equations is,

⇒ x = 5, y = 0

We have to given that;

The system of equations are,

x - y = 5      .. (i)

3x - 2y = 12  .. (ii)

From (i);

x = y + 5

Substitute above value in (ii);

3x - 2y = 12

3 (y + 5) - 2y = 12

3y + 12 - 2y = 12

y = 0

And, x = y + 5

x = 0 + 5

x = 5

Thus, The value of solution of the system of equations is,

⇒ x = 5, y = 0

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

Answer:

X= 36.86 ~ 37 °

Step-by-step explanation:

You use tan(x) inorder to solve x

tan(x) = 9/12

tan(x) = 3/4

x = tan^-1 (3/4)

X= 36.86 ~ 37 °

When the area is doubled, the number of species increases by a magnitude of 8.

a. To solve the equation for S, we have:

log S = log c + k log A

To remove the logarithms, use the property a^(log a(x)) = x, so we have:

S = 10^(log c + k log A)

S = 10^(log c) * 10^(k log A)

Since 10^(log x) = x, we get:

S = c * A^k

b. Using part (a), if k = 3 and the area is doubled, we need to find the magnitude by which the number of species is increased:

Let A1 be the initial area and A2 be the doubled area (A2 = 2A1). Find the ratio of the number of species in A2 to the number of species in A1:

S2/S1 = (c * (2A1)^3) / (c * A1^3)

S2/S1 = (c * 8 * A1^3) / (c * A1^3)

S2/S1 = 8

So, when the area is doubled, the number of species increases by a magnitude of 8.

learn more about the area:https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

Answer:

D) same side interior angles are supplementary

Step-by-step explanation:

In the attachment, yellow is what we're given and need to prove.

Green are the 2 angles that are congruent.

Blue are the 2 angles that we are given that are supplementary, with the reason that 2 angles forming a linear pair sum to 180 degrees.

Red are the 2 angles that are supplementary also, but have to find the reaosn.

We can use process of elimination as one way.

Option A is incorrect because we can see that the red angles aren't vertical.

Option B and C are incorrect because the statement isn't asking for congruency, it's asking for supplementary angles.

Option D is correct because it has to do with supplementary angles.

Also, these 2 angles are supplementary because they are same side interior angles with a transversal cutting through the 2 parallel lines.

Thus, option D is correct.

Hope this helps! :)

The length of a side of the equilateral triangle is 22 inches.

Let's denote the side length of the equilateral triangle as x inches.

According to the given information, the side length of the square is 2 inches longer than the side length of the triangle, so the side length of the square is (x + 2) inches.

The perimeter of the equilateral triangle is given by P_triangle = 3x inches.

The perimeter of the square is given by P_square = 4(x + 2) inches.

It is also given that the perimeter of the square is 30 inches more than the perimeter of the triangle, so we can set up the following equation:

P_square = P_triangle + 30

Substituting the values of the perimeters, we get:

4(x + 2) = 3x + 30

Simplifying the equation:

4x + 8 = 3x + 30

x = 22

Know more about equilateral triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/3461022

#SPJ11

The double exponential smoothing is an additive method. It is used to model trend and level components for the univariate times series data. So, option(d) is right one.

Additive relationships mean that you add the same number to any value of x to get the corresponding value of y, and are written as y = x + a. The basic idea behind double exponential smoothing is to introduce a term that accounts for the possibility that the series exhibits some form of trend. This slope component updates itself using exponential smoothing. ) is the trend smoothing factor. Double exponential smoothing is generally greater reliable for handling data that represents the trends compared to the single procedure. Double exponential smoothing with a linear trend. It therefore follows an additive trend (Holt's linear trend model). Therefore, option (d) is the correct choice.

For more information about exponential smoothing, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31358866

#SPJ4

Complete question :

double exponential smoothing is a(n) method. multiple choice question.

a)subtractive

b)multiplicative

c)divisive

d)additive

Answer:

At = 53yd^2

Step-by-step explanation:

A1 = L× W

= 4yd × 5 yd

= 20 yd^2

A2 = 1/2 bh

= 1/2 ( 11yd × 6yd)

= 33 yd^2

so area total will be their sum

AT = A1 + A2

= 20 yd^2 + 33 yd^2

= 53yd^2

The law of sines is solved for the triangle and C =28.7 units

Given data ,

Let the triangle be represented as ABC

Now , the measures of angles and sides are given as

Trigonometry's law of sines can be expressed as a/sinA = b/sinB = c/sinC, where a, b, and c are the lengths of the triangle's sides, and A, B, and C are the triangle's respective opposite angles.

Law of Sines :

a / sin A = b / sin B = c / sin C

c / sin ( 60 )° = 14 / sin ( 25 )°

Multiply by sin 60° on both sides , we get

c = 0.86602540378 ( 14 / 0.42261826174 )

On simplifying , we get

c = 28.688 units

Hence , the measure of c of triangle is c = 28.7 units

To learn more about law of sines click :

https://brainly.com/question/13098194

#SPJ1

Thus, the value of limit(x→∞) f(x)g(x) is 0, which corresponds to answer choice (a). 0

Given the functions f(x) = 2x * 3e^(-5x) and g'(x) = (1/x) * 4cos(5x), we are asked to find the value of lim(x→∞) [f(x)g(x)].

Since lim(x→∞) g(x) = ∞, we can use L'Hôpital's rule to evaluate the limit of the product f(x)g(x) as x approaches infinity.

To apply L'Hôpital's rule, we need to find the derivatives of both f(x) and g(x). We already have g'(x). Now let's find f'(x).

f'(x) = d/dx [2x * 3e^(-5x)] = 2 * 3e^(-5x) - 10x * 3e^(-5x) (by applying product and chain rule)

Now, let's apply L'Hôpital's rule:

lim(x→∞) [f(x)g(x)] = lim(x→∞) [f'(x)g'(x)]

Since both f'(x) and g'(x) go to 0 as x approaches infinity, the limit can be evaluated as:

lim(x→∞) [f'(x)g'(x)] = 0

Therefore, the value of lim(x→∞) f(x)g(x) is 0, which corresponds to answer choice (a).

Know more about the L'Hôpital's rule,

https://brainly.com/question/31585573

#SPJ11

The evidence from the text that supports the conclusion that Brutus and Cassius are in conflict are:

“Brutus, bay not me. / I’ll not endure it.”

“Away, slight man!”

We have,

“Brutus, bay not me. / I’ll not endure it.”

“Away, slight man!”

Both these lines show that Brutus and Cassius are having a heated argument and are in conflict.

The first line is Cassius telling Brutus not to attack him, and the second line is Cassius insulting Brutus by calling him a "slight man".

Thus,

The evidence from the text that supports the conclusion that Brutus and Cassius are in conflict are:

“Brutus, bay not me. / I’ll not endure it.”

“Away, slight man!”

Learn more about  Brutus and Cassius here:

https://brainly.com/question/11196132

#SPJ1

The population in 2010 was 55.5M.

Given that;

The country's population in 1992 =  50 million

The country's population in 2002 =  53 million

It is a positive exponential function because the population is growing

Let 1992 be the beginning of time, or t=0.

Thereore,

P = P₀[tex]e^{kt}[/tex]

⇒P = 50[tex]e^{kt}[/tex]

In 2002 the value of t = 10

⇒ 53 = 50[tex]e^{10t}[/tex]

⇒10k = log(53/50)

⇒   k =  0.00583

Number of years ⇒ t = 2010-1992 = 18

So population in 2010 is,

⇒P(20) = 50[tex]e^{18(0.00583)}[/tex]

⇒ 55.5

Answer be 55.5 M.

To learn more about exponential function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14355665

#SPJ1

The complete question is;

A country's population in 1992 was 50 million. In 2002 it was 53 million. Estimate the population in 2010 using the exponential growth formula. Round your answer to the nearest million. P = Aekt

The order of the calculations from greatest to least perimeter is:

Mika, Jason, Ashley, Leon.

To order the calculations from greatest to least perimeter, we need to evaluate each expression and compare the results.

Let's calculate the values for each person's calculation:

Leon: √17 - 2 ≈ 0.123

Mika: 1 + π/2 ≈ 2.571

Jason: 12/5 = 2.4

Ashley: 2.5

Now, we can order the calculations from greatest to least perimeter:

Mika: 2.571

Jason: 2.4

Ashley: 2.5

Leon: 0.123

Know more about perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ11

The length of JK in the triangle is 66.

There can be many different ways, one can include arc way, one can include angle bisector and perpendicular, and we can even try to discover some. But usually, (for the angle bisector and perpendiculars), we do the following:

Divide one of the angles in half.

Divide another angle in half.

The incenter, or point where they cross, is the inscribed circle's center.

Construct a perpendicular from the triangle's center point to one of its sides.

Draw an inscribed circle by placing the compass on the center point and adjusting the length to where the perpendicular crosses the triangle.

We are given that;

JA=9 AL=10 and CK=14

Now,

Adding them together

=10+9

=19.

CK is 14, so LK is 14.

Adding them together = 28.

The other side of the triangle is the same as JA plus AL, 19.

Hence, 19+19+28=66

Therefore, by the inscribed circle the answer will be 66

Learn more about inscribing circle here:

https://brainly.com/question/17043518

#SPJ1