3√2-√6+10√2
simplified form

The obtained value of chi-square for a one-way chi-square test is 1.76.

To conduct a one-way chi-square test, we need to set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis is that the proportion of people who prefer brand a is the same as 3/4 (the proportion from 5 years ago), while the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion has changed.

We can use a chi-square test statistic to compare the observed frequencies (62 people preferred brand a, 38 people preferred brand b) to the expected frequencies under the null hypothesis. The expected frequency for brand a is (62+38) * 3/4 = 75, and the expected frequency for brand b is (62+38) * 1/4 = 25.

Using these expected frequencies and the observed frequencies, we can calculate the chi-square test statistic as follows:

chi-square = (62-75)²/⁷⁵ + (38-25)²/²⁵

= 1.76

The degrees of freedom for a one-way chi-square test are equal to the number of categories minus 1, which in this case is 2-1=1. Using a chi-square distribution table with 1 degree of freedom, we can find the critical value for a given level of significance (e.g. 0.05). If the obtained chi-square value is greater than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of a change in preference.

Learn more about chi-square

https://brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ4

The sample space size for this experiment is the total number of possible outcomes. Since there are three coins and each coin can either land as heads or tails, there are 2 possible outcomes for each coin. Therefore, the sample space size for this experiment is 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 possible outcomes.

The sample space is the set of all possible outcomes of an experiment. In this experiment, we are tossing three coins, and each coin can land as either heads or tails. Therefore, there are two possible outcomes for each coin, and the total number of possible outcomes is obtained by multiplying the number of possible outcomes for each coin. Hence, the sample space size is 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 possible outcomes.

In conclusion, the sample space size for this experiment is 8 possible outcomes. This means that there are 8 possible combinations of heads and tails that can result from tossing three coins.

To know more abou probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The sample space size for this experiment is 281,474,976,710,656.

To find the sample space size for this experiment, we need to first determine the possible outcomes for each coin toss.

Since each coin can either land heads or tails, there are two possible outcomes for each toss.

Therefore, the sample space size for one coin toss is 2.

Now, since Doctor D tossed three coins at the same time, we need to find the total number of possible outcomes for all three coins.

To do this, we can use the multiplication principle, which states that the total number of possible outcomes for a sequence of events is equal to the product of the number of possible outcomes for each event.

So, for three coin tosses, the total number of possible outcomes is:
2 x 2 x 2 = 8

This means that there are 8 possible outcomes for each set of three coin tosses. Since Doctor D tossed the three coins 24 times, the total sample space size for this experiment is:
8 x 8 x 8 x ... (24 times)

This can be written as:
8^24

Using a calculator, we can determine that:
8^24 = 281,474,976,710,656

Therefore, the sample space size for this experiment is 281,474,976,710,656.

Know more about sample space here:

https://brainly.com/question/10558496

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

jack has error in 0 and -5x

The derivate of f(y) is -9y^6 - 33y^4 + 84y^2.

To differentiate the given function f(y), we will use the product rule and the chain rule of differentiation. Let's break down the function into two parts:

f(y) = (1 y^2 - 9 y^4) * (y + 3y^3)

Using the product rule, we can differentiate each part separately:

f'(y) = (1 y^2 - 9 y^4)' * (y + 3y^3) + (1 y^2 - 9 y^4) * (y + 3y^3)'

The derivative of the first part is:

(1 y^2 - 9 y^4)' = 2y - 36y^3

Now we need to differentiate the second part using the chain rule. Let's call the inner function u:

u = y + 3y^3

Using the power rule, the derivative of u with respect to y is:

u' = 1 + 9y^2

Now we can substitute these values back into our original equation:

f'(y) = (2y - 36y^3) * (y + 3y^3) + (1 y^2 - 9 y^4) * (1 + 9y^2)

Simplifying further:

f'(y) = 2y^2 + 6y^4 - 36y^4 - 108y^6 + y^2 + 9y^4 - 9y^6 + 81y^2

Combining like terms:

f'(y) = -9y^6 - 33y^4 + 84y^2

Therefore, the derivative of f(y) is -9y^6 - 33y^4 + 84y^2.

Visit here to learn more about chain rule:

brainly.com/question/28972262

#SPJ11

a) True. If lim n → [infinity] an = 0, then by definition of convergence, for any ε > 0 there exists an N such that for all n > N, |an| < ε. Thus, an is convergent.

b) False. If sin(20) > 0, then the series diverges (by comparison to the harmonic series), and if sin(20) ≤ 0, then the series oscillates and does not converge.

c) True. If lim n→[infinity] an = L, then by definition of convergence, for any ε > 0 there exists an N such that for all n > N, |an - L| < ε/2. Thus, for all n > N, |a(2n+1) - L| ≤ |a(2n+1) - an| + |an - L| < ε/2 + ε/2 = ε, so lim n→[infinity] a(2n+1) = L.

d) True. If −1 < α < 1, then as n→[infinity], αn approaches 0 from above (if α > 0) or below (if α < 0), and since it is always positive, it must approach 0.

e) False. For example, if an = (-1)^n and bn = (-1)^(n+1), then both sequences diverge but their sum is identically 0.

Know more about convergence here:

https://brainly.com/question/17019250

#SPJ11

The margin of error according to the given confidence interval is 0.4.

To compute the margin of error, EE, we first need to find the midpoint of the confidence interval. The midpoint is calculated by taking the average of the upper and lower bounds:

Midpoint = (12.73 + 14.33) / 2 = 13.53

Next, we need to find the distance from the midpoint to either the upper or lower bound. Since the confidence interval is symmetrical, we can use either bound:

Distance from midpoint to upper bound = 14.33 - 13.53 = 0.8

Finally, we divide the distance by 2 to get the margin of error:

EE = 0.8 / 2 = 0.4

Therefore, the margin of error for this confidence interval is 0.4. This means that we can be 95% confident that the true population mean falls within a range of 13.53 ± 0.4.

To learn more about margin of error visit : https://brainly.com/question/10218601

#SPJ11

S is countable, and the answer is (a) countably infinite.

To determine if S is countable or uncountable, we need to find a way to establish a one-to-one correspondence between the points in S and a countable set, such as the set of integers.

Let's first consider the constraint [x] < 1, which means that x must be in the open interval (-1,1). We can divide this interval into countably infinite subintervals of the form (1/n,1/(n-1)], where n is a positive integer greater than 1. For each subinterval, we can choose a representative point, say x_n, such that x_n is in the subinterval and x_n is not equal to 1/n.

For each x_n, we can determine the range of possible y values by using the equation x² + y² = 4.

Solving for y, we get y = ± sqrt(4 - x²).

Since we are only interested in the y values that satisfy the condition [x] < 1, we can restrict our attention to the positive square root and the range [0, sqrt(4 - x_n²)).

Thus, for each positive integer n, we can associate a countably infinite set of points in S of the form (x_n, y), where y ranges over the interval [0, sqrt(4 - x_n²)).

Moreover, the union of all these sets covers S, since any point in S must lie in one of the countably infinite subintervals of (-1,1], and hence correspond to a point in one of the sets.

Therefore, we have established a one-to-one correspondence between the points in S and a countably infinite set, namely the union of countably infinite sets associated with each subinterval of (-1,1]. Hence, S is countable, and the answer is (a) countably infinite.

Learn more about countability here, https://brainly.com/question/23713341

#SPJ11

kia uk accomplished should tesla implement such an engagement program Yes; Tesla should implement an engagement program similar to Kia UK's.

Kia UK's engagement program successfully increased brand awareness, customer loyalty, and sales. By hosting events, creating engaging content, and fostering a sense of community, Kia UK was able to create a positive and memorable experience for its customers. Tesla could benefit from a similar program by creating a stronger emotional connection with its customers and improving customer retention.

Overall, Tesla could benefit from implementing an engagement program similar to Kia UK's in order to improve customer loyalty and sales. By creating a positive and engaging experience for its customers, Tesla could strengthen its brand and foster a loyal customer base.

To learn more about fostering visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29762402

#SPJ11

The scale factor of Jayden's drawing is 400/3, which means that every unit of   measurement in the drawing represents 1/400th of a unit in real life.  

The scale factor of Jayden's drawing can be determined by dividing the real-life width of the back patio by its width in the drawing. In this case, the real-life width is 8 meters, while the width in the drawing is 6 centimeters. To make the units consistent, we need to convert meters to centimeters by multiplying by 100.

Thus, the real-life width of the back patio is 8 meters × 100 centimeters/meter = 800 centimeters. Dividing this by the width of the patio in the drawing (6 centimeters) gives us the scale factor:

Scale factor = 800/6 = 133.33

However, this is not a simplified fraction, so we need to divide both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor (GCF), which is 2 in this case. Dividing by 2 gives us:

Scale factor = 400/3

So the scale factor of Jayden's drawing is 400/3, which means that every unit of measurement in the drawing represents 1/400th of a unit in real life.

Learn more about measurement

brainly.com/question/4725561

#SPJ11

the appropriate z-factor to use when deriving a slope surface with the given horizontal and vertical units and resolutions is 0.1.

When deriving a slope surface, the z-factor represents the conversion factor from the vertical units to the horizontal units. In this case, the horizontal units are in feet with a horizontal resolution of 10, and the vertical units are also in feet but with a vertical resolution of 1. To calculate the appropriate z-factor for deriving a slope surface, we need to determine the ratio of the vertical to horizontal units.

The z-factor can be calculated as follows:

z-factor = vertical units / horizontal units

= 1 / 10

= 0.1

Therefore, the appropriate z-factor to use when deriving a slope surface with the given horizontal and vertical units and resolutions is 0.1.

To  learn  more about surface click here:brainly.com/question/28267043

#SPJ11

Marla reached her goal of running a 6 mile race on the 26th day. Therefore, it took her 26 days to reach 6 miles.

Marla set a goal to run a 6 mile race and took her some time to achieve it. According to the question, Marla reached her goal on the 26th day, which means it took her 26 days to reach 6 miles. It is possible that she may have missed some days of training, or she may have progressed slower than she expected, but ultimately, she accomplished her goal. Marla reached her goal of running a 6 mile race on the 26th day.

Learn more about running here

https://brainly.com/question/24712293

#SPJ11

The headings that best complete the chart are "x: frequency" and "y: amplitude".

The information in the chart suggests that column 1 is related to changes in the frequency of a wave, while column 2 is related to changes in the height of a wave. Based on this information, the headings that best complete the chart are:

x: frequency

y: amplitude

Frequency refers to the number of wave cycles that occur in a second, and it is typically measured in Hertz (Hz). Amplitude refers to the height of a wave from its resting position to the highest point of the wave. These terms accurately describe the information presented in the chart, so they are the best headings to complete the chart.

Therefore, the headings that best complete the chart are "x: frequency" and "y: amplitude".

Learn more about frequency here

https://brainly.com/question/254161

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct answer is option D, or:

X: FM

Y: AM

Step-by-step explanation:

Edgen 2023!

The substance is ground between the pestle and mortar, which is then used to create a powder. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

A mortar and pestle is a laboratory tool used to crush, grind, and mix materials such as chemicals and drugs into a powder. The mortar is a bowl, typically made of hard wood, ceramic, or stone. The pestle is a heavy and blunt club-shaped object, the end of which is used for crushing and grinding. The substance is ground between the pestle and mortar, which is then used to create a powder.

Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

To learn more about the probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923.

#SPJ1

The set of sides √3, √13 and 4 could be used to form a right angled triangle.

We know that,

An equation is an expression that is used to show the relationship between two or more numbers and variables.

Pythagoras theorem can be used to show the relationship between the sides of a right angled triangle. It is given by:

Hypotenuse² = Adjacent² + Opposite²

For a right triangle with sides √3, √13 and 4:

Using Pythagoras:

4² = (√3)² + (√13)²

16 = 3 + 13

16 = 16

The sides √3, √13 and 4 form a right angled triangle.

Find out more on equation at:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer: The  value of the expression is 3.

Definition of expression : Expressions in math are mathematical statements that have a minimum of two terms containing numbers or variables, or both, connected by an operator in between. The mathematical operators can be of addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division. For example, x + y is an expression, where x and y are terms having an addition operator in between. In math, there are two types of expressions, numerical expressions - that contain only numbers; and algebraic expressions- that contain both numbers and variables.

Explanation: Given : Expression: [tex]3^{\frac{1}{3} } . 9^{\frac{1}{3} }[/tex]

Solution : [tex]3^{\frac{1}{3} }[/tex] × [tex]9^{\frac{1}{3} }[/tex] =[tex]3^{\frac{1}{3} } +3^{\frac{2}{3} } = 3^{\frac{3}{3} } = 3[/tex]

To know more about expression visit

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

The length of the side r is given as follows:

r = 5.9

The theorem is expressed as follows:

c² = a² + b².

In which c is the length of the hypotenuse.

a and b are the lengths of the other two sides (the legs) of the right-angled triangle.

By the Triangle Theorem, the two sides have the same length, hence:

q = 6 yd

6/sin 43 = x

x = 5.9

More can be learned about the Pythagorean Theorem at brainly.com/question/30203256

#SPJ1

To find the minimum score of the top 2.5% of students, we need to calculate the z-score corresponding to the 97.5th percentile and then convert it back to the original SAT score scale.

First, let's calculate the z-score using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the SAT score, μ is the mean (1175), and σ is the standard deviation (120).

To find the z-score corresponding to the 97.5th percentile, we need to find the z-score value that leaves 2.5% in the tail of the distribution (to the right).

Using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the z-score corresponding to the 97.5th percentile is approximately 1.96.

Now we can solve for x (the SAT score) in the z-score formula:

1.96 = (x - 1175) / 120

Multiply both sides by 120:

1.96 * 120 = x - 1175

235.2 = x - 1175

Add 1175 to both sides:

235.2 + 1175 = x

1410.2 = x

Therefore, the minimum score of the top 2.5% of students is approximately 1410.

Learn more about z-score here : brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

The probability of winning the game by flipping 4 heads in a row is 1/128.

To win the game by flipping 4 heads in a row, we must first flip 3 tails in a row. The probability of flipping tails on any given flip is 1/2. So, the probability of flipping 3 tails in a row is (1/2) x (1/2) x (1/2) = 1/8.

Once we have flipped 3 tails in a row, we then need to flip 4 heads in a row. The probability of flipping heads on any given flip is also 1/2. So, the probability of flipping 4 heads in a row is (1/2) x (1/2) x (1/2) x (1/2) = 1/16.

To find the probability of winning by flipping 4 heads in a row, we need to multiply the probabilities of flipping 3 tails in a row and then flipping 4 heads in a row: (1/8) x (1/16) = 1/128.

Learn more about probability at: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

x < 5 and –6x – 5 < 10 – x

Step-by-step explanation:

For a yogurt consumer reports tested 11 brands,

a) The null and alternative hypothesis are

[tex]H_0 : \mu = 120[/tex]

[tex]H_a : \mu ≠ 120[/tex]

b) The 95% confidence interval for the average calorie content of vanilla yogurt is equals the (114.9, 148.8).

c) We fail to reject the null hypothesis [tex]H_0[/tex]. So, the claim is true.

We have yogurt consumer reports tested 11 brands vanilla yogurt. Also, there is data of number of calories per serving. Now, Consider the null and alternative hypothesis, [tex]H_0 : \mu = 120[/tex]

[tex]H_a : \mu ≠ 120[/tex]

Sample size, n = 11

Sample mean = 131.81

standard deviation = 25.23

degree of freedom = n - 1

df = 11 - 1 = 10

Here the conditions are randomization and normal conditions. For random, the survey was taken random sample and the brands are independent. And distribution is normal. So that the conditions are satisfied and we use t model with n-1 = 10 to determine mean t interval.

b) For 95% confidence interval

t value = 2.228

Now standard error [tex]=\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

substitute values in above formula, then

[tex]SE = \frac{25.23}{\sqrt{11}}[/tex]

= 7.61

Margin of error, ME = t × standard Error

= 2.228 × 7.61

= 16.95

Interval formula can be written as

= (mean - Margin of Error , mean + Margin of Error)

= (131.81 - 16.95 , 131.81 + 16.95)

Interval = (114.9, 148.8)

c) Here 95% confidence interval contain 120 and hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis [tex]H_0[/tex]. Hence,

For more information about confidence interval, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17097944

#SPJ4

The radius of the rubber ball is 9 cm.

The formula for the volume of a sphere is V = (4/3)πr^3, where V is the volume and r is the radius. We are given the volume of the rubber ball as 2,929 1/3π cm^3√3. Substituting this value for V, we get:

2,929 1/3π = (4/3)πr^3

Simplifying the equation, we can cancel out π from both sides:

2,929 1/3 = (4/3)r^3

Multiplying both sides by 3/4, we get:

(3/4) * 2,929 1/3 = r^3

Simplifying, we get:

2,196.75 = r^3

Taking the cube root of both sides, we get:

r = 9

Therefore, the radius of the rubber ball is 9 cm.

Learn more about radius here

https://brainly.com/question/27696929

#SPJ11

The distribution of the difference between sample means from two normal populations is also normal.

Specifically, if we have two independent random samples of sizes n1 and n2, drawn respectively from two normal populations with means μ1 and μ2 and standard deviations σ1 and σ2, the difference between the sample means (x1 - x2) follows a normal distribution with mean μ1 - μ2 and standard deviation given by:

σ(x1 - x2) = sqrt((σ1^2 / n1) + (σ2^2 / n2))

This formula is derived from the fact that the variance of the difference between two random variables is the sum of their variances if the two variables are independent. In this case, the random variables are the sample means x1 and x2.

It is important to note that this result holds only if the two populations are normal and the samples are independent. If the populations are not normal, but the sample sizes are large (i.e., n1 and n2 are both greater than or equal to 30), the Central Limit Theorem can be used to approximate the distribution of the difference between sample means as normal.

The normal distribution of the difference between sample means has important applications in statistical inference, such as in the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis testing. For example, we can use this distribution to test whether two population means are equal by comparing the difference between their sample means to a hypothesized value of zero, using the formula for the test statistic:

t = (x1 - x2 - d) / sqrt((s1^2 / n1) + (s2^2 / n2))

where d is the hypothesized difference between the population means and s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations. This test statistic follows a t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to (n1 - 1) + (n2 - 1), assuming equal variances in the two populations. If the p-value associated with this test statistic is less than the chosen level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis that the two population means are equal.

Learn more about Central Limit Theorem at: brainly.com/question/898534

#SPJ11

Of the three Ms, the median is especially useful when extreme figures may warp the average. It is because the median is the middle value in a set of data, and it is not affected by extreme values as the mean is.

The three Ms refer to the measures of central tendency: mean, median, and mode. These measures help summarize and describe a dataset.

In situations where extreme figures may distort the average, the median is particularly useful. The median is the middle value in a dataset when the data is arranged in ascending or descending order.

It is not affected by extreme values, also known as outliers, as it only considers the position of the middle value.

Unlike the mean, which takes into account all values and can be influenced by extreme figures, the median provides a more robust measure of central tendency.

It is resistant to the influence of outliers and extreme values, making it a suitable choice when extreme figures may warp the average.

Therefore, it provides a more accurate representation of the data.

To know more about median refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/30891252#

#SPJ11

The mean average of the four numbers is 20. This means that if we were to distribute the sum of 80 equally among four numbers, each number would be equal to 20.

The mean average of a set of numbers is the sum of all the numbers in the set divided by the total number of numbers in the set. In this case, we have a total of 4 numbers whose sum equals 80. To find the mean average, we need to divide the sum of the numbers by 4.

Mean average = sum of numbers / total number of numbers

Mean average = 80 / 4

Mean average = 20

Therefore, the mean average of the 4 numbers is 20. This means that if we were to distribute the sum of 80 equally among 4 numbers, each number would be equal to 20.

The mean average is an important measure of central tendency in statistics. It is used to describe the typical value or central value of a set of data. It is commonly used in various fields such as finance, economics, and science to summarize and analyze data.

The mean average is often used in conjunction with other measures of central tendency such as the median and mode to provide a complete picture of the data.

Learn more about mean here

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

The statement that proves how segments GH and FE are related is "They have the same slope of -2 and are, therefore, parallel."

The two conditions for the lines are given as,

The general equation of a line is given as y=mx+c, here m is the slope of the line, c is the y-intercept of the line and (x,y) are the coordinates of any point that is present on the line.

Comparing the general equation with the given equations of the line:

2x + y = 2

y = -2x + 2

y = mx + x

Therefore, the slope is -2 while the y-intercept is 2.

2x + y = 4

y = -2x + 4

y = mx + x

Therefore, the slope is -2 while the y-intercept is 4.

Since the slope of the two lines is the same while the y-intercept is different, therefore, they must be parallel to each other.

Hence, the correct option is D.

Learn more about the Slope of a line here:
https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ1

The equation is [tex]3x^{4}-75[/tex] has a polynomial factors [tex]3(x^{2} -5)(x^{2} +5)[/tex]. Thus, the option d is correct.

A polynomial having coefficients in a certain field or in integers is expressed as a combination of indivisible factors having coefficients in the exact same domain in math and computing algebra, which is known as polynomial factorization.

One of the essential building blocks of algorithms for computers is polynomial factorization.

The given equation is [tex]3x^{4}-75[/tex].

To solve for polynomial factors, take the like terms outside, we get

[tex]3x^{4}-75=3(x^{4} -25)[/tex]

Rewrite the terms [tex]x^4[/tex] as [tex](x^{2}) ^{2}[/tex], and [tex]25[/tex] as [tex]5^{2}[/tex].

[tex]3x^{4} -75=3((x^{2} )^{2} -5^2)[/tex]

By using the algebraic identity [tex]a^{2} -b^{2} =(a+b)(a-b)[/tex], we get

[tex]3x^{4} -75=3(x^{2} -5)(x^{2} +5)[/tex]

Hence, the option d is correct.

Read more about polynomial factorization:

brainly.com/question/11434122

To invest approximately $68,034.85 today at 11.99% interest compounded quarterly to achieve a future value of $100,000 in 10 years.

To determine how much you should invest today at 11.99% interest compounded quarterly to achieve a future value of $100,000 in 10 years, we can use the formula for compound interest:

FV = PV x (1 + r/n)^(n*t)

Where:

FV = Future value

PV = Present value (what you need to solve for)

r = Annual interest rate

n = Number of times interest is compounded per year

t = Time in years

Plugging in the given values, we get:

$100,000 = PV x (1 + 0.1199/4)^(4*10)

Simplifying the right side of the equation, we get:

$100,000 = PV x 1.4693

Dividing both sides by 1.4693, we get:

PV = $68,034.85

Therefore, you would need to invest approximately $68,034.85 today at 11.99% interest compounded quarterly to achieve a future value of $100,000 in 10 years.

Learn more about interest here

https://brainly.com/question/31261623

#SPJ11

There are approximately 33,020 miles on the odometer of your uncle's car.

If your mother's car odometer reads 29,580 miles and it is 3,440 miles less than your uncle's car odometer, then we can find the number of miles on your uncle's car odometer by adding 29,580 and 3,440.

29,580 + 3,440 = 33,020

Therefore, the odometer on your uncle's car reads approximately 33,020 miles. It's important to note that this is an estimation as we are not given the exact difference between the two odometer readings.

It's also worth noting that odometer readings are used to track the distance a car has traveled, which can be helpful for maintenance and resale purposes. However, it's important to keep in mind that the odometer reading is just one factor to consider when evaluating the condition and value of a used car.

Other factors such as the age of the car, its maintenance history, and any accidents or damage it may have sustained should also be taken into account.

Learn more about odometer here

https://brainly.com/question/30191072

#SPJ11

Answer:

(e - 7)(e + 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

If factored form is (e + a)(e + b), then a*b will equal the constant (last term, -35) and a+b will equal the second term’s coefficient (-2). Notice that -7*5 = -35 and -7+5 = -2. Thus, -7 and 5 will be values a and b:

(e - 7)(e + 5)

The correct statement is: As the number of penalty yards increases by 1, we predict time to increase by 0.01 hours. (Option 3)

This is because the regression equation shows that for each additional penalty yard, the predicted time increases by 0.01 hour, as indicated by the coefficient of 0.01 in the equation. The correlation coefficient of 0.61 indicates a moderate positive linear relationship between time and penalty yards.

However, it would be an extrapolation to use the regression equation to predict the time of a football game with 50 penalty yards since this value falls outside the range of penalty yards used to construct the equation.

Learn more about time

https://brainly.com/question/2073174

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

What affects the length, in hours, of a professional football game? Data was gathered in order to determine the relationship between total number of penalty yards and the time required to complete a game, in hours, for a large random sample of football games. All of these games had between 35 and 150 penalty yards. To predict time required to complete the game based on penalty yards, the following regression equation was constructed: Predicted time = 2.46 + 0.01 (penalty yards). The correlation between time and penalty yards is r = 0.61. Based on this information, which one of the following statements is correct?

Group of answer choices