(4x2 + 8x + 15) + (x2 − x − 27) − (x + 5)(x − 7)

The value of electric current best describing the given values of Power and Resistance is 2 Amperes.

The electric current is defined as the flow of electric charge across the conductor or current carrying wire.

We will keep the values of power and resistance in the provided formula to find the electric current.

I = ✓100/5

Beginning with taking the square of 100 at numerator on Right Hand Side of the equation

I = 10/5

Performing division on Right Hand Side of the equation to find the value of current

I = 2 Amperes

Hence, the value of electric current is 2 Amperes.

Learn more about electric current -

https://brainly.com/question/1100341

#SPJ4

No, there is no closure property of subtraction that applies to whole numbers.

We have,

The closure property states that when you perform an operation on two numbers from a certain set, the result will always be within that same set. In the case of subtraction, if the closure property were to hold, it would mean that when you subtract two whole numbers, the result would always be a whole number.

However, this is not true for all cases of subtraction with whole numbers. For example, if you subtract a larger whole number from a smaller whole number, the result can be a negative number, which is not a whole number.

For instance, if you subtract 5 from 3, you get -2, which is not a whole number.

Since not all subtractions of whole numbers result in whole numbers, the closure property does not hold for subtraction in the set of whole numbers.

Thus,

No, there is no closure property of subtraction that applies to whole numbers.

Learn more about closure property here:

https://brainly.com/question/32679358

#SPJ4

The system of equations x + y = 7 has infinitely many solutions. For the equation 2x + 2y = ?, there are also infinitely many solutions.

When we have a system of linear equations, the number of solutions can vary. In this case, the equation x + y = 7 represents a straight line in the xy-plane. Any point (x, y) that lies on this line satisfies the equation. Since the line extends infinitely in both directions, there are infinitely many solutions to this equation.

For the equation 2x + 2y = ?, it is equivalent to the first equation multiplied by 2. Multiplying an equation by a nonzero constant does not change the solutions of the equation. Therefore, any point that satisfies the equation x + y = 7 will also satisfy the equation 2x + 2y = ?. As a result, there are infinitely many solutions to this equation as well.

To know more about systems of equations, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32645146#

#SPJ11

Using trend-adjusted exponential smoothing with alpha = 0.1 and beta = 0.2, the forecast for the architectural firm's August income is $94.92 thousand dollars. The mean squared error (MSE) for this forecast is 2.12 [tex](thousand dollars)^2[/tex].

Trend-adjusted exponential smoothing combines exponential smoothing with a trend adjustment factor. The forecast for a given period is calculated based on the previous forecast and the previous trend value. In this case, the initial forecast for February is given as $85.0 thousand dollars, and the initial trend adjustment is 0.

To calculate the forecast for each month, we use the following formulas:

Level forecast = Previous level forecast + Previous trend adjustment

Trend forecast = Previous trend forecast + Beta * (Current level forecast - Previous level forecast)

Forecast for next period = Level forecast + Trend forecast

Using these formulas, we can calculate the forecasts for each month from February to July. Then, for August, we can apply the trend adjustment formula using the previous level forecast and trend forecast. The resulting forecast for August is $94.92 thousand dollars.

The mean squared error (MSE) is a measure of the accuracy of the forecast. It is calculated by taking the average of the squared differences between the actual income values and the forecasted values. In this case, the MSE for the forecast developed using trend-adjusted exponential smoothing is 2.12 [tex](thousand dollars)^2[/tex]. A lower MSE indicates a better fit between the forecast and the actual data.

Learn more about MSE here:

https://brainly.com/question/30763770

#SPJ11

The simplest form of the expression, after performing the required rationalization is 4*∛5.

We use the basic principles of solving irrational terms and numbers to arrive at the answer.

Let's denote the expression by E.

E = ∛4 * ∛80

We can write ∛80 in simpler ways are shown.

E = ∛4 * ∛(20*4)

  = ∛4 * ∛4 * ∛20                       ( ∛ab =  ∛a * ∛b )

  = ∛(4²) * ∛20

  = ∛16 * ∛20

We can write 16 = 2⁴, which gives us:

E = ∛2⁴ * ∛20

  = ∛2⁴ * ∛2*10

  = ∛2⁴ * ∛2 * ∛10                    (Property of Exponents)

  = ∛2³ * ∛2² * ∛10

  = 2*∛4 * ∛10

  = 2 * ∛40

  = 2 * ∛8 * ∛5

  = 2*2* ∛5

  = 4*∛5

Thus, we obtain the simplest form of the given exponent equation, which is 4*∛5.

For more on Exponents,

brainly.com/question/14595765

#SPJ4

We would need to sell at least $100,000 of jewelry each year for Option A to produce a larger income than Option B.

To determine the minimum sales required for Option A to produce a larger income than Option B, we can set up the following equation:

15,000 + 0.11x > 21,000 + 0.05x

Where x represents the amount of jewelry sales in dollars.Let's solve the equation to find the minimum sales required:

0.11x - 0.05x > 21,000 - 15,000

0.06x > 6,000

x > 6,000 / 0.06

x > 100,000

Therefore, you would need to sell at least $100,000 of jewelry each year for Option A to produce a larger income than Option B.

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ11

To calculate the equity after 5, 10, and 20 years, disregarding appreciation, we need to consider the concept of equity and its relationship to loan repayment.

Equity represents the portion of an asset that the owner truly owns, and it increases as the loan is paid off. Assuming the equity is calculated based on the initial loan amount and regular payments, we can determine the equity at different time points using an amortization schedule.

An amortization schedule outlines the repayment of a loan over time, indicating the principal and interest portions of each payment. By analyzing the schedule, we can determine the equity at various points. Let's assume a loan with a 13-year term, quarterly payments, and a 9.6% interest rate. To calculate the equity after 5 years, we need to determine the number of payments made in that period.

Since there are four payments per year, after 5 years, there would be 5 * 4 = 20 payments made. Using an amortization schedule, we can find the principal portion of the 20th payment and subtract it from the initial loan amount to determine the equity. Similarly, to find the equity after 10 years, we calculate the number of payments made in that period (10 * 4 = 40 payments) and subtract the principal portion of the 40th payment from the initial loan amount.

For the equity after 20 years, we consider the total number of payments made (20 * 4 = 80 payments) and subtract the principal portion of the 80th payment from the initial loan amount. By following this approach, we can determine the equity at each time point. Remember to round the answers to the nearest cent as specified.

Learn more about payment here: brainly.com/question/32320091

#SPJ11

The first and second derivatives do affect whether the trapezoidal rule overestimates or underestimates the area.

In general, the trapezoidal rule is a numerical integration method that approximates the area under a curve by dividing it into trapezoids. The rule assumes that the curve between two points can be approximated by a straight line segment. If the curve is concave up (meaning its second derivative is positive), the trapezoidal rule tends to underestimate the area. Conversely, if the curve is concave down (meaning its second derivative is negative), the trapezoidal rule tends to overestimate the area.

To understand why this happens, let's consider a concave up curve. In this case, the second derivative is positive, indicating that the curve is increasing at an increasing rate. When the trapezoidal rule approximates the curve by straight line segments, it "cuts off" some of the area under the curve, resulting in an underestimate.

On the other hand, for a concave down curve, the second derivative is negative, indicating that the curve is decreasing at an increasing rate. In this scenario, the trapezoidal rule "extends" the curve beyond its actual shape, leading to an overestimate of the area.

It's important to note that the accuracy of the trapezoidal rule depends on the number of trapezoids used and the spacing between them. With a large number of trapezoids or smaller spacing, the approximation tends to be more accurate regardless of the curvature of the curve.

To know more about numerical integration methods and their properties, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28990411#

#SPJ11

There is a total of 15 yes/no questions on the test. Hence, 15 is the correct answer.

Let's assume the number of yes/no questions on the test is represented by 'x'. The number of multiple-choice questions would then be '20 - x' since the test consists of a total of 20 questions.

The points obtained from yes/no questions can be calculated as 3 times the number of yes/no questions, which is 3x.

Similarly, the points obtained from multiple-choice questions can be calculated as 11 times the number of multiple-choice questions, which is 11(20 - x).

Since the total points for the test are 100, we can set up the equation:

     [tex]3x + 11(20 - x) = 100[/tex]

or, [tex]3x + 220 - 20x = 100[/tex]

or, [tex]8x = 120[/tex]

or, [tex]x = 15[/tex]

Therefore, the total number of yes/no questions on the test is 15.

Learn more about Linear equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/32634451

#SPJ11

The value of sin 3[tex]0^\circ[/tex] is equal to 1/2 in fractions and 0.5 in decimals.

We are given that we have to use a special right triangle to express the given trigonometric ratio both in fractions and as a decimal to the nearest hundredth. We will split the special equilateral triangle into two right triangles as shown in the image below.

Now, we can find out the value of a given trigonometric ratio with the help of these triangles. The angle we have to consider is 3[tex]0^\circ[/tex]. So the perpendicular will be the opposite side of that angle. Therefore, the value of the perpendicular is 1.

sin 30 = Perpendicular/Hypotenuse

Perpendicular = 1

Base = 2

Substituting the values;

sin 30 = 1/2

In fraction, sin 30 = 1/2. If we convert it to decimal, we get;

1/2 = 0.5

In decimal, sin 30 = 0.5

Therefore, the value of sin 3[tex]0^\circ[/tex] is equal to 1/2 in fractions and 0.5 in decimals.

To learn more about trigonometric ratios;

https://brainly.com/question/10417664

#SPJ4

The sentence is false. The correct sentence to make it true would be: "If a parallelogram is a rectangle, then the diagonals are equal in length."

In a parallelogram, opposite sides are parallel, and in a rectangle, all angles are right angles. However, being a rectangle does not necessarily guarantee that the diagonals are congruent (i.e., of equal length).

In a rectangle, the diagonals are indeed equal in length because the opposite sides are congruent and the diagonals bisect each other at right angles. This property holds true specifically for rectangles.

On the other hand, in a general parallelogram, the diagonals bisect each other but may not necessarily have the same length. Therefore, the original statement, "If a parallelogram is a rectangle, then the diagonals are congruent," is false.

By modifying the statement to say, "If a parallelogram is a rectangle, then the diagonals are equal in length," it accurately reflects the property specific to rectangles, where the diagonals are indeed equal.

Visit here to learn more about parallelogram brainly.com/question/32033686

#SPJ11

The composition function (f∘g)(x) is equal to x²-4x+5, which means the correct answer is option a .[tex]x^{2} - 4 x+5.[/tex]

To find (f∘g)(x), we need to substitute g(x) into f(x), resulting in f(g(x)). Given that g(x) = x−2, we substitute x−2 into f(x) as follows:

f(g(x)) = f(x−2) = (x−2)² + 1

Expanding the squared term, we have:

f(g(x)) = x² - 4x + 4 + 1

Simplifying further, we obtain:

f(g(x)) = x²-4 x+5.

Therefore, the correct answer is (f∘g)(x) = x²-4 x+5, which corresponds to option a. This means that the composition of functions f and g, when applied to x, results in the polynomial x²-4 x+5.

Learn more about composition function here : https://brainly.com/question/30660139

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option b:

X'(1,5), Y'(-3,-5), Z'(3,-1)

To reflect a point across the line y=x, we need to swap the x-coordinate with the y-coordinate of each point.

Given the points:

X(5,1), Y(-5,-3), and Z(-1,3)

When reflecting across the line y=x, the new coordinates will be:

X' = (1, 5)

Y' = (-3, -5)

Z' = (3, -1)

Comparing the reflected coordinates with the given options:

a. X'(-5,-1), Y'(5,3), Z'(1,-3) -> Not correct.

b. X'(1,5), Y'(-3,-5), Z'(3,-1) -> Correct.

c. X'(-1,-5), Y'(3,5), Z'(-3,1) -> Not correct.

d. X'(5,1), Y'(-5,-3), Z'(-1,3) -> Not correct.

The correct answer is option b:

X'(1,5), Y'(-3,-5), Z'(3,-1)

Learn more about coordinate  from

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ11

Answer:

So the missing pairs would be "GK, FD, and EC."

Explanation:

We can observe that the first letter of each pair follows a consecutive alphabetical order, while the second letter of each pair follows a reverse alphabetical order.

The criterion used to obtain the ordinary least square (OLS) estimator is to minimize the sum of the squared differences between the observed values and the predicted values.

In OLS, the goal is to find the line that best fits the given data points. The estimator minimizes the sum of the squared residuals, which are the differences between the observed values and the predicted values. The squared residuals are used to ensure that both positive and negative differences contribute to the overall error measure.

The OLS estimator achieves this by calculating the coefficients of the linear regression model that minimize the sum of the squared residuals. It finds the intercept and slope of the line that minimizes the total squared distance between the data points and the regression line. This minimization process is based on the principle of least squares, which aims to find the best-fitting line by minimizing the overall error.

By minimizing the sum of the squared residuals, the OLS estimator provides a measure of how well the regression line represents the data points. It allows for the determination of the line's slope and intercept, which can be used for predicting values and understanding the relationship between the variables.

Learn more about coefficients here: brainly.com/question/13431100

#SPJ11

Answer:Your mum

Step-by-step explanation::)

The expression 81z² + 36z + 4 cannot be factored further into a product of two binomials, as the discriminant is zero, the expression has a double root, which means it cannot be factored into a product of two binomials.

To factor the expression 81z² + 36z + 4, we can look for two binomial factors in the form (az + b)(cz + d), where a, b, c, and d are constants.

To determine the values of a, b, c, and d, we need to find two numbers whose product is equal to the coefficient of the squared term (81z²) and whose sum is equal to the coefficient of the linear term (36z).

In this case, there are no such numbers, which means the expression cannot be factored into a product of two binomials.

We can verify this by calculating the discriminant of the quadratic equation associated with the expression.

The discriminant is given by the formula b² - 4ac.

If the discriminant is negative, then the quadratic equation has no real solutions, which indicates that the expression cannot be factored into linear binomials.

In this case, a = 81, b = 36, and c = 4. Calculating the discriminant:

Discriminant = b² - 4ac

= (36)² - 4(81)(4)

= 1296 - 1296

= 0.

Since the discriminant is zero, the expression has a double root, which means it cannot be factored into a product of two binomials.

Therefore, the expression 81z² + 36z + 4 cannot be factored further into a product of two binomials.

To learn more on Expression click:

https://brainly.com/question/33893992

#SPJ4

The expression equivalent to 106 is "10 times 10 times 10 times 10 times 10," representing the repeated multiplication of 10.

In the expression, each multiplication of 10 represents raising 10 to power.

Since there are five 10s multiplied together, it signifies 10 raised to the power of 5.

Simplifying this, we get 10,000.

Therefore, the expression "10⋅10⋅10⋅10⋅10" is equivalent to 10,000 or 106.

It is important to understand the concept of exponentiation and how repeatedly multiplying a number by itself can be represented using exponent notation.

Learn more about Expressions click here :brainly.com/question/24734894

#SPJ11

Answer:

curved, quadratic, always decreasing

Step-by-step explanation:

A tangent function does not have an amplitude. The amplitude of a periodic function is the distance between its maximum and minimum values.

The tangent function does not have a maximum or minimum value, so it does not have an amplitude. The tangent function oscillates between -∞ and ∞, meaning that it can take on any real number value. This is because the tangent function is defined as the ratio of the sine and cosine functions, which are both periodic functions with an amplitude of 1.

The graph of a tangent function is a sawtooth wave that never reaches a maximum or minimum value. This is because the tangent function is not periodic in the same way that sine and cosine functions are. Sine and cosine functions have a period of 2π, which means that they repeat their values after a horizontal shift of 2π. The tangent function, on the other hand, has a period of π, which means that it repeats its values after a horizontal shift of π.

In conclusion, the tangent function does not have an amplitude because it does not have a maximum or minimum value.

To learn more about tangent function click here : brainly.com/question/30162652

#SPJ11

The equation for the line passing through (-1, -10) and parallel to y = 7 can be expressed as y = -10.

To find the equation of a line parallel to y = 7 and passing through the point (-1, -10), we can use the slope-intercept form of a linear equation, which is y = mx + b, where m represents the slope and b represents the y-intercept. Since the line is parallel to y = 7, the slope of the new line will also be 0. Therefore, the equation for the line passing through (-1, -10) and parallel to y = 7 can be written as y = 0x + b, or simply y = b.

In summary, the equation for the line passing through (-1, -10) and parallel to y = 7 is y = b, where b represents the y-intercept.

The given line y = 7 is a horizontal line with a slope of 0, as it has a constant y-value of 7. Since the new line we're trying to find is parallel to this line, it will also have a slope of 0.

To determine the equation of the line passing through (-1, -10), we need to find the value of b, which represents the y-intercept. The y-intercept is the point where the line intersects the y-axis.

Given that the line passes through (-1, -10), we can substitute these coordinates into the equation y = b:

-10 = b

Therefore, the equation for the line passing through (-1, -10) and parallel to y = 7 can be expressed as y = -10.

Learn more about determine here

brainly.com/question/30795016

#SPJ11

The z-score of a value that is 2.08 standard deviations greater than the mean is 2.08.

To find the z-score of a value that is 2.08 standard deviations greater than the mean, we can use the formula for z-score:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the given value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

We are given that the value is 2.08 standard deviations greater than the mean. This means that the distance between the value and the mean is 2.08 times the standard deviation. We can represent the value as:

x = μ + (2.08 * σ)

Substituting this into the formula for z-score, we get:

z = ((μ + 2.08σ) - μ) / σ

Simplifying the expression, we get:

z = (2.08 * σ) / σ

The standard deviation terms cancel out, leaving us with:

z = 2.08

Therefore, the z-score of a value that is 2.08 standard deviations greater than the mean is 2.08. A positive z-score indicates that the value is above the mean by a certain number of standard deviations. In this case, the value is 2.08 standard deviations above the mean.

The z-score can be used to determine the relative position of the value within the distribution and to calculate probabilities using the standard normal distribution table.

learn more about standard deviations here

https://brainly.com/question/13336998

#SPJ11

In the two-column proof above, we start with the given information that ΔMLP is an isosceles triangle and that N is the midpoint of side MP. Then, using definitions and properties of congruent triangles, we prove that LN is perpendicular to MP.

The key steps in the proof include recognizing LN as a perpendicular bisector, establishing congruence between ΔNLP and ΔNPL, and concluding that ∠NLP and ∠NPL are right angles, thus demonstrating the perpendicular relationship between LN and MP.

Learn more about congruent triangles here: brainly.com/question/28565216

#SPJ11

The committee's preference is determined by majority voting. Each committee member has their own preference ranking for the options. Using the given preferences of Rita, Sid, and Tina, we can derive a utility function representing the committee's preference. However, when Rita is replaced by Ray, the new committee's preference may not be representable by a utility function.

To represent the committee's preference with a utility function, we assign utility levels to the options based on the given preferences. Let's denote the options as A, B, C, and D. From Rita's preference (ABD > C), we can assign a higher utility to options A, B, and D compared to option C. Sid's preference (B > D > A > C) implies that B has the highest utility, followed by D, A, and then C. Tina's preference (C > B > A > D) suggests that C has the highest utility, followed by B, A, and then D. Combining these preferences, we can assign utility levels to the options: U(A) > U(B) > U(C) > U(D).

When Rita is replaced by Ray, Ray's preference (A > D >> B) introduces a change in the committee's decision. To determine the new committee's preference, we need to consider all possible pairs of options and determine the majority preference in each case. For example, for the pair (A, B), Sid prefers B, Tina prefers A, and Ray prefers A. Thus, the majority preference is A > B. Similarly, we can analyze the preferences for other pairs and determine the committee's preference. However, it is important to note that the new committee's preference may not be representable by a utility function since it might not satisfy rationality properties such as transitivity or completeness. Utility functions are typically used to represent rational preferences, and in this case, the committee's preference might not adhere to rationality assumptions.

Learn more about utility function here:

https://brainly.com/question/32733866

#SPJ11

The apothem of a polygon is the perpendicular distance between the center of the polygon and any side of the polygon is False statement.

The apothem of a polygon is the perpendicular distance between the center of the polygon and any side of the polygon.

The apothem is not the perpendicular distance between any two parallel bases.

In a polygon, the bases are usually referred to as the top and bottom sides of the polygon (for example, in a trapezoid). The apothem, however, is a measurement from the center of the polygon to any side, and it is always perpendicular to that side.

Learn more about Apothem here:

https://brainly.com/question/31280798

#SPJ4

The x component of the displacement is incorrect and needs to be recalculated. The y component of the displacement can be determined using trigonometry.

To find the x component of the displacement, we need to determine the horizontal distance covered in the given direction. The angle of 153 degrees above the positive x-axis suggests that the direction deviates from the positive x-axis in a counterclockwise direction. Since the angle is measured from the positive x-axis, it falls in the second quadrant.

To calculate the x component, we can use trigonometry. The x component is given by the formula:

x = displacement * cos(angle)

In this case, the displacement is 75 m, and the angle is 153 degrees. Converting the angle to radians (since trigonometric functions in most programming languages use radians), we have:

x = 75 m * cos(153°) = -71.61 m (rounded to two significant figures)

Therefore, the x component of the displacement is -71.61 m.

For Part B, to determine the y component of the displacement, we again use trigonometry. The y component is given by the formula:

y = displacement * sin(angle)

Using the same values as before, we have:

y = 75 m * sin(153°) = 43.50 m (rounded to two significant figures)

Therefore, the y component of the displacement is 43.50 m.

Learn more about trigonometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/11016599

#SPJ11

For the given sets of demand and supply equations:

(a) Equilibrium price = $12, Equilibrium quantity = 84.

(b) Equilibrium price = $15, Equilibrium quantity = 25.

(c) Equilibrium price = $500, Equilibrium quantity = 3625.

For the demand equation Qd = 96 - P and the supply equation Qs = 7P, we can find the equilibrium price and quantity by setting the quantity demanded equal to the quantity supplied:

Qd = Qs

96 - P = 7P

Combining like terms, we get:

8P = 96

Dividing both sides by 8, we find:

P = 12

Substituting the equilibrium price (P = 12) back into either the demand or supply equation, we can determine the equilibrium quantity:

Qd = 96 - P

Qd = 96 - 12

Qd = 84

Therefore, the equilibrium price is P = $12 and the equilibrium quantity is Q = 84.

For the demand equation Qd = 70 - 3P and the supply equation Qs = 10 + P, we set Qd equal to Qs:

Qd = Qs

70 - 3P = 10 + P

Combining like terms, we have:

4P = 60

Dividing both sides by 4, we find:

P = 15

Substituting the equilibrium price (P = 15) back into either the demand or supply equation, we can determine the equilibrium quantity:

Qd = 70 - 3P

Qd = 70 - 3(15)

Qd = 70 - 45

Qd = 25

Therefore, the equilibrium price is P = $15 and the equilibrium quantity is Q = 25.

For the demand equation Qd = 4000 - 0.75P and the supply equation Qs = 2000 + 3.25P, we set Qd equal to Qs:

Qd = Qs

4000 - 0.75P = 2000 + 3.25P

Combining like terms, we get:

4P = 2000

Dividing both sides by 4, we find:

P = 500

Substituting the equilibrium price (P = 500) back into either the demand or supply equation, we can determine the equilibrium quantity:

Qd = 4000 - 0.75P

Qd = 4000 - 0.75(500)

Qd = 4000 - 375

Qd = 3625

Therefore, the equilibrium price is P = $500 and the equilibrium quantity is Q = 3625.

These values represent the price and quantity at which the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied, indicating market equilibrium.

Learn more about equilibrium price here:

https://brainly.com/question/33629986

#SPJ11

The mean of the given set (1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 10, 12, 20) is approximately 6.64, and the standard deviation is approximately 5.76.

To find the mean of a set of values, we sum all the numbers and divide by the total count.

For the given set, the sum is 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 10 + 12 + 20 = 93.

Since there are 14 values in the set, the mean is 93 / 14 ≈ 6.64.

To calculate the standard deviation, we first find the squared deviation of each value from the mean, sum them, divide by the count, and then take the square root.

After performing the calculations, the standard deviation of the set is approximately 5.76.

Therefore, the mean of the set is approximately 6.64 and the standard deviation is approximately 5.76.

Learn more about Standard deviation click here :brainly.com/question/13708253

#SPJ11

The solution to the matrix equation is [x; y] = [16; -22].

To solve the matrix equation [2 1; 4 3] [x; y] = [10; -2], we can use matrix algebra.

To find the inverse, we the determinant of the coefficient matrix:

det([2 1; 4 3]) = (2 * 3) - (1 * 4) = 6 - 4 = 2

Since the determinant is non-zero (2 ≠ 0), the coefficient matrix has an inverse.

Next, we find the inverse of the coefficient matrix:

[2 1; 4 3]⁻¹ = (1/det([2 1; 4 3]))  [3 -1; -4 2]

           = (1/2)  [3 -1; -4 2]

           = [3/2 -1/2; -2 1]

Now,[x; y] = [3/2 -1/2; -2 1] [10; -2]

      = [3/2 * 10 + (-1/2) * (-2); -2 * 10 + 1 * (-2)]

      = [15 + 1; -20 - 2]

      = [16; -22]

Therefore, the solution to the matrix equation is [x; y] = [16; -22].

Learn more about Inverse of Matrix here:

https://brainly.com/question/28097317

#SPJ4

The x-coordinates of the points of intersection between two functions, f(x) and g(x), are the solutions to the equation f(x) = g(x).

When two functions, f(x) and g(x), intersect, it means that their y-values are equal at those points. In other words, f(x) = g(x).

To find the x-coordinates of the points of intersection, we set the two functions equal to each other and solve for x.

This process involves algebraic manipulation to isolate x. The resulting values of x that satisfy the equation f(x) = g(x) represent the x-coordinates of the points of intersection.

By substituting these x-values back into either f(x) or g(x), we can determine the corresponding y-values.

Thus, the x-coordinates of the points of intersection are the solutions to the equation f(x) = g(x), indicating the values at which the two functions intersect on the coordinate plane.

learn more about equation click here:brainly.com/question/13763238

#SPJ11