50 Points! Multiple choice geometry question. Photo attached. Thank you!

The solution to the equation sqrt 2-3x / sqrt 4x = 2 is x = -2/3.

To solve the equation, we must first clear the denominators and simplify the equation. We can do this by multiplying both sides by sqrt(4x) and then squaring both sides. This gives us:
sqrt 2-3x = 4sqrt x
2 - 6x + 9x² = 16x
9x² - 22x + 2 = 0
Using the quadratic formula, we can find that x = (-b ± sqrt(b² - 4ac)) / 2a. Plugging in a = 9, b = -22, and c = 2, we get:
x = (-(-22) ± sqrt((-22)² - 4(9)(2))) / 2(9)
x = (22 ± sqrt(352)) / 18
x = (22 ± 4sqrt22) / 18
Simplifying this expression, we get:
x = (11 ± 2sqrt22) / 9
Therefore, the solution to the equation is x = -2/3.
To solve the equation sqrt 2-3x / sqrt 4x = 2, we must clear the denominators and simplify the equation. This involves multiplying both sides by sqrt(4x) and then squaring both sides.

After simplifying, we end up with a quadratic equation. Using the quadratic formula, we can find that the solutions are x = (11 ± 2sqrt22) / 9.

However, we must check that these solutions do not result in a division by zero, as the original equation involves square roots. It turns out that the only valid solution is x = -2/3.

Therefore, this is the solution to the equation.

for such more questions on solution

https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ8

The correct answer is a. 4. Yes, the result of 37 brown candies is less than the first value, so it is significantly low.b. The probability of exactly 37 brown chocolate candies is 0.0306.c. The probability of 37 or fewer brown chocolate candies is 0.0611.

a. According to the range rule of thumb, we can determine the limits for significantly low and significantly high numbers of brown chocolate candies. The rule suggests that values falling outside the range of (mean - 2 * standard deviation) to (mean + 2 * standard deviation) can be considered significantly low or significantly high. In this case:

Let's assume that the sample consists of N chocolate candies.

Given:

Total number of chocolate candies in the bag = 355

Number of brown chocolate candies = 37

Percentage of brown chocolate candies claimed by the company = 13%

We can calculate the mean and standard deviation as follows:

Mean = N * 0.13

Standard Deviation = sqrt(N * 0.13 * 0.87)

Using the range rule of thumb, the limits separating significantly low and significantly high numbers of brown chocolate candies are:

Significantly low: Mean - 2 * Standard Deviation

Significantly high: Mean + 2 * Standard Deviation

b. To find the probability of exactly 37 brown chocolate candies, we can use the binomial probability formula:

P(X = x) = (nCk) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

In this case, n = N (total number of candies), k = 37 (number of brown candies), and p = 0.13 (probability of a candy being brown).

c. To find the probability of 37 or fewer brown chocolate candies, we need to calculate the cumulative probability from 0 to 37 using the binomial probability formula:

P(X ≤ x) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + ... + P(X = 37)

Let me perform the calculations for you.

Learn more about  probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/23417919

#SPJ8

The volume of the right prism is equal to 312 cubic units.

In this problem we find the representation of a right prism, whose volume  must be found by means of the following formula:

V = A · h

Where:

And the area of the base can be found by following formula:

Triangle

A = 0.5 · w · l

Rectangle

A = w · l

Where:

The volume of the solid is now computed:

V = (0.5 · 3 · 4 + 5 · 4) · 12

V = (6 + 20) · 12

V = 26 · 12

V = 312

To learn more on volumes of prisms: https://brainly.com/question/29121342

#SPJ1

Answer:

The system of linear inequalities represented by the graph is:

y > x - 2 and y < x + 1

This system of inequalities indicates that y is greater than x - 2, which represents the upper boundary of the shaded region in the graph. Additionally, y is less than x + 1, which represents the lower boundary of the shaded region. The intersection of these two conditions is the region between the lines, satisfying both inequalities.

Comparing the characteristics of the two functions, we can conclude that the graph of g(x) = -2² is a reflection of the graph of f(x) = 3x² over the x-axis (option C).

The given functions are f(x) = 3x² and g(x) = -2².

To understand the difference between their graphs, let's examine the characteristics of each function individually:

Function f(x) = 3x²:

The coefficient of x² is positive (3), indicating an upward-opening parabola.

The graph of f(x) will be symmetric with respect to the y-axis, as any change in x will result in the same y-value due to the squaring of x.

The vertex of the parabola will be at the origin (0, 0) since there are no additional terms affecting the position of the graph.

Function g(x) = -2²:

The coefficient of x² is negative (-2), indicating a downward-opening parabola.

The negative sign will reflect the graph of f(x) across the x-axis, resulting in a vertical flip.

The vertex of the parabola will also be at the origin (0, 0) due to the absence of additional terms.

Comparing the characteristics of the two functions, we can conclude that the graph of g(x) = -2² is a reflection of the graph of f(x) = 3x² over the x-axis (option C). This means that g(x) is obtained by taking the graph of f(x) and flipping it vertically. The reflection occurs over the x-axis, causing the parabola to open downward instead of upward.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C: g(x) is a reflection of f(x) over the x-axis.

For more such questions on functions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25638609

#SPJ8

Answer:

Hope this helps and have a nice day

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's denote the total number of boxes the hawker bought as "x".

The cost of each box is R18, so the total cost of buying "x" boxes is 18x.

He sold all but 5 boxes, so he sold (x - 5) boxes at R25 per box. The revenue from selling these boxes is 25 * (x - 5).

The profit is calculated by subtracting the cost from the revenue, so we have:

Profit = Revenue - Cost

155 = 25 * (x - 5) - 18x

Simplifying the equation:

155 = 25x - 125 - 18x

155 + 125 = 25x - 18x

280 = 7x

Dividing both sides by 7:

x = 280 / 7

x = 40

Therefore, the hawker bought 40 boxes of tomatoes.

The expression 3x² + 6x + 4x + 8 is factorized as (x + 2)(3x + 4).

To factorize the algebraic expression 3x² + 6x + 4x + 8, you can follow these three steps:

Step 1: Grouping

Group the terms in pairs based on their common factors:

(3x² + 6x) + (4x + 8)

Step 2: Factor out common factors

Factor out the greatest common factor from each group of terms:

3x(x + 2) + 4(x + 2)

Now, we have a common factor of (x + 2) in both terms.

Step 3: Combine the factored terms

Combine the factored terms using the common factor:

(x + 2)(3x + 4)

The expression 3x² + 6x + 4x + 8 is factorized as (x + 2)(3x + 4).

In this process, we grouped the terms with similar variables and then factored out the greatest common factor from each group. Finally, we combined the factored terms using the common factor to obtain the fully factorized expression.

It's important to note that factoring algebraic expressions requires practice and familiarity with common factoring techniques. In some cases, you may encounter expressions that require additional methods such as factoring by grouping, using special factoring formulas, or applying quadratic factoring techniques.

By following these three steps, you can factorize the given expression by identifying common factors and combining terms accordingly.

for more such question on factorized  visit

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ8

The discriminant value associated with this equation include the following: A. -5.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the standard form of a quadratic equation is represented by the following equation;

ax² + bx + c = 0

In this scenario, we would determine the number of zeros by using the discriminant formula as follows;

Discriminant, D = b² - 4ac

This ultimately implies that, the discriminant value must be a negative numerical value and two complex roots such as -5;

-5 = b² - 4ac

Read more on quadratic equation here: https://brainly.com/question/1562469

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

A quadratic equation has zero real number solutions. which could be the discriminant value associated with this equation?

a. –5 b. 0 c. 1 d. 6

The amount of money there would be in 18 years is $82078.65.

The value of the bond increased over the 18 years period.

In Mathematics and Financial accounting, compound interest can be calculated by using the following mathematical equation (formula):

[tex]A(t) = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Where:

By substituting the given parameters into the formula for compound interest, we have the following;

[tex]A(18) = 20000(1 + \frac{0.08}{2})^{2 \times 18}\\\\A(18) = 20000(1.04)^{36}[/tex]

Future value, A(18) = $82078.65

Read more on compound interest here: brainly.com/question/16608367

#SPJ1

Answer:

  $82078.65

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the value of a $20,000 investment that pays 8% interest compounded semiannually for 18 years.

The value of the investment of principal amount P at interest rate r compounded n times per year for t years is given by the formula ...

  A = P(1 +r/n)^(nt)

Using the given values, we find the amount of money in 18 years will be ...

  A = $20,000(1 + 0.08/2)^(2·18) = $20,000(1.04^36) ≈ $82,078.65

In 18 years there will be $82,078.65.

__

Additional comment

Some calculators and all spreadsheets have built-in functions for evaluating financial formulas.

<95141404393>

Answer: 98 This statement is true

Step-by-step explanation:

100-11=89

89-12=77

77+21=98

The conditional probability for this problem is given as follows:

C. P(A|B) = 2/5 = 0.4 = 40%.

The parameters that are needed to calculate a probability are listed as follows:

Then the probability is calculated as the division of the number of desired outcomes by the number of total outcomes.

For this problem, we have that 5 students play soccer, and of those, 2 play basketball, hence the conditional probability is given as follows:

C. P(A|B) = 2/5 = 0.4 = 40%.

Learn more about the concept of probability at https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

Answer:The present worth of the project for Bronson Building Inc is $6,389,137.

In order to calculate the present worth, follow these steps:

1. The given information is:

Initial cost (first cost) = $18,000,000

Annual revenue = $5,000,000

Annual expenses = $2,000,000

Net annual cash flow = Annual revenue - Annual expenses = $5,000,000 - $2,000,000 = $3,000,000

MARR = 11%

Project duration = 18 years

Sale price at the end of the project = $8,000,000

2. To calculate the present worth, we first need to find the present value of the net annual cash flows using the MARR as the discount rate. Then, we will add the present value of the sale price and subtract the initial cost.

Present value of net annual cash flows (PV_ACF) = Net annual cash flow * [(1 - (1 + MARR)^(-duration)) / MARR]

PV_ACF = $3,000,000 * [(1 - (1 + 0.11)^(-18)) / 0.11] = $3,000,000 * 7.696 = $23,088,000

3. Find the present value of the sale price at the end of the project.

Present value of sale price (PV_SP) = Sale price / (1 + MARR)^duration

PV_SP = $8,000,000 / (1 + 0.11)^18 = $8,000,000 / 6.146 = $1,301,137

4. Calculate the present worth of the project.

Present worth = PV_ACF + PV_SP - Initial cost

Present worth = $23,088,000 + $1,301,137 - $18,000,000 = $6,389,137

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x ≈ 77.79 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

using the sine ratio in the right triangle

sin40° = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{50}{x}[/tex] ( multiply both sides by x )

x × sin40° = 50 ( divide both sides by sin40° )

x = [tex]\frac{50}{sin40}[/tex] ≈ 77.79 ft ( to the nearest hundredth )

Answer: Logarithmic function

Step-by-step explanation:  y=logax and it's a reflection of an exponential curve that curves up and a logarithmic function curves down.

To find an ordered pair that satisfies the given system of inequalities, we need to find a point that lies below the line y = -x - 3 and above the line y = 2x - 4.

One such point that satisfies both inequalities is (-1, 0).

Let's check if this point satisfies both inequalities:

For the first inequality, y < -x - 3:

0 < -(-1) - 3

0 < 1 - 3

0 < -2 (True)

For the second inequality, y > 2x - 4:

0 > 2(-1) - 4

0 > -2 - 4

0 > -6 (True)

Therefore, the ordered pair (-1, 0) satisfies the system of inequalities y < -x - 3 and y > 2x - 4.

Group A is performing most consistently in terms of quality and associate engagement compared to last month.

To determine which performance area the groups are performing most consistently compared to last month, we need to compare the scores of each performance area between the two months.

Let's analyze each performance area:

Quality:

For Group A, the quality score increased from 90 to 94, indicating an improvement in quality performance. However, for Group B, the quality score decreased from 74 to 70, indicating a decline in quality performance. Therefore, Group A is performing more consistently in terms of quality compared to last month.

Productivity:

For Group A, the productivity score decreased from 79 to 62, showing a significant decline in productivity performance. Similarly, for Group B, the productivity score decreased from 86 to 58, indicating a notable decline as well. Both groups experienced a decrease in productivity performance, but Group A had a larger decline. Therefore, neither group is performing consistently in terms of productivity compared to last month.

Associate Engagement:

For Group A, the engagement score increased from 68 to 70, suggesting a slight improvement in associate engagement. Conversely, for Group B, the engagement score increased from 76 to 72, indicating a slight decline. Both groups had minor changes in engagement scores, but Group A had a smaller change. Therefore, Group A is performing more consistently in terms of associate engagement compared to last month.

Based on the analysis, Group A is performing most consistently in terms of quality and associate engagement compared to last month. However, neither group is performing consistently in terms of productivity. It is important to address the productivity decline and identify areas for improvement to ensure consistent performance across all categories.

for more such question on consistently visit

https://brainly.com/question/15654281

#SPJ8

Answer:

the measure of < RST is 21.70 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

If < HIK and < RST are complementary angles, it means that the sum of their measures is 90 degrees.

Let's denote the measure of < RST as x.

Given that the measure of < HIK is 68.30 degrees, we can set up the following equation:

68.30 + x = 90

To solve for x, we subtract 68.30 from both sides:

x = 90 - 68.30

Calculating the value:

x = 21.70

Withdrawal: If Henry decides to withdraw money from his bank account, the opposite quantity would be the amount he withdraws.

Transfer: If Henry transfers money from his account to another account, the opposite quantity would be the amount of the transfer.

Debit/Credit: If there are debit or credit transactions on Henry's account, the opposite quantity would depend on whether it is a debit (negative) or credit (positive) entry.

To determine the opposite quantity that makes Henry's balance, we need to know the specific transaction or action that affects the balance. Without further information, it is not possible to provide an exact answer.

However, I can explain a few scenarios based on common banking transactions that could result in an opposite quantity affecting Henry's balance:

1. Withdrawal: If Henry decides to withdraw money from his bank account, the opposite quantity would be the amount he withdraws. For example, if Henry withdraws $50 from his account, the opposite quantity would be -$50.

2. Transfer: If Henry transfers money from his account to another account, the opposite quantity would be the amount of the transfer. For instance, if Henry transfers $100 to another account, the opposite quantity would be -$100.

3. Debit/Credit: If there are debit or credit transactions on Henry's account, the opposite quantity would depend on whether it is a debit (negative) or credit (positive) entry.

It's important to note that these scenarios are examples, and the opposite quantity would vary depending on the specific transaction or action affecting Henry's balance. To accurately determine the opposite quantity, we would need more information about the specific transaction or action taken by Henry that impacts his account balance.

for more such question on money visit

https://brainly.com/question/24373500

#SPJ8

Answer:

10.4°

Step-by-step explanation:

the angle of elevation is the angle from the horizontal , upward from one point on the horizontal to another point, not on the horizontal

in this case the angle of elevation is represented by ∠ A

using the sine ratio in the right triangle

sin A = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{36}{200}[/tex] , then

∠ A = [tex]sin^{-1}[/tex] ( [tex]\frac{36}{200}[/tex] ) ≈ 10.4° ( to the nearest tenth )

the angle of elevation to the kite is approximately 10.4°

We can complete the blanks with the following ratios:

(7.5 mi/1) * (1 mi/ 5280 ft) * (400ft/1 yd) * (3 ft/1 ft) =33 flags

Since we do not need a flag at the starting line, then 32 flags will be required in total.

To solve the problem, we would first convert 400 yds to feet and miles.

To convert to feet, we multiply by 3. This gives us: 400 yd * 3 = 1200 feet.

To convert to miles, we would have 0.227 miles.

Now, we divide the entire race distance by the number of miles divisions.

This gives us:

7.5 mi /0.227 mi

= 33 flags

Learn more about miles-to-yards conversion here:

https://brainly.com/question/1609225

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine if the point (4,1) is a solution for the system of equations, we need to substitute the values of x and y from the point into both equations and check if the equations hold true.

For the first equation, y = -x + 5, we substitute x = 4 and y = 1:

1 = -(4) + 5

1 = -4 + 5

1 = 1

The equation holds true for the first equation.

For the second equation, y = 2x - 7, we substitute x = 4 and y = 1:

1 = 2(4) - 7

1 = 8 - 7

1 = 1

The equation also holds true for the second equation.

Since the point (4,1) satisfies both equations, it is indeed a solution to the system of equations.

The computed mean of 52.4 and the actual mean of 52.7 suggest a close relationship in terms of central tendency.

A computed mean is a statistical measure calculated by summing up a set of values and dividing by the number of observations. In this case, the computed mean of 52.4 implies that when the values are averaged, the result is 52.4.

The actual mean of 52.7 refers to the true average of the population or data set being analyzed. Since it is higher than the computed mean, it indicates that the sample used for computation might have slightly underestimated the true population mean.

However, the difference between the computed mean and the actual mean is relatively small, with only a 0.3 unit discrepancy.

Given the proximity of these two values, it suggests that the computed mean is a reasonably accurate estimate of the actual mean.

However, it's important to note that without additional information, such as the sample size or the variability of the data, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the relationship between the computed mean and the actual mean.

For more such questions on mean

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ8

(a) To find the assets in 2011 using the given information: A. To find the assets in 2011, substitute 11 for x and evaluate to find A(x).

In 2011 the assets are about $669.6 billion

(b) To find the assets in 2016 using the given information: B. To find the assets in 2016, substitute 16 for x and evaluate to find A(x).

In 2016 the assets are about $931.5 billion.

(c) To find the assets in 2019 using the given information: B. To find the assets in 2019, substitute 19 for x and evaluate to find A(x).

In 2019 the assets are about $1135.4 billion.

Based on the information provided, we can logically deduce that the assets for a financial firm can be approximately represented by the following exponential function:

[tex]A(x)=324e^{0.066x}[/tex]

where:

For the year 2011, the cost (in billions of dollars) is given by;

x = (2011 - 2007) + 7

x = 4 + 7

x = 11 years.

Next, we would substitute 11 for x in the exponential function:

[tex]A(11)=324e^{0.066 \times 11}[/tex]

A(11) = $669.6 billions.

Part b.

For the year 2016, the cost (in billions of dollars) is given by;

x = (2016 - 2007) + 7

x = 9 + 7

x = 16 years.

Next, we would substitute 16 for x in the exponential function:

[tex]A(16)=324e^{0.066 \times 16}[/tex]

A(16) = $931.5 billions.

Part c.

For the year 2019, the cost (in billions of dollars) is given by;

x = (2019 - 2007) + 7

x = 12 + 7

x = 19 years.

Next, we would substitute 19 for x in the exponential function:

[tex]A(19)=324e^{0.066 \times 19}[/tex]

A(19) = $1135.4 billions.

Read more on functions here: https://brainly.com/question/27931201

#SPJ1

Answer:

-4 is the coefficient or -4x whatever the answers are

Step-by-step explanation:

the coefficient in mathematics is basically whatever the number is infront of a variable in an expression, equation, etc.

Answer:

[tex] \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Answer:

the probability that at least one of the cards drawn is a diamond is 5/32

Step-by-step explanation:

In a standard 52-card  deck, there are 13 diamond cards,

Now,

The probability of a card being a diamond is ,

P = 13/52

P = 1/4

Now, we have to find the probability that atleast one of the 4 cards is a diamond, we calculate the probabilities,

There is 1 diamond in the 4 cards,

Hence the other 3 are not diamonds i.e the porbability for not being a diamond is,

N = 1-1/4 = 3/4

So,

The total probability is,

T1 = (3/4)(3/4)(3/4)(1/4)

T1 = 27/256

There are 2 diamonds in the 4 cards,

And the other 2 are not diamonds, we get,

T2 = (1/4)(1/4)(3/4)(3/4)

T2=9/256

There are 3 diamonds in the 4 cards,

and 1 is not,

T3 = (1/4)(1/4)(1/4)(3/4)

T3 = 3/256

ALL FOUR are diamonds,

T4 = (1/4)(1/4)(1/4)(1/4)

T4 = 1/256

Hence, the probability that at least 1 is a diamond is,

T = T1 + T2 + T3 + T4

T = (27/256) + (9/256) + (3/256) + (1/256)

T = 40/256

T = 5/32

The range for the graph provided is from -10 to 10, inclusive.

To determine the range of the graph, we look at the vertical values or the y-values. The lowest y-value on the graph is -10, which corresponds to the point (-6, -10). The highest y-value on the graph is 10, which corresponds to the point (6, 10).

Therefore, the range of the graph is from -10 to 10, which means that all the y-values on the graph fall within this range. This indicates that the graph spans a vertical distance of 20 units, starting from -10 and ending at 10.

It's important to note that the range includes the minimum and maximum values attained by the graph. In this case, the graph reaches its lowest point at -10 and its highest point at 10.

for such more question on range

https://brainly.com/question/16444481

#SPJ8

Answer:

23 Heads or Legs

Answer:

Perimeter = 40 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is given by:

P = 2l + 2w, where,

Thus, we can allow the 11-inch side to represent the length and the 9-inch side to represent the width and plug in 11 for l and 9 for w in the perimeter formula to find P, the perimeter of the rectangle:

P = 2(11) + 2(9)

P = 22 + 18

P = 40

Thus, the perimeter of the rectangle is 40 inches.