(-6,-4), (0, -4), and (2,-4)

What is the equation of this line?

If you look at the six numbers (101, 203, 407, 512, 98, 642) you can see they range from 98 all the way to 642. the best interval to use for this group be 100.

The right interval to utilize for this set of numbers depends on the aim of the analysis.

If we want to look on the single values and small differences between them, then using interval of 10 would be more better. This would give u room to see small changes that exist between adjacent numbers.

So,  in the event that we need to look on the full range and distribution of the numbers, an interval of 100 would be more better. This would permit us to see how the numbers are shared over a larger area of values.

Learn more about range from

https://brainly.com/question/26098895

#SPJ1

See full question below

If you look at these six numbers, you can see they range from 98 all the way to 642. Would the best interval to use for this group be 10 or 100?

101, 203, 407, 512, 98, 642

Answer: [tex]\frac{-3}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

   To find the slope of the line, we will use change in y over change in x.

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{y_{2} -y_{1} }{x_{2} -x_{1} } =\frac{-4--1}{3--1} =\frac{-4+1}{3+1} =\frac{-3}{4}[/tex]

Assertion: Yes, √2 is an irrational number.

Reason: The decimal expansion of √2 is 1.41421356237 which is a non-recurring and non-terminating number.

Both (A) and (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

Assertion: Yes, √2 is an irrational number.

Reason: The decimal expansion of √2 is 1.41421356237 which is a non-recurring and non-terminating number.

All real numbers that are not rational numbers are referred to as irrational numbers in mathematics. In other words, it is impossible to describe an irrational number as the ratio of two integers.

Read more about irrational numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/20400557

#SPJ1

The Complete Question

Assertion (A): V2 is an irrational number. Reason (R) : Decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-recurring and non terminating???? a) Both (A) and (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A) b) Both (A) and ( R) are true but Reason (R) is not a correct explanation of (A) c) Assertion (A) is true and Reason (R) is false d) Assertion (A) is false and Reason (R) is true​

Answer:

True proportion of homeowners in the population lies between 0.333 and 0.847

Step-by-step explanation:

If 9 out of 22 randomly picked people said they rented their homes, then the remaining 13 must own their homes. Therefore, the point estimate of the proportion of homeowners is:

Point estimate = Number of homeowners / Total number of people surveyed

Point estimate = 13 / 22

Point estimate = 0.59 (rounded to two decimal places)

To calculate the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of homeowners, we can use the following formula:

Confidence interval = Point estimate ± (Z-value x Standard error)

where the Z-value corresponds to the desired level of confidence and the standard error is given by:

Standard error = sqrt [ (Point estimate x (1 - Point estimate)) / Sample size]

For a 95% confidence interval, the Z-value is 1.96 (from the standard normal distribution). Using the point estimate obtained earlier, the sample size is 22, and we can calculate the standard error as:

Standard error = sqrt [ (0.59 x 0.41) / 22 ]

Standard error = 0.131 (rounded to three decimal places)

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

Confidence interval = 0.59 ± (1.96 x 0.131)

Confidence interval = 0.59 ± 0.257

Confidence interval = (0.333, 0.847)

Therefore, with 95% confidence, we can say that the true proportion of homeowners in the population lies between 0.333 and 0.847.

The correct interpretation of the p-value is 3.34.

We are given that;

t-value=3.34

Number of customers= 200

Now,

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed one, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. In this case, the p-value of 0.001 means that there is a 0.1% chance of getting a t-value of 3.34 or higher (or -3.34 or lower) if the true slope of the linear relationship between the two ratings is zero. The p-value is very small, which indicates that the data provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis and in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

The p-value of 0.001 means that there is a 0.1% chance of getting a t-value of 3.34 or higher (or -3.34 or lower) if there is no linear relationship between the two ratings.

Therefore, by probability the answer will be 3.34

Learn more about probability here;

https://brainly.com/question/9326835

#SPJ1

The logarithm expression can be simplified to:

In(6x^9)-In(x^2) =7·ln(6x)

There are some logarithm properties we can use here.

log(a) - log(b) = log(a/b)

log(a^n) = n*log(a)

(these obviously also apply to the natural logarithm)

Now let's look at our expression, it says that:

In(6x^9)-In(x^2)

Using the first rule, we can rewrite this as.

In(6x^9)-In(x^2) = ln(6x^9/x^2)

Now solving the quotient in the argument:

ln(6x^9/x^2) = ln(6x^7) = 7·ln(6x)

That is the expresison simplified.

Learn more about logarithms at:

https://brainly.com/question/13473114

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex] {z}^{2} - 10z + 9 = [/tex]

[tex](z - 1)(z - 9)[/tex]

If principal of $3900 is invested at 4.25% interest, compounded annually, the investment will be worth approximately $4,756.89 after 5 years.

To calculate the future value of the investment, we use the formula for compound interest:

A = [tex]P(1 + r/n)^{(n*t)[/tex]

where A is the future value, P is the principal, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, P = $3900, r = 4.25%, n = 1 (compounded annually), and t = 5. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

A = 3900(1 + 0.0425/1)⁵

A = 3900(1.0425)⁵

A ≈ $4,756.89

To learn more about investment click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31784776

#SPJ1

Answer:

mt1= 995

mt2=975

Step-by-step explanation:

the line inside the box plot shows where the median is.

The distance between point (−7, 8) and point (5, 8) is 12 units (since they are on the same horizontal line). The distance between point (−7, 8) and point (−7, −5) is 13 units (using the Pythagorean theorem). Therefore, the point that is farther away is option D: Point (−7, −5), and it is 13 units away.

An equation which Samantha can use to find the side length of the base in terms of the volume and height of her puzzle is: A. a = √(3V/h)

In Mathematics and Geometry, the volume of a square pyramid can be calculated by using the following formula:

Volume of a square pyramid, V = 1/3 × a² × h

Where:

By making "a" the subject of formula, the side length of the base of a square pyramid can be determined as follows;

V = 1/3 × a² × h

3V = a²h

a² = 3V/h

By taking the square root of both sides of the equation, we have:

a = √(3V/h)

Read more on pyramid here: brainly.com/question/16315790

#SPJ1

From the given data, we have:

| x   | 2   | 3   | 4   | 5   | 6   |

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

| p(x) |    |    |    |    |    |

We need to find the value of p(x > 3).

We know that the sum of all the probabilities is equal to 1. So, we can find the missing probability by subtracting the sum of the probabilities we know from 1.

p(x = 2) + p(x = 3) + p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6) = 1

We don't know the value of p(x = 2), so we can't directly calculate p(x > 3). But we can find p(x ≤ 3) and subtract it from 1 to get p(x > 3).

p(x ≤ 3) = p(x = 2) + p(x = 3)

To find p(x = 2), we can use the fact that the sum of all the probabilities is 1:

p(x = 2) = 1 - (p(x = 3) + p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6))

Now we can substitute this into the equation for p(x ≤ 3) and solve:

p(x ≤ 3) = p(x = 2) + p(x = 3)

p(x ≤ 3) = 1 - (p(x = 3) + p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6)) + p(x = 3)

p(x ≤ 3) = 1 - (p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6))

Finally, we can subtract p(x ≤ 3) from 1 to get p(x > 3):

p(x > 3) = 1 - p(x ≤ 3)

p(x > 3) = 1 - (1 - (p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6)))

p(x > 3) = p(x = 4) + p(x = 5) + p(x = 6)

Therefore, the value of p(x > 3) is the sum of the probabilities for x = 4, 5, and 6.

Answer:

1 out of 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Each roll of the die is an independent event. This means that the second roll does not rely on the first roll. The probability of rolling a six is one out of six. The probability of rolling a two is also one out of six. Since the two events are independent of each other, you would take the average of the two probabilities, which since they are both one out of six, the probability of rolling a six and then a two is one out of six.

(a) The value of the row operation of -2(row1) + row (2) is [-10     4    -12].

(b) The interchange of row 1 and row 2 is  [0     6    -3]

                                                                       [5    -2     6]

The value of the row operation of -2(row1) + row (2) is calculated as follows;

-2 (row 1) = 2 [5   -2    6]

-2 (row 1) = [-10     4    -12]

The addition of -2(row1) to row (2) is calculated as follows;

[-10     4    -12] + [0    6    -3]

= [-10   10  - 15]

The interchange of row 1 and row 2 is calculated as follows;

R₁ ↔ R₂

= [5    -2     6]    =   [0     6    -3]

  [0     6    -3]         [5    -2     6]

Learn more about row operations here: https://brainly.com/question/17490035

#SPJ1

Answer:

Subtract the powers, 8-4.

When you simplify that equation itself, the answer is 10,000.

So when you do 10⁴, it's 10,000.

Answer:

10000

otra solución es: 10⁴

Answer:

$74.66

Step-by-step explanation:

Plot the points on the graphing calculator (x = length of HDMI cord, y = cost). Then generate a linear regression model:

y = 3.68x + 1.06 (approximately)

x = 20, so y = 74.66

$74.66 is the correct answer.

The total amount that the Bells will pay for their house would be $313, 680.

The cost that would be interest is $193, 680

The amount of the first payment going to mortgages is $165. 24

Find the down payment :

Down payment = House price - Mortgage amount = $120,000 - $90,000 = $30,000

Then the points paid at closing :

= $ 90,000 x 0. 02 = $1,800

Total amount paid = Total mortgage payments + Down payment + Points cost

= 281, 880 + 30, 000 + 1, 800

= $ 313, 680

The total that is interest is:

Total interest paid = Total interest paid through monthly payments + Points cost

Total interest paid = $ 191, 880 + $ 1, 800 = $193, 680

The amount of the first payment going to principal is:

Principal portion of first payment = 90, 000 - 89, 834.76 = $165. 24

Find out more on principal at https://brainly.com/question/30163719

#SPJ1

Where is the given proof

The quadratic equation is solved and the solution is x = 1 and x = 4

Given data ,

Let's expand the left-hand side of the equation:

(2x+1)² + (4x-4)²

= (2x)² + 2(2x)(1) + 1² + (4x)² - 2(4x)(4) + 4² (using the formula for the square of a binomial)

= 4x² + 4x + 1 + 16x² - 32x + 16

= 20x² - 28x + 17

Now let's expand the right-hand side of the equation:

(4x-1)²

= (4x)² - 2(4x)(1) + 1²

= 16x² - 8x + 1

Now we can set the left-hand side equal to the right-hand side and simplify:

20x² - 28x + 17 = 16x² - 8x + 1

4x² - 20x + 16 = 0

x² - 5x + 4 = 0

(x - 1)(x - 4) = 0

Hence , the solution is x = 1 and x = 4

To learn more about quadratic equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/25652857

#SPJ1

C: the number of leaves is multiplied by 2 each week

Step-by-step explanation

The proper expression ought to be 5(2) ^ t =5(2)^{t}

where t speak to the number weeks after it planted.

On the off chance that we put to the time(t) we are going know how numerous clears out at first are. The calculation will be:

5(2)^{t}= 5(2)^{0} =5

This appear that coefficient 5 decide how much the takes off at first are.

Let see how the number going for distinctive esteem of t. On the off chance that its 1 week after plant, the leaf will ended up:

5(2)^{t}= 5(2)^{1} = 10

At that point the number of takes off 2 weeks after planted will be:

5(2)^{t}= 5(2)^{2}= 20

The number keeps twofold each week since coefficient 2 speaks to the proportion of the development of the work and the proportion decides how much takes off duplicated each week.

So, the reply will be C.

The Ferris Wheel can carry 2100 passengers on a total of 35 rides.

According to the question,

Number of cars in the Ferry Wheel = 15

Number of passengers in each car = 4

∴ Number of passengers in 15 cars = 15×4 = 60

So, the number of passengers on the Ferry Wheel = 60

Now,

The number of passengers the Ferry Wheel carries in one ride = 60

∴ The number of passengers in 35 rides = 60×35 = 2100.

Hence the Ferris Wheel can carry 2100 passengers on a total of 35 rides.

For more word problems on multiplication,

https://brainly.com/question/2076545

https://brainly.com/question/29079711

Mr. Mensah will pay 247.5 each month to the social security fund because 5.5% of 4500 is 247.5.

The total monthly salary of Mr. Mensah is 4500.

He is required to pay 5.5% of his salary into a social security fund.

Now, we have to find the amount he has to pay each month into the social security fund.

To find that, we need to find the value of 5.5 percent of 4500.

4500 ×5.5/100

45×5.5

247.5

Therefore, 5.5% of 4500 is 247.5.

To know more about Percentages, click on: https://brainly.com/question/31323953.

log base 16, 32 can be written as log₂⁴ 2₅.

Evaluate with logₐx, write a and x as powers of same.

a) log₁₆ 64

= log₂⁴=2⁶

b) log₈₁ 27

= log₃⁴ 3³

c) log₁₆ 32

= log₂⁴ 2₅

d) log₂₇ 243

= log₃³ 3₅

Therefore, log base 16, 32 can be written as log₂⁴ 2₅.

To learn more about the logarithmic equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14406101.

#SPJ1

The number of times more high school football players were there is 500.

Given that, in 2015, there were roughly 1×10⁶ high school football players and 2×10³ professional football players in the United States.

Here, the number of times more high school football players were there

= 1×10⁶/2×10³

= 1×10³/2

= 1000/2

= 500

Therefore, the number of times more high school football players were there is 500.

To learn more about the unitary method visit:

brainly.com/question/22056199.

#SPJ2

"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"

In 2015, there were roughly 1×10⁶ high school football players and 2×10³ professional football players in the United States. About how many times more high school football players were there?​

Daniel incorrectly applied the square root to both terms on the left side of the equation and he forgot to take into account the possibility of multiple roots when solving for the cube root of z³.

Let's first look at the first equation that Daniel solved incorrectly:

25x²-16=9

Daniel's solution:

√(25x² )-√16=√9

5x-4=±3

5x=±7

x=±7/5

What Daniel did wrong here is that he incorrectly applied the square root to both terms on the left side of the equation.

Instead, he should have simplified the left side first, using the fact that √(a²) = |a|, before applying the square root. So the correct solution is:

25x²-16=9

25x²=25

x²=1

x=±1

Now let's look at the second equation that Daniel solved incorrectly:

z³-2=6

Daniel's solution:

z³=8

∛(z^3 )=∛8

z=±2

What Daniel did wrong here is that he forgot to take into account the possibility of multiple roots when solving for the cube root of z³.

In fact, z³ = 8 has three roots: z = 2, z = -1 + i√3, and z = -1 - i√3. So the correct solution is:

z³-2=6

z³=8

z=2

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

It mentions that they charge 1.20 per kg of lettuce

An exponential function would be more appropriate than a linear function, as exponential growth

To determine which type of function best fits the data, we can analyze the difference in the y values (Value of Investment) as x increases.

Differences between consecutive y values:

16,357.04 - 14,944.54 = 1,412.50

17,974.72 - 16,357.04 = 1,617.68

19,891.18 - 17,974.72 = 1,916.46

The differences between consecutive y values are increasing as x increases. This suggests that an exponential function would be more appropriate than a linear function.

Read more on exponential function here https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The area of the sector is 2π/1

The formula for calculating the area of a sector is expressed as;

A = θ/360 πr²

Given that the parameters are;

From the information given, we have that;

The angle = 45 degrees

radius, r = 4

Substitute the values, we have;

Area = 45/360 × π × 4²

Divide the values

Area = 3/ 24 × π × 16

Multiply the values, we have;

Area = 48π/24

Divide the values, we have;

Area = 2π/1

Learn more about area at: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1