a bus driver pays all tolls using only nickels and dimes by throwing one coin at a time into the mechanical toll collector.in how many different ways can a driver pay a toll of 45 cents?

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p.

We observed 4 infected plants. To determine the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data, we need to calculate the probabilities of 4 and 5 infected plants for a range of values of p and add them up.

The probability of 4 infected plants is:

P(X = 4) = 5C4 * p^4 * (1-p)^1 = 5p^4 * (1-p)

The probability of 5 infected plants is:

P(X = 5) = 5C5 * p^5 * (1-p)^0 = p^5

Therefore, the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is:

P(X >= 4) = P(X = 4) + P(X = 5) = 5p^4 * (1-p) + p^5

(ii) To determine if p = 0.3 or p = 0.2 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is less than or equal to 0.025. We can solve this numerically using the expression derived in part (i):

For p = 0.3:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.3)^4 * (1-0.3) + (0.3)^5 = 0.0765

Since 0.0765 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

For p = 0.2:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.2)^4 * (1-0.2) + (0.2)^5 = 0.01024

Since 0.01024 < 0.025, we can conclude that p = 0.2 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

(iii) If we observed five infected plants out of five, then the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is simply P(X = 5) = p^5. To determine if p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of observing five infected plants is less than or equal to 0.025:

p^5 <= 0.025

p <= (0.025)^(1/5)

p <= 0.551

Since 0.3 < 0.551, we can conclude that p = 0.3 does not lie within the 95% confidence interval.

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p. We observed one infected plant. To determine if p = 0.6 or p = 0.7 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data (i.e., zero or one infected plants) is less than or equal to 0.025:

For p = 0.6:

P(X <= 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = (0.4)^5 + 5(0.6)(0.4)^4 = 0.07808

Since 0.07808 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.6

Visit here to learn more about binomial distribution brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ11

Answer:

1.25 (in decimal form)

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The two plans will cost the same for 250 minutes of call

b) The cost when the two plans cost the same is $40.50

From the question, we are to determine when the two plans will cost the same

From the given information,

Plan A costs $23 plus an additional $0.07 for each minute of calls.

Plan B costs $18 plus an additional $0.09 for each minute of calls.

Let x represent minute of calls.

Then,

We can write that

Plan A:

Cost = $23 + $0.07x

Plan B:

Cost = $18 + $0.09x

To determine the amount of calling when the two plans will cost the same, we will equate the equations and then determine the value of x

23 + 0.07x = 18 + 0.09x

23 - 18 = 0.09x - 0.07x

5 = 0.02x

Divide both sides by 0.02

5/0.02 = x

250 = x

Therefore,

x = 250 minutes

The two plans will cost the same for 250 minutes of call

b)

To determine the cost when the two plans cost the same, we will substitute the value of x into any of the equations

Substitute x = 250 into Cost = $23 + $0.07x

Cost = $23 + $0.07(250)

Cost = $23 + $17.50

Cost = $40.50

Hence,

The cost is $40.50

Learn more on Calculating cost here:

https://brainly.com/question/18115044

https://brainly.com/question/29371980

#SPJ1

For having to pay the same amount for both memberships and walk-in classes, if memberships cost $51 per month for unlimited classes and walk-ins charge $3 per class, one has to attend classes and pay $51 as the total amount.

Let the number of classes that are attended be x

If the same amount is paid for unlimited membership classes and walk=in classes, then we get the following equation:

Membership cost = cost of walk-in classes = $51

Cost of walk-in classes = 3x

Thus, we get the following equation.

51 = 3x

x = 17

Thus, the number of classes attended is 17 and the final amount paid is $51.

Learn more about equations:

https://brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ4

Answer:

Which statement BEST defines a circle? A) A circle is the set of all points in a plane equidistant from each other. B) A circle is the set of all points in a plane equidistant from a given arc. C) A circle is the set of all points in a plane equidistant from a given point. D) A circle is the set of all points in a plane equidistant from a given segment.

Step-by-step explanation:

pls mark brainliest, i tried my best...

Answer: Distance = 10.83

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance = √((3-(-3))^2 + (4-(-5))^2)

Distance = √(6^2 + 9^2)

Distance = √117

Distance = 10.83

The requried arc length of DF is given as 66°.

A circle with tangent and secant pair is shown, we have to determine the arc  DF.

The angle between the tangent and secant of the circle is given as:

∠E= DG - DF/2

Substitute the value in the above expression,
24 = 114 - x/2
48 = 114 - x
x = 114 - 48
x = 66°

Thus, the requried arc length of DF is given as 66°.

Learn more about tangent and secant here:

https://brainly.com/question/15178974

#SPJ1

The null hypothesis is that the true average age of the sporting goods store's customers is equal to or less than 39. The alternative hypothesis is that the true average age is greater than 39.

To test this hypothesis, we can use a one-sample t-test. The t-statistic for this sample is (41.3-39)/(7/sqrt(43)) = 3.06. With 42 degrees of freedom (43-1), the critical value for a one-tailed test with alpha=0.10 is 1.684. Since 3.06 > 1.684, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the true average age of the store's customers is greater than 39.

Know more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The original sale price $95 sale 20% off the sale price is $76.

We are given that;

Amount= $95

Percentage= 20%

Now,

To find the sale price, we need to subtract the discount amount from the original price.

The discount amount is 20% of the original price, which means we multiply 0.2 by 95.

The discount amount is 0.2 x 95 = 19.

The sale price is 95 - 19 = 76.

Therefore, by the percentage the answer will be $76.

Learn more about percent here:

https://brainly.com/question/11549320

#SPJ1

If line passes through points (0,3) and (-3,0), then the slope calculated by Martin as "3" is incorrect because the correct slope is 1.

The "Slope" of a line is defined as measure of its steepness or inclination, and it describes how much the line rises or falls over a given distance in the horizontal direction.

To find the slope of a line passing through two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂), we use the slope formula ⇒ slope = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁),

In this case, the two points are (0, 3) and (-3, 0). Substituting the coordinates in formula, we get:

⇒ slope = (0 - 3)/(-3 - 0),

⇒ Slope = -3/-3,

⇒ Slope = 1,

Therefore, the correct slope of the line passing through the points (0, 3) and (-3, 0) is 1, not 3 as Martin incorrectly said.

Learn more about Slope here

https://brainly.com/question/21294876

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

The line in the graph passes through the points (0,3) and (-3,0), Martin incorrectly said that the slope of this line is "3" . What is the correct slope?

For a sum of $20709, prize is of either $100 or $25, there will be 15 prizes of $100 and 48 prizes of $25.

Let's assume that x prizes are given for $100 and y prizes are given for $25. Then, we can set up a system of two equations based on the given information,

x + y = 63 (the total number of prizes is 63)

100x + 25y = 2709 (the total value of the prizes is $2709)

We can solve this system of equations by substitution or elimination. Here, we will use the elimination method, multiplying the first equation by 25, we get,

25x + 25y = 1575

75x = 1134

Dividing both sides by 75, we get,

x = 15.12

Since we cannot have a fractional number of prizes, we can round this down to 15 (because it is closer to 15 than to 16).

Substituting x = 15 in the first equation, we get,

15 + y = 63

Solving for y, we get,

y = 48

Therefore, 15 prizes are given for $100 and 48 prizes are given for $25.

To know more about elimination method, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/25427192

#SPJ4

Based on the nutritional facts provided, there are 4.8 grams of unsaturated fat in 240 g of these crisps.

Based on the nutritional facts provided, 2/35 of fat are unsaturated fats.

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% of fats is calculated below:

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% fats = 2/35 * 35/100

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% fats = 2.00%

The mass in grams of unsaturated fat in 240 g of crisps, is calculated below as follows:

mass in grams of unsaturated fat = 2% * 240 g

mass in grams of unsaturated fat = 4.8 g

Learn more about percentages at: https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

The probability that a soccer player who tests positive takes steroids is approximately 0.279 or 27.9%.

To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem:

P(Steroids|Positive) = P(Positive|Steroids) * P(Steroids) / P(Positive)

where:
P(Steroids|Positive) = probability of taking steroids given a positive test result
P(Positive|Steroids) = probability of testing positive given that the player takes steroids (93%)
P(Steroids) = probability of a soccer player taking steroids (5%)
P(Positive) = overall probability of testing positive (calculated below)

To calculate P(Positive), we need to use the law of total probability:

P(Positive) = P(Positive|Steroids) * P(Steroids) + P(Positive|No Steroids) * P(No Steroids)

where:
P(Positive|No Steroids) = probability of testing positive given that the player does not take steroids (12%)
P(No Steroids) = probability of a soccer player not taking steroids (100% - 5% = 95%)

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(Positive) = 0.93 * 0.05 + 0.12 * 0.95 = 0.1165

Now we can calculate P(Steroids|Positive):

P(Steroids|Positive) = 0.93 * 0.05 / 0.1165 = 0.398

Therefore, the probability that a soccer player who tests positive takes steroids is 0.398 (rounded to three decimal places).

To find the probability that a soccer player who tests positive takes steroids, we can use Bayes' Theorem:

P(A|B) = (P(B|A) * P(A)) / P(B)

Here, let A be the event "player takes steroids" and B be the event "player tests positive."

We are given:
- P(B|A) = 0.93 (93% of players taking steroids test positive)
- P(A) = 0.05 (5% of soccer players take steroids)
- P(B|A') = 0.12 (12% of players not taking steroids test positive)

To find P(B), we can use the Law of Total Probability:

P(B) = P(B|A) * P(A) + P(B|A') * P(A')

Since P(A') = 1 - P(A) = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95, we have:

P(B) = (0.93 * 0.05) + (0.12 * 0.95)

Now, we can use Bayes' Theorem to find P(A|B):

P(A|B) = (0.93 * 0.05) / ((0.93 * 0.05) + (0.12 * 0.95))
P(A|B) ≈ 0.279

Therefore, the probability that a soccer player who tests positive takes steroids is approximately 0.279 or 27.9%.

To learn more about probability, click here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (d) 64%. The coefficient of correlation (r) squared represents the percentage of variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the variation in the independent variable.

In this case, r squared is 0.8 squared, which equals 0.64 or 64%. Therefore, 64% of the variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the variation in the independent variable.
if the coefficient of correlation is 0.8, the percentage of variation in the dependent variable explained by the variation in the independent variable can be found by calculating the coefficient of determination (R²). In this case, R^2 = (0.8)² = 0.64, which means that 64% of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the variation in the independent variable. Therefore, the correct answer is:

d. 64%

learn more about coefficient of correlation

https://brainly.com/question/15577278

#SPJ11

The indicated probabilities using the z-scores and the standard normal distribution table are as follows:

The probabilities are found by determining the z-scores and the  standard normal distribution table;

a) mean, μ = of 5.2

standard deviation,σ = 1.4

Using a calculator, the z-score for x = 6 is z = -1.43, and the z-score for x = 9 is z = 1.43.

Using the standard normal distribution table, the area between these z-scores is approximately 0.4236.

b) mean, μ = 30.4

standard deviation, σ = 4.6

Using a calculator, the z-score for x = 25 is z = -1.83, and the z-score for x = 32 is z = 0.87.

Using the standard normal distribution table, the area between these z-scores is approximately 0.6915.

Learn more about standard normal distribution table at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ1

c. The slope, b1, in this problem represents the change in the value of a sports franchise for every unit increase in the annual revenue generated by the franchise.
d. The predicted mean franchise value of a sports team that generates $200 million of annual revenue is $342.32 million

c. The slope, b1, in this problem represents the change in the value of a sports franchise for every unit increase in the annual revenue generated by the franchise. In other words, it represents the rate at which the value of a franchise increases with an increase in revenue.

d. To predict the mean franchise value (in millions of dollars) of a sports team that generates $200 million of annual revenue, we can use the regression equation:

Value = b0 + b1(Revenue)

Where b0 is the intercept and b1 is the slope. From the data table, we can calculate the values of b0 and b1:

b0 = 11.32
b1 = 1.63

Substituting these values and the given revenue value of $200 million into the equation, we get:

Value = 11.32 + 1.63(200) = 342.32

Therefore, the predicted mean franchise value of a sports team that generates $200 million of annual revenue is $342.32 million.

The meaning of the slope (b1) and predict the mean franchise value for a sports team with $200 million annual revenue.

The slope (b1) in this problem represents the relationship between a sports team's value and its annual revenue. A positive slope indicates that as the annual revenue increases, the franchise value also increases. In other words, a higher revenue-generating sports team will typically have a higher franchise value.

To predict the mean franchise value (in millions of dollars) for a sports team with $200 million annual revenue, we would need the equation of the linear regression line. The equation is typically in the form y = b0 + b1x, where y is the franchise value, x is the annual revenue, b0 is the y-intercept, and b1 is the slope.

Unfortunately, the data table and specific values for b0 and b1 are not provided. If you can provide those, I can help you make the prediction.

To learn more about mean, click here:

brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

To sketch and describe the locus of points in a plane in the interior of a right triangle with sides of 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in. and at a distance of 1 in. from the triangle, we need to first understand what a locus of points is.

A locus of points refers to the set of points that satisfy a given condition.
In this case, the given condition is that the points must be located at a distance of 1 in. from the right triangle with sides of 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in. To visualize this, we can imagine a circle with a radius of 1 in. drawn around each of the three vertices of the triangle.
The locus of points that we are interested in is the region that is enclosed by these three circles. This is because any point that is located within all three circles is at a distance of 1 in. from each of the three sides of the right triangle.
We can see that this region takes the shape of a smaller triangle that is located in the interior of the original right triangle. This smaller triangle has sides that are each 2 in. shorter than the corresponding sides of the original triangle.
To summarize, the locus of points in a plane in the interior of a right triangle with sides of 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in. and at a distance of 1 in. from the triangle is a smaller triangle that is located in the interior of the original triangle. This smaller triangle has sides that are each 2 in. shorter than the corresponding sides of the original triangle.

To learn more about the locus of points, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/5218942

#SPJ11

The inequality is represented as;

x/2 - 4 ≤  10

x  ≤ 28

Inequalities are described as the relation such that make an uneven comparison between two numbers, expressions or even variables.

The different signs of inequality are;

From the information given, we have that;

four less than the quotient of a number and two is no more than ten what is the number

Let the number be x

This can then be represented as;

x/2 - 4 ≤  10

x/2 ≤  10 + 4

x/2  ≤  14

x  ≤ 28

Learn more about inequalities at: https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

The option that is a valid claim is:

The number of milk chocolate pieces is between 115 and 120 pieces.

The correct option is the last option.

From the question, we are to determine the valid option about the claim.

From the given information,

A sample of chocolate from the local candy shop contained 17 milk chocolate pieces out of a sample of 50. An entire batch of chocolate contains 350 pieces

To determine the option about the population that is valid claim, we will determine the number of milk chocolate in an entire batch.

We know that

17 are milk chocolate out of a sample of 50.

Let the number of milk chocolate in an entire batch be x.

If there 17 milk chocolate out of 50 samples

Then,

There will be x chocolate out 350 samples

50 × x = 350 × 17

x = (350 × 17)/ 50

x = 119

Thus,

The 119 milk chocolates in an entire batch

The valid claim is:

The number of milk chocolate pieces is between 115 and 120 pieces.

Learn more on Determining the valid option here: https://brainly.com/question/29354141

#SPJ1

The percentage of students with a GPA of at least 1.76 is 100% - 2.5% = 97.5%.

In a bell-shaped distribution, the empirical rule states that approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% within two standard deviations, and 99.7% within three standard deviations.

To find the percentage of students with a GPA of at least 1.76, we need to calculate the number of standard deviations between the mean (2.52) and 1.76.

(2.52 - 1.76) / 0.38 ≈ 2 standard deviations below the mean

Since 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations of the mean, and we're considering two standard deviations below the mean, the remaining 5% is split between the tails. Therefore, 2.5% of the students have a GPA below 1.76.

Know more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ11

The power series representation for f(x) = 1/(1-x) centered at x=0 is:

1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...

To find a power series representation for a function, we can use the formula:

f(x) = ∑(n=0 to infinity) [an(x-a)^n]

where a is the center of the series and an is the coefficient of the (x-a)^n term.

For example, let's find a power series representation for the function f(x) = 1/(1-x) centered at x=0:

Using the formula, we have:

f(x) = ∑(n=0 to infinity) [an(x-0)^n]

To find the coefficients an, we can use the formula for the geometric series:

1/(1-x) = 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...

So, we have:

an = [x^n]/n!

Substituting this into the power series formula, we get:

f(x) = ∑(n=0 to infinity) [(x^n)/(n!)](x-0)^n

Simplifying, we get:

f(x) = ∑(n=0 to infinity) [(x^n)/(n!)]

Therefore, the power series representation for f(x) = 1/(1-x) centered at x=0 is:

1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...

Learn more about the Series:

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The equation which can be used to find the value of "x" is "3x = 2x-3", and the value of "x" is x= -3.

In geometry, a "Tangent" to a circle is a straight line that intersects the circle at exactly one point, known as the point of tangency. The tangent line is always perpendicular to the radius of the circle at the point of tangency.

We know that, the two tangent drawn from an "external-point" to the two pints touching the circle are equal.

So, we can write, CH = BH and FH = GH;

Substituting the values of CH, BH and FH , GH;

We get,

⇒ 3x = 2x - 3      and      3y + 2 = 5y

⇒ x = -3               and     y = 1;

Therefore, the value of "x" is -3 and value of "y" is 1.

Learn more about Tangent here

https://brainly.com/question/12054622

#SPJ1

We can expect Camilla to have about 11 aces in a game where she attempts 25 serves.

If Camilla serves an ace 44% of the time on average, then we can expect her to serve an ace in 44 out of every 100 serves.

We can use this information to estimate how many aces she is likely to have in a game where she attempts 25 serves:

Expected number of aces = (44/100) × 25

Expected number of aces = 11

Therefore, we can expect Camilla to have about 11 aces in a game where she attempts 25 serves.

To learn more on Percentage click:

https://brainly.com/question/24159063

#SPJ1

Answer:

Its B!

Step-by-step explanation:

:)

The constant of proportionality is expressed as a fraction in reduced terms as: k = 1/9.

The constant of proportionality is a constant which represents the rate at which one variable vary directly with another variable, proportionately.

For example, if x and y are the two variables, and y is dependent on x, therefore:

Constant of proportionality (k) = y/x.

The table given as shown in the attachment shows a relationship between v and w. Therefore, we have:

Constant of proportionality (k) = 16/144 = 7/63 = 4/36

Constant of proportionality (k) = 1/9

Learn more about Constant of proportionality on:

https://brainly.com/question/1835116

#SPJ1

Answer:

-3 + 8 = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

-8 + 3 = -5

3 + (-8) = -5

-3 + 8 = 5

8 + 3 = 11

Answer:

16 tiles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

option c :

If the 80 votes not cast were for McClellan, Lincoln still had the majority.

Step-by-step explanation:

McClellan won the popular vote but not the electoral vote.

not true because he clearly lost both

Lincoln won the popular vote but not the electoral vote.

not true because he clearly won both

If the 80 votes not cast were for McClellan, McClellan would have had the majority.

not true because 21 + 80 is not larger than 212.

so process of elimination