The condition that is understood by the parties to be part of their agreement, but is not included in their express contract, is called an "implied-in-fact condition". So the correct option is B .
An implied-in-fact condition is a term that is not explicitly stated in a contract but is inferred from the circumstances surrounding the contract and the conduct of the parties.
Implied-in-fact conditions can arise when the parties act in a way that is consistent with a certain expectation, even if that expectation is not explicitly stated in the contract. For example, if a construction contract specifies that the contractor will build a house according to certain plans and specifications, it may be implied that the contractor will use reasonable care and skill in carrying out the work, even if that term is not explicitly stated in the contract.
Learn more about express contract,
https://brainly.com/question/19908088
#SPJ4
Are there practical considerations to develop mass transit rail in a large city? Explain in detail why you feel that way.
Answer:
Yes, there are many practical considerations to developing mass transit rail in a large city. Here are some of the key reasons why:
Explanation:
Cost: Developing mass transit rail is expensive, and the cost of building and maintaining the system must be balanced against the potential benefits. This requires careful planning and budgeting to ensure that the project is financially sustainable.
Infrastructure: Building a mass transit rail system requires significant infrastructure, including tracks, stations, and power supply. This infrastructure must be carefully designed and maintained to ensure the safety and reliability of the system.
Land Use: Developing mass transit rail may require significant changes to land use, including the acquisition of land for tracks and stations. This can be a contentious issue in densely populated areas, where land is at a premium and property values are high.
Environmental Impact: Developing mass transit rail may have a significant impact on the environment, including air and noise pollution. These impacts must be carefully considered and mitigated to ensure that the system is sustainable and has a minimal impact on the surrounding community.
Integration: Mass transit rail must be integrated with other forms of transportation, such as buses, bikes, and pedestrian walkways. This requires careful planning and coordination to ensure that the system is accessible and convenient for users.
Public Support: Developing mass transit rail requires public support and buy-in. This includes engaging with the community to address concerns and ensure that the system meets their needs.
In summary, developing mass transit rail in a large city requires careful planning and consideration of many practical factors, including cost, infrastructure, land use, environmental impact, integration, and public support. Despite these challenges, a well-designed and properly maintained mass transit rail system can provide significant benefits to a city, including reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality, and increased access to jobs and amenities.
Answer:
thy is are you doing are you doing the is going
the first amendment prohibits state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. true or false
False. The first amendment does not prohibit state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. In fact, the government has the power to regulate commercial speech to prevent false or misleading advertising that could harm consumers.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, but it does not entirely prohibit state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. States can regulate deceptive or misleading commercial speech to protect consumers and maintain fair competition.
learn more about deceptive
https://brainly.com/question/13045267
#SPJ11
presidents typically nominate people to lower-court judgeships ______.
Presidents typically nominate people to lower-court judgeships who share the same political party as they do
Presidents generally nominate members of their own political party to serve as judges on lesser courts. The reason for same is that presidents frequently seek to pick judges who share their policy objectives and who would interpret law in a manner consistent with their political philosophies. Presidents have occasionally chosen to nominate members of the opposing party or independent candidates.
When a president wants to foster bipartisanship or when there are no suitable candidates from their own party available, this may occur. In the end, choosing judges for lower courts is a crucial and frequently contentious procedure that may have a big impact on the nation's legal system and the course of public policy.
Read more about the political party on:
https://brainly.com/question/29557623
#SPJ4
Presidents typically nominate people to lower-court judgeships with the aim of advancing their political and ideological goals. These nominations are important because lower court judges play a crucial role in shaping the law and interpreting the Constitution.
When a vacancy arises in a lower court, the president will usually work with his administration and legal advisers to identify potential nominees who align with his party's values and legal philosophy.
This may include individuals who have a track record of supporting the president's policy positions, or those who have a history of interpreting the law in a way that is consistent with the president's preferred approach.
The president's nominations to lower courts must be confirmed by the Senate, which can be a contentious and partisan process. The Senate Judiciary Committee will usually hold hearings to scrutinize the nominee's qualifications and legal views, and Senators from both parties may seek to use the confirmation process to score political points or advance their own ideological agendas.
To learn more about Presidents
https://brainly.com/question/11616771
#SPJ4
On average, the Supreme Court hears _________ cases each year
a. one thousand b. seven hundred
c. four hundred d. fewer than a hundred
e. twenty-five
On average, the Supreme Court hears fewer than a hundred cases each year. The correct option is d.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and one of its key functions is to review and interpret federal law and the Constitution. However, the Court is highly selective in the cases it hears, and only takes a small percentage of the cases that are presented to it.
This selectivity is due to several factors, including the Court's limited resources and the desire to focus on the most significant legal issues. By hearing fewer cases, the Court is able to give each case more attention and ensure that it has adequate time to fully consider the legal and constitutional questions at issue. The correct option is d.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
why agency by estoppel forces a principal to be bound by an unauthorized contract.
Answer:
Explanation:
Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.
The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.
For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.
In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
When a private citizen makes the decision to run for public office, what right do they relinquish? O Right to privacy O Right to bear arms Right to free speech Right to vote
When a private citizen makes the decision to run for public office, they relinquish their right to privacy to some extent, as their personal life and background become subject to public scrutiny and media attention.
When a private citizen decides to run for public office, they typically relinquish their right to privacy to some extent. This is because as a public figure, their actions and personal life may become subject to greater scrutiny and media attention. However, it is important to note that the extent to which privacy is relinquished can vary depending on the specific position being sought and the individual's personal boundaries. Other rights, such as the right to bear arms, free speech, and vote, are typically not relinquished by running for public office.
learn more about decision
https://brainly.com/question/14616216
#SPJ11
what is the source(s) of law the court would have to look to in order to decide which state is the correct place for the lawsuit to be brought? (constitution? common law ? a statute? a regulation? )
The court would have to look to a variety of sources of law in order to decide which state is the correct place for the lawsuit to be brought. These sources may include the constitution, common law, statutes, and regulations. In particular, the court may consider any relevant state or federal laws that govern the subject matter of the lawsuit,
as well as any applicable rules of civil procedure or jurisdictional rules that determine where a case may be brought. Ultimately, the court's decision will be based on a careful analysis of all relevant legal authorities and the facts of the case.
To determine the correct place for a lawsuit to be brought, the court would primarily look at the jurisdiction and venue rules, which are derived from a combination of sources, including statutes, regulations, and common law. In some cases, constitutional provisions may also be relevant. The specific source of law will depend on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case.
learn more about lawsuit
https://brainly.com/question/19573641
#SPJ11
regulated by common law in most states, a _ permits arrest by private citizens when an individual is lawfully derived of his or her freeom
The term you are looking for is "citizen's arrest." Citizen's arrest is regulated by common law in most states and permits arrest by private citizens when an individual is lawfully deprived of his or her freedom.
This typically occurs when someone is caught committing a crime or has reasonable suspicion of being involved in a criminal act.This means that a private citizen can arrest someone if they witness them committing a crime or have reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a crime. However, there are limitations and guidelines for citizen's arrests to prevent vigilantism and ensure the safety and rights of all individuals involved.
Learn More about citizen's arrest. here :-
https://brainly.com/question/27982994
#SPJ11
what should you include in the opening of a direct claim message? a justification of your request an explanation of the problem followed by a threat a clear statement of the problem
When opening a direct claim message, it is important to include a clear statement of the problem. This helps to ensure that the recipient understands the issue at hand and can take appropriate action to resolve it. It is also important to provide a justification for your claim.
which explains why you feel entitled to the resolution you are seeking. However, it is not advisable to include a threat in your opening message, as this can come across as confrontational and unprofessional. Instead, focus on presenting your case in a clear and concise manner, and allow the recipient to respond before considering any further action. In the opening of a direct claim message, you should include a clear statement of the problem. This approach helps to effectively communicate the claim and ensures that the recipient understands the issue without introducing threats or unnecessary justifications.
learn more about recipient
https://brainly.com/question/10570062
#SPJ11
in the 1970s, public opinion about preventive detention began to change, leading to the following:
In the 1970s, public opinion about preventive detention began to change, leading to a shift in criminal justice policies and practices.
The shift away from preventive detention reflected a growing recognition that incarceration should be used as a last resort, and that criminal justice policies should be guided by evidence-based approaches that are effective, efficient, and equitable.
Preventive detention is the practice of detaining individuals before trial or conviction, based on the belief that they pose a danger to society if released.
The change in public opinion was driven in part by concerns about the potential abuse of preventive detention, as well as by the recognition that it violated principles of due process and the presumption of innocence.
In 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of United States v. Salerno that preventive detention was constitutional under certain circumstances, but only if it was used sparingly and in the context of a narrowly tailored statute.
To know more about preventive detention here:
https://brainly.com/question/4144723
#SPJ4
jin, an actor, has filed suit against an online tabloid for using a photo of him on its website. the basis for jin's complaint is:
An online tabloid has been sued by actor Jin for using a photo of him on its website. Appropriation is the basis for Jin's complaint.
In a lawsuit, Angelina Jolie claims that Brad Pitt physically abused her and their children during their 2016 fight. Jolie claims that Pitt was "physically and emotionally" abusive on a private plane traveling from France to Los Angeles in a cross-complaint regarding ownership of a French winery.
To get Jolie away from him, Pitt hurled himself in reverse into the plane's seats harming Jolie's back and elbow," the recording says. " The kids rushed in and bravely attempted to shield one another. One of the children was choked by Pitt, and another was struck in the face.
Sensationalist reporting is, sort of well known, to a great extent dramatic news-casting that takes its name from the configuration of a little paper, generally a portion of the size of a standard broadsheet.
To learn more about tabloids here
https://brainly.com/question/29711796
#SPJ4
requirements for disease reporting in the united states are mandated by what entity?
In the United States, the requirements for disease reporting are mandated by state and local health departments.
Each state has its own laws and regulations that require healthcare providers, laboratories, and other entities to report certain communicable diseases to the state or local health department. These laws and regulations also specify what diseases must be reported, the time frame for reporting, and the method of reporting.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a federal agency, provides guidance and support to state and local health departments for disease surveillance, investigation, and control. The CDC also maintains the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS), a national system that receives and aggregates data on notifiable diseases from state and local health departments.
While the federal government does not mandate disease reporting requirements, it plays a role in supporting and coordinating disease surveillance and response efforts across states and localities through agencies such as the CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
To know more about local health departments here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500670
#SPJ4
Under the Securities Acts of 1975, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board was created and empowered to regulate all of the following EXCEPT:
A. disclosure of new information by municipal issuers
B. recordkeeping and settlement procedures of municipal broker-dealers
C. disclosure of information on confirmations to customers
D. suitability requirements for making recommendations of municipal securities
Under the Securities Acts of 1975, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board was created and empowered all of the following except to regulate suitability requirements for making recommendations of municipal securities. The correct option is D.
Suitability requirements for making recommendations of municipal securities are regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which is the self-regulatory organization for the securities industry.
FINRA is responsible for setting standards for securities firms and brokers, including rules regarding suitability, and enforcing those rules through disciplinary actions.
The Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, also known as the "Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) Amendments," were a set of reforms to the securities laws that established the MSRB as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for the municipal securities market.
The MSRB is responsible for creating rules and regulations to protect investors in the municipal securities market and promote a fair and efficient market for these securities. Therefore, the correct option is D.
To know more about Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board here:
https://brainly.com/question/17327643
#SPJ4
what is two-point discrimination? where on the body is it the shortest and which is the longest?
Two-point discrimination is a test used to measure the sensitivity of the skin to touch. It involves using two pointed objects to touch the skin at varying distances apart and determining if the person can feel one or two points. The distance between the two points is gradually decreased until the person can no longer distinguish between one or two points.
The area of the body with the shortest two-point discrimination is the fingertips, which can distinguish between two points that are as close as 2-3 mm apart. The area with the longest two-point discrimination is the back, which requires a distance of 40-60 mm between two points for the person to distinguish them as separate.
Two-point discrimination is the ability to perceive two distinct points of touch as separate when they are applied to the skin simultaneously. It is a measure of tactile spatial acuity and varies across different body parts. The shortest two-point discrimination is found on the fingertips, where sensitivity is the highest. The longest two-point discrimination is typically found on areas like the back or thighs, where sensitivity is lower and larger distances between points are required for them to be perceived as separate.
learn more about sensitivity
https://brainly.com/question/14057226
#SPJ11
Which of the following describes how criminal law has changed regarding same-sex
relations?
The Supreme Court declared that the federal government had no position on
state laws that made same-sex relations between consenting adults criminal
were constitutional and eventually outlawed same-sex marriage.
The Supreme Court declared that state laws that made same-sex relations
between consenting adults criminal were unconstitutional but did not legalize
same-sex marriage in all states.
The Supreme Court declared that the federal government had no position on
state laws that made same-sex relations between consenting adults criminal.
The Supreme Court declared that state laws that made same-sex relations
between consenting adults criminal unconstitutional and eventually legalized
same-sex marriage
The correct Option is the Supreme Court declared that state laws that made same-sex relations between consenting adults criminal were unconstitutional but did not legalize same-sex marriage in all states. Option B
What are the criminal laws on same-sex relations?In the United States, criminal laws that targeted same-sex relations were widespread until recent decades. However, over the last few decades, the legal landscape has undergone significant changes, with the Supreme Court playing a crucial role in this transformation.
In 2003, the Supreme Court declared that state laws that criminalized same-sex relations between consenting adults were unconstitutional in the landmark case of Lawrence v. Texas. This decision invalidated such laws across the country and represented a major step forward for LGBTQ+ rights.
In subsequent years, the Supreme Court issued several decisions that expanded LGBTQ+ rights, including the legalization of same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015 with the case of Obergefell v. Hodges.
Therefore, the correct option is: The Supreme Court declared that state laws that made same-sex relations between consenting adults criminal were unconstitutional but did not legalize same-sex marriage in all states.
Read more on criminal laws at:https://brainly.com/question/30712009
#SPJ1
Select the answer that contains no problem with pronoun reference, pronoun-antecedent agreement, or pronoun case.
a)The baby would not stop crying. This annoyed the babysitter.
b) A babysitter today charges more than they did ten years ago.
c) The little girl did not stop crying until she and the babysitter went to the park.
The baby will not stop wailing. The babysitters were perplexed since they had no difficulty with pronoun reference, pronoun-precedent agreement, or pronoun case. Here option A is the correct answer.
Option b) "A babysitter today charges more than they did ten years ago." contains a problem with the pronoun-antecedent agreement. The singular noun "babysitter" is followed by the plural pronoun "they". To correct this, it would be better to use a gender-neutral singular pronoun, such as "they" or "their", or to rewrite the sentence to avoid using a pronoun altogether.
Option c) "The little girl did not stop crying until she and the babysitter went to the park." is grammatically correct and contains no problems with pronoun reference, pronoun-antecedent agreement, or pronoun case. The pronoun "she" clearly refers to the little girl, and the subject-verb agreement is correct.
To learn more about babysitters
https://brainly.com/question/27229532
#SPJ4
Americans tend to prefer government programs whose benefits they feel have been _____ in some way.Choose matching definition
shared
paid
earned
owned
Answer: Earned
Explanation: i just did this quiz and got it right
Lawyers must always do what their clients ask them to do.
False True
Answer: False
Explanation: I'm smart
A carbon tax which is designed to reduce pollution is an example of a _____.
a. command-and-control policy.
b. government administrative rule.
c. noneffective incentive.
d. market-based policy.
A carbon tax which is designed to reduce pollution is an example of a Market-based policy Therefore the correct option is D.
A carbon tax is a market-based policy designed to reduce pollution by placing a price on greenhouse gas emissions, usually through the imposition of taxes or other charges on those who produce the emissions.
It is intended to encourage businesses and individuals to choose cleaner energy sources and production methods that generate fewer emissions. The taxes are based on the amount of carbon dioxide (or other pollutant) emitted and are set at high enough levels that they discourage or even prohibit certain polluting activities.
Hence the correct option is D
To know more about greenhouse gas visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4509458
#SPJ4
a police officer stops a car for a traffic violation. the officer conducts a legal search of the vehicle after obtaining consent from the driver. the officer discovered stolen property and a large amount of illegal prescription drugs in the car. the driver is given a choice to be charged with felony possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance or cooperate with the police to identify and arrest the source of the drugs. what process is the officer using?
A police officer stops a car for a traffic violation and conducts a legal search of the vehicle after obtaining consent from the driver. the process is known as flipping.
Flipping is a strategy by which law enforcement turns a suspect into an informant to acquire data and make more arrests. In the hypothetical situation, the motorist is offered the option of working with law enforcement to find and apprehend the source of the narcotics or facing substantial criminal charges.
In exchange for their help, drivers who collaborate with the police become their informants and may receive a less sentence or other rewards. While flipping can be a useful tool for law enforcement, there are still doubts regarding its moral implications and the possibility of putting informants in peril or having them give false information.
Read more about traffic violation on:
https://brainly.com/question/28301000
#SPJ4
The use-of-force continuum offers guidelines for the appropriate level of response based on the level of
The use-of-force continuum offers guidelines for the appropriate level of response based on the level of threat presented by a suspect or subject.
The use-of-force continuum is a model used by law enforcement agencies to define the levels of force that are appropriate in various situations, depending on the level of resistance or threat presented by a suspect or subject.
The continuum typically consists of a series of levels or stages, each of which represents a different level of force that may be used in response to a particular type of resistance or threat. The levels may range from verbal commands and passive physical control to the use of non-lethal force, such as pepper spray or batons, and ultimately to deadly force, such as the use of firearms.
To know more about "force continuum ". here
https://brainly.com/question/20143412
#SPJ4
only one party entering into a contract must possess characteristics that qualify him or her as competent for a valid contract to exist. true or false
The given statement "only one party entering into a contract must possess characteristics that qualify him or her as competent for a valid contract to exist" is false because for a contract to be legally binding, all parties must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
For a valid contract to exist, all parties entering into the contract must possess characteristics that qualify them as competent.
Competence refers to a person's legal ability to enter into a contract, which generally means that the person must be of legal age, have the mental capacity to understand the terms and consequences of the contract, and not be under duress or undue influence.
If any party to the contract lacks competence, the contract may be voidable or unenforceable.
To know more about valid contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/6491012
#SPJ4
In the context of the legal system, to declare someone insane is to determine that the person.a. Trueb. False
True. In the context of the legal system, to declare someone insane means to determine that the person is not capable of distinguishing between right and wrong or understanding the nature and consequences of their actions.
This determination is typically made by a court of law or by mental health professionals who evaluate the person's mental state and capacity. The legal standard for insanity varies by jurisdiction, but in general, it requires a significant impairment in mental function that prevents the person from being responsible for their criminal actions. The insanity defense is a legal defense that can be used in criminal trials, where the defendant argues that they were legally insane at the time of the crime and therefore cannot be held criminally responsible.
To know more about " legal system". here
https://brainly.com/question/10456202
#SPJ4
what altitude may a pilot on an ifr flight plan select upon receiving a vfr-on-top clearance?
A pilot on an IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) flight plan may select any altitude upon receiving a VFR-on-top clearance.
A VFR-on-top clearance allows the pilot to fly in VFR (Visual Flight Rules) conditions while maintaining an IFR flight plan. This means that the pilot can choose their own altitude, rather than being restricted to an assigned altitude from air traffic control. The pilot must, however, remain in VFR conditions and be able to maintain visual separation from other aircraft and terrain.
The VFR-on-top clearance is typically given when the weather conditions are suitable for VFR flight but the airspace is busy, and it allows the pilot more flexibility in their flight planning.
Learn more about Instrument Flight Rules at:
brainly.com/question/31083610
#SPJ4
the query will generate all the combinations of the rows in the department
False. The query will generate a result set that includes all the combinations of the rows in the DEPARTMENT table with all the rows in the EMPLOYEE table, but it will not explicitly show the 1:M relationship between the two tables.
Instead, the result set will show a Cartesian product, or cross join, of the two tables, where each row in the DEPARTMENT table is paired with every row in the EMPLOYEE table. This can result in a very large result set, especially if there are many rows in each table.
To explicitly show the 1:M relationship between the two tables, you would need to use a join condition that links the DEPARTMENT_CODE column in the EMPLOYEE table to the CODE column in the DEPARTMENT table, like this:
Learn more about DEPARTMENT
https://brainly.com/question/11539179
#SPJ4
Full Question ;
Given the tables DEPARTMENT(CODE, NAME) and EMPLOYEE(ID, NAME, DEPARTMENT_CODE) in a 1:M relationship, and the command:
SELECT *
FROM DEPARTMENT, EMPLOYEE
t/f: The query will generate all the combinations of the rows in the DEPARTMENT table with all the rows in the EMPLOYEE table.
There are several threats that specifically apply to one-group, pretest/posttest experiments. Match each threat to the correct definition More participants from one group or condition decline to continue participating than from another. attrition threat Participant behavior changes spontaneously over time. maturation threat Participants' future performance is changed because of their interaction with a measure. testing threat Participants' responses are altered by an event outside the control or interest of the study. history threat Extreme scores gravitate back toward average. regression threat The way the researcher measures a variable changes over the course of an experiment. instrumentation threat
Each threat can be matched to the correct definition as;
More participants from one group or condition decline to continue participating than from another. (attrition threat)Participant behavior changes spontaneously over time.(maturation threat)Participants' future performance is changed because of their interaction with a measure. (testing threat)Participants' responses are altered by an event outside the control or interest of the study. (history threat)Extreme scores gravitate back toward average. (regression threat)The way the researcher measures a variable changes over the course of an experiment.(instrumentation threat)What are threat?A threat is an expression of intent to cause harm or damage to someone or something. It can come in various forms, including verbal, physical, or written.
Threats can be made by individuals, groups, or even nations, and can be motivated by a range of factors such as anger, revenge, ideology, or financial gain. Threats can be directed at individuals, organizations, or society as a whole, and may be communicated through a variety of channels such as social media, email, or face-to-face communication.
Learn more about threat at:
https://brainly.com/question/29655308
#SPJ1
If you hire a financial planner to advise you long-term on investments and diversifying your portfolio, how are they most likely going to charge you for their services?(1 point)
Responses
a fee for every phone call they make to you
a fee for every phone call they make to you
a commission from your portfolio
a commission from your portfolio
a retainer
a retainer
a daily rate
What is the Certified Investment Management Analyst?(1 point)
Responses
a certification that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of financial planning
a certification that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of financial planning
a designation that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of portfolio management and investment
a designation that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of portfolio management and investment
a license that allows financial advisors to operate across several states
a license that allows financial advisors to operate across several states
a license that allows you to sell insurance
hey most likely going to charge you for their services a retainer
What is a retainerFinancial planners typically charge for their services in one of three ways: fees, commissions, or a combination of both. In the case of long-term investment and portfolio advice, they are more likely to charge a fee for their services, either as a retainer (a fixed fee for an agreed-upon period of time) or as a percentage of the assets they manage for you.
This fee structure ensures that the planner's interests are aligned with yours, as they will not receive any additional compensation based on specific investment recommendations or actions taken on your behalf.
Read nore on financial planning here:
https://brainly.com/question/1985202
#SPJ1
Answer: Continuing Education Unit Test
Explanation:
1. A student loan, A scholarship.
2. A four-year college offers classes in many different subjects, and a technical school offers training in one skill or trade.
3. Training is learning something with the goal of performing a skill, and education is about gaining theoretical knowledge.
4. Collage.
5. It is a scholarship given to students with financial needs.
6. Private scholarships are awarded by organizations or schools, while public scholarships are government-awarded.
7. Help finding a job close to campus.
8. A CFP.
9. A commission from your portfolio.
10. A designation that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of portfolio management and investment.
11. A designation that recognizes your skills and knowledge in the area of financial planning.
12. The low student/teacher ratio could suggest that students have access to additional teaching resources which provides support and ensures higher graduation rates.
13. The university selects the right students to admit and provides the right level of education, financial and other support to ensure that the student can be successful.
14. Vocational training.
15. Someone with higher qualifications.
The FSLA outlaws the once-common practice of sending school-age children to work instead of to school by imposing restrictions on hiring workers _______.Choose matching definition
under 9 years of age
under 2 years of age
under 18 years of age
one and one-half
The FSLA outlaws the once-common practice of sending school-age children to work instead of to school by imposing restrictions on hiring workers C. under 18 years of age.
The FSLA, or Fair Labor Standards Act, is a federal law that was enacted in 1938 to regulate the employment practices of businesses in the United States. One of the main objectives of the FSLA is to protect the rights of workers, especially those who are most vulnerable to exploitation, such as children.
Before the FSLA was enacted, it was not uncommon for school-age children to be sent to work instead of attending school. This practice was particularly prevalent in rural areas where families relied on the income of their children to make ends meet. However, the FSLA changed this by imposing strict restrictions on the employment of workers under the age of 18.
In summary, the FSLA outlaws the once-common practice of sending school-age children to work instead of attending school by imposing restrictions on hiring workers under 18 years of age. The law aims to protect the rights of workers, especially children, and ensure that can receive an education and develop their full potential.
Know more about FSLA here:
https://brainly.com/question/27331747
#SPJ11
broadly, the dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act seeks to:
Dodd-Frank Act seeks to create a more stable and transparent financial system that is better equipped to serve the needs of consumers and promote long-term economic growth.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law in 2010, is a comprehensive regulatory reform package that aims to address the root causes of the 2008 financial crisis and to provide greater protection for consumers.
The law has several key objectives, including:
Increasing transparency and accountability in the financial system by requiring more stringent reporting and disclosure requirements for financial institutions. Reducing systemic risk by creating a framework for monitoring and regulating large financial institutions that could pose a threat to the overall economy.
Strengthening consumer protections by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is tasked with regulating financial products and services and ensuring that consumers are treated fairly. Promoting financial stability by providing regulators with new tools to address emerging risks and vulnerabilities in the financial system.
To learn more about Dodd-Frank Act
https://brainly.com/question/28030775
#SPJ4
Enforcement of MSRB rules for bank dealers is performed by all of the following EXCEPT the: A. Office of Comptroller of Currency B. Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board C. Federal Reserve Board D. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation does not perform enforcement of MSRB rules for bank dealers. The correct option is d.
The MSRB (Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) is a self-regulatory organization that regulates and oversees the municipal securities industry, including bank dealers. The MSRB sets rules and standards for dealers in the municipal securities market, and monitors compliance with these rules.
Enforcement of MSRB rules for bank dealers is primarily performed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which is responsible for overseeing national banks and federal savings associations. The OCC has the authority to examine and supervise bank dealers for compliance with MSRB rules.
The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) also has some regulatory authority over bank dealers, as it is responsible for regulating and supervising state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System.
Overall, the enforcement of MSRB rules for bank dealers is a collaborative effort between various regulatory agencies, including the MSRB, OCC, and FRB. Therefore, the correct option is d.
To know more about MSRB rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/30242115
#SPJ4
