A consumer filed a products liability action against a manufacturer in federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. Prior to trial, the manufacturer filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony by an expert on the consumer's witness list on the grounds that it was based on subjective belief and unsupported speculation. After holding a hearing, the judge granted the manufacturer's motion. Because of this ruling and the consumer's inability to produce other evidence in support of her case, the judge granted the manufacturer's subsequent motion for summary judgment. The consumer appealed the judgment, contending that the district court judge had erroneously excluded the testimony of the consumer's expert.
In reviewing this challenge to the trial court's ruling, what standard should the appellate court apply?
Abuse of discretion, because the judge had made an evidentiary ruling.
Absence of a genuine dispute and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, because the ruling affected the summary judgment motion.
A preponderance of the evidence, because the ruling was outcome determinative.
Clearly erroneous, because the ruling was made by the judge.

Yes, the court in specific conditions can put a lien on a private property.

Lien is the right over another persons property to keep in possession in exchange of debt generated until the debt is paid. Lien is placed on a private property to escape from the risk of fraud or default in payment of the loan credited to the owner of the property by the lien holder. The court may consider reason stated by the plaintiff to put a lien over a property. And in cases when the debt is not repaid the creditors can sell the mortgaged property in order to fulfill their loss. Therefore, lien can be involuntary.

To know more about "lien" visit-

brainly.com/question/30118274

#SPJ4

If Sam is at fault, the Indiana court will use the conflicts of law principles to decide. Due to Sam's negligence, this would be a tort action, hence Indiana law would be used under a conflict of laws principles.

What was the conflict of laws principles?

Conflict of laws refers to a discrepancy between the laws that apply to a dispute from two or more different jurisdictions. The law that is chosen to address the conflict will determine the case's outcome. There may be a conflict between the laws of various nations, federal and state laws, or even laws within a single state.

Which law should be applied to resolve the case when there are competing laws is the main issue that arises. When selecting the legal standard to use in a case, courts follow a certain procedure. This procedure is referred to as characterization or classification in the legal community.

To learn more about conflict of laws principles visit;

https://brainly.com/question/16102825

#SPJ4

This description is consistent with a federal system of government. In a federal system, each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters, and the states or provinces have a formal venue for influencing national policy.

This structure allows for a balance of power between the central government and the states and provinces, which can have their own constitutions, laws, and elected officials. The federal government typically has authority over matters of national importance, such as foreign policy and defense, while the states and provinces have authority over matters of local importance, such as education and taxation.

To learn more about federal system of government link is here

brainly.com/question/30154201

#SPJ4

The main power of the jurisdiction is the limits to which extent a legal body, court or authority can exercise its powers.

It is an authority or power to the courts which is given by the laws to render justice and provide judgments. Jurisdiction depends on the circumstances of the cases and can vary from case to case. A court cannot give judgment or render justice if it doesn't have the jurisdiction.

It can be determined by the subject matter of the case, personal jurisdiction (issue took place in which area) and the territory.

To know more about Justice, click here: brainly.com/question/15930187

#SPJ4

The ability to enforce a child support order is not subject to any statute of limitations.

Prior to 1993, the statute of limitations governing support orders was governed by the previous California Civil Code section 4833. The old code allowed a warrant of execution to be used to execute a child support or family support judgement without prior court approval up to five years after the kid turned majority age, and then only for amounts that were up to ten years past due.

The law in California was changed in 1992 to allow spousal and family support orders to be upheld until they are paid. Therefore, until they are paid in full, all child support orders are still valid.

To learn more about child support orders, please refer:

https://brainly.com/question/22691960

#SPJ4

Answer:

They Follow laws

Explanation:

The US citzenda follow laws

Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.

Hence, the correct option is A.

Criminal laws is a body of law that apply to criminal acts. The main theories for criminal law are: to deter a crime, to reform the perpetrator, to provide retribution for the act, and to prevent further crimes. The main aim of criminal law is to prevent others from doing a crime by punishing the individuals committing the crime. Punishment of a criminal activity can specified on the basis of severity of the crime from penalties to capital punishment such as death penalty or imprisonment for life. Crime is social evil and it can harm an individual or a society but its impact is harmful for each member of the society, and to protect the society from such evils the criminal law was framed.

To know more about "Criminal laws" visit-

brainly.com/question/14529086

#SPJ4

The Preamble is the first ten amendments that identify citizens' freedoms. This is a false statement.

The Bill of Rights is the first of the Constitution's ten Amendments. It describes Americans' constitutional rights in regard to their government. It safeguards an individual's civil liberties and rights, such as their right to freedom of expression, of the press, and of religion.

It establishes the fundamentals for due process of law by transferring to the people or the states all the powers not delegated to the federal government. Additionally, the first ten amendments Constitution states that "the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution must not be construed to be exclusive of or to diminish other rights held by the people."

To learn more about first ten amendments, please refer:

https://brainly.com/question/13163035

#SPJ4

If the couple has a legitimate claim to the shared driveway, they can file a lawsuit to enforce that claim. This is done by filing lawsuit against their neighbour to compel them to allow access or by asking for an injunction to compel them to use the neighbor's driveway.

A co-owner cannot seek an injunction against the other co-owner with regard to land acquired jointly since ownership by one co-owner is regarded as possession by both.

If a co-owner or his transferee is removed from joint possession, he has the right to joint possession through litigation and is not required to file a partition lawsuit. A co-sharer may bring a claim for possession on behalf of all co-sharers or for the division and possession of the plaintiff's share.

To know more about legitimate claim, visit:

brainly.com/question/30020455

#SPJ1

The tobacco regulation Act supervises the legal product of cigarettes in the country.

What is the Tobacco regulation Act?

Republic Act No. 9211, often referred to as the Tobacco Regulation Act of 2003, is an all-encompassing regulation that controls, among other things, smoking in public places, tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, and sales limitations. The Tobacco Regulation Act of 2003's Implementing Rules and Regulations were published by the Inter-Agency Tobacco Committee. The Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Committee are thorough and address a wide variety of tobacco control issues. The Consumer Act of the Philippines (Rep. Act No. 7394) handles false, deceptive, or misleading advertising generally in addition to the restrictions on advertising, promotion, and sponsorship in Rep. Act No. 9211 and the Implementing Rules and Regulations.

To learn more about Tobacco regulation Act visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28465321

#SPJ4

A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.

The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.

According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.

As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on management, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29023210

#SPJ1

You have 180 days from the alleged incident to submit a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission.

You must lodge a complaint or request an investigation 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination or retaliation, so keep that in mind. An EEOC office near you can accept written complaints or ones made in person.

Calling the EEOC at 1-800-669-4000 or visiting the EEOC's Field Office List and Jurisdiction Map and choosing the office closest to you can help you locate the nearest EEOC office. The appropriate internal complaints committee or the local complaints committee must receive this complaint within three months of the incident.

Learn more about employment Visit: brainly.com/question/29318513

#SPJ4

States' rights was the concept used by secessionists to support their views.

Hence, the correct option is B.

The idea of states' rights held that each state had the right to govern itself and make decisions independent of the federal government.

This concept was often used by those who supported secession as a justification for leaving the Union during the American Civil War.

They argued that since the federal government was violating states' rights by attempting to restrict or abolish slavery, secession was necessary to protect those rights.

This philosophy was enshrined in the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution, which stated that any powers not specifically granted to the federal government were reserved for the states.

To know more about secessionists here:

https://brainly.com/question/12605343

#SPJ4

The juxtaposition of being in opposition or ideas that are completely contrast in the essence of each other are called as the figure of speech, antithesis.

The antithesis is a figure of speech that may be taken into interpretation as the one wherein the ideologies defined within a sentence or a statement are completely in contrast or opposition to each other. Moreover, it is noteworthy to mention that an antithesis does not define the ideology, but identifies the opposing ideas that they tend to reflect as an effect of the same.

Learn more about antithesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/11610465

#SPJ4

Answer:

The rise of dual federalism in the United States was largely the result of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which outlined a system of government with separate powers and responsibilities for the federal government and the states. This system was further strengthened by the 10th Amendment, which clarified that all powers not explicitly delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. This created a balance of power between the two levels of government, with the federal government having control over issues that affected the entire nation and the states having control over more localized matters. This system of dual federalism ensured that both levels of government would have a role to play in the United States.

Answer:

Dual federalism, also known as layer cake federalism, is a political arrangement in which the power of the federal government and state governments are clearly defined and separated. The rise of dual federalism can be attributed to several factors, including:

The U.S. Constitution: The Constitution outlines the division of power between the federal government and the states, with the federal government having specific, enumerated powers and the states having residual powers. This division of power helped to establish the framework for dual federalism.

The Marshall Court: The Marshall Court, in several landmark cases such as Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland, established the principle of judicial review and solidified the power of the federal government.

The Civil War: The Civil War settled the issue of states' rights and reinforced the power of the federal government, further solidifying the principles of dual federalism.

The Progressive Era: The Progressive Era saw a rise in activism and a call for greater regulation of business, which led to a growth in federal power. This increased federal power helped to further establish dual federalism as the dominant system of government in the United States.

Explanation:

Overall, the rise of dual federalism was due to a combination of constitutional principles, judicial decisions, and historical events that helped to establish and reinforce the division of power between the federal government and state governments.


ALLEN

Answer:

Explanation

Cohen's argument about gang-related stealing is a significant contribution to the sociological study of deviant behavior. In his book "Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang," Cohen argues that gang members engage in theft as a form of recreation, a means of demonstrating their skills and toughness, and a way to gain status and recognition within their peer group. This idea challenges the conventional wisdom that theft is motivated by economic need or poverty.

Regarding the idea of short-run hedonism, Cohen argues that adolescents, including gang members, tend to focus on immediate pleasure and gratification rather than long-term goals and consequences. This perspective has been influential in shaping our understanding of adolescent behavior and decision-making.

The group autonomy and attraction of gangs for adolescents can be attributed to several factors, including a sense of belonging, peer pressure, a desire for excitement and adventure, and the perceived benefits of gang membership, such as protection, money, and status. Parents and family members can help reestablish their relationships with gang-involved youth by maintaining open and non-judgmental communication, seeking professional support, and involving the youth in positive activities and alternatives to gang involvement.

Miller's theory of lower-class culture and its associated focal concerns is still relevant and widely studied today. According to Miller, lower-class individuals have unique focal concerns, such as toughness, smartness, excitement, fate, and autonomy, that are shaped by their experiences of poverty and marginalization. Whether or not one agrees with Miller's theory may depend on personal experiences and exposure to different socio-economic contexts.

The lack of a positive male role model, such as a father figure, can contribute to a male juvenile's decision to join a gang, as it may lead to a search for a sense of belonging and identity. Single mothers can take steps to minimize the likelihood of gang involvement by providing their children with positive male role models, such as mentors, coaches, or community leaders, and by engaging their children in activities and opportunities that promote positive development.

Miller's six focal concerns for lower-class adults and eight focal concerns for adolescents have been widely studied and debated in the sociological literature. The continued relevance of these focal concerns today suggests that they capture important dimensions of lower-class culture and experience. However, it is also possible that new focal concerns may have emerged in response to changes in society and the experiences of lower-class individuals over time.

Based on the theories and arguments discussed, it can be concluded that:

Gang-related theft is not solely motivated by economic need but can also be driven by social and cultural factors, such as a desire for recognition and status within a peer group.

Adolescents, including gang members, tend to focus on immediate pleasure and gratification, which can lead to risk-taking behavior.

Gangs can be attractive to adolescents for various reasons, including a sense of belonging, peer pressure, and the perceived benefits of gang membership. Parents and family members can play a crucial role in preventing gang involvement and reestablishing relationships with gang-involved youth.

Lower-class individuals have unique focal concerns shaped by their experiences of poverty and marginalization. The lack of a positive male role model can contribute to a male juvenile's decision to join a gang.

Miller's theory of lower-class culture and its associated focal concerns remains relevant and widely studied today, although it is possible that new focal concerns may have emerged over time.

It is important to note that these theories are not absolute and should be considered in light of other factors that may influence gang involvement and lower-class culture.

It is called declaring their candidacy when someone announces they are running for president.

In order to declare their candidacy, individuals must meet the requirements of their state's election laws, which can vary by state. Generally, this includes filing paperwork with the appropriate election official, such as a Secretary of State or county election board, and paying a required filing fee.

Some states may also require that the candidate file a nominating petition with signatures from registered voters. When someone announces they are running for president, they are declaring their candidacy and beginning their campaign journey.

To learn more about election board link is here

brainly.com/question/2873847

#SPJ4

Option 1 is Correct. In accordance with the rule of law, a government official: Has unrestricted decision-making power.

An Absolute Monarchy and Absolutism are closely related in that the reigning person has "absolute" power and is unchallenged by any legal, electoral, or other means. In a dictatorship, the lives of the populace are completely under the authority of the ruling party.

A single individual—typically a king or queen—holds total, autocratic power in an absolute monarchy. Under absolute monarchy, the throne normally passes via a reigning family, with the succession of power being hereditary. A political notion known as "sovereignty" designates absolute power or supreme authority. In a monarchy, the "sovereign" holds absolute power.

Learn more about government Visit: brainly.com/question/28320231

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

According to the rule of law, a government leader:

1. Has absolute authority to make decisions

2. Is excluded from "We the People"

3. Must follow the laws like everyone else

4. Has more rights than ordinary citizens

The given statement "this passage most accurately reflects the democratic ideals taken from the enlightenment." is True about the passage.

Because the theories and ideas of an intellectual enlightenment were more efficient and useful in making the US Constitution. Main purpose of this was to improve society with the help of different rights and freedoms such as freedom of expression and equality.

The concept of enlightenment emerged in the 18th century in Europe. Social Contract is one of the main components of enlightenment. It focused on the faith, collectiveness, and a belief that govern people.

To know more about equality, click here: brainly.com/question/21164041

#SPJ4

The passage reads as follows: "we hold truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Thus, to secure these rights, governments are instructed among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

Answer:

The role of an appointed judge is different from that of an elected official in several ways. Appointed judges are selected by a governor, president, or another appointing authority and serve for a set term, typically for life or until they reach a certain age. They are expected to make decisions based on the law and the facts of each case, rather than political considerations or public opinion.

However, there are also similarities between the two roles. Both appointed judges and elected officials serve the public and are expected to act with integrity and impartiality. Additionally, both can be removed from office for cause, such as misconduct or a violation of ethical standards. Ultimately, the ultimate goal of both appointed judges and elected officials is to serve the best interests of the public and ensure justice is done.

There are 12 regional circuit courts of appeal are in the federal system of United States.

The united states has 12 regional level circuit courts that sit below the supreme court of United States. There are 94 federal districts which are divided into 12 regional circuits, with an accompanying appeals court. These courts of appeal here to judgements from other court and interpret it whether the decision given is correct or not. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals in specialty issues, such as those concerning patent laws, and decisions determined by the Supreme Court. The court of appeal hears cases from the district court and its other regional circuit courts.

To know more about "regional circuit courts" visit-

brainly.com/question/2487611

#SPJ4

The first policymaker believes in equal distribution of the national cake, which means everyone gets the same amount regardless of their individual needs or contributions.

The second policymaker believes in fair distribution, which means distributing resources in a way that takes into account individual needs and contributions.

The third policymaker believes in giving everyone their due, which means ensuring that everyone gets what they are entitled to based on their contributions and needs.

To make progress in this scenario, the policymakers can engage in constructive dialogue, listen to each other's perspectives, and seek common ground.

Read more about economics here:

https://brainly.com/question/25745683

#SPJ1

Nuisance ordinances laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.

Nuisance ordinances, likewise alluded to as a crime-free ordinance or a disorderly house ordinance, is a nearby regulation typically passed on the town, city, or district level of government that plans to legitimately rebuff the two landowners and occupants for violations that happen on a property or in an area. These regulations force punishments under programs alluded to as disturbance reduction when wrongdoings are accounted for, whether or not violations really happened or what the police activity involved.

The consequence of these laws is for property managers to tell occupants to not report wrongdoings, decline to restore the rent of anybody engaged with revealing a wrongdoing, and expulsion of inhabitants engaged with any violations, regardless of whether the inhabitants were the casualties of said violations.

As per the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), while allies of these mandates contend that they forestall crimes in the region under the laws, the genuine outcome is rather a decrease in by and large open security and mischief brought to casualties of wrongdoing, especially those experiencing homegrown maltreatment, that are dissuaded from revealing the crime carried out against them.

To know more about laws,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/8903161

#SPJ4

Consequences of not reporting foreign contacts' travel or business dealings may result in Disciplinary action (civ), Loss of employment or security clearance, UCMJ/Article 92 (mil), and Criminal charges

What is Disciplinary action?

Employees who cause problems or do not abide by corporate laws and procedures may face disciplinary action.

The disciplinary measures implemented should be viewed largely as a remedial action meant to stop additional misconduct or subpar work.

Warning: This is the mildest type of punishment and is typically used for minor offenses. These are administered orally with extreme caution. You can issue verbal or written warnings.

Written Notice: When a warning does not stop an employee's misconduct, it is important to issue a written notice that suggests a specific punishment.

To learn more about Disciplinary action visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30296795

#SPJ4

The given attestation "  when congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent". is False because

At the point when congress needs to control an issue, it most frequently passes extremely definite guidelines with the goal that there are no inquiries concerning its aim.

A administrative agency depicted about that framed by empowering regulation likewise gives the position to lay out guidelines that will authorize and carry out the law. A bill doesn't become regulation until it is passed by the lawmaking body and endorsed by the chief.

Statute is another word that is utilized reciprocally with regulation. Regulations are otherwise called Demonstrations of Congress. Exactly when a bill is passed in unclear construction by both the Senate and the House.

Learn more about congress regulation:

https://brainly.com/question/12921514

#SPJ4

For many years, there have been limits set on the amount of sugar that foreign producers can sell in the U.S. market. This is mandated by the tariff rate quota system.

What is the tariff rate quota system?

A tariff-rate quota (TRQ), often known as a tariff quota, is a two-tiered tariff system used to control imports of goods. It combines import quotas with tariffs.

A TRQ demands a higher tariff rate for imports of a certain product in excess of a certain quantity while allowing a lower tariff rate for imports of that product within a certain number. As an illustration, a nation might permit the entry of 5,000 tractors at a 10% tariff rate. However, a 30% tariff would apply to any tractors imported in excess of this amount.

A TRQ scheme does not limit the number of imported goods, in contrast to a straightforward quota system. An "out-of-quota commitment" is added to the "in-quota commitment."

To learn more about tariff rate quota system visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29034025

#SPJ4