A number has the digit nine in seven to the nearest 10 the number rounds to 100 what is the number?

The radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).

a. To minimize the surface area of a cylindrical soda can, we need to find the values of radius and height that minimize the surface area equation.

Let's denote the radius of the can as r and the height as h. The volume of the can is given as 354 cm^3, so we have:

πr^2h = 354

Solving for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π[tex]r^2[/tex])

The surface area of the can can be calculated as follows:

A = 2πr^2 + 2πrh

Substituting the expression for h in terms of r, we get:

A = 2πr^2 + 2πr(354 / πr^2)

Simplifying:

A = 2πr^2 + 708 / r

To minimize the surface area, we need to find the value of r that makes the derivative of A with respect to r equal to zero:

dA/dr = 4πr - 708 / r^2

Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:

4πr = 708 / r^2

Multiplying both sides by r^2, we get:

4πr^3 = 708

Solving for r, we get:

r = (708 / 4π)^(1/3) ≈ 3.64 cm

Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π(3.64)^2) ≈ 9.29 cm

Therefore, the radius and height of the cylindrical soda can with minimum surface area and volume of 354 cm^3 are approximately 3.64 cm and 9.29 cm, respectively.

b. Real soda cans do not seem to have an optimal design because their dimensions are not the same as the ones obtained in part (a). The radius of a real soda can is 3.1 cm and the height is 12.0 cm. However, real soda cans have a double thickness in their top and bottom surfaces, which means that their dimensions are not directly comparable to the dimensions of the cylindrical can we calculated in part (a).

To find the dimensions of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area, we can use the same approach as in part (a), but with the appropriate modification to the surface area equation:

A = 4πr^2 + 708 / r

Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:

8πr^3 = 708

Solving for r, we get:

r = (708 / 8π)^(1/3) ≈ 2.89 cm

Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π(2.89)^2) ≈ 13.15 cm

Therefore, the radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).

To learn more about surface area  visit: https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason I would choose C is that the penny doubling each day might seem small but the amount would continue to grow exponentially giving you a might higher payoff than the rest of the options. I don't know the exact amount you would get by it is around 3 mill.

Option B gives you linear growth, which means that by the end of 30 days, you would only have 750,000.

Option A is the worst potion only leaving you with 1 million.

In other words, the system has infinitely many solutions, parameterized by the values of the free variables a and b.

The final step of the Gauss-Jordan elimination can be interpreted as the following system of equations:

x1 - 2x2 + 21x3 = 0

x4 + x5 = 1

x6 - 2x7 = 0

x8 + x9 = 1

From the second and fourth equations, we can conclude that x4 and x8 are free variables, which means they can take on any value. Let's set them to be a and b, respectively.

Then, using the first and third equations, we can solve for x2, x3, x5, and x7 in terms of a and b:

x2 = (21/2)a - (1/2)b

x3 = a/2 - (21/4)b

x5 = 1 - a

x7 = b/2

Finally, substituting these values into the remaining equations, we can solve for x1 and x6:

x1 = 2x2 - 21x3 = -19a + (209/4)b

x6 = 2x7 = b

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is:

x1 = -19a + (209/4)b

x2 = (21/2)a - (1/2)b

x3 = a/2 - (21/4)b

x4 = a

x5 = 1 - a

x6 = b

x7 = b/2

x8 = a

x9 = 1 - a

In other words, the system has infinitely many solutions, parameterized by the values of the free variables a and b.

To learn more about parameterized visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14762616

#SPJ11

The resulting decrease in sales is $17,083.27.

In a competitive market, many producers are in direct competition with one another in order to offer the goods and services that customers like you and me want and need. In other words, no single producer has the power to control the market.

Here in competitive market, the given formula is S = 15000 ln(1 + 0.02x)

When x = 500, S = 15000 ln(1 + 0.02(500)) = 15000 ln(11) ≈ $46,247.43

When x = 1000, S = 15000 ln(1 + 0.02(1000)) = 15000 ln(21) ≈ $76,155.25

If x is decreased from $500 to $100 per month, the percentage decrease is (500-100)/500 = 0.8 or 80%

To find the resulting decrease in sales, we need to calculate the difference in sales when x=500 and x=100.

When x = 500, S = 15000 ln(1 + 0.02(500)) = 15000 ln(11) ≈ $46,247.43

When x = 100, S = 15000 ln(1 + 0.02(100)) = 15000 ln(3) ≈ $29,164.16

The resulting decrease in sales is $46,247.43 - $29,164.16 ≈ $17,083.27.

Learn more about competitive market visit: brainly.com/question/28267513

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

In a competitive market, the volume of sales depends on the amount spent on advertising the product in question. If "x" dollars are spent per month advertising a particular product; It was determined that the sales volume "S" per month (in dollars) is given by the sig. Formula

Find the sales volume when x=500 v x=1000. If "x" is decreased from $500 to $100 per month,

What is the resulting decrease in sales?

The scatter plot shows that there is no strong correlation between average weight and life expectancy for the 12 dog breeds. The coefficient of correlation for this adult weight data to be -0.123, which is very near to 0.

The adult weight of a person can vary greatly depending on several factors, including genetics, age, gender, height, muscle mass, and overall health. However, a healthy weight range for adults is typically determined by body mass index (BMI), which is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared.

We can use the average weight as the x-value and the average life expectancy as the y-value to represent the data as ordered pairs. Following are the ordered pairs for the provided data:

(125, 57.5)

(62.5, 49)

(12, 16)

(12.3, 12)

(11, 11)

We may plot these ordered pairs on a scatter plot to show the form of the data. As for the story:

We can observe from the scatter plot that there is no obvious pattern formed by the data points. There is no discernible pattern or connection between the two variables, and the spots are dispersed throughout the plot. As a result, the data's shape can be described as random or dispersed.

We can calculate the correlation coefficient to provide more evidence for this. The variables do not have a linear relationship if the correlation coefficient is close to zero. we can calculate the coefficient of correlation for this data to be -0.123, which is very near to 0.

To learn more about adult weight visit:

https://brainly.com/question/395419

#SPJ4

The  limit of the function as x approaches infinity is infinity.

To evaluate this limit, we can use L'Hospital's rule, which says that if we have an indeterminate form of the type 0/0 or infinity/infinity, we can differentiate the numerator and denominator separately with respect to the variable of interest, and then take the limit again.

In this case, we have infinity/infinity, so we can apply L'Hospital's rule:

\begin{aligned}
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8x}{2\ln(12e^x)} &= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8}{\frac{2}{12e^x}}\\
&= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8}{\frac{1}{6e^x}}\\
&= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} 48e^x\\
&= \infty
\end{aligned}

Therefore, the limit of the function as x approaches infinity is infinity.

Visit to know more about Limit:-

brainly.com/question/30339394

#SPJ11

Based on the information, csc(0) - sin(0) = cot(0) cos(0) is a valid identity.

lim x→0+ csc(x) = ∞

lim x→0- csc(x) = -∞

Recall that cot(0) is undefined, as the cotangent function has a vertical asymptote at x=0. However, we can still simplify the expression by using the limit definition of the cotangent function as x approaches 0:

lim x→0+ cot(x) = ∞

lim x→0- cot(x) = -∞

Since both sides simplify to ∞, we can say that the identity holds.

Therefore, csc(0) - sin(0) = cot(0) cos(0) is a valid identity.

Learn more about identity on

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights are 60% for debt financing and 40% for equity financing

To find Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights for debt and equity financing, you need to first identify the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), after-tax cost of debt financing, and cost of equity financing.

The information provided is as follows:
- WACC: 9.0%
- After-tax cost of debt financing: 7%
- Cost of equity financing: 12%

Let's use the formula for WACC:

WACC = (Weight of Debt * Cost of Debt) + (Weight of Equity * Cost of Equity)

Since the weights of debt and equity financing must sum up to 1, we can represent the weight of debt as "x" and the weight of equity as "1-x". Now, we can rewrite the formula:

9.0% = (x * 7%) + ((1-x) * 12%)

Now, solve for x (weight of debt financing) and 1-x (weight of equity financing):

9.0% = 7x + 12 - 12x
9.0% = 12 - 5x
5x = 3%
x = 0.6

The weight of debt financing is 0.6, and the weight of equity financing is 1-0.6 = 0.4.

Therefore, Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights are 60% for debt financing and 40% for equity financing.

Capitalhttps://brainly.com/question/30590270

#SPJ11

Using proportions, it is found that 8 more seventh graders are involved in the yearbook.

What is a proportion?

A proportion is a fraction of a total amount.

Researching the problem on the internet, it is found that 10% of the 6th graders and 18% of the 7th graders are on the yearbook, hence:

0.1 x 280 = 28 6th graders.

0.18 x 200 = 36 7th graders.

36 - 28 = 8

8 more seventh graders are involved in the yearbook.

S U T is a basis of Rn, and we have

dim(S U T) = dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

which confirms that S and T are complementary subspaces of Rn.

(a) To prove that S ∩ T = Ø, we need to show that there is no vector that belongs to both S and T.

Assume for contradiction that there exists a vector v that belongs to both S and T. Then, since v is in T, it is orthogonal to all vectors in S, including itself. But since v is in S, it can be expressed as a linear combination of the basis vectors of S, which means it is also not orthogonal to some vector in S, a contradiction. Therefore, S ∩ T = Ø.

(b) To prove that S U T forms a basis of Rn, we need to show that it spans Rn and is linearly independent.

(i) Spanning property: Let x be any vector in Rn. Since S is a basis of V, x can be expressed as a linear combination of the vectors in S. Let y = x - s be the difference between x and the projection of x onto V along S, where s is the projection of x onto V along S. Then y is orthogonal to V, and thus y is in T. Therefore, x = s + y, where s is in V and y is in T. Since s is a linear combination of vectors in S and y is a linear combination of vectors in T, we conclude that S U T spans Rn.

(ii) Linear independence: Assume that there exist scalars c1, c2, ..., cn and d1, d2, ..., dm such that

c1v1 + c2v2 + ... + cnvn + d1w1 + d2w2 + ... + dmwm = 0

where 0 is the zero vector in Rn. We want to show that all the ci's and di's are zero.

Since the vectors in S are linearly independent, we know that c1 = c2 = ... = cn = 0. Thus, the equation reduces to

d1w1 + d2w2 + ... + dmwm = 0

Since the vectors in T are also linearly independent, we know that d1 = d2 = ... = dm = 0. Therefore, S U T is linearly independent.

Since S U T spans Rn and is linearly independent, it forms a basis of Rn.

(c) We know that S is a basis of V, so dim(V) = |S| = s. Let S' be the orthogonal complement of S in Rn, i.e., S' = {x in Rn: x is orthogonal to all vectors in S}. Then, dim(S') = n - s.

We also know that T is a basis of V', the orthogonal complement of V in Rn. Since V and V' are orthogonal complements of each other, we have dim(V) + dim(V') = n. Therefore, we have

dim(T) = dim(V') = n - dim(V) = n - s

Adding the dimensions of S and T, we get

dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

Therefore, S U T is a basis of Rn, and we have

dim(S U T) = dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

which confirms that S and T are complementary subspaces of Rn.

To learn more about complementary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5708372

#SPJ11

The equivalent expressions are given as follows:

The general format of the exponential expression is given as follows:

[tex]a^{\frac{n}{m}}[/tex]

To obtain the radical form, we have that:

Hence the radical form of the exponential expression is given as follows:

[tex]a^{\frac{n}{m}} = \sqrt[m]{a^n}[/tex]

More can be learned about the radical form of expressions at brainly.com/question/28519153

#SPJ1

The area of the composite figure is 29 feet squared.

A five-sided figure with a flat top labelled 5 and one-half feet.  A height labelled 4 feet. The length of the entire image is 9 ft.

Therefore, the area of the composite figure can  be found as follows;

The figure can be divide into two shapes which are rectangle and a triangle.

Hence,

area of the composite figure = area of the rectangle + area of the triangle

area of the rectangle = 4 × 5.5 = 22 ft²

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 bh

where

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 × 4 × (9 - 5.5)

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 × 4 × 3.5

area of the triangle = 14 / 2

area of the triangle = 7 ft²

Therefore,

area of the composite figure = 22 + 7

area of the composite figure = 29 ft²

learn more on area here: https://brainly.com/question/31272718

#SPJ1

The answer for your math question is x= 12.44, x = 0.56

The partial sum for the power series which represents the function 1/(1-x³) consisting of the first 5 nonzero terms is: 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² and the radius of convergence is 1.

The formula for the partial sum of a power series is given by:

Sₙ(x) = a₀ + a₁x + a₂x² + ... + aₙxⁿ

where a₀, a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ are the coefficients of the power series.

In this case, we can use the formula for the geometric series to find the coefficients:

1/(1-x³) = 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² + ...

a₀ = 1

a₁ = 1

a₂ = 1

a₃ = 0

a₄ = 0

and so on.

Therefore, the first 5 nonzero terms of the power series are 1, x³, x⁶, x⁹, and x¹².

The radius of convergence for this power series can be found using the ratio test:

lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|aₙ₊₁/aₙ| = lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|x³/(1-x³)| = 1

Since the limit equals 1, the radius of convergence is 1.

To know more about  power series, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16407904#
#SPJ11

Based on the information, we can see from the line plots that Bus 14 tends to have longer travel times than Bus 18 for most of the data points, except for a few outliers.

In terms of travel time, Bus 14 and Bus 18 each have a median of 16 minutes. As such, it cannot be inferred from this information alone which mode of transportation tends to arrive more rapidly.

Nevertheless, the line plots reveal that Bus 14's journey takes slightly longer than Bus 18's for most of the data points, except for a few outliers.

Learn more about median on

https://brainly.com/question/26177250

#SPJ1

To prove that 1/xy = 1/x * 1/y, we can start by multiplying both sides of the equation by xy.

Multiplying both sides of the equation by xy gives us:

1 = xy * 1/x * 1/y

Next, we can simplify the right-hand side by canceling out the x and y terms that appear in both the numerator and denominator:

1 = y/x + x/y

To further simplify this expression, we can multiply both sides by xy:

xy = y^2 + x^2

This equation can be rearranged to get:

x^2 + y^2 = xy

Finally, we can use the formula for the sum of squares:

x^2 + y^2 = (x+y)^2 - 2xy

Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:

(x+y)^2 - 2xy = xy

Simplifying, we get:

(x+y)^2 = 3xy

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

x+y = sqrt(3xy)

Dividing both sides by xy, we get:

1/xy = 1/x * 1/y

Therefore, we have proven that 1/xy = 1/x * 1/y.

To learn more about equations visit : https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ11

The correct shape which have created this three-dimensional object is shown in Option A.

Now, We know that;

When a body is rotating, there is a line that all the parts are turning about.  

The parts farther away from that line travel on larger circle around that line, so they are moving faster.  

Parts closer to the line follow smaller circles and move more slowly as a result.  

Points right on the line do not travel at all.  

Hence, On the diagram you can see the greatest circle, formed by rotation.

The points that form this circle are at the greatest distance from the axis of rotation.

So you can see that only first or second options are true.

But the second one is false, because the figure is not symmetric and therefore, formed shape must not be symmetric too.

Hence: correct option is A.

Learn more about the transformation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30097107

#SPJ1

The length of the inventory cycle in days for the store when using an order quantity of 1,146 units per order is approximately 34.2216 days. To answer your question about the length of the inventory cycle in days for the store using an EOQ model and an order quantity of 1,146 units per order, we'll follow these steps:

Step:1. Calculate the EOQ (Economic Order Quantity) using the given information:
EOQ = √(2DS / H), where D is the annual demand, S is the ordering cost per order, and H is the holding cost per unit per year.
D = 10,054 units per year
S = $69 per order
H = 18% of the unit purchase cost ($83.4) = 0.18 * $83.4 = $15.012 per unit per year
EOQ = √(2 * 10,054 * 69 / 15.012) ≈ 1,146 units (the provided order quantity)
Step:2. Calculate the number of orders per year:
Number of Orders = Annual Demand / Order Quantity = 10,054 / 1,146 ≈ 8.7699 orders per year
Step:3. Calculate the inventory cycle length in days:
Inventory Cycle Length (Days) = (Operating Days per Year) / (Number of Orders per Year) = 300 / 8.7699 ≈ 34.2216 days
Therefore, the length of the inventory cycle in days for the store when using an order quantity of 1,146 units per order is approximately 34.2216 days.

Learn more about inventory cycle here, https://brainly.com/question/29565047

#SPJ11

Assuming that the person transfers their savings to the highest available account as soon as they reach the required minimum amount, the total amount saved at the end of 25 years can be calculated as follows:

Step:1. For the first year, the person saves $4000 in the ordinary account and earns 6% interest, resulting in a total of $4240.
Step:2 In the second year, the person has $8240 and can transfer it to the 'extra' account to earn a higher interest rate of 7%. After one year, they will have $8816.80.                                                                                                                          Step:3. In the third year, the person has $12816.80 and can transfer it to the 'superextra' account to earn the highest interest rate of 8%. After one year, they will have $13856.22.
Step:4. For the remaining 22 years, the person continues to save $4000 at the beginning of each year and transfers their savings to the 'superextra' account to earn 8% interest. At the end of 25 years, they will have a total of $227,217.97.
Therefore, the total amount saved at the end of 25 years, assuming that the money is transferred to a higher-interest account at the earliest opportunity, is $227,217.97.

Lean more about interest here, https://brainly.com/question/29529281

#SPJ11

The Approximate  height after 3 seconds using 6 rectangles is 255.45m

To inexact the stature of the shot after 3 seconds utilizing 6 rectangles, we are able to utilize the midpoint to run the show of guess. Here are the steps:

1. Partition the interim [0, 3] into 6 subintervals of rise to width, which is (3 - 0)/6 = 0.5. The 6 subintervals are:

[0, 0.5], [0.5, 1], [1, 1.5], [1.5, 2], [2, 2.5], [2.5, 3].

2. For each subinterval, discover the midpoint and assess the work v(t) at that midpoint. The stature of the shot at that time can be approximated as the item of the speed and the width of the subinterval.

3. Add up the zones of the 6 rectangles to urge the whole surmised stature(height).

Here are the calculations:

- For the subinterval [0, 0.5], the midpoint is (0 + 0.5)/2 = 0.25. The speed at t = 0.25 is v(0.25) = -15.4(0.25) + 147 = 143.65.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(143.65) = 71.825.

- For the subinterval [0.5, 1], the midpoint is (0.5 + 1)/2 = 0.75. The speed at t = 0.75 is v(0.75) = -15.4(0.75) + 147 = 135.85.

The inexact stature amid this subinterval is 0.5(135.85) = 67.925.

- For the subinterval [1, 1.5], the midpoint is (1 + 1.5)/2 = 1.25. The speed at t = 1.25 is v(1.25) = -15.4(1.25) + 147 = 123.5.

The surmised stature amid this subinterval is 0.5(123.5) = 61.75.

- For the subinterval [1.5, 2], the midpoint is (1.5 + 2)/2 = 1.75. The speed at t = 1.75 is v(1.75) = -15.4(1.75) + 147 = 107.9.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(107.9) = 53.95.

- For the subinterval [2, 2.5], the midpoint is (2 + 2.5)/2 = 2.25. The speed at t = 2.25 is v(2.25) = -15.4(2.25) + 147 = 88.15.

The surmised tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(88.15) = 44.075.

- For the subinterval [2.5, 3], the midpoint is (2.5 + 3)/2 = 2.75. The speed at t = 2.75 is v(2.75) = -15.4(2.75) + 147 = 64.15.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(64.15) = 32.075.

To induce the full inexact tallness, we include the zones of the 6 rectangles:

Add up to surmised height = 71.825 + 67.925 + 61.75 + 53.95 = 255.45

To know more about velocity refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/24445340

#SPJ4

The surface area of the entire prism is 294 ft².

The surface area of the entire prism can be found by summing the areas of the triangular and rectangular faces of the prism.

Since we have two triangular faces and  3 rectangular faces. Thus,

surface area of the entire prism = 2*( 1/2bh) + 3*(L*W)

where b = 6, h = 4, L = 18 and W = 5

surface area of the entire prism = 2*( 1/2 * 6*4) + 3*(18*5)

surface area of the entire prism = 24  + 270

surface area of the entire prism = 294 ft²

Learn more about surface area on:

https://brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

We can find that this probability is 0.99994, rounded to five decimal places.

Based on the given statistic, we know that 80% of vehicles using the Lincoln Tunnel use E-ZPass. Therefore, we can expect that out of the 12 randomly selected vehicles, 80% or 0.8 * 12 = 9.6 vehicles would use E-ZPass. Rounding to the nearest whole number, we would expect 10 of the 12 vehicles to use E-ZPass.

The mode of the distribution is 10, as this is the most frequently occurring value in the sample.

Since 10 out of 12 vehicles is the mode, the probability associated with the mode is the proportion of vehicles that use E-ZPass in the sample. Therefore, the probability associated with the mode is 10/12 or 0.833, rounded to three decimal places.

The probability of four or more vehicles using E-ZPass can be calculated using the binomial distribution. The probability of a single vehicle using E-ZPass is 0.8, and the probability of a single vehicle not using E-ZPass is 0.2. The probability of four or more vehicles using E-ZPass is the sum of the probabilities of selecting 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 vehicles that use E-ZPass. Using Excel or a calculator, we can find that this probability is 0.99994, rounded to five decimal places.

Learn more about "probability": https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

If a merchant bought an item for $50.00 and sold it for 30% more (markup), the item's selling price was $65.00.

The markup is the percentage or amount by which an item is sold.

The markup is based on the cost price.  After adding the markup amount, the selling price is determined to generate some profits for the seller.

The purchase price of an item = $50.00

The markup = 30%

Markup factor = 1.3 (1 + 0.3)

The selling price of the item = $65.00 ($50.00 x 1.3)

Thus, for adding 30% more (markup) on the cost of the item, the selling price is determined as $65.00.

Learn more about markups at https://brainly.com/question/1445853.

#SPJ1

The credit-card purchase price of the item after a 4% discount is $87.50.

To find the credit-card purchase price of the item, we need to first calculate the amount of discount offered for paying in cash. This can be done by multiplying the cash price by the discount rate:

$84 x 0.04 = $3.36

This means that the discount offered for paying in cash is $3.36. To find the credit-card purchase price, we need to add this discount amount back to the cash price:

$84 + $3.36 = $87.36

Therefore, the credit-card purchase price of the item is $87.36. However, this is not the final answer because we need to round it to the nearest cent. The nearest cent is $87.50 since $87.36 is closer to $87.50 than it is to $87.49.

Therefore, the credit-card purchase price of the item is $87.50.

Learn more about discount

https://brainly.com/question/23865811

#SPJ4

The Laplace transform is a mathematical tool used to transform a function of time into a function of complex frequency. The inverse Laplace transform does the opposite, transforming a function of complex frequency back into a function of time.

In MATLAB, you can use the "laplace" function to compute the Laplace transform of a given function. The syntax for the "laplace" function is: laplace(f), where f is the function you want to transform.

For example, in Example 1, the function f(t) = 5sin(3t) is defined using MATLAB's symbolic math toolbox by typing ">>symst" to activate symbolic math, followed by ">>f=5* sin(3*t);" to define the function. The Laplace transform of this function is then computed using the "laplace" function as follows: ">>laplace(f)".

Similarly, in Example 2, the function f(t) = (t - 2)^2U(t - 2) is defined using MATLAB's "heaviside" function to represent the unit step function. The Laplace transform of this function is then computed using the "laplace" function as follows: ">>F=laplace(f)".

https://brainly.com/question/30579487

#SPJ11

The value of x in the diagram to the right is equal to 58°.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a supplementary angle simply refers to two (2) angles or arc whose sum is equal to 180 degrees.

Additionally, the sum of all of the angles on a straight line is always equal to 180 degrees. In this scenario, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the sum of the given angles are supplementary angles:

x + 6 + 116° = 180°

By rearranging and collecting like-terms, the value of x is given by:

x + 122° = 180°

x = 180° - 122°

y = 58°.

Read more on supplementary angle here: brainly.com/question/13250148

#SPJ1

The general solution of the given differential equation is:
r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B, where A and B are constants.

To find the general solution of the given differential equation, we can use the method of separation of variables.
First, we can separate the variables by dividing both sides by (x+1)^2 and multiplying by dx:

r sin(y) dy/(x+1)^2 = dx

Next, we can integrate both sides:

∫ r sin(y) dy/(x+1)^2 = ∫ dx

Using the substitution u = x+1 and du = dx, we get:

∫ r sin(y) dy/u^2 = ∫ du

Integrating both sides again, we get:

- r cos(y)/u + C = u + D

where C and D are constants of integration.

Substituting back u = x+1, we get:

- r cos(y)/(x+1) + C = x+1 + D

Rearranging, we get:

r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B

where A = C+1 and B = D-C-1 are constants.

Thus, the general solution of the given differential equation is:

r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B, where A and B are constants.

To learn more about differential equations visit : https://brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ11