A particle moves along the x-axis with velocity at time tâ¥0 given by v(t)=â1+e1ât.

(a) Find the acceleration of the particle at time t=3.

(b) Is the speed of the particle increasing at time t=3? Give a reason for your answer.

(c) Find all values of t at which the particle changes direction. Justify your answer.

(d) Find the total distance traveled by the particle over the time interval 0â¤tâ¤3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Use z-score table to find the z-score that corresponds to .7000   ( 70%)

approx   .525   s.d.  above the mean

  .525  * 10 =  5.25  points above 100   = 105.25

Answer:

2/3 * 3 = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

We see that one model has 3 parts and 2 of the 3 parts are shaded.  Thus, the fraction for one of the models by itself is 2/3, where 2 is the part shaded, and 3 is the whole (shaded parts + non-shaded parts).  

Since we have three models with the same form and the same part shaded, we can simply multiply 2/3 by 3, which is our multiplication expression and solve:

2/3 * 3 = 6/3 = 2

Answer:

c. 2 pairs of parallel sides

Answer: 3444 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

 1753

+1689

-----------

3444

Add each column:

On angle between a pair of consecutive spokes:

To calculate the angle between a pair of consecutive spokes, use the formula:

angle = 360° / number of spokes

Number of spokes | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12

Angle between a pair of consecutive spokes | 90° | 60° | 45° | 36° | 30°

(i) No, the number of spokes and the angles formed between the pairs of consecutive spokes are not in inverse proportion.

(ii) For a wheel with 15 spokes:

angle = 360° / 15 = 24°

(iii) To calculate the number of spokes needed if the angle between a pair of consecutive spokes is 40 degrees, rearrange the formula to:

number of spokes = 360° / angle

number of spokes = 360° / 40° = 9 spokes.

Find out more on consecutive spokes here: https://brainly.com/question/27062526

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = 1/3 base area * h

               = 1/3 ( 3^2)(6) = 18 ft^3

In the context of factor analysis, the communalities after extraction will always be less than one. This is because the retained factors do not explain all of the variance in the data, as some information has been discarded during the extraction process.

Factor analysis is a statistical method used to identify underlying factors or dimensions that can explain the relationships among a set of observed variables. It aims to reduce the dimensionality of the data, simplifying its structure for easier interpretation and analysis. During this process, some information is inevitably lost, leading to communalities after extraction being less than one.

Communalities represent the proportion of variance in each observed variable that is explained by the extracted factors. A communality of one would indicate that the extracted factors explain all the variance in the observed variable, whereas a communality of less than one means that only a portion of the variance is explained.

In summary, communalities after extraction will always be less than one because the factors retained in the analysis do not account for all of the variance in the data, as some information has been discarded during the extraction process. This partial explanation of variance is a trade-off for reducing the complexity of the data and revealing underlying patterns or structures.

To learn more about variance : brainly.com/question/13708253

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis (H₀) is that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is equal to 0.15, and the alternative hypothesis (H₁) is that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is more than 0.15

In order to determine whether the proportion of customers who try out the samples being offered is more than 0.15, we'll need to set up null and alternative hypothesis for this test.

The null hypothesis (H₀) is the statement that there is no difference or effect, and in this case, it would state that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is equal to 0.15. Mathematically, we can represent this as:
H₀: p = 0.15

The alternative hypothesis (H₁) is the statement that contradicts the null hypothesis, asserting that there is a difference or effect. In this case, it would state that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is more than 0.15. Mathematically, we can represent this as:
H₁: p > 0.15

In summary, for this test, the null hypothesis (H₀) is that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is equal to 0.15, and the alternative hypothesis (H₁) is that the proportion of customers who try out the samples is more than 0.15.

To know more about "Null hypothesis" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681#

#SPJ11

The rectangular tank should have a square base with a side length of approximately 60.97 feet and a height of approximately 121.94 feet, with a steel sheet thickness of approximately 0.82 feet, to minimize its weight.

The dimensions of the tank with minimum weight, we need to use the principle of minimum potential energy. The potential energy of the tank is equal to the weight of the tank multiplied by the height of the center of gravity of the tank.

Let's assume that the side length of the square base is x, and the height of the tank is h. Then the volume of the tank is:

V = [tex]x^2[/tex] * h = 8788 f[tex]t^3[/tex]

Solving for h, we get:

h = 8788 / [tex]x^2[/tex]

The weight of the tank is equal to the product of the area of the steel sheet and its thickness multiplied by the density of steel. Since the tank has an open top, we only need to consider the lateral surface area of the tank, which is equal to:

A = 4xh = 4x(8788 / [tex]x^2[/tex]) = 35152 / x

Let's denote the thickness of the steel sheet by t and the density of steel by ρ. Then the weight of the tank is:

W = A * t * ρ = (35152 / x) * t * ρ

To find the dimensions of the tank with minimum weight, we need to minimize the weight function W with respect to x and t. We can use the method of Lagrange multipliers to do this.

Let's define the Lagrange function as:

L(x, t, λ) = (35152 / x) * t * ρ + λ * ([tex]x^2[/tex] * h - 8788)

Taking the partial derivatives of L with respect to x, t, and λ, and setting them to zero, we get:

∂L/∂x = -35152/([tex]x^2[/tex]) * t * ρ + 2λx = 0

∂L/∂t = 35152/x * ρ + 0 = 0

∂L/∂λ = [tex]x^2[/tex]* h - 8788 = 0

Solving these equations, we get:

t =√(8788 / (2x))

h = 2x

λ = ρ * √(8788 * 2 * ρ)

Substituting these values back into the Lagrange function, we get the minimum weight of the tank:

W = 4 *√(2) * ρ * x * √(8788)

Thus, the dimensions of the tank with minimum weight are:

x = √(8788 / (2 * √(2))) ≈ 60.97 ft

h = 2x ≈ 121.94 ft

t √(8788 / (2x)) ≈ 0.82 ft

The rectangular tank should have a square base with a side length of approximately 60.97 feet and a height of approximately 121.94 feet. The thickness of the steel sheet should be approximately 0.82 feet.

Learn more about  dimensions

brainly.com/question/28688567

#SPJ11

The average rate of change of the function f(x) = √(x-1) over the interval 2≤x≤6 is approximately 0.35.

To find the average rate of change of a function over a given interval, we need to calculate the difference in function values at the endpoints of the interval and divide by the difference in the input values. In this case, we are given the function f(x) = √(x-1) and the interval 2≤x≤6. So, we need to calculate:

[f(6) - f(2)] / [6 - 2]

To do this, we first need to find the function values at the endpoints:

f(6) = √(6-1) = √(5)

f(2) = √(2-1) = 1

Now, we can substitute these values into the formula:

[f(6) - f(2)] / [6 - 2] = [√(5) - 1] / 4

Using a calculator, we can evaluate this expression to the nearest hundredth:

[f(6) - f(2)] / [6 - 2] ≈ 0.35

This means that the function increases at an average rate of 0.35 units for every 1 unit increase in x over this interval.

To learn more about function click on,

https://brainly.com/question/27620141

#SPJ1

The conditions for constructing a confidence interval using a one-sample proportion test are:

A. The data is a random sample from the population of interest. (Choice A)

C. Individual observations can be considered independent (Choice C)

These two conditions apply in this scenario. The sample is randomly selected from the total population of seniors, satisfying the random sample condition (Choice A). Additionally, individual observations (seniors) can be considered independent from each other (Choice C).

Know more about proportion test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30009550

#SPJ11

At least 11 students must take the quiz to assure that at least two have exactly the same answers to all five questions.

Determining the minimum number of students required to guarantee that at least two students have the same answers to all five questions on a multiple choice quiz. Under the area of probability and combinatorics.

There are 4 possible answers for each of the 5 questions, so there are a total of [tex]4^5 = 1024[/tex] possible sets of answers.

Let's consider the opposite scenario where no two students have exactly the same answers to all five questions. In this case, the first student can choose any of the 1024 possible sets of answers. The second student must choose a different set of answers from the first student, so there are 1023 possible sets of answers for the second student. Similarly, the third student must choose a different set of answers from the first two students, so there are 1022 possible sets of answers for the third student. Continuing in this way, the nth student has 1025-n possible sets of answers to choose from.

Therefore, the total number of possible sets of answers for n students is the product of the number of possible sets of answers for each student:

1024 × 1023 × 1022 × ... × (1025-n)

We want to find the minimum value of n such that this product is less than 1024, because that is the maximum number of sets of answers possible. That is, we want to solve the inequality:

1024 × 1023 × 1022 × ... × (1025-n) < 1024

To simplify this expression, notice that each term in the product is very close to 1024, which suggests that we can approximate the product as [tex]1024^n[/tex]. This approximation is valid when n is much smaller than 1024, which is the case here.

Using this approximation, we can rewrite the inequality as:

[tex]1024^n[/tex]< 1024

Taking the logarithm base 2 of both sides, we get:

n < log2(1024) = 10

Learn more about  probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The answer to the integral ∫sec²(3x-2) dx is (1/3)tan(3x-2) + C, where C is the constant of integration. To evaluate the integral ∫sec²(3x-2) dx, we can use the u-substitution method. This method involves selecting a suitable substitution that makes the integral easier to evaluate. In this case, the substitution u = 3x-2 would be useful.

To use u-substitution, we first need to find the derivative of u with respect to x, which is du/dx = 3. We can then solve for dx by dividing both sides by 3, giving us dx = du/3.

Substituting u and dx in terms of u into the integral, we get:

∫sec²(3x-2) dx = ∫sec²u (du/3)

Now we can evaluate the integral by using the formula for the integral of sec²x, which is tan x + C. Substituting back x in terms of u, we get:

∫sec²(3x-2) dx = (1/3)∫sec²u du = (1/3)tan(3x-2) + C

Therefore, the answer to the integral ∫sec²(3x-2) dx is (1/3)tan(3x-2) + C, where C is the constant of integration.

In conclusion, the u-substitution u = 3x-2 is useful in evaluating the given integral, and it allows us to simplify the integral using a well-known formula for the integral of sec²x.

learn more about u-substitution here: brainly.com/question/22401167

#SPJ11

The number of people in Heckleburg after t months is P = (240)t + 3500.

The population after "m" months would be given by the expression P + Am.
Now, we want to find out the number of months it will take for the population to increase by 1,000 people.

Let's call this target population "T".

P = pt + P₀,

where P₀ is the initial population and p is the average increase in population per month.

Since the city increases the population by an average of p people per month, we can write:

p = average increase in population per month

Therefore, the expression becomes:

P = pt + P₀ = p(t) + P₀

Substituting the given values into the expression, we get:

P = (240)t + 3500
So, we need to solve the equation P + Am = T, where T = P + 1000.
Substituting T in the equation, we get P + Am = P + 1000.
Simplifying the equation, we get Am = 1000.
Now, to find the number of months "m", we can rearrange the equation as m = 1000/A.
Therefore, the expression that correctly gives the number of months it will take for the population to increase by 1,000 people is m = 1000/A.
For example, if the average increase in population per month is 50 people, it will take 20 months for the population to increase by 1,000 people (m = 1000/50 = 20).

For similar question on number of people:

https://brainly.com/question/28125154

#SPJ11

The number of people in Heckleburg after t months is P = (240)t + 3500.

The population after "m" months would be given by the expression P + Am.

Now, we want to find out the number of months it will take for the population to increase by 1,000 people.

Let's call this target population "T".

P = pt + P₀,

where P₀ is the initial population and p is the average increase in population per month.

Since the city increases the population by an average of p people per month, we can write:

p = average increase in population per month

Therefore, the expression becomes:

P = pt + P₀ = p(t) + P₀

Substituting the given values into the expression, we get:

P = (240)t + 3500

So, we need to solve the equation P + Am = T, where T = P + 1000.

Substituting T in the equation, we get P + Am = P + 1000.

Simplifying the equation, we get Am = 1000.

Now, to find the number of months "m", we can rearrange the equation as m = 1000/A.

Therefore, the expression that correctly gives the number of months it will take for the population to increase by 1,000 people is m = 1000/A.

For example, if the average increase in population per month is 50 people, it will take 20 months for the population to increase by 1,000 people (m = 1000/50 = 20).

For similar question on number of people.

brainly.com/question/28125154

#SPJ11

The radius of the circle is 21 mm

Remember that for a circle of radius R, the circumference is:

C = 2*pi*R

where pi = 3.14

Here the circumference of the circle is 131.88 mm

Replacing that value in the formula above, we will get the equation:

131.88mm = 2*3.14*R

Solving that for R we get:

R = 131.88mm/(2*3.14) = 21mm

That is the radius.

Learn more about circles at:

https://brainly.com/question/1559324

#SPJ1

Answer:

-10x^2+4x-8   im 75% sure

Step-by-step explanation:

The earthquake in the ocean was about 15.85 times more intense than the one in the city.

The Richter scale is a logarithmic scale used to measure the intensity of earthquakes. Each increase of one on the Richter scale represents a tenfold increase in the amplitude of the seismic waves. Therefore, to find out how many times more intense the earthquake in the ocean was compared to the one in the city, we need to calculate the difference in their Richter scale readings:

8.1 - 6.9 = 1.2

Since each increase of one on the Richter scale represents a tenfold increase in the amplitude of the seismic waves, a difference of 1.2 on the Richter scale means that the earthquake in the ocean was:

[tex]10^{(1.2)} = 15.85[/tex]

times more intense than the one in the city.

for such more question on logarithmic scale

https://brainly.com/question/13473114

#SPJ11

The washing machine's intensity of sound is 31.6 times greater than that of the air conditioner.

Using the formula, we can find the intensity of sound of each appliance. The formula is:

β = 10 log(i/io)

Rearranging the formula, we get:

i = io x 10^(β/10)

For the air conditioner, the noise rating is 50 decibels. Using the known value of the threshold of hearing io = 1 x 10^(-12) watts/m^2, we can calculate the intensity of sound as:

[tex]i_aircon = (1 x 10^(-12)) x 10^(50/10) = 1.0 x 10^(-5) watts/m^2[/tex]

For the washing machine, the noise rating is 65 decibels. Using the same value of io, we can calculate the intensity of sound as:

[tex]i_washing machine = (1 x 10^(-12)) x 10^(65/10) = 3.16 x 10^(-4) watts/m^2[/tex]

To find how many times greater the intensity of sound of the washing machine is compared to the air conditioner, we can divide the intensity of the washing machine by the intensity of the air conditioner:

[tex]i_washing machine / i_aircon = (3.16 x 10^(-4)) / (1.0 x 10^(-5)) = 31.6[/tex]

Therefore, the washing machine's intensity of sound is 31.6 times greater than that of the air conditioner.

Learn more about conditioner here

https://brainly.com/question/17194301

#SPJ11

Rami's grandfather made 23 pieces of 3-foot rope. Rami's grandfather made 23.77 pieces of 3-foot rope from the length of rope he bought.

Rami's grandfather bought a length of rope that cost $0.95 per foot, and he paid a total of $67.83 for it. We can use this information to find the total length of the rope he bought:

Total cost of rope = Total length of rope x Cost per foot

$67.83 = Total length of rope x $0.95 per foot

Total length of rope = $67.83 / $0.95 per foot = 71.3 feet (rounded to one decimal place)

Since Rami's grandfather cut the rope into pieces that were each 3 feet long, we can find the number of pieces he made by dividing the total length of rope by 3:

Number of 3-foot pieces = Total length of rope / Length of each piece

Number of 3-foot pieces = 71.3 feet / 3 feet per piece

Number of 3-foot pieces = 23.77 pieces (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, Rami's grandfather made 23.77 pieces of 3-foot rope from the length of rope he bought. Since he cannot make a fractional part of a piece of rope, we round down to the nearest whole number. Thus, Rami's grandfather made 23 pieces of 3-foot rope.

Learn more about length here

https://brainly.com/question/28108430

#SPJ11

Answer:

387.02

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

387.02

Step-by-step explanation:

The part of the z-score denoting hundredths is found in the interior of the table.

In a standard normal distribution table, also known as a z-table, the z-scores are presented with two parts: the tenths and the hundredths. The tenths are found in the row headings (or sometimes column headings) on the edges of the table, while the hundredths are located in the columns within the interior of the table.

To find a specific z-score in a z-table, first identify the tenths value in the row headings, and then locate the corresponding hundredths value in the columns of the same row. The intersection of the row and column will provide you with the desired probability associated with that particular z-score. The z-table helps in calculating the area under the curve in a standard normal distribution, which is essential for various statistical analyses and probability calculations.

Remember, the z-score is a measure of how far a data point is from the mean in terms of standard deviations. A positive z-score indicates that the data point is above the mean, while a negative z-score indicates that it is below the mean.

Learn more about  z-scores here: https://brainly.com/question/30765368

#SPJ11

It would take approximately 11.43 years to establish 30 stores.

Let's use x to represent the number of years it would take to establish 30 stores.

The store plans to build 4 new stores each year, so in x years, they will have built 4x stores.

That 1 store will go out of business every 3 1/2 years, which can be written as 7/2 years.

So in x years, 30/(4-1/2) = 40 stores will be in operation, and 40/x stores will go out of business.

So, we can write the equation:

40/x = 7/2

Solving for x, we get:

x = 80/7

Let's use x to indicate the period of time needed to open 30 shops.

The retailer intends to construct 4 additional stores year, totaling 4x stores after x years.

Every three and a half years—or seven and a half years—that one store will close its doors.

As a result, 40 stores will be open in x years and 40/x retailers will close their doors.

For similar questions on Store

https://brainly.com/question/27773395

#SPJ11

The equation for the translated function is:

g(x)  =-3x + 1

Remember that a vertical translation of N units can be written as:

g(x) = f(x) + N

If N > 0, the translation is up.

if N < 0, the translation is down.

Here the translation is of 9 units up, then we need to write:

g(x) = f(x) + 9

Replacing f(x) we will get:

g(x) = -3x - 8 + 9

g(x)  =-3x + 1

That is the translated function.

Learn more about translations at:

https://brainly.com/question/24850937

#SPJ1

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

To translate f(x) = -3x - 8, 9 units up, we simply add 9 to the function: g(x) = -3x - 8 + 9 = -3x + 1. Therefore, g(x) is equal to -3x plus one. The slope of g(x) is -3 and the y-intercept is 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

in this graph we r going to see the relation of tge angles so

For angle 1

For angle 2

For angle 3

For angle 4

The same is true for the rest of angles.

It should be noted that (uxv) w is equivalent to the vector 21i + 38j +104k where a=21, b=38, and c=104.

In order to compute (u x v) w, our initial step requires the calculation of the cross product for u and v. This means:

u x v = (7i - 3j + k) x (-5i + 7j + 3k)

= (21i - 38j - 26k)

We can employ the distributive property of the cross product over sum of vectors:

(a+b) x c = a x c + b x c

Therefore, (u x v) w = (21i - 38j - 26k) w

= 21i w - 38j w - 26k w  

As a result, we get: (uxv) w is equivalent to the vector 21i + 38j +104k where a=21, b=38, and c=104.

Learn more about vector on

https://brainly.com/question/25705666

#SPJ1

The value of the missing side is 13. 4

Following the Pythagorean theorem which states that the square of the longest side of a triangle called the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides of that triangle.

These two sides are called the opposite and adjacent sides.

From the information given, we have that;

18² = 12² + x²

Find the square value and substitute

324 = 144 + x²

collect the ,like terms, we have;

324 - 144 = x²

subtract the values

180 = x²

find the square root of the values

x = 13. 4

Learn more about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/1475130

#SPJ1

The missing side of the right triangle is 13.4 units.

A right angle triangle is a triangle that has one of its angles as 90 degrees.  The side of the right angle triangle can be named according to the position of the angles.

Therefore, let's find the value of x using Pythagoras's theorem,

c² = a² + b²

where

Therefore,

18² - 12² = x²

x² = 324 - 144

x² = 180

square root both sides of the equation

x = √180

x = 13.416407865

x = 13.4 units

learn more on right triangle here:https://brainly.com/question/12245115

#SPJ1

The value of the discriminant for the equation -5x^2 - x + 1 = 0 is 21.

A quadratic equation is an algebraic equation of the second degree in x. The quadratic equation in its standard form is ax2 + bx + c = 0, where a and b are the coefficients, x is the variable, and c is the constant term.

To find the discriminant of a quadratic equation in the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, we use the formula:

Discriminant (D) = b^2 - 4ac

For the given equation -5x^2 - x + 1 = 0, we have a = -5, b = -1, and c = 1. Plugging these values into the discriminant formula, we get:

D = (-1)^2 - 4(-5)(1)

D = 1 + 20

D = 21

Know more about equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The set D U A' can be written as D union A complement, where A complement is the set of all tax returns that do not have itemized deductions.

Describing D U A' in words, we can say that it is the set of all tax returns selected for audit or those tax returns that do not have itemized deductions. In other words, it includes all tax returns that either have been selected for audit or do not have itemized deductions, or both.

Learn more about tax returns

brainly.com/question/21214035

#SPJ11