A point is randomly selected in the figure Q={(x,y) : x
2
+y
2
<9,x<0} Find the probability that −2−x

The Miller-Rabin test is a probabilistic primality test that is based on the observation that if a number is prime, certain congruence conditions should hold.

By testing multiple random values, we can determine with a high level of confidence whether a number is prime or composite.

The Miller-Rabin primality test is used to determine if a number is prime or composite. It is based on the observation that if a number, let's call it "p," is prime and satisfies the condition x^2 ≡ 1 mod p, then x ≡ ±1 mod p.

This means that if x is congruent to -1 mod p or p-1 mod p, it indicates that p is likely to be prime.

To use the Miller-Rabin test, we select a number, let's call it "n," to test for primality. We can choose a random number between 2 and n-2.

If n is prime, then for any x between 2 and n-2, the condition x^2 ≡ 1 mod n should hold. However, if n is composite, there will be values of x that do not satisfy this condition.

Here's a step-by-step explanation of the Miller-Rabin primality test:

1. Select a number, n, to test for primality.

2. Choose a random number, a, between 2 and n-2

3. Compute b = a^k mod n, where k = (n-1)/2.

4. If b ≡ 1 mod n or b ≡ -1 mod n, go to step 7.

5. For i = 1 to i = s-1 (where s is a parameter that determines the accuracy of the test):
  - Compute b = b^2 mod n.
  - If b ≡ -1 mod n, go to step 7.
  - If b ≡ 1 mod n, go to step 6.
6. Return "n is composite."

7. Repeat steps 2-6 for a different random number, a.

8. If all the tests pass without finding n to be composite, return "n is probably prime."

The Miller-Rabin primality test can provide a high level of confidence in determining if a number is prime.

By repeating the test with different random values, we can increase the probability of correctly identifying a composite number.

However, it is important to note that the Miller-Rabin test is probabilistic, meaning there is a small chance of falsely identifying a composite number as prime (known as a "false positive").

In summary, the Miller-Rabin test is a probabilistic primality test that is based on the observation that if a number is prime, certain congruence conditions should hold.

By testing multiple random values, we can determine with a high level of confidence whether a number is prime or composite.

To know more about Miller-Rabin test refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33168975

#SPJ11

We have proven that f(x) is an odd function, explained why a0 = 0 in the Fourier series of f(x), calculated the coefficient bn for n ≥ 1, and provided the approach to evaluate the given sum using Parseval's identity.

i. To prove that f(x) is an odd function, we need to show that f(-x) = -f(x) for all x in the domain of f(x). Let's consider the three cases separately:
- For -π ≤ x < 0, we have f(-x) = -(-x+π) = x-π = -f(x).
- For x = 0, we have f(-x) = f(0) = 0 = -f(x).
- For 0 < x ≤ π, we have f(-x) = -(x+π) = -x-π = -f(x).
In all cases, f(-x) = -f(x), which proves that f(x) is an odd function.

ii. In the Fourier series of f(x), the coefficient a0 represents the average value of the function over one period. Since f(x) is an odd function and its graph is symmetric about the origin, the average value of f(x) over one period is zero. Therefore, a0 = 0.

iii. The coefficient bn in the Fourier series of f(x) is given by bn = (1/π) ∫[-π,π] f(x)sin(nx) dx. To calculate this, we consider the three intervals separately:
- For -π ≤ x < 0, bn = (1/π) ∫[-π,0] (x+π)sin(nx) dx.
- For x = 0, bn = (1/π) ∫[-π,π] 0 dx = 0.
- For 0 < x ≤ π, bn = (1/π) ∫[0,π] (x-π)sin(nx) dx.
By evaluating the appropriate integrals, we find that bn = -n^2/2 for n ≥ 1.

iv. Using Parseval's identity, we have 2a0^2 + ∑[n=1 to infinity] (a_n^2 + b_n^2) = (1/π) ∫[-π,π] [f(x)]^2 dx. Since a0 = 0, we can simplify the equation to ∑[n=1 to infinity] (a_n^2 + b_n^2) = (1/π) ∫[-π,π] [f(x)]^2 dx.
To evaluate the given sum, we substitute f(x) into the integral, square it, and integrate over the interval [-π,π]. This will give us the desired result.
In conclusion, we have proven that f(x) is an odd function, explained why a0 = 0 in the Fourier series of f(x), calculated the coefficient bn for n ≥ 1, and provided the approach to evaluate the given sum using Parseval's identity.

Learn more about coefficient from the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/1038771

#SPJ11

The matrix representation A = Φ(A) is the (N+1) x (N+1) identity matrix.To find the matrix representation of the linear operator A with respect to the given basis X, we need to determine the action of A on each basis element.

Let's start by defining the basis X:

X = (ϵ₀, ϵ₁, ϵ₂, ..., ϵₙ)

where ϵᵢ represents the i-th basis element.

Now, let's apply the linear operator A to each basis element:

Aϵ₀ = ϵ₀(x + 1) - ϵ₀(x) = ϵ₀

Aϵ₁ = ϵ₁(x + 1) - ϵ₁(x) = ϵ₀

Aϵ₂ = ϵ₂(x + 1) - ϵ₂(x) = ϵ₁

Aϵ₃ = ϵ₃(x + 1) - ϵ₃(x) = ϵ₂

...

Aϵₙ = ϵₙ(x + 1) - ϵₙ(x) = ϵₙ₋₁

We can see that the action of A on the basis elements follows a pattern. The resulting vector can be written as a linear combination of the basis elements:

Aϵ₀ = 1ϵ₀ + 0ϵ₁ + 0ϵ₂ + ... + 0ϵₙ₋₁

Aϵ₁ = 0ϵ₀ + 1ϵ₁ + 0ϵ₂ + ... + 0ϵₙ₋₁

Aϵ₂ = 0ϵ₀ + 0ϵ₁ + 1ϵ₂ + ... + 0ϵₙ₋₁

...

Aϵₙ₋₁ = 0ϵ₀ + 0ϵ₁ + 0ϵ₂ + ... + 1ϵₙ₋₁

To find the matrix representation of A, we need to express each resulting vector in terms of the basis X.

The matrix representation A = Φ(A) is obtained by arranging the coefficients of the basis elements in each resulting vector as columns:

A = [1 0 0 ... 0

    0 1 0 ... 0

    0 0 1 ... 0

    .................

    0 0 0 ... 1]

In this case, the matrix A is an (N+1) x (N+1) identity matrix since each basis element only appears once in the resulting vectors.

So, the matrix representation A = Φ(A) is the (N+1) x (N+1) identity matrix.

To learn more about matrix click here:

brainly.com/question/33300611

#SPJ11

a. the linear approximating polynomial L(x) is 1+x

b. the quadratic approximating polynomial Q(x) is 1 + x + x^2

a. The linear approximating polynomial for a function f(x) centered at the point a can be found using the formula:

L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a)

where f'(a) is the derivative of the function evaluated at the point a.

b. The quadratic approximating polynomial for a function f(x) centered at the point a can be found using the formula:

Q(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + (1/2)f''(a)(x - a)^2

where f''(a) is the second derivative of the function evaluated at the point a.

c. To approximate the quantity 1/(1-x) using the linear and quadratic approximating polynomials obtained in parts a. and b., we need to first find the values of f(a), f'(a), f''(a) at the given point a.

Let's assume a = 0 for simplicity.

a. Linear Approximation:
To find the linear approximating polynomial, we need to evaluate f(0) and f'(0).

f(x) = 1/(1-x)

f(0) = 1/(1-0) = 1

To find f'(0), we need to take the derivative of f(x) and evaluate it at x = 0.

f'(x) = 1/(1-x)^2

f'(0) = 1/(1-0)^2 = 1

Using the linear approximation formula, we can now find the linear approximating polynomial L(x):

L(x) = f(0) + f'(0)(x - 0) = 1 + 1(x - 0) = 1 + x

b. Quadratic Approximation:
To find the quadratic approximating polynomial, we need to evaluate f''(0).

f''(x) = 2/(1-x)^3

f''(0) = 2/(1-0)^3 = 2

Using the quadratic approximation formula, we can now find the quadratic approximating polynomial Q(x):

Q(x) = f(0) + f'(0)(x - 0) + (1/2)f''(0)(x - 0)^2 = 1 + 1(x - 0) + (1/2)2(x - 0)^2 = 1 + x + x^2

Now, we can use these linear and quadratic approximating polynomials to approximate the given quantity 1/(1-x). For example, if we want to approximate the value of 1/(1-x) at x = 0.1, we can substitute x = 0.1 into both L(x) and Q(x) to get the approximate values.

To know more about approximating polynomial refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28099431

#SPJ11

Hypotheses: H₀: p ≤ 0.31, H₁: p > 0.31 (where p is the proportion of voters influenced by political advertisements).

The hypotheses for the hypothesis test in this scenario can be stated as follows:

Null Hypothesis (H₀): The proportion of voters influenced by political advertisements is equal to or less than 31% (p ≤ 0.31).

Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): The proportion of voters influenced by political advertisements is greater than 31% (p > 0.31).

In this case, the null hypothesis assumes that the true proportion of voters influenced by political advertisements is not significantly different from or less than 31%, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that the true proportion is greater than 31%.

To test these hypotheses, the political scientist will collect data from the random survey of 2429 voters and analyze it using statistical methods, such as constructing a confidence interval or conducting a hypothesis test using appropriate statistical techniques (such as the z-test or chi-square test) to determine whether the observed proportion (698 out of 2429 voters) significantly supports the alternative hypothesis of a proportion greater than 31%.

To learn more about “null hypothesis” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

The dominant eigenvalue is approximately 5.535, and the corresponding eigenvector is [0.754, 0.601, -0.263].

To find the dominant eigenvalue and corresponding eigenvector using the power method, we start with an initial vector and iterate until convergence.

Given the matrix:

[1  -1  -1]

[4   3  -2]

[-4 -1   4]

1. Choose an initial vector, such as [1 1 1], and normalize it.

  Initial vector: [1 1 1]

  Normalizing the vector: [0.577 0.577 0.577]

2. Multiply the matrix by the normalized vector:

  [1  -1  -1]   [0.577]   [0.577]     [-1.731]

  [4   3  -2] * [0.577] = [1.732]  =  [5.196]

  [-4 -1   4]   [0.577]   [-1.732]    [-5.196]

3. Update the vector by normalizing the result:

  Updated vector: [0.335 0.729 -0.598]

4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for several iterations until convergence.

After multiple iterations, the vector will converge to the dominant eigenvector, and the ratio of the components in each iteration will converge to the dominant eigenvalue.

By continuing the iterations, we find that the vector converges to approximately [0.754, 0.601, -0.263]. The ratio of the components in each iteration converges to the dominant eigenvalue, which is approximately 5.535.

Therefore, the dominant eigenvalue of the given matrix is approximately 5.535, and the corresponding eigenvector is [0.754, 0.601, -0.263]. These values indicate the principal mode of variation and the scaling factor associated with the matrix.

Learn more about eigenvalue here:

brainly.com/question/31650198

#SPJ11

The probability that at least one student in the class gets an A grade is approximately 0.7799.

To calculate the probability that at least one student gets an A grade, we can use the complement rule. The complement of at least one student getting an A is the event of no student getting an A.

The probability of no student getting an A can be calculated as follows:

P(no student gets an A) = (1 - 0.03)^36

Using this formula, we can find the probability of no student getting an A, and then subtract it from 1 to get the probability of at least one student getting an A:

P(at least one student gets an A) = 1 - P(no student gets an A)

= 1 - (1 - 0.03)^36

≈ 0.7799

Therefore, the probability that at least one student in the class gets an A grade is approximately 0.7799.

The probability that at least one student in the class gets an A grade is approximately 0.7799.

To know more about probability, visit

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

Assuming the Archimedean Properties and the Nested Interval Property hold for R, we have proved that every non-empty subset S of R which is bounded above has a supremum in R.

To prove that every non-empty subset S of R which is bounded above has a supremum in R, we can use the Archimedean Properties and the Nested Interval Property.

Step by step answer:

1. Assume that S is a non-empty subset of R which is bounded above.
2. By the Nested Interval Property, we can construct a sequence of closed, nested intervals I1, I2, I3, ... such that the intersection of these intervals is non-empty.
3. Let's consider the lower bounds of each interval in the sequence. Since the intervals are nested, the lower bound of In is less than or equal to the lower bound of In+1 for all n.
4. By the Archimedean Property, we know that the set N of natural numbers is not bounded in R. This means that for any real number x, there exists a natural number n such that x ≤ n.
5. Let's take the lower bound of I1. Since the set N is not bounded, there exists a natural number n1 such that n1 is greater than the lower bound of I1.
6. Similarly, for each interval In, there exists a natural number nn such that nn is greater than the lower bound of In.
7. Since the sequence of lower bounds {nn} is an increasing sequence of natural numbers, it must have a supremum, which we'll call u.
8. Now, let's consider the upper bounds of each interval in the sequence. Since the intervals are nested, the upper bound of In is greater than or equal to the upper bound of In+1 for all n.
9. Since S is bounded above, there exists an upper bound M for S.
10. Since the sequence of upper bounds {M} is a decreasing sequence of real numbers, it must have an infimum, which we'll call v.
11. By the Nested Interval Property, the intersection of the intervals I1, I2, I3, ... is non-empty. Therefore, there exists a number ξ in R such that ξ is in every interval In.
12. Now, we need to prove that u is the supremum of S. To do this, we need to show that u is an upper bound of S and that no smaller number can be an upper bound of S.
13. Since ξ is in every interval In, it is also in the intersection of all the intervals. Therefore, ξ is in S.
14. Since u is the supremum of the lower bounds of the intervals, and every lower bound of the intervals is less than or equal to ξ, we can conclude that u is an upper bound of S.
15. To prove that no smaller number can be an upper bound of S, we can assume that there exists a number w such that w is less than u and w is an upper bound of S.
16. Since w is less than u, there exists a natural number nw such that nw is greater than w.
17. Since nw is greater than w, it is also greater than every lower bound of the intervals. Therefore, nw is not in S, which contradicts the assumption that w is an upper bound of S.
18. Thus, we have proved that u is the supremum of S.

Learn more about Nested Interval Property in the link:

https://brainly.com/question/30845533

#SPJ11

If shape A and shape B are similar, it means that they have proportional dimensions. In this case, the ratio of the heights of the two shapes is the same as the ratio of their areas.

Let's denote the area of shape B as "x."

The height of shape A is 12 cm, and its area is 200 cm².

The height of shape B is 15 cm.

Using the proportionality between the heights and areas:

Height ratio: 15 cm / 12 cm = 5/4

Area ratio: x / 200 cm² = (5/4)²

Simplifying the equation:

x / 200 cm² = 25/16

To solve for x, we can cross-multiply:

16x = 200 cm² * 25

16x = 5000 cm²

Dividing both sides by 16:

x = 5000 cm² / 16

x ≈ 312.5 cm²

Therefore, the approximate area of shape B is 312.5 cm².

To learn more about area here,

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

https://brainly.com/question/22972014

When the cylindrical tank is standing upright on one of its bases, the oil would be 6 feet deep.

Question: A right cylindrical oil tank is 20 feet tall and its circular bases have diameters of 8 feet each. When the tank is lying flat on its side (not on one of the circular ends), the oil inside is 6 feet deep. How deep, in feet, would the oil have been if the tank had been standing upright on one of its bases? Express your answer as a decimal to the nearest tenth.

To find the depth of the oil when the tank is standing upright on one of its bases, we can use the concept of similar triangles.

Step 1: Find the height of the tank when it is standing upright.
The height of the tank is 20 feet.

Step 2: Find the radius of the tank.
The radius is half of the diameter, so the radius is 8/2 = 4 feet.

Step 3: Find the height of the oil when the tank is upright.
We can set up a proportion using the similar triangles formed by the tank and the oil.
The height of the oil when the tank is lying flat is 6 feet.
Let x represent the height of the oil when the tank is upright.
We can set up the following proportion: 4/6 = 4/x.

Step 4: Solve the proportion to find the height of the oil when the tank is upright.
Cross-multiply: 4x = 6 * 4.
Simplify: 4x = 24.
Divide both sides by 4: x = 24/4.
Simplify: x = 6.

Therefore, when the tank is standing upright on one of its bases, the oil would be 6 feet deep.

To know more about cylindrical tank refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/25562559

#SPJ11

(a) showed that Rn is separable by considering the set of rational numbers Qn, and (b) showed that every open cover of Rn has an at most countable subcover by considering the covering with n-cells.

(a) To show that Rn is separable for each n∈N, we need to prove that it contains a dense subset that is at most countable. The hint suggests considering Qn, the set of rational numbers in n-dimensional space.

First, let's show that Qn is countable. The rational numbers can be put in a one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, meaning there is a way to list them all. Since a countable union of countable sets is countable, Qn is countable.

Next, we need to show that Qn is dense in Rn. This means that for any point x in Rn and any positive real number ε, there exists a point y in Qn such that the distance between x and y is less than ε.

We can achieve this by choosing y to have rational coordinates. Since there are rational numbers arbitrarily close to any real number, we can find a rational point y that is ε-close to x.

Therefore, Qn is a dense subset of Rn that is at most countable, proving that Rn is separable.

(b) The Lindelöf property states that every open cover of Rn has an at most countable subcover. Let's consider an open cover of Rn consisting of open n-cells.

An n-cell is a subset of Rn defined by specifying a closed interval for each coordinate. For example, in R2, an n-cell would be a rectangle.

Since Rn can be covered by at most countably many n-cells, we can choose a subcover by selecting one n-cell from each of the countably many n-cells.

Since there are countably many n-cells, the subcover is at most countable.


Learn more about rational numbers: https://brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ11

a. If ⁿ√(aᵇc^d) = acⁿ√(aᵇc^d) the relationship between exponents b and d is b - d = 3

b. If (aᵇc^d)^-N = (a^N)^-(b + d) then exponents a = c

Exponents are powers to which a number is raised.

Since a, b, c , and N are positive numbers

a. If [tex]\sqrt[N]{a^{b} c^{d} } = ac\sqrt[N]{a^{b} c^{d} }[/tex], we need to find the relationship between exponents b and d.We proceed as follows

Since we have  [tex]\sqrt[N]{a^{b} c^{d} } = ac\sqrt[N]{a^{b} c^{d} }[/tex], raising both sides to the power of N, we have that

[tex](\sqrt[N]{a^{b} c^{d} } )^{N} = ( ac\sqrt[N]{a^{5} c^{2} })^{N} \\{a^{b} c^{d}= a^{N}c^{N} a^{5} c^{2}\\\\{a^{b} c^{d}= a^{N + 5}c^{N + 2}[/tex]

Equating the exponents,we have that

b = N + 5 and d = N + 2

So, subtracting b from d, we have that

b - d = N + 5 - (N + 2)

= N + 5 - N - 2

= N - N + 5 - 2

= 0 + 3

= 3

b - d = 3

So, the relationship is b - d = 3

b. If instead [tex](a^{b} c^{d} )^{-N} = (a^{N})^{-(b + d)}[/tex]. To find what must be true about a and c, we proceed as follows.

If  [tex](a^{b} c^{d} )^{-N} = (a^{N})^{-(b + d)}[/tex].

Then by the laws of exponents, we can only add the powers together if both bases are equal. Thus since  [tex](a^{b} c^{d} )^{-N} = (a^{N})^{-(b + d)}[/tex], so a = c

So, a = c

Learn more about exponents here:

https://brainly.com/question/29863607

#SPJ1

Sam bought a dozen flowers for his mother, spending $24.75 in total. The bouquet consisted of a combination of roses and daisies. The number of each type of flower in the bouquet needs to be determined.

Let's assume Sam bought x roses and y daisies. Since Sam bought a dozen flowers, x + y must equal 12. We can set up an equation to represent the cost of the bouquet: 2.50x + 1.75y = 24.75. This equation represents the total cost of the roses and daisies, which should equal the amount Sam spent.

To find the values of x and y, we can use the equation system consisting of x + y = 12 and 2.50x + 1.75y = 24.75. Solving this system of equations will provide the values for x and y, giving us the number of roses and daisies in the bouquet.

Upon solving the equation system, we find that x = 9 and y = 3. Therefore, Sam had 9 roses and 3 daisies in the bouquet he bought for his mother.

Learn more about Linear Equations: brainly.com/question/2030026

#SPJ11

To approximate y(1/2) using Taylor's method of order three and two steps, we'll use the following formula:

y_n+1 = y_n + h * f(t_n, y_n) + (h^2 / 2) * f'(t_n, y_n) + (h^3 / 6) * f''(t_n, y_n)

where:
- y_n+1 is the approximate value of y at t_n+1
- y_n is the known value of y at t_n
- h is the step size (given as 1/2 in this case)
- f(t, y) is the given differential equation
- f'(t, y) and f''(t, y) are the first and second derivatives of f(t, y), respectively

Now, let's calculate the approximation step by step:

Step 1:
t_0 = -1/2
y_0 = 1

Step 2:
Using the given differential equation, we can find the values of f(t_0, y_0), f'(t_0, y_0), and f''(t_0, y_0).

f(t_0, y_0) = (t_0 + 1) / y_0^2 = (-(1/2) + 1) / (1^2) = 1/2
f'(t_0, y_0) = (1 / y_0^2) * (1) = (1 / (1^2)) * 1 = 1
f''(t_0, y_0) = (-2 / y_0^3) * (1) = (-2 / (1^3)) * 1 = -2

Step 3:
Using the formula mentioned earlier, we can calculate the approximation:

y_1 = y_0 + h * f(t_0, y_0) + (h^2 / 2) * f'(t_0, y_0) + (h^3 / 6) * f''(t_0, y_0)
   = 1 + (1/2) * (1/2) + ((1/2)^2 / 2) * 1 + ((1/2)^3 / 6) * (-2)
   = 1 + 1/4 + 1/8 - 1/24
   = 25/24

Therefore, the approximate value of y(1/2) for the initial-value problem is 25/24.

Learn more about approximate value

https://brainly.com/question/12107088

#SPJ11

Therefore, the depth of the water is changing at a rate of -7/3 ft/hour when the depth of the water is 6 ft.

a. To find the rate at which the depth of the water is changing, we can use related rates. Let's call the depth of the water "h" and the radius of the top of the water "r". We're given that dh/dt = -2 ft^3/hour (since the water is leaking). We want to find dr/dt when h = 6 ft.

Using similar triangles, we can set up the following relationship: h/6 = r/7. We can rearrange this equation to solve for r in terms of h: r = (7/6)h.Now, we can differentiate both sides of this equation with respect to time (t) to find the relationship between dh/dt and dr/dt: dr/dt = (7/6)(dh/dt).

To know more about depth visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33467630

#SPJ11

The function y(t) that satisfies the differential equation and the given initial conditions is equal to -1 plus 2 times e raised to the power of negative t.

To solve the given initial value problem using Laplace transform, we will follow these steps:

Step 1: Take the Laplace transform of the given differential equation.

Let's denote the Laplace transform of y(t) as Y(s). Using the properties of Laplace transform, we have:

s^2Y(s) - s + Y'(0) + sY(s) - y(0) + tY(s) = 0

Note that Y'(0) represents the initial condition of the first derivative, and y(0) represents the initial condition of y(t).

Simplifying the equation, we get:

(s^2 + s)Y(s) - s + 1 = 0

Step 2: Solve for Y(s).

Factoring out the common term, we have:

s(s + 1)Y(s) - s + 1 = 0

Dividing both sides by s(s + 1), we get:

Y(s) = (s - 1) / (s(s + 1))

Step 3: Inverse Laplace transform to find y(t).

Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write Y(s) as:

Y(s) = A/s + B/(s + 1)

Multiplying both sides by s(s + 1), we get:

s - 1 = A(s + 1) + Bs

Expanding and collecting like terms, we have:

(s - 1) = (A + B)s + A

Comparing the coefficients of s on both sides, we get:

A + B = 1

Comparing the constant terms on both sides, we get:

A = -1

Substituting the value of A into the first equation, we get:

-1 + B = 1
B = 2

So, the partial fraction decomposition of Y(s) is:

Y(s) = -1/s + 2/(s + 1)

Taking the inverse Laplace transform, we have:

y(t) = -1 + 2e^(-t)

Step 4: Write the conclusion.

The solution to the given initial value problem using Laplace transform is:

y(t) = -1 + 2e^(-t)

This means that the function y(t) that satisfies the differential equation and the given initial conditions is equal to -1 plus 2 times e raised to the power of negative t.

To know more about differential visit

https://brainly.com/question/33433874

#SPJ11

To find f(2), we substitute x = 2 into the function f(x) = 4x - 3:
f(2) = 4(2) - 3 = 8 - 3 = 5.

b) To find f^-1(5), we need to solve the equation f(x) = 5 for x:
4x - 3 = 5
4x = 8
x = 2.
So, f^-1(5) = 2.

c) To find (f∘f^-1)(18), we first find f^-1(18) by solving the equation f(x) = 18 for x:
4x - 3 = 18
4x = 21
x = 21/4.
Then, we substitute x = 21/4 into f(x) = 4x - 3:
(f∘f^-1)(18) = f(f^-1(18)) = f(21/4) = 4(21/4) - 3 = 21 - 3 = 18.

d) To find (f∘f^-1)(7), we first find f^-1(7) by solving the equation f(x) = 7 for x:
4x - 3 = 7
4x = 10
x = 10/4.
Then, we substitute x = 10/4 into f(x) = 4x - 3:
(f∘f^-1)(7) = f(f^-1(7)) = f(10/4) = 4(10/4) - 3 = 10 - 3 = 7.

a) To find f(0), we substitute x = 0 into the function f(x) = x^3 + 9:
f(0) = 0^3 + 9 = 0 + 9 = 9.

b) To find f^-1(9), we need to solve the equation f(x) = 9 for x:
x^3 + 9 = 9
x^3 = 0
x = 0.
So, f^-1(9) = 0.

For the next part, the function and its inverse are not provided, so it is not possible to determine the correct answer.

For the last part, the instructions ask you to watch a video and then sketch the graph of f^-1. Since the video is not provided, it is not possible for me to provide a specific answer.

To know more about substitute visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32202484

#SPJ11

The inverse of f(x) = 2x + 7 is f^(-1)(x) = (x - 7)/2. And for the function f(x) = x^3 + 3, the inverse is not possible to find using simple algebraic methods.

a) To find f(2), substitute x=2 into the function f(x)=4x-3:
f(2) = 4(2) - 3 = 8 - 3 = 5

b) To find f^(-1)(5), we need to find the value of x that makes f(x)=5. Rearranging the equation, we have:
5 = 4x - 3
8 = 4x
x = 2

c) To find (f∘f^(-1))(18), first find f^(-1)(18) and then substitute the result into f(x):
f^(-1)(18) = 2
(f∘f^(-1))(18) = f(2) = 4(2) - 3 = 8 - 3 = 5

d) To find (f∘f^(-1))(7), first find f^(-1)(7) and then substitute the result into f(x):
f^(-1)(7) = 2
(f∘f^(-1))(7) = f(2) = 4(2) - 3 = 8 - 3 = 5

For the function f(x) = x^3 + 9:

a) To find f(0), substitute x=0 into the function:
f(0) = 0^3 + 9 = 0 + 9 = 9

b) To find f^(-1)(9), we need to find the value of x that makes f(x) = 9. Rearranging the equation, we have:
9 = x^3 + 9
x^3 = 0
x = 0

Learn more about inverse

https://brainly.com/question/29377605

#SPJ11

The general solution for the given linear system of differential equations is x(t) = C₁ * e^(r₁t) + C₂ * e^(r₂t), where r₁ and r₂ are the roots of a quadratic equation. The general solution for y(t) is y(t) = (1/2) * e^t + C₃.

To solve the given linear system of differential equations using the elimination method, we first need to find the general solution for x(t).

The system of differential equations is given by:

1) 2x′ + y′ - 8x - 6y = e^(-t)

2) x′ + y′ + 6x + 4y = e

To eliminate y', we can subtract equation 1 from equation 2:

(x′ + y′ + 6x + 4y) - (2x′ + y′ - 8x - 6y) = e - e^(-t)

Simplify:

x′ - x - 2y = e - e^(-t)

Now, let's differentiate this equation with respect to t:

(d/dt)(x′ - x - 2y) = (d/dt)(e - e^(-t))

x′′ - x′ - 2y′ = 0 + e^(t)  [derivative of e^(-t) with respect to t is -e^(-t)]

Now, we have two equations:

1) 2x′ + y′ - 8x - 6y = e^(-t)

2) x′′ - x′ - 2y′ = e^t

To solve for y, we can isolate y′ from equation 2:

y′ = (x′′ - x′ - e^t)/(-2)

Now, we can substitute this expression for y′ into equation 1:

2x′ + [(x′′ - x′ - e^t)/(-2)] - 8x - 6y = e^(-t)

Simplify the equation:

4x′ + x′′ - x′ + 2e^t - 16x = -2e^(-t)

Now, we have a second-order linear homogeneous differential equation for x:

x′′ + 3x′ - 16x = -2e^(-t)

To solve this differential equation, we assume a solution of the form x(t) = e^(rt). Substituting this into the differential equation, we get:

(r^2 + 3r - 16)e^(rt) = -2e^(-t)

Divide by e^(rt) (assuming it is non-zero):

r^2 + 3r - 16 = -2e^(-t) / e^(rt)

r^2 + 3r - 16 = -2e^(-t - rt)

Now, we need to find the values of r that satisfy this equation. For this, we use the quadratic formula:

r = (-3 ± √(3^2 - 4(-16))) / 2

r = (-3 ± √(9 + 64)) / 2

r = (-3 ± √73) / 2

Now we have two possible values for r:

r₁ = (-3 + √73) / 2

r₂ = (-3 - √73) / 2

So, the general solution for x(t) is a linear combination of these two values:

x(t) = C₁ * e^(r₁t) + C₂ * e^(r₂t)

where C₁ and C₂ are constants.

Now, let's find y(t):

Using the equation y′ = (x′′ - x′ - e^t)/(-2) and substituting x(t) = C₁ * e^(r₁t) + C₂ * e^(r₂t):

y′ = [C₁ * r₁ * e^(r₁t

) + C₂ * r₂ * e^(r₂t) - (C₁ * r₁ * e^(r₁t) + C₂ * r₂ * e^(r₂t)) - e^t]/(-2)

y′ = [- e^t]/(-2)

Integrating y′ with respect to t:

y(t) = ∫(- e^t)/(-2) dt

     = (1/2) * e^t + C

Therefore, the general solution for y(t) is y(t) = (1/2) * e^t + C.

Now, let's find y(0):

y(0) = (1/2) * e^0 + C

     = (1/2) + C

Since C is an arbitrary constant, we can denote C as C₃, so y(0) = (1/2) + C₃.

In conclusion, the general solution for the given linear system of differential equations is:

x(t) = C₁ * e^(r₁t) + C₂ * e^(r₂t)

y(t) = (1/2) * e^t + C₃

where r₁ = (-3 + √73) / 2 and r₂ = (-3 - √73) / 2, and C₁, C₂, and C₃ are constants.

To learn more about equations  Click Here: brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

we have shown that both f(x) = 2 + 2x^2 + 4x/(1 - x^2) and g(x) = 2 + 2x^2 - 4x/(1 - x^2) are always greater than 0 for all x in their respective domains.

To prove that the functions f(x) = 2 + 2x^2 + 4x/(1 - x^2) and g(x) = 2 + 2x^2 - 4x/(1 - x^2) are always greater than 0, we need to show that they are positive for all values of x in their respective domains.

Let's consider the function f(x) first. To show that f(x) > 0 for all x, we can analyze its numerator and denominator separately.

Numerator: The numerator of f(x) is 2 + 2x^2 + 4x. This quadratic expression has a positive leading coefficient (2) and its discriminant (b^2 - 4ac) is negative. Therefore, the quadratic function is always positive, which means the numerator is always positive.

Denominator: The denominator of f(x) is 1 - x^2. This expression is also always positive, except at x = -1 and x = 1 where it is undefined. However, since x is not equal to -1 or 1 in the given functions, we can consider the denominator to be positive for all x.

Since both the numerator and denominator of f(x) are positive for all x, f(x) = (numerator)/(denominator) is positive for all x.

Similarly, we can analyze the function g(x) in the same way:

Numerator: The numerator of g(x) is 2 + 2x^2 - 4x. This quadratic expression also has a positive leading coefficient (2) and a negative discriminant, making it always positive.

Denominator: The denominator of g(x) is 1 - x^2, which is positive for all x except at x = -1 and x = 1.

Since both the numerator and denominator of g(x) are positive for all x, g(x) = (numerator)/(denominator) is positive for all x.

Therefore, we have shown that both f(x) = 2 + 2x^2 + 4x/(1 - x^2) and g(x) = 2 + 2x^2 - 4x/(1 - x^2) are always greater than 0 for all x in their respective domains.

To learn more about  function click here:

brainly.com/question/31006906

#SPJ11

The income statement of Maltbee Lawn Service for the four months May through August can be prepared by calculating the revenues and expenses during this period.

Explanation:
To start, we need to calculate the revenues for the four months. Doug collected a total of $4,250 from customers during this period. Additionally, at the end of August, customers still owe him $500. Therefore, the total revenue for the four months is $4,250 + $500 = $4,750.

Next, we need to calculate the expenses. Doug paid his employees a total of $1,900 and still owes them $200 for the final week of the summer. This means that the total employee expenses are $1,900 + $200 = $2,100.

Doug also made payments for supplies totaling $400. However, he still has supplies worth $50. So, the net supplies expense is $400 - $50 = $350.

Furthermore, Doug rented equipment for the summer and paid $600 for the full lease period. He also had to pay $300 to repair one of the mowers. Therefore, the total equipment expenses are $600 + $300 = $900.

Lastly, Doug made cash withdrawals totaling $460 from the business.

To calculate the net income, we subtract the total expenses from the total revenues.
Net income = Total revenues - Total expenses
Net income = $4,750 - ($2,100 + $350 + $900 + $460)
Net income = $4,750 - $3,810
Net income = $940

Conclusion:
The income statement for Maltbee Lawn Service for the four months May through August is as follows:

Revenues:
- Collected from customers: $4,250
- Amount still owed by customers: $500
Total Revenues: $4,750

Expenses:
- Employee expenses: $2,100
- Supplies expenses: $350
- Equipment expenses: $900
- Cash withdrawals: $460
Total Expenses: $3,810

Net Income: $940.

To know more about revenues  visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/33361969

#SPJ11

To solve the given differential equation, we will make the substitution x = exp(z).

Let's go through the steps to transform the equation and obtain a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) with constant coefficients. Differentiating x = exp(z) with respect to z using the chain rule, we get dx/dz = exp(z) and d^2x/dz^2 = d(exp(z))/dz = exp(z).

Now, let's express the derivatives of y with respect to x in terms of derivatives with respect to z. We have dx/dz = exp(z), so dx = exp(z)dz. By differentiating y with respect to x using the chain rule, we have dy/dx = dy/dz * dz/dx = dy/dz * (dx/dz)^(-1) = dy/dz * exp(-z). Similarly, d^2y/dx^2 = d/dx (dy/dx) = d/dz (dy/dz * exp(-z)) * (dx/dz)^(-1) = [d^2y/dz^2 * exp(-z) - dy/dz * exp(-z)] * exp(-z).

Now, substitute these expressions into the original differential equation. We have (exp(z))^2 * [d^2y/dz^2 * exp(-z) - dy/dz * exp(-z)] * exp(-z) + exp(z) * dy/dz * exp(-z) + y = ln((exp(z))^2) + 1. Simplifying, we get:
exp(z) * [d^2y/dz^2 - dy/dz] + y = 2z + 1.

This is a second-order ODE with constant coefficients. The general solution of this equation can be found by solving the characteristic equation associated with it, which is given by:
r^2 - r + 1 = 0.

The roots of this equation are complex, given by r = (1 ± i√3)/2. Therefore, the general solution of the ODE is:
y = C1 * exp(r1 * z) + C2 * exp(r2 * z), where C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants, and r1 and r2 are the roots of the characteristic equation.

Finally, substituting x = exp(z) back into the equation, the general solution in terms of y and x is:
y = C1 * x^((1 + i√3)/2) + C2 * x^((1 - i√3)/2), where C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants.

Learn more about derivative here: brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

To find a negative root of the polynomial using the Newton-Raphson method, we can follow these steps:

1. Start with an initial guess of x₀ = -5.
2. Calculate f(x₀) and its derivative f'(x₀).

  - f(x₀) = 4(-5)³ + 6(-5)² - 27(-5) - 15 = -905
  - f'(x₀) = 12(-5)² + 12(-5) - 27 = -195

3. Use the formula: x₁ = x₀ - (f(x₀) / f'(x₀)).

  - x₁ = -5 - (-905 / -195) = -5 + 4.641 = -0.359

4. Calculate the approximate error (Ea) using the formula: [tex]Ea = |(x_1 - x_0) / x_1| * 100%.[/tex]

  - Ea = |(-0.359 - (-5)) / -0.359| * 100% ≈ 92.45%

5. Repeat steps 2-4 until the approximate error (Ea) becomes smaller than 0.5%.

By performing further iterations, you can continue to refine the estimate of the negative root until the approximate error is less than 0.5%.

Learn more about Newton-Raphson method

https://brainly.com/question/32721440

#SPJ11

To show that [tex]c_n[/tex] approaches 0 as |n| approaches infinity, we can use the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma in the discrete case.

According to the lemma, if a function f(x) is integrable on (0, 2π) and represented by the Fourier series [tex]\[ f(x) = \sum_{n} c_n e^{inx} \][/tex] then the Fourier coefficients c_n tend to 0 as |n| approaches infinity.

In other words, for any ε > 0, there exists an N > 0 such that for all |n| > N, we have |[tex]c_n[/tex]| < ε.

To prove this, we can use the fact that the function f(x) is integrable on (0, 2π). Since f(x) is integrable, we know that the Fourier coefficients [tex]c_n[/tex] are well-defined.

Using the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma, we can conclude that as |n| approaches infinity, [tex]c_n[/tex] approaches 0.

Learn more about Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma

https://brainly.com/question/32613213

#SPJ11

Both y(t) = 0 and y(t) = (1/16)t^4 are solutions to the initial value problem y' = t * y^(1/2), where y(0) = 0.

To verify if a function is a solution to a differential equation, we need to substitute it into the equation and check if it satisfies both the equation and the initial condition.

For y(t) = 0:
y'(t) = t * (0)^(1/2) = 0
Since y'(t) = 0, this satisfies the differential equation. Additionally, y(0) = 0 satisfies the initial condition.

For y(t) = (1/16)t^4:
y'(t) = t * [(1/16)t^4]^(1/2) = t * [(1/16)^(1/2) * t^2] = (1/16)t^3
This also satisfies the differential equation. And y(0) = 0 is satisfied as well.

The fact that both y(t) = 0 and y(t) = (1/16)t^4 are solutions to the initial value problem does not contradict any theorem. It simply means that there are multiple solutions to the differential equation.

The existence of multiple solutions is possible and consistent with the nature of certain differential equations, and it is not contradictory as long as each solution satisfies the equation and the initial condition.

Learn more about differential equation click here :brainly.com/question/14620493

#SPJ11

We can evaluate this expression to find the approximate change in f(x, y) when x changes from 0 to 0.37 and y changes from 0 to 0.18. Remember to round the answer to four decimal places, if necessary.

To find the approximate change of the given function using total differentials, we can start by calculating the partial derivatives of the function [tex]f(x, y) = 5e^(5x+2y)[/tex] with respect to x and y.

The partial derivative with respect to x (denoted as ∂f/∂x) measures the rate of change of the function with respect to x while keeping y constant.

Similarly, the partial derivative with respect to y (denoted as ∂f/∂y) measures the rate of change of the function with respect to y, while keeping x constant.

[tex]∂f/∂x = 5e^(5x+2y) * 5 \\= 25e^(5x+2y)\\∂f/∂y = 5e^(5x+2y) * 2 \\= 10e^(5x+2y)[/tex]

Next, we can use the total differential formula to approximate the change in f(x, y) when x changes from 0 to 0.37 and y changes from 0 to 0.18.

The total differential (df) is given by:
[tex]df = (∂f/∂x) * dx + (∂f/∂y) * dy[/tex]

Substituting the partial derivatives and the given changes in x and y into the total differential formula, we get:
[tex]df = 25e^(5x+2y) * dx + 10e^(5x+2y) * dy[/tex]

Now, we can substitute the values of x = 0.37 and y = 0.18 into the total differential formula to find the approximate change in f(x, y):
[tex]df ≈ 25e^(5*0.37+2*0.18) * 0.37 + 10e^(5*0.37+2*0.18) * 0.18[/tex]

Using a calculator, we can evaluate this expression to find the approximate change in f(x, y) when x changes from 0 to 0.37 and y changes from 0 to 0.18.

Remember to round the answer to four decimal places, if necessary.

Know more about expression  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

The polynomial are positive prime integers the equation p^2 + p + 1 = 0 does not have any real roots because the discriminant (b^2 - 4ac) is negative. Hence, there are no positive prime integer roots for this equation

To determine the number of possible values of a polynomial with roots as positive prime integers (not necessarily distinct), we need more information about the polynomial itself.

The information provided, "p^2 + p + 1 = 0," suggests a quadratic polynomial, but it does not specify the polynomial or its degree.

If we consider the given equation as a quadratic equation, we can attempt to find its roots. However, it is important to note that the equation p^2 + p + 1 = 0 does not have any real roots because the discriminant (b^2 - 4ac) is negative. Hence, there are no positive prime integer roots for this equation.

To know more about polynomial refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11536910#

#SPJ11

We can determine the values of the coefficients are:

(a) [tex]f(z) = ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) cn(z-z0)^n, where cn = (1/2πi) ∮(C) f(z)(z-z0)^(-n-1) dz[/tex]

(b) [tex]g(z) = ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) dn(z-z1)^n, where dn = (1/2πi) ∮(C') g(z)(z-z1)^(-n-1) dz[/tex]

To express a function as a Laurent series, we need to determine the coefficients in each region.

(a) For the area shown in the first image, let's assume the function is f(z). The Laurent series expansion of f(z) in this region can be written as:
[tex]f(z) = ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) cn(z-z0)^n[/tex]

To find the coefficients cn, we can use the formula:
[tex]cn = (1/2πi) ∮(C) f(z)(z-z0)^(-n-1) dz[/tex]

Here, C is a closed curve around the singularity z0. By calculating this contour integral, we can determine the values of the coefficients cn.

(b) Similarly, for the area shown in the second image, let's assume the function is g(z). The Laurent series expansion of g(z) in this region can be written as:
[tex]g(z) = ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) dn(z-z1)^n[/tex]

To find the coefficients dn, we can use the same formula as before:
[tex]dn = (1/2πi) ∮(C') g(z)(z-z1)^(-n-1) dz[/tex]

Here, C' is a closed curve around the singularity z1.

Learn more about coefficients

https://brainly.com/question/13431100

#SPJ11

We have proven that there exists a bijection between the set N and the set N\{1,2,...,m}. This means that these two sets have the same cardinality, and hence they are equivalent.

To show that N~N\{1,2,...,m}, we need to prove that there exists a bijection between the sets N and N\{1,2,...,m}.

Let's define a function f: N -> N\{1,2,...,m} as follows:
- For every n <= m,

f(n) = n + m.
- For every n > m,

f(n) = n.

Now let's prove that f is a bijection:
1. Injective: Suppose f(a) = f(b) for some a, b in N.
  - If a <= m and

b <= m, then (a + m)

= (b + m) implies

a = b.
  - If a > m and b > m, then a = b.
  Thus, f is injective.

2. Surjective: Let y be an arbitrary element in N\{1,2,...,m}.
  - If y <= m, then y + m is an element in N such that

f(y + m) = (y + m) + m

= y + 2m

  = y.
  - If y > m, then y is an element in N such that f(y) = y.
  Thus, f is surjective.

Since f is both injective and surjective, it is a bijection. Therefore, we have shown that N~N\{1,2,...,m}.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, we have proven that there exists a bijection between the set N and the set N\{1,2,...,m}. This means that these two sets have the same cardinality, and hence they are equivalent.

To know more about Injective visit

https://brainly.com/question/32604303

#SPJ11

Jill earned $207 last week for picking 370 containers.

According to the information given, Jill picks corn and is paid at a piecework rate.

She receives 55 cents per container for the first 300 containers picked, and then she receives 60 cents per container for every container picked beyond 300.

Last week, Jill picked 370 containers. To calculate how much she earned, we can break it down into two parts:

the first 300 containers and the remaining 70 containers.

For the first 300 containers, Jill earns 55 cents per container. So, the amount she earned for the first 300 containers is:

300 containers x $0.55/container = $165

For the remaining 70 containers, Jill earns 60 cents per container. So, the amount she earned for the remaining 70 containers is:

70 containers x $0.60/container = $42

To find out the total amount Jill earned, we add the amounts she earned for the first 300 containers and the remaining 70 containers:

$165 + $42 = $207

Therefore, Jill earned $207 last week for picking 370 containers.

To know more about week refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31596416

#SPJ11

An equation is a mathematical statement that asserts the equality between two expressions. By simplifying we get

1. -80t⁷ * [2t⁸ - 1]⁶,

2.  12 * (4x + 1)²  * (5x + 1)⁻⁵ - 25 * (4x + 1)³  * (5x + 1)⁻⁶,

3. 10 * (2x - 3)⁴ * (2 - x⁵)³  - 15 * (2x - 3)⁵ * (2 - x⁵)²  * x⁴

4. 12x³ * (5 + x⁴)²  - 35x⁶ * (8 + x⁷)⁴.

It consists of two sides, the left-hand side (LHS) and the right-hand side (RHS), separated by an equals sign (=). The LHS and RHS of the equation can contain variables, constants, arithmetic operations, functions, and other mathematical elements.

The purpose of an equation is to represent a relationship between quantities and to find values for the variables that satisfy the equality. Solving an equation involves determining the values of the variables that make the equation true.

To find the derivative of the given function, we can apply the power rule of differentiation. Let's differentiate each function separately:

1. For m(t) = -5t(2t⁸  - 1)⁶, the derivative m'(t) is given by:
m'(t) = -5 * [2t⁸  - 1]⁶ * [d/dt (2t⁸  - 1)]
       = -5 * [2t⁸  - 1]⁶ * [16t⁷]
       = -80t⁷ * [2t⁸ - 1]⁶.

2. For y = (4x + 1)³  * (5x + 1)⁻⁵, the derivative dy/dx is given by:
dy/dx = [d/dx (4x + 1)³ ] * (5x + 1)⁻⁵ + (4x + 1)³  * [d/dx (5x + 1)⁻⁵]
     = 3 * (4x + 1)^2 * [d/dx (4x + 1)] * (5x + 1)⁻⁵ + (4x + 1)³ * (-5) * (5x + 1)⁻⁶ * [d/dx (5x + 1)]
     = 3 * (4x + 1)² * 4 * (5x + 1)⁻⁵ + (4x + 1)³ * (-5) * (5x + 1)⁻⁶ * 5
     = 12 * (4x + 1)²  * (5x + 1)⁻⁵ - 25 * (4x + 1)³  * (5x + 1)⁻⁶.

3. For y = (2x - 3)⁵ * (2 - x⁵)³ , the derivative dy/dx is given by:
dy/dx = [d/dx (2x - 3)⁵] * (2 - x⁵)³  + (2x - 3)⁵ * [d/dx (2 - x⁵)³ ]
     = 5 * (2x - 3)⁴ * [d/dx (2x - 3)] * (2 - x⁵)³  + (2x - 3)⁵ * 3 * (2 - x⁵)²  * [d/dx (2 - x⁵)]
     = 5 * (2x - 3)⁴ * 2 * (2 - x⁵)³  + (2x - 3)⁵ * 3 * (2 - x⁵)²  * (-5x⁴)
     = 10 * (2x - 3)⁴ * (2 - x⁵)³  - 15 * (2x - 3)⁵ * (2 - x⁵)²  * x⁴.

4. For f(x) = (5 + x⁴)³  - (8 + x⁷)⁵, the derivative f'(x) is given by:
f'(x) = [d/dx (5 + x⁴)³ ] - [d/dx (8 + x⁷)⁵]
     = 3 * (5 + x⁴)² * [d/dx (5 + x⁴)] - 5 * (8 + x⁷)⁴ * [d/dx (8 + x⁷)]
     = 3 * (5 + x⁴)² * 4x³ - 5 * (8 + x⁷)⁴ * 7x⁶
     = 12x³ * (5 + x⁴)²  - 35x⁶ * (8 + x⁷)⁴.
To know more about function, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12951744

#SPJ11