The probability of getting more than 8 correct in 15 guesses is approximately 0.057.
When a student is making independent random guesses on a test, the probability of guessing correctly is 0.5 for each question. In this case, we need to find the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers out of 15 guesses.
To solve this problem, we can use the binomial probability formula. The formula for the probability of getting exactly k successes in n independent Bernoulli trials, each with probability p of success, is given by:
P(X = k) = C(n, k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * (1 - p)[tex]^(^n^ -^ k^)[/tex]
Where:
P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes,
C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient, equal to n! / (k! * (n - k)!),
p is the probability of success in a single trial (0.5 in this case),
n is the total number of trials (15 guesses in this case).
To find the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers, we need to calculate the probabilities of getting 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 correct answers, and then sum them up:
P(X > 8) = P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11) + P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) + P(X = 14) + P(X = 15)
After performing the calculations, we find that the probability of getting more than 8 correct answers in 15 guesses is approximately 0.057.
Learn more about probability
brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
luis has saved $15. he doubles the amount he saves each week. does this represent an exponential function? choose the correct word in each drop-down menu. this choose... represent an exponential function, because his savings increase by a constant choose... .
The given scenario represents an exponential function because Luis doubles the amount he saves each week, which results in a constant multiplicative factor.
An exponential function is a mathematical function in which the independent variable appears as an exponent.
In this case, Luis doubles the amount he saves each week, which means his savings increase by a constant multiplicative factor of 2. Starting with $15, his savings would be $30 after one week, $60 after two weeks, $120 after three weeks, and so on.
This exponential growth is characterized by a consistent doubling of the savings amount each week, indicating an exponential function.
To learn more about exponential click here:
brainly.com/question/29160729
#SPJ11
If a researcher wanted to compare kangaroos and wallabies on
average weight, what kind of t-test would be appropriate and
why?
To compare the average weight of kangaroos and wallabies, an independent samples t-test would be appropriate because the researcher is comparing two separate groups (kangaroos and wallabies) and wants to determine if there is a significant difference between their average weights.
An independent samples t-test is used when comparing the means of two distinct groups to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between them. In this case, the researcher wants to compare the average weight of kangaroos and wallabies, which are two separate groups. The independent samples t-test would allow the researcher to assess whether the difference in average weight between kangaroos and wallabies is likely due to chance or if it represents a meaningful distinction.
Learn more about hypothesis testing here: brainly.com/question/17099835
#SPJ11
Given eigenvalue A of a matrix A, determine the geometric and algebraic multiplicity of the eigenvalue. [3 1 1] A1 3 1, A=2 1 1 3
The eigenvalue A of the matrix A has a geometric multiplicity of 1 and an algebraic multiplicity of 2.
To determine the geometric and algebraic multiplicities of an eigenvalue, we need to consider the matrix A and its corresponding eigenvalues.
In this case, the given matrix A is:
A = [3 1 1]
[2 1 1]
[3 1 3]
To find the eigenvalues of A, we need to solve the characteristic equation, which is obtained by setting the determinant of (A - λI) equal to zero, where λ is the eigenvalue and I is the identity matrix.
The characteristic equation for matrix A is:
det(A - λI) = 0
Expanding this equation, we get:
(3-λ)((1-λ)(3-λ)-(1)(1)) - (1)((2)(3-λ)-(1)(3)) + (1)((2)(1)-(1)(3)) = 0
Simplifying and solving this equation, we find the eigenvalues:
(λ-1)(λ-4)(λ-2) = 0
From this equation, we can see that the eigenvalues are λ = 1, λ = 4, and λ = 2.
Now, to determine the geometric multiplicity of an eigenvalue, we need to find the number of linearly independent eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue. In this case, the eigenvalue A has a geometric multiplicity of 1, which means there is only one linearly independent eigenvector associated with it.
On the other hand, the algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue is the number of times the eigenvalue appears as a root of the characteristic equation. In this case, the eigenvalue A has an algebraic multiplicity of 2, indicating that it is a repeated root of the characteristic equation.
Therefore, the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue A is 1, and the algebraic multiplicity is 2.
To learn more about algebraic multiplicity click here: brainly.com/question/31116620
#SPJ11
Investors in the stock market are interested in estimating the true proportion of stocks that go up each week. They collect a random sample of 45 stocks and record if they went up that week. They find out that 24 of them went up . Which confidence interval would they then use?
Confidence interval for the true proportion , that is a one proportion confidence interval
Given,
We have been given that in a random sample of 45 stocks , it is found that 24 of them went up.
The investors are interested in estimating the true proportion of stocks that go up each week. Hence we shall calculate the confidence interval for the true proportion, a one proportion confidence interval.
Hence the investors would then use the confidence interval for the true proportion, a one proportion confidence interval for the true proportion of stocks that go up each week.
Know more about confidence interval,
https://brainly.com/question/32546207
#SPJ4
Rewrite the function in simplest form, including the appropriate domain. 3x²+x-2 f(x)=- 3x-2 O f(x)=x+1, x# f(x)=x-1,x# 2/ f(x)=x²-1,X #3 f(x)=2x, x+3/ 2
The function f(x) = 3x² + x - 2 can be rewritten in simplest form as f(x) = x² + 4x - 3, with the appropriate domain being all real numbers.
1. Start with the given function f(x) = 3x² + x - 2.
2. Simplify the expression by combining like terms. In this case, we have 3x² and x, which can be combined to form x² + 4x.
3. Rewrite the function as f(x) = x² + 4x - 2.
4. Further simplify the expression by adjusting the constant term. In this case, we have -2, which can be rewritten as -3.
5. The final simplified form of the function is f(x) = x² + 4x - 3.
6. Determine the appropriate domain for the function. In this case, the function is a polynomial, which means it is defined for all real numbers. Therefore, the domain of the function is (-∞, +∞) or all real numbers.
Learn more about polynomial: brainly.com/question/11536910
#SPJ11
Events A and B are such that P(A) = 0.40 and P(A U B) = 0.85. Given that A and B are independent and non-mutually exclusive, determine P(B).
a. 0.75
b. 0.45
c. 0.34
d. 0.60
e. 0.55
The probability of event B is 0.75.
we have the formula for the probability of the union of two independent events:
P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A) * P(B)
We are given that P(A) = 0.40 and P(A U B) = 0.85, so we can substitute these values into the formula:
0.85 = 0.40 + P(B) - 0.40 * P(B)
Simplifying the equation:
0.85 = 0.40 + P(B) - 0.40P(B)
0.85 = 0.40 + 0.60P(B)
0.85 - 0.40 = 0.60P(B)
0.45 = 0.60P(B)
P(B) = 0.45 / 0.60
P(B) = 0.75
Therefore, the probability of event B is 0.75.
Learn more about the probability:
brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
Let y tan(4x + 6). Find the differential dy when = 3 and da = 0.1 0.08844 Find the differential dy when z = 3 and de = 0.2 0.88445 Question Help: Video Message instructor Submit Question Jump to Answer 01 Delow X X Let y = 4x². Find the change in y, Ay when z = 1 and Ax = Find the differential dy when x = 1 and da = 0.4 Question Help: Video Message instructor Submit Question Jump to Answer 0.4 0.2448 X Let y = 4√/E. Find the change in y, Ay when . = 3 and Az = 0.4 Find the differential dy when z = 3 and dz= 0.4 Question Help: Message instructor Submit Question Jump to Answer Textbook Videos [+] Let y = 3x² + 5x + 4. If Az = 0.1 at x = 2, use linear approximation to estimate Ay Ay≈
The estimated value of Ay is 1.7.
Given equation:y = tan(4x + 6)At x = 3 and dx = 0.1
We have to find dy.Using the formula for differential:dy = y′dx
Here, y′ denotes the derivative of y with respect to x.To find y′, differentiate the given equation, we get:y′ = sec²(4x + 6)
On substituting the values of x and dx in the above expressions, we get:dy = y′dx= sec²(4x + 6)dxPutting x = 3 and dx = 0.1, we get:dy = sec²(4x + 6)dx= sec²(4 × 3 + 6) × 0.1= sec²(18) × 0.1= 0.08844 (approx)
Thus, the differential dy is 0.08844 when x = 3 and dx = 0.1.Given equation:y = 4x²At x = 1 and dx = 0.4
We have to find the change in y, Ay.Using the formula for differential:dy = y′dx
Here, y′ denotes the derivative of y with respect to x.To find y′, differentiate the given equation, we get:y′ = 8xOn substituting the values of x and dx in the above expressions, we get:dy = y′dx= 8x × dxPutting x = 1 and dx = 0.4, we get:dy = 8x × dx= 8 × 1 × 0.4= 3.2Thus, the change in y, Ay = dy = 3.2 when x = 1 and dx = 0.4.Given equation:y = 4√xAt x = 3 and dx = 0.4
We have to find the differential dy.Using the formula for differential:dy = y′dx
Here, y′ denotes the derivative of y with respect to x.To find y′, differentiate the given equation, we get:y′ = 2/√x
On substituting the values of x and dx in the above expressions, we get:dy = y′dx= 2/√x × dxPutting x = 3 and dx = 0.4, we get:dy = 2/√x × dx= 2/√3 × 0.4= 0.88445 (approx)Thus, the differential dy is 0.88445 when x = 3 and dx = 0.4.Given equation:y = 3x² + 5x + 4At x = 2 and dx = 0.1
We have to estimate Ay using linear approximation.To estimate Ay using linear approximation:
Step 1: Find the derivative of y, y′.y′ = 6x + 5
Step 2: Find the value of y′ at x = 2.y′(2) = 6(2) + 5= 12 + 5= 17
Step 3: Use the formula for linear approximation:Δy = y′(a)Δx
Here, a = 2 and Δx = dx = 0.1
Substituting the values of a, Δx, and y′(a) in the above expression, we get:Δy = y′(a)Δx= 17 × 0.1= 1.7
To know more about differential visit:
brainly.com/question/32734171
#SPJ11
Find the volume under f(x, y) = x over the region enclosed by r = 3 sin (20) in the first quadrant.
The volume under f(x, y) = x over the region enclosed by r = 3 sin(20) in the first quadrant is 3.3074687644376737.
To find the volume, we can use the double integral in polar coordinates. The double integral in polar coordinates is:
∫∫ f(r, θ) r dr dθ
where f(r, θ) is the function we are integrating over, r is the radial coordinate, and θ is the angular coordinate.
In this case, f(r, θ) = x, r is between 0 and 3 sin(20), and θ is between 0 and π/2. Therefore, the double integral becomes:
∫∫ x r dr dθ
We can evaluate this integral using the following steps:
We can evaluate the inner integral first. This gives us:
∫ x r dr = x^2/2
We can then evaluate the outer integral. This gives us:
∫ x^2/2 dθ = x^2 θ/4
We can then substitute the limits of integration to get the final answer:
∫ x^2 θ/4 dθ = (3 sin(20))^2 π/4 = 3.3074687644376737
Therefore, the volume under f(x, y) = x over the region enclosed by r = 3 sin(20) in the first quadrant is 3.3074687644376737.
Here is a more detailed explanation of the calculation:
The first step is to evaluate the inner integral. This is done by integrating x r with respect to r. The result is x^2/2.
The second step is to evaluate the outer integral. This is done by integrating x^2/2 with respect to θ. The result is x^2 θ/4.
The third step is to substitute the limits of integration. In this case, the limits of integration are from 0 to π/2.
The fourth step is to simplify the result. This gives us the final answer, which is 3.3074687644376737.
To know more about coordinates click here
brainly.com/question/29189189
#SPJ11
A bowl contains two red balls, two white balls, and a fifth ball that is either red or white. Let p denote the probability of drawing a red ball from the bowl. We shall test the simple null hypothesis H0:p=3/5 vs. H1:p=2/5. Say we will draw four balls at random, one at a time and with replacement. Let X equal the number of red balls drawn. (a) Define a rejection region for this test in terms of X. (b) For the rejection region you've defined, find the values of α and β.
The rejection region is defined as X ≤ 1 or X ≥ 3, and the values of α and β are calculated as α = 241/625 and β = 312/625, respectively.
(a) The rejection region for this test can be defined based on the values of X. If X is less than or equal to a certain critical value or greater than or equal to another critical value, we reject the null hypothesis H0:p=3/5.
(b) To find the values of α and β, we need to determine the critical values and calculate the probabilities associated with them.
Let's consider the rejection region based on X. If we reject H0 when X ≤ 1 or X ≥ 3, we can calculate the probabilities of Type I and Type II errors.
Type I error (α) is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. In this case, it means rejecting H0 when the true probability of drawing a red ball is 3/5. The probability of X ≤ 1 or X ≥ 3 can be calculated using the binomial distribution:
P(X ≤ 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = C(4,0)[tex](3/5)^0[/tex][tex](2/5)^4[/tex] + C(4,1)[tex](3/5)^1[/tex][tex](2/5)^3[/tex]
= 16/625 + 96/625 = 112/625
P(X ≥ 3) = P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) = C(4,3)[tex](3/5)^3[/tex][tex](2/5)^1[/tex] + C(4,4)[tex](3/5)^4[/tex][tex](2/5)^0[/tex]
= 48/625 + 81/625 = 129/625
Therefore, α = P(X ≤ 1) + P(X ≥ 3) = 112/625 + 129/625 = 241/625.
Type II error (β) is the probability of failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false. In this case, it means failing to reject H0 when the true probability of drawing a red ball is 2/5. The probability of 1 ≤ X ≤ 2 can be calculated using the binomial distribution:
P(1 ≤ X ≤ 2) = P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) = C(4,1)(2/5)^1(3/5)^3 + C(4,2)[tex](2/5)^2[/tex][tex](3/5)^2[/tex]
= 96/625 + 216/625 = 312/625
Therefore, β = P(1 ≤ X ≤ 2) = 312/625.
To summarize, the rejection region is defined as X ≤ 1 or X ≥ 3, and the values of α and β are calculated as α = 241/625 and β = 312/625, respectively.
Learn more about rejection region here:
https://brainly.com/question/31634978
#SPJ11
Problem 4 (50 points) Determine where the given function is a linear transformation. T: R³ R³ defined by T(X₁, X₂, X3) = (X₁ — X₂, X2 − X3, X3 − X₁) -
The given function T: R³ → R³ defined by T(X₁, X₂, X₃) = (X₁ - X₂, X₂ - X₃, X₃ - X₁) is a linear transformation.
function is a linear transformation, we need to check two properties: additive property and scalar multiplication property.
1) Additive property: For any vectors u = (u₁, u₂, u₃) and v = (v₁, v₂, v₃) in R³, T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v).
Let's compute T(u + v) and T(u) + T(v):
T(u + v) = T(u₁ + v₁, u₂ + v₂, u₃ + v₃) = (u₁ + v₁ - u₂ - v₂, u₂ + v₂ - u₃ - v₃, u₃ + v₃ - u₁ - v₁)
T(u) + T(v) = (u₁ - u₂, u₂ - u₃, u₃ - u₁) + (v₁ - v₂, v₂ - v₃, v₃ - v₁) = (u₁ - u₂ + v₁ - v₂, u₂ - u₃ + v₂ - v₃, u₃ - u₁ + v₃ - v₁)
Comparing the two expressions, we can see that T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v), which satisfies the additive property.
2) Scalar multiplication property: For any scalar c and vector v = (v₁, v₂, v₃) in R³, T(c · v) = c · T(v).
Let's compute T(c · v) and c · T(v):
T(c · v) = T(c · v₁, c · v₂, c · v₃) = (c · v₁ - c · v₂, c · v₂ - c · v₃, c · v₃ - c · v₁)
c · T(v) = c · (v₁ - v₂, v₂ - v₃, v₃ - v₁) = (c · v₁ - c · v₂, c · v₂ - c · v₃, c · v₃ - c · v₁)
Comparing the two expressions, we can see that T(c · v) = c · T(v), which satisfies the scalar multiplication property.
Since the given function T satisfies both the additive property and scalar multiplication property, it is a linear transformation.
Learn more about vectors : brainly.com/question/29740341
#SPJ11
In the pick 4 game, you choose a 5 digit number, each digit from 0-9. If you pay a $1, the prize is $m thousand. Find the expected value of the game and write a sentence interpreding your answer in relation to the cost.
The expected value of the game is -$0.10.
The expected value of a game is a measure of the average amount of money a player can expect to win or lose per game over a long period of time. To calculate the expected value, we multiply each possible outcome by its probability of occurring, and then sum up the results. In this case, the cost of playing the game is $1, and the prize is $m thousand.
There are a total of 10,000 possible 5-digit numbers in the game, ranging from 00000 to 99999. Since each digit can be any number from 0 to 9, there are 10 possible choices for each digit. Therefore, the probability of choosing any particular 5-digit number is 1/10,000.
The expected value of the game can be calculated as follows:
Expected Value = (Probability of winning * Prize) - (Probability of losing * Cost)
= (1/10,000 * m) - (9,999/10,000 * 1)
= (m/10,000) - 9,999/10,000
= m/10,000 - 0.9999
Since we are given that the cost of playing the game is $1, we can substitute m = 1,000 (since the prize is $m thousand) into the equation:
Expected Value = 1,000/10,000 - 0.9999
= 0.1 - 0.9999
= -0.8999
Therefore, the expected value of the game is -$0.10. This means that, on average, a player can expect to lose $0.10 per game over a long period of time.
Learn more about Expected value
brainly.com/question/28197299
#SPJ11
9. Suppose that X1, X2, Xs.... Nu, o2) for some µ and some o² > 0, and let YX1-X for each n. (a) What is Cov (X, Y)?
(b) Are X and Y necessarily independent? Explain.
Therefore, the covariance between X and Y is Cov(X, Y) = E[X] - E[X].
Therefore, the independence of X and Y depends on the specific distributions of X and Y, as well as their relationship defined by Y = X - µ. Without further information about the distributions, we cannot conclude whether X and Y are independent.
(a) To find the covariance between X and Y, we can use the definition of covariance:
Cov(X, Y) = E[(X - E[X])(Y - E[Y])]
Since Y = X - µ, we can substitute this into the equation:
Cov(X, Y) = E[(X - E[X])(X - µ - E[X])]
Expanding this equation:
Cov(X, Y) = E[X - X(E[X] + µ) + E[X]µ + E[X]]
Since µ is a constant, E[X] and µ can be pulled out of the expectation:
Cov(X, Y) = E[X] - E[X(E[X] + µ)] + E[X]µ + E[X]
Now, using the linearity of expectation:
Cov(X, Y) = E[X] - E[X]E[X] - E[X]µ + E[X]µ + E[X]
Cov(X, Y) = E[X] - E[X]
Therefore, the covariance between X and Y is Cov(X, Y) = E[X] - E[X].
(b) X and Y are not necessarily independent. Independence between two random variables implies that their covariance is zero (Cov(X, Y) = 0). However, from the calculation in part (a), we can see that the covariance between X and Y is equal to E[X] - E[X].
If E[X] is not equal to E[X], then Cov(X, Y) is nonzero, indicating that X and Y are not independent. In other words, the values of X provide information about the values of Y, and vice versa.
Therefore, the independence of X and Y depends on the specific distributions of X and Y, as well as their relationship defined by Y = X - µ. Without further information about the distributions, we cannot conclude whether X and Y are independent.
To know more about covariance:
https://brainly.com/question/32470069
#SPJ4
2. Each day, the United States Customs Service has historically intercepted about $28 Million in contraband goods being smuggled into the country with a standard deviation of $16 Million per day. On 64 randomly chosen days in 2002 , the U.S. Customs Service intercepted an average of $30.3 Million in contraband goods. Does the sample indicate (at a 5\% level of significance), that the Customs Commission should be concerned that smuggling has increased above its historic level?
Based on the given information, the United States Customs Service historically intercepts about $28 million in contraband goods per day, with a standard deviation of $16 million. A sample of 64 randomly chosen days in 2002 showed an average interception of $30.3 million. The question is whether this sample indicates, at a 5% level of significance, that smuggling has increased above its historic level.
To determine if the sample indicates a significant increase in smuggling, a hypothesis test can be performed. The null hypothesis (H0) would state that the average interception remains at the historic level of $28 million, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) would state that the average interception has increased above $28 million.
Using the sample data, a t-test can be conducted to compare the sample mean of $30.3 million to the population mean of $28 million. The test would consider the sample size (64), the sample mean, the population mean, and the population standard deviation to calculate the test statistic and the corresponding p-value.
If the p-value is less than the significance level of 5%, it would provide evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that smuggling has increased above its historic level. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than or equal to 5%, it would suggest that there is not enough evidence to support the claim of an increase in smuggling.
The final conclusion regarding whether the Customs Commission should be concerned about the increase in smuggling would depend on the outcome of the hypothesis test and the comparison of the p-value to the significance level.
To learn more about Hypothesis test - brainly.com/question/29996729
#SPJ11
Please answer all, thank you for the help!
1. Which correlation coefficient is the strongest?
–2.00
+.79
+.37
-.81
The strongest correlation coefficient is -2.00.A correlation coefficient is a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. The closer the correlation coefficient is to -1 or 1, the stronger the relationship.
A correlation coefficient of -2.00 is the strongest negative correlation possible, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable decreases.
The other correlation coefficients are +0.79, +0.37, and -0.81. A correlation coefficient of +0.79 is a strong positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable also increases. A correlation coefficient of +0.37 is a weak positive correlation. A correlation coefficient of -0.81 is a strong negative correlation.
Therefore, the strongest correlation coefficient is -2.00.
Here is a table that summarizes the correlation coefficients and their strengths:
Correlation coefficient | Strength
------- | --------
-2.00 | Strong negative
0.79 | Strong positive
0.37 | Weak positive
-0.81 | Strong negative
Learn more about correlation coefficient here:
brainly.com/question/30087774
#SPJ11
Last Sunday I was coming back from a trip by car and I was stopped in the traffic. In that moment I was oy the seaside, and from the car I saw several people fishing, or better, standing in front of their fishing ods, waiting for a fish. I counted 10 fishermen. During the stop, I paid attention all the time in order to see when one of them catch a fish. After 12 minutes, the traffic jam resolved, and I left. During those 12 minutes, I didn't observe any fish caught by any of those 10 fishermen. A bit surprised, I asked a friend of mine, who is used to fish in that place, how many fishes are caught in average. He claims that in that place and in that conditions (hour, weather, ...) the expected number of ishes caught in 1 hour is 1 . 1) If the claim of my friend is correct, how many fishes I should expect to be caught by the 10 fishermen during my observation? 2) Which distribution better describes the probability to observe v fishes caught in that observation time (12 minutes). Write the explicit formula and calculate the standard deviation. 3) If the claim of my friend is correct, what is the probability to observe my result (0 caught in 12 minutes)? Is my observation compatible with the claim of my friend? * * Consider the result unacceptably unlikely if it there are less than 5% probability to have such result or norst.
Expected number of fish caught in 12 minutes is 2. Poisson distribution describes the probability, with λ = 0.2 and standard deviation sqrt(0.2). Probability of observing 0 fish is approximately 0.8187, supporting your friend's claim.
If the expected number of fish caught in 1 hour is 1, then the expected number of fish caught in 12 minutes (1/5th of an hour) would be 1/5 of the average, which is 1/5 = 0.2. Therefore, you should expect around 0.2 * 10 = 2 fish to be caught by the 10 fishermen during your observation. The distribution that better describes the probability to observe v fishes caught in 12 minutes is the Poisson distribution. The explicit formula for the Poisson distribution is P(v; λ) = (e^(-λ) * λ^v) / v!, where λ is the average number of events in the given time interval. In this case, λ = 0.2, and v represents the number of fish caught. To calculate the standard deviation, you can use the formula sqrt(λ).
To calculate the probability of observing 0 fish caught in 12 minutes, you can use the Poisson distribution formula with v = 0 and λ = 0.2. The probability is P(0; 0.2) = (e^(-0.2) * 0.2^0) / 0! = e^(-0.2) ≈ 0.8187. As the probability is greater than 5%, your observation is compatible with the claim of your friend.
Expected number of fish caught in 12 minutes is 2. Poisson distribution describes the probability, with λ = 0.2 and standard deviation sqrt(0.2). Probability of observing 0 fish is approximately 0.8187, supporting your friend's claim.
To learn more about probability click here
brainly.com/question/11034287
#SPJ11
The Tenth Annual Health Care in Canada Survey is a survey of the Canadian public’s and health care providers’ opinions on a variety of health care issues, including quality of health care, access to health care, health and the environment, and so forth. A description of the survey follows: The 10th edition of the Health Care in Canada Survey was conducted by POLLARA Research between October 3rd and November 8th, 2007. Results for the survey are based on telephone interviews with nationally representative samples of 1,223 members of the Canadian public, 202 doctors, 201 nurses, 202 pharmacists and 201 health managers. Public results are considered to be accurate within ± ± 2.8%, while the margin of error for results for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and managers is ± ± 6.9%.
Step 1: Why is the accuracy greater for the public than for health care providers and managers?
The sample size for the public is much larger, so the survey is more accurate for this group.
The sample size for the health care providers and managers is much larger, so the survey is more accurate for the public.
The sample size for the health care providers and managers is much smaller, so the survey is more accurate for this group.
Step 2: Why do you think they sampled the public as well as health care providers and managers?
It's likely that people working in health-related fields have opinions that differ from those of the public.
It's likely that people working in health-related fields have the same opinions as the public.
To increase the sample size.
(a) The accuracy is greater for the public than for health care providers and managers because the sample size for the public is much larger.
(b) The survey includes both the public and health care providers/managers to account for potential differences in opinions and perspectives between these two groups.
(a) The accuracy is greater for the public than for health care providers and managers because the sample size for the public is much larger. In statistical surveys, a larger sample size generally leads to greater accuracy and a smaller margin of error. The survey conducted by POLLARA Research included 1,223 members of the Canadian public, which provides a larger and more representative sample of the general population. With a larger sample size, the results obtained from the public can be considered more accurate within a smaller margin of error (±2.8%).
(b) The survey includes both the public and health care providers/managers to account for potential differences in opinions and perspectives between these two groups. It is likely that people working in health-related fields, such as doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and health managers, may have specialized knowledge and experiences that could influence their opinions on health care issues. By including both the public and health care providers/managers in the survey, researchers can capture a more comprehensive picture of the opinions and perspectives within the Canadian health care system. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of the various stakeholders' viewpoints and helps inform policy decisions by considering the perspectives of both the general public and professionals in the field.
In summary, the larger sample size of the public contributes to higher accuracy in survey results, while including both the public and health care providers/managers allows for a more comprehensive understanding of opinions and perspectives within the Canadian health care system.
Learn more about accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/16942782
#SPJ11
Assume that a procedure yields a binomial distribution. Determine the probability given the number of trials and the probability of success. Round to four decimal places. n-15, p=0.38, find P(At least
The probability of getting at least 10 successes out of 15 trials with a probability of success of 0.38 is: 0.6029.
To solve this problem, we can use the binomial probability formula which is:
P(X = k) = (n C k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)
where n is the number of trials, p is the probability of success, X is the random variable representing the number of successes, and k is the number of successes.
In this case, we're given n = 15 and p = 0.38. The probability of getting at least a certain number of successes can be found by summing the probabilities of getting that number of successes or more. So, we need to calculate the following probabilities:
P(X ≥ 10) = P(X = 10) + P(X = 11) + P(X = 12) + ... + P(X = 15)
To find these probabilities, we can use the binomial probability formula for each value of k and sum them up. Alternatively, we can use a calculator or software that has a binomial probability distribution function.
Using a calculator or software, we can determine that the probabilities are as follows:
P(X = 10) = 0.1946
P(X = 11) = 0.1775
P(X = 12) = 0.1263
P(X = 13) = 0.0703
P(X = 14) = 0.0278
P(X = 15) = 0.0065
Therefore, the probability of getting at least 10 successes out of 15 trials with a probability of success of 0.38 is:
P(X ≥ 10) = 0.1946 + 0.1775 + 0.1263 + 0.0703 + 0.0278 + 0.0065 = 0.6029 (rounded to four decimal places)
So, the answer is 0.6029.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
Suppose the following model for Comparison of means: iid Yij = μi + Exj, where Exj 22² N(0,5²) and {i= 1, ..., k j = 1,..., Mi Show that i = yi and that Var (2x) = 0² (1-1), when rez-yof-yo. = Yi ن
The given model represents a comparison of means where the observations Yij are independent and identically distributed with mean μi and an error term Exj.
The Exj term follows a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 5². We are required to show that i = yi, and that Var(2x) = 0²(1-1) when rez-yof-yo = Yi.
To show that i = yi, we need to demonstrate that the mean of the observations Yij, denoted by i, is equal to the true underlying mean μi. Since Yij = μi + Exj, it follows that the mean of Yij is given by E(Yij) = E(μi + Exj) = μi + E(Exj). As the error term Exj has a mean of 0, we have E(Yij) = μi + 0 = μi, which confirms that i = yi.
To show that Var(2x) = 0²(1-1) when rez-yof-yo = Yi, we consider the variance of 2x, denoted by Var(2x). Since Exj has a variance of 5², the variance of 2x is given by Var(2x) = Var(2Exj) = 4Var(Exj) = 4(5²) = 20². When rez-yof-yo = Yi, the variance of Yi is 0², which implies that there is no variation in the observations Yi. Therefore, Var(2x) = 20²(1-1) = 0², as there is no variability in the observations when rez-yof-yo = Yi.
To learn more about mean click here:
brainly.com/question/31101410
#SPJ11
You are looking for a difference between 3 groups with different subjects in each group, the data are based off a subjective rating, scale.
a. Two-Way Independent Groups ANOVA
b. Kruskal Wallis Non-parametric ANOVA
c. Levene's test
d. Mann Whitney U test
You are looking for a difference between 4 groups with the same subjects in each group, and the data is ratio. Assume there was homogeneity of covariance.
a. One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA
b. Kruskal Wallis Non-parametric ANOVA
c. Friedman' Non-parametric ANOVA
d. Phi Correlation
a. Two-Way Independent Groups ANOVA: This test is suitable when you have two independent variables (such as Group and Subject) and want to assess their effects on a continuous dependent variable (subjective rating scale data).
For the first scenario, where you have three groups with different subjects and subjective rating scale data, the appropriate statistical tests are:
b. Kruskal-Wallis Non-parametric ANOVA: This test is an alternative to the parametric ANOVA when the assumptions for the ANOVA are not met. It is used for comparing three or more independent groups with ordinal or continuous dependent variables. In this case, it can be employed if the subjective rating data do not meet the assumptions of normality or equal variances.
c. Levene's test: This is not directly used to compare group differences but rather to assess the equality of variances across groups. It can be used as a preliminary test to determine if the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated, which is required for the parametric tests like the Two-Way Independent Groups ANOVA.
d. Mann-Whitney U test: This non-parametric test is applicable when you have two independent groups and want to determine if there are significant differences between them. It can be used as an alternative to the Two-Way Independent Groups ANOVA if the subjective rating data do not meet the assumptions of normality or equal variances.
For the second scenario, where you have four groups with the same subjects and ratio data, assuming homogeneity of covariance, the appropriate tests are:
a. One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA: This test is used when you have one independent variable (such as Group) and repeated measures or paired data. It assesses whether there are significant differences between the means of the four groups. However, note that the assumption of homogeneity of covariance may not be applicable in this case.
b. Kruskal-Wallis Non-parametric ANOVA: Similar to the previous scenario, this test can be used when the assumptions of parametric ANOVA are not met. It is suitable for comparing three or more independent groups with ordinal or continuous dependent variables.
c. Friedman's Non-parametric ANOVA: This test is used when you have one independent variable (such as Group) and repeated measures or paired data. It is the non-parametric equivalent of the One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA and can be used if the assumptions of the parametric test are not met.
d. Phi Correlation: This measure is used to assess the association between two categorical variables, typically with a 2x2 contingency table. It is not appropriate for comparing
Learn more about independent variables
https://brainly.com/question/32711473
#SPJ11
Service time for a customer coming through a checkout counter in a retail store is a random variable with the mean of 2.5 minutes and standard deviation of 0.5 minutes. Suppose that the distribution of service time is fairly close to a normal distribution. Suppose there are two counters in a store, n1=10 customers in the first line and n2=26 customers in the second line. Find the probability that the difference between the mean service time for the shorter line Xˉ1 and the mean service time for the longer one Xˉ2 is more than 1.0 minutes. Assume that the service times for each customer can be regarded as independent random variables. Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). P=
The probability that the difference between the mean service time for the shorter line Xˉ1 and the mean service time for the longer one Xˉ2 is more than 1.0 minutes is approximately 0.0002 and the answer is rounded to two decimal places is 0.00.
Given data:
Mean, μ = 2.5 minutes
Standard Deviation, σ = 0.5 minutes
n1=10 customers in the first line
n2=26 customers in the second line
Let X1 and X2 be the service time of two counters respectively.
Assume that the service times for each customer can be regarded as independent random variables. Now, the difference between the mean service time for the shorter line Xˉ1 and the mean service time for the longer one Xˉ2 is given by:
μ1−μ2 = (Xˉ1−Xˉ2)≥1.0 minutes.
We know that the difference of two independent normal distribution is also a normal distribution with the following parameters:
μ1−μ2 = (Xˉ1−Xˉ2) ~ N(μ1−μ2,σ21/n1+σ22/n2)
where N is a normal distribution, μ1 is the mean of X1 and μ2 is the mean of X2.
Now, we need to calculate the probability that the difference between the mean service time for the shorter line Xˉ1 and the mean service time for the longer one Xˉ2 is more than 1.0 minutes. In other words, we need to find:
P((Xˉ1−Xˉ2)≥1.0)
We need to calculate the value of Z-score, which is given by:
Z= (Xˉ1−Xˉ2−μ1−μ2)/(σ21/n1+σ22/n2)
Putting the given values, we get:
Z= (0–1)/(0.5^2/10 + 0.5^2/26)≈−3.56
The probability of the given event can be obtained using the standard normal distribution table.We have: P(Z < −3.56) ≈ 0.0002
Therefore, the probability that the difference between the mean service time for the shorter line Xˉ1 and the mean service time for the longer one Xˉ2 is more than 1.0 minutes is approximately 0.0002 and the answer is rounded to two decimal places is 0.00. Note: The given probability is very small (close to 0), which implies that the event of the difference of service time being more than 1 minute is highly unlikely.
Learn more about the independent random variables from the given link-
https://brainly.com/question/30285853
#SPJ11
A humane society claims that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet. In a random sample of 500 households in that country, 310 say they own a pet. At α=0.05, is there enough evidence to support the societys claim? Complete parts (o) through (c) below. (a) Identify the claim and state H 0
and H a
. Identify the claim in this scenario. Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box to complete your choice. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) A. The percentage households in the country that own a pet is not B. More than % of households in the country own a pet. C. Less than \% of households in the country own a pet. D. Wo households in the country own a pet. Let p be the population proportion of successes, where a success is a household in the country that owns a pet. State H 0
and H a
Select ine correct choice below and fill in the answer boxes to complete your choice. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
we reject the null hypothesis.
The given problem is related to testing of hypothesis. A humane society claims that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet. In a random sample of 500 households in that country, 310 say they own a pet. At α = 0.05, is there enough evidence to support the society’s claim?
Identify the claim and state H0 and Ha.The claim of the humane society can be stated asH0: p ≥ 0.66 (Claim of the society)Ha: p < 0.66 (Opposite of the claim of the society)Here, p is the population proportion of households in the country that owns a pet.
Compute the test statistic.z = (p - P) / √[P(1 - P) / n]z = (0.62 - 0.66) / √[(0.66)(0.34) / 500]z = - 2.1978 (rounded off to four decimal places)Therefore, the test statistic is z = -2.1978 (approx). (c) Determine the P-value and state the conclusion.The P-value can be obtained from the standard normal distribution table, corresponding to the calculated test statistic.P-value = P(Z < -2.1978) ≈ 0.014.
Therefore, we can conclude that the percentage of households in the country that owns a pet is less than 66%.Main Answer:Claim of the humane society is H0: p ≥ 0.66 and Ha: p < 0.66The test statistic is z = -2.1978 (approx).P-value = P(Z < -2.1978) ≈ 0.014Since the calculated P-value (0.014) is less than the level of significance (α = 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.
There is enough evidence to support the claim of the humane society that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet. Therefore, we can conclude that the percentage of households in the country that owns a pet is less than 66%.Answer more than 100 words: A humane society claims that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet. In a random sample of 500 households in that country, 310 say they own a pet.
At α = 0.05, is there enough evidence to support the society’s claim? To solve this problem, we need to set up the null and alternative hypotheses.
The claim of the humane society can be stated as H0: p ≥ 0.66 (Claim of the society) Ha: p < 0.66 (Opposite of the claim of the society)Here, p is the population proportion of households in the country that owns a pet. We need to find the test statistic and compute its P-value. The test statistic can be calculated asz = (p - P) / √[P(1 - P) / n]Here, P is the value of the proportion under the null hypothesis. We assume P = 0.66 under the null hypothesis.
The sample size n is 500. The sample proportion can be calculated asp = 310 / 500 = 0.62Substituting the given values in the formula for the test statistic, we getz = (0.62 - 0.66) / √[(0.66)(0.34) / 500]z = - 2.1978 (rounded off to four decimal places)Therefore, the test statistic is z = -2.1978 (approx).
The P-value can be obtained from the standard normal distribution table, corresponding to the calculated test statistic.
The P-value is the area to the left of the test statistic on the standard normal distribution curve. In this case, since the alternative hypothesis is one-tailed (p < 0.66), we find the area to the left of the test statistic. P-value = P(Z < -2.1978) ≈ 0.014Since the calculated P-value (0.014) is less than the level of significance (α = 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.
There is enough evidence to support the claim of the humane society that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet.
Therefore, we can conclude that the percentage of households in the country that owns a pet is less than 66%.
Since the calculated P-value (0.014) is less than the level of significance (α = 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence to support the claim of the humane society that less than 66% of households in a certain country own a pet. Hence, the conclusion is that the sample data provide sufficient evidence to suggest that less than 66% of households in the country own a pet.
To know more about null hypothesis visit:
brainly.com/question/29892401
#SPJ11
Wait times at your local coffee shop are equally likely between 1 and 6 minutes. Find the probability function f(x) and draw the function on a set of labeled axes. Then find the following probabilities. Include the appropriate work to support your answer. a. Find the probability of waiting more than 5 minutes. c. Find The probability of waiting less than 90 seconds. b. Find the probability of waiting between 3 and 5 minutes. d. Find the average wait time and standard deviation of wait times.
Wait times at a local coffee shop can range from 1 to 6 minutes. It is equally likely to wait any duration within this range.
The formula for a probability function f(x) is given as:P(X=x) = f(x)where, X = value of the random variable,x = an individual outcome P(X = x) = the probability of the event f(x) = the probability of X taking the value x.The probability function f(x) for the given information is:P(X=x) = 1/6, for all x {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.Now, we need to calculate the following probabilities.
a. Find the probability of waiting more than 5 minutes. P(X > 5) = P(X = 6) = f(6) = 1/6So, the probability of waiting more than 5 minutes is 1/6.
b. Find the probability of waiting between 3 and 5 minutes .P(3 ≤ X ≤ 5) = P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) + P(X = 5)= f(3) + f(4) + f(5) = 1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 = 3/6 = 1/2The probability of waiting between 3 and 5 minutes is 1/2.
c. Find the probability of waiting less than 90 seconds.90 seconds is equivalent to 1.5 minutes. Therefore, P(X < 1.5) = P(X = 1) = f(1) = 1/6So, the probability of waiting less than 90 seconds is 1/6.
d. Find the average wait time and standard deviation of wait times. The mean and variance of the probability function are given as:μ = ∑(x * P(x)) = (1 * 1/6) + (2 * 1/6) + (3 * 1/6) + (4 * 1/6) + (5 * 1/6) + (6 * 1/6) = 21/6 = 3.5σ^2 = ∑(x - μ)^2 P(x) = (1 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) + (2 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) + (3 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) + (4 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) + (5 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) + (6 - 3.5)^2 (1/6) = 17.5/3 = 5.833Therefore, the standard deviation of wait times is σ = sqrt(5.833) ≈ 2.42.
To know more about range visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29204101
#SPJ11
The half-life of a radioactive substance is 4.8 hours. a) Write an equation to model the amount of grams of the substance remaining, A, after t. hours, if there is an initial amount of 450 grams. b) What is the equation of the asymptote for this function? Is the asymptote a realistic part of the mathematical model in this scenario? c) Determine the instantaneous rate of change when 50 grams of the substance remains. Explain what this value represents in context.
a) A(t) = 450 * (1/2)^(t/4.8)
b) The asymptote is y = 0, representing the limit the substance approaches.
c) Instantaneous rate of change when 50g remains is (ln(1/2)) * 50,
a) The equation to model the amount of grams of the substance remaining, A, after t hours can be represented by the exponential decay formula:
A(t) = A₀ * (1/2)^(t/h)
Where:
A(t) is the amount of grams remaining after t hours,
A₀ is the initial amount of grams (450 grams in this case),
t is the time in hours, and
h is the half-life of the substance (4.8 hours in this case).
Therefore, the equation is:
A(t) = 450 * (1/2)^(t/4.8)
b) The equation of the asymptote for this function is y = 0. The asymptote represents the limit that the amount of the substance approaches as time goes to infinity. In this case, as time passes, the substance continuously decays, approaching zero grams. So, the asymptote at y = 0 is a realistic part of the mathematical model for this scenario.
c) To determine the instantaneous rate of change when 50 grams of the substance remains, we need to find the derivative of the function A(t) with respect to t and evaluate it at A(t) = 50.
A'(t) = (ln(1/2)) * (450 * (1/2)^(t/4.8))
At A(t) = 50:
A'(t) = (ln(1/2)) * (450 * (1/2)^(t/4.8)) = (ln(1/2)) * 50
The value of (ln(1/2)) * 50 represents the instantaneous rate of change when 50 grams of the substance remains. In this context, it represents the rate at which the substance is decaying at that particular moment.
Learn more about Exponential decay formula here: brainly.com/question/28566787
#SPJ11
Your company is considering submitting a bid on a major project . You determine that the expected completion time 65 wee and the standard deviation is 12 weeks . It is assumed that the normal distribution applies . You wish to set the due date for the proje such that there is an 90 percent chance that the project will be finished by this time . What due date should be set ? ( pick the closes value to your computations ):
65.0
166.4
77.00
80.36
Not enough information
The due date for the project should be set at 77.00 weeks.
The due date with a 90 percent chance of completion, we need to find the z-score corresponding to the desired probability and use it to calculate the due date. The z-score is calculated by finding the number of standard deviations the desired probability lies from the mean. In this case, the z-score for a 90 percent probability is approximately 1.28.
Using the formula z = (X - μ) / σ, where X is the due date, μ is the mean completion time, and σ is the standard deviation, we can rearrange the formula to solve for X. Plugging in the values, we have 1.28 = (X - 65) / 12.
Solving for X, we get X = 65 + (1.28 * 12) ≈ 77.00 weeks. Therefore, setting the due date at 77.00 weeks will provide a 90 percent chance of completing the project on time.
Learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume generated by rotating the region 3 about the y-axis. Below is a = bounded by the curves y 3 + 2x − x² and y + x graph of the bounded region. 1,0 --1 Volume
To find the volume generated by rotating the region bounded by the curves y = 3 + 2x - x² and y = 1, about the y-axis, we can use the method of cylindrical shells.
The region bounded by the curves y = 3 + 2x - x² and y = 1 can be visualized as the area between the curves and above the x-axis. To find the volume of the solid, we can integrate the cross-sectional area of each cylindrical shell.
The differential volume of a cylindrical shell is given by dV = 2πx * (f(x) - g(x)) dx, where x represents the distance from the axis of rotation, f(x) represents the upper curve, and g(x) represents the lower curve.
In this case, the upper curve is y = 3 + 2x - x² and the lower curve is y = 1. We need to find the limits of integration by solving the equations for x that represent the points of intersection of the curves.
Once we have the limits of integration, we can integrate the expression dV = 2πx * (3 + 2x - x² - 1) dx from the lower limit to the upper limit to obtain the volume of the solid.
To know more about cross-sectional area here: brainly.com/question/30899946
#SPJ11
A particular fruit's weights are normally distributed, with a mean of 466 grams and a standard deviation of 31 grams.
The heaviest 12% of fruits weigh more than how many grams?
Give your answer to the nearest gram.
Therefore, the heaviest 12% of fruits weigh more than approximately 502 grams (rounded to the nearest gram).
To find the weight of the fruits that are heavier than the heaviest 12%, we can use the z-score formula.
First, we need to find the z-score corresponding to the 88th percentile (100% - 12% = 88%). The z-score represents the number of standard deviations a value is away from the mean.
Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find that the z-score for the 88th percentile is approximately 1.175.
Next, we can calculate the weight of the fruits using the z-score formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where:
z = z-score
x = weight of the fruits
μ = mean = 466 grams
σ = standard deviation = 31 grams
1.175 = (x - 466) / 31
Now, solve for x:
1.175 × 31 = x - 466
36.425 = x - 466
x = 466 + 36.425
x ≈ 502.425
Therefore, the heaviest 12% of fruits weigh more than approximately 502 grams (rounded to the nearest gram).
To know more about distribution:
https://brainly.com/question/31758565
#SPJ4
What is this When You Graph This
Graph Y= {x +31}
The graph will show a line slanting upwards from left to right, passing through the points (-5, 26), (0, 31), and (5, 36). The line will continue infinitely in both directions. This graph represents the relationship between the x and y variables described by the equation y = x + 31.
When graphing the equation y = x + 31, we can visualize a straight line on a coordinate plane. This equation represents a linear relationship between the x and y variables, where y is determined by adding 31 to the value of x.
To graph this equation, we can choose different values for x and calculate the corresponding y values to plot points on the coordinate plane. Let's select a few x-values and determine their corresponding y-values:
For x = -5:
y = -5 + 31 = 26
So, we have the point (-5, 26).
For x = 0:
y = 0 + 31 = 31
We obtain the point (0, 31).
For x = 5:
y = 5 + 31 = 36
We have the point (5, 36).
By plotting these points on the coordinate plane and connecting them, we can visualize the graph of the equation y = x + 31. The line will be a straight line with a positive slope of 1, which means that for every unit increase in x, y will increase by 1. The line intersects the y-axis at the point (0, 31), indicating that when x is 0, y is 31.
For more such information on: graph
https://brainly.com/question/19040584
#SPJ8
Answer the question for a normal random variable x with mean μ and standard deviation o specified below. (Round your answer to four decirnal places.) r=1.2 and σ=0.14. Find P(1.00
The probability that 1.00 < x < 1.40 is 0.8458, rounded to four decimal places
To find P(1.00 < x < 1.40) for a normal random variable x with a mean μ = 1.2 and a standard deviation σ = 0.14, we need to calculate the probability that x falls within the given range.
First, we need to standardize the values using the formula for the standard score (z-score):
z = (x - μ) / σ
For the lower bound, x = 1.00:
z_lower = (1.00 - 1.2) / 0.14
= -1.4286
For the upper bound, x = 1.40:
z_upper = (1.40 - 1.2) / 0.14
= 1.4286
Next, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the corresponding probabilities for the z-scores.
P(1.00 < x < 1.40) = P(z_lower < z < z_upper)
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability associated with each z-score.
P(z < -1.4286) = 0.0764
P(z < 1.4286) = 0.9222
To find the probability in the given range, we subtract the lower probability from the upper probability:
P(1.00 < x < 1.40) = P(z_lower < z < z_upper)
= P(z < z_upper) - P(z < z_lower)
= 0.9222 - 0.0764
= 0.8458
Therefore, the probability that 1.00 < x < 1.40 is 0.8458, rounded to four decimal places.
Learn more about: probability
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
a) In cass of outiliers on a dataset, describe which is the measure of central" tendency that you would use. Additionally, describe two ocher measures of central tendency. Include a formala for one of the two. (30 per cent) b) Compute the mean of the following sampie values: 157,40,21,8,10, 73,24,41,8 and thow that Σ(x−X)=0. (20 per cent) c) The mean weight of a large grocp of people is 180lb and the standard deviation is 15:th. If the weighis are aotmally distributed. find the probability that a person picked at rinson from the group will weight: 1. Between 160 and 180 is HiL Above 2001lb a1l: हelaw 150Ib (30 per cerit)
a) A formula for the mean is:
mean = (Σx) / n
where Σx is the sum of all values and n is the number of values.
b) mean = 42.44
c) The probability of a person picked at random from the group weighing below 150 lb is 0.0228 or 2.28%.
a) In the case of outliers in a dataset, the measure of central tendency that would be used is the median. This is because outliers can skew the mean, making it an inaccurate representation of the center of the data. The median is less affected by extreme values and represents the middle of the data when arranged in order. Two other measures of central tendency are the mode and the mean. The mode is the value that appears most frequently in the dataset, while the mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.
Hence, A formula for the mean is:
mean = (Σx) / n
where Σx is the sum of all values and n is the number of values.
b) To compute the mean of the given sample values, we add them up and divide by the number of values:
mean = (157 + 40 + 21 + 8 + 10 + 73 + 24 + 41 + 8) / 9
mean = 382 / 9
mean = 42.44
To show that Σ(x−X) = 0, we need to calculate the deviations of each value from the mean and add them up. The formula for deviation is:
deviation = x - X
where x is the value and X is the mean.
So, the deviations for each value are:
157 - 42.44 = 114.56 40 - 42.44 = -2.44 21 - 42.44 = -21.44 8 - 42.44 = -34.44 10 - 42.44 = -32.44 73 - 42.44 = 30.56 24 - 42.44 = -18.44 41 - 42.44 = -1.44 8 - 42.44 = -34.44
If we add up all these deviations, we get:
Σ(x - X) = 0
This means that the sum of all deviations from the mean is zero, as expected.
Given that the mean weight of a large group of people is 180 lb and the standard deviation is 15 lb, we can use the normal distribution to find the probabilities of a person weighing between certain weight ranges.
a) To find the probability that a person picked at random from the group will weigh between 160 and 180 lb, we need to standardize the values using the formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where x is the weight, μ is the mean weight, and σ is the standard deviation.
For x = 160 lb:
z = (160 - 180) / 15 = -1.33
For x = 180 lb:
z = (180 - 180) / 15 = 0
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area under the curve between z = -1.33 and z = 0, which is the probability of a person weighing between 160 and 180 lb.
P(160 < x < 180) = P(-1.33 < z < 0) = 0.4082
Therefore, the probability of a person picked at random from the group weighing between 160 and 180 lb is 0.4082 or 40.82%.
b) To find the probability that a person picked at random from the group will weigh above 200 lb, we standardize the value:
z = (200 - 180) / 15 = 1.33
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area under the curve to the right of z = 1.33, which is the probability of a person weighing above 200 lb.
P(x > 200) = P(z > 1.33) = 0.0918
Therefore, the probability of a person picked at random from the group weighing above 200 lb is 0.0918 or 9.18%.
c) To find the probability that a person picked at random from the group will weigh below 150 lb, we standardize the value:
z = (150 - 180) / 15 = -2
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area under the curve to the left of z = -2, which is the probability of a person weighing below 150 lb.
P(x < 150) = P(z < -2) = 0.0228
Therefore, the probability of a person picked at random from the group weighing below 150 lb is 0.0228 or 2.28%.
Learn more about the probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ4
What advertising medium gives a brand the most credibility in influencing brand decisions? According to a survey, 41 % of Millennials point to TV. Complete parts (a) through (e).
a. To conduct a follow-up study that would provide 95% confidence that the point estimate is correct to within plus or minus 0.04 of the population proportion, how large a sample size is required? A sample size of nothing people is required.
B. To conduct a follow-up study that would provide 99% confidence that the point estimate is correct to within plus or minus0.04 of the population proportion, how many people need to be sampled?
C.To conduct a follow-up study that would provide 95% confidence that the point estimate is correct to within plus or minus blank of the population proportion, how large a sample size is required?
D. To conduct a follow-up study that would provide 99% confidence that the point estimate is correct to within plus or minus blank of the population proportion, how many people need to be sampled?
Discuss the effects of changing the desired confidence level and the acceptable sampling error on sample size requirements. Compare the sample sizes found in parts (a) through (d) to determine the effects of changing the desired confidence level and the acceptable sampling error on sample size requirements.
In this scenario, we are conducting a follow-up study to estimate the population proportion of Millennials who point to TV as the advertising medium that gives a brand the most credibility. We are given different confidence levels and acceptable sampling errors and asked to determine the required sample sizes. The effects of changing the confidence level and acceptable sampling error on sample size requirements are also discussed.
a. To obtain a 95% confidence level with a sampling error of plus or minus 0.04, we need to determine the sample size required. Using the formula for sample size calculation for estimating a proportion, n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / (E^2), where Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, p is the estimated proportion, and E is the acceptable sampling error, we can calculate the required sample size.
b. Similarly, for a 99% confidence level and a sampling error of plus or minus 0.04, we can use the same formula to calculate the required sample size.
c. The third question asks for the sample size required for a 95% confidence level with a blank value for the acceptable sampling error. We need the specific value for the acceptable sampling error to calculate the sample size.
d. Likewise, for a 99% confidence level with a blank value for the acceptable sampling error, we need the specific value to calculate the required sample size.
Changing the desired confidence level has an impact on the sample size requirement. A higher confidence level, such as 99%, requires a larger sample size compared to a lower confidence level, such as 95%. This is because a higher confidence level requires more precision in the estimation.
The acceptable sampling error also affects the sample size requirement. A smaller acceptable sampling error necessitates a larger sample size to achieve the desired level of precision. If we decrease the acceptable sampling error, the sample size increases, and vice versa.
By comparing the sample sizes calculated in parts (a) through (d) for different confidence levels and acceptable sampling errors, we can observe that higher confidence levels and smaller acceptable sampling errors lead to larger sample size requirements. This is because higher confidence levels and smaller sampling errors require more data to achieve the desired precision and confidence in the estimate.
To learn more about Z-score - brainly.com/question/31871890
#SPJ11
