according to the trial balance what is the working capital

The trial courts in the state of California are called the Superior Court. These are the courts where trials are held for both criminal and civil cases. The Superior Court is divided into different divisions such as criminal, civil, family, and probate.

Each county in California has its own Superior Court, which is responsible for handling cases that occur within its jurisdiction. These courts are often the first step in the legal system, where cases are heard and decided upon by a judge or a jury.

The Superior Court hears a variety of cases including misdemeanors, felonies, family law, juvenile law, and civil disputes. It is important to note that if someone is unhappy with the decision made in the Superior Court, they may have the option to appeal the decision to a higher court.

TO know more about Superior Court:

https://brainly.com/question/28629725

#SPJ11

The act of fraud when writers infer another’s work or idea is their own is known as plagiarism.

Plagiarism is an act of cheating by stealing and copying someone else's ideas, works, and content without giving them any credit or permission. This term applies to many forms of intellectual property, including books, articles, papers, websites, images, music, and videos. Plagiarism is not only unethical but also illegal in many countries around the world, and it is considered a serious offense in academic institutions.

Plagiarism can take many forms, including copying and pasting text from online sources, paraphrasing someone else's work, or submitting someone else's work as your own. The act of plagiarizing can be intentional or unintentional, but either way, it is still considered plagiarism and is not tolerated. To avoid plagiarism, writers must always give credit to their sources by citing them properly in their works. This means that any borrowed content or idea must be acknowledged and referenced to the original source. By doing this, writers can avoid plagiarism and ensure that their work is original and unique.

Learn more about Plagiarism here: https://brainly.com/question/4231278

#SPJ11

The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits excessive bail. This important amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified in 1791 and has been a cornerstone of the American criminal justice system.

The Eighth Amendment states, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." The provision specifically focuses on the issue of bail, which refers to the amount of money or property that individuals accused of a crime must provide as a guarantee of their appearance in court

.

The purpose of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive bail is to ensure fairness and prevent the unjust imprisonment of individuals solely due to their inability to pay exorbitant amounts of bail. It recognizes the principle of presumption of innocence and aims to prevent the potential abuse of power by the judicial system.

By prohibiting excessive bail, the Eighth Amendment promotes the principles of due process, equal protection under the law, and the preservation of individual rights. It serves as a safeguard against the potential violation of defendants' constitutional rights and helps maintain the balance between the interests of justice and the protection of individual liberties.

The interpretation and application of the Eighth Amendment have been subject to ongoing debates and legal challenges throughout history. Courts continue to grapple with defining what constitutes "excessive" bail, considering factors such as the severity of the offense, the defendant's flight risk, and the defendant's financial means.

To know more about  criminal justice refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14565663

#SPJ11

Courtroom deputy keeps order in the courtroom and announces the judge's entry to the courtroom.

The court bailiff or courtroom deputy is usually the person in charge of maintaining order in the courtroom and announcing the arrival of the judge. The court bailiff is in charge of preserving the courtroom's decorum, security and order.

They make sure that proper courtroom protocol is followed, offer the judge any assistance that is required, and generally support and assist the courtroom staff. The judge's entrance into the courtroom is also announced by the bailiff signaling the beginning of the case and establishing the court's authority.

Learn more about courtroom at:

brainly.com/question/30364730

#SPJ4

The maximum legal speed limit on a highway in New York is 55 miles per hour.

What is a speed limit? A speed limit is the legal maximum speed at which a car can travel on a specific road. Speed limits are typically shown on traffic signs and enforced by police. According to traffic laws, speed limits are put in place to ensure that drivers do not travel too quickly and endanger others. Like other states, New York has its own set of laws regulating speed limits on highways and roads. New York has established maximum speed limits for various types of roads, including highways, based on road design and safety factors.

The maximum legal speed limit on a highway in New York: In New York, the maximum legal speed limit on a highway is 55 miles per hour. This law applies to both divided highways and undivided highways. However, some highways in New York are designed for a higher speed limit, so drivers should always be aware of speed limit signs and adjust their speed accordingly. If a driver violates the speed limit, they may be issued a traffic ticket or fined. In addition, if they are driving at excessive speeds, they risk receiving a more severe punishment and putting themselves and others in danger.

Thus the answer to the question is 55 miles per Hour.

Learn more about speed limits at: https://brainly.com/question/28317028

#SPJ11

Currently, 30 states (as well as the federal government and the military) allow the use of the death penalty. Option a is correct.

The death penalty is the lawful act of executing a person as a punishment for a crime committed. There are several reasons why the death penalty is used, including deterrence of crime, punishment for heinous crimes, and retribution for the victims. However, there is a lot of debate on whether the death penalty is ethical or not.

Supporters argue that it is a necessary punishment to ensure public safety, while opponents argue that it is inhumane and violates basic human rights. Additionally, there have been cases of wrongful convictions and executions, which have raised questions about the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty as a form of punishment.

Therefore, a is correct.

Learn more about death penalty https://brainly.com/question/25182125

#SPJ11

The given assertion "During the bitter struggle over reconstruction policy, Congress overrode Johnson' veto of the Civil Rights Act." is true because  During the Reconstruction Era in the US, there was a disagreeable battle between President Andrew Johnson and Congress over the strategy and course of Recreation.

In this unique circumstance, Congress to be sure to supersede President Johnson's denial of the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was expected to safeguard the social liberties of recently liberated African Americans and furnish them with legitimate insurance.

Notwithstanding President Johnson's denial, Congress effectively established the regulation by superseding his rejection. This was a huge crossroads throughout the entire existence of Reproduction, exhibiting the emphatics of Congress.

Learn more about bitter struggle:

https://brainly.com/question/137673

#SPJ4

The idea that guesses that liberal states will not go to war with each other is the democratic peace thesis.

The option (C) is correct.

It is important to note that the democratic peace thesis does not suggest that democracies are immune to war or that they will always have peaceful relations. Instances of conflicts involving democratic states have occurred throughout history. However, the thesis argues that statistically, democracies are less likely to engage in war with one another compared to non-democratic states.

The democratic peace thesis has been the subject of extensive research and debate in the field of international relations. While its validity and applicability in all contexts may be questioned, it has contributed to the understanding of the relationship between democracy and peace.

Learn more about liberal states:

https://brainly.com/question/31428681

#SPJ4

By 1918, every state enacted a law requiring children to attend school. Correct option is B.

According to  fabulous accounts, the autocrats Yao and Shun(ca. 24th – 23rd century BC) established the first  seminaries. The first education system was created in Xia dynasty( 2076 – 1600 BC). During Xia dynasty, government  erected  seminaries to educate  nobles about rituals, literature and archery( important for ancient Chinese  nobles).   During Shang dynasty( 1600 BC to 1046 BC), normal people(  growers, workersetc.) accepted rough education. In that time,  nobles' children studied in government  seminaries. And normal people studied in private  seminaries. Government  seminaries were always  erected in  metropolises and private  seminaries were  erected in  pastoral areas. Government  seminaries paid attention on educating  scholars about rituals, literature, politics, music,  trades and archery. Private  seminaries educated  scholars to do farmwork and handworks.

To know more about law:

https://brainly.com/question/27888657

#SPJ4

Data lifecycle management (DLM) is most appropriately described by the a) tools and processes used to handle data both during and after a research investigation.

Data life cycle management would give a record of the flow of information from acquisition, initial storage, until the point at which the information becomes outdated after being utilized and discarded. DLM can be used by other researchers to examine the validity of their own work and to determine the rationale for their usage of particular data.

A data lifecycle is the series of steps that a specific piece of data takes from the time it is created or captured until it is eventually archived and/or deleted at the conclusion of its useful life.

Data management professionals frequently name six or more stages in the data lifecycle, although specifics might vary.

To know more about DLM:

https://brainly.com/question/24924921

#SPJ4

Correct question:

Which of the following most accurately describes data lifecycle management (DLM)?

a) It refers to the tools and processes for handling data during a research study and after it concludes.

b) It refers to the obligation to share data imposed by professional journals.

c) It refers to the obligation to uphold data confidentiality imposed by federal law.

d) It refers to the data collection requirements of a particular organization.

Data lifecycle management is a policy-based strategy to manage the flow of data in an information system from creation to deletion. It helps manage data's volume, complexity and escalating IT infrastructure costs, ensuring data's quality, usability, integrity and security.

Data lifecycle management (DLM) is a policy-based approach to managing the flow of an information system's data throughout its life cycle: from creation and initial storage to the time when it becomes obsolete and is deleted. Within an organisation's IT environment, this process involves several key stages. They include data creation, data storage, data use, data sharing, data archiving, data backup, and eventually data deletion.

These stages embody a strategy that, when effectively implemented, helps businesses manage data's growing volume, its increasing complexity and diversity, and the escalating costs of enterprises' IT infrastructure and services. It's essentially about ensuring that data retains its quality, usability, integrity and security.

https://brainly.com/question/33502222

#SPJ12

The legal relief in an equity action in which the plaintiff seeks to have the court force the other party to perform according to the contract is called b. specific performance.

Specific performance is a remedy available in certain contract disputes where monetary damages are not considered adequate to fully compensate the injured party. In a suit for specific performance, the court orders the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations as specified in the agreement. This remedy is typically sought in cases involving unique or rare items, real estate, or contracts for personal services, where monetary compensation alone would not adequately remedy the situation.

It's important to note that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, and not all contracts will qualify for this remedy. The court will consider factors such as the nature of the contract, the feasibility of enforcing it, and whether the remedy is fair and just in the circumstances.

Learn more about contractual obligations here:

https://brainly.com/question/32285964

#SPJ11

In most states where political parties are strong, interest group influence tends to be weak and is not necessarily accurate or universally applicable.

The option (A) is correct.

The relationship between political parties and interest groups can vary significantly depending on the specific context and dynamics of a particular state or political system. While it is true that strong political parties can sometimes overshadow or diminish the influence of interest groups, it is not a universal rule.

The strength of interest group influence can depend on various factors, including the nature of the political system, the organization and mobilization of interest groups, the issue at hand, and the level of public support or opposition.

Learn more about political parties:

https://brainly.com/question/15061337

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

In most states where political parties are strong, interest group influence tends to be:

(A) weak and is not necessarily accurate or universally applicable.

(B) deep American value of support for the underdog.

(C) All of these.

The given statement "A deposition is an oral testimony given by a party or witness during the trial." is false because A deposition is not given during the trial itself, but rather during the pre-trial discovery phase of a legal proceeding.

It is a formal out-of-court testimony given under oath and recorded by a court reporter. Depositions are typically conducted by attorneys from both sides of a case, and the purpose is to gather information, establish facts, and uncover evidence before the trial.

The recorded testimony can be used as evidence in court, but the deposition itself is separate from the trial proceedings. The testimony given during a deposition can be used later in the trial as evidence.

Learn more about oral testimony:

https://brainly.com/question/32154580

#SPJ4

If the person is under 18, his provisional license will expire on his next birth date after date of issuance.

If a person is under 18 and has a provisional license, it will frequently expire on their subsequent birthday following the date of issuance in many jurisdictions. The provisional license is therefore valid until the holder turns 18, at which point they may need to apply for a different kind of license or fulfill certain requirements in order to get a regular driver's license.

For instance, if a person was born on September 15 and received their provisional license on June 1, 2023 their provisional license would typically expire on September 15, 2023.

Learn more about provisional license at:

brainly.com/question/32296567

#SPJ4

State law requires that you turn off your high beams and switch to low beams if a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction is within 300-500 feet.

In many states, the law requires drivers to switch from high beams to low beams when oncoming vehicles are within a certain distance. This distance is commonly referred to as "reasonable visibility". This means that if there is an oncoming vehicle at a distance where it is difficult for either driver to see clearly due to the intensity of the high beams, it is time to switch to low beams.

No specific distance is specifically mentioned in state law, but 300 to 500 feet is often considered a practical approximation. However, it is important to note that exact distances may vary depending on factors such as local traffic laws, weather conditions, road layouts and other relevant considerations.

To know more about beam headlight visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31847252

#SPJ4

If a third party believes an agent is acting with actual or apparent authority, he or she may sue the principal for "agency liability" or "vicarious liability."

Agency liability refers to the legal responsibility of a principal for the actions or omissions of their agent. It arises when the agent is acting within the scope of their authority, whether actual or apparent, and the principal can be held accountable for the agent's conduct.

Actual authority refers to the express or implied authority granted by the principal to the agent to act on their behalf. Apparent authority, on the other hand, refers to the authority that a reasonable third party would believe the agent possesses based on the principal's conduct and representations. Even if the agent does not have actual authority, the principal can still be held liable if they create an appearance of authority

By suing the principal for agency liability, the third party seeks to hold the principal accountable for the actions of their agent, even if they were not directly involved in the transaction or interaction with the third party. This legal principle helps protect the rights of third parties who reasonably rely on the authority and representation of agents in their dealings with the principal.

Learn more about third party  here

https://brainly.com/question/28731408

#SPJ11

Ghana's legal framework promotes sustainable forest development, community involvement, and international collaborations for global forest conservation.

Ghana's legal framework for managing forests which includes the Forestry Commission Act (1999) Act 571 and related instruments and guidelines is essential to the conservation and management of forests around the world. By weighing economic, social and environmental factors that the nation focuses on sustainable forest development.

The laws protect wildlife, biodiversity and forest reserves in an effort to stop encroachment and illegal logging. They also place a strong emphasis on community participation in decision making and benefit sharing which empowers local communities to manage forests.

Ghana has put in place forest certification programs to encourage ethical behavior and the traceability of timber products. Regulation compliance is guaranteed by effective enforcement and monitoring procedures. Ghana also actively participates in global partnerships and projects that address deforestation, climate change and sustainable development. Ghana makes a significant contribution to the management and conservation of the worlds forests through these measures.

Learn more about legal framework at:

brainly.com/question/30744854

#SPJ4

Any explosives or ammunition that the US military has not approved and classified for use.

Any explosives or ammunition that have not been accepted and type classified for use by the US military are referred to as non-standards, per AR 385-10. In other words, it alludes to explosives or ammunition that has not gone through the formal approval procedure and complied with the precise standards set forth by the military for their use.

The use of these unconventional explosives or ammunition within the military may be restricted or outlawed because they have not been evaluated, approved, or determined to be suitable for military operations. To maintain safety and security, it is crucial to adhere to the rules and regulations set forth in AR 385-10 with regard to the handling, storing and use of explosives and ammunition.

Learn more about US military at:

brainly.com/question/28357806

#SPJ4

The determination of whether a binding contract exists in this case would require a careful examination of the specific language used, the nature of the condition imposed, and the intent of the parties.

The Defendant initially made an offer to sell 2,600 shares in a company for $2.00 per share. This offer sets out the terms and conditions upon which the parties could enter into a contract. The Plaintiffs then responded by accepting the offer but added a condition. They stated that the acceptance would be effective only upon verification of the company's financial position and facilities, and they would pay the price of $2.00 per share based on that verification.

To assess whether a binding contract has been formed, we need to consider whether the Plaintiffs' response constitutes an acceptance or a counteroffer. If the response is deemed a counteroffer, it would terminate the original offer and require acceptance from the Defendant for a contract to be formed.

In this case, the Plaintiffs' response can be seen as both an acceptance and a conditional counteroffer. While they accepted the offer by expressing their intent to purchase the shares at the specified price, they introduced a condition regarding the verification of the company's financial position and facilities. Whether this condition would render their acceptance conditional and ineffective depends on the significance of the condition and whether it substantially alters the terms of the original offer.

If the condition is considered a minor modification or mere request for verification, it may not be considered a counteroffer and would not invalidate the acceptance. However, if the condition is seen as a material alteration that changes the terms of the original offer, it could be viewed as a counteroffer, requiring the Defendant's acceptance for a contract to be formed.

Learn more about binding contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/32959753

#SPJ11

The person named in the statement is Pablo Escobar, a notorious Colombian drug lord and leader of the Medellin Cartel. Escobar was one of the most powerful and ruthless criminals in history, known for his involvement in the illegal drug trade and violent tactics to defend and expand his empire.

In an effort to maintain control and eliminate threats, Escobar ordered the assassinations of three Colombian presidential candidates. This was done to influence and manipulate the political situation to his advantage.

Escobar also orchestrated the assassination of over 200 judges who threatened his practice by prosecuting drug cases and dismantling his criminal network. The purpose of the targeted assassination was to undermine the legal system's ability to hold him accountable and to perpetuate fear among those who might challenge his authority.

To know more about Colombia's presidency visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29555734

#SPJ4

The trial stage of the juvenile court process involves the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and a determination of the juvenile's guilt or innocence.

During the trial stage, the prosecution and defense present their respective cases in front of a judge or sometimes a jury. Evidence is presented, witnesses are questioned, and legal arguments are made to establish whether the juvenile is responsible for the alleged offense. The judge or jury then evaluates the evidence and makes a decision regarding guilt or innocence. If found guilty, the court proceeds to the disposition stage, where appropriate consequences or interventions are determined for the juvenile.

The trial stage in the juvenile court process serves as a pivotal moment where the evidence is examined, and a decision is made regarding the juvenile's culpability. It is an essential step in the legal process to ensure fairness and justice for juveniles involved in criminal cases.

To know more about juvenile court click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7579071

#SPJ11

Moral absolutism is a moral philosophy that postulates that there is a universal standard of morality that applies to everyone, at all times, and in all cultures.

Moral absolutists believe that there are absolute, objective truths and principles of morality that are inherent in the nature of the world and that can be discovered through reason. They believe that moral judgments are not merely subjective or relative to particular individuals, societies, or cultures but are grounded in objective facts about the world.

In other words, they hold that there are some things that are right or wrong, regardless of what anyone thinks or feels about them.  Moral absolutism has been criticized for its rigidity and inflexibility, which can lead to intolerance and dogmatism.

It can also be difficult to apply moral absolutes in practice, as the complexities of real-world situations often defy simplistic, black-and-white solutions. Nonetheless, moral absolutism continues to be a powerful and influential moral philosophy, particularly in religious and conservative circles.

Many people find comfort and guidance in the idea of a fixed and immutable moral order that transcends human subjectivity and provides a stable foundation for ethical decision-making.

Know more about philosophy here:

https://brainly.com/question/32939933

#SPJ11

A contract is a legally binding agreement, it promises two or more parties that establishes the rights and obligations of each party. It is a set of legally enforceable promises that create a mutual understanding and agreement among the involved parties.

To be considered a valid contract, certain elements must be present. These include an offer made by one party, the acceptance of that offer by another party, and an exchange of consideration, which refers to something of value that each party gives or promises to give in return. Additionally, the contract must demonstrate the intention of the parties to create legal obligations.

Once a contract is formed, it provides a framework for the parties to rely on and enforce their rights. If one party fails to fulfill their obligations as stated in the contract, the other party may seek legal remedies or compensation through the court system.

Contracts can cover a wide range of agreements, including business transactions, employment relationships, leases, sales of goods, and services, among others. They provide clarity, certainty, and protection to the parties involved, as they outline the terms and conditions that govern their interactions.

In summary, a contract is a legally enforceable set of promises that establishes the rights and obligations of the parties involved. It serves as a binding agreement that provides legal protection and remedies in case of non-compliance or breach.

To know more about contract refer:

https://brainly.com/question/27516414

#SPJ11        

Statement II., IV  and V  are incorrect in relation to the English Legal framework. The correct answer is II., IV., and V.

The English legal system is based on a number of important principles. First, statement I is untrue because the mischief rule permits judges to take into account the intent or wrong that a statute seeks to correct.

Second, the Human Rights Act of 1998 mandates that laws be applied in a way that is consistent with Convention rights to the extent that it is possible within the law itself supporting statement II. Third, statement III is incorrect because obiter dicta are non-binding remarks made by judges that offer additional commentary but do not constitute the basis for the decision.

Fourth, statement IV is untrue because the judge's job in a Crown Court trial is to oversee the proceedings, give legal advice and manage the trial, not to determine guilt or innocence. Finally, statement V is true because if necessary a higher court can overturn precedents created by lower courts.

Learn more about English legal system at:

brainly.com/question/32221418

#SPJ4

According to agnew and brezina, the effects of early family environment on traits conducive to crime can be significant.

Agnew and Brezina assert that early family environments have a sizable impact on criminal propensity traits. Adverse family circumstances can lead to the development of negative attitudes, poor self control and a lack of social bonding. These circumstances include parental conflict, harsh discipline and inconsistent parenting. In turn, these elements raise the probability of engaging in criminal and delinquent behavior.

A person's values, beliefs, and behaviors are greatly influenced by their upbringing, and dysfunctional family dynamics can inhibit the growth of prosocial attitudes and self control. Understanding the causes of criminal behavior and putting good prevention and intervention strategies in place depend on recognizing the influence of early family experiences on crime-related traits.

Learn more about prosocial attitudes at:

brainly.com/question/3367133

#SPJ4

In Colorado, Investor who owns 12 investment properties and sells one to an owner-occupant is exempt from real estate license law. The correct option is b.

An investor who owns 12 rental properties in Colorado and sells one to an owner-occupier is typically exempt from the state's real estate license requirements. Colorado law offers exemptions for people who sell their own properties as owners, particularly if the sales are infrequent and do not form a regular part of their business operations.

It's crucial to keep in mind that the exemption only pertains to the sale of the investor's own properties. A real estate license might be necessary if the investor frequently sells real estate or represents other people as real estate agents. The exemption is frequently predicated on the idea that the person is selling their personal property and not working as a real estate agent.

Learn more about real estate license at:

brainly.com/question/33439711

#SPJ4

In an adversarial legal system, opposing attorneys represent the interests of their clients while judges serve as impartial arbiters of the law and ensure fair proceedings by making decisions based on evidence and legal principles.

In an adversarial legal system, opposing attorneys advocate for the interests of their clients by making arguments, presenting evidence, and defending their positions. On the other hand, judges are neutral arbitrators tasked with interpreting and applying the law. They oversee fair proceedings, decide whether evidence is admissible and reach legal conclusions.

Judges keep a neutral and objective stance while attorneys actively advocate on behalf of their clients. This division of responsibilities supports efforts to uphold justice, safeguard individual rights and maintain fairness. While judges supervise the courtroom and render impartial decisions based on the law and the merits of the case, attorneys zealously represent their clients within the confines of the law.

Learn more about legal system at:

brainly.com/question/30852015

#SPJ4

The statement that 'Losers in civil cases may be required to pay monetary damages for their actions' is True. Also, most cases are settled before trial. Thus, that is also true.

What are civil cases? Civil cases are non-criminal lawsuits that may include private property disputes, breach of contract, or harassment cases. A civil case is a legal disagreement between two or more parties that arises from an accident, injury, contract, or business disagreement. In a civil suit, one party accuses the other of causing harm or inflicting loss, and the party bringing the claim is known as the plaintiff. Similarly, the accused party is known as the defendant.

The monetary damages in civil cases: The plaintiff, in a civil lawsuit, seeks monetary damages as compensation for the harm or loss incurred. Monetary damages awarded to the prevailing party in a civil lawsuit are intended to restore them to the position they were in before the incident occurred. The goal of monetary damages is to help the injured party regain their financial footing and cover any medical or hospital expenses that may have resulted from the incident.

Actions of the parties: The loser of a civil lawsuit is typically required to pay monetary damages for their actions, as it is the primary goal of civil litigation. Civil litigation is designed to provide financial compensation to the plaintiff who has been harmed or suffered losses as a result of the defendant's actions. In contrast, the defendant is required to pay the plaintiff monetary damages if they are found guilty of causing harm or loss to the plaintiff.

Learn more about Civil cases at: https://brainly.com/question/1065754

#SPJ11

The major contribution of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to globalization is It reduced barriers to international trade and investment. The correct option is C.

GATT, established in 1947 and succeeded by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, aimed to promote freer and fairer international trade. One of its primary objectives was the reduction of trade barriers, such as tariffs, quotas, and discriminatory practices, among participating nations.

By lowering trade barriers, GATT facilitated increased international trade and investment flows. It created a more open and predictable trading environment, encouraging countries to specialize in areas of comparative advantage and engage in mutually beneficial economic interactions.

The reduction of trade barriers promoted the exchange of goods, services, and capital across borders, leading to the expansion of global markets and integration of economies. GATT's efforts to liberalize trade and promote economic cooperation have been instrumental in driving globalization by fostering greater economic interdependence and facilitating the growth of global supply chains.

Learn more about GATT here:

https://brainly.com/question/30099667

#SPJ4