After reading the article "Competing on Analytics" written by Thomas Davenport, and using your findings from your research, please nospond to the following questions: 1. Why are analytics so important to business in today's society? 2. How do you currently employ analytics in your personal life or work life? 3. How does an individual (think of yourself) become an advocate for analytics in business? 4. What area(s) can you work on personally to improve your analytical mindset? WORTH 25PTS (200 WORD MINIMUM) NO PEER RESPONSE IS REQUIRED Competing on Analytics by Thomas Davonportpdf Due by Sunday of Week 4 (a) 11:59pm PST - Sunday, September 18 th, 2022

A rectangular box with a square base and a volume of 216 in³ is given. It is assumed that the cost of the material for the base is 30¢/square inch, and the cost of the material for the sides and top is 20¢/square inch.

The formulas to find the cost of the materials for the box and to minimize the cost of materials are to be determined. Also, we need to find out the minimum cost. Volume of rectangular box with square base, V = l²hGiven that, Volume of box, V = 216 in³Therefore, l²h = 216 in³ …(1)We know that the cost of material for the base is 30¢/square inch, and the cost of material for sides and top is 20¢/square inch.Since the base of the rectangular box is square, all the sides will be equal.So, let’s say that each side of the square base is l and the height of the rectangular box is h. So, the area of the base would be A1 = l² and the area of the sides would be A2 = 4lh + 2lh = 6lh.Cost of the material for the base, C1 = 30¢/square inch Cost of the material for the sides and top, C2 = 20¢/square inch Total cost of the material for the box, C = (30¢) (A1) + (20¢) (A2)Substituting the values of A1 and A2 in the above equation, we get:

C = (30¢) (l²) + (20¢) (6lh)C = 30l² + 120lh ... (2)

To minimize the cost, we need to differentiate the cost with respect to l, and equate it to zero.dC/dl = 60l + 120h = 0 … (3)Differentiating the above equation w.r.t l, we getd²C/dl² = 60Since the value of d²C/dl² is positive, it means that we have found the minimum value of the cost. Therefore, using equation (3), we can get the value of l as:l = -2hSubstituting this value of l in equation (1), we get:h = 6√3Substituting the value of h in equation (3), we get:l = -12√3Therefore, the minimum cost will be obtained when the dimensions of the rectangular box are h = 6√3 and l = -12√3.

Therefore, the formula to find the cost of the materials for the box is C = 30l² + 120lh. By finding the derivative of the cost equation w.r.t l, we get dC/dl = 60l + 120h = 0. By solving this equation, we get the value of l as -2h. Further, we obtain the value of h as 6√3 and l as -12√3. Finally, by substituting the value of h and l in the cost equation, we get the minimum cost as $43.20.

To learn more about minimum value visit:

brainly.com/question/14316282

#SPJ11

STATA is a versatile and robust software package that enables researchers and data analysts to effectively analyze and interpret data.

To create a new variable in STATA called "CI" that represents the 95% confidence interval for the variable "mean_age," you can use the following code:

stata

gen CI = mean_age - 1.96 * se_age, mean_age + 1.96 * se_age

This code calculates the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval using the formula you provided (mean_age - 1.96 * se_age and mean_age + 1.96 * se_age, respectively) and stores the result in the variable "CI."

Make sure you have the variables "mean_age" and "se_age" defined with the correct values before running this code.

To learn more about STATA  visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30638382

#SPJ11

The parameter of interest in this situation is whether or not the die rolls fives more often than it should.

In this situation, the parameter of interest is the probability or proportion of times that the die rolls a five in the long run. The experimenter suspects that the die is not weighted correctly and wants to determine if it rolls fives more frequently than the expected probability of 1/6 (approximately 0.167) for a fair six-sided die.

To test the die, the experimenter rolls it 60 times and records the number of times it lands on a five, which turns out to be 16. To calculate the proportion, the number of times the die rolled a five (16) is divided by the total number of rolls (60), resulting in a proportion of approximately 0.267, or 26.7%.

This observed proportion of 26.7% raises suspicion that the die might be biased towards rolling fives. However, it is important to note that this is a sample proportion based on a relatively small number of rolls. To draw more robust conclusions about the fairness of the die, a larger sample size would be needed. Statistical tests, such as hypothesis testing, can also be employed to determine the likelihood of the observed proportion occurring by chance alone and to make more definitive statements about the fairness of the die.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The parameter of interest is the proportion of times the die rolls a five. By comparing the observed proportion to the expected proportion, we can determine if the die is weighted correctly.

The parameter of interest in this situation is the proportion (percentage) of times that the die rolls a five in the long run.

To determine if the die is rolling fives more often than it should, we compare the observed proportion of fives rolled (16/60) to the expected proportion of 1/6. If the observed proportion is significantly different from the expected proportion, then it suggests that the die is not weighted correctly.

In this case, the observed proportion of 26.7% is higher than the expected proportion of 16.7%, indicating that the die may indeed be rolling fives more often than it should.

https://brainly.com/question/35467930

#SPJ12

There are 6,480,000 possible 7-digit phone numbers that satisfy the given conditions, where the first digit cannot be 0 or 1, and the number cannot start with 111.

To determine the number of possible 7-digit phone numbers, we need to consider the restrictions on the first digit and the constraint that the number cannot start with 111.

The first digit of the phone number cannot be 0 or 1. This means we have 8 options for the first digit: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Each of these digits can be chosen independently, so there are 8 possibilities for the first digit.

For the remaining 6 digits, we have 10 options for each digit, ranging from 0 to 9. Since each digit can be chosen independently, the number of possibilities for the remaining 6 digits is 10^6.

However, we need to account for the restriction that the number cannot start with 111. If the first three digits are all 1, then the number would violate this restriction. Therefore, we need to subtract the number of cases where the second, third, and fourth digits are also 1.

For each of these three digits (second, third, and fourth), we have 10 options (0-9) since they can be any digit except 1. Therefore, there are 10*10*10 = 1000 cases where the second, third, and fourth digits are all 1.

Subtracting these cases from the total number of possibilities, we get 8 * 10^6 - 1000 = 6,480,000.

Hence, there are 6,480,000 possible 7-digit phone numbers that satisfy the given conditions, where the first digit cannot be 0 or 1, and the number cannot start with 111.


To learn more about possibilities click here: brainly.com/question/32811211

#SPJ11

The test statistic is approximately -8.929.  and the p-value is approximately 0.0001, rounded to four decimal places.

1. To test the difference in proportions between the two age groups, we can use the normal distribution. The distribution to use for the test is:

P'1 - P'2 ~ N(0, ?)

Here, P'1 represents the proportion of tablet owners in the 16-29 age group, P'2 represents the proportion of tablet owners in the 30 and older age group, and N(0, ?) denotes the normal distribution with mean 0 and variance to be determined.

2. The test statistic for comparing two proportions is calculated as:

z = (P1 - P2) / sqrt(P * (1 - P) * ((1/n1) + (1/n2)))

where P = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2), x1 and x2 are the number of tablet owners in each group, and n1 and n2 are the respective sample sizes.

For the given data, we have:

x1 = 69 (number of tablet owners in the 16-29 age group)

n1 = 622 (sample size of the 16-29 age group)

x2 = 231 (number of tablet owners in the 30 and older age group)

n2 = 2318 (sample size of the 30 and older age group)

Using these values, we can calculate the test statistic:

P = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2) = (69 + 231) / (622 + 2318) = 0.0808

[tex]z = (P1 - P2) / sqrt(P * (1 - P) * ((1/n1) + (1/n2)))\\= (69/622 - 231/2318) / sqrt[n]{(0.0808 * (1 - 0.0808) * ((1/622) + (1/2318)))} \\≈ -8.929[/tex]

Therefore, the test statistic is approximately -8.929.

3. To find the p-value, we need to calculate the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as -8.929 (in the negative tail of the standard normal distribution). Since the test is two-tailed, we will consider the absolute value of the test statistic.

p-value ≈ 2 * P(Z < -8.929)

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the p-value associated with -8.929:

p-value ≈ 0.000 < 0.0001

Therefore, the p-value is approximately 0.0001, rounded to four decimal places.

know more about test statistic

https://brainly.com/question/33322856

#SPJ11

Answer:

False.

6 miles is farther than 6 kilometers. One mile is equal to 1.60934 kilometers, so 6 miles is equal to 6 x 1.60934 = 9.65604 kilometers. Therefore, 6 miles is farther than 6 kilometers.

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is:

Work/explanation:

We can't really compare two things if they have different units.

So we need to convert kilometers to miles first.

1 km is approximately equal to 0.621 miles.

So 6 km would be approximately 3.728 miles.

6 miles is further away than 3.728 miles.

6 km is not as far as 6 miles. And now we know why.

The probability that the boy will "die" after making his decision is 0.34.In this scenario, the boy has two options: going right or going left.

Each option has a certain probability of resulting in his "death." If he chooses to go right, the probability of dying is 0.30. If he chooses to go left, the probability of dying is 0.40. Since the boy has an equal probability of choosing either direction, we can calculate the overall probability of him dying by taking the average of the probabilities for each option.

To calculate this, we can use the formula for the expected value of a discrete random variable. Let X be the random variable representing the outcome of the boy's decision (1 for dying, 0 for surviving). The probability of dying when going right is 0.30, and the probability of dying when going left is 0.40. Therefore, the expected value E(X) is given by:

E(X) = (0.30 + 0.40) / 2 = 0.35

Rounding this value to the second decimal gives us the probability that the boy will "die" after making his decision, which is 0.34.

To learn more about probability refer:

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

We are given a random sample of n observations from an exponential distribution with a pdf of f(x;θ)=e^(θ−x)I(θ,∞)(x) and we are asked to show that S=X(1) is sufficient for θ. S=X(1) means the smallest value among all the observations,

This means the first indicator function is equal to 1. The second indicator function is 1 only when all observations are less than θ. Since we're looking for the maximum value of θ, we can assume that the first n-1 observations are all less than θ and only the nth observation is greater than or equal to θ.

This gives us:I(θ≥xi) = I(θ≥xn) ∏ I(θ≥xi; i=1,2,...,n-1) = I(θ≥xn)This can be simplified further by noting that if xn≥θ, the likelihood function would be 0 since the pdf of the exponential distribution is 0 for negative values of x. Therefore, the second indicator function can be written as:I(θ≥xn) = I(θ≥S)We can substitute the above expressions in the likelihood function and ignore the constant factors. This gives us:L(θ;x1,x2,…,xn) = I(θ≥S) ∏ I(xi≥S; i=1,2,...,n-1)We can see that the likelihood function is a function of θ only through the indicator function I(θ≥S). Therefore, S=X(1) is sufficient for θ.Answer:Thus, we have shown that S=X(1) is sufficient for θ.

To know more about random visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30789758

#SPJ11

(a) The general solution is: x = -132t - s

y = 4t - 2s , z = t , where t and s can take any real values.

(a) To put the matrix B into reduced row echelon form, we perform row operations to transform it into an upper triangular matrix. The resulting matrix is:

1 0 132 1

0 1 -4 2

0 0 0 0

The homogeneous system of equations represented by Bx = 0 has 4 equations in 3 unknowns. Since the matrix B has a row of zeros, there is a non-trivial solution. To find the general solution, we can set the free variables to arbitrary values (such as t and s) and express the dependent variables (x, y, and z) in terms of the free variables. The general solution is:

x = -132t - s

y = 4t - 2s

z = t

where t and s can take any real values.

(b) If we have a vector b in R^4 such that Ba = b is inconsistent, it means that there is no solution to the system of equations represented by Bx = b. We can check this by substituting values into Ba and verifying if it equals b. If there is no such vector b, then the system is consistent.

Learn more about equations here  :brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The line integral of vector field K over the given boundary is computed as ∫₀²π cos²(t)sin(t)dt. Applying Stokes' Theorem, the surface integral simplifies to 0.



To compute the line integral of K·dr, where dr is a differential vector along the curve C, we need to parameterize C. From the given equation x² + y² = 2z = 0, we can parameterize C as r(t) = (cos(t), sin(t), 0) for t in [0, 2π]. Evaluating K at r(t), we have K(cos(t), sin(t), 0) = (0, -cos(t)sin(t), 0), and dr = (-sin(t), cos(t), 0)dt. Therefore, the line integral becomes ∫₀²π (0, -cos(t)sin(t), 0)·(-sin(t), cos(t), 0)dt = ∫₀²π cos²(t)sin(t)dt. We can evaluate this integral to get the final result.

To use Stokes' Theorem, we need to find the curl of K. Taking the curl of K, we get curl(K) = (0, -z², -x). Now, applying Stokes' Theorem, the surface integral of curl(K)·dS over the surface S bounded by C is equal to the line integral of K·dr along C. Since the given surface S is a plane z = 0 with the normal vector ez = (0, 0, 1), the surface integral simplifies to ∫₀²π (0, -cos(t)sin(t), 0)·(0, 0, 1)dt = ∫₀²π 0dt = 0. Therefore, the result using Stokes' Theorem is also 0.

To learn more about vector click here

brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

The measure of center that is less sensitive to specific data values than the mean is the trimmed mean. It provides a robust estimate of central tendency.

The trimmed mean is a statistical measure of central tendency that reduces the impact of extreme values on the calculation of the average. It achieves this by trimming a certain percentage of data from both ends of the distribution before calculating the mean.

This method is useful when there are outliers or skewed data points that can heavily influence the mean. By trimming off extreme values, the trimmed mean provides a more stable and reliable measure of central tendency that better represents the typical value of the data.

The trimmed mean is calculated by removing a certain percentage of data from both ends of the distribution and then calculating the mean of the remaining values.

This trimming process reduces the impact of outliers and extreme values on the resulting measure of central tendency. For example, a 10% trimmed mean would remove the highest and lowest 10% of the data, while a 25% trimmed mean would remove the highest and lowest 25% of the data.

Learn more about Robust

brainly.com/question/31329417

#SPJ11

The data does not suggest that the true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breastfeeding by more than 25g.

1. Hypotheses:

  - Null hypothesis (H0): The true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning is not more than 25g higher than during breastfeeding.

  - Alternative hypothesis (H1): The true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during breastfeeding by more than 25g.

2. Test statistic and significance level:

  - We will use a t-test to compare the means of the two groups.

  - The significance level is given as 0.05.

3. Calculate the test statistic:

  - Subtract the bone mineral content during breastfeeding (B) from the bone mineral content during postweaning (P) for each subject.

  - Calculate the mean difference and standard deviation of the differences.

  - Compute the t-test statistic using the formula: t = (mean difference - 25) / (standard deviation / √n), where n is the number of observations.

4. Degrees of freedom (df):

  - The degrees of freedom for this test is equal to the number of observations minus 1.

5. P-value:

  - Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value associated with the obtained test statistic and degrees of freedom.

6. Decision:

  - Compare the P-value to the significance level.

  - If the P-value is less than the significance level (0.05), reject the null hypothesis.

  - If the P-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

In this case, the conclusion is based on the calculated P-value. If the P-value is less than 0.05, we would reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning does exceed that during breastfeeding by more than 25g. If the P-value is greater than or equal to 0.05, we would fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the average bone mineral content during postweaning is significantly higher than during breastfeeding by more than 25g.

Learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

1. the relative frequency for those who took exactly 1 time to pass the deep-water test is 3/5 or 0.600

2. it means that for each additional credit a student takes, the number of hours they study per week is expected to increase by 2.25.

1. To determine the relative frequency for those who took exactly 1 time to pass the deep-water test, we need to calculate the ratio of the frequency of 1 time to the total frequency.

The total frequency is given by the sum of all frequencies:

Total frequency = 21 + 8 + 6 = 35

The relative frequency for those who took exactly 1 time can be calculated as:

Relative frequency = Frequency of 1 time / Total frequency = 21 / 35

Simplifying the fraction, we have:

Relative frequency = 3 / 5

Therefore, the relative frequency for those who took exactly 1 time to pass the deep-water test is 3/5 or 0.600 (rounded to 3 decimal places).

2. The given linear regression equation is:

Study = 0.75 + 2.25 Credits

The slope of the equation is 2.25.

Interpreting the slope in the context of the equation, it means that for each additional credit a student takes, the number of hours they study per week is expected to increase by 2.25. In other words, the slope indicates the average increase in study hours associated with each additional credit taken by the student.

Learn more about relative frequency here

https://brainly.com/question/28342015

#SPJ4

Answer =

a) SSW equals 108.

b) MSA equals 36.

c) MSW equals 9.

d) FSTAT is 4.

To answer these questions, we need to understand the concepts of Sum of Squares (SS), Mean Square (MS), and the F-statistic.

a. SSW (Sum of Squares Within) represents the within-group variation. To calculate it, we subtract the Sum of Squares Among (SSA) from the Total Sum of Squares (SST).

SSW = SST - SSA

SSW = 288 - 180

SSW = 108

Therefore, SSW equals 108.

b. MSA (Mean Square Among) represents the mean square for the among-group variation. To calculate it, we divide the Sum of Squares Among (SSA) by its corresponding degrees of freedom.

MSA = SSA / degrees of freedom among

MSA = 180 / 5

MSA = 36

Therefore, MSA equals 36.

c. MSW (Mean Square Within) represents the mean square for the within-group variation. To calculate it, we divide the Sum of Squares Within (SSW) by its corresponding degrees of freedom.

MSW = SSW / degrees of freedom within

MSW = 108 / 12

MSW = 9

Therefore, MSW equals 9.

d. The F-statistic (FSTAT) is the ratio of the Mean Square Among (MSA) to the Mean Square Within (MSW). It is used to test the significance of the group differences.

FSTAT = MSA / MSW

FSTAT = 36 / 9

FSTAT = 4

Therefore, the value of FSTAT is 4.

Learn more about Group variation, click;

https://brainly.com/question/32065760

#SPJ4

Null hypothesis: H0:p1≥p2

Alternative hypothesis: H1:p1

In a random sample of males, it was found that 24 write with their left hands and 207 do not.

In a random sample of females, it was found that 69 write with their left hands and 462 do not.

Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are:

Null hypothesis: H0:p1≥p2

Alternative hypothesis: H1:p1

To know more about Null visit

https://brainly.com/question/24383102

#SPJ11

At a significance level of 0.01, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

To test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females, we need to set up the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1).

p1 = proportion of left-handed males

p2 = proportion of left-handed females

Null hypothesis (H0): p1 ≥ p2 (The rate of left-handedness among males is greater than or equal to that among females)

Alternative hypothesis (H1): p1 < p2 (The rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females)

Now, let's proceed with the steps to test the hypothesis:

(a) Determine the significance level:

The significance level is given as 0.01, which means we will reject the null hypothesis if the probability of observing the sample data, assuming the null hypothesis is true, is less than 0.01.

(b) Calculate the sample proportions:

[tex]\hat p_1[/tex] = Number of left-handed males / Total number of males

= 24 / (24 + 207)

= 24 / 231

≈ 0.1039

[tex]\hat p_2[/tex] = Number of left-handed females / Total number of females

= 69 / (69 + 462)

= 69 / 531

≈ 0.1297

(c) Perform the hypothesis test:

To test the hypothesis, we need to calculate the test statistic and compare it to the critical value.

The test statistic for comparing two proportions is given by:

z = ([tex]\hat p_1[/tex] - [tex]\hat p_2[/tex] ) / √(([tex]\hat p_1[/tex](1-[tex]\hat p_1[/tex]) / n1) + ([tex]\hat p_2[/tex] (1-[tex]\hat p_2[/tex] ) / n₂))

Where:

n1 = Total number of males

n2 = Total number of females

In this case, n1 = 24 + 207 = 231 and n2 = 69 + 462 = 531.

Substituting the values:

z = (0.1039 - 0.1297) / √((0.1039(1-0.1039) / 231) + (0.1297(1-0.1297) / 531))

Calculating z, we get z ≈ -1.766

To find the critical value, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software. For a significance

level of 0.01 (one-tailed test), the critical value is approximately -2.33.

Since the test statistic (z = -1.766) does not exceed the critical value (-2.33), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about significance level, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31070116

#SPJ11

The decision is to reject the null hypothesis (H₀).

To test the bus company's claim, we can set up the following hypotheses:

H₀: μ ≥ 5 (The mean waiting time for a bus during rush hour is greater than or equal to 5 minutes.)

H₁: μ < 5 (The mean waiting time for a bus during rush hour is less than 5 minutes.)

Here, μ represents the population mean waiting time.

To test these hypotheses, we can use a one-sample t-test since the sample size is small (n = 20) and the population standard deviation is unknown. We need to calculate the t-statistic using the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and sample size.

The formula for the t-statistic is:

t = (x- μ) / (s / √n),

where x is the sample mean, μ is the hypothesized population mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values from the problem, we have:

x= 3.7 (sample mean)

s = 2.1 (sample standard deviation)

n = 20 (sample size)

μ = 5 (hypothesized population mean)

Calculating the t-statistic:

t = (3.7 - 5) / (2.1 / √20) ≈ -1.923

Next, we need to determine the critical t-value for a significance level of α = 0.01 and degrees of freedom (df) = n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19. Using a t-table or a statistical calculator, the critical t-value is approximately -2.861.

Since the calculated t-statistic (-1.923) is greater than the critical t-value (-2.861) and falls in the rejection region, we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we have evidence to support the claim that the mean waiting time for a bus during rush hour is less than 5 minutes.

To know more about one-sample t-tests, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32606144#

#SPJ11

The partial sums S2, S4, and S6 of the series 3 + 2² + 3² + 4² + ... are 1, 14, and 55, respectively.

The partial sum of a series is the sum of the first n terms of the series. In this case, we are asked to compute the partial sums of the first 2, 4, and 6 terms of the series.

The first 2 terms of the series are 3 and 2², so S2 = 3 + 2² = 1.

The first 4 terms of the series are 3, 2², 3², and 4², so S4 = 3 + 2² + 3² + 4² = 14.

The first 6 terms of the series are 3, 2², 3², 4², 5², and 6², so S6 = 3 + 2² + 3² + 4² + 5² + 6² = 55.

In general, the partial sum of the first n terms of the series 3 + 2² + 3² + 4² + ... is equal to n(n+1)(2n+1)/6.

Learn more about partial sums here:

brainly.com/question/31900309

#SPJ11

Abdul's probability of making at least three sales out of 20 people spoken to at Best Buy can be calculated using binomial probability.

In the given scenario, Abdul's sales success rate is 30 out of 90 potential customers. This can be simplified to 1 out of every 3 potential customers. Considering he spoke with 20 people, we can calculate the probability of making three or more sales.

Using binomial probability formula, we find the probability of making exactly three sales is:

P(X = 3) = C(20, 3) * (1/3[tex])^3[/tex] * (2/3[tex])^1^7[/tex] ≈ 0.204

Similarly, we can calculate the probability of making four, five, and so on, up to 20 sales, and sum them up to find the probability of making at least three sales.

Learn more about Binomial probability

brainly.com/question/12474772

#SPJ11

The predicted age is not very accurate. Y = 46.2751 - 0.020342 x (Round the y-intercept to one decimal place as needed. Round the slope to three decimal places as needed).

Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable The regression equation (y) is given by:

y = a + bx

where a is the y-intercept, and b is the slope of the line.

The best predicted age of the Best Actor winner given the age of the Best Actress winner that year is 28 years Best Actress Best Actor29 41 2939 2836 44 3152 50 3151 61 4337 52 3064 37 0021 56 4646 45 57 33

Here, Best Actress = x and Best Actor = y,

so Best Actress = 28.

Therefore, we can use the data for Best Actor to find the regression equation.

To find the regression equation using a calculator, we need to find the mean of x and y.

The means are given by:μx = (29 + 39 + 36 + 52 + 31 + 51 + 37 + 64 + 21 + 46 + 57) / 11

= 42.0909μy = (41 + 39 + 36 + 44 + 52 + 50 + 61 + 52 + 37 + 56 + 45 + 33) / 12 = 45.5

We also need to find the sum of squares of x and y.

The sum of squares is given by:Sxx = ∑(xi - μx)2Syy

= ∑(yi - μy)2Sxy

= ∑(xi - μx)(yi - μy)

= 322.5 - (11)(42.0909)(45.5) / 12 = -12.8409

Then, the slope of the regression equation is given by:

b = Sxy / Sxx = -12.8409 / 632.4628

= -0.020342The y-intercept of the regression equation is given by:

a = μy - bμx

= 45.5 - (-0.020342)(42.0909

) = 46.2751

Therefore, the regression equation is:

y = 46.2751 - 0.020342x

Using x = 28 in the regression equation :y = 46.2751 - 0.020342(28) = 45.7329

This value is not within 5 years of the actual Best Actor winner, whose age was 36 years.

To know more about decimal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33109985

#SPJ11

In the regression equation: y= 20 - 34x, the value of 20 represents the Intercept and -34 represents the Coefficient of the independent variable.

A linear regression equation can be express as a statical model which is used to find the specific relationship between anticipating variable and outcome variable regression equation has an equation of the form Y = a + bX, where a is  Intercept and b is coefficient.

Regression equation Y = a + bX.

Given equation y= 20 - 34x.

If we compare both equation then we find a = 20 and b = -34, where 20 is intercept and -34 is coefficient.

Therefore, In the regression equation: y= 20 - 34x, the value of 20 represents the Intercept and -34 represents the of the coefficient independent variable.

Learn more about regression equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30738733

#SPJ4

By using binomial distribution and formula, the probability of the indicated event (a) P(17 ≤ X ≤ 20) = 0.3040 (b) P(12 < X < 15) = 0.4675.

a) Given, the distribution is binomial X ~ B(n=22, p=0.8).

Let, X1= 17 and X2 = 20. Therefore, P(17 ≤ X ≤ 20) = P(X = 17) + P(X = 18) + P(X = 19) + P(X = 20).

By using binomial formula, P(X=k) = 22Ck (0.8)^k (0.2)^(22-k).

Thus, P(X=17) = 22C17 (0.8)^17 (0.2)^5

P(X=18) = 22C18 (0.8)^18 (0.2)^4  

P(X=19) = 22C19 (0.8)^19 (0.2)^3

P(X=20) = 22C20 (0.8)^20 (0.2)^2.

By putting the values, we get P(17 ≤ X ≤ 20) = 0.0040 + 0.0212 + 0.0784 + 0.2003.

The probability of the event, P(17 ≤ X ≤ 20) = 0.3039 ≈ 0.3040.

Therefore, P(17 ≤ X ≤ 20) = 0.3040

b) Given, the distribution is binomial X ~ B(n=21, p=0.6)

Let, X1= 12 and X2 = 15. Therefore, P(12 < X < 15) = P(X = 13) + P(X = 14)

By using binomial formula, P(X=k) = 21Ck (0.6)^k (0.4)^(21-k).

Thus, P(X=13) = 21C13 (0.6)^13 (0.4)^8

P(X=14) = 21C14 (0.6)^14 (0.4^)7.

By putting the values, we get P(12 < X < 15) = 0.1657 + 0.3018

The probability of the event, P(12 < X < 15) = 0.4675 ≈ 0.4675 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Therefore, P(12 < X < 15) = 0.4675

Learn more about Binomial Distribution :

https://brainly.com/question/29163389

#SPJ11

The series [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}}$[/tex] is convergent.

Given series: [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}}$[/tex]

The series [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}}$[/tex] can be tested for convergence or divergence using the comparison test.

To use the comparison test, we will compare the given series with another series whose convergence or divergence is known to us.

Using the limit comparison test, let's test the given series for convergence or divergence.

Limit Comparison Test:

Let b_n be a positive series.

If [tex]$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = L > 0,$[/tex]

where L is a finite number, then either both series

[tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$ and $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex]

converge or both diverge.

We can write the given series as follows:

[tex]$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}} = 10 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}}$$[/tex]

We need to find the equivalent lower bound of [tex]$4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}.$[/tex]

Let's simplify the series to make it easier to handle.

We can write,

[tex]$$4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n} = \sqrt{n} \left[ 4 + 5 n^{-\frac{1}{6}} \right]$$[/tex]

Now, it is easier to choose an equivalent series. We choose,

[tex]$$b_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$$[/tex]

Therefore, we have,

[tex]$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}} \cdot \sqrt{n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{10}{4 + 5 n^{-\frac{1}{6}}} = \frac{10}{4} = \frac{5}{2} > 0$$[/tex]

Hence, the series [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{10}{4 \sqrt{n}+5 \sqrt[3]{n}}$[/tex] is convergent.

Learn more about comparison test visit:

brainly.com/question/30761693

#SPJ11

To find the acceleration vector r(t), we need to take the second derivative of the vector-valued function r(t). Since r(t) = (1, 1, 1/t), the first derivative is r'(t) = (0, 0, -1/t²).

Taking the derivative again, we get the acceleration vector r''(t) = (0, 0, 2/t³). Substituting t = 1 into r''(t), we have r''(1) = (0, 0, 2/1³) = (0, 0, 2). (b) To find the unit normal vector N(t), we need to normalize the derivative vector r'(t). At t = 1, r'(1) = (0, 0, -1/1²) = (0, 0, -1). To normalize this vector, we divide it by its magnitude: N(1) = r'(1)/||r'(1)|| = (0, 0, -1)/√(0² + 0² + (-1)²) = (0, 0, -1). (e) To find the projection of "(1) in the direction of N(1) at t = 1, we can use the dot product. The projection is given by projN("(1)) = ("(1)·N(1)) * N(1). Since "(1) = (1, 0, 0), we have "(1)·N(1) = (1, 0, 0)·(0, 0, -1) = 0. Therefore, the projection is 0 * N(1) = (0, 0, 0).

In summary, at t = 1, the acceleration vector r''(t) is (0, 0, 2), the unit normal vector N(t) is (0, 0, -1), and the projection of "(1) in the direction of N(1) is (0, 0, 0).

To learn more about vector click here: brainly.com/question/24256726

#SPJ11

The probability that the mean weight is less than 6.14 ounces is given as follows:

The mean and the standard deviation for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]\mu = 6.17, \sigma = 0.12[/tex]

The standard error for the sample of 28 is given as follows:

[tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]s = \frac{0.12}{\sqrt{28}}[/tex]

s = 0.0227.

The z-score for a measure X is given as follows:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

The probability that the mean weight is less than 6.14 ounces is the p-value of Z when X = 6.14, hence it is given as follows:

Z = (6.14 - 6.17)/0.0227

Z = -1.32

Z = -1.32 has a p-value of 0.0934.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25800303

#SPJ4

The rate at which the side of the cube changes when its length is 1 m is ____2/3____ m/sec .

Let's denote the side length of the cube as 's' and the volume as 'V'. We are given that dV/dt = 2 m³/sec, which represents the rate of change of the volume with respect to time. We need to find ds/dt, the rate at which the side length changes.

The volume of a cube is given by V = s³. Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to time, we have dV/dt = 3s²(ds/dt). Substituting dV/dt = 2 and the given side length of 1 m, we can solve for ds/dt.

2 = 3(1)²(ds/dt)

2 = 3(ds/dt)

ds/dt = 2/3 m/sec.

Therefore, the rate at which the side of the cube changes when its length is 1 m is 2/3 m/sec.

To know more about rate of change here: brainly.com/question/29181688

#SPJ11

The probability of exactly 4 successes is 0.244 (rounded to three decimal places).

Given data: A random variable follows a binomial distribution with a probability of success equal to 0.72.

For a sample size of n = 8.

To find: a. the probability of exactly 4 successes

We need to use the binomial probability formula for this. The formula is:

P (x = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

Where, C(n, k) is the number of combinations of n things taken k at a time. p is the probability of success.

k is the number of successes, n is the total number of trials. Now let's put the given values in the formula. We have:

P (x = 4) = C(8, 4) * 0.72^4 * (1 - 0.72)^(8 - 4) Using a calculator,                    we get: P (x = 4) ≈ 0.244

So, the probability of exactly 4 successes is 0.244 (rounded to three decimal places).

Learn more about probability  visit:

brainly.com/question/12474772

#SPJ11

The given Cauchy-Euler equation is t²y'' - 6ty' + 10y = 0. To find the general solution, we can assume a solution of the form y(t) = t^r, where r is a constant.

Substituting this into the differential equation, we can solve for the values of r that satisfy the equation. The general solution will then be expressed as y(t) = c₁t^r₁ + c₂t^r₂, where c₁ and c₂ are arbitrary constants and r₁ and r₂ are the solutions of the equation. Next, we can use the given initial conditions to determine the specific values of the constants c₁ and c₂ and obtain the solution that satisfies the initial conditions.

To find the general solution to the Cauchy-Euler equation t²y'' - 6ty' + 10y = 0, we assume a solution of the form y(t) = t^r. Taking the first and second derivatives of y(t), we have y' = rt^(r-1) and y'' = r(r-1)t^(r-2). Substituting these into the differential equation, we get r(r-1)t^r - 6rt^r + 10t^r = 0. Factoring out t^r, we have t^r(r^2 - 7r + 10) = 0.

Since t^r cannot be zero, we solve the quadratic equation r^2 - 7r + 10 = 0. The solutions are r₁ = 5 and r₂ = 2. Therefore, the general solution to the Cauchy-Euler equation is y(t) = c₁t^5 + c₂t^2, where c₁ and c₂ are arbitrary constants.

To find the solution that satisfies the initial conditions y(1) = -2 and y'(1) = 7, we substitute these values into the general solution.

y(1) = c₁(1^5) + c₂(1^2) = c₁ + c₂ = -2

y'(1) = 5c₁(1^4) + 2c₂(1^1) = 5c₁ + 2c₂ = 7

We now have a system of two equations with two unknowns (c₁ and c₂). Solving this system of equations will yield the specific values of c₁ and c₂, giving us the solution that satisfies the initial conditions.

To learn more about derivatives click here:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = sin(25) cos(x5) can be written as shown below:

f(x) = [sin(25)] [cos(0)] + [25 cos(25)] [(-5x⁵) / 1!] + [(-625 sin(25))] [(25x¹⁰) / 2!] + ... + [(-9765625 cos(25))] [(-5x¹⁵) / 3!]

The first four non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series for f(x) = sin(25) cos(x5) are:

First term = [sin(25)] [cos(0)] = sin(25)

Second term = [25 cos(25)] [(-5x⁵) / 1!] = -125x⁵ cos(25)

Third term = [(-625 sin(25))] [(25x¹⁰) / 2!] = -781250x¹⁰ sin(25)

Fourth term = [(-9765625 cos(25))] [(-5x¹⁵) / 3!] = 2716064453125x¹⁵ cos(25)

Therefore, the first four non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series for f(x) = sin(25) cos(x5) are sin(25), -125x⁵ cos(25), -781250x¹⁰ sin(25), and 2716064453125x¹⁵ cos(25).

Conclusion:Thus, the first four non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series for f(x) = sin(25) cos(x5) are sin(25), -125x⁵ cos(25), -781250x¹⁰ sin(25), and 2716064453125x¹⁵ cos(25).

Explanation:The Maclaurin series is a specific type of Taylor series that is created when x is equal to 0. The formula for a Maclaurin series is given below:f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x/1! + f''(0)x²/2! + f'''(0)x³/3! +...Where f'(0), f''(0), f'''(0), and so on denote the derivatives of the function evaluated at x = 0.

To know more about Maclaurin series visit:

brainly.com/question/32263336

#SPJ11

The value of v is approximately 158.3%.

To determine the value of v in the equation v = u + at, we need to substitute the given values of u, a, and t into the equation and calculate the result.

Given:

u = 2 (initial velocity)

a = -5 (acceleration)

t = 1/12 (time)

Substituting these values into the equation v = u + at:

v = 2 + (-5)(1/12)

To simplify the expression, we multiply -5 and 1/12

v = 2 - 5/12

To combine the fractions, we need to find a common denominator:

v = (2 * 12 - 5) / 12

Simplifying the numerator:

v = (24 - 5) / 12

v = 19 / 12

To convert the fraction into a decimal, we divide 19 by 12:

v ≈ 1.583

To express the answer as a percentage, we multiply the decimal by 100:

v ≈ 158.3%

For more questions on equation

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ8

Answer:

margin of error is plus or minus 3.5%

+or-3.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

44.5%-37.5%=7%

7%÷2

3.5%