All of the following are true about DDay except: D. It forced the German's to fight on two fronts.
What is the DDay?B. It contained amphibious attacks on 7 beaches for one Allies: This is too true. The D-Day encroachment on June 6, 1944 contained amphibious assaults on five beaches in Normandy, France: Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno, and Sword.
Lastly, in terms of option C. It contained British, American and Canadian Soldiers: This is valid. The D-Day invasion was a cooperation for one Allied forces, and soldiers from the United States, Britain, and Canada were all complicated.
Learn more about DDay from
https://brainly.com/question/16529260
#SPJ1
when the u.s. supreme court invalidated a virginia statute prohibiting interracial marriages in the 1967 case, it asserted its power to
The U.S. supreme court invalidated a Virginia statute prohibiting interracial marriages in the 1967 case, it asserted its power to review state actions.
The Court will interpret the Constitution and overturn state legislation that infringe fundamental constitutional rights. Judicial review is the ability of a country's courts to analyze the activities of the legislative, executive, and administrative branches of government and determine whether such actions are in accordance with the constitution. Inconsistent actions are ruled unlawful and so null and void. In this sense, the institution of judicial review is dependent on the presence of a written constitution.
The traditional definition of judicial review could be more accurately described as "constitutional review," because there has long been a practise of judicial review of administrative agency actions that do not require that courts have the power to declare those actions unconstitutional or that the country have a written constitution.
To learn more about review state actions:
https://brainly.com/question/19359533
#SPJ4
under the leadership of pericles, the athenians undertook the costly project of reconstructing the acropolis after the persian sack of 480 bce. the funds for the building campaign came from the ...
Under leadership of pericles, the athenians undertook the costly project of reconstructing the acropolis after the persian sack of 480 bce. the funds for the building campaign came from the Delian League
The Acropolis was devastated during the Persian sack of Athens in 480 BCE, and the city launched an ambitious building programme to restore it under the reign of Pericles, a well-known statesman and commander in ancient Athens. The Parthenon, one of Athens' most well-known structures, was situated on the Acropolis, a hill.
The Delian League, a union of Greek city-states created during the Persian Wars to fortify against new Persian invasions, was used by Pericles to raise the money for the pricey project. Under Pericles' direction, Athens became the leading city-state in the Delian League, ultimately transforming it into an Athenian Empire.
Read more about Delian League on:
https://brainly.com/question/348378
#SPJ4
In rain myths which conclusion about the Madagascan people is most justified by A Madagascan Myth
A Madagascan Myth is a story that explains the origin of rain in Madagascar. The myth tells of a time when the people of Madagascar were suffering from a drought, and how a young boy named Ralambo was able to bring rain to the land through his bravery and sacrifice.
Based on this myth, one conclusion that can be drawn about the Madagascan people is their deep connection and respect for nature.
The story portrays the people as being dependent on the rain for their survival and highlights the devastating effects of drought. It also shows their willingness to make sacrifices for the greater good of their community, as demonstrated by Ralambo's sacrifice.
Overall, the Madagascan people in this myth are depicted as a community that values courage, selflessness, and their connection to the natural world.
Learn more about Madagascan Myth here:
https://brainly.com/question/29346012
#SPJ1
Amateurs: Who was the amateur filmmaker whose only famous work was sold by his heirs in 1999, almost 36 years after its creation, for $16 million?
The amateur filmmaker whose only famous work was sold by his heirs in 1999 for $16 million was named Martin Manulis.
The amateur filmmaker in question is the Frenchman Georges Méliès. Méliès was a pioneer in the early days of cinema and is known for his innovative use of special effects in his films, including the first ever science fiction film, "A Trip to the Moon" (1902). Méliès' films were hugely influential in the development of film as an art form, but unfortunately, he fell out of favor with audiences and went bankrupt in the 1910s. After his death in 1938, his heirs discovered a large collection of his films, including "A Trip to the Moon", which was subsequently restored and re-released to great acclaim. In 1999, a hand-painted print of the film was sold at auction for $16 million.
~~~Harsha~~~
I need help with these questions
Which of the following is NOT a legislative provision found in the USA Patriot Act?
A. Updated laws to take into account new technology, including the Internet
B.Authorized local police departments to arrest and detain citizens indefinitely prior to filing charges
C. Improved information-sharing capabilities among different federal, state, and local agencies
D. Increased penalties for terrorist activities and the crimes most likely to be committed by terrorists
The statement that is NOT a legislative provision found in the USA Patriot Act is: B. Authorized local police departments to arrest and detain citizens indefinitely prior to filing charges.
Which is NOT a legislative provision found in the USA Patriot Act?After the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, the USA Patriot Act was passed into federal law in the US. It aimed to improve the capacity of the government to stop and deal with acts of terrorism.
Option B, which asserts that the USA Patriot Act gave local police departments permission to keep citizens in custody without charge for an extended period of time, is untrue because there is no such authorization in the act.
Learn more about USA Patriot Act here:https://brainly.com/question/30951094
#SPJ1
what was the primary reason parliament passed taxes on colonial goods and how did the colonists respond?
The primary reason Parliament passed taxes on colonial goods was to raise revenue for the British government, especially to pay off debts from the French and Indian War. The colonists responded with protests, boycotts, and eventually, the American Revolution.
Parliament passed taxes on colonial goods was to generate revenue for Great Britain and to exert its control over the colonies. The British government needed money to pay for the costly Seven Years' War and believed that the American colonies should help pay for it since they directly benefited from British protection. This led to the passage of several acts, including the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts, which levied taxes on various colonial goods.
The colonists were angered by these taxes because they believed that they were being unfairly treated and that they should not be taxed without representation in the British Parliament. They began to organize protests and boycotts against British goods, which ultimately led to the Boston Tea Party and the start of the American Revolution. The colonists also formed groups such as the Sons of Liberty to oppose British rule and promote colonial rights. The conflict over taxes on colonial goods was a major factor in the growing tension between Britain and the colonies that ultimately led to the American Revolution.
After the French and Indian War, the British government found itself in significant debt. To address this, Parliament sought to raise revenue by passing taxes on colonial goods, such as the Sugar Act (1764), Stamp Act (1765), and Townshend Acts (1767). These taxes targeted items like sugar, molasses, printed materials, and various imports.
The colonists reacted strongly against these taxes, as they believed they were being unfairly taxed without representation in the British government. This led to protests, boycotts of British goods, and the development of the Sons of Liberty and other organizations to coordinate resistance efforts. The situation eventually escalated into armed conflict, culminating in the American Revolution and the eventual independence of the United States.
Learn more about American Revolution: https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ11
Karol entered the seminary at the age of _______.
Karol Józef Wojtyła, who later became Pope John Paul II, entered the seminary at the age of 18.
In 1938, Karol enrolled in the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland, to study Polish literature and philosophy. However, due to the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the university was closed, and Karol began working in a quarry to avoid being deported to Germany. In 1942, he secretly joined an underground seminary run by the Archbishop of Kraków.
Throughout his time at the seminary, Karol continued to work in the quarry and later in a chemical factory, while studying theology and preparing for the priesthood. He was ordained as a priest on November 1, 1946, and later went on to become the first non-Italian pope in over 450 years, serving from 1978 until his death in 2005.
Learn more about World War II:
https://brainly.com/question/11378857
#SPJ11
5. What sort of impact do you think a trade war would have on the
economies of other nations? How do you think a trade war might
affect our nation's relationships with other nations?
Explanation:
A trade war can have significant negative impacts on the economies of other nations, particularly those that are heavily reliant on international trade. If a major trading partner, such as the United States, imposes tariffs or other trade barriers on imported goods from other countries, it can lead to reduced demand for those goods and ultimately hurt the exporting country's economy.
In addition to the direct economic impacts, a trade war can also strain relationships between countries. Other nations may view trade barriers as unfair or protectionist, leading to diplomatic tensions and potentially retaliatory actions. This can have broader geopolitical consequences, as trade is often a key component of international relationships and can be used as a tool for exerting influence or resolving conflicts.
In the case of the United States, a trade war could strain relationships with key trading partners and potentially damage its reputation as a reliable global partner. This could have longer-term consequences beyond the immediate economic impacts, potentially leading to reduced diplomatic and strategic influence on the global stage.
historians who are troubled by the impact of political corruption on the democratic process will have no sympathy for richard nixon because
Historians who are troubled by the impact of political corruption on the democratic process will have no sympathy for Richard Nixon because he was involved in one of the most notorious political scandals in American history.
The Watergate scandal, which occurred during Nixon's presidency, involved the illegal activities of Nixon's re-election campaign, including the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate complex. Nixon's involvement in the cover-up of these illegal activities and his attempts to obstruct justice by withholding evidence and tapes from the investigation led to his eventual resignation from the presidency. This scandal not only damaged Nixon's reputation, but it also eroded public trust in the government and democratic institutions.
Furthermore, Nixon's administration was known for its use of dirty tricks and illegal tactics to discredit political opponents and gain an advantage in elections. This behavior is antithetical to the principles of democracy and fair elections, and historians who value these principles will find it difficult to sympathize with Nixon and his actions. Historians who study the democratic process are concerned with ensuring that elections are fair, free, and transparent. They are concerned with protecting the rights of voters and ensuring that all voices are heard in the political process. Political corruption undermines these principles and threatens the very foundation of democracy.
To know more about American History visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21425542
#SPJ11
The artist André Breton issued a manifesto that described the point of "resolution between these two states, dream and reality." What was this movement?
The movement that André Breton's manifesto was referring to is Surrealism. This artistic and literary movement originated in Paris in the 1920s and aimed to bridge the gap between the conscious and unconscious minds by tapping into the power of dreams and the imagination.
Breton's manifesto, titled "The Surrealist Manifesto," outlined the principles of the movement, which included an emphasis on automatic writing, free association, and the use of chance and randomness in creating art. Surrealist artists sought to create works that were not bound by the constraints of logic or reason, but instead, captured the elusive, dreamlike quality of the subconscious mind. Surrealism quickly gained popularity in the art world and had a significant influence on artists, writers, and thinkers throughout the 20th century.
he movement's legacy continues to this day, with many contemporary artists drawing inspiration from its principles. This movement marked a significant departure from traditional artistic styles and paved the way for new forms of expression that continue to evolve and inspire artists around the world. This movement emphasized automatic writing, free association, and the use of chance and randomness in creating art. Surrealist artists sought to create works that captured the elusive, dreamlike quality of the subconscious mind. Surrealism quickly gained popularity and influenced artists, writers, and thinkers throughout the 20th century, leaving a lasting legacy that continues to inspire contemporary artists.
To know more about Surrealism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11545469
#SPJ11
in 1949, truman was able to get congress to pass a national health insurance program. true false question. true false
The given statement: in 1949, Truman was able to get Congress to pass a national health insurance program is FALSE.
In 1949, President Truman proposed a national health insurance program, but it was never passed by Congress. While Truman did make significant efforts to promote national health insurance, including delivering a speech to Congress on the topic in 1945, he was ultimately unable to secure passage of such a program during his presidency.
It wasn't until 1965, during the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, that Congress passed Medicare and Medicaid, which provided health insurance coverage to elderly and low-income Americans.
Despite Truman's efforts, it took several more decades for the United States to establish a comprehensive national health insurance program, which it still does not have to this day.
To know more about national health insurance program, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28589777#
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer from each drop down menu. Companies under ____ market structures are independent. ____ is a secret agreement around companies that may result from this independence.
first blank choices :monopolist , monopolistically competitive, oligopolistic, perfectly competitive
Second blank:a cartel, collusion , a price war, a trade union
Answer:
Companies under perfectly competitive market structures are independent. Collusion is a secret agreement around companies that may result from this independence.
Explanation:
Market structures refer to the different types of markets that exist, characterized by different levels of competition, the number of firms, and the degree of control they have over pricing. The four main market structures are monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition, and perfect competition.
When it comes to independent companies, they operate under a perfectly competitive market structure. In such a market, there are many independent firms that offer identical products or services, and none of them have significant market power or control over prices. As a result, prices are determined by supply and demand, and firms must compete solely on price, quality, and customer service to attract customers.
One potential outcome of this independence is collusion, which is a secret agreement between firms to coordinate their actions and achieve a shared outcome. In this case, the second blank is correctly filled with "collusion." Collusion can result in anticompetitive behavior, such as price-fixing, and can lead to higher prices for consumers and decreased competition in the market. Another example of anticompetitive behavior resulting from collusion is a cartel, which is a group of firms that act together to restrict output and increase prices.
~~~Harsha~~~
why do the dogs accompany squealer when he goes to the other animals?
The dogs accompanying Squealer when he goes to the other animals serve as a symbol of fear and intimidation.
Squealer uses them to remind the animals of their powerlessness, and to threaten them into compliance. The dogs are a reminder of the consequences of disobedience, and a warning to the animals that any misbehavior will be met with swift and brutal punishment.
By having the dogs accompany him, Squealer is able to control the situation and ensure that the animals will do as he says. The presence of the dogs helps to ensure that the other animals understand that they have no choice but to obey.
To know more about animals , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27959941
#SPJ1
Nixon said he had executive privilege (right of the President to withhold information
the public) to keep the secret tapes for himself. Do you agree with this? Explain
Answer:
Executive privilege is a doctrine that allows the President of the United States to withhold information from the public or other branches of government to protect the confidentiality of executive communications. While it is not explicitly stated in the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has recognized it as an implied power of the executive branch.
In the case of Nixon and the secret tapes, the President argued that he had the right to withhold the tapes as they contained confidential and sensitive information that could impact national security. However, this argument was challenged, and the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that executive privilege does not extend to cover evidence relevant to criminal proceedings. Therefore, Nixon was ordered to release the tapes, and they ultimately led to his resignation.
While executive privilege can be an important tool for the President to protect sensitive information, it should not be used to obstruct justice or prevent transparency and accountability. Ultimately, it is up to the courts to determine the scope and limitations of executive privilege in each case.
Explanation:
president biden approved an enormous $8 billion plan to extract 600 million barrels of oil from pristine federal land in __________________.
President Biden approved an enormous $8 billion plan to extract 600 million barrels of oil from pristine federal land in Alaska.
President Biden has approved a controversial plan to extract 600 million barrels of oil from federal land. The plan, which is estimated to cost $8 billion, has been met with opposition from environmentalists who argue that drilling in pristine areas could have severe consequences for the environment. Despite these concerns, the government has approved the project, stating that it will help to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil and create jobs in the energy sector. However, the long-term impact of such a project on the environment remains to be seen.
President Biden's administration has given the green light for a significant $8 billion project aimed at extracting around 600 million barrels of oil from pristine federal land located in Alaska. This decision reflects the government's commitment to balancing environmental concerns with the need to meet the country's energy demands and generate economic opportunities.
Learn more about economic opportunities: https://brainly.com/question/30824302
#SPJ11
You may not know this, but you are home to a colony of bacteria. You may also not know it, but the health and happiness of that colony of bacteria have a direct effect on your own health and happiness. In short, if we are what we eat, then we may need to make bacteria part of our balanced breakfast. Microbes are single-celled organisms. They are literally everywhere. Microbes are in the air we breathe, on the surfaces of everything we touch, and inside our bodies. Microbes can be bacteria, fungi, protozoa, or viruses. A few years ago, scientists began studying the microbial life of our stomachs. Called The American Gut project, this study aims to understand the life of the bacteria that live in our digestive system. According to an article in the New York Times by Michael Pollan, the goal is to gather information on the types and amounts of bacteria in the human gut. Scientists want to describe what a normal healthy microbe and human relationship should look like inside our digestive system. While the research is still in the very early stages, scientists have learned the following: The strongest and healthiest microbe systems are those with a lot of variety. The guts of Americans have much less variety than the guts of other populations. Diets that include a lot of processed foods support less variation in bacteria. Studying the makeup of our individual bacteria communities will help scientists get a better idea of which bacteria help human bodies. We used to think that bacteria in our bodies were invaders. This new research suggests that bacteria are part of the protective army that keeps us healthy. In fact, our bodies have a hard time recovering from medicines like antibiotics because they disrupt the balance of helpful bacteria. It seems clear from the early evidence that living with bacteria helps us resist invasion from things that make us sick. Scientists have also learned that microbes might help our guts do things like process vitamins and important nutrients. Some microbes may help u
A collection of bacteria that share a mother cell are referred to as a bacterial colony. Accordingly, a single mother cell multiplies to produce a group of genetically identical cells, and this group of cells eventually forms a mass that is referred to as a bacterial colony.
In the context of development, colonies might consist of two or more unitary (or solitary) organisms or be modular organisms. Unitary organisms have definite development (defined life stages) from the zygote to mother cell the adult form, and individuals or groups of individuals (colonies) are visually different.
It can be challenging to bacterial colony discern between the colony as a whole and the individual modules since modular organisms[3] have uncertain growth forms, In the latter scenario, modules might have certain roles inside the colony.
Learn more about bacterial colony, from :
brainly.com/question/6168872
#SPJ1
"When giving their life jackets, Robbi Goode did not call out for a Jew; Father Washington eek out a Catholic; nor did the Reverends Fox and Poling call for a Protestant. They simply gave their life jackets to the next man in line."
What was the author's purpose of including the sentence above? -- from some article titled, "The Four Immortal Chaplains of the SS Dorchester" that my World History teacher, Mrs. Hales, had picked out and printed for us( and by us, I mean the rest of my classmates and I for the last lesson of the day today).
The author's purpose of including the sentence above was to highlight the selflessness and bravery of the Four Immortal Chaplains of the SS Dorchester.
The Four Immortal Chaplains of the SS Dorchester were four chaplains of different religious backgrounds who gave up their own life jackets to save others when the ship was torpedoed by a German submarine during World War II. The author of the passage is using the sentence to emphasize that the chaplains did not discriminate based on religion when they gave away their life jackets. Instead, they acted in a selfless and compassionate manner, helping whoever was in need without regard for their religious affiliation.
By including this sentence, the author is demonstrating the chaplains' commitment to their duty as clergymen and their belief in the value of human life, regardless of religion or nationality. The sentence serves to illustrate the chaplains' heroic actions and their dedication to their principles, making their sacrifice all the more powerful and inspiring.
To know more about Dorchester, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28698505
#SPJ1
for about two decades, 10% of all u.s. electricity came from which source?
The answer to the question is that for about two decades, 10% of all U.S. electricity came from nuclear power.
However, a more detailed answer would explain that this percentage varied slightly over time and that other sources, such as coal and natural gas, have also contributed significant amounts of electricity to the U.S. grid. Additionally, there has been a recent shift towards renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, which are expected to play a larger role in the U.S. electricity mix in the coming years.
Nuclear power has been a significant source of electricity in the United States since the 1970s. Over the past two decades, it has consistently contributed to around 10% of the total electricity generation in the country. This is mainly because of the efficiency, reliability, and relatively low greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear power plants.
Learn more about nuclear power: https://brainly.com/question/18769119
#SPJ11
In 1832, the US Supreme Court heard the case of Worcester v. Georgia , which involved Native American nations. In this case, the Supreme Court
A: Upheld the sovereignty of tribal governments
B: defended the authority of state governments
C: Ruled that states and tribal governments have concurrent powers
its not C!!
The Supreme Court defended the right of tribal governments to exercise their own sovereignty in Worcester v. Georgia. Option (A) is the correct response, thus.
In the matter of Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1832, by a vote of 5 to 1, concluding that the states lacked the authority to place restrictions on Native American land.
The native's case was appealed, and in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court heard the issue. The Court determined that the Cherokee Nation was "a unique political community" on which Georgia law had no bearing. This made the Georgia statute unconstitutional.
So, the correct response is option (A).
Learn more about Worcester v. Georgia, from:
brainly.com/question/22800339
#SPJ1
beginning in the 1940s, the u.s. congress set up the ____________________ to hear cases regarding whether the government had not met its treaty obligations to indigenous tribes.
Beginning in the 1940s, the u.s. congress set up the Indian Claims Commission (ICC) to hear cases regarding whether the government had not met its treaty obligations to indigenous tribes.
The ICC was established to provide a forum for tribes to seek compensation for lands and resources that were taken from them without their consent.
The ICC operated until 1978 when it was replaced by the U.S. Court of Claims and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The ICC played an important role in addressing historic injustices against indigenous peoples and in providing a means for tribes to seek redress for their grievances.
Read more about Indian Claims Commission at brainly.com/question/13037087
#SPJ11
1.1.5 Quiz: Radical Reconstruction
Question 1 of 10
Which political figure was a leader of the Radical Republicans in congress?
OA. Preston Brooks
OB. Abraham Lincoln
O c. Thaddeus Stevens
O D. Andrew Johnson
SUBM
Thaddeus Stevens was a prominent political figure and a leader of the Radical Republicans in Congress during the era of Radical Reconstruction. Option C.
Born in 1792, Stevens served as a member of the United States House of Representatives from Pennsylvania. He was known for his fierce opposition to slavery and his commitment to racial equality and civil rights.
As a Radical Republican, Stevens played a crucial role in shaping the post-Civil War policies aimed at reconstructing the South and ensuring the rights of newly freed slaves. He advocated for strict measures against the former Confederate states, including the passing of the Reconstruction Acts of 1867, which imposed military rule and required states to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment.
Stevens has a staunch supporter of equal rights for African Americans and fought for their enfranchisement and land redistribution as a means to achieve economic independence. He was a vocal critic of President Andrew Johnson's more lenient approach to Reconstruction and often clashed with him over policy.
Thaddeus Stevens' leadership and advocacy for radical measures during the Reconstruction era made him one of the most influential figures in the fight for racial equality and the reshaping of the United States in the aftermath of the Civil War.
Option C.
For more questions on Thaddeus Stevens visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29051885
#SPJ8
Who was the person who Jesus told to lead the Israelites out of Egypt
how did congress respond to the sinking of the ship chesapeake in june 1807?
In response to the sinking of the ship Chesapeake in June 1807, Congress passed the Embargo Act of 1807, which prohibited American ships from trading with foreign countries.
The sinking of the Chesapeake, an American naval vessel, by the British ship HMS Leopard was a significant provocation for the United States in the lead-up to the War of 1812.
In response, President Thomas Jefferson pushed for the passage of the Embargo Act of 1807, which was designed to cripple British and French trade by prohibiting American ships from trading with any foreign country.
The Embargo Act had significant economic and political consequences, as it led to a sharp decline in American trade and a wave of smuggling and illegal trade. The Act was deeply unpopular, particularly in New England, where merchants and shipowners were hit hard by the loss of trade. Ultimately, the Embargo Act was repealed in 1809 and replaced with a more limited embargo that allowed trade with some countries.
The sinking of the Chesapeake and the subsequent passage of the Embargo Act illustrate the complex and fraught relationship between the United States, Britain, and France in the early 19th century, and the challenges faced by American policymakers as they tried to navigate a rapidly changing international landscape.
To know more about Chesapeake, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/5231025#
#SPJ11
describe the situation with the lusitania. why did the use of the german u-boat eventually pull the u.s. into wwi?
Answer:
They were scared of the U.S.
Explanation:
So, as you probably know, at the beginning of WW1 the U.S. was neutral between the allied and central powers, but Germany didn't want the U.S. to grow too powerful, so they sank the Lusitania, and it sank in 18 minutes. This involved The U.S., and they beat the central powers. Hope this helps!
The Lusitania was a British passenger ship that was sunk by a German U-boat in 1915, killing over 1,100 people, including 128 Americans. The use of unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany, which violated American neutrality and threatened American lives, eventually led to the United States' entry into World War I.
The sinking of the Lusitania was a major turning point in World War I. The ship was carrying American passengers, as well as munitions and supplies for the British war effort. The German government had warned Americans not to travel on British ships, but many ignored the warning.
On May 7, 1915, a German U-boat torpedoed the Lusitania off the coast of Ireland, causing it to sink in just 18 minutes. Over 1,100 people died, including 128 Americans. The sinking outraged the American public and sparked calls for retaliation against Germany.
President Woodrow Wilson initially pursued a policy of neutrality, but the use of unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany eventually led the United States to declare war on Germany in April 1917.
To know more about American neutrality, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19306279#
#SPJ11
European nations in the nineteenth century had an economic incentive to colonize Africa because of —
the vast natural resources available
a need for strategic military outposts
the wealthy markets for European goods
a desire to expand the Atlantic slavery trade
European nations in the nineteenth century had an economic incentive to colonize Africa because of the vast natural resources available.
The African continent was rich in natural resources such as diamonds, gold, ivory, and rubber, which European nations sought to exploit for their economic gains. These resources were essential in powering the Industrial Revolution, and European nations were keen to secure a steady supply of them to maintain their economic growth. Additionally, the colonization of Africa provided an opportunity for European nations to establish profitable trade relationships with African states and create new markets for their goods. Therefore, economic incentives were the driving force behind the colonization of Africa by European nations.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution: https://brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ11
Can u please help me
For Americans, the advantages of international trade are numerous. It brings down the price and broadens the selection of our consumer purchases.
Both those who produce exports and those who use imports as crucial inputs in their job are benefited by it. It supports economic growth, competition, and innovation. Additionally, it supports the development of global collaborations, which are essential for tackling issues with global policy.
Trade, however, has dangers. The United States tends to specialise in goods that heavily utilise these essential resources since we are a nation with abundant capital and a highly educated population. That is why we export sophisticated goods like software, aircraft, and Hollywood productions. Nevertheless, we import goods that decrease the need for our less-educated labor because of low-wage countries.
Learn more about international trade here:
https://brainly.com/question/20492108
#SPJ1
which president admitted the us should not have detained japanese americans during wwii and awarded them reparations?
President Ronald Reagan admitted the US should not have detained Japanese Americans during WWII and awarded them reparations in 1988.
During World War II, the US government detained over 100,000 Japanese Americans in internment camps, citing national security concerns. Decades later, in 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act which provided reparations to surviving Japanese American internees and their families.
In his remarks during the signing ceremony, Reagan acknowledged the "grave injustices" committed against Japanese Americans during the war and apologized on behalf of the US government.
He stated that the internment was a "mistake" and "not justified," recognizing the harm and trauma that the experience caused. The Civil Liberties Act provided monetary compensation and an official apology to Japanese American internees, marking a significant moment of recognition and reconciliation for this dark chapter in American history.
For more questions like World War II click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/12233146
#SPJ4
janet protasiewicz, a liberal judge in wisconsin, won an election with major implications for abortion rights. what position was she running for?
Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal judge in Wisconsin, won an election with major implications for abortion rights. She was running for the position of Circuit Court Judge.
By winning this election, she may have an impact on future cases related to abortion rights, as Circuit Court Judges play a significant role in interpreting and applying state laws, including those concerning reproductive rights. Her victory suggests that she may be supportive of protecting and expanding access to abortion services in her jurisdiction, which could have a lasting effect on the legal landscape surrounding this issue in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in Wisconsin, meaning that it hears cases that have already been decided in lower courts and may be appealed. The outcome of these cases will have a significant impact on the availability of abortion in the state. Protasiewicz's election is seen as a victory for advocates of reproductive rights, as she is expected to rule in favor of abortion access.
To know more about Circuit Court Judge visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17923303
#SPJ11
How did the economic problems of the 1930's affect foreign policy?
As equities fell further in the early 1930s, businesses collapsed and unemployment increased.
By 1932, one out of every four laborers was out of employment. Banks failed, and many Americans lost their life savings, leaving them homeless. Thousands of Americans lost their houses because they had no employment and no money. In many regions of the world, economic instability has led to political instability.
Political turmoil spawned dictatorial regimes such as Adolf Hitler's in Germany and the military's in Japan. Between the start of the Great Depression and the bottom four years later, the US economy shrunk by one-third. Between 1929 and 1933, real GDP decreased by 29%. In 1933, the unemployment rate peaked at 25%.
Learn more about economic problems here:
https://brainly.com/question/441267
HELP ASAP!!!
1- What was the Missouri Compromise? Be sure to include the states (Missouri and Maine), territory and Compromise Line in your explanation.
2- What was the Compromise of 1850? Include the three states (California, Utah, and New Mexico) involved and the decision about slavery in Washington D.C..
3-Explain the Supreme Court ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. Be sure to include all parts of the case including the Chief Justice.
4-Explain the significance (importance) of the Battles of Antietam Creek, Gettysburg, and Vicksburg.
5-Explain the importance of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments.
Thank you so so so much if you help!!
1. The Missouri Compromise was a law passed by Congress in 1820 that allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state and Maine to enter as a free state. Additionally, it established a line of latitude (the 36° 30' parallel) that would divide future states into either slave or free states. Any state north of the line would be free, while any state south of the line would be allowed to permit slavery.
2. The Compromise of 1850 was a law passed by Congress that settled several disputes between Northern and Southern states. It allowed California to enter the Union as a free state and organized territories of New Mexico and Utah with no mention of slavery. Additionally, it included a decision about slavery in Washington D.C. that permitted it but outlawed the slave trade within the district.
3. The Supreme Court ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case was a decision made by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney in 1857 that stated slaves were not U.S. citizens and therefore had no right to bring a case to court. Additionally, the ruling declared that Congress could not prohibit slavery in any territory, effectively invalidating the Missouri Compromise and making slavery legal in all states.
4. The Battle of Antietam Creek was an important battle fought in 1862 during the Civil War. It was significant because it was the bloodiest single day of battle in American history, with over 22,000 casualties. The Union victory also led to Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that all slaves in Confederate-held territory were free. The Battle of Gettysburg, fought in 1863, was another important Union victory that marked a turning point in the war. It led to General Lee's retreat from Union territory and prevented the Confederacy from further invading the North. The Battle of Vicksburg, also in 1863, was an important Union victory that gave them control of the Mississippi River, splitting the Confederacy and allowing for more successful operations in the West.
5. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were all important additions to the U.S. Constitution that addressed issues of slavery, citizenship, and voting rights. The 13th Amendment, ratified in 1865, abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in America. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to all born or naturalized in the U.S. The 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race, color, or previous servitude. These amendments were significant in creating a more equal and just society for African Americans, and lays down the foundation for the Civil Rights Movement of the 20th century.
