1. In the beginning of the book, Elie Wiesel was a curious and deeply religious twelve-year-old, unique for his desire to study the Talmud and other Jewish mysticism teachings and his close bond with his family, especially his father.
2. Moishe the Beadle was a poor and humble Jewish man who worked in the Hasidic synagogue. He was very poor, but he was full of faith and an incredible source of inspiration for Elie. He was characterized as "poor" and "awkward," but his eyes shone with the goodness of his heart. He also had a very important message to share about his experience with the Nazis that affected Elie deeply.
Moishe the Beadle was a poor and humble Jewish man who worked in the Hasidic synagogue. When Elie first met him, he was characterized as "poor" and "awkward," but his eyes shone with the goodness of his heart. Moishe was an incredibly inspiring figure to Elie and became his tutor in the Kabbalah. Moishe also had a very important message to share with the Jews of Sighet about his experience with the Nazis, which would have a profound effect on Elie.
However, after the Nazi invasion of Sighet, Moishe was deported with other foreign Jews, but he managed to escape and return to warn the Jews of Sighet about the dangers they faced. Despite his best efforts, he was not believed, and he became a silent witness to the horrors of the Nazi occupation. Moishe's change was due to his experience as a captive of the Nazis, and it was his responsibility to warn the Jews of Sighet.
To know more about the Elie Wiesel visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11065948
#SPJ11
Which key issue did the Great Compromise resolve? a. whether to tax exports b. slavery in the United States c. how to elect the President d. representation for the states
The Great Compromise resolved the issue of representation for the states.The Great Compromise was a crucial turning point in the Constitutional Convention, as it resolved the contentious issue of representation.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, played a crucial role in the formation of the United States Constitution in 1787. One of the main issues that needed resolution during the Constitutional Convention was how to determine representation in the legislative branch. The larger states advocated for representation based on population, while the smaller states preferred equal representation for each state.
In the first step towards resolving this issue, the Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature consisting of two separate chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives would have representation based on the population of each state, satisfying the larger states. On the other hand, the Senate would provide equal representation for each state, appeasing the smaller states. This compromise struck a balance between the two opposing views and created a system that would endure over time.
The House of Representatives, with its representation based on population, would ensure that the larger states had a significant say in legislative matters. Meanwhile, the Senate, with two senators per state regardless of size, would give the smaller states an equal voice. This compromise recognized the importance of both population and state sovereignty in the formation of laws and policies.
Learn more about Great Compromise
brainly.com/question/30338373
#SPJ11
a reason the united states was able to acqire florida in the adams onis treaty was that it agreed to give up claims on
The Adams-Onis Treaty, also known as the Transcontinental Treaty, was signed in 1819, and it was an agreement between the United States and Spain. This agreement settled border disputes between the two nations and resolved some long-standing issues.
A reason the United States was able to acquire Florida in the Adams-Onis Treaty was that it agreed to give up claims on the Texas region beyond the Sabine River.
The Adams-Onis Treaty or the Transcontinental Treaty is also known as the Florida Treaty. The Adams-Onis Treaty, which was signed on February 22, 1819, was an agreement between the United States and Spain that settled numerous longstanding disputes between the two nations.
The treaty established the border between the two nations and established the United States' claim to the Oregon Country. Spain, on the other hand, was granted control over Texas, which was not yet a state.
In addition, the treaty settled a long-standing border dispute over Louisiana. It's a great example of peaceful negotiations. The treaty was beneficial to both nations because it allowed the United States to gain control of Florida while also enabling Spain to maintain control of Texas.
Learn more about Adams-Onis Treaty: brainly.com/question/19983754
#SPJ11
The Adams-Onis Treaty was signed in 1819 and settled a boundary dispute between the United States and Spain.
The treaty resulted in the transfer of Florida from Spain to the United States and established a definitive boundary between Spanish-held Mexico and the United States, which extended all the way to the Pacific Ocean. The treaty was beneficial to the United States because it not only gave the country possession of Florida but also ended a long-standing border dispute. The United States was able to acquire Florida in the Adams-Onis Treaty, in part, because it agreed to give up claims on Texas.The U.S. government was interested in acquiring Florida because it had become a refuge for runaway slaves and raiding Indians who threatened American settlements in Georgia and Alabama. In addition, Florida was strategically important because it served as a base from which the Spanish could stage attacks on American shipping and frontier settlements. The United States had attempted to acquire Florida through military action but was unsuccessful. The Adams-Onis Treaty was therefore seen as a diplomatic solution to the problem of securing American borders and preventing further conflicts with Spain.
To know more about dispute visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/27705637
#SPJ11
how did americans contribute to the allied war effort in europe? select all that apply. the united states shipped vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to britain and the soviet union.
Americans contributed to the Allied war effort in Europe by shipping vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to Britain and the Soviet Union. Option a is correct.
This support was provided through programs like the Lend-Lease Act, which allowed the United States to provide aid to its allies without direct payment. The U.S. sent crucial supplies, including weapons, vehicles, food, and fuel, to bolster the war efforts of Britain and the Soviet Union.
Additionally, American troops played a significant role in the European theater by participating in major military campaigns, such as the D-Day invasion of Normandy in 1944. Through these combined efforts, the United States played a crucial role in supporting the Allies and ultimately contributing to the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
Therefore, a is correct.
Learn more about Allied war effort https://brainly.com/question/18350483
#SPJ11
The United States provided vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to Britain and the Soviet Union during World War II to contribute to the Allied war effort in Europe.
This answer is supported by the fact that the US was a key supplier of weapons and materials to the Allies during the war.There are also several other ways in which Americans contributed to the Allied war effort in Europe. Here are some of them:- The US provided troops, with American soldiers fighting alongside British and Soviet troops.- The US provided financial aid to the Allies, with the Lend-Lease program providing billions of dollars worth of aid to Britain and the Soviet Union.- The US provided intelligence and code-breaking support, which helped the Allies to gain an advantage over Axis forces.- The US played a key role in the D-Day landings, providing a large number of troops and equipment for the invasion of Normandy.- The US contributed to the air war in Europe, with American pilots flying missions over Germany and other parts of occupied Europe.To summarize, Americans contributed to the Allied war effort in Europe by providing troops, weapons, supplies, financial aid, intelligence, code-breaking support, and air power. The US played a key role in the Allied victory in World War II by helping to defeat Nazi Germany and its allies.
To know more about weaponry visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/18533925
#SPJ11
What led to the end of Salutary Neglect? (choose all that apply)
1. British dominance in North America
2. a need for the British to reorganize a larger empire for more effective management
3. the end of the French and Indian War
The end of the French and Indian War and the need for the British to reorganize a larger empire for more effective management led to the end of Salutary Neglect.
Salutary Neglect refers to the British policy of not strictly enforcing colonial laws in America during the 17th and 18th centuries. This policy was intended to maintain economic loyalty between Britain and its colonies. However, the end of the French and Indian War and the need for the British to reorganize a larger empire for more effective management led to the end of Salutary Neglect. The war had been expensive, and the British believed that the colonies should bear some of the cost of maintaining the empire. Therefore, the British began to enforce trade laws more strictly and began to tax the colonies to generate revenue.
In conclusion, the end of the French and Indian War led to a change in British policy towards the colonies, which marked the end of Salutary Neglect. The British sought to reorganize their empire and gain more revenue from the colonies, leading to increased enforcement of trade laws and new taxes.
To know more about the Indian War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7037989
#SPJ11
explain one important difference between the silk road and the trans-saharan trade routes.
One important difference between the Silk Road and the Trans-Saharan trade routes is that the Silk Road connected China and the Mediterranean region.
The Silk Road and the Trans-Saharan trade routes were two of the most significant trade routes in the ancient world. The Silk Road connected China and the Mediterranean region, while the Trans-Saharan trade routes connected West Africa and North Africa. One of the major differences between the two trade routes was the nature of the goods that were traded. The Silk Road was known for the trade of luxury goods such as silk, spices, and precious metals, while the Trans-Saharan trade routes were used to trade gold, ivory, and salt.
Another significant difference was the mode of transportation used. In the Silk Road, traders used camels, horses, and donkeys, while in the Trans-Saharan trade routes, traders used caravans of camels. The distance traveled in the Trans-Saharan trade routes was much greater than that in the Silk Road. The Silk Road was approximately 4,000 miles long, while the Trans-Saharan trade routes were more than 3,000 miles long. The Silk Road was also used for the spread of culture and religion, while the Trans-Saharan trade routes were not as significant in this regard.
To know more about the Trans-Saharan trade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1544977
#SPJ11
Which description best explains the domain of (g o f)(x)?
A. ) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined
B. ) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero
C. ) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined
D. ) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero
Let f(x) and g(x) be two functions, then the domain of (g o f)(x) is defined as the set of all x-values that make the function (g o f)(x) defined. So, (g o f)(x) = g(f(x)).This means that the function f(x) is applied first to x and then the result of f(x) is used as the input for the function g(x).
Let's explain the options:
A) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined B) the elements in the domain of f(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero C) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined D) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not zero.
As per the definition, (g o f)(x) is only defined if the input of g(x) from f(x) is defined. Therefore, the answer is (C) the elements in the domain of g(x) for which g(f(x)) is not undefined. So, in order to find the domain of (g o f)(x), you have to look for the values of x which will make g(f(x)) defined.
To know more about domain visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29452843
#SPJ11
i am a 17th century painter from spain. i painted the piece above. i am mostly known for my portraits. who am i? (1 point) a.diego velázquez b.francisco de goya c.miguel de cervantes d.pablo picasso
The correct answer is A. Diego Velázquez.
Diego Velázquez, a 17th-century Spanish painter, is known for his portraits and was particularly renowned for his ability to capture the essence of his subjects with great precision.
How is the 17th-century Spanish painter known for his portraits?Diego Velázquez was a renowned 17th-century Spanish painter, known for his exceptional skill in portraiture. Born in 1599, he became the court painter for King Philip IV of Spain, which granted him access to paint influential individuals of his time.
Velázquez's mastery lies in his ability to capture the essence and personality of his subjects with remarkable precision. His most famous work, "Las Meninas," showcases his technical expertise and innovative composition. Velázquez's use of light and shadow, along with his attention to detail, set him apart as a leading figure in Spanish Baroque art.
His influence extends beyond his era, inspiring generations of artists who followed in his footsteps.
Learn more about:Spanish painter,
brainly.com/question/32369901
#SPJ11
What was Joan of Arc's contribution?
Her defeat of the English at Orleans contributed to French victory in the Hundred Years' War.
She became queen after marrying Charles VII.
She used messages from visions to convince Charles VII to convert to Roman Catholicism.
She led an invasion of England.
Joan of Arc's contribution to history can be summarized by Her defeat of the English at Orleans contributed to the French victory in the Hundred Years' War.
Joan of Arc, also known as the Maid of Orleans, was a remarkable figure who played a pivotal role in the Hundred Years' War between France and England during the 15th century. At the age of 17, Joan of Arc claimed to have received divine visions instructing her to support the French dauphin, Charles VII, and aid him in reclaiming the French throne from English control.
With unwavering determination and conviction, Joan convinced Charles VII to grant her an army and lead the French forces against the English. One of Joan's most significant military achievements came in 1429 when she successfully lifted the siege of Orleans, a key city in France. Her strategic leadership and inspirational presence on the battlefield boosted the morale of the French troops, leading to their victory over the English forces.
This triumph was a turning point in the war, as it not only boosted French morale but also weakened English control in France. Joan's military successes continued as she participated in several other important battles, including the Battle of Patay. However, her efforts were not without controversy and eventually led to her capture by the English.
She was accused of heresy and witchcraft and subjected to a politically motivated trial, which resulted in her execution by burning at the stake in 1431. Despite her tragic end, Joan of Arc's contributions had a lasting impact on the outcome of the Hundred Years' War.
know more about Orleans here:
https://brainly.com/question/1775702
#SPJ8
The Marshall Plan benefited the United States as well as Western Europe because _____.
a. It strengthened alliances and partnerships
b. It promoted economic growth and stability
c. It countered the influence of communism
d. All of the above
The Marshall Plan benefited the United States as well as Western Europe because it strengthened alliances and partnerships, promoted economic growth and stability, and countered the influence of communism (D. all of the above).
The Marshall Plan was initiated by the United States to help Europe recover from the devastation of World War II. It provided $13 billion in aid to Western European countries between 1948 and 1952.
The plan helped to rebuild Western Europe's economy, which had been devastated by the war. This helped to create new markets for American goods, and it helped to prevent the spread of communism in Europe. The plan also strengthened alliances and partnerships between the United States and European countries. This allowed the United States to maintain its influence in Europe and to help promote democracy and freedom.
The Marshall Plan was a win-win situation for both the United States and Western Europe. The plan helped to rebuild Europe, which in turn helped to create new markets for American goods. It also helped to prevent the spread of communism in Europe, which was a major concern for the United States at the time. Finally, the plan helped to strengthen alliances and partnerships between the United States and European countries, which allowed the United States to maintain its influence in Europe and to help promote democracy and freedom.
The correct answer is Option D.
Learn more about Marshall Plan here: https://brainly.com/question/14482727
#SPJ11
The Marshall Plan benefited the United States as well as Western Europe because it strengthened alliances and partnerships, promoted economic growth and stability, and countered the influence of communism.
The plan aimed to rebuild the economies of Western European countries after the devastating effects of World War II. The United States provided around $13 billion in economic assistance to Western Europe from 1948-1951.The primary objective of the Marshall Plan was to prevent the spread of communism and promote democracy in Europe. The plan had several benefits for the United States and Western Europe. First, it helped rebuild the economies of Western Europe, which improved trade relations and strengthened alliances between the US and Europe. The plan helped establish a robust economic base in Western Europe that would provide the foundation for future prosperity.Secondly, the plan helped promote economic growth and stability in the region. The US provided economic assistance to Western Europe to help them purchase American goods. This led to an increase in trade, which improved economic conditions in Europe and created new markets for American goods. The plan helped to stimulate economic growth, which led to increased prosperity and stability in the region.Finally, the plan helped counter the influence of communism in Europe. By providing economic assistance to Western European countries, the US was able to prevent the spread of communism in the region. The Marshall Plan was successful in this regard as it provided the economic stability and prosperity needed to prevent the spread of communism in Europe. Therefore, the answer to the question is option d. All of the above.
To know more about communism visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30017938
#SPJ11
The principles of joint operations are formed around the traditional principles of war. Three additional principles―restraint, perseverance, and legitimacy―are relevant to how the Armed Forces of the United States use combat power across the range of military operations. These three, added to the original nine, comprise 12 principles of joint operations.
The principles of joint operations are formed around the traditional principles of war, and restraint, perseverance, and legitimacy are three additional principles that are relevant to the use of combat power by the Armed Forces of the United States across the range of military operations.
These three principles, along with the original nine, constitute the 12 principles of joint operations. The traditional principles of war, such as objective, offensive, mass, economy of force, maneuver, unity of command, security, surprise, and simplicity, provide a foundation for guiding military planning and execution to achieve mission success. Restraint emphasizes the importance of employing appropriate and proportional force, minimizing collateral damage, and avoiding unnecessary harm to non-combatants. Perseverance underscores the need to maintain effort and resolve in the face of adversity and challenges. Legitimacy highlights the adherence to laws, rules of engagement, and ethical standards, ensuring that military operations are conducted lawfully and ethically.
By incorporating these three additional principles, the Armed Forces of the United States aim to conduct military operations with a greater emphasis on minimizing harm, sustaining resilience, and upholding moral and legal standards in their actions across various military operations.
To know more about collateral damage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14316060
#SPJ11
gold was declared as the formal reserve asset in the jamaica agreement of 1976. T/F
The statement "Gold was declared as the formal reserve asset in the Jamaica Agreement of 1976" is false because the Jamaica Agreement of 1976 eliminated the use of gold as a reserve asset.
This agreement allowed the countries to use any of their assets including their national currency, special drawing rights, and foreign exchange reserves to buy and sell currencies instead of using gold.
The agreement was signed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the member countries of the IMF, and it aimed to stabilize the international monetary system. The Jamaica Agreement also allowed member countries to adopt flexible exchange rates instead of fixed exchange rates which led to a more flexible and stable global economy.
Learn more about Jamaica agreement https://brainly.com/question/16016450
#SPJ11
True, gold was declared as the formal reserve asset in the Jamaica Agreement of 1976. In the Jamaica Agreement of 1976, gold was declared as the formal reserve asset, making it a reserve currency.
Jamaica was chosen as the location for the international conference because it was where the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were headquartered at the time. After World War II, the US dollar became the world's reserve currency due to the Bretton Woods agreement, which established the US dollar's value in relation to gold.Gold was widely used as a medium of exchange until the 20th century. The US dollar, on the other hand, became the world's reserve currency after World War II. However, in 1976, the world's central banks decided that gold should be restored to its former role as a reserve asset. As a result, they signed the Jamaica Agreement, which declared gold as the official reserve asset.
To know more about Jamaica Agreement visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/32761917
#SPJ11
How does the rule-making process work? Can citizens be involved?
Where are the final rules published?
The rule-making process is complex, guided by the APA. Agencies must follow procedures to create regulations that align with congressional intent before final rules are published.
The rule-making process involves a series of steps that an agency must follow to create a new regulation. The following are the basic steps involved in the rule-making process:
Pre-Rule Making Activities: During this stage, agencies conduct research and assess the need for a new regulation. They may also seek public input and consult with stakeholders.Proposed Rule: Once the agency has determined that a new regulation is needed, it must publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register. This notice contains the proposed rule and invites the public to submit comments.Comment Period: After the proposed rule is published, the agency opens a comment period, which allows the public to submit comments on the proposed rule. The length of the comment period varies depending on the complexity of the rule and the agency.Final Rule: After considering the public's comments, the agency issues a final rule, which is published in the Federal Register. The final rule specifies the regulation's requirements and how they will be enforced.Citizens involvement in the rule-making processYes, citizens can participate in the rule-making process. During the comment period, the public is invited to submit comments on the proposed rule. The agency considers these comments when creating the final rule.
Additionally, some agencies hold public hearings to allow interested parties to provide comments in person. Interested parties may also file a petition asking the agency to initiate a rule-making process.
Once the final rules are created, they are published in the Federal Register. The Federal Register is the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents.
Learn more about The rule: brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
The rule-making process is the method by which federal agencies develop, amend, and revoke rules that have the force of law. A rule is defined as an agency statement of general or specific applicability and future effect that describes or imposes legal obligations on one or more parties, including the agency that issues the rule.
An agency must adhere to a particular rule-making process in order to create or modify a regulation, including making its proposals public and soliciting input from the public before finalizing the rule.The rule-making process begins when a federal agency determines a need for a new rule or revises an existing one. The agency will conduct an initial analysis and public notice of the rule, explaining why the regulation is necessary and requesting public comments on the proposed action. If the regulation is considered controversial, the agency may conduct public hearings or consider more comments. The agency will then issue a final rule after reviewing and evaluating the comments and feedback it has received. In most cases, citizens can engage in the rule-making process by participating in public comment periods, which provide the public with an opportunity to voice their opinions and suggest modifications to proposed rules. Public comment periods are generally open for a specified length of time, such as 30 to 60 days. Public comments may be submitted electronically, in writing, or in person at a public hearing.Final rules are typically published in the Federal Register, which is a daily publication that provides access to notices, proposed regulations, and final regulations from federal agencies. Agencies must follow the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requirements to publish final rules. Final rules have the force of law once published in the Federal Register, and violations can be enforced by federal agencies.
To know more about amend visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
What is the difference between tinker vs. des moines and morse vs. frederick?
The main difference between Tinker v. Des Moines and Morse v. Frederick is that the former established that students do have some First Amendment rights in schools, while the latter established that school officials can limit student speech when it promotes drug use.
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Morse v. Frederick (2007) were both Supreme Court cases that dealt with student rights to free speech in public schools. The main difference between the two cases is the outcome. In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court established that students do have some First Amendment rights in schools. The case involved students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school suspended the students, but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students, stating that students don't lose their constitutional rights when they step onto school property.
In Morse v. Frederick, the Supreme Court ruled that school officials can limit student speech when it promotes drug use. The case involved a student who held up a banner that said "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" during a school-sponsored event. The school suspended the student, and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school, stating that schools have an interest in preventing drug use among students.
To know more about the Supreme Court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13943015
#SPJ11
what speakers interest for the north from lincoln's second inaugural address
In Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, the speaker's interest in the North was to reunite with the Southern states.
In Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, he mainly focused on the reunification of the United States after the end of the American Civil War. The speaker was interested in reconciliation and moving forward as a united country. He expressed his hope for the future by calling for "malice toward none, with charity for all" and emphasizing the importance of forgiveness and unity.
In terms of the North specifically, Lincoln acknowledged the role that they played in the war and their sacrifices. He also recognized that they may have been motivated by a desire to end slavery, but he cautioned against seeking revenge or retribution against the South. Instead, he urged both the North and the South to work together to create a stronger and more just nation. Overall, Lincoln's main interest in the North was to promote healing and reconciliation between the North and the South.
To know more about the Abraham Lincoln's visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13360257
#SPJ11
the piece of land that provided the feudal vassal's economic support was the?
The piece of land that provided the feudal vassal's economic support was the manor.
In the feudal system, the economic support of a vassal, who was a subordinate noble or knight, was primarily derived from a piece of land known as a manor. The manor was a self-sufficient estate that encompassed various resources necessary for sustaining the vassal's livelihood and fulfilling their obligations to their lord.
The manor typically consisted of agricultural land, forests, pastures, and other natural resources. The vassal and their serfs, who were peasants bound to the land, worked together to cultivate the fields, tend to livestock, and engage in other forms of agricultural activities. The produce generated from the manor, such as crops, livestock, and goods, formed the economic backbone of the vassal's income and sustenance.
Additionally, the manor often included other structures essential for the vassal's economic support. These structures could include a manor house, where the vassal resided, as well as mills, workshops, and other facilities that facilitated the production and processing of goods. The vassal could collect rents and taxes from the serfs living on the manor, further contributing to their economic resources.
Overall, the manor played a crucial role in providing the feudal vassal with the economic support they needed to sustain their lifestyle and fulfill their feudal obligations. It served as the foundation of their economic power within the feudal system.
Learn more about Economic
brainly.com/question/14355320
#SPJ11
edxplain one example of why nationalism thrived in the period 1750-1900 ap world
Nationalism thrived in the period 1750-1900 due to the rise of shared cultural identity.
Nationalism emerged as a significant force during the period 1750-1900 due to the rise of shared cultural identity among populations. This sense of shared cultural identity was fueled by several factors. Firstly, the spread of Enlightenment ideas emphasized the importance of individual rights, equality, and liberty. These ideas inspired people to develop a stronger sense of self-identity and cultural pride, leading to the rise of nationalism. Secondly, the Industrial Revolution played a crucial role in shaping nationalist sentiments. As societies underwent rapid economic transformations, people increasingly identified with their nation and its achievements, seeing it as a source of progress and power. The growth of urban centers and the development of mass communication technologies, such as newspapers and railways, facilitated the dissemination of nationalist ideologies and fostered a sense of unity among citizens. Lastly, the era was marked by political changes, including the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic Wars. These events sparked a spirit of patriotism and resistance against foreign domination, further strengthening nationalist movements.
Learn more about Nationalism
brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ11
The House and Senate can only send proposed Constitutional amendments to the states for a vote if:____.a. the amendment receives a majority vote. b. the president supports them. c. the amendment receives a two-thirds vote. d. the judiciary branch supports them.
The House and Senate can only send proposed Constitutional amendments to the states for a vote if Option C. the amendment receives a two-thirds vote.
The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land, and it is the cornerstone of the country's federal system of government.
The Constitution outlines the government's powers, establishes its structure, and defines the relationship between the federal government and the states.
Constitutional amendments are proposed by Congress and require a two-thirds majority vote in both the Senate and the House of Representatives to be sent to the states for ratification.
The proposed amendment must be approved by three-quarters of the states, or 38 out of 50, to become part of the Constitution.
Amendments to the Constitution can take many years to pass.
The Bill of Rights, which contains the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was proposed in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
The most recent amendment, the 27th Amendment, which prohibits Congress from increasing or decreasing its salary during the current session, was proposed in 1789 and ratified in 1992.
To conclude, the House and Senate can only send proposed Constitutional amendments to the states for a vote if the amendment receives a two-thirds vote.
Therefore, the correct Option is C. the amendment receives a two-thirds vote.
For more questions on Constitutional
https://brainly.com/question/28339948
#SPJ8
Iberians were convinced they needed to recapture Jerusalem for Christianity in order for___________.
Iberians were convinced they needed to recapture Jerusalem for Christianity in order for regaining their importance, glory and power in Europe.
The Iberian Peninsula is the region located at the southwestern edge of Europe and bounded to the north by the Bay of Biscay and France, to the east and south by the Mediterranean Sea, and to the west and southwest by the Atlantic Ocean and Portugal.During the 8th century, a group of Islamic warriors, the Moors, crossed the Straits of Gibraltar and occupied the region for over 700 years. The period of Islamic occupation came to an end in 1492, when the last Muslim stronghold, Granada, was taken by Christian armies. Although the Christian Reconquista was largely completed by the mid-13th century, Iberians wanted to regain their power, glory, and importance in Europe. The Portuguese expeditions, led by Vasco da Gama, who arrived in India in 1498, opened the way for a massive increase in European trade with Asia.Jerusalem was important for Christians because it had been the capital of the Jewish kingdom, the place where Jesus had been crucified and resurrected, and the site of the Holy Sepulchre. The city had fallen under Muslim control during the Islamic conquests of the 7th century. The idea of capturing the city for Christianity had been proposed many times in the past, and several Christian crusades had attempted to do so between the 11th and 13th centuries. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 was a major factor in the decision to launch a new crusade to recapture Jerusalem, as this was seen as a major threat to Christian Europe.
To know more about Jerusalem visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/1162759
#SPJ11
the alliance among the states that existed from 1776 to 1787 was a
The alliance among the states that existed from 1776 to 1787 was a loose confederation.
What type of union was formed among the states from 1776 to 1787?During the period from 1776 to 1787, the states in the United States formed an alliance known as the Articles of Confederation. This alliance established a loose confederation, where each state retained its sovereignty and independence while delegating limited powers to a central governing body. Under this system, the central government had limited authority and could not enforce its laws or effectively manage national affairs.
The alliance struggled to maintain unity and faced numerous challenges, such as financial instability and difficulties in coordinating efforts among the states. These shortcomings eventually led to the decision to replace the Articles of Confederation with the United States Constitution in 1787, creating a stronger federal government.
Learn more about states
brainly.com/question/28815519
#SPJ11
what does president wilson suggest is the best way to keep peace in the world?
Explanation: Wilson suggested many ways to preserve peace between the nations instead of dealing with one another violently. His 14 points were a list of principles he wanted to use in peace negotiations to end WWI. Although his 14 points as a whole were rejected, they led to the creation of the League of Nations being formed as well as the Treaty of Versailles had a similar component to some of his points.
League of Nations: He created and suggested this plan to the European countries so they would be able to prevent wars diplomatically rather than going head-first into violence. The United States ended up not joining due to the Senate's objection to joining.
Treaty of Versailles: Although not drawing inspiration from all his points it did push for disarmament and ended WWI, again with the United States not signing due to the Senate's refusal to allow a signature of it to happen.
Overall, Wilson wanted every nation to be transparent with each other rather than hiding things to preserve and keep peace globally. With this type of behavior from everyone, he believed this would keep the peace in the world.
President Wilson suggests that the best way to keep peace in the world is by creating a world organization that can prevent aggression by one nation against another.
President Wilson believes that the creation of a world organization that can prevent aggression by one nation against another is the best way to maintain peace in the world. He explains that such an organization would function like a police force, intervening in conflicts between nations and preventing wars from breaking out. He argues that this is necessary because nations cannot be trusted to police themselves, as history has shown that they are prone to aggression and conflict.
President Wilson proposes that this world organization be based on the principle of collective security, which means that all nations would agree to defend each other against any acts of aggression. He believes that this would deter aggressive nations from starting wars, as they would know that they would be facing not just one nation but the entire world. Overall, President Wilson's proposal for a world organization to maintain peace was a radical idea at the time, but it paved the way for the creation of the United Nations after World War II.
To know more about President Wilson visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8975650
#SPJ11
what did presdient tafts administration do that upset teddy roosevelt so much that he decided to run for president in 1912
President Taft's administration upset Teddy Roosevelt by deviating from their progressive platform, pursuing a more conservative agenda, failing to prioritize progressive reforms, implementing protective tariff policies, showing a lack of commitment to conservation, and not aggressively pursuing trust-busting against big corporations.
"How did Taft's administration upset Roosevelt?"President Taft's administration took several actions that upset Teddy Roosevelt and ultimately led him to run for president in 1912. Here are some key points:
1. Progressive policies: Roosevelt, known for his progressive agenda, was disappointed by what he saw as Taft's departure from the progressive platform they had established together. Taft's administration pursued a more conservative approach and did not prioritize the progressive reforms Roosevelt advocated.
2. Tariff and conservation policies: Roosevelt strongly supported the reduction of high tariffs, as he believed they protected special interests and hindered fair competition. Taft's administration, however, pursued a different tariff policy, which Roosevelt viewed as too protective of big business. Additionally, Roosevelt was a staunch conservationist and had established many national parks and protected areas. He criticized Taft for what he saw as a lack of commitment to conservation and accused his administration of favoring business interests over environmental protection.
3. Trust-busting: Roosevelt was known for his aggressive approach to trust-busting, taking on powerful corporations to promote fair competition. However, he became disillusioned with Taft's administration when he perceived a lack of zeal in pursuing antitrust actions against big corporations. Roosevelt felt that Taft was not adequately continuing his trust-busting efforts.
4. Party nomination process: The Republican Party nomination process also played a role in Roosevelt's decision to run. Despite significant popularity and support among Republican voters, Roosevelt felt that the party establishment was biased in favor of Taft. This perception led to a rift within the Republican Party, with Roosevelt's supporters forming the Progressive Party (also known as the Bull Moose Party) and nominating him as their presidential candidate.
Overall, Roosevelt's dissatisfaction with Taft's departure from progressive policies, his conservation efforts, trust-busting, and the Republican Party's nomination process motivated him to run against Taft in the 1912 presidential election.
Learn more about:Taft's administration
brainly.com/question/11797211
#SPJ11
Why did President Woodrow Wilson appoint William Jennings Bryan as his Secretary of State?
Group of answer choices
Bryan was an anti-imperialist and a proponent of world peace.
Wilson wanted the Populist vote.
Bryan favored entry into World War One.
Bryan opposed free silver.
President Woodrow Wilson appointed William Jennings Bryan as his Secretary of State primarily because Bryan was an anti-imperialist and a proponent of world peace. Option a is correct.
Wilson recognized Bryan's commitment to global justice and believed that he would be a valuable asset to his administration. Bryan was a strong advocate for the principles of democracy and self-determination and used his position to help shape Wilson's foreign policy agenda.
Despite some disagreements over policy, Bryan remained a dedicated member of the Wilson cabinet until his resignation in 1915 over a disagreement with the president's handling of the Lusitania crisis.
Ultimately, however, Bryan's appointment reflected Wilson's commitment to creating a new world order based on the principles of peace, democracy, and justice.
Therefore, option a is correct.
Learn more about Secretary of State https://brainly.com/question/9764212
#SPJ11
President Woodrow Wilson appointed William Jennings Bryan as his Secretary of State because he was an anti-imperialist and a proponent of world peace.
Wilson considered Bryan to be the most prominent political figure in the United States who advocated for peace rather than war, and believed that he could help promote his vision of global peace.The selection of Bryan was an essential aspect of Wilson's new diplomacy, which aimed to promote peace, stability, and democracy on a global scale. Wilson also chose Bryan because he was a skilled orator and had the ability to express his viewpoints clearly. Bryan had established a reputation as a defender of progressive beliefs, a critic of corporate power, and an advocate for the rights of working people, farmers, and other ordinary citizens.Bryan's selection as Secretary of State was also consistent with Wilson's strategy of incorporating diverse political views within his administration. Wilson's decision to appoint Bryan was not based on Bryan's support for the Populist party, and it was not related to the issue of free silver or entry into World War One. Instead, Wilson believed that Bryan could help promote his vision of a more peaceful and just world, and he considered him to be an invaluable asset to his administration.
To know more about imperialist visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30136308
#SPJ11
1.4. As a responsible South African citizen that uses various forms of Media, provide the theme/focus of 21st March 2023 celebration for human rights day ?
As a responsible South African citizen that uses various forms of media, the theme/focus of 21st March 2023 celebration for human rights day would be "Education as a tool for promoting human rights in South Africa."Education plays a vital role in promoting and protecting human rights, and the government of South Africa has prioritized it as a means of achieving human rights in the country.
The celebration would focus on how education can be used to empower individuals and communities to claim their rights and participate in building a just society that respects and promotes human rights.In South Africa, human rights are often violated due to ignorance and lack of awareness.
Therefore, education can be used to raise awareness and empower people to understand their rights and the role they can play in protecting them.
Through education, individuals can learn about the history of human rights in South Africa, the current human rights issues in the country, and their rights and responsibilities as citizens of South Africa.The 2023 celebration would also focus on the role of media in promoting human rights.
The media plays a vital role in educating and informing people about human rights issues, and it can be used to mobilize people to take action and demand their rights.
The celebration would, therefore, aim to promote the responsible use of media to raise awareness of human rights issues and promote positive change in the country.
To sum up, education is a powerful tool that can be used to promote and protect human rights in South Africa. Therefore, the 2023 celebration for human rights day would focus on education as a tool for promoting human rights in South Africa, and it would also highlight the role of media in promoting human rights.
For more such questions on South African
https://brainly.com/question/27746828
#SPJ8
Outcomes of imperialsm
Imperialism refers to a political ideology and system characterized by the domination and control of one state or nation over another through the use of military, economic, and political power.
Historically, imperialism has led to various outcomes, including economic exploitation, political domination, cultural assimilation, and military subjugation.
Economic exploitation was one of the primary outcomes of imperialism. Imperial powers utilized the resources of their colonies to boost their economic growth.
Colonies provided raw materials and other resources that imperial powers used to produce goods that they sold in their home countries. In turn, colonizers forced their colonies to purchase finished goods, often at inflated prices.
This form of economic exploitation led to a widening of the economic gap between colonizers and colonized nations. Political domination was another outcome of imperialism.
Imperial powers sought to control the political system of their colonies to maintain control over the people. They did this by imposing their political structures and ideologies on their colonies.
This led to the creation of puppet governments, and colonial subjects had no say in their political representation.
For more questions on Imperialism
https://brainly.com/question/377688
#SPJ8
Objectives 1. Investigate images of World War I and World War II. 2. Choose and reflect on an image that catches your attention. 3. Create a short story inspired by that photograph.
World War I and World War II were significant global conflicts characterized by devastating consequences. Notable images include "The Great War" poster, the "Shell Shocked Soldier" photograph, and the "V-J Day in Times Square" picture.
How were World War I and World War II visually represented?Objective 1: Investigate images of World War I and World War II.
World War I and World War II were significant global conflicts that shaped the course of history. Both wars witnessed the use of new technologies and strategies, resulting in devastating consequences for nations and individuals alike. To fulfill your first objective, I will provide you with a brief overview of these wars and suggest some iconic images that you can explore further.
World War I (1914-1918) was a global conflict primarily centered in Europe. It involved many countries and was characterized by trench warfare, chemical weapons, and massive casualties. Some notable images from this period include:
1. "The Great War" by Josiah Wedgwood: A famous poster depicting a soldier holding a rifle and a sword, with the slogan "For King and Country" written below.
2. "Shell Shocked Soldier" by Unknown: A photograph capturing the traumatized expression of a soldier suffering from shell shock, a psychological condition caused by the horrors of war.
3. "The Christmas Truce" by Unknown: An image illustrating the unofficial ceasefire that took place on Christmas Eve in 1914, showing soldiers from opposing sides mingling and playing football in no-man's-land.
World War II (1939-1945) was an even larger conflict, involving more countries and resulting in even greater devastation. It saw the rise of totalitarian regimes, widespread genocide, and the use of atomic weapons. Some iconic images from this era include:
1. "V-J Day in Times Square" by Alfred Eisenstaedt: A photograph capturing the spontaneous celebration in New York City at the announcement of Japan's surrender, symbolizing the end of the war.
2. "The Flag Raising on Iwo Jima" by Joe Rosenthal: A Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph depicting U.S. Marines raising the American flag during the Battle of Iwo Jima, representing the resilience and determination of the Allied forces.
3. "Children of the Warsaw Ghetto" by Unknown: A powerful photograph showing children in the Warsaw Ghetto, highlighting the immense suffering and loss experienced by Jewish communities during the Holocaust.
Learn more about: World War
brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
how does our current culture reflect the issues of reconstruction
Our current culture reflects the issues of Reconstruction in several ways. Racial justice and equality remain prominent and ongoing concerns, mirroring the unresolved challenges from that era.
The discussions surrounding civil rights, systemic racism, and efforts to address historical inequalities demonstrate a continued reflection of the issues faced during Reconstruction. Furthermore, the political landscape and social divisions we experience today can be traced back to the aftermath of the Civil War and the attempts at rebuilding and reunifying the nation during Reconstruction. The debates over states' rights, the role of government, and the power dynamics between different regions and communities continue to resonate in contemporary society. Artistic expressions, such as literature, film, and music, also explore themes of identity, race, and social justice, drawing inspiration from the struggles and legacies of Reconstruction.
In summary, our current culture reflects the enduring influence of Reconstruction through the ongoing pursuit of racial justice, political divisions, and the exploration of related themes in our artistic expressions.
To know more about Reconstruction, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14984233
#SPJ11
the classical period also has been called the enlightenment.
Yes, the classical period has also been referred to as the Enlightenment.The term "Enlightenment" is often used to describe this period of intellectual and cultural transformation.
The classical period, spanning roughly from the mid-18th to early 19th century, is often associated with the rise of the Enlightenment. This intellectual and cultural movement emphasized reason, science, and rationality, and it greatly influenced the arts, literature, philosophy, and political thought of the time. The Enlightenment sought to challenge traditional authority and promote individual freedoms, questioning the authority of the monarchy and the church.
During this period, thinkers such as Voltaire, Rousseau, and Montesquieu advocated for ideals like liberty, equality, and progress. These ideas were echoed in the arts, with composers like Mozart and Haydn embodying the elegance, clarity, and balance associated with the classical period in their music. The classical period also witnessed the development of new literary forms, such as the novel, which explored human nature and social issues in a more realistic and critical manner.
In summary, the classical period and the Enlightenment were closely intertwined, sharing common ideals of reason, progress, and individualism. The term "Enlightenment" is often used to describe this period of intellectual and cultural transformation. Both concepts emphasize the importance of reason, the pursuit of knowledge, and the rejection of traditional authority in favor of individual freedoms.
Learn more about Classical period
brainly.com/question/7296360
#SPJ11
examine how winston and mr charrington's knowledge of london's church exemplifies the party;s approach to reilgiion and history
Winston and Mr. Charrington's knowledge of London's churches in "1984" exemplifies the Party's approach to religion and history as they represent a challenge to the Party's control over alternative belief systems and the narrative of the past.
How do Winston and Mr. Charrington's knowledge of London's churches exemplify the Party's approach?In George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984," Winston Smith and Mr. Charrington's knowledge of London's churches serves as an example of the Party's approach to religion and history. In the totalitarian society depicted in the novel, the Party seeks to control and manipulate every aspect of its citizens' lives, including their beliefs, history, and even their perception of reality.
Firstly, it is important to note that the Party actively suppresses and discourages religious belief. The Party's ideology is centered around the worship of Big Brother, and any form of religious faith that competes with or challenges this devotion is seen as a threat to the Party's power. As a result, organized religion is effectively abolished, and churches are repurposed or demolished.
Winston and Mr. Charrington, however, have knowledge of the existence of churches and the religious practices that took place within them. Winston's memories and Mr. Charrington's antique shop both contain remnants of the past, including religious artifacts and objects associated with Christianity. These relics symbolize the past's connection to individualism, personal spirituality, and an alternative source of authority outside the Party's control.
The Party's approach to religion can be understood in the context of its control over history. The Party manipulates historical records and actively rewrites them to fit its propaganda and ideology. By erasing or distorting the past, the Party aims to eliminate any alternative narratives or ideologies that might challenge its authority. The Party's slogan, "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past," reflects this approach.
The existence of churches, as remembered by Winston and preserved by Mr. Charrington, becomes a challenge to the Party's control over history. These physical remnants serve as a reminder of a different time when religion played a significant role in society. They suggest that there were alternative systems of belief and sources of authority that existed outside the Party's control.
By keeping this knowledge alive, Winston and Mr. Charrington pose a threat to the Party's control over the narrative of history. They represent a small rebellion against the Party's attempt to rewrite and control the past. Their individual memories and artifacts become symbols of resistance and a longing for personal freedom and autonomy.
In conclusion, Winston and Mr. Charrington's knowledge of London's churches exemplifies the Party's approach to religion and history in "1984." The Party seeks to eliminate religious belief and control the narrative of history. The existence of churches and religious artifacts challenges the Party's authority and serves as a reminder of a past that the Party is trying to eradicate. Winston and Mr. Charrington's preservation of this knowledge symbolizes resistance and a longing for personal freedom and autonomy in a society dominated by the Party's control.
Learn more about: London's churches
brainly.com/question/20311745
#SPJ11
what went wrong with boeing b787 lithium ion battery project
The Boeing 787 lithium-ion battery project had several issues, including overheating, fire, and smoke, due to a failure to adequately test the batteries.
Boeing’s B787 lithium-ion battery project was marred by several issues. The first issue was overheating, which caused a fire and smoke. In January 2013, a fire erupted in a Japan Airlines 787 parked at Logan International Airport in Boston, and in February, another Japan Airlines 787 was forced to make an emergency landing in Japan after the pilot noticed smoke in the cockpit and cabin. The second issue was the lack of safety measures for the batteries, which allowed them to overheat and catch fire.
The third issue was the failure to adequately test the batteries before deploying them in the planes, which led to unforeseen consequences and made the battery project a failure. The result of these issues was a grounding of all B787s for several months in 2013 until the battery problems were resolved.
To know more about overheating visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31063172
#SPJ11
how does architecture in the north differ from renaissance architecture in the south (italy)?
Architecture in the north is characterized by its Gothic style, while Renaissance architecture in the south is marked by its classical features.
Architecture in the north of Italy is distinguished from Renaissance architecture in the south by its Gothic style. The Gothic style is characterized by verticality, the use of pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and flying buttresses. Gothic architecture was prevalent in northern Italy from the 12th to the 14th centuries and was particularly common in ecclesiastical architecture such as cathedrals and churches.
In contrast, Renaissance architecture in the south of Italy is marked by its classical features, such as the use of the round arch, the vault, and the dome. Renaissance architects drew on the architecture of ancient Rome and Greece, and as a result, their buildings were characterized by symmetry, proportion, and an emphasis on classical forms. Renaissance architecture was prevalent in Italy from the 15th to the 17th centuries and was particularly common in palaces, churches, and public buildings.
To know more about the Architecture visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4219442
#SPJ11
