Answer: Hello There!.............
Drawing heavily upon her childhood experiences and ethnic heritage Sandra Cisneros creates characters who are distinctly Hispanic and often isolated from mainstream American culture by emphasizing dialogue and sensory imagery over traditional narrative structures. Born: 1954, Chicago.
Explanation:
Hope this helps. Anna ♥
5. What do you think would happen if all citizens refused to follow the responsibilities of
citizens?
civilization would most likely fall apart cus..citizens make up the most of a civilization
Answer:
all of society and then earth itself would collapse into total chaos. it would be glorious.
Explanation:
pew pew
Briefly describe the main ideas of each philosopher of the Enlightenment era
Hobbes:
Locke:
Rousseau:
Montesquieu:
What was the governing relationship between the colonies and the British crown?
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer....
The proprietary colonies were established under charters from the Crown, and the companies appointed the governors. In the Crown colonies the governors were appointed by the King or Queen and were responsible to the monarch for governing the colonists. Whereas royal colonies belonged to the Crown, proprietary and charter colonies were granted by the Crown to private interests. Control over a charter or corporate colony was granted to a joint-stock company, such as the Virginia Company.
Hope it helps!
Brainliest pls!
Follow me! ;)
Answer and Explanation:
Do I assume we are talking American rebellion here , because the British Empire was very, very much larger then a few settlements on the shores of an unexplored and unknown continent. There were an almost infinite number of places throughout the World were there could have been tension between British colonists and whatever local power there was.
Even in America, the actual native peoples , colloquially known as ‘Red Indians’ seem to have been happy with the British Government; at least they signed, and both sides kept, treaties. Very noticeably the Yankees did not honour treaties with the red man. It seems to have been the incomers, the settlers, who were happy not to be British citizens, perhaps because in part they were renegades from home rule in Britain. A similar phenomenon can be observed today in some of the people in Ireland. At least both the British and the Native Americans appear to have respected each other, our battle cry as eleven year olds running onto the football pitch was ‘Geronimo’ which I can only think was Hollywood influence. Did you know that U.K. is perhaps the only country in the World, maybe India as well, where the Saturday juvenile audience cheers on the red men in Western movies? No ‘hat colour’ coding (white for heroes, black for villains) , for us in Yorkshire. I was once watching that fabulous piece of hokum “Crimson pirate” at the village flea pit when Maureen O’Hara, heroine, implored Burt Lancaster, villain, to “Come and join us” and the whole audience broke out in the Sally Army hymn.
It is possible that in USA the entire audience sits well mannerdly in silence during Hollywood Western movies, but I, as a Yorkshireman, find that hard to swallow.
Select the correct answer. How are the Declaration of Sentiments and the Declaration of Independence similar?
A. They both state that the people they are representing deserve basic rights.
B. They both were created to give the government authority over the people.
C. They both were created to help individuals around the world live in peace.
D. They both state that all individuals were created by the same creator.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
They are basically the same thing just under different names.
The both Declaration of Sentiments and the Declaration of Independence proclaim that such individuals they symbolize are entitled to basic rights.
Both "The Declaration of Independence" and "The Declaration of Sentiments Urging Comparable Equality for Women" begin with the phrase "When, in the span of development circumstances, it becomes essential," and then provide a list of concerns after a few lines.
So,
Option "A" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/18315794?referrer=searchResults
Which event made people question whether New Mexicans would be loyal to Spain or Mexico over the United States
A. The revolt of 1847
B. The Spanish-American war
C. The Mexican-American war
D. The civil war
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The Spanish- American War made people question whether New Mexicans would be loyal to Spain or Mexico over the United States. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What was the Spanish- American War?Following the USS Maine's internal explosion in Cuba's Havana Harbour, which prompted American involvement in the Cuban War of Independence, the Spanish-American War got underway. The conflict culminated in the United States becoming the dominating nation in the Caribbean and in the conquest of Spanish territory in the Pacific.
It prompted American participation in the Philippine Revolution, which ultimately sparked the Philippine-American War. New Mexicans desired to demonstrate their allegiance to the United States at the turn of the 20th century. By enlisting in Teddy Roosevelt's Rough Riders to participate in the Spanish American War, they discovered their chance.
Therefore, option B is the appropriate answer.
To learn more on Spanish-American war, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ2
What were three reasons why the South had a hard time developing a business boom
like the North
What years were the revolutionary war fought?
Answer:
1775-1783
Explanation:
Write a short personal details of Imam Malik Bin Anas(R)
Why was it easy for the North to disrupt Southern transportation once the war began?
Answer:
The South had fewer miles of railroad track.
Explanation:
A major argument for American independence found in the Declaration of Independence was that the
British
(1) stopped participating in the slave trade
(2) refused to sell products to Americans
(3) deprived Americans of their natural rights
(4) censored American representatives in Parliament
Answer:
deprived Americans of their natural rights
Explanation:
1.What is manifest Destiny? 2.What is the Dawes Act?
Answer:
1 : Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America
2: The Dawes Act of 1887 regulated land rights on tribal territories within the United States.
Explanation:
dawns act- It authorized the President of the United States to subdivide Native American tribal communal landholdings into allotments for Native American heads of families and individuals.
Please help me with this
Answer:
good goning
Explanation:
10. Which explains an influence of the Albany Plan of Union? (1 point)
O It encouraged the colonists to immediately break free from England.
O It helped provide inspiration for the Founders when they set up the United States government.
O It allowed the colonists to make peace with the French after the French and Indian War.
O It gave specific backing to the reasons that the Founders issued the Declaration of Independence.
Answer:
1 The correct answer is 1) It offered a model for unification among separate tribes, providing a framework for the unification of the 13 colonies.
Explanation:
The Albany Plan of Union helped inspire the Founders when they set up the United States government.
Explanation:
The Albany Plan was a proposal to create a centralised authority for the Thirteen Colonies in America.
The Albany Plan of Union failed because the colonies were scared of losing their autonomy.The plan influenced the founding fathers after America got its independence to form or set up the United States government.Despite the Albany Plan of Union is a failure, it created a true union, which would be seen in the First Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia.Thus, option B (It helped provide inspiration for the Founders when they set up the United States government) is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the Albany Plan of Union" here:
brainly.com/question/2130303
According to the two migration theories, how might people have settled the Americas?
Answer:
From 1932 to the 1990s, it was thought the first human migration to the Americas actually took place around 13,500 years ago, based on spear points discovered near Clovis, New Mexico. You may have heard of this referred to as the "Clovis-First Model." Over the last 20 years however, the discourse surrounding the story of the first Americans has come into a new light -- one that challenges the previously accepted theories and replaces them with even more shocking and exciting ones.
With these new ideas, the question regarding the story of the first Americans needed to be asked again: if those proverbial first Americans didn't populate the continent over the Bering Land Bridge, who were they, where did they come from and when, and how did they get here? It began in 1997 with the discovery of an archaeological site in Monte Verde, Chile, dating back to 14,500 years ago - a full millennium older than what was previously thought to be the first people in the new world, and indicating they settled much further south than expected.
Although there was strong debate regarding the dating of the Monte Verde findings, it brought up an interesting question: if humans settled in the Americas so much earlier than previously thought and traveled as far as South America, is it possible that these humans journeyed to the new world through a different route?
One radical theory claims it is possible that the first Americans didn't cross the Bering Land Bridge at all and didn't travel by foot, but rather by boat across the Atlantic Ocean. Though the evidence for this theory is minimal, proponents argue that the artifacts were developed by an earlier and still more ancient European group, known as the Solutrean culture. This style bears an uncanny resemblance to that of the Clovis tools found in the United States, which could suggest that humans may have entered America from the east over a route that has been dubbed the Atlantic Maritime route.
A somewhat more widely accepted maritime theory looks to modern cultural anthropology and linguistics, claiming a striking resemblance between the cultures of Australia, Southeast Asia, and South America. Support for this idea is found partially in the discovery of a 9,500 year old skeleton in Washington State. Dubbed the "Kennewick Man," the skeleton bears a strong physical resemblance to the Japanese Ainu people, suggesting that a pan-Pacific journey via boat might have brought the first Americans to our shores.
Explanation:
Why was the Magna Carta created?
Answer:
magna is a way that you follow over ther.
Explanation:
magna was created because to help people of all over the country.If there was no magna we cannot live.
Whos authority does congress use to declare independence from Great Britain?
What was the chief purpose of the Articles of Confederation?
Answer:
here u go
Explanation:
Essentially, The Articles of Confederation named the new country "The United States of America." Congress was given the position to make arrangements and coalitions, keep up with military and coin cash.
cuáles son las diferencias entre un país dominado y uno soberano?
Answer: Como sustantivos, la diferencia entre soberanía y dominio es que la soberanía es (de una política) el estado de hacer leyes y controlar los recursos sin la coerción de otras naciones, mientras que el dominio es el estado de ser dominante; de primordial importancia; supremacía.
Explanation:
Un país dominado es un país cuyas decisiones son tomadas por otro país, grupo u organización, el cual lo ha sometido en mayor o menor grado.
Un país soberano es aquel que puede tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y está en capacidad de responder a la coacción de cualquier país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión soberana.
El grado de soberanía de un país queda descrito en el grado de independencia para tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y en la capacidad de responder a la coacción de otro país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión.
En este sentido, un país dominado es un país cuyas decisiones son tomadas por otro país, grupo u organización, el cual lo ha sometido en mayor o menor grado, mientras que un país soberano es aquel que puede tomar sus propias decisiones frente a cualquier otro país, grupo u organización del mundo y está en capacidad de responder a la coacción de cualquier país, grupo u organización al realizarse tal decisión soberana.
Invitamos cordialmente a ver esta pregunta sobre soberanía: https://brainly.com/question/23858340
Please help this is my last question that i need.
How is the content of 1 John outlined?
i swear if i see a weird comment-
Answer:
1 John is mainly about Jesus and how we must accept him to make it to heaven.
not sure if this is what you were looking for but i hope it helps!
for many rich southerners the final insult that inspired them to break away from the us and start their own nation was
Answer:
Many maintain that the primary cause of the war was the Southern states' desire to preserve the institution of slavery. Others minimize slavery and point to other factors, such as taxation or the principle of States' Rights.
Explanation:
Who was considered Judaisms greatest prophet?
Answer:
Moses was considered Judaism's
greatest prophet
3 facts about the yellow civilizations?
Answer: the yellow river is often called the cradle of Chinese civilization, and it's drainage basin is the third largest in china, and it is more than 3000 years old
Which areas are the main sources of immigration to the United States today? A. Africa and the Pacific Islands B. western and northern Europe C. Asia and North America D. southern and eastern Europe
Answer:
I think is southern and eastern Europe. but i could be wrong..
Explanation:
The process for creating the US Constitution began in 1787 with the convening of the . Delegates debated and argued over the structure of the new government, including how representation would work. The appealed to Southern states because it meant they could count enslaved people in their population, even though the enslaved people couldn’t vote.
Answer:
the Constitutional Convention is right most likely let me know if im wrong
Explanation:
The cycle for making the US Constitution started in 1787 with the meeting of the Constitutional Convention. Delegates discussed and squabbled about the design of the new government, including how portrayal would work. The Three-fifths Compromise spoke to Southern states since it implied they could include oppressed individuals in their populace, despite the fact that the subjugated individuals couldn't cast a ballot.
What was the principal reason for the Constitutional Convention of 1787?The Constitutional Convention occurred from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The mark of the occasion was to conclude the way that America would have been administered. Albeit the Convention had been authoritatively called to amend the current Articles of Confederation, many agents had a lot greater plans.
What was the goal of the agents to the Constitutional Convention?The first intention was to correct the Articles of Confederation to frame a more grounded presidential part of the government. This plan was supplanted by the representatives' assurance to compose another archive, the Constitution of the United States.
Learn more about US Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ2
Capital is the ability of people to do work? True or false?
Answer:
False
Capital means money or funds it doesn't mean ability of people to do work
The ability of people to do work is known as capability not capital
What was the name of the group of thugs the Nazis used to harass voters
Answer:
Sturmabetlieg
Explanation:
The Nazi's used these to harass voters, which was a key part of Hitler's rise to power.
Why did Thomas Jefferson change property to the pursuit of happiness in the Declaration
Answer:
“The pursuit of happiness” is the most famous phrase in the Declaration of Independence. Conventional history and popular wisdom attribute the phrase to the genius of Thomas Jefferson when in an imaginative leap, he replaced the third term of John Locke’s trinity, “life, liberty, and property.” It was a felicitous, even thrilling, substitution. Yet the true history and philosophical meaning of the famous phrase are apparently unknown.
In an article entitled “The Pursuit of Happiness,” posted at the Huffington Post July 4, 2007, Daniel Brook summed up what most of us learned in school: “The eighteenth-century British political philosopher John Locke wrote that governments are instituted to secure people's rights to ‘life, liberty, and property.’ And in 1776, Thomas Jefferson begged to differ. When he penned the Declaration of Independence, ratified on the Fourth of July, he edited out Locke's right to ‘property’ and substituted his own more broad-minded, distinctly American concept: the right to ‘the pursuit of happiness.’ "
Familiar as all this sounds, Brook is wrong on three points. John Locke lived from 1634 to 1704, making him a man of the seventeenth century, not the eighteenth. Jefferson did not substitute his “own” phrase. Nor is that concept “distinctly American.” It is an import, and Jefferson borrowed it.
Explanation:
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the unalienable rights which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their creator, and which governments are created to protect. Like the other principles in the Declaration of Independence, this phrase is not legally binding, but has been widely referenced and seen as an inspiration for the basis of government.
Answer:
“The pursuit of happiness” is the most famous phrase in the Declaration of Independence. Conventional history and popular wisdom attribute the phrase to the genius of Thomas Jefferson when in an imaginative leap, he replaced the third term of John Locke’s trinity, “life, liberty, and property.” It was a felicitous, even thrilling, substitution. Yet the true history and philosophical meaning of the famous phrase are apparently unknown.
Explanation:
there is theanswer i hope it helps
What are the implications of the statement "all men are created equal"?
Answer:
What he really meant was that the American colonists, as a people, had the same rights of self-government as other peoples, and hence could declare independence, create new governments, and assume their “separate and equal station” among other nations.
Answer:
it means me are the best I don't know lol
Which of the following is a potential barrier to efficiency?
Direction
Resignation
Prediction
Deliberation
The correct answer is "Resignation."
What is a potential barrier to efficiency is "Resignation."
> It is not "Direction," because it provides the path to move to the desired place the organization wants to arrive.
> It is not "prediction," because it is a forecast of possible scenarios to be faced in the near future.
> It is not "Deliberation" because deliberation allows people to express their arguments in order to come up with a solution.
> That is why the correct answer is "Resignation."
> Resignation makes people assume a comfortable position in the company and they refrain to make their best effort.
> Let's have in mind that efficiency is "to make more with less."
> Efficiency is a key component to be effective in the corporate world.
We can conclude that to be efficient, employers need to be trained and constantly motivated to perform at the best of their capabilities. Otherwise, one of the risks is they can assume an attitude of resignation.
Learn more about this topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/20560983?referrer=searchResults
Based on what you have read, which of the following statements are correct? Check all of the boxes that apply.
A) Some scientists think the first migrants to the Americas came by boat.
B) Some scientists claim migrants could not come by land because there was no land bridge.
C) Some scientists think the first migrants to the Americas came by crossing a land bridge.
D) Most scientists believe the first migrants came to North America from Asia.
E)Most scientists believe the first migrants came to North America from South America.
F) Scientists have no theories about how the first migrants came to the Americas.
Answer:
Option D is correct because the first wave of humans came from Steppe region of Russia to Alaska.
