Calculate the cross product. (Use symbolic notation and fractions where needed.) (i+j) x k = _________

Each tire made approximately 375 rotations on Stan's drive.

Distance covered by each tire = 3300 m

Distance is the amount of space between two points or objects. It can be measured in various units such as kilometers, miles, meters, feet, etc. In mathematics, distance is often calculated using the Pythagorean theorem or other distance formulas, depending on the context of the problem.

To find the number of rotations each tire made on Stan's drive, we need to first find the distance each tire covered and then divide it by the circumference of the tire.

The distance covered by each tire is equal to the distance Stan drove divided by the number of tires on his truck. Therefore,

distance covered by each tire = 3300 m / 4 = 825 m

The number of rotations each tire made is equal to the distance covered by the tire divided by its circumference. Therefore,

the number of rotations = distance covered by tire/circumference of the tire

For the given tire with a circumference of 2.2 m, we have

number of rotations = 825 m / 2.2 m ≈ 375

To know more about the circumference visit:

brainly.com/question/4268218

#SPJ1

A researcher is using a one-way between-subjects ANOVA with k = 5 groups and N = 80 total participants. The degrees of freedom between-groups (df_ between) can be calculated using the formula:

df_ between = k - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is an analytical tool used in statistics that divides all the variability in the data set into two parts as systematic and random. While systematic factors affect a particular data set statistically, random factors do not. Analysts use the ANOVA test to determine the effects of independent variables on variables in a regression study.

The t-test and z-test methods developed in the 20th century were used in statistical analysis until Ronald Fisher developed the ANOVA method in 1918. ANOVA, also known as Fisher's method of variance analysis, is an extension of the t and z test.

To calculate the degrees of freedom between-groups for a one-way between-subjects ANOVA, we use the formula df_ between = k - 1, where k is the number of groups (levels of the independent variable).
In this case, k = 5, so df_ between = 5 - 1 = 4.

It's important to note that the degrees of freedom within-groups can be calculated using the formula df_ within = N - k, where N is the total sample size.
In this case, N = 80, so df_ within = 80 - 5 = 75.

So, the correct answer is d. 4.

Learn more about Degrees of Freedom:

brainly.com/question/31424137

#SPJ11

The quotient is 5.87 and remainder will be 0.10  

In HCF by long division method we first divide the greater number by the smallest number and then divide the smaller number by the remainder. We continue the process until we get 0 remainder. The divisor is the HCF of the given numbers.The partial quotients method or the hangman method also known as long division method

According to question 0.7 is divisor 4.11 is dividend calculating  by long division method we get,

0.7 ) 4.11 ( 5.87

    -  3.5

   ________

        6.1

     -  5.6

     ________

        0.50

      - 0.49

    _________

         0.10

Hence, the quotient is 5.87 and remainder will be 0.10

Learn more about HCF here

https://brainly.com/question/29114178

#SPJ1

The cost function for unregularized logistic regression is given by:

J(θ) = -1/n * [ Σ( y(i) * log(hθ(x(i))) + (1-y(i)) * log(1 - hθ(x(i))) ) ]

where θ is the parameter vector, hθ(x) is the sigmoid function which predicts the probability of the output being 1 given the input x, y(i) is the actual label for the i-th training example, and n is the total number of training examples.

This cost function measures the error between the predicted probabilities and the actual labels, and penalizes more heavily for larger errors. The goal of logistic regression is to find the values of θ that minimize this cost function, which is typically done using gradient descent or other optimization algorithms.

To learn more about cost function visit:

brainly.com/question/29583181

#SPJ11

29 students scored at least 70 but less than 90, which is evaluated by using the cumulative frequency.

To discover the number of understudies with scores more noteworthy than or rise to 70 but less than 90, we have to discover the cumulative frequency of scores between 70 and 90. 

From this table, ready to see that the total frequency of scores up to 70 is 63, and the total frequency of scores up to 90 is 92. So the number of understudies with scores over 70 and underneath 90 is:

Cumulative frequency of outcomes up to 90 - Cumulative frequency of outcomes up to 70

= 92 - 63

= 29

Therefore, 29 students scored at least 70 but less than 90.

learn more about  cumulative frequency

brainly.com/question/30087370

#SPJ4

There are 17,576 possible 3-letter passwords that can be created using the letters a through z with repetition allowed.

To find the number of 3-letter passwords that can be made using the letters a through z with repetition allowed, we can use the multiplication principle of counting.

Since each position in the password can be filled with any of the 26 letters, we have 26 choices for the first position, 26 choices for the second position, and 26 choices for the third position. Therefore, the total number of 3-letter passwords that can be formed is:

26 x 26 x 26 = 17,576

So, there are 17,576 possible 3-letter passwords that can be created using the letters a through z with repetition allowed.

Learn more about 3-letter passwords

https://brainly.com/question/14471020

#SPJ4

Answer:

$882

Step-by-step explanation:

El número tiene que ser divisible por 2, 10 y 11, lo que significa que tiene que ser divisible por el mínimo común múltiplo de esos tres números, que es 220. Además, los dígitos tienen una suma de 18, lo que significa que las combinaciones posibles de dígitos son 9+9+0 o 8+8+2.

Si el número es 990, es divisible por 220 pero está fuera del rango dado (más de 4500 pero menos de 5500).

Si el número es 882, también es divisible por 220 y está dentro del rango dado. Por lo tanto, Juan tiene $882 en su bolsillo.

The average value of a particular sample is known as sample mean

Sample mean is calculated by adding up all the values in the samples and after that dividing by the total no of observations in the sample

Options and definitions given in the question are not accurate

Because rather than sample means, we call it average of sample means

Sample means provides an estimate of the central tendency of the sample and it's basically a descriptive statistic

Suppose we have samples of five scores: 5, 6, 2, 8, 1

Then the sample mean would be :

[tex]\frac{(5 + 6 + 2 + 8 + 1}{5}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{22}{5}[/tex] = 4.4

Sample mean would be 4.4

To learn more about sample mean:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

The estimated average cost when x=3 using the marginal average cost when x=2 for the cost function

C(x) = 40 + x - 12x² is -25.

We have to estimate the average cost when x=3 using the marginal average cost when x=2 for the cost function

C(x) = 40 + x - 12x².

Find the average cost function (A(x)):
A(x) = C(x) / x

= (40 + x - 12x²) / x

Differentiate A(x) to find the marginal average cost function (A'(x)):
A'(x) = d(A(x)) / dx

= d(40/x + 1 - 12x) / dx

= [tex]\frac{-40}{x^2} - 12[/tex]

Calculate the marginal average cost at x=2 (A'(2)):
A'(2) = [tex]\frac{-40}{2^2} - 12[/tex]

= -10 - 12

= -22

Estimate the change in average cost between x=2 and x=3:
ΔA ≈ A'(2) × Δx

= -22 × (3-2)

= -22

Calculate the average cost at x=2 (A(2)):
A(2) = (40 + 2 - 12(2²)) / 2

= (40 + 2 - 48) / 2

= -6/2

= -3

Estimate the average cost at x=3 (A(3)):
A(3) ≈ A(2) + ΔA

= -3 - 22

= -25

So, the estimated average cost when x=3 is -25.

Learn more about average:

https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

The antiderivative of f(x) is: f(x) = -arctan(tan(x/2)) + C

We can find the antiderivative of f(x) by using the substitution u = cos(x). Then du/dx = -sin(x) and dx = du / (-sin(x)).

Substituting these values into f(x), we get:

[tex]f(x) = (1/2)csc^2(x) / x^2= (1/2)(1/sin^2(x)) / x^2= (1/2)u^(-2) / (1 - u^2)[/tex]

Now, substituting u = cos(x), we get:

[tex]f(x) = (1/2)cos^(-2)(x) / (1 - cos^2(x))= (1/2)cos^(-2)(x) / (sin^2(x))[/tex]

Next, we use the identity cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1 to get:

[tex]f(x) = (1/2)cos^(-2)(x) / (1 - cos^2(x)) * (1/cos^2(x))= (1/2) / (cos^2(x) - 1)[/tex]

Now, we can use the substitution v = tan(x/2). Then cos(x) = [tex](1 - v^2) / (1 + v^2)[/tex]and dx = (2/(1 + [tex]v^2))[/tex] dv.

Substituting these values into f(x), we get:

[tex]f(x) = (1/2) / (cos^2(x) - 1)= (1/2) / (-2 sin^2(x/2))= -1 / (1 + v^2)[/tex]

Therefore, the antiderivative of f(x) is: f(x) = -arctan(tan(x/2)) + C

Learn more about antiderivative f(x)

https://brainly.com/question/14011803

#SPJ4

Equation of the line passes throgh Q(3, -2) and perpendicular to line g is x + 2y + 1 = 0

If two lines are perpendicular, then their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. That is, if the slope of one line is m, and the slope of the perpendicular line is m₂ then the product of slopes will equal - 1

Here we have

The line y = 2x - 1  

Which is in the form of y = mx + c

=> Slope of line g is m = 2

Let y = m₁x + c is the line

Since the line perpendicular to line g

The product of lines m(m₁) = - 1

=> 2(m₁) = - 1

=> m₁ = -1/2    

Hence, Equation of the line y = (-1/2)x + c

=> 2y = -x + 2c --- (1)

From the given data,

The line passes through Q(3, -2)

=> 2(-2) = -(3) + c

=> -4 = -3 + c

=>  2c = - 1  

=> c = -1/2

Hence, the equation of the line is 2y = -x + 2(-1/2)

=>   2y = -x - 1

=> x + 2y + 1 = 0

Therefore,

Equation of the line passes throgh Q(3, -2) and perpendicular to line g is x + 2y + 1 = 0

Learn more about Perpendicular lines at

https://brainly.com/question/13749558

#SPJ1

Using Chebyshev's theorem for standard deviation, at least 96% of the data lies within five standard deviations of the mean.

Chebyshev's theorem states that for any data set, regardless of its distribution, at least 1 - (1/k^2) of the data falls within k standard deviations from the mean.
Step 1: Identify the number of standard deviations (k) from the mean.
In this case, k = 5.
Step 2: Apply Chebyshev's theorem.
Chebyshev's theorem states that the proportion of data within k standard deviations of the mean is at least (1 - 1/k^2).
Step 3: Plug in the value of k into the formula.
Percentage of data within 5 standard deviations = (1 - 1/5^2) = (1 - 1/25)
Step 4: Calculate the percentage.
Percentage of data within 5 standard deviations = (1 - 1/25) = 24/25 = 0.96
Step 5: Convert the proportion to a percentage.
0.96 * 100 = 96%
So, using Chebyshev's theorem for standard deviation, at least 96% of the data lies within five standard deviations of the mean.

Learn more about Chebyshev's theorem here, https://brainly.com/question/5179184

#SPJ11

The resulting surface is a hyperbolic paraboloid with its center at the origin.

Why are use traces to sketch the surface?

The traces to sketch the surface y = z² - x²,

Follow these steps:

Learn more about surface.

brainly.com/question/28267043

#SPJ11

Answer:Thus our answer is 60 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest?

To calculate the miles per gallon, or the unit rate, you divide the total distance by the total fuel used. In this example, the car uses an average of 26.8 miles per gallon of gasoline.

The unit rate represents the amount of miles a car can travel per one gallon of gasoline. To find this, we need to divide the total distance driven by the gallons of gasoline used.

Step 1: Identify the total distance and the total gallons used. Here, the total distance driven is 100.5 miles, and the gallons of gasoline used is 3.75.

Step 2: To find how many miles per gallon the car uses, divide the total miles by the total gallons used:

100.5 miles / 3.75 gallons = 26.8 miles per gallon.

So, the car uses an average of 26.8 miles per gallon of gasoline. In terms of decimals, 26.8 is the unit rate.

https://brainly.com/question/22607023

#SPJ2

For a pair of vertical angles, ∠a and ∠b, with meaures m∠a = (2x+20) and m∠b = (3x+1), the value of x is equals to the 19.

Vertical angles are defined as a pair of non-adjacent angles made by the intersection of two straight lines. We have two measures of angle a and b. The angles ∠a and ∠b are vertical angles. The measure of angle a, m∠a = 2x + 20

The measure of angle b, m∠b = 3x + 1

We have to determine the value of x. Using vertical angles definition, m∠a

= m∠b

=> 2x + 20 = 3x + 1

=> 3x - 2x = 20 - 1

=> x = 19

so, measure of angle b, m∠b = 3× 19 + 1

= 58° and measure of angle a, m∠a is 58°.

Hence, required value of x is 19.

For more information about angle, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ4

a.   The value of δ¹⁸ₒ is -3.4‰

b.   More glaciation at deposition.

a. The δ¹⁸ₒ value can be calculated using the following equation:

δ¹⁸ₒ = (¹⁸ₒ/¹⁶ₒ sample - ¹⁸ₒ/¹⁶ₒ VSMOW) / ¹⁸ₒ/¹⁶ₒ VSMOW x 1000

Therefore, the δ¹⁸ₒ value for this sediment sample is -3.4‰

b. A negative δ¹⁸ₒ value indicates a higher level of glaciation at the time the sediment was deposited compared to the present time.

This is because during glaciation, the amount of ¹⁸ₒ in the oceans decreases relative to ¹⁶ₒ due to the formation of sea ice.

The negative δ¹⁸ₒ value for this sediment sample suggests that there was more glaciation at the time the sediment was deposited compared to the present day.

Complete Question:

Suppose an ocean sediment sample shows (¹⁸ₒ/¹⁶ₒ) = 0.0020150. Using the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW) as a reference for seawater,

What is the value of δ¹⁸ₒ?

b. Does the  δ¹⁸ₒ value indicate more or less glaciation at the time the sediment was deposited compared to the present time?

To learn more about sediment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29675258

#SPJ4

Final Answer:   The small change in x and corresponding change in y  is             [tex]dy = (6x^2-2)dx[/tex]

                           dy = ((sec^211x)*11) dx

f(x) =  [tex]2x^3-2x[/tex]

Here we can consider y as function of x so y=f(x).

Derivative is nothing but rate of change i.e. small change in y with respect to x when y is function of x.  

[tex](dy/dx )= 6x^2-2[/tex]

[tex]dy = (6x^2-2)dx[/tex]

Second function here is f(x) = tan11x

Here also we will consider y as function of x

here we need to apply chain rule multiple of x is there.

so [tex](dy/dx) = (sec^211x)*11[/tex]

[tex]dy = ((sec^211x)*11) dx[/tex]

To learn more about Derivatives and chain rule https://brainly.com/question/1497498

#SPJ11

There is not convincing evidence of a linear relationship between a student's GPA and the number of pencils in his or her backpack for students at this high school. To determine this, we can analyze the least-squares regression analysis output provided. The coefficient of determination (R-squared) is 0.9%, which is very low.

This means that only 0.9% of the variation in GPA can be explained by the number of pencils. Furthermore, the adjusted R-squared is 0.0%, which also indicates a weak relationship.What is Least Square Method: The least squares method is a form of mathematical regression analysis used to determine the line of best fit for a set of data, providing a visual demonstration of the relationship between the data points. The least squares method is a mathematical technique that allows the analyst to determine the best way of fitting a curve on top of a chart of data points. It is widely used to make scatter plots easier to interpret and is associated with regression analysis. Each point of data represents the relationship between a known independent variable and an unknown dependent variable. Additionally, the t-value for the "Pencils" predictor is -0.670. Since the t-value is not significant (usually, a significant t-value is greater than 1.96 or less than -1.96), we can conclude that there is not convincing evidence of a linear relationship between the two variables.

Learn More About regression: https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ11

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

55.89 can be estimated to be 56

7.68 can be estimated to be 8

56/8=7

The coordinates (4, 3) and (10, 7)) are produced by values of s of 5 and 12.2, respectively.

A set of integers, numbers, and letters called coordinates are used to represent a location on a map.

They can help you find a specific place or object.

A location on a grid, also known as a coordinate plane, is identified by coordinates, a pair of numbers (also known as Cartesian coordinates), or sometimes a letter and a number.

The two axes that make up a coordinate plane are the horizontal x-axis and the vertical y-axis (vertical).

So, the single value is calculated as follows to produce the coordinates:

s = √x² + y²

For (4, 3):

s = √4² + 3²

s = √16 + 9

s = √25

s = 5

For (10, 7):

s = √10² + 7²

s = √100 + 49

s = √149

s = 12.20

Therefore, the coordinates (4, 3) and (10, 7)) are produced by values of s of 5 and 12.2, respectively.

Know more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/20935031

#SPJ1

Aida and Marco need approximately 37 feet of painter's tape to cover the edges of both walls.

To find the length of the painter's tape needed to cover the edges of both walls, we need to find the perimeter of the trapezoid-shaped walls.

First, we need to find the lengths of the sides of the trapezoid-shaped walls. We can use the distance formula to find the lengths of the sides:

[tex]AB = \sqrt{[(6 - (-5))^2 + (3 - (-1))^2]}= \sqrt{(11^2 + 4^2) }= \sqrt{137BC = \sqrt{[(-5 - (-5))^2 + (-5 - 3)^2] }= \sqrt{(0^2 + (-8)^2)}= 8CD = \sqrt{[(6 - (-5))^2 + (-5 - (-1))^2] }= \sqrt{(11^2 + 16^2)} = \sqrt{317DA = \sqrt{[(-5 - 6)^2 + (-1 - (-5))^2] }= \sqrt{(11^2 + 16^2) }= \sqrt{317[/tex]

Next, we can find the perimeter of the trapezoid-shaped walls by adding up the lengths of the sides:

Perimeter = AB + BC + CD + DA

= √137 + 8 + √317 + √317

= √137 + 2√317 + 8

≈ 36.65 feet

Therefore, To find the length of the painter's tape needed to cover the edges of both walls, we need to find the perimeter of the trapezoid-shaped walls.

First, we need to find the lengths of the sides of the trapezoid-shaped walls. We can use the distance formula to find the lengths of the sides:

[tex]AB = \sqrt{[(6 - (-5))^2 + (3 - (-1))^2]}= \sqrt{(11^2 + 4^2) }= \sqrt{137BC = \sqrt{[(-5 - (-5))^2 + (-5 - 3)^2] }= \sqrt{(0^2 + (-8)^2)}= 8CD = \sqrt{[(6 - (-5))^2 + (-5 - (-1))^2] }= \sqrt{(11^2 + 16^2)} = \sqrt{317DA = \sqrt{[(-5 - 6)^2 + (-1 - (-5))^2] }= \sqrt{(11^2 + 16^2) }= \sqrt{317[/tex]

Next, we can find the perimeter of the trapezoid-shaped walls by adding up the lengths of the sides:

Perimeter = AB + BC + CD + DA

= √137 + 8 + √317 + √317

= √137 + 2√317 + 8

≈ 36.65 feet

Therefore, Aida and Marco need approximately 37 feet of painter's tape to cover the edges of both walls.

To know more about perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ1

The solutions to the quadratic equation 4x² + 9 = 94 are x = √(85)/2 and x = -√(85)/2.

A second-degree polynomial equation is a quadratic equation. Depending on the discriminant (b square - 4ac) of the equation, quadratic equations might have zero, one, or two real solutions. If the discriminant is positive, there are two unique real solutions to the problem. There is only one actual solution to the equation if the discriminant is zero (called a double root). The equation may have two complex conjugate solutions (using the fictitious unit). if the discriminant is negative rather than having any real solutions. Several fields, including science, engineering, economics, and others, use quadratic equations.

The given equation is 4x² + 9 = 94

Simplifying the equation we have:

4x² = 85

x = ±√(85/4) = ±(√(85)/2)

Hence, the solutions to the quadratic equation 4x² + 9 = 94 are x = √(85)/2 and x = -√(85)/2.

Learn more about quadratic equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]t\geq 18[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The dilation is centered at the origin and has a scale factor of 0.5.

Here are the steps to find the image coordinates using a dilation centered at the origin with a scale factor of 0.5:

Write down the coordinates of the pre-image points.

P(-4, 2), L(2, 4), A(2, -4), Y(-4, -2)

Multiply each coordinate by the scale factor of 0.5.

P' = (0.5 × -4, 0.5 × 2) = (-2, 1)

L' = (0.5 × 2, 0.5 × 4) = (1, 2)

A' = (0.5 × 2, 0.5 × -4) = (1, -2)

Y' = (0.5 × -4, 0.5 × -2) = (-2, -1)

Write down the image coordinates.

P'(-2, 1), L'(1, 2), A'(1, -2), Y'(-2, -1)

Therefore, the dilation centered at the origin with a scale factor of 0.5 maps the points P(-4, 2), L(2, 4), A(2, -4), Y(-4, -2) to their respective images P'(-2, 1), L'(1, 2), A'(1, -2), Y'(-2, -1).

Find out more on dilation here: https://brainly.com/question/20482938

#SPJ1

Image transcribed:

Use coordinate notation to describe the dilation. Express the scale factor as a decimal if necessary.

In mathematics, a matrix (plural matrices) is a rectangular array or table of numbers, symbols, or expressions, arranged in rows and columns, which is used to represent a mathematical object or a property of such an object.

For example,

[

1

9

−

13

20

5

−

6

]

{\displaystyle {\begin{bmatrix}1&9&-13\\20&5&-6\end{bmatrix}}}

is a matrix with two rows and three columns. This is often referred to as a "two by three matrix", a "

2

×

3

{\displaystyle 2\times 3} matrix", or a matrix of dimension

2

×

3

{\displaystyle 2\times 3}.

A possible basis for the space of symmetric 2 x 2 matrices is {
[1 0; 0 0], [0 1; 1 0], [0 0; 0 1] }.

There are three elements in the basis.
Hi! A basis for the space of symmetric 2 x 2 matrices can be represented using the following three matrices:

1. [1, 0]
  [0, 0]

2. [0, 1]
  [1, 0]

3. [0, 0]
  [0, 1]

These matrices are symmetric because their transposes (A^T) are equal to themselves (A). There are three elements in this basis.

To know more about matrix visit:brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

To find the point of intersection between the two curves, we need to solve for when their x, y, and z components are equal. Setting the x-components equal, we get: t = 6 - s .

Setting the y-components equal, we get: 2 - t = s - 4 , Rearranging, we get: t + s = 6 . Setting the z-components equal, we get: 24 + t^2 = s^2 . Substituting t + s = 6, we get: 24 + (6 - s)^2 = s^2 , Expanding and simplifying, we get: s^2 - 12s + 36 = 0 . Factoring, we get: (s - 6)(s - 6) = 0, So s = 6, and therefore t = 0. The curves intersect at the point (0, -4, 24).To find the angle of intersection between the two curves, we can use the dot product formula: cos(theta) = (r1'(t) dot r2'(s)) / (|r1'(t)| * |r2'(s)|), where r1'(t) and r2'(s) are the derivatives of the curves r1(t) and r2(s), respectively.

Calculating the derivatives, we get: r1'(t) = (1, -1, 2t) , r2'(s) = (-1, 1, 2s), Plugging in t = 0 and s = 6, we get: r1'(0) = (1, -1, 0)
r2'(6) = (-1, 1, 12), Calculating the magnitudes, we get: |r1'(0)| = sqrt(2) , |r2'(6)| = sqrt(146) , Calculating the dot product, we get:  r1'(0) dot r2'(6) = -1 , Plugging everything into the formula, we get: cos(theta) = -1 / (sqrt(2) * sqrt(146))  .Simplifying, we get: cos(theta) = -0.155 Taking the inverse cosine, we get: theta = 101 degrees (to the nearest degree) .Therefore, the curves intersect at the point (0, -4, 24) and their angle of intersection is 101 degrees.

To know more about angle click here

brainly.com/question/14569348

#SPJ11

Answer:

To find the odds of an event occurring, we need to use the formula:

Odds = Probability of the event happening / Probability of the event not happening

In this case, the probability of the event happening is 2/13. The probability of the event not happening is 1 - 2/13 = 11/13.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Odds = (2/13) / (11/13) = 2/11

Therefore, the odds of the event occurring are 2 to 11.

The required solutions of the given equation are x = 30 or x < -50.

We can solve the equation by isolating the absolute value expression on one side and then solving for x.

First, we add 6 to both sides to get:

| x/5 + 2 | = 8

Next, we can split the equation into two cases, one where x/5 + 2 is positive and one where it is negative.

Case 1: x/5 + 2 ≥ 0

In this case, we can remove the absolute value bars and solve for x:

x/5 + 2 = 8

Subtracting 2 from both sides gives:

x/5 = 6

Multiplying both sides by 5 gives:

x = 30

So one solution is x = 30.

Case 2: x/5 + 2 < 0

In this case, we can also remove the absolute value bars but we need to flip the inequality when we do so:

-(x/5 + 2) = 8

Simplifying, we get:

-x/5 - 2 = 8

Subtracting 2 from both sides gives:

-x/5 = 10

Multiplying both sides by -5 (and remembering to flip the inequality) gives:

x < -50

So the solutions in this case are all x such that x < -50.

Putting the solutions from both cases together, we get:

x = 30 or x < -50.

To know more about Mode visit:

brainly.com/question/11943695

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. 18

2. 16

3. 45

4. 72

5. 32

6. 42

7. 20

8. 9

9. 78

10. 4

To find the population size after 4 hours, we can use the formula:

P(t) = P(0) * e^(rt)
where P(t) is the population size at time t, P(0) is the initial population size, r is the relative growth rate, and e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.718.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

P(4) = 3.1 million * e^(0.4435 * 4)
P(4) = 3.1 million * e^(1.774)
P(4) = 3.1 million * 5.913
P(4) = 18.333 million cells
Therefore, the population size after 4 hours is 18.3 million cells (rounded to one decimal place).
 Based on the given information, the population of yeast cells grows with a constant relative growth rate of 0.4435 per hour, and the initial population is 3.1 million cells. To find the population size after 4 hours, we can use the exponential growth formula:
P(t) = P0 * e^(rt)

where P(t) is the population size after t hours, P0 is the initial population (3.1 million cells), r is the growth rate (0.4435 per hour), and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828).
For this problem, t = 4 hours. Plugging the values into the formula, we get:
P(4) = 3.1 * e^(0.4435 * 4)
Now, calculate the exponent:
0.4435 * 4 = 1.774
Then, calculate e raised to this power:
e^1.774 ≈ 5.897
Next, multiply this by the initial population:
3.1 * 5.897 ≈ 18.2797

So, after rounding the answer to one decimal place, the population size after 4 hours is approximately 18.3 million cells.

To know more Population  about click here .

brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11