Can anyone help me with this?

The value closest to the correlation for the given scatterplot would be C.) -0.75.

In a scatterplot, the correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. A value of -0.75 indicates a strong negative correlation. Since the data points fit loosely around a line that slopes down to the right, it suggests a negative correlation. The closer the correlation coefficient is to -1, the stronger the negative correlation. Option C.) -0.75 is the value closest to -1 and represents a stronger negative correlation compared to the other options.

To determine the precise correlation coefficient, statistical calculations or software can be used. These calculations involve measuring the covariance and standard deviations of the variables. However, based on the given description, it is apparent that the data points exhibit a loose fit around a downward-sloping line, indicating a strong negative correlation.

Learn more about correlation coefficients

brainly.com/question/29704223

#SPJ11

[tex]\huge\text{Hey there!}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\textbf{Formula:}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{sum \ of \ all \ of \ the \ numbers \ in \ the \ data}{total \ numbers \ you \ have \ in \ the \ data} = mean}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\textbf{Equation:}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{34 + 56 + 44 + 200}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\textbf{Solving:}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{34 + 56 + 44 + 200}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= \dfrac{90 + 44 + 200}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= \dfrac{134 + 200}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= \dfrac{334}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= \dfrac{334\div2}{4\div2}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= \dfrac{167}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{= 83\dfrac{1}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\text{Therefore your answer should be: }[/tex]

[tex]\huge\boxed{\mathtt{\mathtt{83\dfrac{1}{2}}}}\huge\checkmark[/tex]

[tex]\huge\text{Good luck on your assignment \& enjoy your day!}[/tex]

The distribution of -5X₁ and 2X₂, where X₁ and X₂ are independent normal random variables, is also a normal distribution.

When we multiply a normal random variable by a constant, it affects the mean and standard deviation of the resulting distribution.

In this case, we have -5X₁ and 2X₂, where X₁ and X₂ are independent normal random variables.

For -5X₁, the mean becomes -5 times the mean of X₁, and the standard deviation becomes 5 times the standard deviation of X₁.

Similarly, for 2X₂, the mean becomes 2 times the mean of X₂, and the standard deviation becomes 2 times the standard deviation of X₂.

Since the mean and standard deviation determine the shape of the normal distribution, the distribution of -5X₁ and 2X₂ will still be a normal distribution.

However, the mean and standard deviation will be adjusted according to the multiplication factors.

Learn more about standard deviation

brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

The complete statement:

When the sectors of the circle are rearranged, they are close to forming a rectangle with a length of π units and a width of r units. The area of the rearranged figure is equal to that of the circle. So, the area of the circular base is πr² square units.

The area of the rearranged figure, which is the same as the area of the circle, remains unchanged. This is because the total area of the circle is still preserved when the sectors are rearranged.

Therefore, the area of the circular base of the cylinder is also equal to π square units. This is because the base of the cylinder is formed by the rearranged sectors of the circle, which have the same area as the original circle.

To learn more about the circle;

https://brainly.com/question/29142813

#SPJ1

The complete question:

Suppose the bottom surface, or base, of a cylinder is divided into 16 congruent sectors. Then the sectors are rearranged as shown. Open this GeoGebra activity to divide the circle into even more sectors and rearrange the sectors for yourself.

Complete the statements to compare the areas of the two figures and find the area of the base of the cylinder.

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.

When the sectors of the circle are rearranged, they are close to forming a____

with a length of ___▾ units and a width of r units.

The area of the rearranged figure is___

to that of the circle. So, the area of the circular base___

square units.

According to the given question we have The value of k that makes the function f continuous at x = 2 is -2.

To determine the value of k that makes the function f continuous at x = 2, we need to evaluate the limit of the function at x = 2 from both sides and ensure that they are equal.

First, let's evaluate the limit as x approaches 2 from the left side (x < 2). We have:

lim (x->2-) f(x) = lim (x->2-) (x^2 - 5x + k) = 2^2 - 5(2) + k = -2 + k

Next, let's evaluate the limit as x approaches 2 from the right side (x > 2). We have:

lim (x->2+) f(x) = lim (x->2+) (4 - 4x + k) = 4 - 4(2) + k = -4 + k

For the function to be continuous at x = 2, these two limits must be equal. Therefore, we have:

-2 + k = -4 + k

Solving for k, we get:

k = -2

Therefore, the value of k that makes the function f continuous at x = 2 is -2.

To know more about Function  visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

To find an orthogonal matrix A with the first row as a multiple of (1,0,-1), we can use the Gram-Schmidt process to create an orthonormal basis for the row space. Let's call the first row vector v.

First, we normalize v by dividing it by its magnitude: v/√2.
Next, we choose a vector w that is orthogonal to v. One such vector is (1,1,0).
Then, we normalize w by dividing it by its magnitude: w/√2.
Now, we have an orthonormal basis for the row space: {(1/√2, 0, -1/√2), (1/√2, 1/√2, 0)}.
To construct the matrix A, we simply use these basis vectors as the rows of A. So,
A =
| 1/√2 0 -1/√2 |
| 1/√2 1/√2 0   |
| 0    0    1   |
This is an orthogonal matrix because its rows are orthonormal (and hence its columns are also orthonormal). Additionally, we can check that A^T A = I, which is another condition for a matrix to be orthogonal.
Overall, the matrix A with the first row as a multiple of (1,0,-1) is:
A =
| 1/√2 0 -1/√2 |
| 1/√2 1/√2 0   |
| 0    0    1   |
This matrix has three columns, representing the three-dimensional space in which it operates. It can be used for a variety of purposes in linear algebra, such as rotating or reflecting vectors in three dimensions.

To know more about Matrix visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29995229

#SPJ11

The derivative of the function [tex]$f(t) = \cos^2(e^{\cos^2(t)})$[/tex] is [tex]$\frac{d}{dt} f(t) = -2\cos(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \sin(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \cdot 2\cos(t) \sin(t) e^{\cos^2(t)}$[/tex].

The derivative of the function [tex]$f(t) = \cos^2(e^{\cos^2(t)})$[/tex] can be found using the chain rule and the derivative properties of trigonometric and exponential functions.

To find the derivative of the given function, we apply the chain rule. Let's break down the function into its constituent parts and find their derivatives separately.

The outer function is [tex]$g(t) = \cos^2(u)$[/tex], where [tex]$u = e^{\cos^2(t)}$[/tex].

The derivative of g(t) can be found using the chain rule and the derivative of the cosine function:

[tex]$\frac{d}{dt} g(t) = -2\cos(u) \sin(u) \cdot \frac{du}{dt}$[/tex]

Now, we need to find the derivative of u with respect to t.

Let [tex]$v = \cos^2(t)$[/tex]

Then, [tex]$u = e^v$[/tex], and the derivative of u with respect to t is

[tex]$\frac{du}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dt} \cdot e^v$[/tex]

To find [tex]$\frac{dv}{dt}$[/tex], we differentiate [tex]$v = \cos^2(t)$[/tex] using the chain rule and the derivative of the cosine function:

[tex]$\frac{dv}{dt} = -2\cos(t) \sin(t)$[/tex]

Putting it all together, we have

[tex]$\frac{d}{dt} f(t) = \frac{d}{dt} g(t) \cdot \frac{du}{dt} = -2\cos(u) \sin(u) \cdot -2\cos(t) \sin(t) e^{\cos^2(t)}$[/tex]

Simplifying further, we get

[tex]$\frac{d}{dt} f(t) = -2\cos(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \sin(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \cdot 2\cos(t) \sin(t) e^{\cos^2(t)}$[/tex]

Therefore, the derivative of the function [tex]$f(t) = \cos^2(e^{\cos^2(t)})$[/tex] is [tex]$\frac{d}{dt} f(t) = -2\cos(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \sin(e^{\cos^2(t)}) \cdot 2\cos(t) \sin(t) e^{\cos^2(t)}$[/tex].

Learn more about chain rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/30764359

#SPJ11

As regards whether the conditions for inference were met, C. No, the Large Counts condition is not met.

First, the random condition is met since the health inspected selected a sample of workers in random order.

The other condition is that there should not be more than 10 % condition of the sample size and this is achieved because 100 workers is less than the population.

The expected number of cases of strep throat in each department is :

Expected number of cases in special operations = (6 cases) / 3 departments = 2 cases

Expected number of cases in main floor = (13 cases) / 3 departments = 4 cases

Expected number of cases in management = (5 cases) / 3 departments = 1. 67 cases

The large counts condition is not met as the expected number of cases is not more than 5.

Find out more on conditions for inference at https://brainly.com/question/31689457

#SPJ1

Answer:

Dave ate 3 potato chips with 5/6 pounds then:

3*5/6=5/2 pounds

The sinusoidal equations for each of the six scenarios are listed below:

Case 1: h = 60 - 20 · cos 15t

Case 2: h = 60 - 30 · cos 15t

Case 3: h = 40 - 30 · cos 15t

Case 4: h = 40 - 30 · cos 18t

Case 5: h = 40 - 20 · cos 18t

Case 6: h = 60 - 20 cos 18t

In this problem we need to determine six sinusoidal equations, each associated with a scenario. The sinusoidal model is introduced below:

h = H - 0.5 · D · cos (2π · f · t)

Where:

Case 1

h = 60 - 20 · cos (5π · t)

h = 60 - 20 · cos 15.708t

h = 60 - 20 · cos 15t

Case 2

h = 60 - 30 · cos (5π · t)

h = 60 - 30 · cos 15.708t

h = 60 - 30 · cos 15t

Case 3

h = 40 - 30 · cos (5π · t)

h = 40 - 30 · cos 15.708t

h = 40 - 30 · cos 15t

Case 4

h = 40 - 30 · cos (6π · t)

h = 40 - 30 · cos 18.849t

h = 40 - 30 · cos 18t

Case 5

h = 40 - 20 · cos (6π · t)

h = 40 - 20 · cos 18.849t

h = 40 - 20 · cos 18t

Case 6

h = 60 - 20 · cos (6π · t)

h = 60 - 20 · cos 18.849t

h = 60 - 20 cos 18t

To learn more on sinusoidal equations: https://brainly.com/question/24331583

#SPJ1

The parametric representation for the surface is x = -sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2), y = sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2)/sqrt(2), z = s, where t and s range over appropriate intervals.

To find the parametric representation for the surface, we can use the parameterization method. Since we want the part of the ellipsoid that lies to the left of the xz plane, we can set the x-coordinate as negative. We can parameterize the surface using two parameters, t and s.

Start with the equation of the ellipsoid: x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2 = 1.

Since we want the part of the ellipsoid to the left of the xz plane, we set x as negative. Thus, x = -sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2).

To determine the values of y and z, we need to rearrange the equation of the ellipsoid and solve for y and z in terms of t and s.

Rearranging, we have 2y^2 + 3z^2 = 1 - x^2.

Substitute the value of x from step 2 into the equation above:

2y^2 + 3z^2 = 1 - (-sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2))^2.

Simplifying, we get 2y^2 + 3z^2 = 1 - (1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2).

This simplifies to 2y^2 + 3z^2 = 2t^2 + 3s^2.

Divide both sides of the equation by 2 to get y^2 + (3/2)z^2 = t^2 + (3/2)s^2.

We can rewrite this as y^2 = t^2 + (3/2)s^2 - (3/2)z^2.

Taking the square root of both sides, we have y = sqrt(t^2 + (3/2)s^2 - (3/2)z^2).

Since we want the positive part of the ellipsoid, we can simplify this to y = sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2)/sqrt(2).

Finally, the parametric representation for the surface is:

x = -sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2),

y = sqrt(1 - 2t^2 - 3s^2)/sqrt(2),

z = s,

where t and s range over appropriate intervals.

For more questions like Parametric click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/32252109

#SPJ11

The scale factors are 5.5 and 4/3

The scale factors creates a reduction

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

(x, y) ⇒ (5.5x, 5.5y)

(x, y) ⇒ (4/3x, 4/3y)

In a dilation centered at the origin, the rule is represented as

(x, y) ⇒ (5.5k, 5.5k)

Where

k = scale factor

This means that the scale factors are 5.5 and 4/3

The general rule is that

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

The scale factors creates a reduction because they are greater than 1

Read more about scale factors at

https://brainly.com/question/29229124

#SPJ1

Out of the given options, a cumulative frequency plot would not be a good display to show the clusters in a distribution.

A cumulative frequency plot is a graph that displays the cumulative frequency of a dataset on the y-axis and the values of the variable being measured on the x-axis. While this plot is useful in determining the proportion of data below a certain value, it does not provide clear information about the clusters or distribution of data. A stem and leaf plot, histogram, dotplot, and boxplot are all excellent displays to show the clusters in a distribution as they provide a visual representation of the data distribution, including its shape, center, and spread. These displays can help to identify any outliers, gaps, or patterns in the data, making them useful tools for data analysis.

To know more about frequency visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29739263

#SPJ11

If the exchange rate is 125 yen = $1, a bottle of rice wine that costs 2,500 yen would cost $20.

To convert the cost of the bottle of rice wine from yen to dollars, we need to divide the yen amount by the exchange rate.

Given that the exchange rate is 125 yen = $1, we can calculate the cost in dollars by dividing 2,500 yen by 125 yen/$1.

Dividing 2,500 yen by 125 yen/$1 gives us $20. Therefore, the bottle of rice wine would cost $20.

Thus, the correct answer is option a. $20, as this reflects the accurate conversion based on the given exchange rate.

Learn more about cost here:

https://brainly.com/question/14566816

#SPJ11

The additional time it will take for the liquid's temperature to decrease from 64°F to 32°F is 2 minutes, considering a rate of temperature decrease of 16°F per minute.

To find the additional time it will take for the liquid's temperature to decrease from 64°F to 32°F, we can consider the rate at which the temperature is decreasing.

From the given information, we know that the liquid's temperature decreases from 160°F to 64°F in 6 minutes. This means that the temperature decreases by 160°F - 64°F = 96°F in 6 minutes.

Therefore, the rate of temperature decrease is 96°F / 6 minutes = 16°F per minute.

To find the additional time it will take for the temperature to decrease from 64°F to 32°F, we can calculate the difference in temperature and divide it by the rate of temperature decrease

Temperature difference = 64°F - 32°F = 32°F

Additional time = Temperature difference / Rate of temperature decrease

Additional time = 32°F / 16°F per minute = 2 minutes

Therefore, it will take an additional 2 minutes for the temperature to decrease from 64°F to 32°F.

To know more about temperature:

https://brainly.com/question/7510619

#SPJ4

Approximately 7 singers have joined the initial singer to increase the level from 74 dB to 83 dB.

To calculate the number of singers that have joined the initial singer, we can use the logarithmic nature of the decibel scale. The decibel scale is logarithmic, meaning that an increase of 10 dB represents a tenfold increase in sound intensity.

In this case, we have an increase from 74 dB to 83 dB, which is an increase of 9 dB. Since each singer is equally loud, we can assume that each additional singer adds the same amount of sound intensity.

To find out how many singers have joined, we need to determine how many times 9 dB represents a tenfold increase. We can use the formula:

[tex]10^{\\increase} ^{\\in dB/10)}\\[/tex] = number of singers

Let's calculate it:

[tex]10^{(9/10)[/tex] ≈ 7.94

Therefore, approximately 7 singers have joined the initial singer to increase the level from 74 dB to 83 dB.

To know more about sound intensity check the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/17062836

#SPJ4

The corresponding rectangular equation is: (y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 - (x-1)^2 + 1 = 0

To eliminate the parameter θ, we need to find a way to express θ in terms of x and y. Let's start by rearranging the given equations:
x = 1 + sec θ    ->    sec θ = x - 1    ->    cos θ = 1/(x-1)
y = 2 + tan θ    ->    tan θ = y - 2

Now we can use the identity cos^2 θ = 1 - sin^2 θ to solve for sin θ:
cos^2 θ = 1 - sin^2 θ
(1/(x-1))^2 = 1 - sin^2 θ
sin^2 θ = 1 - (1/(x-1))^2
sin θ = ± sqrt(1 - (1/(x-1))^2)
Note that we take the square root of both sides, and since sin θ is positive in the first and second quadrants, we take the positive square root for 0 ≤ θ < π and the negative square root for π ≤ θ < 2π. Now we can substitute for sin θ and simplify:
If 0 ≤ θ < π:
x - 1 = 1/(cos θ) = 1/sqrt(1 - sin^2 θ) = (x-1)/sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1) = x - 1
(x-1)^2 - 1 = (x-1)^2 - 2(x-1) + 1
y - 2 = tan θ = sin θ/cos θ = ± sqrt(1 - (1/(x-1))^2)/sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
y - 2 = ± sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)/(x-1)
(y - 2)(x-1) = ± sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
(y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 = (x-1)^2 - 1
(y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 - (x-1)^2 + 1 = 0

If π ≤ θ < 2π:
x - 1 = 1/(cos θ) = -1/sqrt(1 - sin^2 θ) = -(x-1)/sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1) = -(x - 1)
(x-1)^2 - 1 = (x-1)^2 + 2(x-1) + 1
y - 2 = tan θ = sin θ/cos θ = ± sqrt(1 - (1/(x-1))^2)/sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
y - 2 = ± sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)/(x-1)
(y - 2)(x-1) = ± sqrt((x-1)^2 - 1)
(y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 = (x-1)^2 - 1
(y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 - (x-1)^2 + 1 = 0

Therefore, the corresponding rectangular equation is:
(y - 2)^2 (x-1)^2 - (x-1)^2 + 1 = 0

To know more about rectangular equation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/3405832

#SPJ11

The equation of the least squares regression line, also known as the line of best fit is y = 7.9 - 0.3x.

To find the equation of the least squares regression line, we need to determine the slope (b) and the y-intercept (a). The slope can be calculated using the formula b = r(sy / sx), where r is the correlation coefficient, sy is the standard deviation of the y-values, and sx is the standard deviation of the x-values.

Given r = -0.2, sy = 3, and sx = 2, we can calculate the slope as b = -0.2(3 / 2) = -0.3.

To find the y-intercept, we use the formula a = y-bar - b(x-bar), where y-bar is the mean of the y-values and x-bar is the mean of the x-values. Given y-bar = 7.1 and x-bar = 5, we can calculate the y-intercept as a = 7.1 - (-0.3)(5) = 7.9.

Learn more about regression here:

https://brainly.com/question/31969332

#SPJ11

The frequency-domain equivalent circuit equation obtained using phasor methods can be used to analyze the behavior of the circuit at different frequencies, and to predict the performance of the circuit under various operating conditions.  

To transform a circuit from the time domain to the frequency domain using phasor methods, follow these steps:

Learn more about circuit equation

https://brainly.com/question/14506661

#SPJ4

Answer: V ≈ 113.04 cubic meters

Step-by-step explanation: We know that the formula for the surface area of a sphere is:

SA = 4πr²

We are given that the surface area of this sphere is 113.04 square meters, so we can set up an equation:

113.04 = 4πr²

To solve for r, we need to isolate it. First, we can divide both sides by 4π:

113.04 ÷ 4π = r²

Simplifying:

r² ≈ 9.013

To solve for r, we can take the square root of both sides:

r ≈ 2.999

Now that we know the radius of the sphere is approximately 3 meters, we can use the formula for the volume of a sphere to find the volume:

V = (4/3)πr³

Substituting our value for r:

V = (4/3)π(2.999)³

Simplifying and rounding to the nearest hundredth:

V ≈ 113.04 cubic meters

Hope that helped!

The value of x in the quadratic equation is 2 or 2

A quadratic equation is a second-order polynomial equation in a single variable x ax²+bx+c=0. with a ≠ 0 .

There are different methods of solving a quadratic equation but in this case we are using the formula method.

x = -b±√b² -4ac)/2a

for the equation x²-4x +4 = 0

a = 1, b = -4 and c = 4

-(-4) ±√ -4² -4×1 × 4)/2

x = 4 ± √ 16-16)/2

x = 4 ± √0)/2

x = 4 /2 or 4/2

x = 2 or 2

Therefore the value of x is 2 or 2

learn more about quadratic equation from

https://brainly.com/question/28038123

#SPJ1

The completed cumulative frequency table is as follows:

Length (cm) Cumulative Frequency

<48.5            0

<53.5            7

<58.5           44

<63.5           77

<68.5           80

To complete the cumulative frequency table based on the given grouped frequency distribution, we can add up the frequencies as we move down the table.

Given:

Length, to the nearest cm:

49-53

54-58

59-63

64-68

Number of kettles:

7

37

33

3

Let's complete the cumulative frequency table:

Length (cm) Cumulative Frequency

<48.5 0

<53.5 7 (frequency of the first group)

<58.5 7 + 37 = 44 (cumulative frequency of the first two groups)

<63.5 44 + 33 = 77 (cumulative frequency of the first three groups)

<68.5 77 + 3 = 80 (cumulative frequency of all groups)

Therefore, the completed cumulative frequency table is as follows:

Length (cm) Cumulative Frequency

<48.5 0

<53.5 7

<58.5 44

<63.5 77

<68.5 80

In the last row, the cumulative frequency is 80, which represents the total number of kettles.

To learn more about the relative frequency;

https://brainly.com/question/29739263

#SPJ1

The complete question:

The table gives the grouped frequency distribution for the lengths

of the electrical cords of 80 kettles.

Length, to the nearest cm

49-53

54-58

59-63

64-68

Number of kettles

7

37

33

3

Complete the cumulative frequency table.

Length (cm)

<48.5

<53.5

<58.5

<63.5

<68.5

Cumulative frequency

0

7

__

The given sequence defined by a1 = 1 and an+1 = 5 - 1/an is increasing, meaning each term is greater than the previous term. Additionally, all terms in the sequence are less than 5.

To prove that the sequence is increasing, we need to show that each term is greater than the previous term. We can do this by induction.

For the base case, a1 = 1.

Now, assuming an > an-1, let's consider an+1:

an+1 = 5 - 1/an

Since an > an-1, 1/an > 1/(an-1), and 5 - 1/an < 5 - 1/(an-1).

From the induction assumption, 5 - 1/(an-1) < 5 - 1/an-1.

Therefore, 5 - 1/an < 5 - 1/(an-1), which means an+1 > an. Hence, the sequence is increasing.

To prove that an < 5 for all n, we can also use induction.

For the base case, a1 = 1 < 5.

Assuming an < 5, let's consider an+1:

an+1 = 5 - 1/an

Since an < 5, 1/an > 1/5.

Therefore, 5 - 1/an < 5 - 1/5 = 4.8.

Hence, an+1 = 5 - 1/an < 4.8, which means an+1 < 5. Thus, an < 5 for all n.

Therefore, we have shown that the sequence defined by a1 = 1 and an+1 = 5 - 1/an is increasing, and all terms in the sequence are less than 5.

Learn more about sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

The test statistic for randomly interviewed a class of 16 students is given by 1.5.

The population mean is given by = µ = 2

The mean of the sample of class of 16 students is given by = 2.3

Length of size of sample is given by = (n) = 16

Standard deviation is given by = (s) = 0.8

So the test statistic for the test with randomly interviewed a class of 16 students is given by

= (mean of sample - µ)/(s/√n)

= (2.3 - 2)/(0.8/√16)

= 0.3/(0.8/4)

= 0.3/0.2

= 3/2

= 1.5

Hence the test statistic is given by 1.5.

To know more about test statistic here

https://brainly.com/question/15110538

#SPJ4

a) The curve that best fits the data is given as follows: Curve 1.

b) The predicted amount after 50 days is given as follows: 198.84 mg.

For a data-set, the definition of a residual is that it is the difference of the actual output value by the predicted output value, that is:

Residual = Observed - Predicted.

Item a:

The curve of best fit should have the lowest residuals, that is, the dots should be as close as possible to the curve, hence curve 1 is the best fit.

Item b:

The curve of best fit is defined as follows:

[tex]y = 546(0.98)^x[/tex]

Hence the expected amount after 50 days is given as follows:

[tex]y = 546(0.98)^{50}[/tex]

y = 198.84 mg.

More can be learned about residuals at brainly.com/question/1447173

#SPJ1

Solving the expressions, resulted to the value of the multiplication

x * y * z = 0.429 (to 3 dp)

To find the value of x * y * z we first need to solve the given equations individually

20ˣ = 16

take the ㏑ of both sides:

x ㏑ 20= ㏑ 16

x = ㏑ 16 / ㏑ 20

x = 0.926

10^y = 20

take ㏑ of both sides:

y ㏑ 10 = ㏑ 20

y = ㏑ 10 / ㏑ 20

y = 0.769

4^z = 10:

take the ㏑ of both sides:

z ㏑ 4 = ㏑ 10

z = ㏑ 4 / ㏑ 10

z = 0.602

solving for x * y * z

x * y * z = 0.926 * 0.769 * 0.602

x * y * z = 0.429

Learn more about Logarithm at

https://brainly.com/question/25710806

#SPJ1

The inequality [tex]$uv^2 \leq (uv)^2$[/tex] holds for any vectors u and v in [tex]R^2[/tex]. Equality holds when the vectors u and v are collinear or when one of them is the zero vector.

To prove the inequality [tex]$uv^2 \leq (uv)^2$[/tex], we can start by expressing the dot product of u and v in terms of their components. Let u = ([tex]u_1, u_2[/tex]) and v = ([tex]v_1, v_2[/tex]).

Then, the dot product of u and v is given by[tex]uv = u_1 v_1 + u_2 v_2[/tex].

Now, consider the squared length of the projection of u onto v.

This can be calculated as [tex](uv)^2[/tex] / [tex]||v||^2[/tex], where ||v|| represents the length of vector v.

Since ||v||^2 = vv, we have [tex](uv)^2[/tex] /[tex]||v||^2[/tex] = [tex](uv)^2[/tex] / ([tex]$v \cdot v$[/tex]).

On the other hand, the squared length of vector u can be expressed as [tex]u\cdot u = u1^2 + u2^2[/tex].

Now, we can compare the two expressions: [tex]uv^2[/tex] and [tex](uv)^2[/tex] / (vv).

By substituting the expression for uv, we get [tex]uv^2[/tex] = [tex](u_1 v_1 + u_2 v_2)^2[/tex], and by substituting the expressions for [tex]||v||^2[/tex] and uu, we get [tex](uv)^2[/tex] / (vv) = ([tex]u_1^2 v_1^2 + u_2^2 v_2^2[/tex]) / ([tex]v_1^2 + v_2^2[/tex]).

It can be shown that [tex](u_1 v_1 + u_2 v_2)^2 \geq (u_1^2 v_1^2 + u_2^2 v_2^2)[/tex] for any real numbers [tex]u_1, u_2, v_1, v_2[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]uv^2[/tex] ≤ [tex](uv)^2[/tex] / [tex](vv)[/tex], which implies [tex]uv^2[/tex] ≤ [tex](uv)^2[/tex].

Equality holds in the inequality [tex]$uv^2 \leq (uv)^2$[/tex] when the vectors u and v are collinear or when one of them is the zero vector.

Geometrically, this inequality represents the fact that the squared length of the projection of vector u onto vector v is always less than or equal to the squared length of the projection of u onto v.

When the vectors are collinear, their projections coincide and the inequality becomes an equality. Similarly, when one of the vectors is the zero vector, its projection onto any other vector is zero, resulting in equality as well.

Learn more about dot product here:

https://brainly.com/question/29097076

#SPJ11