Can I submit NIOS TMA after last date?.

The components of the National Preparedness System provide communities with no reliable or consistent approach for identifying high-priority capability targets.

The answer is: FALSE.

The components of the National Preparedness System

In order to reach the national preparation goal (NPG), municipalities can adopt a method that is outlined in the National Preparedness System (NPS) .

Identify and evaluate risks, estimate capability requirements, develop and maintain capabilities, plan to provide capabilities, verify capabilities, and review and update risks, tools, and resources make up the six parts of NPS. Together, these elements offer communities a method for locating high-priority capability objectives that is dependable and consistent.

Learn more about  National Preparedness System here,

https://brainly.com/question/17095240

#SPJ4

The Total present value of tax savings from the tax deduction if made this year will be: $1509

Total present value of tax savings from the tax deduction if made next year will be: $34113.34

To learn more about tax from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/16423331

#SPJ4

Question

Ramon had an AGI of $165,000 in 2023. he is considering making a charitable contribution this year to the American heart association, a qualified charitable organization. determine the current allowable charitable contribution deduction in each of the following independent situations, and indicate the treatment for any amount that is not deductible currently. identify any planning ideas to minimize Ramon's tax liability. question content area a. a cash gift of $82,500. in the current year, Ramon may deduct $ _______ 1 since his charitable contribution is limited to $ ________ 2 . question content area b. a gift of oak co stock worth $82,500 on the contribution date. Ramon had acquired the stock as an investment two years ago at a cost of $74,250. the stock's value for determining the contribution is $_____________1 . the deduction for 2023 is    2 . the remaining $ 3 for__________ 5 years. question content area c. a gift of a painting worth $82,500 that ramon purchased three years ago for $74,250. the charity has indicated that it would sell the painting to generate cash to fund medical research. the contribution is valued at $__________ 1 . the amount deductible in the current year is $__________ 2 . question content area d. ramon has decided to make a cash gift to the american heart association of $115,500. however, he is considering delaying his gift until the following year when his agi will increase to $300,000 and he will be in the 32% income tax bracket, an increase from his 2023 income tax bracket of 24%. assume a 6% discount rate. the present value factors, at a 6% discount rate, are as follows: year pv factor at 6%  if required, round your final answers to the nearest dollar. Ramon asks you to determine the tax savings from the tax deduction in present value terms if he were to make the gift this year, rather than delay the gift until next year. total present value of tax savings from the tax deduction if made this year: $fill in the blank __________1 total present value of tax savings from the tax deduction if made next year:

Each new Congress's Speaker is chosen by a small minority of the newly elected Representatives from a group of candidates chosen separately by the majority- and minority-party caucuses. These people are chosen by the members of their respective parties at the organizing caucuses held immediately after the election of the current Congress.

Although they don't have to be elected House members, all candidates for speaker must receive the support of their fellow MPs. It merely states that the House "shall choose their Speaker and other offices" in Article I, Section II of the Constitution. The chamber has only ever chosen one of its own members to be speaker, but anyone is eligible. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Kentucky Senator Rand Paul both won votes for speaker earlier this year. A majority of the votes cast by the present and voting members of the House are required. This means that even though a majority in the House is 218 votes, a speaker could be elected with fewer votes if a number of members are absent.

Learn more about Speaker from

brainly.com/question/12291555

#SPJ4

Each new Congress's Speaker is chosen by a small minority of the newly elected Representatives from a group of candidates chosen separately by the majority- and minority-party caucuses. These people are chosen by the members of their respective parties at the organizing caucuses held immediately after the election of the current Congress.

Although they don't have to be elected House members, all candidates for speaker must receive the support of their fellow MPs. It merely states that the House "shall choose their Congress's Speaker  and other offices" in Article I, Section II of the Constitution. The chamber has only ever chosen one of its own members to be speaker, but anyone is eligible. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Kentucky Senator Rand Paul both won votes for speaker earlier this year. A majority of the votes cast by the present and voting members of the House are required. This means that even though a majority in the House is 218 votes, a speaker could be elected with fewer votes if a number of members are absent.

Learn more about Speaker from

brainly.com/question/12291555

#SPJ4

In the united states, there are 5 kinds of mass media that are critical in politics. they may be tv, newspapers, radio, magazines, and the net.

The 3 sorts of media are normally known as information media, social media, and internet media, but you might additionally see them referred to as earned media, shared media, and owned media.

Some different styles of cutting-edge media are print media, television, films, and video games.

Mass media and American politics covers the position of newspapers, magazines, radio, tv, and social media from the colonial technology to the existing.

Learn more about media here: https://brainly.com/question/26152499

#SPJ4

Holding nomination elections prevent having multiple candidates from the same party competing with one another in a general election

Election nomination rules set forth the requirements that must be met before a candidate or political party may run for office. As opposed to active suffrage, which is the right to vote, which is the right to vote, the right to run for office is sometimes referred to as passive suffrage.

The selection of a candidate for an honour or prize, or for election to a public office, includes the nomination procedure. A short list is a selection of nominees that has been trimmed down from the full list of candidates.

To learn more about election visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/15206571

#SPJ4

Under our device of the presidency, the president's authority to trouble such orders (or to engage in some other form of unilateral govt motion) must come from the charter or federal regulation.

Govt Orders are issued by using the White residence and are used to direct the govt department of the U.S. government.

Govt Orders country mandatory necessities for the government department, and have the impact of regulation.

Consequently, a President can difficulty an executive order to pass Congress' paperwork and develop policy objectives without having to undergo the legislative procedure. A govt memorandum is like an executive order, but it does not have the same procedural necessities.

Learn more about President here: brainly.com/question/25608255

#SPJ4

An organization of people with similar interests in order to control the government, influence policy, and win elections is known as a political party. In an effort to form a majority in the legislature, political parties nominate candidates and assist their members in winning office.

A political party is a group that organizes candidates to run for office in a given nation. Parties may support particular ideologies or political objectives, and it is typical for party members to share similar political views. As contemporary party organizations evolved and spread throughout the world over the past few centuries, political parties have grown to play a significant role in the politics of practically every nation. Unpolitical parties are relatively uncommon in a nation. While some nations only have one political party, others have many. Both democracies and autocracies use parties in their political systems, however democracies often have more political parties than do autocracies. Political scientists who believe that competition between two or more parties is an essential component of democracy believe that autocracies frequently have a single party in power. Parties can emerge from social divisions that already exist, such as those between the poorer and upper classes, and by promoting cooperation among their members, they simplify the political decision-making process. Political parties typically consist of a party leader who is in charge of the party's operations, party executives who have the power to choose the leader and who handle administrative and organizational duties, and party members who can lend a hand by volunteering, giving money to the party, and casting ballots for its candidates.

Learn more about political party here

https://brainly.com/question/29557623

#SPJ4

Exempt Employees are salaried workers in management or supervisory roles who are exempt from the Wage and Hour Law's maximum hour and overtime compensation rules.

Employees who are exempt from the FLSA are usually paid salaries that are more than a specific threshold and hold positions in administration, professional, executive, computer, or outside sales. Employers can determine who qualifies for this exemption by using the responsibilities test provided by the Department of Labor (DOL).

Exempt and non-exempt employees are distinguished primarily by their eligibility for overtime pay. The Fair Labor Standards Act determines such status in accordance with federal law (FLSA). While non-exempt employees are eligible to overtime, exempt employees are not.

Learn more about Exempt Employees: https://brainly.com/question/23275487

#SPJ4

The officer needs no other authority or justification than department policy.

We may be pulled over by the police and asked to submit to a breath test. When they believe we are driving after drinking, they act in this manner.

Without a valid reason, we risk being arrested if we refuse to take the breathalyser. Results of the breath test are available right away.

In the event of a traffic infraction, such as exceeding the speed limit, running a red light, or driving without our driver's licence and vehicle papers, a traffic police officer has the right to take our vehicle.

If a traffic officer determines that we have committed a traffic infraction, such as driving while intoxicated or using an illegal substance, they have the right to arrest us without a warrant.

To know more about warrant, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14893433

#SPJ4

Election participation, military service, community service, involvement in politics, and holding public office are all examples of civic responsibility.

some ways that people can carry out their civic responsibilities in the modern United States like Voting in elections, joining the military, doing community service, being involved in politics, and holding public office are a few examples of civic responsibility. people also paying taxes, participating on a jury, or testifying in court are all examples of upholding the law of the land as a civic responsibility.

To know more about  civic responsibility visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2377157

#SPJ4

I think a woman's role in patriarchal society is to be seen and not heard and maintain in position as stay-at-home mother and bear the load of childcare household chores and everything that comes with it.

Having read with great pleasure a pamphlet that you have recently published," wrote Wollstonecraft in her dedication to Talleyrand in the Rights of Woman.

I dedicate this volume to you; to induce you to reconsider the subject, and maturely weigh what I have advanced concerning the rights of woman and national education. The issue of women's rights became a focal point of political discussions in both France and Britain after French feminist Olympe de Gouges released her Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen at the end of 1791.The points made by Wollstonecraft in The Rights of Men are expanded upon in The Rights of Woman. As implied by the title, she addresses the rights of specific men British men of the eighteenth century in The Rights of Men.

learn more about Wollstonecraft's purpose here:

https://brainly.com/question/29612571

#SPJ4

The Uniform Commercial Code, option (c), was created to standardize and streamline the regulations that apply to companies engaged in interstate commerce.

To protect everyone participating in commerce, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) was developed. It was created to synchronize interstate commerce, whether it be between individuals or businesses.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a collection of nine (9) articles that governs investments, bank transactions, bills of lading, and the sale and leasing of products among the states of the United States. Although the UCC is not a federal law, it is usually regarded as applicable to commercial activity in all 50 states.

The quantity, together with the offer, the type of the task, the price, and the performance, must all be specified in the contract, contrary to the UCC. Even in the absence of consideration, merchant offers may be non-revocable under the UCC.

Learn more about Uniform Commercial Code: https://brainly.com/question/28197050

#SPJ4

The correct question is:

Which of the following was designed to simplify and standardize the laws affecting businesses involved in interstate trade?

(a). the standardized commerce rules

(b). statutory law

(c). the Uniform Commercial Code

(d). common law

Cases involving the United States government, the Constitution or federal statutes, including disputes between states or between the U.S. government and foreign governments, fall under the purview of federal courts.

The judicial branch decides whether federal legislation are constitutional as well as other legal challenges. Judges, however, rely on the executive department of our government to carry out court orders. What actually occurred and what should be done about it are decided by the courts.

Because federal courts only have limited jurisdiction, they can only consider matters that are specifically allowed by the US Constitution or federal law. Any case originating under federal laws, the Constitution, or treaties must be filed with the federal district court.

To learn more about Federal Laws Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16849808

#SPJ4

King Claudius shows re-gret for his previous actions in Act 3 of "Hamlet." Given that he has acknowledged his er-rors and modified his behaviour, this demonstrates his comp-lexity as a person.

King Claudius is a fict-itious character and the anta-gonist in Shakespeare's trag-edy Hamlet. He was the uncle and eventually the stepfather of Prince Hamlet. In addition, he is Ger-trude's second husband, the King's brother, and King Hamlet. He obtained the Da-nish throne by p-oisoning his brother to de-ath & then being married to a late king's wid-ow. He is partially based on Ju-tish chieftain Fe-ng, who was depicted in the Ge-sta Dano-rum & the Chr-onicon Let-hrense by Sa-xo Gram-maticus. A mo-narch has never truly held the title of "Da-nish King."

To know more about Claudius:

brainly.com/question/24958593

#SPJ4

Yes, the license will be suspended as soon as you are arrested for DUI.

Driving  under the influence (DUI) and/or driving while intoxicated (DWI) are criminal  offenses in all states. These offenses include dangerous driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other controlled substances.

In states that charge only  DUI or DWI offenses, the two terms are often colloquially used interchangeably. In states where both crimes are charged, DUI charges typically relate to incidents involving alcohol, while DWI charges typically relate to incidents involving recreational or prescription drugs.

Some jurisdictions prohibit impaired driving throughout the  state, while others limit it to public roads and areas open to the public.

law enforcement agencies may require chemical testing of  breath, blood, or urine of drivers if police suspect that the driver is impaired. This suspicion  usually arises when the police witness dangerous or erratic driving.

To learn more about DUI, refer;

https://brainly.com/question/8020339

#SPJ4

The truth was attempting to persuade human beings that ladies, black or white, must be treated as identical to men. They have to have rights much like guys.

“Ain't I A girl?” is the textual content of a speech she delivered in 1851 at the ladies's conference in Akron, Ohio. The ladies in attendance were being challenged to call for the right to vote. The cause of the speech is to steer the target audience that giving girls the proper to vote is common feel.

Her use of repetition essentially makes her factor regarded to the audience. It may additionally serve as a rallying phrase for the target market.

Learn more about truth here: https://brainly.com/question/11104264

#SPJ4

Supreme court generally consider whether the lower court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling.

When determining which cases to examine, the Supreme Court typically gives great weight to whether a lower court decision conflicts with a previous decision by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court would consent to hear a matter if four of its nine justices agreed to grant a petition. Given that the Supreme Court only accepts an average of 100 of the roughly 5000 cases received for review each year, the issue is neither simple nor common. So, certainly, the question of whether the lower court's decision in the case clashes with a previous Supreme Court decision is one that the Supreme Court often considers extremely relevant when determining which cases to review.

To know more about Supreme Court refer:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ4

Disclaimer- Complete question is-

Which factor does the supreme court generally consider especially important when deciding which cases to review?

A. Whether the cases involve any federal governments employees

B. Weather judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's original ruling

C. Weather the lower-court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling

D. Whether the cases originated in the states or federal court system

One of the best incentive is additional paid time off, and it can also benefit the company. This incentive not only gives diligent workers a much-needed respite, but it also increases production over the long term.

Among other things, a well-designed incentive program has a clearly defined target, specifies rules, makes incentives obvious, focuses on goal commitment, encourages competition, and makes use of risk. The top ten strategies for boosting the impact of incentives are further examined below.

According to the definition, an incentive inspires or motivates someone to do a task. A reward is something that is given as a token of appreciation for hard work, dedication, or achievement. It can also be a fair remuneration for decency.

When it comes to employees, rewards and incentives at work are advantageous to both employers and employees. When employers reward workers for their performance and productivity, employee morale, work happiness, and motivation can all be increased.

Rewards should have compelling incentives to encourage subjects to do tasks effectively and swiftly.

To know more about effective incentives, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/2437324

#SPJ4

Judicial activism describes decisions that appear to be made more in accordance with personal judgment than with the letter or spirit of the law.

By definition, judicial activism refers to the way a justice conducts judicial review in which they forego their duty to read the Constitution in favor of making decisions that advance their chosen policies.

A thing is said to be "judicial" if it refers to, relates to, or has to do with a judge or the court. A judicial proceeding, for instance, is one that a judge preside over.

History professor Arthur Schlesinger Jr. first used the term "judicial activism" in 1947. Judicial activism refers to a judge's decision that disregards the law or earlier constitutional interpretations in favor of upholding an individual's rights or furthering a larger political agenda.

To learn more about Judicial activism refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/509532

#SPJ4

Under the United States are 13 appellate courts. They are known as the US Supreme Court. Appeals courts. Twelve regional circuits, each with an appeals court, make up the 94 federal judicial districts.

The Court of Appeals for each circuit hears appeals of decisions made in American courts. inside the circuit, district courts. The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals brings the total number of federal appellate courts to 13. Only specific categories of cases are accepted by this court from around the country.

The primary responsibility of the Court of Appeals is to exercise appellate jurisdiction over all matters that do not come under the original and sole jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Learn more about US Supreme Court here:

brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ4

The above statement stands false. With respect to immigration law, fines and imprisonment, and a bar from government contracts may be imposed on an employee who engages in a pattern or practice of violation.

The Immigration and Nationality Act forbids employers from discriminating against U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, and authorized aliens based on national origin when hiring, firing, recruiting, or referring for a fee, or based on citizenship status when hiring, firing, or referring for a fee, against U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, and the following classes of aliens with work authorization: permanent residents, temporary residents (i.e., people who have gone through the legal.

Federal immigration law mandates that since 1986, employers may only employ those who are legally permitted to work in the United States. Employers are required by law to confirm each new hire's identification and eligibility for employment.

To know more about immigration law  click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29551652

#SPJ4

Dmitry & Mohammed sued Outback Batteries for their part in causing injury to students. Outback challenged lawsuit against it, claiming that there was no personal jurisdiction over it. Thus Outback should be dismissed from lawsuit.

About Lawsuit

A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which a plaintiff asks a court for a legal remedy or an equitable remedy. The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgement will be rendered in their favour, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, and impose a temporarily or permanently injunction to stop or compel an action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.

To know more about lawsuit:

brainly.com/question/18273856

#SPJ4

Correct answer is C). the secretary for homeland security is the president most wanted to consult for any advice regrading how to take the advantage for the strengths for various service and branches when there are conducting a military kind of operation.

The Secretary of Homeland Security leads the 0.33 biggest Department of the U.S. government, with a team of workers of 229,000 personnel and 22 additives consisting of TSA, Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, FEMA, the Coast Guard, Secret Service, Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, the National Protection and Programs Directorate, and the Science and Technology Directorate.

Under the Secretary's leadership, DHS is chargeable for counterterrorism, cybersecurity, aviation security, border security, port security, maritime security, management and enforcement of our immigration laws, safety of our country wide leaders, safety of vital infrastructure, cybersecurity, detection of and safety towards chemical, organic and nuclear threats to the homeland, and reaction to disasters.

Learn more about homeland security visit: brainly.com/question/16504850

#SPJ4

The bill is referred to another committee in the Senate and, if it is released, is the subject of debate and voting. Again, the bill is approved by a simple majority (51 of 100).

Finally, any discrepancies between the Senate and House versions of the bill are resolved by a conference committee comprised of members of both chambers.

The same law must receive a majority vote in both the House and Senate in order to be approved and sent to the President awaiting signature. If a law is vetoed by the president, it can be overridden by passing it once more in every chamber that have at least 2/3rd of the members present voting in favour.

To know more about simple majority:

brainly.com/question/373926

#SPJ4

Freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly are among the fundamental liberties that the First Amendment defends, according to a close reading of the document. Establishing the boundaries of these freedoms has been challenging, making it difficult to interpret the amendment. Throughout American history, the definitions have changed, and the process is still in progress.

Let us discuss the rights in detail

The establishment provision of the First Amendment forbids the government from founding a recognised church, and the free exercise clause permits people to practise their religion as they see fit, and guarantees religious freedom. Youll note that neither the First Amendment nor any other part of the Constitution contains the term separation of church and state. Most people are unaware that Thomas Jefferson actually came up with the phrase afterwards. He stated in a letter sent in 1802, while he was still in office, that the First Amendments freedom of religion provision was intended to erect wall of separation between Church and State.

One of the most precious liberties is the right to free expression, although this right frequently clashes with other rights and liberties. A fundamental principle for determining the parameters of free expression is the clear and present danger test. The well-known Schenck v. United States decision from World War I served as its precedent. Charles Schenck, an antiwar activist, was detained after distributing pamphlets urging potential army draftees to disregard their draught notices. The court agreed with the United States that Schenck threatened national security. The idea that a person is clear and present danger to American safety precluded free speech protection developed.

The rights to petition and assemble are closely tied to the rights to free speech and have historically been safeguarded similarly. Charles Evans Hughes, a former chief justice, penned the following Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be rendered a crime In general, such a viewpoint has won over. If an assembly disturbs the peace, quiet, or ability to conduct regular business, it must be weighed against the rights of other individuals. Usually, a group must request a permit, but if officials have the tools to stop significant disruptions, they must give a permit.

To know more about amendments visit:

https://brainly.com/question/687600

#SPJ4

In basic parliamentary law, the maker/presenter of any debatable motion is entitled to speak in debate first.

In Parliament he motion's author has the right to speak first during debate. Members are then summoned in the order that they are acknowledged by the chair, with those who have yet to speak being called before those who have.

If it is practicable, the person in the chair who is for and against the motion alternates.

The first member to stand up and address the chair after another member has given the floor (by sitting down) is often the one who has the right to speak.

The following are exceptions to this general rule: In debate over a motion, the one who proposed it has the right to speak first.

The first two minutes of each speaker's eight-minute address are taken up by actual information, while the third minute is devoted to a rebuttal.

After that, both sides each give a four-minute "reply speech," with the last word going to the Proposition.

To know more about Parliament, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2873905

#SPJ4

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) established federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal protection clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. Nor will any State... refuse to any individual inside its control the equal protection under the law, according to the provision, which came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866, that promised that all people would have the right to equal protection under the law, served as the primary inspiration for this clause's inclusion.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398442

#SPJ4

If a bill has passed in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate and has been approved by the President, or if a presidential veto has been overridden, the bill becomes a law and is enforced by the government.

What is a law?

The exact meaning of law is up for debate, but it is generally understood to be a set of regulations that are made and enforced by social or governmental institutions to control behavior. It has been called both a science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts. Statutes can be created by a group of legislators or a single lawmaker; the administration can issue decrees and regulations; or judges can set precedent, mainly in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals have the power to enact legally binding agreements, such as arbitration clauses that substitute alternative dispute resolution procedures for traditional court action.

To learn more about Law refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/6534668

#SPJ4

When a committee chairman recommends a measure, that is the stage in the legislative process that most likely guarantees that it will be discussed in the House of Representatives.

In addition to overseeing ongoing government operations, committees are also responsible for identifying issues that call for legislative investigation, gathering and analyzing data, and recommending a course of action to the Senate.

Following the hearings, the measure is discussed in a session referred to as the "mark-up" session. The committee members carefully consider the arguments made. The members of the committee may vote to approve or reject amendments made to the bill.

A Representative first sponsors the bill. A committee is then charged with studying the bill. The measure is placed on a calendar to be voted on, discussed, or altered after it has been issued by the committee. The bill goes to the Senate if it receives a simple majority (218 votes out of 435).

Learn more about legislative process: https://brainly.com/question/12812357

#SPJ4