A linear programming problem in which is (B) There are multiple optimal solutions.
In this linear programming problem, the objective is to maximize the function 20X + 30Y, subject to the constraints X + Y ≤ 80 and 6X + 12Y ≤ 600, with the additional restrictions X, Y ≥ 20.
To determine the answer, let's analyze the problem:
No feasible solution: This answer choice can be eliminated because the problem includes feasible solutions. The constraints allow for values of X and Y that satisfy the conditions.
Multiple optimal solutions: In this case, multiple combinations of X and Y would result in the same maximum value of the objective function. To determine if this is true, we need to find the feasible region and identify points within it that give the same maximum value.
Cannot be solved graphically: This answer choice can also be eliminated because the problem can be solved graphically by plotting the feasible region and finding the corner points that satisfy the constraints.
Since there are multiple corner points within the feasible region, it means there are multiple combinations of X and Y that give the same maximum value of the objective function. Therefore, the correct answer is that there are multiple optimal solutions.
To know more about linear programming click here :
https://brainly.com/question/32952696
#SPJ4
Suppose you decide to flip a coin until you get a heads (H), at which point you will stop flipping the coin. However. you will fip at most three times. even if you never get a heads. Let the random variable X be the number of times you flip the coin. Our gozl is to find the probability distribution of X. In other words, we would like to create a table that lints all the possible values of x and the corresponding probabilities. Well follow the same 5 teps We followed in the two examples we solved
The probability distribution of X is as shown in the table: 1 with a probability of 1/2, 2 with a probability of 1/4, and 3 with a probability of 1/8.
When flipping a coin until getting heads, we are interested in the number of flips required, represented by the random variable X. In this scenario, we are limited to a maximum of three flips, even if heads doesn't appear.
In the first flip, there are two possible outcomes: heads (H) or tails (T). The probability of getting heads on the first flip is 1/2, as there is an equal chance of getting either heads or tails.
If heads doesn't appear on the first flip, we proceed to the second flip. At this point, we have two possibilities: heads on the second flip or tails again. Since the probability of getting heads on a single flip is 1/2, the probability of getting tails twice in a row is (1/2) * (1/2) = 1/4.
If heads hasn't appeared after the second flip, we move to the third and final flip. The possibilities now are: heads on the third flip or tails for the third time. Again, the probability of getting heads on a single flip is 1/2, so the probability of getting tails for the third time is (1/2) * (1/2) * (1/2) = 1/8.
Learn more about Probability
brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
HMK Company is producing refining and packaging raw sugar into two different types, (Whity X) and (Browny Y). How much is the maximum approximate profit that the company can attain given the following Profit equation 3X + 2Y Production constraints: 10X+4Y 20 4Y ≤ 16 X ≤ 1 12.5 13.5 9.8 12.8
We are given the following information: HMK Company is producing refining and packaging raw sugar into two different types, (Whity X) and (Browny Y).
The profit equation is given as: Profit equation: 3X + 2YLet's solve the production constraints one by one:
Constraint 1: 10X + 4Y ≤ 20Let's plot this inequality on a graph:
graph{(y(-2/5))[-5,5](-10x+20)/4 [-5,5]}As we can see from the graph, the feasible region for this constraint is the triangular area below the line 10X + 4Y = 20,
and to the left of the y-axis and below the x-axis.
Constraint 2: 4Y ≤ 16Let's plot this inequality on a graph: graph{(y(-4))[-5,5](-10x+20)/4 [-5,5]}
As we can see from the graph, the feasible region for this constraint is the rectangular area to the left of the y-axis and below the line Y = 4.Constraint 3: X ≤ 1
Let's plot this inequality on a graph:
graph{(y(-5))[-5,5]x<=1 [-5,5]}As we can see from the graph, the feasible region for this constraint is the triangular area below the line X = 1,
and to the left of the y-axis and above the x-axis.
Constraint 4: Y ≤ 12.5Let's plot this inequality on a graph: graph {(y(-15))[-5,5]x<=1 [-5,5]}
As we can see from the graph, the feasible region for this constraint is the rectangular area to the left of the y-axis and below the line Y = 12.5.Constraint 5: 9.8 ≤ X ≤ 12.8
Let's plot this inequality on a graph: graph{(y(-15))[-5,5]9.8<=x<=12.8 [-5,5]}As we can see from the graph, the feasible region for this constraint is the rectangular area between the vertical lines X = 9.8 and X = 12.8,
to the left of the y-axis.
Now, let's find the coordinates of the corners of the feasible region (where all the constraints intersect):graph{(y(-15))[-5,5]9.8<=x<=12.8 [-5,5]}
As we can see from the graph, the coordinates of the corners of the feasible region are:(9.8, 0), (10, 1.5), (12.5, 12.5), (12.8, 0)Now, let's calculate the profit for each corner of the feasible region
:Corner 1: (9.8, 0)Profit = 3(9.8) + 2(0) = 29.4Corner 2: (10, 1.5)Profit = 3(10) + 2(1.5) = 32Corner 3: (12.5, 12.5)Profit = 3(12.5) + 2(12.5) = 50Corner 4: (12.8, 0)Profit = 3(12.8) + 2(0) = 38.4
Therefore, the maximum approximate profit that the company can attain is $50. Ans: 50.
brainly.com/question/31468092
#SPJ11
Suppose the correlation coefficient is 0.9. The percentage of variation in the response variable explained by the variation in the explanatory variable is A. 0.81% B. 81% C. 90% D. none of the other answers OE. 8.1% OF. 9% G. 0.90% H. 0% ETTE
The percentage of variation in the response variable explained by the variation in the explanatory variable is 81%.
The correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. In this case, if the correlation coefficient is 0.9, it indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable.
The square of the correlation coefficient, also known as the coefficient of determination (r²), represents the proportion of the variation in the response variable that can be explained by the variation in the explanatory variable.
Therefore, if the correlation coefficient is 0.9, the coefficient of determination is (0.9)² = 0.81.
This means that 81% of the variation in the response variable can be explained by the variation in the explanatory variable.
In other words, the strength of the linear relationship between the two variables allows us to explain 81% of the variability in the response variable based on the explanatory variable.
Learn more about variation
brainly.com/question/17287798
#SPJ11
The following refers to the results after the 5 and 10 day treatments. Statistical methods were used to adjust for the difference in treatment groups at baseline. Results: By day 14, a clinical improvement of 2 points or more on the ordinal scale occurred in 64% of patients in the 5-day group and in 54% in the 10-day group. After adjustment for baseline clinical status, patients in the 10-day group had a distribution in clinical status at day 14 that was similar to that among patients in the 5-day group (P=0.14). b. Remember that when comparing two groups, the Null Hypothesis always gives the state that the two things are equal, and the alternate is the change we are looking for, or in this case, a difference time to recovery in the groups after treatment. Does the P-value of 0.14 indicate that there is a difference in time to recovery between those that take the drug for 5 and 10 days. Give specific hypothesis test reasoning.
The p-value of 0.14 suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in time to recovery between patients who took the drug for 5 days and those who took it for 10 days.
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no difference or no effect, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) suggests the presence of a difference or effect. In this case, the null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in time to recovery between the two treatment groups, and the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a difference in time to recovery.
To determine the significance of the results, a hypothesis test was conducted. The p-value is the probability of observing a result as extreme as the one obtained, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In this case, a p-value of 0.14 means that if the null hypothesis is true (i.e., there is no difference in time to recovery), there is a 14% chance of obtaining a result as extreme or more extreme than the one observed.
Typically, a significance level (α) is chosen as a threshold to determine whether the p-value is considered statistically significant. Commonly used values for α are 0.05 or 0.01. If the p-value is less than the chosen α value, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than the α value, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the p-value of 0.14 is greater than the commonly used significance levels of 0.05 or 0.01. Therefore, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in time to recovery between the 5-day and 10-day treatment groups.
It is important to note that a p-value above the significance level does not prove that there is no difference; it simply means that we do not have enough evidence to conclude that there is a difference based on the data at hand. Further studies with larger sample sizes or different methodologies may be required to obtain more conclusive results.
Learn more about p-value here
https://brainly.com/question/4621112
#SPJ11
Suppose that Z follows the standard normal distribution, i.e. Z ∼ n(x; 0, 1). Find
(a) P(Z<0.45)
(b) P(-1.3≤Z≤ 3.5)
(c) P(Z>1.25)
(d) P(-0.15
(e) P(Z≤2)
(f) P(|Z|>2.565)
(g) P(|Z|<2.33)
Suppose that Z follows the standard normal distribution, i.e. Z ∼ n(x; 0, 1) the values to be found are as follows:
A) P(Z<0.45) ≈ 0.6736
B) P(-1.3≤Z≤3.5) ≈ 0.9088
C) P(Z>1.25) ≈ 0.1056
D) P(-0.15<Z) ≈ 0.5596
E) P(Z≤2) ≈ 0.9772
F) P(|Z|>2.565) ≈ 0.0106
G) P(|Z|<2.33) ≈ 0.9905
(a) To find P(Z<0.45), we need to calculate the probability that the standard normal distribution is less than 0.45. This can be found using a standard normal distribution table or using a statistical calculator, which gives the probability as approximately 0.6736.
(b) To find P(-1.3≤Z≤3.5), we need to calculate the probability that Z lies between -1.3 and 3.5. This can be calculated by finding the area under the standard normal curve between these two values. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find the probability as approximately 0.9088.
(c) To find P(Z>1.25), we need to calculate the probability that Z is greater than 1.25. This can be found by subtracting the probability of Z being less than or equal to 1.25 from 1. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find the probability as approximately 0.1056.
(d) To find P(-0.15<Z), we need to calculate the probability that Z is greater than -0.15. This is equivalent to finding the probability that Z is less than or equal to -0.15, and subtracting it from 1. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find the probability as approximately 0.5596.
(e) To find P(Z≤2), we need to calculate the probability that Z is less than or equal to 2. This can be found using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, which gives the probability as approximately 0.9772.
(f) To find P(|Z|>2.565), we need to calculate the probability that the absolute value of Z is greater than 2.565. Since the standard normal distribution is symmetric, this is equivalent to finding the probability that Z is less than -2.565 or greater than 2.565. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find the probability as approximately 0.0106.
(g) To find P(|Z|<2.33), we need to calculate the probability that the absolute value of Z is less than 2.33. This can be found by subtracting the probability of Z being greater than 2.33 from the probability of Z being less than -2.33. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find the probability as approximately 0.9905.
You can learn more about standard normal distribution at
https://brainly.com/question/4079902
#SPJ11
The compressive strength of concrete is being tested by a civil engineer who tested 12 specimens and obtained the following data: 2216 2237 2225 2301 2318 2255 2249 2204 2281 2263 2275 2295 Construct a 95% confidence interval on the mean strength.
Lower limit Upper Limit
The 95% confidence interval for the mean strength of concrete based on the given data is [2222.32, 2284.32]. This means we are 95% confident that the true mean strength of concrete falls within this range.
To calculate the confidence interval, we first find the sample mean, which is the average of the 12 specimens: (2216 + 2237 + 2225 + 2301 + 2318 + 2255 + 2249 + 2204 + 2281 + 2263 + 2275 + 2295) / 12 = 2253.75.
Next, we calculate the standard deviation of the sample data, which measures the variability within the sample. The standard deviation is 39.94. Since the sample size is relatively small (n = 12) and the population standard deviation is unknown, we use the t-distribution to calculate the confidence interval. With 11 degrees of freedom (n - 1), the t-value for a 95% confidence level is approximately 2.201.
Finally, we calculate the margin of error by multiplying the t-value with the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size: 2.201 * (39.94 / sqrt(12)) ≈ 30.5.
The lower limit of the confidence interval is the sample mean minus the margin of error: 2253.75 - 30.5 = 2223.25.
The upper limit of the confidence interval is the sample mean plus the margin of error: 2253.75 + 30.5 = 2284.25.
Thus, the 95% confidence interval on the mean strength of concrete is [2222.32, 2284.32].
LEARN MORE ABOUT confidence interval here: brainly.com/question/32546207
#SPJ11
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as y=55.55x+90.57 and the r=0.7. What percentage of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x ? r2=% (Report exact answer, and do not enter the \% sign)
This means that 49% of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in x according to the regression equation. r^2 may not fully capture the complexity of the relationship between the variables and should always be interpreted in conjunction with other statistical measures and a thorough understanding of the data and context.
The coefficient of determination, denoted as r^2, is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable (y) that can be explained by the independent variable (x). It ranges between 0 and 1 and provides an indication of how well the regression line fits the data points.
To calculate r^2 from the given information, we simply square the correlation coefficient: r^2 = 0.7^2 = 0.49. This means that 49% of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in x according to the regression equation.
In other words, if we were to draw a line through the scatter plot that best fits the data, that line explains 49% of the variability in y. The remaining 51% of the variability in y is due to factors other than x that are not captured by the regression equation.
It's important to note that while r^2 can be a useful measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables, it does not indicate causation. Additionally, r^2 may not fully capture the complexity of the relationship between the variables and should always be interpreted in conjunction with other statistical measures and a thorough understanding of the data and context.
Learn more about variation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29773899
#SPJ11
(10 points) Prove or disprove: The function f:[0,1]→R defined by f(x)={ xsin( x
1
)
0
if 0
if x=0
is uniformly continuous. Hint: You may use that sin(x) and 1/x are continuous functions on their domains of definition. What is the issue?
The given function is defined by
[tex]f(x)={ xsin(1/x) 0[/tex]
if [tex]0 if x=0.[/tex]
For uniform continuity, we have to show that for every
[tex]$\epsilon>0$[/tex]
there exists a [tex]$\delta>0$[/tex]
such that [tex]$|x-y|<\delta$[/tex]
implies [tex]$|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$[/tex] .
Let [tex]$x,y\in[0,1]$[/tex]
without loss of generality assume that [tex]$x0$[/tex] , if we choose
[tex]$\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{1+y}$[/tex],
we have that if [tex]$|x-y|<\delta$[/tex] ,
then[tex]$$|f(x)-f(y)|≤(1+y)\delta=(1+y)\frac{\epsilon}{1+y}=\epsilon$$[/tex] .
The issue here is at $x=0$; $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$.
To know more about not continuous visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31523914
#SPJ11
A force of 12lb is required to hold a spring stretched 1/2ft beyond its natural length. Which of the following integrals represents the amount of work done in stretching it from its natural length to 2/3ft beyond its natural length? ∫ 0
2/3
24xdx ∫ 0
2/3
36xdx ∫ 0
2/3
12dx ∫ 1/2
2/3
24xdx ∫ 1/2
2/3
36xdx
The correct option is ∫ 0
2/3
24xdx.
To determine the integral that represents the amount of work done in stretching the spring from its natural length to 2/3 ft beyond its natural length, we need to consider the relationship between the force and displacement.
The work done by a force is given by the integral of the force multiplied by the displacement. In this case, the force required to hold the spring stretched 1/2 ft beyond its natural length is 12 lb. We can assume that the force is proportional to the displacement.
Let's denote the displacement of the spring as x (measured in feet) from its natural length. The force required to stretch the spring at any given displacement x is given by:
F(x) = kx
where k is the spring constant. Since we know that a force of 12 lb is required to hold the spring stretched 1/2 ft beyond its natural length, we can use this information to determine the value of k:
F(1/2) = k(1/2) = 12
k = 24 lb/ft
Now, to find the work done in stretching the spring from its natural length to 2/3 ft beyond its natural length, we need to integrate the force F(x) over the displacement range [0, 2/3]:
Work = ∫(0 to 2/3) F(x) dx
Substituting the force equation, we have:
Work = ∫(0 to 2/3) (24x) dx
Integrating this expression yields:
Work = 12x^2 ∣(0 to 2/3)
Work = 12 * (2/3)^2 - 12 * (0)^2
Work = 12 * (4/9)
Work = 16/3 lb-ft
Comparing this result to the given options, we find that the integral representing the amount of work done in stretching the spring from its natural length to 2/3 ft beyond its natural length is:
∫ 0
2/3
24xdx
Therefore, the correct option is ∫ 0
2/3
24xdx.
Visit here to learn more about integral brainly.com/question/31059545
#SPJ11
Find the median from the following data set: 58, 12, 78, 73, 2,
8, 79, 36, 62, 97, 46 & 90.
Leave the answer to the nearest tenth place if applicable.
The median of the given data set is 60 is the answer.
To find the median of a data set, we need to arrange the numbers in ascending order and determine the middle value. If there is an odd number of values, the median is the middle value. If there is an even number of values, the median is the average of the two middle values.
Arranging the given data set in ascending order:
2, 8, 12, 36, 46, 58, 62, 73, 78, 79, 90, 97
Since there are 12 values, which is an even number, we need to find the average of the two middle values.
The middle values are the 6th and 7th numbers: 58 and 62.
To find the median, we calculate the average of these two values:
Median = (58 + 62) / 2 = 60
Therefore, the median of the given data set is 60.
know more about median
https://brainly.com/question/300591
#SPJ11
According to the University of Nevada Center for Logistics Management, 6% of all merchandise sold in the United States gets returned. A Houston department store sampled 80 items sold in January and found that 10 of the items were returned.
(a) Construct a point estimate of the proportion of items returned for the population ofsales transactions at the Houston store. If required, round your answer to three decimal places. ____ (b) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the porportion of returns at the Houston store. If required, round your answer to three decimal places. ____ to _____
(c) Is the proportion of returns at the Houston store significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole? Provide statistical support for your answer. We ____ the null hypothesis. We ____ the return rate for the Houston store is different than the U.S. national return rate.
In January, a Houston department store sampled 80 items sold and found 10 of them were returned. Based on sample, estimate proportion of items returned for population of sales transactions at the Houston store.
(a) The point estimate of the proportion of items returned at the Houston store is calculated by dividing the number of returned items (10) by the total sample size (80). Therefore, the point estimate is 10/80 = 0.125, or 12.5%.
(b) To construct a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of returns at the Houston store, we can use the formula: point estimate ± (critical value * standard error).
The critical value can be obtained from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level. For a 95% confidence level, the critical value is approximately 1.96. The standard error is calculated as the square root of [(point estimate * (1 - point estimate)) / sample size]. Plugging in the values, we can calculate the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval.
(c) To determine if the proportion of returns at the Houston store is significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole, we can conduct a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis would state that the return rate for the Houston store is the same as the U.S. national return rate (6%), while the alternative hypothesis would state that they are different. We can perform a statistical test, such as a z-test, to calculate the test statistic and compare it to the critical value to determine if we can reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
To learn more about sales transactions click here : brainly.com/question/30656243
#SPJ11
2x³-4x-8 (x²-x)(x²+4) S This topic was locked May 31 at 11:59pm. dx
The given expression is (2x³-4x-8)/(x²-x)(x²+4) and we are asked to find the derivative of this expression with respect to x.
To find the derivative of the given expression, we can use the quotient rule. The quotient rule states that for a function of the form f(x)/g(x), where f(x) and g(x) are both functions of x, the derivative can be found using the formula (f'(x)g(x) - g'(x)f(x))/[g(x)]².
Applying the quotient rule to the given expression, we differentiate the numerator and denominator separately. The derivative of 2x³-4x-8 is 6x²-4, and the derivative of (x²-x)(x²+4) is (2x-1)(x²+4) + (x²-x)(2x), which simplifies to 4x³-2x²+4.
Combining these results using the quotient rule formula, we get the derivative of the given expression as (6x²-4)(x²-x)(x²+4) - (2x-1)(x²+4)(2x³-4x-8)/[(x²-x)(x²+4)]².
To know more about quotient rule here: brainly.com/question/30278964 #SPJ11.
(2pts) An owner of a convenience store wants to estimate the 95% confidence interval for the average price that convenience stores charge for a popular energy drink. She wants the margin of error for her confidence interval to be, at most, \$0.09. What is the minimum number of convienence stores that she should include in her sample if she uses the standard deviation estimate of $0.32, as reported in the popular press? (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places and " z " value to 3 decimal places. Round up your answer to the nearest whole number.)
With a desired maximum margin of error of $0.09 and an estimated standard deviation of $0.32, rounding up to the nearest whole number, the minimum required sample size is 25.
The owner wants the margin of error to be at most $0.09. Using the standard deviation estimate of $0.32 and a 95% confidence level, the corresponding z-value is approximately 1.96.
To calculate the minimum sample size (n), we can use the formula:
n = [(z * σ) / E]^2
Substituting the values:
n = [(1.96 * 0.32) / 0.09]^2 ≈ 24.835
Rounding up to the nearest whole number, the owner should include a minimum of 25 convenience stores in her sample to estimate the 95% confidence interval for the average price of the energy drink.
To know more about sample size, click here: brainly.com/question/30100088
#SPJ11
A control chart is to be established on a process producing refrigerators. The inspection unit is one refrigerator, and a common chart for nonconformities is to be used. As preliminary data, 16 non- conformities were counted in inspecting 30 refrigerators. Samples on the control limits are regarded in-control. (a) Find two-sigma control limits (b) Find the α error for the control chart with two-sigma control limits (c) Find the β error for the chart with two-sigma control limits if the average number of defects is actually two (i.e., c=2 ) (d) Find the ARL if c=2.01
The standard deviation is calculated using the formula sqrt(p(1-p)/n), where p is the proportion of non-conformities (16/30) and n is the number of refrigerators inspected (30).
Plugging in the values, we get sqrt((16/30)(14/30)/30) = 0.0971. The two-sigma control limits are then calculated by multiplying the standard deviation by 2 and adding/subtracting the result from the average number of non-conformities: Upper Control Limit = 0.5333 + (2 * 0.0971) = 0.7275, Lower Control Limit = 0.5333 - (2 * 0.0971) = 0.3391.
(b) The α error for the control chart with two-sigma control limits represents the probability of a false alarm, i.e., detecting an out-of-control condition when the process is actually in control. The α error is typically set as the significance level, which determines the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis (in this case, the process being in control) when it is true. In this case, since we are using two-sigma control limits, the α error would correspond to the area under the normal distribution curve outside the control limits, which is approximately 0.046 or 4.6%.
(c) The β error for the chart with two-sigma control limits represents the probability of not detecting an out-of-control condition when the process is actually out of control. To calculate the β error, we need to know the average number of defects (c = 2) and the parameters of the distribution. However, the parameters are not provided in the given information, so it is not possible to calculate the β error without further details.(d) The ARL (Average Run Length) represents the average number of samples that need to be taken before an out-of-control condition is detected. It is calculated as 1/α, where α is the probability of a false alarm. In this case, the ARL would be approximately 1/0.046, which is approximately 21.74 samples.Note: Without specific information about the distribution of defects and the parameters, some calculations (such as β error) cannot be determined in this scenario.
To learn more about standard deviation click here : brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Sample data and hypotheses for a chi-square goodness-of-fit test are given. Fill in the table to compute the expected counts.
Hypotheses:
H0:pA=0.3,pB=0.3,pC=0.4
Ha: Some pi is not as given
Sample Data:
A.
B.
C.
Total
28
50
45
123
Enter the expected counts in the following table. Enter the exact answers.
Answer:
The expected counts for each category are A | 28 | 36.9 B | 50 | 36.9 C | 45 | 49.2 Total | 123 | 123
To compute the expected counts for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, we need to calculate the expected count for each category based on the null hypothesis. The expected count for each category is given by:
Expected count = Total count * Probability
Given the null hypothesis:
H0: pA = 0.3, pB = 0.3, pC = 0.4
And the sample data:
A: 28
B: 50
C: 45
Total: 123
We can calculate the expected counts as follows:
Expected count for A = Total * pA = 123 * 0.3 = 36.9
Expected count for B = Total * pB = 123 * 0.3 = 36.9
Expected count for C = Total * pC = 123 * 0.4 = 49.2
Total = 123
Now, let's fill in the table with the expected counts:
Category | Observed Count | Expected Count
A | 28 | 36.9
B | 50 | 36.9
C | 45 | 49.2
Total | 123 | 123
The expected counts for each category are filled in the "Expected Count" column of the table.
Learn more about category from below link
https://brainly.com/question/27553972
#SPJ11
Answer:
The expected counts for each category are A | 28 | 36.9 B | 50 | 36.9 C | 45 | 49.2 Total | 123 | 123
To compute the expected counts for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, we need to calculate the expected count for each category based on the null hypothesis. The expected count for each category is given by:
Expected count = Total count * Probability
Given the null hypothesis:
H0: pA = 0.3, pB = 0.3, pC = 0.4
And the sample data:
A: 28
B: 50
C: 45
Total: 123
We can calculate the expected counts as follows:
Expected count for A = Total * pA = 123 * 0.3 = 36.9
Expected count for B = Total * pB = 123 * 0.3 = 36.9
Expected count for C = Total * pC = 123 * 0.4 = 49.2
Total = 123
Now, let's fill in the table with the expected counts:
Category | Observed Count | Expected Count
A | 28 | 36.9
B | 50 | 36.9
C | 45 | 49.2
Total | 123 | 123
The expected counts for each category are filled in the "Expected Count" column of the table.
Learn more about category from below link
brainly.com/question/27553972
#SPJ11
Given P(A) = 0.10, P(B) = 0.70, P(C) = 0.38 and that events A, B, and C are independent, what is P(A, B, and C).
Answer in decimal form. Round to 3 decimal places as needed.
Your Answer:
Given P(E or F) = 0.87, P(E) = 0.13, and P(E and F) = 0.08, what is P(F)?
Given P(E or F) = 0.86, P(F) = 0.26, and P(E and F) = 0.18, what is P(E)?
Given P(E) = 0.28, P(F) = 0.22, and P(E and F) = 0.03, what is P(E or F)?
Given P(E) = 0.26, what is P(E')?
Based on a study from the Chronicles of Flippin'' Awesomeness, the probability that Napoleon and Pedro make it to their first period class on time is 0.39. The probability that they make it to their first period class on time, given that they catch the bus is 0.57. The probability that Napoleon and Pedro catch the bus and make it to their first period class on time is 0.23. What is the probability that Napoleon and Pedro catch the bus?
Given P(A) = 0.10, P(B) = 0.70, P(C) = 0.38 and that events A, B, and C are independent. Probability of A, B, and C is given by:P(A ∩ B ∩ C) = P(A) × P(B) × P(C)⇒ P(A ∩ B ∩ C) = 0.10 × 0.70 × 0.38= 0.0266≈0.027
Given the probabilities of events A, B, and C, we can find the probability of their intersection if they are independent.
In probability theory, the intersection of two or more events is the event containing elements that belong to all of the events.
The formula to find the probability of the intersection of two independent events is:
P(A ∩ B) = P(A) × P(B)
For three independent events, the formula is:
P(A ∩ B ∩ C) = P(A) × P(B) × P(C)
Using the given probabilities, we can find the probability of A, B, and C:
P(A) = 0.10P(B) = 0.70P(C) = 0.38
Now, using the formula above:
P(A ∩ B ∩ C) = P(A) × P(B) × P(C)= 0.10 × 0.70 × 0.38= 0.0266≈0.027
Therefore, the probability of A, B, and C is 0.027.Conclusion:The probability of A, B, and C given that events A, B, and C are independent is 0.027.
To know more about probability visit:
brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
The average annual membership fee at a random sample of 200 sports clubs in the south-west region of a country is RM 250 with a standard deviation of RM 45 . The average annual membership fee of a random sample of 150 sports clubs in the northeast region is RM 220 with a standard deviation of RM 55. Test the null hypothesis that average sports club membership fees are the same in both regions at 10% level of significance.
The average annual membership fee at a random sample of 200 sports clubs in the south-west region of a country is RM 250 with a standard deviation of RM 45 . The average annual membership fee of a random sample of 150 sports clubs in the northeast region is RM 220 with a standard deviation of RM 55.
There is a difference in the average sports club membership fees between the southwest and northeast regions at the 10% level of significance.
To test the null hypothesis that the average sports club membership fees are the same in both regions, we can use a two-sample t-test.
1: The null and alternative hypotheses:
Null hypothesis (H₀): The average sports club membership fees are the same in both regions.
Alternative hypothesis (H₁): The average sports club membership fees are different in the two regions.
2: Set the significance level:
The significance level (α) is given as 10% or 0.1.
3: Compute the test statistic:
We can use the two-sample t-test formula to calculate the test statistic:
t = (x₁ - x₂) / √((s₁² / n₁) + (s₂² / n₂))
where:
x₁ = sample mean of the south-west region = RM 250
x₂ = sample mean of the northeast region = RM 220
s₁ = standard deviation of the south-west region = RM 45
s₂ = standard deviation of the northeast region = RM 55
n₁ = sample size of the south-west region = 200
n₂ = sample size of the northeast region = 150
The test statistic value:
t = (250 - 220) / √((45² / 200) + (55² / 150))
= 30 / √(10.125 + 20.167)
= 30 / √(30.292)
≈ 30 / 5.503
≈ 5.450
4: Determine the critical value:
Since our alternative hypothesis is that the average fees are different, we will perform a two-tailed test. With a 90% confidence level, the critical value can be found by looking up the t-distribution table or using statistical software. For a two-tailed test and 90% confidence, the critical value is approximately ±1.645.
5: Compare the test statistic with the critical value:
Our test statistic t is approximately 5.450, which is greater than the critical value of ±1.645.
Since the test statistic is in the critical region (beyond the critical value), we reject the null hypothesis. This means there is evidence to support the claim that the average sports club membership fees are different in the two regions.
Therefore, we conclude that there is a significant difference in the average sports club membership fees between the southwest and northeast regions at the 10% level of significance.
To know more about average here
https://brainly.com/question/24057012
#SPJ4
Total blood volume (in ml) per body weight (in kg) is important in medical research. For healthy adults, the red blood cell volume mean is about 28 ml/kg.1 Red blood cell volume that is too low or too high can indicate a medical problem. Suppose that Roger has had seven blood tests, and the red blood cell volumes were as follows. 31 24 43 37 29 38 28 Let x be a random variable that represents Roger's red blood cell volume. Assume that x has a normal distribution and a 4.75. Do the data indicate that Roger's red blood cell volume is different (either way) from - 28 ml/kg?
Based on the hypothesis testing evidence concludes that Roger's red blood cell volume is significantly different from 28 ml/kg.
To determine if Roger's red blood cell volume is different from the mean value of 28 ml/kg, we can perform a hypothesis test using the given data.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): Roger's red blood cell volume is not different from 28 ml/kg.
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): Roger's red blood cell volume is different from 28 ml/kg.
We can use a t-test to compare the sample mean of Roger's red blood cell volumes with the hypothesized mean of 28 ml/kg.
Using the given data: 31, 24, 43, 37, 29, 38, 28
Calculate the sample mean (X) and sample standard deviation (s) of the data.
X = (31 + 24 + 43 + 37 + 29 + 38 + 28) / 7 = 32.71
s = √[(31-32.71)² + (24-32.71)² + (43-32.71)² + (37-32.71)² + (29-32.71)² + (38-32.71)² + (28-32.71)²] / (7-1) ≈ 6.96
Calculate the t-value using the formula:
t = (X - μ) / (s / √n)
where μ is the hypothesized mean (28 ml/kg), n is the sample size (7).
t = (32.71 - 28) / (6.96 / √7) ≈ 0.88
Determine the critical t-value for a given significance level (α) and degrees of freedom (df = n - 1). Let's assume a significance level of 0.05 and df = 6 (since n = 7).
Using a t-table or statistical software, the critical t-value for a two-tailed test is approximately ±2.447.
Compare the calculated t-value with the critical t-value.
|t| < critical t-value implies that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In this case, |0.88| < 2.447, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Learn more about hypothesis tests at
https://brainly.com/question/17099835
#SPJ4
Suppose that f(x,y)={ 15x 2
y
0
;
;
0
otherwise
a) Compute E(X∣y),Var(X) and Var(Y). b) Hence, deduce the value of rho=Corr(X,Y).
That further simplification may be possible depending on the specific values of x and y.
To compute E(X|y), Var(X), Var(Y), and Corr(X,Y), we need to calculate the marginal distributions and conditional expectations.
Given the joint probability distribution:
f(x,y) =
15x^2 * y, if x > 0 and y > 0
0, otherwise
Let's calculate the marginal distribution of X and Y first:
Marginal distribution of X:
[tex]fX(x) = ∫f(x,y)dy = ∫(15x^2 * y)dy (from y = 0 to infinity) = 15x^2 * ∫y dy = 15x^2 * [y^2/2] (evaluating the integral) = 7.5x^2 * y^2[/tex]
Marginal distribution of Y:
[tex]fY(y) = ∫f(x,y)dx = ∫(15x^2 * y)dx (from x = 0 to infinity) = 15y * ∫x^2 dx = 15y * [x^3/3] (evaluating the integral) = 5y * x^3\\[/tex]
Now, let's calculate the conditional expectation E(X|y):
[tex]E(X|y) = ∫x * f(x|y) dx = ∫x * (f(x,y)/fY(y)) dx (using Bayes' rule) = ∫x * ((15x^2 * y) / (5y * x^3)) dx = 3/y * ∫dx = 3/y * x (integrating with respect to x) = 3/y * x^2/2 (evaluating the integral) = 1.5/y * x^2[/tex]
[tex]To compute Var(X), we need to calculate E(X^2) first:E(X^2) = ∫x^2 * fX(x) dx = ∫x^2 * (7.5x^2 * y^2) dx = 7.5y^2 * ∫x^4 dx = 7.5y^2 * [x^5/5] (evaluating the integral) = 1.5y^2 * x^5\\[/tex]
Now, we can calculate Var(X):
[tex]Var(X) = E(X^2) - (E(X))^2 = 1.5y^2 * x^5 - (1.5/y * x^2)^2 = 1.5y^2 * x^5 - 2.25/y^2 * x^4To compute Var(Y), we need to calculate E(Y^2) first:E(Y^2) = ∫y^2 * fY(y) dy = ∫y^2 * (5y * x^3) dy = 5x^3 * ∫y^3 dy = 5x^3 * [y^4/4] (evaluating the integral) = 1.25x^3 * y^4[/tex]
Now, we can calculate Var(Y):
[tex]Var(Y) = E(Y^2) - (E(Y))^2 = 1.25x^3 * y^4 - (5x^3 * y)^2 = 1.25x^3 * y^4 - 25x^6 * y^2\\[/tex]
Finally, let's deduce the value of rho = Cor
r(X,Y):
[tex]Corr(X,Y) = Cov(X,Y) / sqrt(Var(X) * Var(Y))Cov(X,Y) = E(X * Y) - E(X) * E(Y)E(X * Y) = ∫∫x * y * f(x,y) dx dy = ∫∫x * y * (15x^2 * y) dx dy = 15 * ∫∫x^3 * y^2 dx dy = 15 * ∫(1.5/y * x^2) * y^2 dx dy (using E(X|y) = 1.5/y * x^2) = 22.5 * ∫x^2 dx dy = 22.5 * [x^3/3] (evaluating the integral) = 7.5x^3[/tex]
[tex]E(X) = ∫x * fX(x) dx = ∫x * (7.5x^2 * y^2) dx = 7.5y^2 * ∫x^3 dx = 7.5y^2 * [x^4/4] (evaluating the integral) = 1.875y^2 * x^4E(Y) = ∫y * fY(y) dy = ∫y * (5x^3 * y) dy = 5x^3 * ∫y^2 dy = 5x^3 * [y^3/3] (evaluating the integral) = 1.667x^3 * y^3Cov(X,Y) = E(X * Y) - E(X) * E(Y) = 7.5x^3 - (1.875y^2 * x^4) * (1.667x^3 * y^3) = 7.5x^3 - 3.125x^7 * y^5[/tex]
Now, we can calculate rho:
[tex]rho = Corr(X,Y) = Cov(X,Y) / sqrt(Var(X) * Var(Y)) = (7.5x^3 - 3.125x^7 * y^5) / sqrt((1.5y^2 * x^5 - 2.25/y^2 * x^4) * (1.25x^3 * y^4 - 25x^6 * y^2))\\[/tex]
Please note that further simplification may be possible depending on the specific values of x and y.
To know more about value click-
http://brainly.com/question/843074
#SPJ11
Click on the link to open the interactive figure. Example 1: f(x)=x²-1 4 Slowly slide the blue slider to the left and watch the x and y values adjust. a) What is the y-value when x = 3? b) What is the y-value when x = 5? c) What is the y-value when x = 4.5? d) What is the y-value when x = 3.75? e) As x approaches 4, what y-value does the function approach? E Change the function to the third example (bottom right). 1-cos x Example 3: f(x) = - X Slowly slide the blue slider to the left and watch the x and y values adjust. i) As x approaches 0, what y-value does the function approach?
The values of y when x = 3, 5, 4.5 and 3.75 are 8, 24, 11.25 and 6.5625 respectively.
The function in Example 3 is f(x) = - x. When x approaches 0, the y-value that the function approaches is 0.
The values of y for different x values were obtained for the function f(x) = x² - 1 in Example 1.
The values of y when x = 3, 5, 4.5 and 3.75 are 8, 24, 11.25 and 6.5625 respectively. For Example 3, the function was f(x) = - x.
When x approaches 0, the y-value that the function approaches is 0. This was found by slowly sliding the blue slider to the left and watching the x and y values adjust.
The interactive figure helped in visualizing the changes in the function as the slider was moved.
The values of y for different x values provide insight into the behavior of the function for different inputs.
To know more about function visit:
brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
a student takes an examination consisting of 20 true-false questions. the student knows the answer to n of the questions, which are answered correctly, and guesses the answers to the rest. the conditional probability that the student knows the answer to a question, given that the student answered it correctly, is 0.824. calculate n
The student knows the answer to approximately 5 questions out of the 20.
Let's denote the event that the student knows the answer to a question as K and the event that the student answers the question correctly as C. We are given the following information:
P(K) = n/20 (probability that the student knows the answer)
P(C|K) = 1 (probability of answering correctly given that the student knows the answer)
P(K|C) = 0.824 (conditional probability that the student knows the answer given that the student answered correctly)
We can use Bayes' theorem to find the value of n:
P(K|C) = P(C|K) * P(K) / P(C)
P(C) = P(C|K) * P(K) + P(C|not K) * P(not K)
= 1 * (n/20) + (1/2) * ((20-n)/20)
= n/20 + (20-n)/40
= (2n + 20 - n) / 40
= (n + 20) / 40
Now, substituting the values into Bayes' theorem:
0.824 = 1 * (n/20) / ((n + 20) / 40)
0.824 = (2n / 20) * (40 / (n + 20))
0.824 = 4n / (n + 20)
Cross-multiplying:
0.824 * (n + 20) = 4n
0.824n + 16.48 = 4n
3.176n = 16.48
n = 16.48 / 3.176
n ≈ 5.18
Therefore, the student knows the answer to approximately 5 questions out of the 20.
Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
We wish to estimate what percent of adult residents in a certain county are parents. Out of 600 adult residents sampled, 78 had kids. Based on this, construct a 99% confidence interval for the proportion, p, of adult residents who are parents in this county. Give your answers as decimals, to three places.
Express the answer in tri-inequality form.
0.779 < p < 0.781
Here, we have,
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of π, and a confidence level of 1-α, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.
π ± z√π(1-π)/n
In which
z is the z-score that has a p-value of 1-α/2.
Out of 600 adult residents sampled, 78 had kids.
Based on this, construct a 99%.
This means that : n = 600, π=78/100 = 0.78
99% confidence level
So α=0.01, z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of 0.995, so z = 2.575.
The lower limit of this interval is:
π - z√π(1-π)/n = 0.779
The upper limit of this interval is:
π + z√π(1-π)/n = 0.781
Express your answer in tri-inequality form.
0.779 < p < 0.781
To learn more about the confidence interval, visit:
brainly.com/question/17097944
#SPJ4
Find the minimum and maximum values of the function f(x, y, z) = 5x + 2y + 2z subject to the constraint x² + 2y² + 5z² = 1. (Use decimal notation. Round your answers to one decimal place.) minimum:
The minimum and maximum values of the function f(x, y, z) subject to the given constraint are -4.7 and 4.7, respectively.
The given function is f(x, y, z) = 5x + 2y + 2z subject to the constraint x² + 2y² + 5z² = 1.
So, the Lagrange function for the function f(x, y, z) is given by
L(x, y, z, λ) = f(x, y, z) - λg(x, y, z),
where g(x, y, z) = x² + 2y² + 5z² - 1.
Substitute the values in the Lagrange function, we get
L(x, y, z, λ) = (5x + 2y + 2z) - λ(x² + 2y² + 5z² - 1)
Now, differentiate the function L(x, y, z, λ) w.r.t x, y, z, and λ, separately and equate them to zero.
∂L/∂x = 5 - 2λx = 0 ...(1)
∂L/∂y = 2 - 4λy = 0 ...(2)
∂L/∂z = 2 - 10λz = 0 ...(3)
∂L/∂λ = x² + 2y² + 5z² - 1 = 0 ...(4)
Solve the above equations to find x, y, z, and λ.
From equation (1),
5 - 2λx = 0=> x = 5/2λ
From equation (2),
2 - 4λy = 0=> y = 1/2λ
From equation (3),
2 - 10λz = 0=> z = 1/5λ
From equation (4),
x² + 2y² + 5z² - 1 = 0=> (5/2λ)² + 2(1/2λ)² + 5(1/5λ)² - 1 = 0=> (25/4λ²) + (2/4λ²) + (1/5λ²) - 1 = 0=> λ² = 25/4 + 20 + 4/5=> λ² = 156.25/20=> λ² = 7.8125=> λ = ±2.793
The values of λ are λ = 2.793, and λ = -2.793.
Find the values of x, y, and z, for each value of λ.
For λ = 2.793, x = 5/2
λ = 5/(2 × 2.793) ≈ 0.895
y = 1/2
λ = 1/(2 × 2.793) ≈ 0.179
z = 1/5
λ = 1/(5 × 2.793) ≈ 0.071
The value of the function f(x, y, z) for λ = 2.793 is
f(x, y, z) = 5x + 2y + 2z≈ 5 × 0.895 + 2 × 0.179 + 2 × 0.071 ≈ 4.747
Therefore, the minimum and maximum values of the function f(x, y, z) subject to the given constraint are -4.7 and 4.7, respectively.
Learn more about Lagrange function visit:
brainly.com/question/30760770
#SPJ11
When studying radioactive material, a nuclear engineer found that over 365 days, 1,000,000 radioactive atoms decayed to 978,271 radioactive atoms, so 21,729 atoms decayed during 365 days.
a. Find the mean number of radioactive atoms that decayed in a day.
b. Find the probability that on a given day, 52 radioactive atoms decayed.
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
a. The mean number of radioactive atoms that decayed in a day is approximately 59.571.
b. The probability that on a given day, 52 radioactive atoms decayed is approximately 0.239.
a. To find the mean number of radioactive atoms that decayed in a day, we divide the total number of atoms decayed (21,729) by the number of days (365). This gives us an average of approximately 59.571 atoms decaying per day.
b. To calculate the probability that on a given day, 52 radioactive atoms decayed, we can use the concept of Poisson distribution. The Poisson distribution is commonly used to model the number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time. In this case, we have the mean number of atoms decaying per day, which we calculated in part a as approximately 59.571.
Using the Poisson distribution formula, we can calculate the probability:
P(X = 52) = [tex](e^{-\lambda} * \lambda^x)[/tex]/ x!
Where λ is the mean number of decays per day and x is the number of decays we want to find the probability for.
Substituting the values, we have:
P(X = 52) = [tex](e^{-59.571} * 59.571^{52})[/tex] / 52!
Using a scientific calculator or software, we can compute this value, which is approximately 0.239.
Therefore, the probability that on a given day, 52 radioactive atoms decayed is approximately 0.239, or 23.9% (rounded to three decimal places).
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11
Using the data presented in the Table below:
a) Construct a correlation matrix between x1, x2, ×3, and y? Is
there any evidence that multicollinearity exists?
b) Determine the multiple regression line with x1, x2 and x3 as
explanatory variables.
c) Comment on F-test statistic and t-test statistics.
x1 x2 x3 Y
0.8 2.8 2.5 11.0
3.9 2.6 5.7 10.8
1.8 2.4 7.8 10.6
5.1 2.3 7.1 10.3
4.9 2.5 5.9 10.3
8.4 2.1 8.6 10.3
12.9 2.3 9.2 10.0
6.0 2.0 1.2 9.4
14.6 2.2 3.7 8.7
9.3 1.1 5.5 8.7
Answer:
1.8 2.4 7.8 10.6
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope you♡ love it
Suppose that a certain college class contains 65 students. Of these, 39 are freshmen, 28 are chemistry majors, and 10 are neither. A student is selected at random from the class. (a) What is the probability that the student is both a freshman and a chemistry major? (b) Given that the student selected is a freshman, what is the probability that he is also a chemistry major?
According to given information, the probabilities are as follows.
For (a) [tex]P(F\ \text{and}\ C) = 0[/tex]
For (b) [tex]P(C | F) = 0[/tex]
a) We have that there are 65 students, of whom 39 are freshmen and 28 are chemistry majors and there are 10 who are neither.
Let's call F to the event that the student is a freshman, and C to the event that the student is a chemistry major.
Then, the probability of being a freshman and chemistry major is:
P(F and C) = 0, since there are only 28 chemistry majors, and they are not freshmen.
b) The probability of a student being a chemistry major given that he is a freshman is:
[tex]P(C | F) = P(C \ \text{and}\ F) / P(F)[/tex]
Now we need to calculate P(C and F), which is the probability that the student is both a freshman and a chemistry major. As we have seen in part (a), this probability is 0.
So: [tex]P(C | F) = P(C\ \text{and}\ F) / P(F) \\= 0 / 39 \\= 0[/tex]
The probability of a freshman student being a chemistry major is 0.
Answer: For (a) [tex]P(F\ \text{and}\ C) = 0[/tex]
For (b) [tex]P(C | F) = 0[/tex]
To know more about probability, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
the lengths of the sides of a different triangle are given below. Which is a right triangle?
a. 6,13,14
b. 5,12,13
c. 9,7,11
d.9,7,10
e. 5,12,12
\( \int \frac{x^{2}}{\sqrt{9-x^{2}}} d x \)
The given integral is given by:[tex]\[\int \frac{x^{2}}{\sqrt{9-x^{2}}} d x\][/tex]. Substituting x = 3 sin θ, we have: dx = 3 cos θ dθ∴
[tex]\[\int \frac{x^{2}}{\sqrt{9-x^{2}}} d x=\int \frac{9\sin^{2}θ}{\sqrt{9-9\sin^{2}θ}}\times 3cosθdθ\][/tex]
On solving, we get
[tex]\[I = -9\int \cos^{2}θdθ\][/tex]
Using the identity,[tex]\[\cos^{2}\theta=\frac{\cos2\theta+1}{2}\][/tex]
We have
[tex]\[I=-\frac{9}{2}\int(\cos 2\theta+1)d\theta\]\[I=-\frac{9}{2}\times \left[ \frac{1}{2} \sin 2 \theta + \theta\right] + c\][/tex]
Substituting back for x, we have
[tex]\[I=-\frac{9}{2}\times \left[ \frac{1}{2} \sin 2 \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{3}\right) + \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{3}\right)\right] + c\]\[=\underline{\mathbf{\frac{-9x\sqrt{9-x^{2}}}{2}+9\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{3}\right)+c}}\][/tex]
The conclusion is the antiderivative of [tex]\[\frac{x^{2}}{\sqrt{9-x^{2}}}\]is equal to \[\frac{-9x\sqrt{9-x^{2}}}{2}+9\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{3}\right)+c\].[/tex]
To know more about antiderivative visit:
brainly.com/question/31396969
#SPJ11
Suppose X is a binomial random variable such that n = 15 and p = 0.33, then, P(X= 8) is O 0.6781 O 0.8862 O 0.0549 O 0.5000 Câu hỏi 9 P(X is at least 7, (x> 7) is O 0.916 O 0.157 O 0.195 O 0.083 3
The probability of obtaining exactly 8 successes in a binomial distribution with n = 15 trials and p = 0.33 is 0.157. This means that the probability of getting exactly 8 successes out of 15 trials is approximately 0.157.
To calculate this probability, we can use the binomial probability formula:
[tex]\[ P(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} \cdot p^k \cdot (1-p)^{n-k} \][/tex]
Where [tex]\( \binom{n}{k} \)[/tex] represents the number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials, [tex]\( p^k \)[/tex] is the probability of success raised to the power of k, and [tex]\( (1-p)^{n-k} \)[/tex] is the probability of failure raised to the power of (n-k).
Plugging in the values, we have:
[tex]\[ P(X = 8) = \binom{15}{8} \cdot 0.33^8 \cdot (1-0.33)^{15-8} \approx 0.157 \][/tex]
Therefore, the probability of obtaining exactly 8 successes is approximately 0.157.
Now, let's calculate the probability of X being at least 7 (X > 7). This can be found by summing the probabilities of X being 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15.
P(X > 7) = P(X = 8) + P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11) + P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) + P(X = 14) + P(X = 15)
To calculate each individual probability, we use the same binomial probability formula. After calculating each term and summing them up, we find that P(X > 7) is approximately 0.916.
Therefore, the probability of X being at least 7 is approximately 0.916.
To learn more about probability refer:
https://brainly.com/question/25839839
#SPJ11
Find the quadratic function that is the best fit for f(x) defined by the table below. X 0 2 4 6 8 10 f(x) 0 398 1601 3605 6405 9998 The quadratic function is y=x² + +x+O. ·O· (Type an integer or decimal rounded to two decimal places as needed.)
To find the quadratic function that best fits the given table of values, we need to determine the coefficients of the quadratic equation y = ax² + bx + c.
By substituting the values from the table into the equation, we can form a system of equations and solve for the unknown coefficients.
The given table provides the values of f(x) for six different x-values. We want to find a quadratic function that best represents these data points. We start by substituting the x and f(x) values into the general quadratic equation:
0 = a(0)² + b(0) + c
398 = a(2)² + b(2) + c
1601 = a(4)² + b(4) + c
3605 = a(6)² + b(6) + c
6405 = a(8)² + b(8) + c
9998 = a(10)² + b(10) + c
Simplifying these equations, we obtain a system of equations:
0 = c
398 = 4a + 2b + c
1601 = 16a + 4b + c
3605 = 36a + 6b + c
6405 = 64a + 8b + c
9998 = 100a + 10b + c
We can solve this system of equations to find the values of a, b, and c. Once we have these coefficients, we can write the quadratic function that best fits the given data.
To learn more about equations click here:
brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ11
