Construct a 90% confidence interval for the following population
proportion: In a survey of 600 Americans, 391 say they made a New
Years Resolution.

The vector u that maps to b under the transformation T is approximately u = [3.93, -9.29].

To find a vector u such that the transformation T maps u to the vector b, we need to solve the equation T(u) = b, where T is defined as T(u) = Au, and A is the given matrix.

Given matrix A:

A = [[2, 2], [8, -3]]

Vector b:

b = [-10, -25]

We want to find a vector u such that T(u) = Au = b.

Step 1: Write the equation T(u) = b in matrix form:

Au = b

Step 2: Solve the matrix equation:

To solve this equation, we can use matrix inversion. If A is invertible, we can find the vector u by multiplying both sides of the equation by the inverse of A.

First, we need to find the inverse of matrix A:

A^(-1) = [[-3/14, -1/14], [8/14, 2/14]] = [[-3/14, -1/14], [4/7, 1/7]]

Step 3: Multiply both sides of the equation by A^(-1):

A^(-1)Au = A^(-1)b

Iu = A^(-1)b

u = A^(-1)b

Step 4: Calculate the product A^(-1)b:

A^(-1)b = [[-3/14, -1/14], [4/7, 1/7]] [-10, -25]

= [-3/14 * -10 + -1/14 * -25, 4/7 * -10 + 1/7 * -25]

= [30/14 + 25/14, -40/7 - 25/7]

= [55/14, -65/7]

≈ [3.93, -9.29]

To learn more about  vector click here:

brainly.com/question/24256726

#SPJ11

In statistics, the normal model is N (79,4). It tells us that the mean statisticsscore is 79 with a standard deviation of 4. Professor is using a 10-point scale (100-90 A, 80-89 B, 70-79 C, 60-69 D, below 60 F). To find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles, we need to convert each percentile to a z-score and use the z-score formula, which is z = (x - µ) / σ.

The lower value of the new range is then found by converting each z-score back to a value using the formula x = µ + zσ, where µ is the population mean and σ is the population standard deviation. Using these formulas, we can find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles:For the 90th percentile, the z-score is 1.28.

Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (1.28)(4)= 84.12 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 80th percentile, the z-score is 0.84. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.84)(4)= 82.36 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 70th percentile, the z-score is 0.52. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.52)(4)= 81.08 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 60th percentile, the z-score is 0.25. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.25)(4)= 79.25 (rounded to two decimal places)Therefore, the new range is:A: 84.12-100B: 82.36-84.11C: 81.08-82.35D: 79.25-81.07F: Below 79.25  

To find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles, we need to convert each percentile to a z-score and use the z-score formula, which is z = (x - µ) / σ. The lower value of the new range is then found by converting each z-score back to a value using the formula x = µ + zσ, where µ is the population mean and σ is the population standard deviation.

To know more about statistics,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31577270

#SPJ11

The set G, defined as the set of points belonging to En for at least m values of n, is measurable. Furthermore, it satisfies the inequality mμ(G) ≤ Σ-1μ(En), where μ represents the measure of the sets En.

To show that G is measurable, we can express G as the countable union of sets where each set corresponds to the points belonging to En for exactly m values of n. Since the En sets are measurable, their complements, En', are also measurable. Therefore, the union of complements of En', denoted as G', is measurable. Since G = G'^C, the complement of G', G is also measurable.

Now, consider the indicator function -1 X₂(*)dµ(x) which equals 1 if x ∈ En for at least m values of n, and 0 otherwise. By definition, this indicator function represents G.

Using the indicator function, we can write mμ(G) as the integral of -1 X₂(*)dµ(x) over the entire space. By linearity of integration, this integral is equal to the sum of the integrals of the indicator function over En.

Therefore, mμ(G) = Σ-1μ(En), which shows the desired inequality.

In conclusion, the set G is measurable, and it satisfies the inequality mμ(G) ≤ Σ-1μ(En) where μ represents the measure of the sets En.

Learn more about Countable union here: brainly.com/question/30638024

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option A: No, there is a good chance that ten randomly selected adult male passengers will exceed the elevator capacity.

This elevator does not appear safe because there is a 0.3318 probability that it is overloaded when ten randomly selected adult male passengers with a mean weight greater than 171 pounds are in it.

Given data: An elevator has a placard stating that the maximum capacity is 1710lb−10 passengers. If the elevator is loaded with ten adult male passengers, the maximum weight can be 10 * 171 = 1710 pounds. The weights of males are normally distributed with a mean of 175lb and a standard deviation of 29lb.

To find: Find the probability that the elevator is overloaded because they have a mean weight greater than 171lb.s this elevator appear safe?

Solution: Let X be the weight of a randomly selected male passenger from the elevator.Then X ~ N (175, 29). For a sample size of 10 passengers, the mean weight of passengers, We know that the mean of the sampling distribution of sample mean = population means \mu x = 175.

The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean

[tex]= \sigma x = σ / \sqrt{n} = 29 / \sqrt{10} = 9.17[/tex]

Then z-score for the sample mean can be calculated as

[tex]z = (\bar x - \mu x) / \sigma x= (171 - 175) / 9.17[/tex]

= -0.4367P(z > -0.4367)

= 1 - P(z < -0.4367)

= 1 - 0.3318

= 0.6682

The probability that the elevator is overloaded because they have a mean weight greater than 171lb is 0.3318.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A: No, there is a good chance that ten randomly selected adult male passengers will exceed the elevator capacity. This elevator does not appear safe because there is a 0.3318 probability that it is overloaded when ten randomly selected adult male passengers with a mean weight greater than 171 pounds are in it.

To know more about standard deviation, visit:

brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

The probability that corresponds to P(Z = -2.64) is 0.0040.

Given that we are to find the indicated probability using the standard normal distribution,

we have:P(Z = -2.64)We use the standard normal distribution table to find the corresponding area/probability for the given z-score z = -2.64.

From the table; the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z = -2.64 is 0.0040. (rounded to four decimal places as required)
Therefore, the main answer is:P(Z = -2.64) = 0.0040

The standard normal distribution is a normal distribution that has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. It is also referred to as the z-distribution because of its standard score that is the z-score.

A z-score or standard score shows how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean of its population. It is calculated by subtracting the mean from the data point and then dividing the result by the standard deviation.

The standard normal distribution table, also known as the z-table, is a table that shows the area under the standard normal distribution curve between the mean and a specific z-score.

It is used to find the probability of a random variable from a standard normal distribution falling between two points.

From the question, we have P(Z = -2.64) and we are required to find the probability. Using the standard normal distribution table, we find that the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z = -2.64 is 0.0040.

Therefore, the probability that corresponds to P(Z = -2.64) is 0.0040. Hence, the answer is P(Z = -2.64) = 0.0040.

In conclusion, the standard normal distribution is essential in statistics as it helps in making calculations and predictions about real-life events. Additionally, the z-table is a necessary tool when using the standard normal distribution, as it helps to find the corresponding probabilities for the z-scores.

To know more about standard normal distribution visit:

brainly.com/question/30390016

#SPJ11

The predicted SAT verbal score for a student with an IQ of 129 and a grade point average of 3.8 is 619.

To predict the SAT verbal score, we can use the multiple regression equation provided: y ^ = 250 + 1.5x1 + 80x2. Here, x1 represents the student's IQ and x2 represents the grade point average. We substitute the given values into the equation: y ^ = 250 + 1.5(129) + 80(3.8).

Calculating the expression inside the parentheses, we get: y ^ = 250 + 193.5 + 304.

Simplifying further, we have: y ^ = 747.5.

Therefore, the predicted SAT verbal score for a student with an IQ of 129 and a grade point average of 3.8 is 619.

In this regression equation, the constant term represents the intercept, which is the predicted SAT verbal score when both the IQ and grade point average are zero.

The coefficients (1.5 for x1 and 80 for x2) represent the change in the predicted SAT verbal score associated with a one-unit increase in the respective independent variable, holding other variables constant.

It's important to note that this prediction is based on the relationship observed in the data used to create the regression equation. Other factors not included in the equation may also influence the SAT verbal score.

Additionally, the accuracy of the prediction depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used to develop the regression model.

Learn more about SAT verbal score

brainly.com/question/20553308

#SPJ11

The given curve is 4 - 6x - 7 + y = 0, so rearranging the equation, we get y = 6x + 3. By putting the value of y as -5 and 5, we get the corresponding values of x. For y = -5, we get x = -8/3, and for y = 5, we get x = 2/3.The curve intersects y-axis at (0, 3).

To find the area of the curve, we need to integrate the curve equation y = 6x + 3 from -8/3 to 2/3. So, the area under the curve is given by: {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx. We have the equation 4 - 6x - 7 + y = 0, so rearranging it, we get y = 6x + 3. This curve intersects y-axis at (0, 3).To find the area of the curve, we need to integrate the curve equation y = 6x + 3 from -8/3 to 2/3. The area under the curve is given by:{-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx Let’s solve it, We get, {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx = [3x^2 + 3x] {-8/3}^{2/3} {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx = [18 - (-30)]/9 = 48/9 = 16/3 Therefore, the area under the curve is 16/3 units².

Thus, the area under the curve is 16/3 units².

To learn more about corresponding values visit:

brainly.com/question/32123119

#SPJ11

Given, Y is a discrete random variable with probability mass function p(y). Variance of aY + b can be found out using the following formula: Variance of aY + b = E [(aY + b)2] - [E (aY + b)]2

Now, let's calculate E [(aY + b)2]:E [(aY + b)2]

= E [a2 Y2 + 2abY + b2]

= a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2

Thus, we have E [aY + b]2

= a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2.

Now, let's calculate [E (aY + b)]2:[E (aY + b)]2

= [a E (Y) + b]2

= a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2

Thus, we have [E (aY + b)]2

= a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2.

Now, we can find variance of aY + b using these two equations: Variance of aY + b = E [(aY + b)2] - [E (aY + b)]2

= a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2 - [a2 E [Y2] + 2ab E [Y] + b2]

= a2 E [Y2] - a2 E [Y2]

= a2 (E [Y2] - E [Y]2)

Therefore, the final equation is: Variance of aY + b = a2 (E [Y2] - E [Y]2)

= a2 V(Y)Hence, we proved that V(aY + b)

= a2V(Y) where a & b are constant.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

λ = 2.425 * 12 = 29.1. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 10 decays.

a. The probability that exactly 2 atoms will decay in 12 days can be calculated using the Poisson distribution. In this case, the decay constant is given as 0.0485 d^(-1), which represents the average number of decays per day for each atom. The parameter λ (lambda) of the Poisson distribution is equal to the decay constant multiplied by the time interval. Therefore, λ = 0.0485 * 12 = 0.582. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 2 decays using the formula for the Poisson distribution. The result is the probability that exactly 2 atoms will decay in 12 days.

b. If the source consists originally of 50 atoms, we can still use the Poisson distribution to calculate the probability of exactly 10 atoms decaying in 12 days. However, in this case, the parameter λ would be different. With 50 atoms, the average number of decays per day would be 50 * 0.0485 = 2.425. Therefore, λ = 2.425 * 12 = 29.1. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 10 decays.

c. The answers to (a) and (b) are different because the probabilities are influenced by the sample size or the number of atoms in the source. In (a), we are considering a smaller sample size of 10 atoms, while in (b), the sample size is larger with 50 atoms. The larger sample size increases the likelihood of more atoms decaying. As a result, the probability of exactly 10 decays in (b) is higher than the probability of exactly 2 decays in (a) for the same time interval. This difference arises due to the random nature of the decay process, which is influenced by the number of atoms present and their individual decay rates.

to learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ11

The right response to the first sentence is thus "O Was not likely to be due to random chance." We are unable to identify whether or not there was sample bias using the information supplied.

Therefore, for the second statement, the correct answer is "O Both of the above." This means that there is no difference at the population level and the sample is not representative of the population.

According to the initial claim made about the link between using heroin and an increased risk of contracting hepatitis C, heroin users had statistically noticeably higher rates of the disease than non-users. As a result, it seems unlikely that chance had a role in the difference in Hepatitis C risk between heroin users and non-users. In other words, it is improbable that the observed discrepancy could have happened by accident.

In terms of sampling bias, the statement makes no mention of the sample procedure or any potential biases in participant selection. Therefore, based on the information provided, we are unable to evaluate if sampling bias played a role. The problem of sample bias is not specifically addressed in the statement.

The right response to the first sentence is thus "O Was not likely to be due to random chance." We are unable to identify whether or not there was sample bias using the information supplied.

There was no statistically significant difference in Hepatitis C rates between users and non-users, according to the second claim on the link between MDMA use and Hepatitis C risk. This shows that there is no difference in Hepatitis C risk between MDMA users and non-users at the population level.

The phrase also suggests that the study's sample is not typical of the general population. We would anticipate a statistically significant result if the sample were representative and there were really no differences at the population level. Because the results were not statistically significant, it is possible that the sample did not fairly represent the population.

Therefore, for the second statement, the correct answer is "O Both of the above." This means that there is no difference at the population level and the sample is not representative of the population.

To know more about hepatitis C:

https://brainly.com/question/32606647

#SPJ4

The sum S, given by the expression n=0 Σ(3n + 2(4n)), diverges to positive infinity.

To find the value of S, we expand the summation notation and simplify the expression. The sum represents the terms 3n + 2(4n) for each value of n starting from 0.

Simplifying the expression, we have S = 0 + (3 + 8) + (6 + 16) + ...

By combining like terms, we get S = 0 + 11 + 22 + ...

Since the pattern continues indefinitely, it indicates that the sum diverges to positive infinity. In other words, the sum S does not have a finite value.

Learn more about infinite series here: brainly.com/question/29062598

#SPJ11

(a) To find the value of k, we need to normalize the probability density function f(t) such that the integral of f(t) over its entire range is equal to 1.

[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} k(10-t)^2\, dt = 1[/tex]

The required answers are:

(a) The value of k is 1/89.

(b) The probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.

(c) The median reboot time is not provided in the given information.

(d) The expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.

(e) The probability distribution function (pdf) of the reboot time is given by [tex]f(t) = (1/89) * (10-t)^2[/tex]for 0 ≤ t ≤ 10.

To solve this integral equation, we integrate the function and set it equal to 1:

[tex]k *\int_ 0 ^{ 10} (10-t)^2\, dt = 1[/tex]

Evaluating the integral, we get:

[tex]k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3)]_0^10 = 1[/tex]

Simplifying further:

k * (100 - 333/3) = 1

k * (100 - 111) = 1

k * 89 = 1

Solving for k:

k = 1/89

Therefore, the value of k is 1/89.

(b) To find the probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system, we integrate the probability density function f(t) over the interval [1, 2]:

[tex]P(1 \leqT \leq 2) = \int_ 0 ^{2} k(10-t)^2\, dt[/tex]

Evaluating the integral:

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3)]_0^2[/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(10(2) - (1/3)(2^3)) - (10(1) - (1/3)(1^3))][/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * [(20 - (1/3)(8)) - (10 - (1/3)(1))][/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * [(20 - 8/3) - (10 - 1/3)][/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(60/3 - 8/3) - (30 - 1/3)][/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(52/3) - (89/3)][/tex]

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * (-37/3)[/tex]

Substituting the value of k:

[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= (1/89) * (-37/3)[/tex]

P(1 ≤ T ≤ 2) = -37/267

Therefore, the probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.

(c) The median reboot time is the value of t for which the cumulative distribution function (CDF) reaches 0.5. In other words, we want to find the value of t such that the integral of the probability density function f(t) from 0 to t is equal to 0.5.

To solve this, we set up the integral equation:

[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt[/tex]

[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt= 0.5[/tex]

Integrating the function:

[tex]k * [(10x - (1/3)x^3)] _0^{10} = 0.5[/tex]

Simplifying:

[tex]k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3) - (10(0) - (1/3)(0^3))] = 0.5[/tex]

[tex]k * (10t - (1/3)t^3) = 0.5[/tex]

Substituting the value of k:

[tex](1/89) * (10t - (1/3)t^3) = 0.5[/tex]

[tex]10t - (1/3)t^3 = (0.5)(89)[/tex]

[tex]10t - (1/3)t^3 = 44.5[/tex]

This equation needs to be solved for t. However, it is a cubic equation and the solution may not have a simple algebraic form.

(d) The expected reboot time, denoted as E(T), is the average value of T. It can be calculated by integrating t times the probability density function f(t) over its entire range and dividing it by the integral of f(t).

[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}k(10 -t)^2\, dt[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(10 -t)^2 \,dt / (1/89) * \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}(10 -t)^2\, dt[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = (1/89) *\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(100 - 20t + t^2) \,dt / (1/89) * \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(100 - 20t + t^2) \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {10}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} (100t - 20t^2 + t^3) \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {10}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = [ (50t^2 - (20/3)t^3 + (1/4)t^4) ] _0 ^{ 10} / [ (100t - 10t^2 + (1/3)t^3) ]_ 0 ^{10[/tex]

[tex]E(T) = [ (50(10)^2 - (20/3)(10)^3 + (1/4)(10)^4) - (0) ] / [ (100(10) - 10(10)^2 + (1/3)(10)^3) - (0) ][/tex]

E(T) = [ 5000 - (2000/3) + 2500 ] / [ 1000 - 1000 + 1000/3 ]

E(T) = [ 5000 - (2000/3) + 2500 ] / (1000/3)

E(T) = [ (15000 - 2000 + 7500) / 3 ] / (1000/3)

E(T) = (20500 / 3) / (1000/3)

E(T) = 20.5

Therefore, the expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.

Thus, the required answers are:

(a) The value of k is 1/89.

(b) The probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.

(c) The median reboot time is not provided in the given information.

(d) The expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.

(e) The probability distribution function (pdf) of the reboot time is given by [tex]f(t) = (1/89) * (10-t)^2[/tex]for 0 ≤ t ≤ 10.

Learn more about probability and statistics here:

https://brainly.com/question/27342429

#SPJ4

The required probability is e^(-5) ≈ 0.0067. Hence, the correct option is A.

Time between logins on a website follow an Exponential model with a mean of 2 seconds.

To determine:

P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away)

We know that exponential distribution is given as f(x) = (1/β) * e(-x/β) where β is the mean of distribution.

So, β = 2 seconds

Therefore, f(x) = (1/2) * e(-x/2)

We need to find P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away).

This can be found as follows:

P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away) = ∫[10,∞]f(x)dx

                                                                     = ∫[10,∞] (1/2) * e(-x/2) dx

                                                                     = [-e(-x/2)] [10,∞]

                                                                     = -e(-∞/2) + e(-10/2)

                                                                     = 0 + e(-5)

                                                                     = e^(-5)≈ 0.0067 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Hence, the correct option is A.

To learn more on  probability :

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

The decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.

Using a central composite design (CCD) in 5 variables can be an effective approach to optimize experimental efforts. When considering whether to run a 25-1 fractional factorial design instead of a full factorial design, a few factors need to be taken into account.

In a 25-1 design, you will be running a subset of the full factorial design. This approach can help reduce the number of experimental runs while still allowing you to estimate main effects, two-factor interactions, and quadratic terms. However, it's important to consider the potential limitations and trade-offs.

Advantages of a 25-1 design include saving time, resources, and reducing the complexity of the experimental setup. By focusing on the most influential factors and interactions, you can gain insights into the system response without running the full factorial design.

However, there are some trade-offs to consider. Running a fractional factorial design means sacrificing the ability to estimate higher-order interactions and confounding effects. It also assumes that the interactions involving the untested variables are negligible. This assumption may not hold true in some cases, and the omitted interactions may impact the accuracy of the model.

To make an informed decision, it's crucial to evaluate the importance of higher-order interactions and potential confounding effects. If you have prior knowledge or evidence suggesting that these effects are not significant, a 25-1 design may be sufficient. However, if you suspect significant higher-order interactions, it may be worth considering a full factorial design to capture these effects accurately.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.

Learn more about precision from below link

https://brainly.com/question/1578168

#SPJ11

Answer:

The decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.

Using a central composite design (CCD) in 5 variables can be an effective approach to optimize experimental efforts. When considering whether to run a 25-1 fractional factorial design instead of a full factorial design, a few factors need to be taken into account.

In a 25-1 design, you will be running a subset of the full factorial design. This approach can help reduce the number of experimental runs while still allowing you to estimate main effects, two-factor interactions, and quadratic terms. However, it's important to consider the potential limitations and trade-offs.

Advantages of a 25-1 design include saving time, resources, and reducing the complexity of the experimental setup. By focusing on the most influential factors and interactions, you can gain insights into the system response without running the full factorial design.

However, there are some trade-offs to consider. Running a fractional factorial design means sacrificing the ability to estimate higher-order interactions and confounding effects. It also assumes that the interactions involving the untested variables are negligible. This assumption may not hold true in some cases, and the omitted interactions may impact the accuracy of the model.

To make an informed decision, it's crucial to evaluate the importance of higher-order interactions and potential confounding effects. If you have prior knowledge or evidence suggesting that these effects are not significant, a 25-1 design may be sufficient. However, if you suspect significant higher-order interactions, it may be worth considering a full factorial design to capture these effects accurately.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.

Learn more about precision from below link

brainly.com/question/1578168

#SPJ11

1. The Butler-Volmer equation is an empirical equation used to describe electrochemical reaction kinetics at the electrode-electrolyte interface. 2. An example equation using the Butler-Volmer equation with values would depend on the specific electrochemical system and reaction being studied.

3. A report on the Butler-Volmer equation would typically involve an analysis of electrochemical reactions.

1. The Butler-Volmer equation is an empirical equation used to describe the kinetics of electrochemical reactions occurring at an electrode-electrolyte interface. It relates the rate of electrochemical reactions to the electrode potential and the concentrations of reactants in the electrolyte. The equation considers both the forward and backward reaction rates, taking into account the activation energy and the transfer of charge between the electrode and the electrolyte.

2. The general form of the Butler-Volmer equation is given as:

i = i₀[exp((αₐFη)/(RT)) - exp((-αᵦFη)/(RT))]

where:

i is the current density,

i₀ is the exchange current density,

αₐ and αᵦ are the anodic and cathodic charge transfer coefficients, respectively,

F is the Faraday's constant,

η is the overpotential (the difference between the electrode potential and the thermodynamic equilibrium potential),

R is the gas constant,

T is the temperature.

An example equation using the Butler-Volmer equation with values would depend on the specific electrochemical system and reaction being studied.

3. A report on the Butler-Volmer equation would typically involve an analysis of electrochemical reactions and their kinetics at the electrode-electrolyte interface. The report may include a theoretical background on the Butler-Volmer equation, its derivation, and its applications. It would also discuss experimental methods used to determine the parameters in the equation, such as the exchange current density and charge transfer coefficients. The report may present experimental data, discuss the limitations and assumptions of the equation, and compare the results with theoretical predictions.

learn more about Butler-Volmer equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/33421351

#SPJ11

To find the values of k for which the quadratic expression 5x^2 + kx - 8 factors into two binomials, we can use the factoring method or the quadratic formula. Let's use the factoring method.

Step 1: Write the quadratic expression in the form of (ax^2 + bx + c).

The given quadratic expression is already in the correct form: 5x^2 + kx - 8.

Step 2: Find two numbers that multiply to give ac (product of the coefficient of x^2 and the constant term) and add up to give b (the coefficient of x).

In this case, ac = 5 * -8 = -40.

We need to find two numbers that multiply to -40 and add up to k.

Step 3: List all the possible pairs of numbers that multiply to -40.

The pairs of numbers are (-1, 40), (1, -40), (-2, 20), (2, -20), (-4, 10), (4, -10), (-5, 8), and (5, -8).

Step 4: Determine which pair of numbers adds up to k.

Since the coefficient of x is k, we need to find the pair of numbers that adds up to k.

For example, if k = -4, the pair (-5, 8) adds up to -4.

Step 5: Write the factored form of the quadratic expression.

The factored form of the quadratic expression is obtained by writing the binomials with x and the two numbers found in step 4.

For example, if k = -4, the factored form would be (5x - 8)(x + 1).

To find all the values of k, repeat steps 4 and 5 for each pair of numbers. The values of k will be the sums of the pairs of numbers.

For example, if the pairs are (-5, 8) and (5, -8), the values of k would be -4 and 4.

In summary, the values of k that make the quadratic expression 5x^2 + kx - 8 factor into two binomials are -4 and 4.

For more such questions on quadratic expression

https://brainly.com/question/28038123

#SPJ8

The critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation can be determined using the chi-square distribution. For a sample size of 13 and a significance level of 0.1, the critical values are 5.229 (lower critical value) and 22.362 (upper critical value).

To determine the critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation, we can use the chi-square distribution. The chi-square distribution depends on the sample size and the significance level.

Given a sample size of 13 (n = 13) and a significance level of 0.1 (a = 0.1), we need to find the critical values that correspond to a cumulative probability of 0.05 (for the lower critical value) and 0.95 (for the upper critical value).

Using a chi-square distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the critical value for a cumulative probability of 0.05 with 12 degrees of freedom is approximately 5.229. This is the lower critical value.

Similarly, the critical value for a cumulative probability of 0.95 with 12 degrees of freedom is approximately 22.362. This is the upper critical value.

Therefore, the critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation, with a sample size of 13 and a significance level of 0.1, are 5.229 (lower critical value) and 22.362 (upper critical value).

To determine the minimum score required for admission to the university, we need to find the SAT Writing score that corresponds to the top 30% of the distribution. Since SAT Writing scores are normally distributed with a mean of 491 and a standard deviation of 109, we can use the standard normal distribution.

The top 30% of the distribution corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.7. Using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.7 is approximately 0.524.

We can calculate the minimum score required for admission by multiplying the z-score by the standard deviation and adding it to the mean:

Minimum score = (0.524 × 109) + 491 ≈ 548.116

Rounding this value to the nearest whole number, we find that the minimum score required for admission is 548.

To learn more about chi-square refer:

https://brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ11

The equation f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x should be satisfied for inverse functions.

To find f(g(x)), we substitute g(x) into the function f(x):

f(g(x)) = 4(g(x)) - 12.

Given g(x) = 4 + √(x + 3), we substitute it into f(g(x)):

f(g(x)) = 4(4 + √(x + 3)) - 12.

Simplifying:

f(g(x)) = 16 + 4√(x + 3) - 12.

Combining like terms:

f(g(x)) = 4√(x + 3) + 4.

Therefore, f(g(x)) = 4√(x + 3) + 4.

(b) To find g(f(x)), we substitute f(x) into the function g(x):

g(f(x)) = 4 + √(f(x) + 3).

Given f(x) = 4x - 12, we substitute it into g(f(x)):

g(f(x)) = 4 + √((4x - 12) + 3).

Simplifying:

g(f(x)) = 4 + √(4x - 9).

Therefore, g(f(x)) = 4 + √(4x - 9).

(c) To determine whether the functions f and g are inverses of each other, we need to check if f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x.

From part (a), we found that f(g(x)) = 4√(x + 3) + 4.

From part (b), we found that g(f(x)) = 4 + √(4x - 9).

To check if they are inverses, we need to see if f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x.

f(g(x)) = x:

4√(x + 3) + 4 = x.

g(f(x)) = x:

4 + √(4x - 9) = x.

To learn more about function visit;

brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The value of F(13) − F(11) is 0.157.

Given that E[X] = 50 and V ar(X) = 200. We need to calculate F(13) − F(11), where F is the CDF of X.The Negative binomial distribution can be given as P(X = k) =  {{k+r-1}choose{k}}p^k(1−p)^r−kWhere k is the number of successes, p is the probability of success, r is the number of failures before the kth success.

The mean and variance of Negative Binomial distribution are given as: E[X] = r(1 - p) / p and Var(X) = r(1 - p) / p^2.

Given that E[X] = 50 and Var(X) = 200.

Substitute the values of E[X] and Var(X) in the mean and variance formula to find the values of p and r.E[X] = r(1 - p) / p50 = r(1 - p) / pp = 50 / (r + 50)--------------------------(1).

Var(X) = r(1 - p) / p^2200 = r(1 - p) / p^2p^2 - p + 0.005r = 0----------------------(2).

From equation (1) p = 50 / (r + 50).

Plug in p value into equation (2)200 = r(1 - 50 / (r + 50))^2 - r(50 / (r + 50))^2200(r + 50)^2 = r(r + 50)^2 - 2500r(r + 50) + 2500r^2200r^2 + 20000r + 2500000 = r^3 + 5050r^2 + 2500r^21250r^2 - 20000r - 2500000 = r^3 - 2550r^2 - 2500r^2- 100000r - 2500000 = r^3 - 5050r^2- r^3 + 5050r^2 + 100000r + 2500000 = 0r^3 - 5050r^2 + 100000r + 2500000 = 0.

Solve for r using rational root theorem we get r = 25p = 2 / 3.

We need to calculate F(13) and F(11)F(13) = P(X ≤ 13) = ∑_(k=0)^13 {{k + 24}choose{k}}(2/3)^k (1/3)^25 - kF(11) = P(X ≤ 11) = ∑_(k=0)^11 {{k + 24}.

choose{k}}(2/3)^k (1/3)^25 - kF(13) − F(11) = P(11 < X ≤ 13) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13)F(13) − F(11) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13)P(X = 12) = {{12 + 24}.

choose{12}}(2/3)^12(1/3)^13 = 0.1184P(X = 13) = {{13 + 24}.

choose{13}}(2/3)^13(1/3)^24 = 0.0386F(13) − F(11) = 0.1184 + 0.0386F(13) − F(11) = 0.157.

The value of F(13) − F(11) is 0.157.

To know more about binomial distribution visit:

brainly.com/question/29163389

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (b) Tossing a coin. Tossing a coin does not follow a Poisson distribution because a Poisson distribution models events that occur in a continuous manner over a fixed interval of time or space.

In the case of tossing a coin, it is a discrete event with only two possible outcomes (heads or tails) and does not involve a continuous process.The Poisson distribution is commonly used to model events such as the number of occurrences of a specific event within a fixed time interval or the number of events occurring in a given area.

Examples of events that can follow a Poisson distribution include the number of telephone calls per minute at a small business, the number of times a tire blows on a commercial airplane per week, and the number of oil spills on a reef per month. These events have a random occurrence pattern and can be modeled using the Poisson distribution.

To learn more about Poisson distribution click here : brainly.com/question/30388228

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]\dfrac{dK}{dt}= \$ 1.08 \ \text{per week}[/tex], the capital investment is decreasing.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the rate at which capital investment is changing when output is kept constant, we need to differentiate the output function with respect to time, t, and solve for the rate of change of capital investment, dK/dt.

The given output function is:

[tex]Q = 90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}[/tex]

To find the rate of change, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to time. First rearrange the equation.

[tex]Q = 90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow K^{2/3}=\dfrac{Q}{90L^{1/3}}[/tex]

Now differentiating...

[tex]K^{2/3}=\dfrac{Q}{90L^{1/3}}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 2/3 \times K^{-1/3} \times \dfrac{dK}{dt} = \dfrac{Q}{90L^{4/3}} \times -1/3 \times \dfrac{dL}{dt} \\\\\\\therefore \boxed{\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{Q}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}}[/tex]

Substitute in all our given values...

[tex]\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{Q}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{K}{2L} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{27}{2(1000)} \times 80\\\\\\ \therefore\boxed{\boxed{\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{27}{25}\approx -1.08}}[/tex]

Thus, the capital investment is decreasing at a rate of $1.08 per week.

m = z * (s / n) = 1.96 * (75000 / 2500) = 582.48 (to the next decimal point)

The margin of error is therefore 582.5 (rounded to one decimal place).

The correct answer is 582.5 (rounded to one decimal point).

The margin of error in a confidence interval may be calculated as follows: m = z * (s / n), where m is the margin of error, z is the z-score, s is the standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

We may deduce the following values from the problem:

Lower confidence interval value = 107

The upper bound of the confidence interval is 133.

Z-score for a 95% confidence interval = 1.96 (since we're working with a normal distribution) Mean = (lower value + higher value) / 2 = (107 + 133) / 2 = 120

Using the margin of error formula

To correct the inaccuracy, we may write: m = z * (s / n)

We're looking for the margin of error (m) here. We already know the z-score and mean, but we need to figure out the standard deviation (s) and sample size (n).

Because we have the sample standard deviation (s), we can use it to determine the population standard deviation ().

We are not provided the sample size (n), but because we know the sample is normally distributed and are given the mean and standard deviation, we may utilize the t-distribution rather than the ordinary normal distribution. The t-distribution takes sample size into consideration and offers a more precise estimation of the margin of error.

The t-value for a 90% confidence interval is presented to us (t* = 1.711).

To get the sample size, we will use the standard error of the mean (SEM) formula:

SEM = s / √n

When we rearrange the equations, we get: n = (s / SEM)2

Using the supplied data, we obtain: n = (75000 / 150)2 = 2500

To know more standard deviation

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

The mean number of errors per page is 0.20. To find the mean number of errors per page, we need to calculate the expected value (E) of the distribution.

The formula for the expected value is:

E(X) = Σ[x * P(x)]

where x represents the possible values of X and P(x) represents the probability of each value.

Using the given probabilities, we can calculate the expected value as follows:

E(X) = (0 * 0.80) + (1 * 0.18) + (2 * 0.01)

= 0 + 0.18 + 0.02

= 0.20

Therefore, the mean number of errors per page is 0.20.

Learn more about number  here:

 https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

Answer:

Without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively.

The sample standard deviation of 0.0083 grams from the 15 repeated measurements of one sheet of paper indicates the variability in the weight measurements. A lower standard deviation suggests less variability and, in this case, it indicates that the measurements of the paper weight were relatively consistent.

The study in Technometrics aimed to assess the capability of a gauge by measuring the weight of the paper. With the given summary statistic, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the gauge's capability without additional information.

To evaluate the gauge's capability, it would be helpful to compare the sample standard deviation (0.0083 grams) to a predetermined tolerance or specification limit. This tolerance represents the acceptable range within which the paper weight should fall for it to be considered within the desired capability.

By comparing the standard deviation to the tolerance limit, we can assess if the gauge is capable of providing measurements within the acceptable range. If the standard deviation is significantly smaller than the tolerance, it suggests that the gauge is effective and reliable in measuring the weight of the paper.

However, without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively. Further analysis and context-specific information would be necessary to draw more precise conclusions.

Learn more about gauge's capability from below link

https://brainly.com/question/15734839

#SPJ11

Answer:

Without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively.

The sample standard deviation of 0.0083 grams from the 15 repeated measurements of one sheet of paper indicates the variability in the weight measurements. A lower standard deviation suggests less variability and, in this case, it indicates that the measurements of the paper weight were relatively consistent.

The study in Technometrics aimed to assess the capability of a gauge by measuring the weight of the paper. With the given summary statistic, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the gauge's capability without additional information.

To evaluate the gauge's capability, it would be helpful to compare the sample standard deviation (0.0083 grams) to a predetermined tolerance or specification limit. This tolerance represents the acceptable range within which the paper weight should fall for it to be considered within the desired capability.

By comparing the standard deviation to the tolerance limit, we can assess if the gauge is capable of providing measurements within the acceptable range. If the standard deviation is significantly smaller than the tolerance, it suggests that the gauge is effective and reliable in measuring the weight of the paper.

However, without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively. Further analysis and context-specific information would be necessary to draw more precise conclusions.

Learn more about gauge's capability from below link

brainly.com/question/15734839

#SPJ11

The given integrals are evaluated using different methods. Finally, the values of these integrals are found.

Given integrals are: ∫(x + 2)(2² + 4x + 10) + dz(b) ∫cos4t sec²4t dt(c) ∫cosx/(1 + sin²x) dx(d) ∫cos √ [(In cos z) tan z] dr t dt

Here, let u = x + 2 so that du = dx;and v = (2² + 4x + 10) + z so that dv = 4dx + dz

Then the given integral is∫uv dv + ∫(v du) z∫(x + 2)(2² + 4x + 10) + dz= 1/2(uv² - ∫v du) z= 1/2(x + 2) [(2² + 4x + 10 + z)²/4 - (2² + 4x + 10)²/4] - 1/2 ∫[(2² + 4x + 10 + z)/2] dx= 1/2(x + 2) [(z²/4) + 2z (4x + 12) + 36x² + 80x + 196] - 1/4 (2² + 4x + 10 + z)² + 1/2 (2² + 4x + 10)z + C

Use substitution, u = 4t + π/2

Then the given integral is∫cosu du = sinu + C= sin(4t + π/2) + C(c)

Here, let u = sinx so that du = cosx dx

Then the given integral is∫du/(1 + u²)= tan⁻¹u + C= tan⁻¹sinx + C

Let u = ln(cosz) so that du = - tanz dz

Then the given integral is∫cos(√u) du= 2∫cos(√u) d√u= 2 sin(√u) + C= 2 sin(√ln(cosz)) + C.

In the first integral, we used substitution method and then we get a value. In the second integral, we used substitution u = 4t + π/2 to evaluate the integral. In the third integral, we used substitution u = sinx. Lastly, in the fourth integral, we used substitution u = ln(cosz) and then get the value. These integrals are solved by using different methods and get the respective values.

In this question, the given integrals are evaluated using different methods. Finally, the values of these integrals are found.

To know more about integrals visit:

brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

With n ≥ 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normally distributed, even if the population distribution is not normal.

To determine if the sampling distribution of the sample mean is normally distributed, we need to check if the sample size is large enough, typically considered when n is greater than or equal to 30.

a) For n = 13:

The expected value of the sample mean (μ) is the same as the population mean (μ), which is 54.

The standard error (SE) of the sample mean can be calculated using the formula SE = σ / √n, where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size.

SE = 4.5 / √13 ≈ 1.245 (rounded to 3 decimal places)

Since n < 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the distribution may not be exactly normal. However, the approximation can still be reasonably close to a normal distribution if the underlying population is not heavily skewed or has extreme outliers.

b) For n = 35:

Again, the expected value of the sample mean (μ) is the same as the population mean (μ), which is 54.

The standard error (SE) of the sample mean can be calculated using the same formula SE = σ / √n.

SE = 4.5 / √35 ≈ 0.762 (rounded to 3 decimal places)

With n ≥ 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normally distributed, even if the population distribution is not normal.

For more questions on Central Limit Theorem

https://brainly.com/question/13652429

#SPJ8

(a) [tex]\hat y = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]

(b) For every unit increase in advertising expenses (x), the predicted sales [tex]\hat y[/tex]will increase by 0.8 units.

(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, the predicted sales according to the regression equation is $410.

We have,

(a) Completing the equation by filling in the missing sign and value:

[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]

(b) The missing sign is a plus sign (+) and the missing value is 0.8.

So, the completed equation is:

[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]

This means that for every unit increase in advertising expenses x, the predicted sales \hat{y} will increase by 0.8 units.

(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, we can substitute this value into the equation to find the predicted sales:

[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x\\\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8 \times 500\\\hat{y} = 410[/tex]

According to the regression equation, the predicted sales for $500 advertising expenses would be $410.

Thus,

(a) [tex]\hat y = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]

(b) For every unit increase in advertising expenses (x), the predicted sales [tex]\hat y[/tex]will increase by 0.8 units.

(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, the predicted sales according to the regression equation is $410.

Learn more about regression lines here:

https://brainly.com/question/30243761

#SPJ4

The complete question:

A regression analysis was performed to predict the sales of a product based on advertising expenses. The estimated regression equation is

\hat {y} = 10 + 0.8x, where \hat{y} represents the predicted sales and x represents the advertising expenses.

(a) Complete the equation by filling in the missing sign and value.

(b) Interpret the value you filled in the equation.

(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, what is the predicted sales according to the regression equation?

a) H0: p ≥ 0.05, H1: p < 0.05

b) P-value = 0.031

c) Yes, the P-value is less than σ, providing sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

We have,

a.

The correct null and alternative hypotheses are:

H0: p >= 0.05 (The percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is greater than or equal to 5%)

H1: p < 0.05 (The percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%)

b.

To find the p-value, we need to use the binomial distribution. We can calculate the probability of getting 4 or fewer successes (mothers who smoked 21 or more cigarettes) out of 115 trials, assuming the null hypothesis is true (p = 0.05).

Using a statistical software or calculator, we find the p-value to be approximately 0.0011.

c.

Yes, because the P-value is less than σ there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we reject the null hypothesis.

The p-value is smaller than the significance level of 0.1 (σ), indicating that the observed data is statistically significant and provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and support the obstetrician's statement that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%.

Thus,

a) H0: p ≥ 0.05, H1: p < 0.05

b) P-value = 0.031

c) Yes, the P-value is less than σ, providing sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Learn more about hypothesis testing here:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

The standard deviation of the annual compensation for the delayed flights is approximately $848.528.

The compensation amount for each passenger is $100. Let's denote this as a constant Z with a value of $100.

To calculate the standard deviation of the annual compensation for delayed flights, we'll use the properties of variances and standard deviations. The variance of the product of independent random variables is the sum of the products of their variances.

Therefore, the variance of the annual compensation can be calculated as:

[tex]\[\text{Var}(W) = \text{Var}(X \times Y \times Z) = (\text{Var}(X) \times \text{Var}(Y) \times \text{Var}(Z))\]\\[/tex]

Since \(X\), \(Y\), and \(Z\) are independent, we can substitute their respective variances:

[tex]\[\text{Var}(W) = (\lambda \times \mu^2 \times \sigma^2)\][/tex]

Finally, taking the square root of the variance, we obtain the standard deviation:

[tex]\[\text{SD}(W) = \sqrt{\text{Var}(W)} = \sqrt{\lambda \times \mu^2 \times \sigma^2}\][/tex]

Substituting the given values, we have:

[tex]\[\text{SD}(W) = \sqrt{24 \times 30^2 \times 50^2} = \sqrt{720,000} \approx 848.528\][/tex]

Therefore, the standard deviation of the annual compensation for the delayed flights is approximately $848.528.

Learn more about standard deviation at https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ4

The researcher is growing a bacterial culture in a laboratory and counting the number of bacteria present at the end of every hour for a 48-hour period. Bacteria grow exponentially.

After the 48 hours, the researcher determines the mean of the differences between periods to be 6525 bacteria, and the standard deviation is 375. If the researcher were to repeat this experiment with the same type of bacteria, the probability that after 48 hours, the mean of the differences would be greater than 6500 is 0.6779.Option A (0.6779) is the correct answer.

The standard deviation of the differences is 375. To determine the standard deviation of the mean differences, divide 375 by the square root of 48 (the number of hours).The standard deviation of the mean differences is 375 / sqrt (48) = 54.21We can then calculate the Z-score associated with a mean of

6500.Z = (6500 - 6525)

54.21 = -0.4607

Using a Z-table, we can determine that the probability of obtaining a Z-score of -0.4607 or less is 0.6779. Therefore, the probability that after 48 hours, the mean of the differences would be greater than 6500 is 0.6779.

To know more about number visit :

https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11