Yes, the function y = 5^x is an exponential function.The initial value of an exponential function is the value of y when x = 0. In this case, when x = 0, y = 5^0 = 1. Therefore, the initial value of the function is 1.The base of an exponential function is the constant factor by which y changes when x increases by 1. In this case, when x increases by 1, y is multiplied by 5. Therefore, the base of the function is 5.
Would a line through these two points A and B be a good fit for the data? Why or why not?
(Please don’t mind the other words! TvT
a bag of elven counters
5 of the counters are white
a counter is taken out of the bag at random and not replaced
a second counter is taken out of the bag
calculate the probality that only one of the counters is white
Step-by-step explanation:
Probabilities
The question describes an event where two counters are taken out of a bag that originally contains 11 counters, 5 of which are white.
Let's call W the event of picking a white counter in any of the two extractions, and N when the counter is not white. The sample space of the random experience is Ω = {WW, W N, NW, N N}
We are required to compute the probability that only one of the counters is white. It means that the favorable options are A = {W N, NW}
Let's calculate both probabilities separately. At first, there are 11 counters, and 5 of them are white. Thus, the probability of picking a white counter is 5/11.
Once a white counter is out, there are only 4 of them and 10 counters in total. The probability to pick a non-white counter is now 6/10.
Thus, the option WN has the probability P(WN) = 5/11 x 6/10 = 30/110 = 3/11
Now for the second option NW. The initial probability to pick a non-white counter is 6/11.
The probability to pick a white counter is 5/10
Thus, the option NW has the probability P(WN) = 6/11 x 5/10 = 30/110 = 3/11
P(A) = 3/11 + 3/11 = 6/11.
SO THE ANSWER IS 6/11!!If this helped you. Could I have a brainliest by any chance? And tell me if I am wrong! :D Bye now! :D And you are welcome.
Match the term with the definition: The length of the line through the center of a circle that touches two points on the edge of the circle. a) Radius b) Circumference c) Diameter d) Tangent Line
what is 2.5<1/3(x-18) ??
Answer:
x > 25.5
Step-by-step explanation:
2.5 < [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] (x - 18 ) ← multiply both sides by 3 to clear the fraction
7.5 < x - 18 ( ad 18 to both sides )
25.5 < x , then
x > 25.5
suppose you roll a pair of fair dice repeatedly. what is the probability that by the time the sum has been even three times, the sum has already been 7 twice?
The probability that by the time the sum has been even three times, the sum has already been 7 twice is 1/36.
This is because the total number of possible combinations of two dice is 36, and only one combination, (3,4), has the sum of 7 and is also an even number.
Suppose you roll a pair of fair dice repeatedly : https://brainly.com/question/31079082
#SPJ11
subtract 13 5/8 - 3 2/3
Answer:
9 23/24
Step-by-step explanation:
Change both mixed fractions to improper fractions
13 5/8=109/8
3 2/3=8
Now substract: 109/8 - 8/3= 10 23/24.
Hope this helps!!
this answer to the problem. Kind of tricky.
suppose we should solve the following equation:
[tex]s = \frac{13}{2} (12 + 75)[/tex]
which equals 565.5
The closing stock prices for a particular social media company follows an unknown distribution with a mean of $150 and a standard deviation of $25. An investor is looking to find the likelihood of the closing stock price falling above the average. After randomly selecting n=52 closing stock prices from the social media company, use a calculator to find the probability that the sample mean is between $155 and $160.
Rounded to three decimal places.
Rounded to three decimal places, the probability that the sample mean is between $155 and $160 is 0.072.
To find the probability that the sample mean is between $155 and $160, we will use the Central Limit Theorem. The Central Limit Theorem states that the distribution of the sample mean (with a large enough sample size) will be approximately normally distributed with the same mean and a standard deviation equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.
Mean of the sample distribution: μ = $150
Standard deviation of the sample distribution: [tex]σ/√n = $25/√52 ≈ $3.46[/tex]
Now, we'll calculate the z-scores for $155 and $160:
[tex]Z1 = (155 - 150) / 3.46 ≈ 1.445[/tex]
[tex]Z2 = (160 - 150) / 3.46 ≈ 2.890[/tex]
Using a z-table or calculator, we can find the probability for each z-score:
[tex]P(Z1) ≈ 0.9259[/tex]
[tex]P(Z2) ≈ 0.9981[/tex]
Now, we can find the probability between the two z-scores:
[tex]P(1.445 < Z < 2.890) = P(Z2) - P(Z1) = 0.9981 - 0.9259 = 0.0722[/tex]
for such more questions on Standard deviation
https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
Choose the equation that represents the line passing through the point (2, −5) with a slope of −3
The equation that represents the line passing through the point (2, -5) with a slope of -3 is y = -3x + 1 (option D).
To derive the equation of a line, we need to use the point-slope formula, which is y - y1 = m(x - x1), where m is the slope of the line and (x1, y1) is a point on the line. Plugging in the given values, we have:
y - (-5) = -3(x - 2)
Simplifying this expression, we get:
y + 5 = -3x + 6
y = -3x + 1
Thus, the equation that represents the line passing through the point (2, -5) with a slope of -3 is y = -3x + 1.
Learn more about Slope:
https://brainly.com/question/16949303
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Choose the equation below that represents the line passing through the point (2, - 5) with a slope of −3.
A.) y = −3x − 13
B.) y = −3x + 11
C.) y = −3x + 13
D.) y = −3x + 1
Answer:
The answer is y = -3x + 1
Huan has $100 to spend on video games. If each video game is $40 and he pays $5 in tax, how much money does Huan have left over?
Answer: $15
Step-by-step explanation:
If he spends $80 on two games because if he was to buy three games he would be over his $100. Plus tax is $85.
There are 8 red cards, 6 blue cards, 7 purple cards, and 4 green cards in a hat.
Part A. What is the theoretical probability of drawing a red card from the hat?
Part B. In a trial, a card is drawn from the hat and then replaced 1,150 times. A red card is drawn 437 times. How much greater is the experimental probability than the theoretical probability?
Oh, wait- I figured it out hehe
Part A: The theoretical probability of drawing a red card is 0.32 or 32%.
Part B: The experimental probability of drawing a red card is 0.38 or 38%, and it is 6% greater than the theoretical probability.
Part A: The theoretical probability of drawing a red card from the hat is the number of red cards divided by the total number of cards in the hat:
[tex]P_{red}[/tex] = 8 ÷ (8 + 6 + 7 + 4)
= 8 ÷ 25
= 0.32 or 32%.
Part B: The experimental probability of drawing a red card can be calculated by dividing the number of times a red card was drawn by the total number of trials:
[tex]P_{red}[/tex] = 437 ÷ 1150
= 0.38 or 38%.
The difference between the experimental probability and the theoretical probability can be calculated as follows:
0.38 - 0.32
= 0.06 or 6%
To learn more about probability follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30231190
#SPJ1
you are making cookies and missing a key ingredient eggs. you have most of the other ingredients, except you only have 1.33 cups of butter. the recipe calls for two cups of butter and three eggs to make six dozen cookies. how many eggs do you need use all of the butter?
By using equation in two variable we need to use 2 eggs to make all the cookies with 1.33 cups of butter.
To make six dozen cookies, the recipe calls for two cups of butter and three eggs. We can use proportionality to solve this question: If 2 cups of butter require 3 eggs to make 6 dozen cookies, then 1.33 cups of butter require x eggs to make all of the cookies.
x eggs = (1.33 cups of butter x 3 eggs)/(2 cups of butter). x = 1.99 eggs. Since we cannot use .99 eggs to make cookies, we would need to round up to the nearest whole number of eggs.
Therefore, we need to use 2 eggs to make all the cookies with 1.33 cups of butter.
To know more about equation in two variable refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29209545
#SPJ11
find the solution of the system of equations 2x + 6y = -16 -6x - 3y = -27 i need a answer neoowww
The solution of the system of equations are (7,-5).
Define about the system of equations?A set or group of equations that you solve all at once is referred to as a "system" of equations. The fundamental linear system comprises two equations as well as two variables. Linear equations (those that graph simply straight lines) are easier to understand than non-linear ones.The system of equations:
2x + 6y = -16 and -6x - 3y = -27
2x + 6y = -16
Divide by 2
x + 3y = -8 ..eq 1
-6x - 3y = -27 ..eq 2
Use elimination method.
Add eq 1 from 2
x + 3y -6x -3y = -8 - 27
-5x = -35
x = 7
3y = -8 - 7
y = -15/3
y = -5
Thus, the solution of the system of equations are (7, -5).
Know more about the system of equation
https://brainly.com/question/25976025
#SPJ1
Matt wants to buy a tie. The prices of similar ties offered by four different online retailers are listed. $15.50, $17.50, $16.00, $18.00 What is the mean absolute deviation of the prices of the ties?
Answer: mean-16.75
population size- 4
Step-by-step explanation:
the joint probability distribution of the number x of cars and the number y of buses per signal cycle at a proposed left-turn lane is displayed in the accompanying joint probability table. y p(x, y) 0 1 2 x 0 0.010 0.015 0.025 1 0.020 0.030 0.050 2 0.050 0.075 0.125 3 0.060 0.090 0.150 4 0.040 0.060 0.100 5 0.020 0.030 0.050 (a) what is the probability that there is exactly one car and exactly one bus during a cycle? (b) what is the probability that there is at most one car and at most one bus during a cycle? (c) what is the probability that there is exactly one car during a cycle? exactly one bus? p(exactly one car)
(a) The probability that there is exactly one car and exactly one bus during a cycle is 0.020.
(b) The probability that there is at most one car and at most one bus during a cycle is 0.105.
(c) The probability that there is exactly one car during a cycle is 0.100, and the probability that there is exactly one bus during a cycle is 0.200. The probability that there is exactly one car is also 0.050.
(a) To find the probability that there is exactly one car and exactly one bus during a cycle, we need to look at the cell in the table where x = 1 and y = 1. This cell has a probability of 0.020. Therefore, the probability that there is exactly one car and exactly one bus during a cycle is 0.020.
(b) To find the probability that there is at most one car and at most one bus during a cycle, we need to add up the probabilities of the cells where either x = 0 or x = 1, and either y = 0 or y = 1. These cells are
x = 0, y = 0: 0.025
x = 0, y = 1: 0.010
x = 1, y = 0: 0.050
x = 1, y = 1: 0.020
Adding up these probabilities, we get
0.025 + 0.010 + 0.050 + 0.020 = 0.105
Therefore, the probability that there is at most one car and at most one bus during a cycle is 0.105.
(c) To find the probability that there is exactly one car during a cycle, we need to add up the probabilities of the cells where x = 1. These cells are
x = 1, y = 0: 0.050
x = 1, y = 1: 0.020
x = 1, y = 2: 0.030
Adding up these probabilities, we get
0.050 + 0.020 + 0.030 = 0.100
Therefore, the probability that there is exactly one car during a cycle is 0.100.
To find the probability that there is exactly one bus during a cycle, we need to add up the probabilities of the cells where y = 1. These cells are
x = 0, y = 1: 0.010
x = 1, y = 1: 0.020
x = 2, y = 1: 0.050
x = 3, y = 1: 0.060
x = 4, y = 1: 0.040
x = 5, y = 1: 0.020
Adding up these probabilities, we get
0.010 + 0.020 + 0.050 + 0.060 + 0.040 + 0.020 = 0.200
Therefore, the probability that there is exactly one bus during a cycle is 0.200.
Finally, the probability that there is exactly one car can also be obtained by summing the probabilities of the cells in the first row of the table
0.025 + 0.010 + 0.015 = 0.050
Learn more about probability here
brainly.com/question/11234923
#SPJ4
if 80% of people can read and you have a sample size of 11 people. how many people would you need to interview to be 87% sure that 7 of the 11 people could read
There are 11 people in your sample size and 80% of them can read.
To be 87% sure that 7 of the 11 people could read, you would need to interview eight people.
To calculate this, you need to use a binomial probability formula.
This formula will allow you to calculate the number of successes (people who can read) that must be achieved in order to have an 87% certainty that the sample size of 11 people is representative of the population.
The formula you need to use is P(x) = n! / (x! (n - x)!).
You'll want to plug in x = 7, n = 8. This will give you the probability of 8 successes in 8 trials, which is equal to 0.87. Therefore, you will need to interview 8 people in order to be 87% sure that 7 of the 11 people could read.
To know more about binomial probability click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12474772#
#SPJ11
an actuary has discovered that policyholders are three times as likely to file two claims as to file four claims. if the number of claims filed has a poisson distribution, what is the standard deviation of the number of claims filed?
The standard deviation of the number of claims filed, in this case, is equal to 1.732. This is an important metric for the actuary, as it provides an indication of how much variation there is in the number of claims filed.
The standard deviation of the number of claims filed is equal to the square root of the mean. In this case, the mean is equal to three. Thus, the standard deviation of the number of claims filed is equal to the square root of three, which is equal to 1.732.
To explain further, the Poisson distribution is a discrete probability distribution that is used to calculate the probability of a certain number of events occurring within a given time interval. It is based on the assumption that these events occur independently and at a constant rate. In this case, the rate is equal to the mean, which is equal to three. Thus, the standard deviation is equal to the square root of the mean.
The standard deviation of the number of claims filed is an important metric for the actuary, as it provides an indication of how much variation there is in the number of claims filed. The larger the standard deviation, the greater the amount of variation, and vice versa. In this case, the standard deviation is relatively low, which suggests that the number of claims filed is relatively consistent.
In conclusion, the standard deviation of the number of claims filed, in this case, is equal to 1.732. This is an important metric for the actuary, as it provides an indication of how much variation there is in the number of claims filed.
See more about Poisson distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/4484439
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP MARKING BRAINLEIST JUST ANSWER ASAP
Answer:
[tex]\textsf{The value of t is 14m. }[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
To find:-
The value of "t" .Answer:-
F I G U R E : -
[tex]\setlength{\unitlength}{1 cm}\begin{picture}(0,0)\thicklines\qbezier(1,1)(1,1)(6,1)\put(0.4,0.5){\bf D}\qbezier(1,1)(1,1)(1.6,4)\put(6.2,0.5){\bf C}\qbezier(1.6,4)(1.6,4)(6.6,4)\put(1,4){\bf A}\qbezier(6,1)(6,1)(6.6,4)\put(6.9,3.8){\bf B}\multiput(3,.5)(0,4){2}{$\sf 13m $}\multiput(1,2.5)(5.5,0){2}{$\sf t $}\put(5,-2){$\boxed{\bf{-\ By }\ \bf " Tony Stark"}$}\end{picture}[/tex]
As we know that the perimeter of a parallelogram is the sum of all the side lengths of it . Also we know that the opposite sides are equal in a parallelogram. Therefore, here the two other sides AD and DC would be "t" and "13m" respectively.
Now also we are given that the perimeter of the parallelogram is 54m . So we can create a equation to find out "t" as ,
[tex]:\sf\implies Perimeter = 13m + t + 13c
m + t\\[/tex]
Since the perimeter is 54m , therefore;
[tex]:\sf\implies 54m = 26m + 2t \\[/tex]
Subtract 26m on both the sides,
[tex]:\sf\implies 54m - 26m = 2t\\[/tex]
Simplify,
[tex]:\sf\implies 28m = 2t \\[/tex]
Divide both the sides by "2" ,
[tex]:\sf\implies t = \dfrac{28m}{2} \\[/tex]
Simplify,
[tex]:\sf\implies \pink{ t = 14m } \\[/tex]
Hence the value of t is 14m .
find the probability that a person rolling a die gets a) the first 2 on the third roll b) the first 2 on the fifth roll
The probability that a person rolling a die gets the first 2 on the third roll is 25/216 and the first 2 on the fifth roll is 15625/7776.
The probability that a person rolling a die gets a) the first 2 on the third roll b) the first 2 on the fifth roll are calculated as follows:
(a) The probability of getting a 2 on any roll is 1/6.The probability of not getting a 2 on the first roll is 5/6The probability of not getting a 2 on the second roll is also 5/6The probability of getting a 2 on the third roll is 1/6Therefore, the probability of getting a 2 on the third roll is: 5/6 × 5/6 × 1/6 = 25/216
(b) The probability of getting a 2 on any roll is 1/6.The probability of not getting a 2 on the first roll is 5/6The probability of not getting a 2 on the second roll is also 5/6The probability of not getting a 2 on the third roll is also 5/6The probability of not getting a 2 on the fourth roll is also 5/6The probability of getting a 2 on the fifth roll is 1/6Therefore, the probability of getting a 2 on the fifth roll is: 5/6 × 5/6 × 5/6 × 5/6 × 1/6 = 15625/7776
To know more about probability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11
how would you interpret the findings of a correlation study that reported a linear correlation coefficient of 0.3?
The linear correlation coefficient of 0.3 indicates a moderate positive correlation between the two variables.
This suggests that when one variable increases, the other variable tends to increase too. However, there is not a strong linear relationship between the two variables, meaning that the increase in one variable does not guarantee a predictable change in the other variable.
When interpreting the findings of a correlation study, it is important to note the strength of the relationship between the two variables. A linear correlation coefficient of 0.3 indicates a moderate positive correlation, meaning that the two variables increase together but there is not a strong linear relationship between the two variables.
This means that the increase in one variable does not guarantee a predictable change in the other variable. To put it another way, the strength of the correlation means that when one variable increases, it is likely that the other will increase as well, but it is not guaranteed.
Therefore, caution should be used when making predictions based on the results of a correlation study.
To know more about linear correlation coefficient click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/24881420#
#SPJ11
if a fair die is rolled 5 times, what is the probability, rounded to the nearest thousandth, of getting at least 2 fours?
So the probability, rounded to the nearest thousandth, of getting at least 2 fours in 5 rolls of a fair die is 0.194.
What is the simple definition of probability?A probability is a number that expresses the possibility or likelihood that a specific event will take place. Probabilities can be stated as proportions with a range of 0 to 1, or as percentages with a range of 0% to 100%.
According to the given information:The probability of getting at least 2 fours is the sum of the probabilities of getting exactly 2, 3, 4, or 5 fours:
P(X ≥ 2) = P(X=2) + P(X=3) + P(X=4) + P(X=5)
Using the binomial formula, we can calculate each of these probabilities:
P(X=k) = (n choose k) p^k (1-p)^(n-k)
where (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k items from n distinct items.
P(X=2) = (5 choose 2) (1/6)² (5/6)³ = 0.1608
P(X=3) = (5 choose 3) (1/6)³ (5/6)² = 0.0322
P(X=4) = (5 choose 4) (1/6)⁴ (5/6)¹ = 0.0013
P(X=5) = (5 choose 5) (1/6)⁵ (5/6)⁰ = 0.00003
Therefore,
P(X ≥ 2) = 0.1608 + 0.0322 + 0.0013 + 0.00003 = 0.1943
So the probability, rounded to the nearest thousandth, of getting at least 2 fours in 5 rolls of a fair die is 0.194.
To know more about probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12431044
#SPJ1
find the number of ways of arranging N people in a straight line if two particular people must always be separated
The number of ways to arrange N people with A and B separated is given by expression N! - 2*(N-1)! .
What exactly are expressions?
In mathematics, an expression is a combination of numbers, variables, operators, and functions that are grouped together in a meaningful way. Expressions can be as simple as a single number or variable, or they can be complex and include many different elements. They are used to represent mathematical relationships and operations, and can be evaluated or simplified using mathematical rules and techniques. Examples of expressions include:
3x + 7(2a - b) / (c + 1)sin(x) + cos(y)Now,
Let the two particular people be A and B.
If we place A in a spot, there are N-1 spots left for B to be placed. Once A and B are placed, there are (N-2)! ways to place the remaining people. Therefore, the number of ways to arrange N people with A and B separated is:
(N-1) * (N-2)!
Alternatively, we can find the total number of ways to arrange N people in a line (N!) and subtract the number of ways to arrange them with A and B together.
To find the number of ways to arrange N people with A and B together, we can treat A and B as a single entity, so there are (N-1)! ways to arrange the remaining people with AB together. However, A and B can be arranged in two ways (AB or BA), so we need to multiply (N-1)! by 2.
Therefore, the number of ways to arrange N people with A and B separated is:
N! - 2*(N-1)!
To know more about expressions visit the link
brainly.com/question/13947055
#SPJ1
ten chairs are arranged in a circle. find the number of subsets of this set of chairs that contain at least three adjacent chairs.
Ten chairs are arranged in a circle. The number of subsets of this set of chairs that contain at least three adjacent chairs is 310.
The given that 10 chairs arranged in a circle.
Now we have to find the number of subsets of this set of chairs that contain at least three adjacent chairs.
To solve this, we can use the concept of permutations and combinations. The first step is to consider the number of ways in which three chairs can be selected and arranged in a subset that is adjacent to each other.
This can be done in 10 different ways, as there are 10 chairs in total and we can select any one of them as the starting point.
The next step is to consider the number of ways in which we can add additional chairs to this subset. For example, we can add a fourth chair to the subset in two different ways: either to the left of the first chair or to the right of the third chair.
Similarly, we can add a fifth chair to the subset in four different ways, a sixth chair in six different ways, and so on. Using this logic, we can create the following table:
Length of subset number of ways to select the subset number of ways to add chairs
Total number of subsets31 (adjacent)
= 10 ---43 (adjacent) 10*2
=20---55 (adjacent)10*4
=40---67 (adjacent)10*6
=60---79 (adjacent)10*8
=80---810 (adjacent)10*10
=100---
As we can see from the table, the total number of subsets that contain at least three adjacent chairs is given by:
Total number of subsets = 10 + 20 + 40 + 60 + 80 + 100
= 310
Therefore, the number of subsets of this set of chairs that contain at least three adjacent chairs is 310.
Learn more about the number of subsets of chairs at: https://brainly.com/question/17514113
#SPJ11
Ω = {whole numbers from 2 to 9} A = {even numbers} B = {prime numbers} List the elements in:
a. A’
b. A∩B
c. A∪B
A' is complement of A, A∩B is intersection of A and B, A∪B is union of A and B.
What is complement?In set theory, the complement of a set is the set of all elements in the universal set that are not in the given set. In other words, it is the set of all elements in the universal set that are outside of the given set.
According to question:Ω = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} (whole numbers from 2 to 9)
A = {4, 6, 8} (even numbers from Ω)
B = {2, 3, 5, 7} (prime numbers from Ω)
a. A' (complement of A, i.e. elements in Ω that are not in A)
A' = {2, 3, 5, 7, 9} (odd numbers and 9 are not in A)
b. A∩B (intersection of A and B, i.e. components found in both A and B)
A∩B = {2} (the only even prime number is 2)
c. A∪B (union of A and B, i.e. elements that can be found in A, B, or both)
A∪B = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} (all the even numbers and prime numbers from Ω).
To know more about complement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29775107
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
ASAP
Ω = {whole numbers from 2 to 9} A = {even numbers} B = {prime numbers} List the elements in:
a. A’
b. A∩B
c. A∪B
question 1(multiple choice worth 3 points) (05.05 lc) according to the chart, from 1986-1996, unintentional drug overdose deaths per 100,000 population began to rise. the numbers for each year are, roughly, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3. what is the mean of these statistics? 24 2.18 24.18 2
The mean of the unintentional drug overdose deaths per 100,000 population from 1986-1996 is 2.18. (option 2).
To find the mean of a set of numbers, we add up all the numbers in the set and then divide by the total number of items in the set. In this case, we have the following numbers: 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, and we want to find the mean.
To do so, we first add up all the numbers:
2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 21
Then we divide by the total number of items in the set, which is 10:
21 / 10 = 2.1
Therefore, the mean of the unintentional drug overdose deaths per 100,000 population from 1986-1996 is 2.18.
Learn more about Statistics:
https://brainly.com/question/15525560
#SPJ4
Ronaldo's family drove four and 6/10 killer meters from their house to get to the gas station they drove 2 and 30/100 km from the gas station to the store which expression can be used to determine the number of kilograms Ronaldo's family drove to get all together
Ronaldo's family drove a total of 6.90 kilometres to get from their house to the store.
What expression used to determine number of kilograms?To determine the total distance Ronaldo's family drove, we need to add the distance from their house to the gas station and the distance from the gas station to the store. We can write this as:
[tex]4 6/10 km + 2 30/100 km[/tex]
To add these two distances, we need to find a common denominator for the fractions. The smallest common denominator for 10 and 100 is 100, so we can convert the first distance to an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 100:
[tex]4 6/10 km = 4 60/100 km = 4.60 km[/tex]
Then we can add the two distances:
[tex]4.60 km + 2.30 km = 6.90 km[/tex]
Therefore, Ronaldo's family drove a total of 6.90 kilometres to get from their house to the store.
Learn more about expression here:
https://brainly.com/question/14083225
#SPJ9
The following graph represents a function.
-8-6-4
39
8
Domain: [Select]
6
P
P
-2-
-4
-6
-8
2019 StrongMind
What are the domain and range of the function?
The domain of the function is: Domain = {-8, -6, -4, -2, 1, 2} and range of the function is :- Range = {-8, -6, -4, -2, 0}.
Define function?A function is a rule that maps each element in one set, called the domain, to a unique element in another set, called the range.
It is a relation between two sets where each input in the domain corresponds to a unique output in the range.
Functions are often represented by equations, graphs, or tables, and they are used to model real-world phenomena and solve mathematical problems in various fields such as science, engineering, economics, and more.
The domain of the function is the set of all possible input values, which in this case are the x-coordinates of the given points on the graph. So, the domain is:
Domain = {-8, -6, -4, -2, 1, 2}
The range of the function is the set of all possible output values, which in this case are the y-coordinates of the given points on the graph. So, the range is:
Range = {-8, -6, -4, -2, 0}
To know more about coordinates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16634867
#SPJ1
Person 1 has X amount of shoes. Person 2 has two or more than three times Person 1's amount. Write an expression for total amount for both people.Person 1 has X amount of shoes. Person 2 has two or more than three times Person 1's amount. Write an expression for total amount for both people.
The expression for the total amount of shoes for both people is 4X + 2.
What is another word for total cost?As a result, total cost is the sum of fixed and variable costs, or TC = FC + VC = Kr+Lw.
Say Person 1 owns X pairs of shoes. So, Person 2 has two to three times as much as Person 1. This can be said as follows:
Person 2 possesses at least two more than three times Person 1's amount, so Person 2's amount is equal to 3X + 2.
By simply adding Person 1's and Person 2's shoe counts, we can determine the total number of shoes for both individuals, which results in:
Total equals the sum of the amounts given by Persons 1 and 2.
When we replace the value of Person 2's contribution, we obtain:
Amount total = X + (3X + 2)
If we simplify, we get:
Total = 4X plus 2
Hence, 4X + 2 is the total number of shoes for both individuals.
To know more about Expression visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28170201
#SPJ1
select a correct multiple regression equation that can be used to analyze the data for a two-factorial design with two levels for factor and three levels for factor . define all variables.
A multiple regression equation that can be used to analyze the data for a two-factorial design with two levels for factor A and three levels for factor B can be written as:
Y = b0 + b1A + b2B + b3AB + e
where Y is the dependent variable, A is the independent variable for factor A, B is the independent variable for factor B, A*B is the interaction between A and B, and e is the error term.
The variables can be defined as follows:
Y: The dependent variable that is being measured in the study.
A: The independent variable representing factor A, which has two levels (A1 and A2).
B: The independent variable representing factor B, which has three levels (B1, B2, and B3).
A*B: The interaction term between factor A and factor B.
e: The error term that captures the variability in the dependent variable that is not explained by the independent variables.
This equation allows us to examine the main effects of both factors (A and B) as well as their interaction (A*B) on the dependent variable Y in a two-factorial design.
To know more about multiple regression refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3737733#
#SPJ11
if the area of a circle is less than $60\pi$ square inches, what is the greatest possible integer value in inches of the radius of the circle?
The greatest possible integer value of the radius of the circle is 7 inches.
The area of a circle is given by the equation[tex]$A = \pi r^2$[/tex]. We know that the area is less than [tex]$60\pi$[/tex] square inches, so the equation can be written as [tex]$60\pi > \pi r^2$[/tex]. We can solve for the radius by dividing both sides by [tex]$\pi$[/tex], which gives us [tex]$60 > r^2$[/tex]. Taking the square root of both sides gives us [tex]$r < \sqrt{60}$[/tex], which is approximately 7.74 inches. Therefore, the greatest possible integer value of the radius of the circle is 7 inches.
To explain this further, we can start with the equation for the area of a circle, which is[tex]$A = \pi r^2$[/tex]. Since the area is less than [tex]$60\pi$[/tex]square inches, this equation can be rewritten as[tex]$60\pi > \pi r^2$[/tex]. We can then divide both sides by [tex]$\pi$[/tex] to get [tex]$60 > r^2$[/tex]. Taking the square root of both sides gives us [tex]$r < \sqrt{60}$[/tex]. This result can then be rounded down to the nearest integer, which is 7. Therefore, the greatest possible integer value of the radius of the circle is 7 inches.
To know more about integer value refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29261712
#SPJ11
