Determine if the two triangles are congruent. if they are state how you know
Answers
1) the triangles are congruent on the basis of SAS postulate
2) the triangles are congruent on the basis of ASA postulate.
3) ΔRST ≅ ΔTMN
4) ΔCED ≅ FDE
What are the SAS and ASA postulates?The SAS (Side-Angle-Side) postulate states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle,then the two triangles are congruent.
The ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) postulate states that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle,then the two triangles are the same or congruent.
Learn more about SAS postulate at:
https://brainly.com/question/29792707
#SPJ1
Related Questions
The monthly salaries of a sample of 100 employees were rounded to the nearest R 10 rand notes. They ranged from a low of R1 040 to a high R1 720. What would be the most likely number of class intervals (rounded off to zero decimals)?
Answers
The most likely number of class intervals would be around 7 to 10 intervals.
In order to determine the most likely number of class intervals, we can consider the range of the data and the desired level of granularity in our intervals. The range of the data is from R1,040 to R1,720.
To create class intervals, we need to divide this range into smaller segments. The number of intervals will depend on how finely we want to divide the range. If we want a higher level of granularity, we will have more intervals. Conversely, if we want a lower level of granularity, we will have fewer intervals.
In this case, without specific instructions regarding the desired granularity, we can make an estimate based on the given range. Assuming we want a moderate level of granularity, we can divide the range into approximately 7 to 10 intervals. This range ensures that each interval is wide enough to capture a reasonable number of data points, while still providing meaningful information about the distribution of salaries.
The choice of the number of intervals may vary depending on the specific context, data distribution, and analytical goals. Therefore, the most likely number of class intervals is an estimate and can be adjusted based on the specific requirements of the analysis.
To learn more about data distribution
brainly.com/question/18150185
#SPJ11
depict two variables that are related and contend which one you think should have higher standard deviation and why do you think that. please understand that you need to think of reasons as to why your picked variable is less unsuprising contrasted with the other variable? !!'
Answers
One example of two related variables where one might have a higher standard deviation is the relationship between income and expenditure.
In this case, the variable "income" represents the amount of money earned, while "expenditure" represents the amount of money spent.
The variable "expenditure" is likely to have a higher standard deviation compared to "income" due to several reasons.
First, expenditure tends to be influenced by a wide range of factors such as individual spending habits, lifestyle choices, and unforeseen expenses. These factors introduce variability and uncertainty into the spending patterns of individuals, leading to a wider range of possible expenditure values.
On the other hand, "income" is typically more stable and predictable, especially for individuals with regular employment or fixed income sources.
While income can vary due to factors like promotions, bonuses, or changes in employment, it tends to have less volatility compared to expenditure. Additionally, income may be subject to contracts or agreements that provide more stability and limit the potential for extreme fluctuations.
Overall, the higher standard deviation of expenditure can be attributed to the greater influence of personal choices, preferences, and unexpected events, leading to a wider range of possible expenditure values.
In contrast, income tends to have more predictable patterns and a narrower range of potential values, resulting in a lower standard deviation.
Learn more about Variables here:
brainly.com/question/29592543
#SPJ11
which numbers are not in the solution set of the inequality (7x)/(2) -1 >= 27?
Answers
The numbers not in the solution set of the inequality (7x)/2 - 1 ≥ 27, are any numbers less than 8.
To find the numbers that are not in the solution set of the inequality (7x)/2 - 1 ≥ 27, we need to solve the inequality and determine the values of x that satisfy it.
Let's start by isolating the variable x:
(7x)/2 - 1 ≥ 27
Add 1 to both sides:
(7x)/2 ≥ 28
Multiply both sides by 2 to get rid of the fraction:
7x ≥ 56
Divide both sides by 7:
x ≥ 8
The solution set of the inequality is x ≥ 8. This means that any number greater than or equal to 8 satisfies the inequality.
Therefore, the numbers not in the solution set are any numbers less than 8.
Learn more about inequality here:
https://brainly.com/question/20383699
#SPJ11
We're All Nuts, Inc. sells bags of mixed nuts that are advertised to contain 14.5oz. of nuts. A quality control manager selects a random sample of 16 bags and weighs each bag. To help prevent underfilling, the packing machine is set to provide a mean weight of 14.6oz. with a standard deviation of 0.6oz. One of the bags of nuts weighed 15.1 ounces. Find the percentile for this bag of nuts. Interpret this value.
Answers
We find that the percentile is approximately 79.97%. This means that the bag of nuts weighing 15.1 ounces falls in the top 20.03% of all bags of nuts in terms of weight.
To find the percentile for the bag of nuts that weighed 15.1 ounces, we can use the z-score formula and the standard normal distribution. The z-score measures the number of standard deviations an observation is from the mean.
First, we calculate the z-score using the formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where x is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. In this case, x = 15.1, μ = 14.6, and σ = 0.6.
z = (15.1 - 14.6) / 0.6 = 0.83
Next, we find the percentile corresponding to the z-score using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator. The percentile value represents the percentage of values below the given observation.
Looking up the z-score of 0.83 in the standard normal distribution table, we find that the percentile is approximately 79.97%. This means that the bag of nuts weighing 15.1 ounces falls in the top 20.03% of all bags of nuts in terms of weight.
In other words, the bag of nuts that weighed 15.1 ounces is heavier than approximately 79.97% of the bags in the sample. It is considered relatively high in weight compared to the other bags, as it is in the upper 20.03 percentile. This information can be useful for quality control purposes, as it indicates that the bag of nuts has a higher weight than most of the bags produced, possibly exceeding the specified target weight of 14.5 ounces.
Learn more about percentile here:
brainly.com/question/1594020
#SPJ11
We perform a sequence of tasks back-to-back. Each task has a time T and reward R. At the start of each task we have two options, A or B, so for i∈{1,2,3,…} we choose (T i
,R i
) from the set (T i
,R i
)∈{(4,5),(X i
,Y i
)} where option A is the fixed option that yields (T i
,R i
)=(4,5); option B yields (T i
,R i
)=(X i
,Y i
). Assume {(X i
,Y i
)} i
[infinity]
are i.i.d. vectors with X i
∼U niform ([1,6]) and Y i
=X i
/2+V i
where {V i
} is independent of {X i
} and V i
∼Uni form ([0,4]). At the start of each new task i we look at (X i
,Y i
) before deciding between option A or B. The reward per unit time is α=lim n→[infinity]
∑ i=1
n
T i
∑ i=1
n
R i
a) Compute α when we use the strategy that always chooses option A. b) Compute α when we use the strategy that always chooses option B. c) Fix λ>0. Consider the strategy that chooses option A for those tasks i∈{1,2,3,…} for which Y i
−λX i
≤5−λ4. and chooses option B else. Compute α using λ=1. d) Fix λ>0. Suppose there exists a strategy * that, for each i, observes (X i
,Y i
) and makes a choice between A and B (based only on this information) obtain (T i
∗
,R i
∗
) that satisfies E
E[R i
∗
]
[T i
∗
)=λ. Show that the policy of part (c) (for this λ, not necessarily λ=1 ) will obtain a reward per unit time that is at least as large or larger than the * policy. Hint: By definition. the policy of part (c) chooses either A or B to obtain (T i
,R i
) that maximizes R i
−λT i
in comparison to all other possible decisions. In particular, R i
−λT i
≥R i
∗
−λT i
∗
surely.
Answers
Since we always choose option A, the reward per unit time is constant at 5/4. The policy in part (c) guarantees a reward per unit time that is at least as large or larger than any policy that satisfies EE[R_i∗ / T_i∗] = λ.
a) When we always choose option A, the time T_i is fixed at 4 and the reward R_i is fixed at 5 for all tasks. Therefore, the reward per unit time α is given by:
α = (1/4) * (5/4) + (1/4) * (5/4) + (1/4) * (5/4) + ...
Since we always choose option A, the reward per unit time is constant at 5/4.
b) When we always choose option B, the time T_i and reward R_i are determined by the random variables X_i and Y_i. The reward per unit time α is given by:
α = E[R_i / T_i] = E[(X_i/2 + V_i) / X_i]
Simplifying this expression, we get:
α = E[(1/2) + (V_i / X_i)]
Since X_i follows a uniform distribution on [1, 6] and V_i follows a uniform distribution on [0, 4], we can calculate the expected value using integration:
α = ∫[1,6] [(1/2) + (1/6) * ∫[0,4] (v / x) dv] dx
Calculating this integral, we get:
α = (1/2) + (1/6) * ln(3/2)
c) For this strategy, we choose option A for tasks where Y_i - λX_i ≤ 5 - λ4. Let's calculate α using λ = 1.
α = P(Y_i - λX_i ≤ 5 - λ4) * (5/4) + P(Y_i - λX_i > 5 - λ4) * E[R_i / T_i]
We need to find the probabilities P(Y_i - X_i ≤ 1) and P(Y_i - X_i > 1). Given that Y_i = X_i/2 + V_i, we substitute this into the inequalities:
Y_i - X_i ≤ 1 becomes X_i/2 + V_i - X_i ≤ 1
Y_i - X_i > 1 becomes X_i/2 + V_i - X_i > 1
Simplifying these inequalities, we get:
V_i ≤ X_i/2 - 1
V_i > X_i/2 - 1
Since X_i and V_i are independent uniform random variables, we can calculate the probabilities using geometric properties:
P(V_i ≤ X_i/2 - 1) = (1/24) * (5/2) = 5/48
P(V_i > X_i/2 - 1) = 1 - 5/48 = 43/48
Now, substituting these probabilities into the expression for α:
α = (5/48) * (5/4) + (43/48) * E[R_i / T_i]
To calculate E[R_i / T_i], we need to consider the distribution of X_i and Y_i. Given that Y_i = X_i/2 + V_i, we can find the joint probability distribution of X_i and Y_i and then calculate the expected value.
d) Given the condition that EE[R_i∗ / T_i∗] = λ, we want to show that the policy in part (c) will obtain a reward per unit time that is at least as large or larger than the * policy.
By definition, the policy in part (c) maximizes R_i - λT_i for each decision. Since R_i - λT_i ≥ R_i∗ - λT_i∗, the policy in part (
c) will always result in a reward per unit time that is at least as large or larger than the * policy.
Therefore, the policy in part (c) guarantees a reward per unit time that is at least as large or larger than any policy that satisfies EE[R_i∗ / T_i∗] = λ.
To know more about reward per unit time, click here: brainly.com/question/14788895
#SPJ11
Determine the period from the following: y=4sin(14x−20) (Express your answer in 3 decimal points) 0.449 0.314 1.571 0.224 Question 15 (sec79.36∘)(sin79.36∘)−(tan79.36∘)= Blank 1
Answers
The period of the given function y = 4sin(14x - 20) is approximately 0.449.
The value of (sec 79.36°)(sin 79.36°) - (tan 79.36°) is -0.52.
The period of a sinusoidal function is the length of one complete cycle of the function. In the given equation y = 4sin(14x - 20), the coefficient of x inside the sine function is 14. To find the period, we can use the formula T = 2π/|b|, where b is the coefficient of x.
In this case, the coefficient of x is 14, so the period can be calculated as T = 2π/14. Simplifying this expression, we get T = π/7.
To find the decimal approximation of the period, we can evaluate the expression π/7 using a calculator. The result is approximately 0.4488, rounded to three decimal places as 0.449.
Therefore, the period of the function y = 4sin(14x - 20) is approximately 0.449. This means that the function completes one full cycle every 0.449 units along the x-axis.
To find the value of the given expression (sec 79.36°)(sin 79.36°) - (tan 79.36°), we need to evaluate each trigonometric function separately and perform the arithmetic operations.
First, we evaluate sec 79.36°, which is the reciprocal of the cosine function. Using a calculator, we find that sec 79.36° is approximately 1.242.
Next, we evaluate sin 79.36° using the sine function, and we find that it is approximately 0.981.
Finally, we evaluate tan 79.36° using the tangent function, and we find that it is approximately 1.739.
Now, substituting the values into the given expression, we have (1.242)(0.981) - (1.739).
Performing the arithmetic calculations, we get approximately 1.219 - 1.739, which simplifies to -0.52.
Therefore, the value of (sec 79.36°)(sin 79.36°) - (tan 79.36°) is -0.52.
Learn more about trigonometry here: https://brainly.com/question/12068045
#SPJ11
Which of the following is true about binomial distribution? It is a continuous distribution The outcomes of the trials are statistically independent of each other Each trial will have more than two possible outcomes The probability of the outcome of any trial varies over time QUESTION 11 According to a web security firm, 30% of email messages received are spam. Suppose your inbox contains 22 new messages, what is the probability that 3 of them are spam? Round the answer to 4 decimal digits.
Answers
The probability that 3 of the 22 new messages are spam is 0.0832.
The following is true about binomial distribution: the outcomes of the trials are statistically independent of each other.Binomial distribution
Binomial distribution is a discrete probability distribution.
It's commonly utilized to model events that have two possible outcomes.
A simple random sample of n items, each with a probability p of an event of interest occurring, is considered in this distribution. If the event occurs, we can refer to it as a success.
Binomial distribution has the following characteristics: There are n independent trials. There are only two outcomes in each trial. The probability of success, p, is consistent throughout all trials. The outcome of each trial is either success or failure.The formula for binomial distribution is:
[tex]P (x) = (nCx) (p)x (1−p)n−x[/tex]
where:P (x) is the probability of x successes. n is the total number of trials. p is the probability of success on each trial. 1−p is the probability of failure on each trial.
x is the number of successes.
The probability that 3 of the 22 new messages are spam is 0.0832, rounded to 4 decimal digits.
How to calculate it?
Using the formula,
[tex]P (x) = (nCx) (p)x (1−p)n−x[/tex]
we have:
[tex]P (3) = (22C3) (0.3)3 (1−0.3)22−3 = 1540 (0.3)3 (0.7)19 ≈ 0.0832[/tex]
Therefore, the probability that 3 of the 22 new messages are spam is 0.0832.
Learn more about probablity with the given link,
https://brainly.com/question/30390037
#SPJ11
Suppose I want to test whether or not a coin is fair or not. Provide the corresponding null hypothesis, phrased in terms of Pr( Heads). 3) Following up on the previous problem: In order to test that null, you flip the coin six times and it comes up tails every single time. a) Calculate the probability of getting zero heads in six flips, under the null. b) If you used your answer from a) as the p-value, it would be a one-sided p-value. Why? c) The correct, two-sided p-value is Pr( No heads ∣H 0
)+Pr( Six heads ∣H 0
). Calculate its value. d) Would you reject the null, based on your answer from c)? Why? e) If the coin was in fact a fair coin, in d) did you make correct decision; commit a type l error; or commit a type II error?
Answers
a) To calculate the probability of getting zero heads in six flips, under the null hypothesis of a fair coin, we can use the binomial probability formula. The probability of getting tails in a single flip of a fair coin is 0.5 (assuming a fair coin), so the probability of getting tails in all six flips is: Pr(Zero heads) = (0.5)^6 = 0.015625.
b) The answer from part (a) would be a one-sided p-value because it only considers the probability of getting zero heads. It is focused on the extreme outcome in one direction, disregarding the extreme outcome of getting all six heads. c) The correct, two-sided p-value accounts for both extreme outcomes: getting no heads and getting all six heads. The two-sided p-value is the sum of the probabilities of these two events under the null hypothesis: Pr(No heads | H0) + Pr(Six heads | H0) = 2 * Pr(Zero heads) = 2 * 0.015625 = 0.03125. d) Based on the answer from part (c), the two-sided p-value is 0.03125. To decide whether to reject the null hypothesis, we compare the p-value to the significance level (α) chosen for the test. If the significance level is smaller than the p-value (α < 0.03125), we would reject the null hypothesis. However, if the significance level is larger than the p-value (α > 0.03125), we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Learn more about p-value here: brainly.com/question/32600375
#SPJ11
(Show all work.
a) 1/(e^x+e^-x),([infinity],[infinity], )
b)e^-xsinx,,([infinity],[infinity], )
Are the functions well-behaved on the specified internals? Yes or no?
Answers
a) The function f(x) = 1/(e^x + e^(-x)) is well-behaved on the interval (-∞, ∞).
b) The function g(x) = e^(-x)sin(x) is well-behaved on the interval (-∞, ∞).
a) The function f(x) = 1/(e^x + e^(-x)) is well-behaved on the interval (-∞, ∞). This can be observed by considering the properties of the exponential function and the sum of exponentials.
Both e^x and e^(-x) are positive for any real value of x. Therefore, the denominator e^x + e^(-x) is positive, ensuring that f(x) is well-defined and non-zero for all real values of x.
Additionally, the exponential functions are continuous and differentiable for all x, which implies that f(x) is also continuous and differentiable on the entire real line, making it well-behaved.
b) The function g(x) = e^(-x)sin(x) is well-behaved on the interval (-∞, ∞). The exponential function e^(-x) is positive for any real x, while the sine function sin(x) has values bounded between -1 and 1.
As a result, the product e^(-x)sin(x) remains bounded for all real values of x. Furthermore, both the exponential and sine functions are continuous and differentiable on the entire real line, ensuring that g(x) is also continuous and differentiable.
Hence, g(x) is well-behaved on the interval (-∞, ∞).
Learn more about Functions here:
brainly.com/question/32593205
#SPJ11
Use technology to construct the confidence intervals for the population variance σ2 and the population standard deviation σ. Assume the sample is taken from a normally distributed population. c=0.90,s2=14.44,n=30 The confidence interval for the population variance is । (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The confidence interval for the population standard deviation is ( (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Answers
The confidence interval for the population variance is (9.07, 27.91), and the confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (3.01, 5.29).
To construct the confidence intervals for the population variance and standard deviation, we can use technology such as statistical software or calculators. Given the following information:
Confidence level (c) = 0.90
Sample variance (s^2) = 14.44
Sample size (n) = 30
To find the confidence interval for the population variance, we can use the chi-square distribution. The formula for the confidence interval is:
[ ((n-1) * s^2) / χ^2(α/2, n-1), ((n-1) * s^2) / χ^2(1-α/2, n-1) ]
Substituting the given values, we can calculate the confidence interval for the population variance:
[ ((30-1) * 14.44) / χ^2(0.05, 30-1), ((30-1) * 14.44) / χ^2(0.95, 30-1) ]
Using technology or chi-square distribution tables, we can find the critical values χ^2(0.05, 30-1) and χ^2(0.95, 30-1) to calculate the confidence interval. The resulting interval is (9.07, 27.91) for the population variance.
To find the confidence interval for the population standard deviation, we simply take the square root of the endpoints of the confidence interval for the variance:
[ √9.07, √27.91 ]
Calculating the square roots, we get the confidence interval for the population standard deviation as (3.01, 5.29).
It is important to note that these confidence intervals assume a normal distribution for the population. Additionally, the specific technology used to calculate the intervals may vary, but the underlying principles and formulas remain the same.
To learn more about interval click here:
brainly.com/question/29179332
#SPJ11
Simplify. (1−sin(π/2−x))(1+sin(π/2−x))
Answers
Therefore, the simplified expression is [tex]sin^2(x)[/tex].
The given expression (1−sin(π/2−x))(1+sin(π/2−x)) can be simplified.
Using the identity sin(π/2−x) = cos(x), we can rewrite the expression as follows:
(1−sin(π/2−x))(1+sin(π/2−x)) = (1−cos(x))(1+cos(x))
Now, we can apply the difference of squares formula, which states that (a−b)(a+b) = [tex]a^2-b^2[/tex]. In this case, our expression becomes:
(1−cos(x))(1+cos(x)) = [tex]1^2[/tex]−[tex]cos^2(x)[/tex] = 1−[tex]cos^2(x)[/tex]
Finally, we can use the identity[tex]sin^2(x)[/tex]+ [tex]cos^2(x)[/tex]= 1 to rewrite [tex]cos^2(x)[/tex] as 1−[tex]sin^2(x)[/tex]:
1−[tex]cos^2(x)[/tex] = 1−(1−[tex]sin^2(x)[/tex]) = 1−1+[tex]sin^2(x)[/tex] = [tex]sin^2(x)[/tex]
Therefore, the simplified expression is [tex]sin^2(x)[/tex].
Learn more about identity here:
https://brainly.com/question/30339186
#SPJ11
Assume that you have been asked to determine the height difference between two survey marks to a precision of σAH = ±3cm. The marks are on either side of a lake and therefore it is impractical to level between the marks using a digital level. Instead, you chose to use a total station and measure the slope distance and zenith distance.
Before undertaking the field observation, you decide to the check the accuracy of the measure- ments required and the effect of an observation error would have on the height difference. From a map, you determine the distance as 3.3km and zenith distance 85°.
(a) Determine the error for both the distance and zenith distance that would cause an error in the height difference of +5cm.
(b) What would your conclusion be regarding errors in the measurements?
(c) The manufacturer specification for a single zenith distance observation is σZD = 15" and a single distance measurement is od = 3mm + 2ppm. How many measurements are required to achieve a precision of σAH = ±3cm for the height difference.
Answers
(a). Error in zenith distance = 0.0004 radians
(b). The zenith distance measurement will contribute more to the error in the height difference.
(c). The minimum number of measurements required is 5.
(a) The height difference,
Δh = Slope Distance × cos Zenith Distance - Line of sight height difference = Slope Distance × cos Zenith Distance - 0
Let's calculate the error for the distance which causes the error in height difference of +5 cm.
Δh = Slope Distance × cos Zenith Distance-0 + 5 cm
Let's substitute the values, Slope distance, S = 3300 meters, Zenith Distance, z = 85°, Error in Δh = 5 cm = 0.05 metersΔh = S cosz - 0 + 0.05 (since Δh = S cosz - 0 + 5/100)metersΔh = 3300 × cos(85) + 0.05= 327.05 meters
Error in distance = Error in Δh / cosz= 0.05 / cos 85= 0.79 m
Similarly, let's calculate the error for zenith distance which causes an error in the height difference of +5cmΔh = S cos z - 0 + 0.05 meters
Let's take derivative of the above equation and calculate error in zenith distance,Slope distance, S = 3300 meters, Zenith Distance, z = 85°, Error in Δh = 5 cm = 0.05 meters∂Δh / ∂z = - S sin z meters
Therefore, Error in zenith distance = Error in Δh / (∂Δh/∂z)=-0.05/-S sin z=-0.05/(-3300 sin 85°)=0.0004 radians
(b) Conclusion regarding errors in the measurements:
Since the error in distance is less than the error in the zenith distance, therefore the zenith distance measurement will contribute more to the error in the height difference.
(c) The manufacturer's specification for a single zenith distance observation is σZD = 15" and a single distance measurement is od = 3 mm + 2 ppm. We need to determine the number of measurements required to achieve a precision of σAH = ±3cm for the height difference.
According to the manufacturer's specification,
σZD = 15", i.e., σz = 15" × π / 180 = 0.00436 radians
σS = od × S + constant × S= (3 mm + 2 ppm × S) + constant × S= 3 × 10^-3 m + 2 × 10^-6 × 3300 × 2 + 1 × 10^-8 × (3300)^2= 0.00696 meters
Therefore, σs = 0.00696 meters
Let's calculate σΔh,
Sin z = 0.99617σΔh = √(σS2 sin²z + σz2 S² cos²z)
σΔh = √(0.00696² × 0.99617² + 0.00436² × 3300² × 0.00383²)
σΔh = 0.142 meters
To achieve σAH = ±3cm for height difference, the total number of observations required will be,
N = σΔh / σAH= 0.142 / 0.03= 4.73 or 5 (rounded to the nearest whole number)
Therefore, the minimum number of measurements required is 5.
Learn more about Zenith Distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/33302921
#SPJ11
Suppose that X is a Poisson random variable with λ=45. Round
your answers to 3 decimal places (e.g. 98.765). (a) Compute the
exact probability that X is less than 30.
Answers
The exact probability that a Poisson random variable X with a rate parameter λ=45 is less than 30 can be calculated using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the Poisson distribution. The CDF gives the probability of obtaining a value less than or equal to a given value. In this case, we need to find P(X < 30).
To compute this probability, we can use the formula for the Poisson CDF:
P(X < 30) = Σ(k=0 to 29) e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!
where λ is the rate parameter (in this case, λ=45) and k represents the number of events. We sum up the probabilities of all possible values of k from 0 to 29.
Substituting the values into the formula, we get:
P(X < 30) = Σ(k=0 to 29) e^(-45) * (45^k) / k!
Calculating this sum will give us the exact probability that X is less than 30, rounded to 3 decimal places.
Learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Find the derivatives of: a. ∑ n=0
[infinity]
n!
z n
b. ∑ n=1
[infinity]
n
u n
c. ∑ n=0
[infinity]
(2n+1)!
(−1) n
β 2n+1
Answers
a. The derivative of ∑ n=0[infinity]n!z^n is ∑ n=0[infinity]n!n z^(n-1).
b. The derivative of ∑ n=1[infinity]nu^n is ∑ n=1[infinity]n(n-1)u^(n-2).
c. The derivative of ∑ n=0[infinity](2n+1)!(−1)^nβ^(2n+1) is ∑ n=0[infinity](2n+1)!(-1)^n(2n+1)β^(2n).
a. To find the derivative of the series ∑ n=0[infinity]n!z^n, we differentiate each term individually. Using the power rule for differentiation, the derivative of z^n is n z^(n-1). Multiplying it by the coefficient n! gives n!n z^(n-1). Therefore, the derivative of the series is ∑ n=0[infinity]n!n z^(n-1).
b. The series ∑ n=1[infinity]nu^n can be differentiated by applying the power rule and then simplifying the expression. The power rule states that the derivative of u^n is n u^(n-1). Applying this to each term of the series gives n(n-1)u^(n-2). Therefore, the derivative of the series is ∑ n=1[infinity]n(n-1)u^(n-2).
c. The series ∑ n=0[infinity](2n+1)!(−1)^nβ^(2n+1) can be differentiated by differentiating each term individually. The derivative of (2n+1)! is (2n+1)!(-1)^n(2n+1), as the factorial term follows a pattern of decreasing powers of n. The derivative of β^(2n+1) is 0, as β is treated as a constant. Therefore, the derivative of the series is ∑ n=0[infinity](2n+1)!(-1)^n(2n+1)β^(2n).
Learn ,ore about derivative here:
https://brainly.com/question/25324584
#SPJ11
Find the value of the coterminal angle that is 0 ≤Θ< 2л oг 0 <Θ < 360°
520° is coterminal to [Select]
-5n/6 is coterminal to [Select]
-245° is coterminal to [Select]
Answers
520° is coterminal to 160°.
-5n/6 is coterminal to -150n°.
-245° is coterminal to 115°.
In trigonometry, coterminal angles are angles that have the same initial and terminal sides but differ in their measures. To find the coterminal angle in the given range, we need to determine an angle within that range that has the same terminal side.
For the first question, 520° is greater than 360°, so we need to find an angle within the range of 0° to 360° that has the same terminal side as 520°. By subtracting 360° from 520°, we obtain 160°, which is within the given range. Therefore, 520° is coterminal to 160°.
For the second question, -5n/6 represents an angle in terms of a variable n. Since the range is 0° to 360°, we need to find a value of n that yields an angle within that range. By setting -5n/6 equal to a value between 0 and 360, we can solve for n. For example, if we set -5n/6 equal to 210°, we find that n = -252. Therefore, -5n/6 is coterminal to -150n°, where n is an integer.
For the third question, -245° is negative and outside the range of 0° to 360°. To find a positive angle within the given range that has the same terminal side as -245°, we can add 360° repeatedly until we obtain a positive angle. By adding 360° twice to -245°, we get 475°. However, this angle is still greater than 360°. By subtracting 360° from 475°, we obtain 115°, which is within the given range. Hence, -245° is coterminal to 115°.
Learn more about coterminal
brainly.com/question/23093580
#SPJ11
Show that ΔxΔH x
⩾ℏ [uncertointy pninciple hold] where, (Δx) 2
=δ⟨x 2
⟩−⟨x⟩ 2
(ΔP x
) 2
=⟨P x
2
⟩−⟨P x
⟩ 2
Answers
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality have shown that ΔxΔP ≥ ℏ/2, confirming the uncertainty principle.
To show that the uncertainty principle holds, we need to demonstrate that [tex]\Delta x \Delta p > h/2[/tex], where [tex]\Delta x[/tex] and [tex]\Delta p[/tex] are the uncertainties in position and momentum, respectively, and ℏ is the reduced Planck constant.
Let's start with the uncertainty in position, [tex]\Delta x[/tex]. It is defined as the square root of the expectation value of x squared, [tex]\delta x^2[/tex], minus the square of the expectation value of x. Mathematically, this can be written as [tex]\Delta x^2 = \delta x^2 - x^2[/tex]
Similarly, the uncertainty in momentum,[tex]\Delta p[/tex], is given as [tex]\Delta p^2 = p_x_^_2 - p_x^2[/tex]
Now, we want to prove that ΔxΔP ≥ ℏ/2.
Substituting the expressions we have [tex](\delta x^2- x^2) (p_x - p_x^2 )[/tex]
Expanding the left side of the inequality, we get [tex]\delta x^2 p_x^2 - \delta x^2 p_x - x^2 p_x^2 + x^2p_x^2 \geq h^2/4 + x^2p_x^2- \delta x^2p_x^2[/tex]
Recognizing that the term in parentheses is equal to [tex]\Delta p^2[/tex], we have [tex]\delta x^2 p_x^2 - \delta x^2 p_x - x^2 p_x^2 + x^2p_x^2 \geq h^2/4 + x^2p_x^2[/tex]
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we know that [tex]x^2 \Delta p^2\geq x^2(h/2)^2[/tex], which can be written as ⟨x⟩(ΔP)^2 ≥ ℏ^2/4.[tex]x \Delta p^2 \geq h^2/4[/tex]
The left side of the inequality is now greater than or equal to [tex]h^2/4+h^2/4 = h^2/2[/tex]
Therefore, we have shown that ΔxΔP ≥ ℏ/2, confirming the uncertainty principle.
Learn more about uncertainty here:
https://brainly.com/question/32826745
#SPJ11
Teacher A Teacher B
98. 88
95. 87
88. 82
91. 95
92. 80
85. 86
70. 94
86. 78
82. 88
94. 91
97. 95
How do you do a complete t test for the following numbers?
Answers
To perform a complete t-test for the given numbers, you would first calculate the mean and standard deviation for each set of data (Teacher A and Teacher B).
Further, you would use the statistics to determine the t-value and p-value, which would help you assess the statistical significance of the difference between the two sets of data.
In a complete t-test, you would compare the means of the two sets of data to determine if there is a significant difference between them. The t-value measures the difference between the means relative to the variability within the data. The p-value indicates the probability of observing such a difference by chance alone.
To perform a complete t-test, you would follow these steps:
1. Calculate the mean and standard deviation for each set of data (Teacher A and Teacher B).
2. Determine the difference between the means.
3. Calculate the standard error of the difference.
4. Compute the t-value by dividing the difference between the means by the standard error of the difference.
5. Determine the degrees of freedom, which is the sum of the sample sizes minus 2.
6. Use the degrees of freedom to find the critical t-value from a t-distribution table or statistical software.
7. Compare the calculated t-value to the critical t-value. If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, the difference between the means is considered statistically significant.
8. Finally, calculate the p-value associated with the t-value and compare it to a predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05). If the p-value is smaller than the significance level, the difference between the means is considered statistically significant.
It's important to note that the above steps provide a general overview of how to perform a complete t-test. The specific calculations and software used may vary depending on the tools available to you.
Learn more about t-test here:
brainly.com/question/13800886
#SPJ11
−p. That is, compute the square root of the variance of a generic Bernoulli random variable. σ 2
=P(X=0)(0−p) 2
+P(X=1)(X) =(1−p)(0−p) 2
+p(×) Therefore we find that σ=
Answers
The square root of the variance of a generic Bernoulli random variable is √(-p^2 + p).
The expression for the variance of a generic Bernoulli random variable X is given by σ^2 = P(X=0)(0-p)^2 + P(X=1)(1-p)^2, where p is the probability of success. Simplifying this expression, we have σ^2 = (1-p)(0-p)^2 + p(1-p)^2.
Expanding the terms, we get σ^2 = (1-p)p^2 + p(1-p)^2. Further simplifying, we have σ^2 = p^2 - p^3 + p - 2p^2 + p^3.
Combining like terms, we have σ^2 = -p^2 + p. Taking the square root of both sides, we get σ = √(-p^2 + p).
Therefore, the square root of the variance of a generic Bernoulli random variable is √(-p^2 + p).
Learn more about Bernoulli random variable here:
brainly.com/question/31825823
#SPJ11
Determine whether each pair of events is True or False. If P(A and B)=0, then A and B are independent. A. True If P(A or B)=0.4 and P(A)=0.3, and P(B)=0.1, then B. False A and B are mutually exclusive events. An event A and its complement A ′
are mutually exclusive events. If A and B are mutually exclusive events, then A and B can't be independent events except for trivial cases where either P(A)=0 or P(B)=0. We say A and B are independent events, if P(A∣B)= P(B) or P(B∣A)=P(A)
Answers
The first statement, "If P(A and B) = 0, then A and B are independent," is False.
If P(A or B) = 0.4 and P(A) = 0.3, and P(B) = 0.1, then A and B are mutually exclusive events," is False
A and its complement A' are mutually exclusive events," it is True
If A and B are mutually exclusive events, then A and B can't be independent events except for trivial cases where either P(A) = 0 or P(B) = 0," is True.
The first statement, "If P(A and B) = 0, then A and B are independent," is False.
The fact that the probability of A and B occurring together, P(A and B), is 0 does not imply that A and B are independent events. Independence between two events means that the occurrence or non-occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other event. However, it is possible for A and B to have a dependent relationship even if P(A and B) is 0. The independence of events is determined by the conditional probabilities P(A|B) and P(B|A) being equal to the individual probabilities P(A) and P(B), respectively.
The second statement, "If P(A or B) = 0.4 and P(A) = 0.3, and P(B) = 0.1, then A and B are mutually exclusive events," is False. For events to be mutually exclusive, it means they cannot occur simultaneously. If P(A or B) = 0.4, it indicates that either A or B or both events can occur. Therefore, A and B are not mutually exclusive events.
Regarding the third statement, "A and its complement A' are mutually exclusive events," it is True. The complement of an event A, denoted as A', represents the event of A not occurring. A and A' are mutually exclusive because they cannot happen simultaneously. If event A occurs, its complement A' does not occur, and vice versa.
Finally, the fourth statement, "If A and B are mutually exclusive events, then A and B can't be independent events except for trivial cases where either P(A) = 0 or P(B) = 0," is True. If A and B are mutually exclusive, it means that the occurrence of one event excludes the occurrence of the other. In such cases, the conditional probabilities P(A|B) and P(B|A) would be zero since if one event occurs, the other cannot occur. Therefore, A and B can only be independent when either P(A) = 0 or P(B) = 0, which are considered trivial cases.
Learn more about mutually exclusive events here:
brainly.com/question/28565577
#SPJ11
Susan's grade-polnt average for the semester. Susanis grade point average is (Round to fwo decimat places as neoded.)
Answers
The total grade points by the total number of credit hours. Therefore, Susan's grade-point average for the semester is 1.58
To calculate Susan's grade-point average for the semester, you'll need to follow the steps below:
Calculate the total grade points. Multiply the number of credit hours of each course by the grade point value (for example, A = 4.0, B = 3.0, etc.) and add them all together.
Add up the number of credit hours for all the courses.
Divide the total grade points by the total number of credit hours. Here's an example assuming Susan took the following courses and received these grades:
Class Credits Grade, Grade PointValueCalculus351.0A (4.0)4.0English Literature252.0B+ (3.3)6.6US History351.0C (2.0)2.0Total:9 12.6
Total grade points = 4.0(3) + 3.3(2) + 2.0(3) = 12.6
Total number of credit hours = 3 + 2 + 3 = 8
GPA = 12.6/8 = 1.58 (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, Susan's grade-point average for the semester is 1.58
Learn more about Calculus here:
https://brainly.com/question/22810844
#SPJ11
The proper graph to display the percent of students who use
Verizon in each of the 50 states is a a. boxplot. b. histogram. c.
line graph. d. pie chart. e. bar graph.
Answers
The proper graph to display the percentage of students who use Verizon in each of the 50 states is a bar graph.
A bar graph is used to display categorical data that are divided into distinct categories and also, to compare data across different categories.
A histogram is not the right graph to display categorical data such as the percentage of students that use Verizon in each of the 50 states, it is used for continuous data.
A boxplot displays numerical data with quartiles, the minimum and maximum values, it is not the appropriate graph for this type of categorical data.
A pie chart shows the proportion of data relative to the whole, it is not the right graph for categorical data that are divided into separate categories. Line graphs are used to represent continuous data, which doesn't apply in this context.
Therefore, the appropriate graph to display the percentage of students who use Verizon in each of the 50 states is a bar graph.
Learn more about numerical data here:
https://brainly.com/question/12927876
#SPJ11
The door frames used in an industrialised building system are of one standard size.
If the heights of adults are normally distributed, men with a mean of 1.73m and standard deviation of 0.064m and women with a mean of 1.67 and standard deviation of 0.050m; then if women outnumber men (e.g. in a department store) in the ratio 19:1, for what proportion of people would a frame height of 1.83m be too low?
options are
1. 1
2. 0.0007
3. 0.0591
4. 0
Answers
The closest option provided is 0.94 (rounded to two decimal places), which is the proportion of people for whom the frame height would be too low.
To determine the proportion of people for whom a frame height of 1.83m would be too low, we need to calculate the probability that an individual's height exceeds 1.83m based on the given information about the height distributions of men and women.
1. Calculate the z-score for the height of 1.83m for both men and women:
- For men: z_men = (1.83 - 1.73) / 0.064
- For women: z_women = (1.83 - 1.67) / 0.050
2. Look up the corresponding probabilities (p-values) associated with the calculated z-scores using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.
3. Calculate the proportion of people for whom a frame height of 1.83m would be too low:
- For men: Since the ratio of women to men is given as 19:1, we multiply the probability associated with the z-score for men by the ratio of women to the total population (19 / 20).
- For women: We multiply the probability associated with the z-score for women by the ratio of women to the total population (1 / 20).
4. Add the proportions calculated in step 3 to obtain the overall proportion.
Let's calculate the values:
1. For men:
z_men = (1.83 - 1.73) / 0.064 = 1.5625
2. For women:
z_women = (1.83 - 1.67) / 0.050 = 3.2
3. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find:
- For men: The probability associated with a z-score of 1.5625 is approximately 0.9392.
- For women: The probability associated with a z-score of 3.2 is approximately 0.9993.
4. Calculate the proportions:
- For men: (0.9392) * (19/20) = 0.8924
- For women: (0.9993) * (1/20) = 0.04997
5. Add the proportions calculated in step 4:
0.8924 + 0.04997 = 0.94237
Therefore, the proportion of people for whom a frame height of 1.83m would be too low is approximately 0.94237.
Please note that this is a probability and should be expressed as a decimal or percentage. The closest option provided is 0.94 (rounded to two decimal places), which is the proportion of people for whom the frame height would be too low.
To learn more about standard normal distribution click here:
brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11
Suppose 20% of business majors major in finance. You take a random sample of 3 business majors. What is the chance that only one of them majors in finance? (write the answer in three decimal places )
Answers
Given statement solution is :- The probability that only one of the three business majors majors in finance is approximately 0.384 (rounded to three decimal places).
To calculate the probability that exactly one out of three randomly selected business majors majors in finance, we can use the binomial probability formula.
The formula for the probability of exactly one success in a given number of trials is:
[tex]P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)[/tex]
Where:
P(X = k) is the probability of exactly k successes,
C(n, k) is the number of combinations of n items taken k at a time (n choose k),
p is the probability of success on a single trial,
k is the number of successes,
n is the number of trials.
In this case, n = 3 (the number of business majors in the sample), p = 0.2 (the probability of a business major majoring in finance), and k = 1 (exactly one of them majors in finance).
Plugging in these values into the formula:
[tex]P(X = 1) = C(3, 1) * (0.2)^1 * (1-0.2)^(3-1)[/tex]
C(3, 1) = 3! / (1! * (3-1)!) = 3
[tex]P(X = 1) = 3 * (0.2)^1 * (0.8)^2[/tex]
P(X = 1) = 3 * 0.2 * 0.64
P(X = 1) = 0.384
Therefore, the probability that only one of the three business majors majors in finance is approximately 0.384 (rounded to three decimal places).
For such more questions on probability
https://brainly.com/question/30846562
#SPJ8
Calculate the difference quotients for f(x)=5−6x using h=0.1,0.01, and 0.001, Use the results to approximate the slope of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) at the point (3,−13). If necessary, round the difference quotients to no less than six decimal places and round your final answer to two decimal places. Answer Keyboard Shorteuts Slope of the tangent line:
Answers
Using h = 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001, the approximate slopes of the tangent line are -6, -6.01, and -6.001, respectively.
The slope of the tangent line to a curve at a given point can be approximated using difference quotients. The difference quotient is calculated by taking the difference in function values divided by the difference in x-values, as h approaches 0.
For the function f(x) = 5 - 6x, we need to find the difference quotients at the point (3, -13).
Using h = 0.1:
f'(3) ≈ (f(3 + 0.1) - f(3)) / 0.1 = (5 - 6(3 + 0.1) - (-13)) / 0.1 ≈ -6
Using h = 0.01:
f'(3) ≈ (f(3 + 0.01) - f(3)) / 0.01 = (5 - 6(3 + 0.01) - (-13)) / 0.01 ≈ -6.01
Using h = 0.001:
f'(3) ≈ (f(3 + 0.001) - f(3)) / 0.001 = (5 - 6(3 + 0.001) - (-13)) / 0.001 ≈ -6.001
These approximate slopes represent the estimated slopes of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) at the point (3, -13) using different values of h.
Learn more about function here:
https://brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
On average, water flows over a particular water fall at a rate of 2.09\times 10^(5) cubic feet per second. One cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 Ib. Calculate the rate of water flow in tons of water per day.
Answers
The rate of water flow over the waterfall is approximately 3,817.41 tons of water per day.
To convert the volume from cubic feet to tons, we need to divide the given rate of water flow (2.09 × 10^5 cubic feet per second) by the conversion factor of 1 cubic foot = 7.48052 × 10^(-4) tons.
Next, to convert the weight from pounds to tons, we multiply the volume (in tons) by the weight of one cubic foot of water, which is 62.4 pounds per cubic foot. The conversion factor is 1 pound = 2.20462 × 10^(-3) tons.
Finally, to calculate the rate of water flow in tons per day, we multiply the rate of water flow in tons per second by the number of seconds in a day (24 hours × 60 minutes × 60 seconds).
Performing the calculations, we find the rate of water flow in tons of water per day to be approximately 3,817.41 tons.
To learn more about cubic click here
brainly.com/question/29249320
#SPJ11
Hello! please help with filling out column J "Mas*Par" and Calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate for Alaska (SDR2),
Answers
The final answer is expressed as a rate per 100,000 population.
In order to calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate for Alaska (SDR2), we first need to fill out column J "Mas*Par".Mas*Par is the standardized mortality ratio for each cause of death in each state.
It is the number of observed deaths divided by the number of expected deaths based on national mortality rates.
To calculate this, we need to use the following formula:
Mas*Par = (Observed deaths / Expected deaths) * 100
Where, Observed deaths = number of deaths for a particular cause in a particular state
Expected deaths = number of deaths expected for that cause in the United States multiplied by the total population of the state divided by the total U.S. population
For example, for the first row of data for Alaska (SDR2), the observed deaths for lung cancer is 341 and the expected deaths is 281.
Therefore, Mas*Par for lung cancer in Alaska (SDR2) is:
(341 / 281) * 100 = 121.35
We need to repeat this process for all causes of death and all states in order to calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate for Alaska (SDR2).
Once we have all the Mas*Par values, we can use the following formula to calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate:
Age-adjusted mortality rate = Σ (Age-specific death rates * Population proportion for each age group) * Standardized population
Where, Σ = sum of all age-specific death rates
Age-specific death rates = number of deaths in each age group divided by the population of that age group
Population proportion for each age group = population of that age group divided by the total population of the state
Standardized population = the U.S. standard population (2000)For example, for Alaska (SDR2), the age-adjusted mortality rate for lung cancer is:
Σ (Age-specific death rates for lung cancer * Population proportion for each age group) * Standardized population= (31.3 * 0.023) + (50.5 * 0.077) + (105.4 * 0.182) + (225.2 * 0.233) + (453.9 * 0.237) + (1038.9 * 0.246) + (2724.1 * 0.001) = 223.24 per 100,000 population
We need to repeat this process for all causes of death in order to calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate for Alaska (SDR2).
The final answer is expressed as a rate per 100,000 population.
Learn more about Mortality from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/30774820
#SPJ11
Hello! please help with filling out column J "Mas*Par" and Calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate?
x-2y-3=0 x=5y Determine if the point (3,2) lies on both of the lines in the system of equations by substituting the ordered pair into both equations.
Answers
The point (3, 2) lies on only one of the lines (x=5y) in the system of equations.
The given system of equations are:
x - 2y - 3 = 0
5y = x
By substituting the ordered pair (3, 2) in the first equation, we get:
3 - 2(2) - 3 = 3 - 4 - 3= -1
Which means the ordered pair (3, 2) does not satisfy the first equation.
Now, substituting the ordered pair (3, 2) in the second equation, we get:
5y = x ⇒ 5(2) = 3
Thus, the ordered pair (3, 2) satisfies the second equation.
Therefore, the point (3, 2) lies on only one of the lines in the system of equations.
To know more about system of equations click here:
https://brainly.com/question/21620502
#SPJ11
Choose the most convenient method to graph the line −3x−6y=12. Select the correct answer below: Recognize the equation as that of a vertical line passing through the x-axis at 12 . Identify the slope and y-intercept, and then graph. Identify the slope and one point, and then graph. Find the x - and y-intercepts and then graph.
Answers
The most convenient method to graph the line −3x−6y=12 is to identify the slope and one point, and then graph.
To find the slope, we can rearrange the equation into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b), where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Let's manipulate the equation:
−3x − 6y = 12
−6y = 3x + 12
y = -(1/2)x - 2
From the equation, we can determine that the slope (m) is -1/2. To graph the line, we need to identify at least one point on the line. We can choose any x-value and substitute it into the equation to find the corresponding y-value. Let's choose x = 0:
y = -(1/2)(0) - 2
y = -2
So, we have the point (0, -2) on the line. Now we can plot this point on the graph and use the slope to find additional points. The slope -1/2 means that for every increase of 1 unit in the x-direction, the y-value decreases by 1/2 unit. By applying this slope to the initial point (0, -2), we can plot more points and connect them to graph the line.
In summary, the most convenient method is to identify the slope and one point on the line, and then use the slope to plot additional points and graph the line.
Learn more about slope here:
brainly.com/question/3605446
#SPJ11
a) Prove that E( X
ˉ
)=μ X
b) Prove that Var( X
ˉ
)= n
σ 2
Answers
we have proved that E(X) = μ. and we have proved that Var(X) = (σ²) / n Using the linearity
a) To prove that E(X) = μ, where X is the sample mean and μ is the population mean, we can use the linearity of the expected value.
Let X₁, X₂, ..., Xₙ be independent and identically distributed random variables from a population with mean μ and standard deviation σ. The sample mean is defined as X = (X₁ + X₂ + ... + Xₙ) / n.
Using the linearity of the expected value, we have:
E(X) = E[(X₁ + X₂ + ... + Xₙ) / n]
= (E[X₁] + E[X₂] + ... + E[Xₙ]) / n
= (μ + μ + ... + μ) / n
= (nμ) / n
= μ
Therefore, we have proved that E(X) = μ.
b) To prove that Var(X) = (σ²) / n, where Xis the sample mean, σ² is the population variance, and n is the sample size, we will use the properties of the variance and the fact that the random variables X₁, X₂, ..., Xₙ are independent.
The variance of the sample mean is given by:
Var(X) = Var[(X₁ + X₂ + ... + Xₙ) / n]
Since the random variables X₁, X₂, ..., Xₙ are independent, we can use the property that the variance of the sum of independent random variables is the sum of their variances:
Var(X) = (1/n²) * (Var(X₁) + Var(X₂) + ... + Var(Xₙ))
Since all the Xᵢ are identically distributed, their variances are the same, equal to σ²:
Var(X) = (1/n²) (σ² + σ² + ... + σ²) (n times)
= (1/n²) (nσ²)
= σ² / n
Therefore, we have proved that Var(X) = (σ²) / n.
To learn more about variance click here:
brainly.com/question/33524605
#SPJ11
Find the current in a circuit with a voltage of 12 volts and an impedance of 2-4j ohms. Use the formula, E = I * Z, where E is the voltage measured in volts, i is the current measured in amperes, and z is the impedance measured in ohms
Answers
The current in the circuit is 0.6 + 0.3j Amperes (approximately).
To find the current in the circuit, we can rearrange the formula E = I * Z to solve for I.
I = E / Z
Substituting the given values, we get:
I = 12V / (2-4j)Ω
To simplify this expression, we need to rationalize the denominator by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator.
(2+4j)Ω is the complex conjugate of (2-4j)Ω.
So, multiplying both the numerator and denominator by (2+4j)Ω, we get:
I = 12V(2+4j)Ω / [(2-4j)Ω(2+4j)Ω]
Simplifying the denominator, we get:
I = 12V(2+4j)Ω / (4+16)Ω
I = 12V(2+4j)Ω / 20Ω
I = 0.6 + 0.3j Amperes (approximately)
Therefore, the current in the circuit is 0.6 + 0.3j Amperes (approximately).
Learn more about formula from
https://brainly.com/question/29797709
#SPJ11
