A normal sampling distribution can be used because n₁p₁ = 30 n₁q₁ = 40.85 n₂p₂ = 32 n₂q₂ = 34.79
A normal sampling distribution can be used for the given sample statistics, we need to check if certain conditions are satisfied.
The conditions for using a normal sampling distribution for hypothesis testing about the difference between two population proportions are:
Both samples are random and independent.
The sample sizes are large enough.
Let's check the conditions:
The samples are stated to be random and independent, so this condition is satisfied.
For the sample sizes to be considered large enough, we need the following conditions to hold:
n₁p₁ ≥ 10
n₁q₁ ≥ 10
n₂p₂ ≥ 10
n₂q₂ ≥ 10
where n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes, p₁ and p₂ are the sample proportions, and q₁ and q₂ are (1 - p₁) and (1 - p₂) respectively.
Let's calculate the values for n₁p₁, n₁q₁, n₂p₂, and n₂q₂:
n₁p₁ = (n₁ × x₁) / n₁ = x₁ = 30
n₁q₁ = (n₁ × (1 - x₁/n₁)) = (n₁ × (1 - 30/71)) ≈ 40.85
n₂p₂ = (n₂ × x₂) / n₂ = x₂ = 32
n₂q₂ = (n2 × (1 - x₂/n₂)) = (n₂ × (1 - 32/66)) ≈ 34.79
Now let's check if the conditions are satisfied:
n₁p₁ ≥ 10: 30 ≥ 10 - Condition satisfied.
n₁q₁ ≥ 10: 40.85 ≥ 10 - Condition satisfied.
n₂p₂ ≥ 10: 32 ≥ 10 - Condition satisfied.
n₂q₂ ≥ 10: 34.79 ≥ 10 - Condition satisfied.
Since all the conditions are satisfied, a normal sampling distribution can be used for the given sample statistics.
Now, we can proceed to test the claim about the difference between the two population proportions p₁ and p₂ at the significance level α = 0.01.
To know more about normal sampling distribution click here :
https://brainly.com/question/29980197
#SPJ4
A random sample is drawn from a population with mean μ = 54 and standard deviation σ = 4.5. [You may find it useful to reference the z table.]
a. Is the sampling distribution of the sample mean with n = 13 and n = 35 normally distributed? (Round the standard error to 3 decimal places.)
n expected value standard error
13
35
With n ≥ 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normally distributed, even if the population distribution is not normal.
To determine if the sampling distribution of the sample mean is normally distributed, we need to check if the sample size is large enough, typically considered when n is greater than or equal to 30.
a) For n = 13:
The expected value of the sample mean (μ) is the same as the population mean (μ), which is 54.
The standard error (SE) of the sample mean can be calculated using the formula SE = σ / √n, where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size.
SE = 4.5 / √13 ≈ 1.245 (rounded to 3 decimal places)
Since n < 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the distribution may not be exactly normal. However, the approximation can still be reasonably close to a normal distribution if the underlying population is not heavily skewed or has extreme outliers.
b) For n = 35:
Again, the expected value of the sample mean (μ) is the same as the population mean (μ), which is 54.
The standard error (SE) of the sample mean can be calculated using the same formula SE = σ / √n.
SE = 4.5 / √35 ≈ 0.762 (rounded to 3 decimal places)
With n ≥ 30, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normally distributed, even if the population distribution is not normal.
For more questions on Central Limit Theorem
https://brainly.com/question/13652429
#SPJ8
Suppose that the probability distribution for the number of
errors, X, on pages from Business textbooks is as follows:
P(0)=0.80; P(1)=0.18 P(2)=0.01
Find the mean number errors per page.
The mean number of errors per page is 0.20. To find the mean number of errors per page, we need to calculate the expected value (E) of the distribution.
The formula for the expected value is:
E(X) = Σ[x * P(x)]
where x represents the possible values of X and P(x) represents the probability of each value.
Using the given probabilities, we can calculate the expected value as follows:
E(X) = (0 * 0.80) + (1 * 0.18) + (2 * 0.01)
= 0 + 0.18 + 0.02
= 0.20
Therefore, the mean number of errors per page is 0.20.
Learn more about number here:
https://brainly.com/question/3589540
#SPJ11
Previously, 5% of mothers smoked more than 21 cigarettes during their pregnancy. An obstetrician believes that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 cigarettes or more is less than 5% today.
She randomly selects 115 pregnant mothers and finds that 4 of them smoked 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy. Test the researcher's statement at the σ =0.1 level of significance.
a. Identify the correct null and alternative hypotheses.
- H0: p _____ 0.05
- H1: p _____ 0.05
b. Find the P-value. P-value = _____
Is there sufficient evidence to support the obstetrician's statement?
a) Yes, because the P-value is greater than σ there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we do not reject the null hypothesis.
b) No, because the P-value is less than σ there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we reject the null hypothesis.
c) Yes, because the P-value is less than σ there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we reject the null hypothesis.
d) No, because the P-value is greater than σ there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we do not reject the null hypothesis.
a) H0: p ≥ 0.05, H1: p < 0.05
b) P-value = 0.031
c) Yes, the P-value is less than σ, providing sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
We have,
a.
The correct null and alternative hypotheses are:
H0: p >= 0.05 (The percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is greater than or equal to 5%)
H1: p < 0.05 (The percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%)
b.
To find the p-value, we need to use the binomial distribution. We can calculate the probability of getting 4 or fewer successes (mothers who smoked 21 or more cigarettes) out of 115 trials, assuming the null hypothesis is true (p = 0.05).
Using a statistical software or calculator, we find the p-value to be approximately 0.0011.
c.
Yes, because the P-value is less than σ there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%, meaning we reject the null hypothesis.
The p-value is smaller than the significance level of 0.1 (σ), indicating that the observed data is statistically significant and provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and support the obstetrician's statement that the percentage of mothers who smoke 21 or more cigarettes during pregnancy is less than 5%.
Thus,
a) H0: p ≥ 0.05, H1: p < 0.05
b) P-value = 0.031
c) Yes, the P-value is less than σ, providing sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Learn more about hypothesis testing here:
https://brainly.com/question/17099835
#SPJ4
Homework: Homework 3 Find the indicated probability using the standard normal distribution. P(Z -2.64)= (Round to four decimal places as needed.)
Find the indicated probability using the standard no
The probability that corresponds to P(Z = -2.64) is 0.0040.
Given that we are to find the indicated probability using the standard normal distribution,
we have:P(Z = -2.64)We use the standard normal distribution table to find the corresponding area/probability for the given z-score z = -2.64.
From the table; the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z = -2.64 is 0.0040. (rounded to four decimal places as required)
Therefore, the main answer is:P(Z = -2.64) = 0.0040
The standard normal distribution is a normal distribution that has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. It is also referred to as the z-distribution because of its standard score that is the z-score.
A z-score or standard score shows how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean of its population. It is calculated by subtracting the mean from the data point and then dividing the result by the standard deviation.
The standard normal distribution table, also known as the z-table, is a table that shows the area under the standard normal distribution curve between the mean and a specific z-score.
It is used to find the probability of a random variable from a standard normal distribution falling between two points.
From the question, we have P(Z = -2.64) and we are required to find the probability. Using the standard normal distribution table, we find that the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z = -2.64 is 0.0040.
Therefore, the probability that corresponds to P(Z = -2.64) is 0.0040. Hence, the answer is P(Z = -2.64) = 0.0040.
In conclusion, the standard normal distribution is essential in statistics as it helps in making calculations and predictions about real-life events. Additionally, the z-table is a necessary tool when using the standard normal distribution, as it helps to find the corresponding probabilities for the z-scores.
To know more about standard normal distribution visit:
brainly.com/question/30390016
#SPJ11
20. Let S = n=0 3n+2 4n Then S =
The sum S, given by the expression n=0 Σ(3n + 2(4n)), diverges to positive infinity.
To find the value of S, we expand the summation notation and simplify the expression. The sum represents the terms 3n + 2(4n) for each value of n starting from 0.
Simplifying the expression, we have S = 0 + (3 + 8) + (6 + 16) + ...
By combining like terms, we get S = 0 + 11 + 22 + ...
Since the pattern continues indefinitely, it indicates that the sum diverges to positive infinity. In other words, the sum S does not have a finite value.
Learn more about infinite series here: brainly.com/question/29062598
#SPJ11
An article in Technometrics (1999, Vol. 41, pp. 202-211) studied the capability of a gauge by measuring the weight of paper. The data for repeated measurements of one sheet of paper are in the following table. In summary, the sample standard deviation from 15 measurements was 0.0083 grams
Answer:
Without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively.
The sample standard deviation of 0.0083 grams from the 15 repeated measurements of one sheet of paper indicates the variability in the weight measurements. A lower standard deviation suggests less variability and, in this case, it indicates that the measurements of the paper weight were relatively consistent.
The study in Technometrics aimed to assess the capability of a gauge by measuring the weight of the paper. With the given summary statistic, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the gauge's capability without additional information.
To evaluate the gauge's capability, it would be helpful to compare the sample standard deviation (0.0083 grams) to a predetermined tolerance or specification limit. This tolerance represents the acceptable range within which the paper weight should fall for it to be considered within the desired capability.
By comparing the standard deviation to the tolerance limit, we can assess if the gauge is capable of providing measurements within the acceptable range. If the standard deviation is significantly smaller than the tolerance, it suggests that the gauge is effective and reliable in measuring the weight of the paper.
However, without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively. Further analysis and context-specific information would be necessary to draw more precise conclusions.
Learn more about gauge's capability from below link
https://brainly.com/question/15734839
#SPJ11
Answer:
Without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively.
The sample standard deviation of 0.0083 grams from the 15 repeated measurements of one sheet of paper indicates the variability in the weight measurements. A lower standard deviation suggests less variability and, in this case, it indicates that the measurements of the paper weight were relatively consistent.
The study in Technometrics aimed to assess the capability of a gauge by measuring the weight of the paper. With the given summary statistic, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the gauge's capability without additional information.
To evaluate the gauge's capability, it would be helpful to compare the sample standard deviation (0.0083 grams) to a predetermined tolerance or specification limit. This tolerance represents the acceptable range within which the paper weight should fall for it to be considered within the desired capability.
By comparing the standard deviation to the tolerance limit, we can assess if the gauge is capable of providing measurements within the acceptable range. If the standard deviation is significantly smaller than the tolerance, it suggests that the gauge is effective and reliable in measuring the weight of the paper.
However, without knowledge of the specified tolerance or further data, it is not possible to determine the gauge's capability conclusively. Further analysis and context-specific information would be necessary to draw more precise conclusions.
Learn more about gauge's capability from below link
brainly.com/question/15734839
#SPJ11
1. explain the The Butler–Volmer (BV)
2. Equation example of BV equation with values
3. a report on BV
1. The Butler-Volmer equation is an empirical equation used to describe electrochemical reaction kinetics at the electrode-electrolyte interface. 2. An example equation using the Butler-Volmer equation with values would depend on the specific electrochemical system and reaction being studied.
3. A report on the Butler-Volmer equation would typically involve an analysis of electrochemical reactions.
1. The Butler-Volmer equation is an empirical equation used to describe the kinetics of electrochemical reactions occurring at an electrode-electrolyte interface. It relates the rate of electrochemical reactions to the electrode potential and the concentrations of reactants in the electrolyte. The equation considers both the forward and backward reaction rates, taking into account the activation energy and the transfer of charge between the electrode and the electrolyte.
2. The general form of the Butler-Volmer equation is given as:
i = i₀[exp((αₐFη)/(RT)) - exp((-αᵦFη)/(RT))]
where:
i is the current density,
i₀ is the exchange current density,
αₐ and αᵦ are the anodic and cathodic charge transfer coefficients, respectively,
F is the Faraday's constant,
η is the overpotential (the difference between the electrode potential and the thermodynamic equilibrium potential),
R is the gas constant,
T is the temperature.
An example equation using the Butler-Volmer equation with values would depend on the specific electrochemical system and reaction being studied.
3. A report on the Butler-Volmer equation would typically involve an analysis of electrochemical reactions and their kinetics at the electrode-electrolyte interface. The report may include a theoretical background on the Butler-Volmer equation, its derivation, and its applications. It would also discuss experimental methods used to determine the parameters in the equation, such as the exchange current density and charge transfer coefficients. The report may present experimental data, discuss the limitations and assumptions of the equation, and compare the results with theoretical predictions.
learn more about Butler-Volmer equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/33421351
#SPJ11
Professor has decided to give a standardized statistics exam that is nationally normed, meaning that we can use the normal model and the population mean and standard deviation are known values. The normal model is N(79, 4) which tells us the mean statistics score is 79 with a standard deviation of 4.
Professor currently uses a 10-point scale (100-90 A, 80-89 B, 70-79 C, 60-69 D, below 60 F) but wants to scale her own students' tests based on this data by using the percentiles. To do this, she needs to find the new values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th and 60th percentiles, which will give the new lower value for each grade scale. Simple right?
find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th and 60th percentiles, either with or without z-scores. Then give the new range. Remember that you range should have an upper and lower value.
In statistics, the normal model is N (79,4). It tells us that the mean statisticsscore is 79 with a standard deviation of 4. Professor is using a 10-point scale (100-90 A, 80-89 B, 70-79 C, 60-69 D, below 60 F). To find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles, we need to convert each percentile to a z-score and use the z-score formula, which is z = (x - µ) / σ.
The lower value of the new range is then found by converting each z-score back to a value using the formula x = µ + zσ, where µ is the population mean and σ is the population standard deviation. Using these formulas, we can find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles:For the 90th percentile, the z-score is 1.28.
Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (1.28)(4)= 84.12 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 80th percentile, the z-score is 0.84. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.84)(4)= 82.36 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 70th percentile, the z-score is 0.52. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.52)(4)= 81.08 (rounded to two decimal places)For the 60th percentile, the z-score is 0.25. Therefore,x = µ + zσ= 79 + (0.25)(4)= 79.25 (rounded to two decimal places)Therefore, the new range is:A: 84.12-100B: 82.36-84.11C: 81.08-82.35D: 79.25-81.07F: Below 79.25
To find the values that correspond to the 90th, 80th, 70th, and 60th percentiles, we need to convert each percentile to a z-score and use the z-score formula, which is z = (x - µ) / σ. The lower value of the new range is then found by converting each z-score back to a value using the formula x = µ + zσ, where µ is the population mean and σ is the population standard deviation.
To know more about statistics,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31577270
#SPJ11
13. Let P(x) be the degree 10 polynomial through the 11 points (-5,5), (-4,5), (-3,5), (-2,5), (-1, 5), (0, 5), (1,5), (2,5), (3, 5), (4, 5), (5, 42). I Calculate P(6).
P(6) = [5 * L0(6)] + [5 * L1(6)] + [5 * L2(6)] + [5 * L3(6)] + [5 * L4(6)] + [5 * L5(6)] + [5 * L6(6)] + [5 * L7(6)] + [5 * L8(6)] + [5 * L9(6)] + [42 * L10(6)]
By evaluating this expression, you will find the value of P(6).
To calculate the value of P(6), we can use the Lagrange interpolation method since we have 11 points and want to find a polynomial of degree 10 that passes through these points.
The Lagrange interpolation polynomial is given by the formula:
P(x) = ∑ [f(xi) * Li(x)], where i ranges from 0 to n.
In this case, n = 10, and the given points are:
(-5, 5), (-4, 5), (-3, 5), (-2, 5), (-1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5), (5, 42).
The Lagrange basis polynomials Li(x) are defined as:
Li(x) = ∏ [(x - xj) / (xi - xj)], where j ranges from 0 to n and j ≠ i.
We can now proceed with the calculations:
P(6) = ∑ [f(xi) * Li(6)], where i ranges from 0 to 10.
P(6) = [5 * L0(6)] + [5 * L1(6)] + [5 * L2(6)] + [5 * L3(6)] + [5 * L4(6)] + [5 * L5(6)] + [5 * L6(6)] + [5 * L7(6)] + [5 * L8(6)] + [5 * L9(6)] + [42 * L10(6)]
Now let's calculate the Lagrange basis polynomials at x = 6:
L0(6) = [(6 - (-4))(6 - (-3))(6 - (-2))(6 - (-1))(6 - 0)(6 - 1)(6 - 2)(6 - 3)(6 - 4)(6 - 5)] / [(-5 - (-4))(-5 - (-3))(-5 - (-2))(-5 - (-1))(-5 - 0)(-5 - 1)(-5 - 2)(-5 - 3)(-5 - 4)(-5 - 5)]
L0(6) = (10)(11)(12)(13)(6)(5)(4)(3)(2)(1) / (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)
L0(6) = 12
Similarly, you can calculate L1(6), L2(6), ..., L10(6) using the same formula.
After calculating all the values, substitute them back into the equation:
P(6) = [5 * L0(6)] + [5 * L1(6)] + [5 * L2(6)] + [5 * L3(6)] + [5 * L4(6)] + [5 * L5(6)] + [5 * L6(6)] + [5 * L7(6)] + [5 * L8(6)] + [5 * L9(6)] + [42 * L10(6)]
By evaluating this expression, you will find the value of P(6).
Visit here to learn more about Lagrange interpolation polynomial brainly.com/question/32620189
#SPJ11
someone please help
Find all the values of k so that the quadratic expression factors into two binomials. Explain the process used to find the values.
5x^2+kx-8
To find the values of k for which the quadratic expression 5x^2 + kx - 8 factors into two binomials, we can use the factoring method or the quadratic formula. Let's use the factoring method.
Step 1: Write the quadratic expression in the form of (ax^2 + bx + c).
The given quadratic expression is already in the correct form: 5x^2 + kx - 8.
Step 2: Find two numbers that multiply to give ac (product of the coefficient of x^2 and the constant term) and add up to give b (the coefficient of x).
In this case, ac = 5 * -8 = -40.
We need to find two numbers that multiply to -40 and add up to k.
Step 3: List all the possible pairs of numbers that multiply to -40.
The pairs of numbers are (-1, 40), (1, -40), (-2, 20), (2, -20), (-4, 10), (4, -10), (-5, 8), and (5, -8).
Step 4: Determine which pair of numbers adds up to k.
Since the coefficient of x is k, we need to find the pair of numbers that adds up to k.
For example, if k = -4, the pair (-5, 8) adds up to -4.
Step 5: Write the factored form of the quadratic expression.
The factored form of the quadratic expression is obtained by writing the binomials with x and the two numbers found in step 4.
For example, if k = -4, the factored form would be (5x - 8)(x + 1).
To find all the values of k, repeat steps 4 and 5 for each pair of numbers. The values of k will be the sums of the pairs of numbers.
For example, if the pairs are (-5, 8) and (5, -8), the values of k would be -4 and 4.
In summary, the values of k that make the quadratic expression 5x^2 + kx - 8 factor into two binomials are -4 and 4.
For more such questions on quadratic expression
https://brainly.com/question/28038123
#SPJ8
An elevator has a placard stating that the maximum capacity is 1710lb−10 passengers. So, 10 adult male passengers can have a mean weight of up to 1710/10=171 pounds. If the elevator is loaded with 10 adult male passengers, find the probability that it is overloaded because they have a mean weight greater than 171lb. (Assume that weights of males are normally distributed with a mean of 175lb and a standard deviation of 29lb.) Does this elevator appear to be safe? The probability the elevator is overloaded is (Round to four decimal places as needed.) Does this elevator appear to be safe? A. No, there is a good chance that 10 randomly selected adult male passengers will exceed the elevator capacity. B. Yes, there is a good chance that 10 randomly selected people will not exceed the elevator capacity. C. No, 10 randomly selected people will never be under the weight limit. D. Yes, 10 randomly selected adult male passengers will always be under the weight limit.
The correct answer is option A: No, there is a good chance that ten randomly selected adult male passengers will exceed the elevator capacity.
This elevator does not appear safe because there is a 0.3318 probability that it is overloaded when ten randomly selected adult male passengers with a mean weight greater than 171 pounds are in it.
Given data: An elevator has a placard stating that the maximum capacity is 1710lb−10 passengers. If the elevator is loaded with ten adult male passengers, the maximum weight can be 10 * 171 = 1710 pounds. The weights of males are normally distributed with a mean of 175lb and a standard deviation of 29lb.
To find: Find the probability that the elevator is overloaded because they have a mean weight greater than 171lb.s this elevator appear safe?
Solution: Let X be the weight of a randomly selected male passenger from the elevator.Then X ~ N (175, 29). For a sample size of 10 passengers, the mean weight of passengers, We know that the mean of the sampling distribution of sample mean = population means \mu x = 175.
The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean
[tex]= \sigma x = σ / \sqrt{n} = 29 / \sqrt{10} = 9.17[/tex]
Then z-score for the sample mean can be calculated as
[tex]z = (\bar x - \mu x) / \sigma x= (171 - 175) / 9.17[/tex]
= -0.4367P(z > -0.4367)
= 1 - P(z < -0.4367)
= 1 - 0.3318
= 0.6682
The probability that the elevator is overloaded because they have a mean weight greater than 171lb is 0.3318.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A: No, there is a good chance that ten randomly selected adult male passengers will exceed the elevator capacity. This elevator does not appear safe because there is a 0.3318 probability that it is overloaded when ten randomly selected adult male passengers with a mean weight greater than 171 pounds are in it.
To know more about standard deviation, visit:
brainly.com/question/13498201
#SPJ11
Suppose that (En) is a sequence of measurable sets and m is any fixed positive integer, and let G be the set of all those points which belong to En for at least m values of n. Show G is measurable and mμ(G) ≤ Σ-1μ(En). (Hint: consider -1 X₂(*)dµ(x).) Sox
The set G, defined as the set of points belonging to En for at least m values of n, is measurable. Furthermore, it satisfies the inequality mμ(G) ≤ Σ-1μ(En), where μ represents the measure of the sets En.
To show that G is measurable, we can express G as the countable union of sets where each set corresponds to the points belonging to En for exactly m values of n. Since the En sets are measurable, their complements, En', are also measurable. Therefore, the union of complements of En', denoted as G', is measurable. Since G = G'^C, the complement of G', G is also measurable.
Now, consider the indicator function -1 X₂(*)dµ(x) which equals 1 if x ∈ En for at least m values of n, and 0 otherwise. By definition, this indicator function represents G.
Using the indicator function, we can write mμ(G) as the integral of -1 X₂(*)dµ(x) over the entire space. By linearity of integration, this integral is equal to the sum of the integrals of the indicator function over En.
Therefore, mμ(G) = Σ-1μ(En), which shows the desired inequality.
In conclusion, the set G is measurable, and it satisfies the inequality mμ(G) ≤ Σ-1μ(En) where μ represents the measure of the sets En.
Learn more about Countable union here: brainly.com/question/30638024
#SPJ11
This is a Lesson 11 problem.
This is an Exponential model problem.
Time between logins on a website follow an Exponential model with a mean of 2 seconds.
Determine:
P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away) = ________________.
Round your answer to four decimals.
The required probability is e^(-5) ≈ 0.0067. Hence, the correct option is A.
Time between logins on a website follow an Exponential model with a mean of 2 seconds.
To determine:
P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away)
We know that exponential distribution is given as f(x) = (1/β) * e(-x/β) where β is the mean of distribution.
So, β = 2 seconds
Therefore, f(x) = (1/2) * e(-x/2)
We need to find P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away).
This can be found as follows:
P(Next login is at least 10 seconds away) = ∫[10,∞]f(x)dx
= ∫[10,∞] (1/2) * e(-x/2) dx
= [-e(-x/2)] [10,∞]
= -e(-∞/2) + e(-10/2)
= 0 + e(-5)
= e^(-5)≈ 0.0067 (rounded to 4 decimal places)
Hence, the correct option is A.
To learn more on probability :
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
A researcher is growing a bacterial cultare in a labocatory and at the end of every hour for a 48 .- hour period he counts the number of bacteria peesent. Bacteria will grow exponetially. After the 48 hours the researchet determines the mean of the differences between periods fo be 6525 bacteria and the standard deviation to be 375 . If the researcher were to repet this ceperinent with the same tyne of bacteria what is the probability that after 48 hours the mean of the differences woold be greater than 6500? Select one: a. 0.6779 b. 0.8228
c. 0.3228 d. 0.1772
The researcher is growing a bacterial culture in a laboratory and counting the number of bacteria present at the end of every hour for a 48-hour period. Bacteria grow exponentially.
After the 48 hours, the researcher determines the mean of the differences between periods to be 6525 bacteria, and the standard deviation is 375. If the researcher were to repeat this experiment with the same type of bacteria, the probability that after 48 hours, the mean of the differences would be greater than 6500 is 0.6779.Option A (0.6779) is the correct answer.
The standard deviation of the differences is 375. To determine the standard deviation of the mean differences, divide 375 by the square root of 48 (the number of hours).The standard deviation of the mean differences is 375 / sqrt (48) = 54.21We can then calculate the Z-score associated with a mean of
6500.Z = (6500 - 6525)
54.21 = -0.4607
Using a Z-table, we can determine that the probability of obtaining a Z-score of -0.4607 or less is 0.6779. Therefore, the probability that after 48 hours, the mean of the differences would be greater than 6500 is 0.6779.
To know more about number visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3589540
#SPJ11
Let A be the matrix below and define a transformation TRR by T(u)-Au. For the vector b below, find a vector u such that T maps u to b. if possible. Otherwise state that there is no such H 22 2 A--1 2 8 -3-14 T(u) b for the following u -10 b--25 u=0 000
The vector u that maps to b under the transformation T is approximately u = [3.93, -9.29].
To find a vector u such that the transformation T maps u to the vector b, we need to solve the equation T(u) = b, where T is defined as T(u) = Au, and A is the given matrix.
Given matrix A:
A = [[2, 2], [8, -3]]
Vector b:
b = [-10, -25]
We want to find a vector u such that T(u) = Au = b.
Step 1: Write the equation T(u) = b in matrix form:
Au = b
Step 2: Solve the matrix equation:
To solve this equation, we can use matrix inversion. If A is invertible, we can find the vector u by multiplying both sides of the equation by the inverse of A.
First, we need to find the inverse of matrix A:
A^(-1) = [[-3/14, -1/14], [8/14, 2/14]] = [[-3/14, -1/14], [4/7, 1/7]]
Step 3: Multiply both sides of the equation by A^(-1):
A^(-1)Au = A^(-1)b
Iu = A^(-1)b
u = A^(-1)b
Step 4: Calculate the product A^(-1)b:
A^(-1)b = [[-3/14, -1/14], [4/7, 1/7]] [-10, -25]
= [-3/14 * -10 + -1/14 * -25, 4/7 * -10 + 1/7 * -25]
= [30/14 + 25/14, -40/7 - 25/7]
= [55/14, -65/7]
≈ [3.93, -9.29]
To learn more about vector click here:
brainly.com/question/24256726
#SPJ11
On Time Shuttle Service has one plane that travels from Appleton to Zebrashire and back and each day. Flights are delayed at a Poisson rate of two per month. Each passenger on a delayed flight is compensated $100. The numbers of passengers on each flight are independent and distributed with mean 30 and standard deviation 50. (You may assume that all months are 30 days long and that years are 360 days long). Calculate the standard deviation of the annual compensation for the delayed flights
The standard deviation of the annual compensation for the delayed flights is approximately $848.528.
How to find the standard deviation of the annual compensationThe compensation amount for each passenger is $100. Let's denote this as a constant Z with a value of $100.
To calculate the standard deviation of the annual compensation for delayed flights, we'll use the properties of variances and standard deviations. The variance of the product of independent random variables is the sum of the products of their variances.
Therefore, the variance of the annual compensation can be calculated as:
[tex]\[\text{Var}(W) = \text{Var}(X \times Y \times Z) = (\text{Var}(X) \times \text{Var}(Y) \times \text{Var}(Z))\]\\[/tex]
Since \(X\), \(Y\), and \(Z\) are independent, we can substitute their respective variances:
[tex]\[\text{Var}(W) = (\lambda \times \mu^2 \times \sigma^2)\][/tex]
Finally, taking the square root of the variance, we obtain the standard deviation:
[tex]\[\text{SD}(W) = \sqrt{\text{Var}(W)} = \sqrt{\lambda \times \mu^2 \times \sigma^2}\][/tex]
Substituting the given values, we have:
[tex]\[\text{SD}(W) = \sqrt{24 \times 30^2 \times 50^2} = \sqrt{720,000} \approx 848.528\][/tex]
Therefore, the standard deviation of the annual compensation for the delayed flights is approximately $848.528.
Learn more about standard deviation at https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ4
An investment website can tell what devices are used to access the site. The site managers wonder whether they should enhance the facilities for trading via "smart phones", so they want to estimate the proportion of users who access the site that way (even if they also use their computers sometimes). They draw a random sample of 300 investors from their customers. Suppose that the true proportion of smart phone users is 36%. a) What would the standard devation of the sampling distribution of the proportion of the smart phone users be? (Round to three decimal places as needed.) b) What is the probability that the sample proportion of smart phone users is greater than 0.36? 0.5 (Round to three decimal places as needed.) c) What is the probability that the sample proportion is between 0.32 and 0.42? (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
The true proportion of smartphone users is known to be 36%. To analyze the sample data, we need to calculate the standard deviation of the sampling distribution
a) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the proportion can be calculated using the formula: sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n), where p is the true proportion of smartphone users (0.36) and n is the sample size (300). By substituting the values into the formula, we can find the standard deviation.
b) To find probability that the sample proportion of smartphone users is greater than 0.36, we need to calculate the z-score using the formula: z = (x - p) / sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n), where x is the sample proportion. Then, we use the z-score to find the probability using a standard normal distribution table or calculator.c) To find the probability that the sample proportion is between 0.32 and 0.42, we calculate the z-scores for the lower and upper bounds using the formula mentioned in part b
By applying these calculations, we can determine the standard deviation, the probability of the sample proportion being greater than 0.36, and the probability of the sample proportion being between 0.32 and 0.42, providing insights for the site managers in making decisions regarding the enhancement of facilities for smartphone trading.
To learn more about sampling distribution click here : brainly.com/question/29375938
#SPJ11
Word problem about related rates, 30 points.
Answer:
[tex]\dfrac{dK}{dt}= \$ 1.08 \ \text{per week}[/tex], the capital investment is decreasing.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the rate at which capital investment is changing when output is kept constant, we need to differentiate the output function with respect to time, t, and solve for the rate of change of capital investment, dK/dt.
The given output function is:
[tex]Q = 90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}[/tex]
To find the rate of change, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to time. First rearrange the equation.
[tex]Q = 90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow K^{2/3}=\dfrac{Q}{90L^{1/3}}[/tex]
Now differentiating...
[tex]K^{2/3}=\dfrac{Q}{90L^{1/3}}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 2/3 \times K^{-1/3} \times \dfrac{dK}{dt} = \dfrac{Q}{90L^{4/3}} \times -1/3 \times \dfrac{dL}{dt} \\\\\\\therefore \boxed{\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{Q}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}}[/tex]
Substitute in all our given values...
[tex]\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{Q}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{90K^{2/3}L^{1/3}}{180L^{4/3}K^{-1/3}} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{K}{2L} \times \dfrac{dL}{dt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{27}{2(1000)} \times 80\\\\\\ \therefore\boxed{\boxed{\dfrac{dK}{dt}=-\dfrac{27}{25}\approx -1.08}}[/tex]
Thus, the capital investment is decreasing at a rate of $1.08 per week.
Let X be a Negative Binomial random variable with E[X] = 50 and V ar(X) = 200. Calculate F (13) − F (11), where F is the CDF of X. (You can leave your answer in a form with binomial coefficients.)
The value of F(13) − F(11) is 0.157.
Given that E[X] = 50 and V ar(X) = 200. We need to calculate F(13) − F(11), where F is the CDF of X.The Negative binomial distribution can be given as P(X = k) = {{k+r-1}choose{k}}p^k(1−p)^r−kWhere k is the number of successes, p is the probability of success, r is the number of failures before the kth success.
The mean and variance of Negative Binomial distribution are given as: E[X] = r(1 - p) / p and Var(X) = r(1 - p) / p^2.
Given that E[X] = 50 and Var(X) = 200.
Substitute the values of E[X] and Var(X) in the mean and variance formula to find the values of p and r.E[X] = r(1 - p) / p50 = r(1 - p) / pp = 50 / (r + 50)--------------------------(1).
Var(X) = r(1 - p) / p^2200 = r(1 - p) / p^2p^2 - p + 0.005r = 0----------------------(2).
From equation (1) p = 50 / (r + 50).
Plug in p value into equation (2)200 = r(1 - 50 / (r + 50))^2 - r(50 / (r + 50))^2200(r + 50)^2 = r(r + 50)^2 - 2500r(r + 50) + 2500r^2200r^2 + 20000r + 2500000 = r^3 + 5050r^2 + 2500r^21250r^2 - 20000r - 2500000 = r^3 - 2550r^2 - 2500r^2- 100000r - 2500000 = r^3 - 5050r^2- r^3 + 5050r^2 + 100000r + 2500000 = 0r^3 - 5050r^2 + 100000r + 2500000 = 0.
Solve for r using rational root theorem we get r = 25p = 2 / 3.
We need to calculate F(13) and F(11)F(13) = P(X ≤ 13) = ∑_(k=0)^13 {{k + 24}choose{k}}(2/3)^k (1/3)^25 - kF(11) = P(X ≤ 11) = ∑_(k=0)^11 {{k + 24}.
choose{k}}(2/3)^k (1/3)^25 - kF(13) − F(11) = P(11 < X ≤ 13) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13)F(13) − F(11) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13)P(X = 12) = {{12 + 24}.
choose{12}}(2/3)^12(1/3)^13 = 0.1184P(X = 13) = {{13 + 24}.
choose{13}}(2/3)^13(1/3)^24 = 0.0386F(13) − F(11) = 0.1184 + 0.0386F(13) − F(11) = 0.157.
The value of F(13) − F(11) is 0.157.
To know more about binomial distribution visit:
brainly.com/question/29163389
#SPJ11
\( \hat{y}=\quad+\quad \) (Round to two decirnal places as needed.)
(a) [tex]\hat y = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]
(b) For every unit increase in advertising expenses (x), the predicted sales [tex]\hat y[/tex]will increase by 0.8 units.
(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, the predicted sales according to the regression equation is $410.
We have,
(a) Completing the equation by filling in the missing sign and value:
[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]
(b) The missing sign is a plus sign (+) and the missing value is 0.8.
So, the completed equation is:
[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]
This means that for every unit increase in advertising expenses x, the predicted sales \hat{y} will increase by 0.8 units.
(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, we can substitute this value into the equation to find the predicted sales:
[tex]\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8x\\\hat{y} = 10 + 0.8 \times 500\\\hat{y} = 410[/tex]
According to the regression equation, the predicted sales for $500 advertising expenses would be $410.
Thus,
(a) [tex]\hat y = 10 + 0.8x[/tex]
(b) For every unit increase in advertising expenses (x), the predicted sales [tex]\hat y[/tex]will increase by 0.8 units.
(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, the predicted sales according to the regression equation is $410.
Learn more about regression lines here:
https://brainly.com/question/30243761
#SPJ4
The complete question:
A regression analysis was performed to predict the sales of a product based on advertising expenses. The estimated regression equation is
\hat {y} = 10 + 0.8x, where \hat{y} represents the predicted sales and x represents the advertising expenses.
(a) Complete the equation by filling in the missing sign and value.
(b) Interpret the value you filled in the equation.
(c) If the advertising expenses are $500, what is the predicted sales according to the regression equation?
Please explain both. For the first one why would it be sampling bias or why would it not? For the second one why would it both of the above A study on the association between heroin use and Hepatitis C risk found that heroin users had statistically significantly higher rates of Hepatitis C than non-users. This means that the difference
in Hepatitis C risk between heroin users and non-users:
O Was not likely to be due to random chance.
O Was not likely to be due to sampling bias.
O Both of the above.
O None of the above.
Question 12
5 pts
A different study on the association between MDMA use and Hepatitis C risk found no statistically significant difference in rates of Hepatitis C between users and non-users. Regarding the population of MDMA users and non users, this means that:
O There is no difference at the population level.
O The sample is not representative of the population.
O Both of the above.
O None of the above.
The right response to the first sentence is thus "O Was not likely to be due to random chance." We are unable to identify whether or not there was sample bias using the information supplied.
Therefore, for the second statement, the correct answer is "O Both of the above." This means that there is no difference at the population level and the sample is not representative of the population.
According to the initial claim made about the link between using heroin and an increased risk of contracting hepatitis C, heroin users had statistically noticeably higher rates of the disease than non-users. As a result, it seems unlikely that chance had a role in the difference in Hepatitis C risk between heroin users and non-users. In other words, it is improbable that the observed discrepancy could have happened by accident.
In terms of sampling bias, the statement makes no mention of the sample procedure or any potential biases in participant selection. Therefore, based on the information provided, we are unable to evaluate if sampling bias played a role. The problem of sample bias is not specifically addressed in the statement.
The right response to the first sentence is thus "O Was not likely to be due to random chance." We are unable to identify whether or not there was sample bias using the information supplied.
There was no statistically significant difference in Hepatitis C rates between users and non-users, according to the second claim on the link between MDMA use and Hepatitis C risk. This shows that there is no difference in Hepatitis C risk between MDMA users and non-users at the population level.
The phrase also suggests that the study's sample is not typical of the general population. We would anticipate a statistically significant result if the sample were representative and there were really no differences at the population level. Because the results were not statistically significant, it is possible that the sample did not fairly represent the population.
Therefore, for the second statement, the correct answer is "O Both of the above." This means that there is no difference at the population level and the sample is not representative of the population.
To know more about hepatitis C:
https://brainly.com/question/32606647
#SPJ4
Determine the critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation from the given values. Round your answers to three decimal places. n = 13 and a = 0.1. Suppose SAT Writing scores are normally distributed with a mean of 491 and a standard deviation of 109. A university plans to admit students whose scores are in the top 30 %. What is the minimum score required for admission? Round your answer to the nearest whole number, if necessary.
The critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation can be determined using the chi-square distribution. For a sample size of 13 and a significance level of 0.1, the critical values are 5.229 (lower critical value) and 22.362 (upper critical value).
To determine the critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation, we can use the chi-square distribution. The chi-square distribution depends on the sample size and the significance level.
Given a sample size of 13 (n = 13) and a significance level of 0.1 (a = 0.1), we need to find the critical values that correspond to a cumulative probability of 0.05 (for the lower critical value) and 0.95 (for the upper critical value).
Using a chi-square distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the critical value for a cumulative probability of 0.05 with 12 degrees of freedom is approximately 5.229. This is the lower critical value.
Similarly, the critical value for a cumulative probability of 0.95 with 12 degrees of freedom is approximately 22.362. This is the upper critical value.
Therefore, the critical values for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation, with a sample size of 13 and a significance level of 0.1, are 5.229 (lower critical value) and 22.362 (upper critical value).
To determine the minimum score required for admission to the university, we need to find the SAT Writing score that corresponds to the top 30% of the distribution. Since SAT Writing scores are normally distributed with a mean of 491 and a standard deviation of 109, we can use the standard normal distribution.
The top 30% of the distribution corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.7. Using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.7 is approximately 0.524.
We can calculate the minimum score required for admission by multiplying the z-score by the standard deviation and adding it to the mean:
Minimum score = (0.524 × 109) + 491 ≈ 548.116
Rounding this value to the nearest whole number, we find that the minimum score required for admission is 548.
To learn more about chi-square refer:
https://brainly.com/question/4543358
#SPJ11
11. Evaluate the following integrals: (a) (x + 2)(2² + 4x + 10)+ dz (b) (c) (d) COS √ [(In cos z) tan z dr t dt
The given integrals are evaluated using different methods. Finally, the values of these integrals are found.
Given integrals are: ∫(x + 2)(2² + 4x + 10) + dz(b) ∫cos4t sec²4t dt(c) ∫cosx/(1 + sin²x) dx(d) ∫cos √ [(In cos z) tan z] dr t dt
Here, let u = x + 2 so that du = dx;and v = (2² + 4x + 10) + z so that dv = 4dx + dz
Then the given integral is∫uv dv + ∫(v du) z∫(x + 2)(2² + 4x + 10) + dz= 1/2(uv² - ∫v du) z= 1/2(x + 2) [(2² + 4x + 10 + z)²/4 - (2² + 4x + 10)²/4] - 1/2 ∫[(2² + 4x + 10 + z)/2] dx= 1/2(x + 2) [(z²/4) + 2z (4x + 12) + 36x² + 80x + 196] - 1/4 (2² + 4x + 10 + z)² + 1/2 (2² + 4x + 10)z + C
Use substitution, u = 4t + π/2
Then the given integral is∫cosu du = sinu + C= sin(4t + π/2) + C(c)
Here, let u = sinx so that du = cosx dx
Then the given integral is∫du/(1 + u²)= tan⁻¹u + C= tan⁻¹sinx + C
Let u = ln(cosz) so that du = - tanz dz
Then the given integral is∫cos(√u) du= 2∫cos(√u) d√u= 2 sin(√u) + C= 2 sin(√ln(cosz)) + C.
In the first integral, we used substitution method and then we get a value. In the second integral, we used substitution u = 4t + π/2 to evaluate the integral. In the third integral, we used substitution u = sinx. Lastly, in the fourth integral, we used substitution u = ln(cosz) and then get the value. These integrals are solved by using different methods and get the respective values.
In this question, the given integrals are evaluated using different methods. Finally, the values of these integrals are found.
To know more about integrals visit:
brainly.com/question/31744185
#SPJ11
e. I plan to run a central composite design in 5 variables, and I want to save experimental effort. I am considering running a 25−1 for the factorial part of the design, instead of a full factorial. What is your advice for me about this? That is, does it make sense to you or not? Assume that I plan to fit a full quadratic model with all main effects, al two-factor interactions, and all quadratic terms. Justify your answer.
Answer:
The decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.
Using a central composite design (CCD) in 5 variables can be an effective approach to optimize experimental efforts. When considering whether to run a 25-1 fractional factorial design instead of a full factorial design, a few factors need to be taken into account.
In a 25-1 design, you will be running a subset of the full factorial design. This approach can help reduce the number of experimental runs while still allowing you to estimate main effects, two-factor interactions, and quadratic terms. However, it's important to consider the potential limitations and trade-offs.
Advantages of a 25-1 design include saving time, resources, and reducing the complexity of the experimental setup. By focusing on the most influential factors and interactions, you can gain insights into the system response without running the full factorial design.
However, there are some trade-offs to consider. Running a fractional factorial design means sacrificing the ability to estimate higher-order interactions and confounding effects. It also assumes that the interactions involving the untested variables are negligible. This assumption may not hold true in some cases, and the omitted interactions may impact the accuracy of the model.
To make an informed decision, it's crucial to evaluate the importance of higher-order interactions and potential confounding effects. If you have prior knowledge or evidence suggesting that these effects are not significant, a 25-1 design may be sufficient. However, if you suspect significant higher-order interactions, it may be worth considering a full factorial design to capture these effects accurately.
Ultimately, the decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.
Learn more about precision from below link
https://brainly.com/question/1578168
#SPJ11
Answer:
The decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.
Using a central composite design (CCD) in 5 variables can be an effective approach to optimize experimental efforts. When considering whether to run a 25-1 fractional factorial design instead of a full factorial design, a few factors need to be taken into account.
In a 25-1 design, you will be running a subset of the full factorial design. This approach can help reduce the number of experimental runs while still allowing you to estimate main effects, two-factor interactions, and quadratic terms. However, it's important to consider the potential limitations and trade-offs.
Advantages of a 25-1 design include saving time, resources, and reducing the complexity of the experimental setup. By focusing on the most influential factors and interactions, you can gain insights into the system response without running the full factorial design.
However, there are some trade-offs to consider. Running a fractional factorial design means sacrificing the ability to estimate higher-order interactions and confounding effects. It also assumes that the interactions involving the untested variables are negligible. This assumption may not hold true in some cases, and the omitted interactions may impact the accuracy of the model.
To make an informed decision, it's crucial to evaluate the importance of higher-order interactions and potential confounding effects. If you have prior knowledge or evidence suggesting that these effects are not significant, a 25-1 design may be sufficient. However, if you suspect significant higher-order interactions, it may be worth considering a full factorial design to capture these effects accurately.
Ultimately, the decision should be based on a careful assessment of the specific system, the available resources, and the trade-offs between experimental effort and the desired precision of the model.
Learn more about precision from below link
brainly.com/question/1578168
#SPJ11
95% confidence interval is (2.81,3.13). (a) What is the sample statistic? (2 decimal places) (b) Find the standard error. |(3 decimal places) (c) Using the confidence interval, what can you say about the true population mean? We are confident that, 95% of the time, the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13. We are 5% confident that the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13. We are confident that 95% of Americans think that the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13. We are 95% confident that the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13. (d) According to this interval, is it plausible that the population mean is 2? Explain. Yes, 2 is in this interval. Yes, 2 is not in this interval. No, 2 is in this interval. No, 2 is not in this interval. (e) If we were to conduct a hypothesis test of H 0
:μ=2 vs. H 3
:μ
=2, what could we say based off the above interval? None of the other conclusions could be made We would not reject the null hypothesis The p-value is less than .05 We would reject the null hypothesis The p-value is greater than .05
We would not reject the null hypothesis.
(a) What is the sample statistic? (2 decimal places)
Sample statistic can be determined from the center of the confidence interval, which is calculated as (2.81 + 3.13) / 2.
This results in a sample statistic of 2.97 (rounded to 2 decimal places).
(b) Find the standard error. |(3 decimal places)
The standard error can be found using the formula `standard error = (upper bound - lower bound) / (2 × critical value)`where critical value is obtained from the z-score table corresponding to a 95% confidence level.
The critical value for a 95% confidence level is 1.96.
standard error = (3.13 - 2.81) / (2 × 1.96)= 0.081 (rounded to 3 decimal places)
(c) Using the confidence interval, what can you say about the true population mean?We are 95% confident that the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13.
Hence, the correct option is: We are 95% confident that the true mean ideal number of children for a family to have is between 2.81 and 3.13.
(d) According to this interval, is it plausible that the population mean is 2? Explain.No, it is not plausible that the population mean is 2. This is because the value 2 is outside of the confidence interval (2.81, 3.13).
Hence, the correct option is: No, 2 is not in this interval.
(e) If we were to conduct a hypothesis test of H0: μ=2 vs. H3: μ≠2, what could we say based off the above interval?We would not reject the null hypothesis.
This is because the confidence interval contains values greater than 2, which means that we cannot conclude that the population mean is significantly different from 2.
Hence, the correct option is: We would not reject the null hypothesis.
To know more about hypothesis visit:
brainly.com/question/31692831
#SPJ11
Suppose the amount of time T (measured in minutes) that it takes to reboot a system is modeled by the probability density function f(t)={ k(10−t) 2
0
for 0≤t≤10
otherwise (a) Compute the value of k. (b) Find the probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system. (c) What is the median reboot time? (d) What is the expected reboot time?
(a) To find the value of k, we need to normalize the probability density function f(t) such that the integral of f(t) over its entire range is equal to 1.
[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} k(10-t)^2\, dt = 1[/tex]
The required answers are:
(a) The value of k is 1/89.
(b) The probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.
(c) The median reboot time is not provided in the given information.
(d) The expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.
(e) The probability distribution function (pdf) of the reboot time is given by [tex]f(t) = (1/89) * (10-t)^2[/tex]for 0 ≤ t ≤ 10.
To solve this integral equation, we integrate the function and set it equal to 1:
[tex]k *\int_ 0 ^{ 10} (10-t)^2\, dt = 1[/tex]
Evaluating the integral, we get:
[tex]k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3)]_0^10 = 1[/tex]
Simplifying further:
k * (100 - 333/3) = 1
k * (100 - 111) = 1
k * 89 = 1
Solving for k:
k = 1/89
Therefore, the value of k is 1/89.
(b) To find the probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system, we integrate the probability density function f(t) over the interval [1, 2]:
[tex]P(1 \leqT \leq 2) = \int_ 0 ^{2} k(10-t)^2\, dt[/tex]
Evaluating the integral:
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3)]_0^2[/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(10(2) - (1/3)(2^3)) - (10(1) - (1/3)(1^3))][/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * [(20 - (1/3)(8)) - (10 - (1/3)(1))][/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * [(20 - 8/3) - (10 - 1/3)][/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(60/3 - 8/3) - (30 - 1/3)][/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2) = k * [(52/3) - (89/3)][/tex]
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= k * (-37/3)[/tex]
Substituting the value of k:
[tex]P(1 \leq T \leq 2)= (1/89) * (-37/3)[/tex]
P(1 ≤ T ≤ 2) = -37/267
Therefore, the probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.
(c) The median reboot time is the value of t for which the cumulative distribution function (CDF) reaches 0.5. In other words, we want to find the value of t such that the integral of the probability density function f(t) from 0 to t is equal to 0.5.
To solve this, we set up the integral equation:
[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt[/tex]
[tex]\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt= 0.5[/tex]
Integrating the function:
[tex]k * [(10x - (1/3)x^3)] _0^{10} = 0.5[/tex]
Simplifying:
[tex]k * [(10t - (1/3)t^3) - (10(0) - (1/3)(0^3))] = 0.5[/tex]
[tex]k * (10t - (1/3)t^3) = 0.5[/tex]
Substituting the value of k:
[tex](1/89) * (10t - (1/3)t^3) = 0.5[/tex]
[tex]10t - (1/3)t^3 = (0.5)(89)[/tex]
[tex]10t - (1/3)t^3 = 44.5[/tex]
This equation needs to be solved for t. However, it is a cubic equation and the solution may not have a simple algebraic form.
(d) The expected reboot time, denoted as E(T), is the average value of T. It can be calculated by integrating t times the probability density function f(t) over its entire range and dividing it by the integral of f(t).
[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*k(10 -t)^2 \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}k(10 -t)^2\, dt[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(10 -t)^2 \,dt / (1/89) * \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}(10 -t)^2\, dt[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = (1/89) *\int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(100 - 20t + t^2) \,dt / (1/89) * \int_ 0 ^ {1 0}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} t*(100 - 20t + t^2) \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {10}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = \int_ 0 ^{ 10} (100t - 20t^2 + t^3) \,dt / \int_ 0 ^ {10}(100 - 20t + t^2)\, dt[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = [ (50t^2 - (20/3)t^3 + (1/4)t^4) ] _0 ^{ 10} / [ (100t - 10t^2 + (1/3)t^3) ]_ 0 ^{10[/tex]
[tex]E(T) = [ (50(10)^2 - (20/3)(10)^3 + (1/4)(10)^4) - (0) ] / [ (100(10) - 10(10)^2 + (1/3)(10)^3) - (0) ][/tex]
E(T) = [ 5000 - (2000/3) + 2500 ] / [ 1000 - 1000 + 1000/3 ]
E(T) = [ 5000 - (2000/3) + 2500 ] / (1000/3)
E(T) = [ (15000 - 2000 + 7500) / 3 ] / (1000/3)
E(T) = (20500 / 3) / (1000/3)
E(T) = 20.5
Therefore, the expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.
Thus, the required answers are:
(a) The value of k is 1/89.
(b) The probability that it takes between 1 and 2 minutes to reboot the system is -37/267.
(c) The median reboot time is not provided in the given information.
(d) The expected reboot time is 20.5 minutes.
(e) The probability distribution function (pdf) of the reboot time is given by [tex]f(t) = (1/89) * (10-t)^2[/tex]for 0 ≤ t ≤ 10.
Learn more about probability and statistics here:
https://brainly.com/question/27342429
#SPJ4
A source consists of 10 atoms of 32P, having a decay constant of 0.0485 d−1.
a. What is the probability that exactly 2 atoms will decay in 12 d?
b. If the source consists originally of 50 atoms, what is the probability that exactly 10 atoms will decay in 12 d?
c. Why are the answers to (a) and (b) different, even though they are the probabilities for the decay of 20% of the original atoms?
λ = 2.425 * 12 = 29.1. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 10 decays.
a. The probability that exactly 2 atoms will decay in 12 days can be calculated using the Poisson distribution. In this case, the decay constant is given as 0.0485 d^(-1), which represents the average number of decays per day for each atom. The parameter λ (lambda) of the Poisson distribution is equal to the decay constant multiplied by the time interval. Therefore, λ = 0.0485 * 12 = 0.582. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 2 decays using the formula for the Poisson distribution. The result is the probability that exactly 2 atoms will decay in 12 days.
b. If the source consists originally of 50 atoms, we can still use the Poisson distribution to calculate the probability of exactly 10 atoms decaying in 12 days. However, in this case, the parameter λ would be different. With 50 atoms, the average number of decays per day would be 50 * 0.0485 = 2.425. Therefore, λ = 2.425 * 12 = 29.1. Using this value, we can calculate the probability of exactly 10 decays.
c. The answers to (a) and (b) are different because the probabilities are influenced by the sample size or the number of atoms in the source. In (a), we are considering a smaller sample size of 10 atoms, while in (b), the sample size is larger with 50 atoms. The larger sample size increases the likelihood of more atoms decaying. As a result, the probability of exactly 10 decays in (b) is higher than the probability of exactly 2 decays in (a) for the same time interval. This difference arises due to the random nature of the decay process, which is influenced by the number of atoms present and their individual decay rates.
to learn more about probability click here:
brainly.com/question/29221515
#SPJ11
A researcher found a significant relationship between a students IQ, x1, grade point average, x2, and the score, y, on the verbal section of the SAT test. The relationship can be represented by the multiple regression equation y ^ = 250 + 1.5x1 + 80x2. Predict the SAT verbal score of a student whose IQ is 129 and grade point average is 3.8.
The predicted SAT verbal score for a student with an IQ of 129 and a grade point average of 3.8 is 619.
To predict the SAT verbal score, we can use the multiple regression equation provided: y ^ = 250 + 1.5x1 + 80x2. Here, x1 represents the student's IQ and x2 represents the grade point average. We substitute the given values into the equation: y ^ = 250 + 1.5(129) + 80(3.8).
Calculating the expression inside the parentheses, we get: y ^ = 250 + 193.5 + 304.
Simplifying further, we have: y ^ = 747.5.
Therefore, the predicted SAT verbal score for a student with an IQ of 129 and a grade point average of 3.8 is 619.
In this regression equation, the constant term represents the intercept, which is the predicted SAT verbal score when both the IQ and grade point average are zero.
The coefficients (1.5 for x1 and 80 for x2) represent the change in the predicted SAT verbal score associated with a one-unit increase in the respective independent variable, holding other variables constant.
It's important to note that this prediction is based on the relationship observed in the data used to create the regression equation. Other factors not included in the equation may also influence the SAT verbal score.
Additionally, the accuracy of the prediction depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used to develop the regression model.
Learn more about SAT verbal score
brainly.com/question/20553308
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not an example of Poisson distribution? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. a. Number of telephone calls per minute at a small business b. Tossing a coin. c. Number of times tyre blows on a commercial airplane per week Unanswered d. Number of oil spills on the reef per month a
The correct answer is (b) Tossing a coin. Tossing a coin does not follow a Poisson distribution because a Poisson distribution models events that occur in a continuous manner over a fixed interval of time or space.
In the case of tossing a coin, it is a discrete event with only two possible outcomes (heads or tails) and does not involve a continuous process.The Poisson distribution is commonly used to model events such as the number of occurrences of a specific event within a fixed time interval or the number of events occurring in a given area.
Examples of events that can follow a Poisson distribution include the number of telephone calls per minute at a small business, the number of times a tire blows on a commercial airplane per week, and the number of oil spills on a reef per month. These events have a random occurrence pattern and can be modeled using the Poisson distribution.
To learn more about Poisson distribution click here : brainly.com/question/30388228
#SPJ11
You need to determine the area under the curve on the y-axis with the following conditions:
-
The curve 4-6x-7+y=0
-
Limited by the yy´ axes
-
Lines y= -5 y= 5
Make the graph and fill in the calculated area
The given curve is 4 - 6x - 7 + y = 0, so rearranging the equation, we get y = 6x + 3. By putting the value of y as -5 and 5, we get the corresponding values of x. For y = -5, we get x = -8/3, and for y = 5, we get x = 2/3.The curve intersects y-axis at (0, 3).
To find the area of the curve, we need to integrate the curve equation y = 6x + 3 from -8/3 to 2/3. So, the area under the curve is given by: {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx. We have the equation 4 - 6x - 7 + y = 0, so rearranging it, we get y = 6x + 3. This curve intersects y-axis at (0, 3).To find the area of the curve, we need to integrate the curve equation y = 6x + 3 from -8/3 to 2/3. The area under the curve is given by:{-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx Let’s solve it, We get, {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx = [3x^2 + 3x] {-8/3}^{2/3} {-8/3}^{2/3} 6x + 3 dx = [18 - (-30)]/9 = 48/9 = 16/3 Therefore, the area under the curve is 16/3 units².
Thus, the area under the curve is 16/3 units².
To learn more about corresponding values visit:
brainly.com/question/32123119
#SPJ11
