The answers include:
This is referred to as the amount by which net long-term capital gain or the situation in which the allowable capital losses are lesser than your capital gains.Net capital loss is referred to as the allowable capital losses are greater than your capital gains, you have a net capital loss.Net capital position in referred to as the worth of an organization which include assets etc.What is Capital?This is referred to as the sum of money which is used to start a business so as to earn profit.
The net capital position is the worth and how much funds are available to the organization thereby making it the correct choice.
Read more about Capital here https://brainly.com/question/23631000
#SPJ1
Prosecutors are popular characters in legal dramas, both on television and in movies. The role of prosecutors in these forms of entertainment is designed to provide maximum dramatic effect.
Based on your notes and what you have learned, write an essay in which you compare and contrast the role of the prosecutor in the film with what you have learned about the activities and responsibilities of real-world prosecutors. What might explain the inconsistencies between real-world prosecutors and those in the movies? Make sure you mention the title and year of the film.
thx
The comparison of both roles is that they often bring criminals to justices and help the weak.
The contrast of the role of the prosecutor in the film with real-world prosecutors is that those of movies tends to be very dutiful and pay more attention to their work whether do or die and some can often accept a lot of bribe and this is not the case with real world where a case may take time and the people may not have justice.
What is the prosecutor's most crucial responsibility?The prosecutor's main responsibility is to pursue justice within the letter and spirit of the law, not just to secure a conviction.
A prosecutor must represent the state as a prosecutor in cases involving criminal offenders. After the accused has been questioned by the judge, he must appear in court during the trial and state the major accusations. After the evidence is examined by the court, he must continue to have the same views.
Therefore, The state's interests are represented by the public prosecutor. After the police have completed their investigation and submitted the charge sheet to the court, their duty will then begin. They are not involved in the probe in any way.
Learn more about prosecutors from
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
Should some citizens bear more responsibility in a society then others?
Answer ASAP
giving brainliest
Answer BOTH questions using the IRAC Method (Issue, Relevant law, Analysis (apply the facts) and Conclusion) 1. Renessa offered to sell her art collection to Kacy for 10 thousand dollars cash on October 9,2022. Kay responds the same day and asks whether half can be paid upfront and then the remainder at the end of the month. Renessa did not reply so Kacy responded again and accepted the offer on the following day October 10, 2022. Kacy showed up at Renessa's office on the afternoon of October 11th with the $10,000 in cash and was told that Renessa sold the art collection to Shannon since she had not accepted the offer. Kacy is adamant that she accepted the offer. Advise Kacy on whether she has a contractual right to the art collection.
It is to be noted that Kacy does not have a contractual right to the art collection. An explanation is given below using IRAC.
The Issues:The issue here is that there is a contention about whether or not there was an acceptance of the offer as a premise for the exercise of contractual rights.
It is to be noted that Acceptance of an Offer is defined as "a display of acquiescence to the conditions [of the offer] expressed by the offeree in the manner encouraged or required by the offer."
Relevant Law:
A related case would be that of Entores v. Miles Far East Corp.
Lord Denning held that the offeree or someone authorized by the offeree must indicate acceptance. It is not a genuine acceptance if someone accepts on behalf of the offeree without authorization.
Analysis
What was the manner encouraged by the offer? The offer was an art collection to Kacy for $10,000 cash on October 9, 2022.
The three elements that characterized the offer are:
Art Collection$10,000 CashOctober 9, 2022.The question is, was the offer accepted by the offeree on the above-state date for the said amount? The answer to that is no. Rather, the offeree, rather than accept the offer made an inquiry about a possible modification of terms to accommodate part payments with the balance to be paid at a later date.
Note that an inquiry is not the same as an acceptance of or rejection of the offer. See Stevenson V McLean (1880).
Although the offeree eventually accepted the offer, she came on a later day - October 11th, two days after the offer had expired.
On the strength of the above facts and the position of the law, suffice it to conclude that Kacy has no contractual right to the art collection.
Learn more about contractual rights:
https://brainly.com/question/28097915
#SPJ1
Neil is building a new home. Jasper is neil’s contractor. The plans for the new house require that a fence on the edge of neil’s property be torn down because the new house will extend ten feet beyond the fence. Jasper tears down the fence and starts marking out the framework for the foundation of the new house. Neil’s neighbor, jasmine, sues neil and jasper for trespass to property because that land is actually jasmine’s property, a fact that neil knew all along. Can both neil and jasper be held liable for trespass to property?.
Yes, Neil and Jasper can both be held liable for trespass to property.
What is trespassing?Threats, assault, battery, wounding, mayhem (or maiming), and wrongful imprisonment were the six distinct transgressions that historically made up trespass to the person. The majority of jurisdictions now broadly recognize three trespasses to the person: assault, battery, and false imprisonment. Assault is defined as "any act of such a nature as to excite an apprehension of battery"; battery is defined as "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with it"; and battery is defined as "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with.
To learn more about trespassing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15302881
#SPJ13
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of _____ district courts.
Congress has created many courts beneath article iii section i. presently, the federal courtroom system is composed of 94 district-stage trial courts and 13 courts of appeals take a seat under the splendid court docket.
American district courts are the trial courts of the U.S. federal judiciary. there may be one district courtroom for each federal judicial district, which every cowl one U.S. state or, in a few instances, a portion of a state. each district courtroom has at least one courthouse, and plenty of districts have a couple. Federal courts enjoy the sole energy to interpret the regulation, determine the constitutionality of the regulation, and use it in individual instances. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony via the usage of a subpoena.
The Federal courtroom of Malaysia (Malay: Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia) is the highest courtroom and the final appellate courtroom in Malaysia. it's far housed inside the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. The court turned into installed throughout Malaya's independence in 1957 and acquired its contemporary call in 1994.
Learn more about Federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/25947870
#SPJ4
Matt has been a runner for several years but has never participated in a marathon. He decides to make that his goal, training hard to ready himself. Matt isn’t interested in where he places in the race, just that he is able to accomplish his goal. According to Freud’s theories, what part of Matt’s personality is behind this self-improvement?
A.
id
B.
ego
C.
empathy
D.
superego
Based on the fact that Matt wants to accomplish his goal of running the marathon, the part of his personality behind this self-improvement is the B. ego.
What are the parts of Freudian Personality?According to famed psychologist, Sigmund Freud, the personality of a person is framed by three parts which are the Id, the Ego and the Superego.
The Id is the part of a human that is most animal like. It seeks immediate gratification from pleasurable activities and so is not capable of thinking in the long term.
The ego is the part that has to make decisions for the person and it does this by balancing the demands of the Id and the demands of the Superego in various proportions.
The Superego is the morally upright part of a person's personality and will judge them when they don't meet these morals.
Because the ego is the one that makes decisions, it is most likely the part that is behind the self-improvement drive of Matt.
Find out more on Freud's parts of personality at https://brainly.com/question/7185941
#SPJ1
Explain the pros and cons of making a plea bargain as opposed to going to trial. Make sure to discuss the pros and cons from BOTH the prosecutor's and defense attorney's perspective as well as that of the defendant.
Concerning making a plea bargain as opposed to going to trial:
The Pros of plea bargain are: more likely lesser charge, lighter sentence, getting everything over with quickly etcThe Cons of plea bargain are: the innocent will can be induced to plead guilty, convictions of innocent people etc.What is known as plea bargaining?In the law sphere, a plea bargaining refers to the practice of negotiating an agreement between the prosecution & defense party whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to more of the offenses charged in an exchange for more lenient sentencing, recommendations, specific sentence, dismissal of charges etc.
Most often, the supporters of a plea bargaining claim that it speeds court proceedings and guarantees a conviction whereas the opponents plea bargaining believe that it prevents justice from being served.
Also, a plea bargains are not always easy to recognize. The negotiations that result in a formal agreements are called the explicit plea bargains while the some are called implicit plea bargains because they involve no guarantee of leniency.
Read more about plea bargaining
brainly.com/question/19557127
#SPJ1
a sentence with a fixed minimum and maximum term of incarceration , rather than a set period of time is known as
Instead of a predetermined length of time, an indeterminate sentence has a definite minimum and maximum term of incarceration.
In terms of the law, a "indeterminate sentence" is a term of imprisonment with no set end date but a permitted maximum. The parole authority chooses who is qualified for parole. In this regard incarceration, an indeterminate sentence varies from a definite one in that regulations dictating the latter typically provide for parole eligibility after a specific percentage of the complete term—in most nations, from one-half to two-thirds of the initial sentence.
During the last quarter of the 19th century's reformatory movement, indeterminate sentence were invented. Rather than a sentence handed down by a judge, release was based on how well the incarceration training program was going. As of right now, the parole authorities, field parole officers, and prison staff are the ones that propose a person be released on parole after serving an indeterminate sentence.
Learn more about indeterminate sentence here
https://brainly.com/question/7202734
#SPJ4
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of _____ courts of appeals.
Congress has created many courts under article iii section i. Currently, the federal court system is composed of 13 Courts of Appeals.
Article III establishes the federal court docket gadget. the first phase creates the U.S.'s very best court docket as the federal machine's highest courtroom. The ideally suited court docket has the very last say on topics of federal regulation that come before it.
There are thirteen appellate courts that take a seat below the U.S. ideally suited court, and they may be referred to as the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The ninety-four federal judicial districts are prepared into 12 nearby circuits, every of which has a court docket of appeals.
Article III courts (also called Article III tribunals) are the U.S. superb court and the inferior courts of the united states hooked up by Congress, which currently are the thirteen united states of America courts of appeals, the 91 united states district courts (together with the districts of D.C. and Puerto Rico.
First it creates a countrywide government inclusive of a legislative, an government, and a judicial branch, with a system of exams and balances among the three branches. 2d, it divides energy among the federal government and the states. And third, it protects various men's or woman liberties, yanks residents.
Learn more about Article III courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/11783763
#SPJ4
Testimonial evidence is more useful in investigations then physical evidence a. True b.False
The statement, "testimonial evidence is more useful in investigations then physical evidence", is false.
Physical evidence is considered to be much more reliable than the testimonial evidence in investigations. It is seen that some convictions are based solely on eyewitness accounts. The court likes physical evidence as they are the items which court can see and examine.
Testimonial evidence is used for proving or disproving different things. This evidence can be used by both the prosecution and the defense. For instance, the prosecution may summon a police officer in order to confirm the identity of the defendant as the person who was at the crime scence and the events which transpired.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about physical evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/1083531
#SPJ1
1)In what ways is the concept of Due Process and the Rule of Law connected? Where are examples of this in the U.S. Constitution.
2) Describe the four central issues of the Rights of the Accused. Describe a scenario that could come up in the future that would fall into one of these central issues that is not discussed in the article.
3) What are the critical protections needed to ensure Due Process in America? Are those reflected in the Constitution or should there be an amendment added to ensure Due Process.
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
1a: The Fundamental values and laws of a country, state, or social group that define the roles and responsibilities of the government and provide certain protections for its citizens. b: a document that encapsulates a political or social organization's regulations.
What connections exist between the ideas of due process and the rule of law? Where can one find examples of this in America? Constitution.No one shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law," according to the Fifth Amendment, and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, enacted in 1868, utilizes the same eleven words to describe a duty on all states.
What are the accused's four rights?The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.
How do you imagine the future?Decide on the main problem or query.
Think about business aspects that might have an impact on the main issue.
Describe the outside factors that will affect the problem.
Make a list of the important uncertainties.
Limit the potential futures.
Describe each selected situation in its entirety.
What essential safeguards are required to guarantee due process in America?An impartial court.
Notification of the proposed action and the claimed justifications.
Opportunity to discuss arguments against the suggested action.
A person's ability to present evidence, particularly their ability to summon witnesses.
The right to be aware of contrary evidence.
The ability to question opposing witnesses directly.
Are issues addressed under the Constitution, or is a new amendment necessary to guarantee due process?Overview. A citizen must be given notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision by an impartial decision-maker when the federal government takes a course of action that robs them of their life, liberty, or property interest. This is known as procedural due process.
To Know more about Fundamental
https://brainly.com/question/2224584
#SPJ13
examples of misleading
Grounds for U.S. courts to hear a case arises from matters of federal law or U.S. constitution, This is more commonly known as:
O Majority opinions
O Federal questions
O Stare decisis
O Common law
O None of the above
Explanation: can only be heard if they are authorized by the Constitution or federal statutes
- I need help with this question but no one is helping me! Can someone please help me! I need 200 words for both parts 1 and 2, thanks a lot.
Answer:
If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.
Explanation:
Which of the following is part of the enumerated powers of the federal government?
Select one:
a. Right to conduct local elections
b. Power to tax
C. Right to regulate intrastate commerce
d. Right to establish a local government
Answer: D. right to establish a local government
If you were on trial for a crime and were asked by the prosecutor where you were on the night the crime was committed, which of the following rights could you invoke to protect you from testifying against yourself?
A. the Third Amendment
B. the First Amendment
C. the Fifth Amendment
D. the Tenth Amendment
knowledge of falsity and reckless disregard for the truth are two elements of the legal concept called
Actual malice is defined by the Supreme Court as actual knowledge that the statement is false or reckless disregard for the truth. This means you made a claim understanding it was false and then published it.
Actual Malice
This means you either published a statement knowing it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the statement's truth or falsity. Courts deciding whether you acted with actual malice consider your state of mind at the time you made the defamatory statement.
In defamation claims, the reckless disregard for truth element requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant had grave reservations about the precision of the material.
Learn more on Actual malice-
https://brainly.com/question/8961894
#SPJ4
2. A secretary in an accounting office takes home a printer she found stored in the closet at work. She reasons that no one has been using it so she might as well get some use out of it. What kind of crime is this an example of?
O Individual Occupational Crime
O State Authority Occupational Crime Organizational Occupational Crime Professional Occupational Crime
Answer:
individual occupational crime
What was the term for the documents arguing that states could declare federal laws unconstitutional?.
Answer:
The Kentucky (and Virginia) Resolutions of 1798 under the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
what are the essential requisites of an obligation give example
An active subject, who has the power to demand the prestation, known as the creditor or oblige , A passive subject, who is bound to perform the prestation, known as debtor or obligor.
Examples of Obligations?If a person consistently misses their car payments, the automaker will seize and reclaim the vehicle.An obligation is a legal need to give, to perform, or not to do anything. Taxes are a type of duty, and failing to pay them results in steep fines or jail. 1. For an obligation to have legal force, it must be of a juridical type. Through this, the fulfilment of an obligation may be ordered by the court. An obligation can be natural or civil.
To learn more about Obligations refer:
https://brainly.ph/question/4063243
#SPJ9
Is a coup d’ etat considered force majeure? Discuss its legal implications to the hotel industry which might be used as headquarters in case of military takeover.
The Brazilian Revolt of 1930: A military coup d'état that overthrew President Washington coup d'etat and installed the Brazilian military junta of 1930 followed an armed revolution.
The crime of coup d'etat is a sudden the assault accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth, directed the against duly elected government officials in the Philippines military, as well as any military camp or installation, communications network, public utilities, or other facilities required for the exercise. "A sudden attempt by a small group of people to the take control of the government, the typically via violence," is what a coup d'état is.
To learn more about military, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28357806
#SPJ1
A company may be able to use the trademark of another business if they
have a
Permission slip
O court order
O license
O VPN
Answer:
The answer that would make the most sense is the license.
Explanation:
Think about licensed items, ex. A baseball cap.
The team is trademarked but the company producing merchandise of it is independent. All with the help of a license.
Are creating customers who are educated about their needs and all the available options for meeting those needs
Demand and supply are creating consumers who are educated about their needs and all the general options for fulfilling those needs
What is Demand and supply?Demand is the consumer's desire and willingness to purchase a product or service at a specific time or over time. Customers must also be able to pay for something they want or need based on their disposable income budget. Demand is defined as the amount of a commodity that a consumer is able and willing to purchase at each possible price over a given time period. The term supply refers to the amount of a specific product, item, commodity, or service that suppliers are willing to make available at a specific price. The amount of that product, item, commodity, or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at a given price is referred to as demand.To learn more about Demand and supply, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18320379
#SPJ9
Fundamentally, the supreme court decisions in baker v. Carr and reynolds v. Sims were based on the principle of.
Fundamentally, the supreme court decisions in baker v. Reynolds v. Sims set up that the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires each house of the state legislature to be apportioned primarily based on the populace.
In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), the use of the very best court's precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in country legislatures ought to be apportioned similarly on the basis of the populace rather than geographical regions, remarking that “legislators represent human beings, no longer acres or trees.
In Reynolds v. united states of America, ninety-eight U.S. one hundred forty-five (1879), the ultimate court ruled unanimously that a federal law prohibiting polygamy did no longer violate the unfastened workout clause of the primary modification. The courtroom's decisions become a few of the first to preserve that the free exercise of faith isn't absolute.
Learn more about Reynolds here:
https://brainly.com/question/26760046
#SPJ4
What is the most common method of fingerprint detection used at a crime scene?
Group of answer choices
Iodine Fuming
Ninhydrin
Silver Nitrate
Powders
Answer:
loop are the most common
Explanation:
Fingerprint powders, iodine fuming, and silver nitrate are considered the “classic” methods, because they have been used since the 19th century.
why are plea bargains important to the criminal justice system (own words, 4 or more sentences)
Plea bargains is widely practiced for practical reasons. Defendants can avoid the time and expense of defending themselves in court, the risk of harsher penalties, and the publicity that a trial can bring.
Criminal justice is about giving justice to those accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and agencies. Goals include rehabilitation of offenders, prevention of other crimes, and providing emotional support to victims.
To best serve people, criminal justice professionals must demonstrate integrity, dedication, and a resource fulness that builds trust. Police officers and judges must act according to the laws of their country, not based on their personal feelings about a person's situation.
Learn more about Criminal justice https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
Suppose a law has been declared unconstitutional. What can be done to try to make it constitutional?.
Answer:
This scenario means that some judicial court, state level, municipal (county), federally, or the Supreme Court, has said a law violates the constitution. If the Supreme Court does this, nothing can be done besides writing a new law that is constitutionally sound. If any court besides for the Supreme Court rules a law as unconstituional, one can appeal their case that the law actually is constitutional to the Supreme Court or any higher level court. I.e. a state court rules a law unconstitutional, the Supreme Court or federal appellate court for that district can hear an appeal.
Explanation:
which kinds of cases involve intermediate scrutiny?
Intermediate scrutiny is used only when a state or the federal government passes a law that harms certain protected classes.
Intermediate scrutiny is a test that courts will use to determine the constitutionality of a statute. Intermediate scrutiny is used only when a state or the federal government passes a law that harms certain protected classes. In the context of freedom of speech, intermediate scrutiny is the test or benchmark of review that courts use when comparing content-neutral speech to content-based speech. Speech based on content is subjected to rigorous scrutiny.
When it comes to gender bias under the Equal Protection Clause, we typically encounter intermediate scrutiny. It also needs to apply to some First Amendment issues that are not covered in this course.
Learn more on Intermediate scrutiny-
https://brainly.com/question/13038239
#SPJ4
One of the "Four P's" is to project a
professional image. Which of the following
items is NOT a key component of a
customer friendly image?
a. Personal appearance
b. Fancy jewelry
c. Eye contact
d. Smile
can someone answer this rq need it within the next hour or so.
will mark brainiest
Answer:
1. F
2. A
3. C
4. D
5. G
6. E
7. A
8. B
9. D
10. A
11. A
12. A
13. A
14. B
Explanation:
10-14 are very confusing, most of the questions before involve murder, while these are not murder base making the most likely answer just that they are intentional act or no intent.
