Find the midpoint of the segment with the following endpoints.
(-2,7) and (-10, -1)

Answer:  

.00000008025

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between the two models and why real estate should have its own asset allocation model.

The Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return. It is calculated by dividing the excess return of an investment over a benchmark by the standard deviation of the investment's returns. The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better the investment's risk-adjusted return.

The Cheng, Lin, and Liu model is a more complex model that takes into account the time horizon of the investment, the volatility of the investment, and the correlation between the investment and the benchmark. The model is designed to maximize the Sharpe ratio of the investment over a specified time horizon.

The real estate market is different from the financial market in several ways. Real estate is a illiquid asset, meaning that it can be difficult to sell quickly. Real estate is also a cyclical asset, meaning that its prices tend to go up and down over time. Real estate is also a heterogeneous asset, meaning that there is a wide variety of properties available, each with its own unique characteristics.

Because of these differences, the real estate market should have its own asset allocation model. A model that is designed for the financial market may not be appropriate for the real estate market. A real estate asset allocation model should take into account the illiquidity, cyclicality, and heterogeneity of the real estate market.

Here are some additional reasons why real estate should have its own asset allocation model:

Real estate is a long-term investment. The typical holding period for real estate is 10 years or more. This is different from the financial market, where the typical holding period is much shorter.

Real estate is a leveraged investment. This means that investors can use borrowed money to purchase real estate. This can magnify the potential returns of real estate, but it can also magnify the potential losses.

Real estate is a local investment. The value of real estate is often driven by local factors, such as the job market, the economy, and the demographics. This means that real estate investments should be tailored to the specific market in which they are located.

Overall, the real estate market is different from the financial market in several ways. These differences make it important for real estate investors to have their own asset allocation model.

To know more about the Sharpe ratio refer here,

https://brainly.com/question/32631008#

#SPJ11

Answer:

When x=1,y=2

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to know the y value when x=1

Go to the right  along the x axis to where x=1, then go up until you hit the function.  Determine the y value

When x=1,y=2

The polynomial and the factored expression that match with each other are given below:

[tex]X^2 - 4x - 12 : (x - 6)(x + 2)2x^2 + 5x - 12 : (2x + 3)(x - 4)3x^2 -9x- 12 : (x - 4)(3x + 1)[/tex]

Explanation:

To solve the given problem, we need to factorize the given polynomials first. Then, we can match them with the given factored expressions. To factorize each of the given polynomials:

Polynomial [tex]1: X^2 - 4x - 12[/tex]

Factorizing the given polynomial:  We need to find the factors of -12 which add up to -4.-6 and 2 are the factors of -12 and add up to -4.

Hence,[tex]X^2 - 4x - 12 = (x - 6)(x + 2)[/tex]

Polynomial [tex]2: 2x^2 + 5x - 12[/tex]

Factorizing the given polynomial: We need to find the factors of 2 × -12 = -24 which add up to 5.-3 and 8 are the factors of -24 and add up to 5.

Hence, [tex]2x^2 + 5x - 12 = (2x + 3)(x - 4)[/tex]

Polynomial [tex]3: 3x^2 - 9x - 12[/tex]

Factorizing the given polynomial: We can factor 3 out from the given polynomial. [tex]3(x^2 - 3x - 4) = 3(x - 4)(x + 1)[/tex]

Hence, [tex]3x^2 - 9x - 12 = (x - 4)(3x + 1)[/tex]

Therefore, the polynomial and the factored expression that match with each other are:

[tex]X^2 - 4x - 12 : (x - 6)(x + 2)2x^2 + 5x - 12 : (2x + 3)(x - 4)3x^2 -9x- 12 : (x - 4)(3x + 1).[/tex]

To know more about polynomial visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

x+1/2x+2/3x+4=30, which has one solution

Answer:

I am pretty sure it is 16 rows.

Step-by-step explanation:

I subtracted 601 by 553, and got 48. I did the same with 649 and 601 and got 48. You would then add 48 to 649 and keep going until you get to 793. Then you would count how many times you added. The times you added plus 13, should get you 16. You should have added 3 times in all

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation: You get y = -2x +5, so the slope is –2. Perpendicular lines have opposite-reciprocal slopes, so the slope of the line we want to find is 1/2. Plugging in the point given into the equation y = 1/2x + b and solving for b, we get b = 6. Thus, the equation of the line is y = ½x + 6.

Answer:

gyxgdygdygadyqgygyuzfryur

Step-by-step explanation:

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Jim should choose Option A preferable for sales above $7,142.86.

To determine which option is more advantageous for Jim, we can compare the earnings under each option based on Jim's total sales (x dollars).

Option A: Weekly pay of $300 plus 3.5% of total sales.

Earnings under Option A = $300 + 0.035x

Option B: Flat rate of $550 for the week.

Earnings under Option B = $550

To determine which option is more beneficial, we need to compare the earnings. If the earnings under Option A are higher than the earnings under Option B for a given value of x, then Option A is preferable. Otherwise, if the earnings under Option B are higher, then Option B is preferable.

Let's compare the two options for different values of x:

For Option A to be more advantageous:

$300 + 0.035x > $550

Simplifying the inequality:

0.035x > $550 - $300

0.035x > $250

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 0.035:

x > $250 / 0.035

x > $7,142.86

So, if Jim's total sales for the week (x) exceed $7,142.86, Option A would be more advantageous.

For values of x less than or equal to $7,142.86, Option B would be more advantageous.

It's important to note that this analysis assumes that Jim's earnings are solely based on either Option A or Option B, and there are no other factors or commissions involved in his compensation.

Learn more about sales here:-

https://brainly.com/question/28219469

#SPJ11

Answer:

-20c-160

Step-by-step explanation:

-10(9c-7c+8)-80

-10(2c+8)-80

-20c-80-80

-20c-160

Answer:

>

Step-by-step explanation:

(14 – 8) ÷ 2 is equal to 3

14 – 8 ÷ 2  is equal to 10

The correct symbol in the relation is (14 – 8) ÷ 2< 14 – 8 ÷ 2.

Inequalities are the mathematical expressions in which both sides are not equal. In inequality, unlike in equations, we compare two values. The equal sign in between is replaced by less than (or less than or equal to), greater than (or greater than or equal to), or not equal to sign.

For example, Olivia is selected in the 12U Softball.

How old is Olivia? You don't know the age of Olivia, because it doesn't say "equals". But you do know her age should be less than or equal to 12, so it can be written as Olivia's Age ≤ 12. This is a practical scenario related to inequalities.

Given:

(14 – 8) ÷ 2 _____ 14 – 8 ÷ 2

Now, solving both expression we have

(14 – 8) ÷ 2

= 6 /2

=3

and,  14 – 8 ÷ 2

=14 - 4

=10

Hence, the correct symbol in the relation is (14 – 8) ÷ 2< 14 – 8 ÷ 2.

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ2

Answer:

$1.20

Step-by-step explanation:

18 / 15

1.20

1.20 * 15

18

Therefore $1.20 is your answer

Hope this helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I have a calculator that figures this out. I have no idea how to do this manually.

f(x) = (x+2)(x-3)(2x + 1)

Answer:

Y = $30 + $8x

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Shipping World International Shipping rate = $30 plus $8 per pound per package

Where ;

$30 is a constant fee

$8 is the fee charged per pound weight of package

Let weight of package in pounds = x

Y = shipping rate * weight of package

Y = $30 + $8x

The Golden Rule Test suggests that the decision embodies the principles of empathy and fairness, treating others as one would want to be treated. The Publicity Test indicates that the decision has been well received and is aligned with public expectations.

- The Publicity Test is designed to assess whether the decision or action can withstand public scrutiny and be disclosed openly.

- I score this test an 8 because the decision or action in question has already been made public and received positive feedback from various stakeholders.

- The organization has been transparent in its communication, engaging with the public and addressing concerns promptly.

- The decision aligns with the organization's values and mission, which resonates positively with the public.

- The organization has effectively managed any potential negative publicity by proactively addressing criticisms and providing clear justifications for the decision.

- Overall, the Publicity Test indicates that the decision has been well received and is aligned with public expectations.

The Moral Mentor Test Score: 6

- The Moral Mentor Test evaluates the decision or action by considering whether it reflects the guidance of a wise and ethical mentor.

- I score this test a 6 because while the decision is generally ethical, there are some potential ethical dilemmas that need to be carefully addressed.

- The decision has considered the welfare of various stakeholders and adheres to legal and regulatory frameworks.

- However, there might be some moral complexities associated with certain aspects of the decision that need further evaluation.

- It is important for the organization to seek guidance from ethical experts and consider potential long-term consequences to ensure the decision aligns with the principles of a moral mentor.

- Overall, the Moral Mentor Test suggests that the decision is on the right track but requires careful ethical analysis and considerations.

The Admired Observer Test Score: 9

- The Admired Observer Test assesses whether the decision or action would be approved by an admired and objective observer.

- I score this test a 9 because the decision demonstrates a high level of integrity and is likely to be approved by an objective observer.

- The decision is aligned with industry best practices and follows ethical guidelines.

- It takes into account the interests of various stakeholders and aims to maximize positive outcomes for all parties involved.

- The decision is well-reasoned, considering both short-term and long-term implications.

- Overall, the Admired Observer Test indicates that the decision is commendable and likely to be seen as fair and ethical by an objective observer.

The Transparency Test Score: 7

- The Transparency Test evaluates whether the decision-making process is transparent and accountable.

- I score this test a 7 because while the decision-making process has been relatively transparent, there is room for improvement.

- The organization has provided some level of information and rationale behind the decision, but there may be areas where more transparency is required.

- It is essential for the organization to proactively communicate the decision, its underlying factors, and potential impacts to ensure stakeholders have a clear understanding.

- Increasing transparency can help build trust and mitigate any potential misunderstandings or mistrust.

- The Person in the Mirror Test assesses whether the decision or action aligns with the individual's values and principles.

- I score this test an 8 because the decision demonstrates alignment with the individual's values and principles.

- The decision-maker has considered the ethical implications and personal integrity while making the decision.

- The decision reflects a commitment to fairness, honesty, and accountability.

I score this test a 9 because the decision demonstrates a high level of empathy and fairness towards others.

- The decision considers the interests and well-being of various stakeholders, treating them with respect and dignity.

- It reflects a commitment to fairness, equality, and reciprocity in relationships.

- The organization has taken steps to ensure that the decision does not cause harm or disproportionately benefit any specific group.

- Overall, the Golden Rule Test suggests that the decision embodies the principles of empathy and fairness, treating others as one would want to be treated.

Learn more about empathy here

https://brainly.com/question/20047598

#SPJ11

Answer:

You are trying to find the percentage of 50, 12.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply 25 and 50;  25 x 50 = 1,250

Divide 1250 by 100

1250/100

= 12.5

Answer:

The distributive property

Step-by-step explanation:

Nora essentially distributing the parts of the problem.

Please tell me if I'm wrong and I'll fix my answer.

Answer:

its the distributive property

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the

test

The appropriate test statistic for this test is approximately 0.2103 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

To find the appropriate test statistic for a 2-sample z-test for two proportions, we need to calculate the standard error and then use it to compute the z-score. The formula for the standard error is:

SE = sqrt[(p1 * (1 - p1) / n1) + (p2 * (1 - p2) / n2)]

Where p1 and p2 are the sample proportions, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

In this case, we have the following values:

X1 = 24 (number of successes in sample 1)

n1 = 200 (sample size 1)

X2 = 17 (number of successes in sample 2)

n2 = 150 (sample size 2)

To calculate the sample proportions, we divide the number of successes by the respective sample sizes:

p1 = X1 / n1 = 24 / 200 = 0.12

p2 = X2 / n2 = 17 / 150 = 0.1133

Now, we can plug these values into the formula to calculate the standard error:

SE = sqrt[(0.12 * (1 - 0.12) / 200) + (0.1133 * (1 - 0.1133) / 150)]

SE ≈ 0.0319

Finally, the test statistic (z-score) is calculated by subtracting the two sample proportions and dividing by the standard error:

Z = (p1 - p2) / SE

Z = (0.12 - 0.1133) / 0.0319

Z ≈ 0.2103

Therefore, the appropriate test statistic for this test is approximately 0.2103 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Learn more about decimals here: brainly.com/question/30958821

#SPJ11

Answer:

  2 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

You can use the relation ...

  time = distance / speed

  time = (16 mi)/(8 mi/h) = (16/8) h = 2 h

Brian biked for 2 hours yesterday.

Answer:

2 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is 8,000 k/cm³

The linear equation of the line is y = 34x -  7 and y + 7 = 34(x - 0)

The slope is given as:

m = 34

The y-intercept is given as:

c = -7

A linear equation in slope intercept form is represented as:

y = mx + c

So, we have:

y = 34x -  7

The equation in point slope form is calculated as follows:

y = 34x -  7

Add 7 to both sides

y + 7 = 34x

Express 34x as 34(x)

y + 7 = 34(x)

Subtract 0 from x

y + 7 = 34(x - 0)

Hence, the linear equation of the line is y = 34x -  7 and y + 7 = 34(x - 0)

Read more about linear equation at:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ9

The two percentages do not agree. Hence, option D is correct.

a) The mean time was 103.59 seconds, with a standard deviation of 5.16 seconds. If the Normal model is appropriate, the percentage of times that will be less than 98.43 seconds can be calculated as follows:

z = (x - μ) / σz = (98.43 - 103.59) / 5.16z = -1.00Using z-score table, we can determine that the percentage of times that will be less than 98.43 seconds is approximately 15%.

Therefore, the percentage of times that will be less than 98.43 seconds is 15%.

(Round to the nearest integer as needed)Hence, option A is correct.b) The actual percentage of times less than 98.43 seconds can be calculated by finding the number of competitors that finished with a time less than 98.43 seconds and dividing that number by the total number of competitors.

98.06, 98.09, 98.46, 98.47, 98.96, 98, 99, 99.12, 99.35, 99.57, 99.98, 100.08, 100.11, 100.28, 100.64, 101.32, 101.06, 101.25, 101.34, 101.39, 102.48,

101.99, 103.01, 103.87, 104.11, 103.64, 104.15, 104.27, 104.37, 104.33, 104.52, 105.47, 105.48, 105.69, 105.61, 113.02, 105.73, 109.65, 106.92, 116.11, 117.43, 117.59, 99.09, 100.67, 103.12, 105.02, 114.55, 99.11, 100.77, 103.18, 105.39, 115.97

There are no competitors who finished with a time less than 98.43 seconds. Therefore, the actual percentage of times less than 98.43 seconds is 0%. (Round to one decimal place as needed)Thus, option D is correct.c) The two percentages do agree.

This is because the Normal probability plot shows that the Normal model is not appropriate.

Therefore, the actual percentage of times less than 98.43 seconds is 0%, which is different from the percentage that was calculated using the Normal model. Since the Normal model is not appropriate, the actual percentage of times is more accurate.

To learn more about : percentages

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ8

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the slope

m = ( y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = ( 4-1)/(-2- -3)

    = (4-1)/(-2+3)

    = 3/1

   = 3

Point slope form is

( y-y1)= m(x-x1)

using the first point

y-1 = 3( x--3)

y-1 = 3(x+3)

using the second point

y-4 = 3(x - -2)

y-4 = 3(x +2)

Slope intercept  form is

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

y = 3x+b

Substituting a point into the equation

4 = 3(-2) +b

4 = -6 +b

Add 6 to each side

4+6 = b

10 =b

y = 3x+10

Answer: I just know that the slope would be 3. hope this helped :)

Slope intercept-y=3x+10

Step-by-step explanation:

4 minus 1/negative 2 minus negative 3

Then it makes it 3.

The first term of the given sequence is -2, and the common difference between consecutive terms is -7.

To find the first term and the common difference of the sequence -2, -9, -16, -23, ..., we observe the pattern in the sequence. Each term is obtained by subtracting 7 from the previous term.

The first term, denoted as a₁, is -2, which is the starting value of the sequence.

To find the common difference, we look at the difference between consecutive terms. The second term, -9, is obtained by subtracting 7 from the first term. Similarly, the third term, -16, is obtained by subtracting 7 from the second term, and so on.

Therefore, we can see that the common difference, denoted as d, is -7, as each term in the sequence is obtained by subtracting 7 from the previous term.

In conclusion, the first term of the sequence is -2, and the common difference between consecutive terms is -7.

Learn more about sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3)8-13x

4)10b-9

5)4x-2

6)-4a-4