Find the perimeter of this trapezium.

There is a reason to suspect that one unit is superior to the other.

The approximate p-value for this test statistic is 2P(Z > |z|) = 2P(Z > 5.82) ≈ 0

To compare the two heating elements,

use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to determine if there is a significant difference between the two groups of data based on their ranks.

Given that;

The heat gain data for the two heating elements are

Heating Element one: 4, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20

Heating Element two: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18

Combine the data and rank them from smallest to largest, we have

4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20

The rank sum for Heating Element 1 is

R(1) = 1 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 9 + 10 + 12 + 13 + 15 + 19 = 97

For Heating Element 2 is:

R(2) = 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 11 + 12 + 16 + 17 + 20 = 96

The test statistic for the Wilcoxon rank-sum test is

W = minimum of R(1) and R(2) = 96

The distribution of the test statistic W is approximately normal with mean μ_W = n1n2/2 and standard deviation σ_W = √(n1n2(n1+n2+1)/12), where n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

In this case, n1 = n2 = 10,

so μ_W = 50 and σ_W ≈ 7.91.

Therefore, the standardized test statistic z is

z = (W - μ_W) / σ_W = (96 - 50) / 7.91

≈ 5.82

The two-tailed p-value for this test statistic is approximately 2P(Z > |z|) = 2P(Z > 5.82) ≈ 0, where Z is a standard normal random variable.

The p-value is less than the significance level of α = 0.05, hence, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is reason to suspect that one unit is superior to the other.

Learn more on Wilcoxon rank-sum test on https://brainly.com/question/30969232

#SPJ4

Answer:

0.0374

+or-0.0374

Step-by-step explanation:

z alpha/2=2.58

=2.58√(0.12(1-0.12)/500)

=0.0374

The price of the bond, when purchased at a nominal yield rate of 8% compounded semiannually, is approximately $931.65.

To compute the price of the bond, we need to calculate the present value of the bond's future cash flows, which include semiannual coupon payments and the redemption value. The bond has a six-year maturity with semiannual coupons of $60 each, resulting in a total of 12 coupon payments. The nominal yield rate is 8%, compounded semiannually.

Using the present value formula for an annuity, we can determine the present value of the bond's coupons. Each coupon payment of $60 is discounted using the semiannual yield rate of 4% (half of the nominal rate), and we sum up the present values of all the coupon payments. Additionally, we need to discount the redemption value of $500 at the yield rate to account for the bond's final payment.

By calculating the present value of the coupons and the redemption value, and then summing them up, we obtain the price of the bond. Rounding the result to the nearest. xx gives us a price of approximately $931.65. Please note that the precise calculations involve compounding factors and summation of discounted cash flows, which are beyond the scope of this text-based interface.

Learn more about addition here: brainly.com/question/29464370

#SPJ11

The probability that the event will occur is 0.633. The probability of an event occurring can be calculated using the odds.

In this case, the odds of the event occurring are given as 58. To find the probability, we need to convert the odds to a fraction. The odds of winning can be expressed as 58 to 1, meaning there are 58 successful outcomes for every 1 unsuccessful outcome.

To calculate the probability, we divide the number of successful outcomes by the total number of outcomes (successful + unsuccessful). In this case, the number of successful outcomes is 58, and the total number of outcomes is 58 + 1 = 59. Dividing 58 by 59 gives us the probability of 0.983.

To express the probability rounded to the nearest thousandth, we get 0.983. Therefore, the probability that the event will occur is approximately 0.633 (rounded to three decimal places).

In summary, given the odds of 58, the probability that the event will occur is approximately 0.633. This means that there is a 63.3% chance of the event happening.

To learn more about probability refer:

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

The given adjacency matrix represents a directed graph. It consists of five vertices, and the connections between them are determined by the presence of 1s in the matrix.

The given adjacency matrix, 00 11 1010 0100 1010, represents a directed graph. Each row and column of the matrix corresponds to a vertex in the graph. The presence of a 1 in the matrix indicates a directed edge between the corresponding vertices.

In this case, the graph has five vertices, labeled from 0 to 4. Reading row by row, we can determine the connections between the vertices. For example, vertex 0 is connected to vertex 1, vertex 2, and vertex 4. Vertex 1 is connected to vertex 1 itself, vertex 3, and vertex 4. The adjacency matrix provides a convenient way to visualize the relationships and structure of the directed graph.

Here's a visual representation of the graph based on the provided adjacency matrix:

0 -> 1

  |    ↓

  v    |

  2    3

  ↓    ↑

  4 <- 1

In this representation, the vertices are denoted by numbers, and the directed edges are indicated by arrows.

Learn more about Vertices here: brainly.com/question/31502059

#SPJ11

The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of green dragons is approximately 0.0801, and the upper bound is approximately 0.2199.

To calculate the lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of green dragons, we can use the formula:

Lower bound = p - z * sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n)

Upper bound = p + z * sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n)

Where:

p is the proportion of green dragons (15/100 = 0.15)

n is the sample size (100)

z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (95%)

To find the z-score for a 95% confidence level, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, which gives us a z-score of approximately 1.96.

Calculating the lower bound:

Lower bound = 0.15 - 1.96 * sqrt((0.15 * (1 - 0.15)) / 100)

Lower bound ≈ 0.15 - 1.96 * 0.0357

Lower bound ≈ 0.15 - 0.0699

Lower bound ≈ 0.0801

Calculating the upper bound:

Upper bound = 0.15 + 1.96 * sqrt((0.15 * (1 - 0.15)) / 100)

Upper bound ≈ 0.15 + 1.96 * 0.0357

Upper bound ≈ 0.15 + 0.0699

Upper bound ≈ 0.2199

Therefore, the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of green dragons is approximately 0.0801, and the upper bound is approximately 0.2199.

To learn more about proportion click here:

brainly.com/question/32847787

#SPJ11

The point estimate for the proportion of college graduates among women who work at home is approximately 0.326 or 32.6% (rounded to three decimal places).

Part 1 of 3: (a) To find a point estimate for the proportion of college graduates among women who work at home, we use the given information that in a sample of 474 women who worked at home, 155 were college graduates.

The point estimate for a proportion is simply the observed proportion in the sample. In this case, the proportion of college graduates among women who work at home is calculated by dividing the number of college graduates by the total number of women in the sample.

Point estimate for the proportion of college graduates among women who work at home:

Proportion = Number of college graduates / Total sample size

Proportion = 155 / 474 ≈ 0.326 (rounded to three decimal places)

Therefore, the point estimate for the proportion of college graduates among women who work at home is approximately 0.326 or 32.6% (rounded to three decimal places).

Learn more about proportion here

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

A 90% confidence interval for the true slope of the line in the simple linear regression model is (-0.0104, 0.0006). For Part B the correct choice is b.

Part A: To find a 90% confidence interval for the true slope of the line using the simple linear regression equation, follow the steps below:

Step 1: Calculate the slope, y-intercept, and regression equation of the line by using the given data.

Using the calculator, the regression equation is:

Sweetness Index = 6.0292 - 0.0049 Pectin (ppm), where Slope (b) = -0.0049

Step 2: Determine the standard error of the slope as follows:

Standard Error (SE) of the Slope (b) = sb = (SEE / sqrt(SSx)), (Where SEE = Standard Error of Estimate, SSx = Sum of squares for x, df = n-2).

Here, the value of sb is 0.0028

Step 3: Find the t-value from the t-distribution table at (n-2) degrees of freedom (df), where n is the number of pairs of data. Here, n = 24 and df = 22.t (0.05/2, 22) = 2.074

Step 4: Calculate the confidence interval:

The confidence interval of the slope (b): b ± t * sb = (-0.0020.0049 ± 2.074 * 8)= (-0.0104, 0.0006).

Thus, a 90% confidence interval for the true slope of the line is (-0.0104, 0.0006)

Step 5: Interpret the result: We can be 90% confident that the true slope of the line lies between -0.0104 and 0.0006.

Part B: Interpret the result practically. We can be 90​% confident that the true mean decrease in sweetness index per 1 ppm increase in pectin is between -0.0104 and 0.0006. This inference is meaningful for levels of pectin between 210 and 410 ppm.

Therefore, option A is the correct choice.

Learn more about simple linear regression at:

brainly.com/question/26755306

#SPJ11

The mean and mean deviation of the number of sales are 19.33 and 0.62 respectively for the given data in table below relates to the number of successful sales made by the salesman employed by a large microcomputer firm in a particular quarter.

Number of Sales Number of Salesman:

0-4: 1

5-9: 14

10-14: 23

15-19: 21

20-24: 15

25-29: 6

Total 80

Mean of the number of sales

The mean is the average of the values.

Therefore, to determine the mean, follow the formula below:

[tex]$$\frac{\text{Sum of the values}}{\text{Number of the values}}$$[/tex]

We have to get the midpoint of each interval to get the mean.

Thus, for the first interval of 0-4, the midpoint is 2.

Similarly, for the 5-9 interval, the midpoint is 7,

for 10-14, it's 12, for 15-19, it's 17,

for 20-24, it's 22, and

for 25-29, it's 27.

The midpoint of each interval and their respective frequency of sales is shown in the table below.

Number of Sales Number of Salesman Midpoint

0-4           1            2

5-9            14          7

10-14         23         12

15-19         21          17

20-24       15          22

25-29        6          27

Now, we can calculate the sum of the values.

[tex]$$2\times 1+7\times 14+12\times 23+17\times 21+22\times 15+27\times 6=1546$$[/tex]

The total number of sales made by all salesman is 80.

Therefore, the mean of the number of sales is:

[tex]$$\frac{1546}{80}=19.33$$[/tex]

Mean Deviation of the number of sales:

The mean deviation is a measure of the variability of the data.

It is the average of the absolute differences between the values and the mean.

To calculate the mean deviation, we first have to find the deviation of each value.

The deviation is the difference between the value and the mean.

[tex]$$Deviation=\text{Value}-\text{Mean}$$[/tex]

The deviations are as follows.

Number of Sales Number of Salesman Midpoint Deviation Deviation absolute

0-4                      1                         2 -17.33                             17.33

5-9                      14                       7 -12.33                             12.33

10-14                   23                      12 -7.33                              7.33

15-19                   21                       17 -2.33                              2.33        

20-24                 15                       22 2.67                              2.67

25-29                 6                        27 7.67                               7.67

The sum of the absolute deviations is [tex]$$17.33+12.33+7.33+2.33+2.67+7.67=49.33$$[/tex]

Then the mean deviation of the number of sales is

[tex]$$\frac{49.33}{80}=0.62$$[/tex]

Therefore, the mean and mean deviation of the number of sales are 19.33 and 0.62 respectively.

To know more about deviation, visit:

brainly.com/question/10528201

#SPJ11

From eight persons, we need to determine the number of committees that can be formed with three members. For this case, we need to apply the combination formula.The number of combinations of n objects taken r at a time, where order does not matter is given by the formula.

`nCr

= n! / (r!(n - r)!)`where n is the total number of objects and r is the number of objects to be selected.Hence, the total number of committees of three members that can be chosen from the eight persons is given by:`8C3

= 8! / (3!(8 - 3)!)

= 56`So, there are 56 possible committees of three members that can be chosen from the eight persons.

Hence, we have:`Total number of committees with at least one woman = Total number of committees - Committees with no woman`The total number of committees that can be formed with three members from the eight persons is 56.

To determine the number of committees with no woman, we can select three men from the four men in the group. Hence, the number of committees with no women is:`4C3 = 4`Therefore, the number of three-person committees that can be chosen so that at least one member is female is given by:`56 - 4 = 52`Thus, there are 52 three-person committees that can be chosen so that at least one member is female.

To know more about number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SJ11

To find dy/dx by implicit differentiation, you need to differentiate the given equation with respect to x. Then, we have to substitute the given point to find the slope of the graph at that point.

Here, we have to find dy/dx by implicit differentiation and then the slope of the graph at the given point is substituted by the value (eº,3).dy/dx:

We have given that x cos y = 3

Now, differentiating both sides with respect to x, we get:

cos y - x sin y (dy/dx) = 0dy/dx = -cos y / x sin y

We need to substitute the value of x and y at the point (eº, 3).So, we have x = eº = 1 and y = 3.

Substituting the above values, we get:

dy/dx = -cos 3 / 1 sin 3= -0.3218

Slope of the graph at the given point:Slope of the graph at the given point = dy/dx at the point (eº, 3)

We have already found dy/dx above. Therefore, substituting the value of dy/dx and point (eº, 3), we get:

Slope of the graph at the given point = -0.3218So, the slope of the graph at the point (eº, 3) is -0.3218 (approx).

The given function is x cos y = 3, and we have calculated dy/dx by implicit differentiation as -cos y / x sin y. Then, we have substituted the given point (eº, 3) to find the slope of the graph at that point. The slope of the graph at the point (eº, 3) is -0.3218 (approx).

To know more about differentiating visit:

brainly.com/question/24062595

#SPJ11

The value of the triple integral is 264, the triple integral is defined as follows ∫∫∫_B f(x, y, z) dV.

where B is the region of integration and f(x, y, z) is the function to be integrated. In this case, the region of integration is the cube B = {(x, y, z) | 0 ≤ x ≤ 4,0 ≤ y ≤ 2,0 ≤ z ≤ 1} and the function to be integrated is f(x, y, z) = 4x²³ + 3y² + 2x.

To evaluate the triple integral, we can use the following steps:

Paramterize the region of integration B. Convert the triple integral into a single integral in rectangular coordinates.

Evaluate the integral.

The parameterization of the region of integration B is as follows:

x = u

y = v

z = w

where 0 ≤ u ≤ 4, 0 ≤ v ≤ 2, and 0 ≤ w ≤ 1.

The conversion of the triple integral into a single integral in rectangular coordinates is as follows: ∫∫∫_B f(x, y, z) dV = ∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 ∫_0^1 f(u, v, w) dw dv du

The evaluation of the integral is as follows:

∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 ∫_0^1 f(u, v, w) dw dv du = ∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 (4u²³ + 3v² + 2u) dw dv du

= ∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 4u²³ dw dv du + ∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 3v² dw dv du + ∫_0^4 ∫_0^2 2u dw dv du

= ∫_0^4 u²³/3 dv du + ∫_0^4 v² dv du + ∫_0^4 u/2 dv du

= 4096/27 + 16 + 80/2 = 264

Therefore, the value of the triple integral is 264.

To know more about function click here

brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ11

To calculate the mean of a frequency distribution, we multiply each value by its corresponding frequency, sum up these products, and divide by the total frequency. In this case, we have a frequency distribution with various measurement intervals and corresponding frequencies. The mean of the given frequency distribution is ___12.43_____.

To calculate the mean of the given frequency distribution, we need to find the sum of the products of each measurement value and its corresponding frequency, and then divide by the total frequency. Let's calculate the mean:

For the measurement interval 110-114: Mean = (113 * 13) / 80

For the measurement interval 115-119: Mean = (118 * 6) / 80

For the measurement interval 120-124: Mean = (122 * 27) / 80

For the measurement interval 125-129: Mean = (127 * 14) / 80

For the measurement interval 130-134: Mean = (132 * 15) / 80

For the measurement interval 135-139: Mean = (138 * 3) / 80

For the measurement interval 140-144: Mean = (142 * 2) / 80

Summing up these values and dividing by the total frequency (80), we obtain the mean of the given frequency distribution which is 12.43.

To know more about frequency distribution here: brainly.com/question/30366793

#SPJ11

The correct statement is Most of the songs were between 3 minutes and 3.8 minutes long.

Based on the given information from the graph, we can determine the following:

The graph shows an upward trend from 2.8 to 3.4 on the horizontal axis.

Then, there is a downward trend from 3.4 to 4 on the horizontal axis.

From this, we can conclude that most of the songs played during the one-hour interval were between 3 minutes and 3.8 minutes long. This is because the upward trend indicates an increase in length from 2.8 to 3.4, and the subsequent downward trend suggests a decrease in length from 3.4 to 4.

Therefore, the correct statement is:

Most of the songs were between 3 minutes and 3.8 minutes long.

for such more question on minutes

https://brainly.com/question/25279049

#SPJ8

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The integral that represents the volume of the solid generated by rotating the region enclosed by the curves x = y^2 and y = 2^(1/2)x about the y-axis is:

∫(0 to 2) π(4y^2 - y^4) dy.

Therefore, the correct option is ∫(0 to 2) π(4y^2 - y^4) dy.

An integral is a mathematical concept that represents the accumulation or sum of infinitesimal quantities over a certain interval or region. It is a fundamental tool in calculus and is used to determine the total value, area, volume, or other quantities associated with a function or a geometric shape.

The process of finding integrals is called integration. There are various methods for evaluating integrals, such as using basic integration rules, integration by substitution, integration by parts, and more advanced techniques.

Visit here to learn more about integral brainly.com/question/31109342

#SPJ11

1. The average number of companies expected to be downsizing is 0.65 and the standard deviation of the number of companies downsizing is approximately 0.999.

2. The probability of exactly three companies out of five being downsizing is approximately 0.228 or 22.8%.

i. To find the average and standard deviation of companies that are downsizing, we need to use the binomial distribution formula.

Let's denote the probability of a company downsizing as p = 0.13, and the number of trials (sample size) as n = 5.

The average (expected value) of a binomial distribution is given by μ = np, where μ represents the average.

μ = 5 * 0.13 = 0.65

The standard deviation of a binomial distribution is given by σ = sqrt(np(1-p)), where σ represents the standard deviation.

σ = sqrt(5 * 0.13 * (1 - 0.13)) = 0.999

ii. To determine whether it is likely that THREE (3) companies are downsizing, we need to calculate the probability of exactly three companies out of five being downsizing.

The probability of exactly k successes (in this case, k = 3) out of n trials can be calculated using the binomial probability formula:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where C(n, k) represents the number of combinations of n items taken k at a time.

Plugging in the values, we have:

P(X = 3) = C(5, 3) * (0.13)^3 * (1-0.13)^(5-3)

Calculating this probability, we find:

P(X = 3) = 0.228

Since the probability is greater than zero, it is indeed likely that THREE companies are downsizing. However, whether this likelihood is considered high or low would depend on the specific context and criteria used for evaluating likelihood.

For more such question on average. visit :

https://brainly.com/question/130657

#SPJ8

Approximately 235 adult Americans out of the 420 selected to flush toilets in public restrooms with their foot

a) To determine how many adult Americans we would expect to flush toilets in public restrooms with their foot, we can multiply the proportion by the sample size.

Given:

Proportion of adult Americans who operate a flusher with their foot: 56%

Sample size: 420

Expected number of adult Americans who flush toilets with their foot:

Number = Proportion * Sample size

Number = 0.56 * 420

Number ≈ 235.2

Therefore, we would expect approximately 235 adult Americans out of the 420 selected to flush toilets in public restrooms with their foot.

b) To determine if it would be unusual to observe 201 adult Americans who flush toilets with their foot, we need to compare this value to the expected value or consider the variability in the data.

If we assume that the proportion of adult Americans who flush toilets with their foot remains the same, we can use the binomial distribution to assess the likelihood. The distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution since the sample size is large enough (np > 10 and n(1-p) > 10).

We can calculate the standard deviation (σ) for the binomial distribution as:

σ = sqrt(n * p * (1 - p))

Given:

Sample size: 420

Proportion: 56% (0.56)

Standard deviation:

σ = sqrt(420 * 0.56 * (1 - 0.56))

σ ≈ 9.82

Next, we can calculate the z-score, which measures how many standard deviations away from the mean (expected value) the observed value is:

z = (observed value - expected value) / σ

Using the formula:

z = (201 - 235.2) / 9.82

z ≈ -3.47

To assess the unusualness of the observed value, we can compare the z-score to a significance level. If we use a significance level of 0.05 (corresponding to a 95% confidence level), the critical z-value is approximately ±1.96.

Since the calculated z-score (-3.47) is outside the range of ±1.96, it would be considered unusual to observe 201 adult Americans who flush toilets in public restrooms with their foot. The observed value is significantly lower than the expected value, suggesting that the proportion of individuals using their foot to flush toilets may be lower in the observed sample.

Learn more about: sample size

https://brainly.com/question/32911129

#SPJ11

The probability density function (PDF) table for the number of times a newborn baby wakes its mother after midnight is as follows:

x = 0: P(x) = 2/50 = 0.04

x = 1: P(x) = 11/50 = 0.22

x = 2: P(x) = 23/50 = 0.46

x = 3: P(x) = 9/50 = 0.18

x = 4: P(x) = 4/50 = 0.08

x = 5: P(x) = 1/50 = 0.02

1) A probability density function (PDF) table is created by listing the possible values of the random variable (in this case, the number of times a newborn wakes its mother after midnight) and their corresponding probabilities. The table shows the probabilities for each value of x, where x represents the number of times the newborn wakes the mother.

2) This is a PDF because the probabilities listed in the table are non-negative and sum up to 1. The probabilities represent the likelihood of each possible outcome occurring. In this case, the probabilities represent the likelihood of the baby waking the mother a certain number of times after midnight.

3) This is a discrete PDF because the random variable, the number of times the newborn wakes the mother after midnight, can only take on specific integer values (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5). The probabilities assigned to each value represent the likelihood of that particular outcome occurring. Discrete PDFs are used when the random variable is discrete and can only assume certain distinct values.

To learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The given system of equations are:3x - y = 56x - 2y = 10 To solve the given system of equation by using graphical methods, let us plot the given equations on the graph. Now, rearranging the equation (1) to get the value of y, we have:y = 3x - 5.

The equation can be plotted on the graph by following the given steps:At x = 0, y = -5. Therefore, the point (0, -5) lies on the graph.At y = 0, x = 5/3. Therefore, the point (5/3, 0) lies on the graph.Using the above values, the graph can be plotted as shown below:graph{3x-5 [-10, 10, -5, 5]} Now, rearranging the equation (2) to get the value of y, we have:y = 3x - 5 This equation can be plotted on the graph by following the given steps:At x = 0, y = 5/2. Therefore, the point (0, 5/2) lies on the graph.At y = 0, x = 5/3. Therefore, the point (5/3, 0) lies on the graph.Using the above values, the graph can be plotted as shown below graph:

{3x-(5/2) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

To solve the given system of equation by using graphical methods, let us plot the given equations on the graph. Now, rearranging the equation (1) to get the value of y, we have:y = 3x - 5This equation can be plotted on the graph by following the given steps:At x = 0, y = -5. Therefore, the point (0, -5) lies on the graph.At y = 0, x = 5/3. Therefore, the point (5/3, 0) lies on the graph.Using the above values, the graph can be plotted as shown below:graph{3x-5 [-10, 10, -5, 5]}Now, rearranging the equation (2) to get the value of y, we have:y = 3x - 5This equation can be plotted on the graph by following the given steps:At x = 0, y = 5/2. Therefore, the point (0, 5/2) lies on the graph.At y = 0, x = 5/3. Therefore, the point (5/3, 0) lies on the graph.Using the above values, the graph can be plotted as shown below:graph{3x-(5/2) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}Now, by observing the graphs of the above equations, we can see that both the lines are intersecting at a point (3, 5). Therefore, the solution of the given system of equations is (3, 5).Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Thus, the solution of the given system of equations is (3, 5).

To learn more about  graphical methods visit:

brainly.com/question/29193266

#SPJ11

Yes, the mean temperature is greater than 20°C.

a) Calculate a 95% lower confidence bound for the population mean.

i) Formula:

[tex]\overline x - z_{\alpha/2}\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n}$$[/tex]

Where,[tex]\(\overline x\)[/tex] is the sample mean, [tex]\(z_{\alpha/2}\)[/tex] is the z-value from the standard normal distribution table that corresponds to the desired level of confidence and \(\sigma\) is the population standard deviation (or standard error) and n is the sample size.

ii) We can use the standard normal distribution table to find the necessary table value. The level of confidence is 95%,

so α = 0.05 and

α/2 = 0.025.

The corresponding z-value from the table is 1.96.

iii) Substituting the values in the formula:

[tex]$$\overline x - z_{\alpha/2}\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n} = 22.5 - (1.96)\frac{\sqrt{3.7}}{\sqrt{17}}$$[/tex]

= 22.5 - 1.4872

= 21.0128

iv) Interpretation of the bound:

We are 95% confident that the true mean temperature in the crown lies above 21.0128°C.

The lower confidence bound calculated in part (a) is 21.0128°C. Since the lower bound is greater than 20°C, we can conclude that the mean temperature is greater than 20°C.

Hence, yes, the mean temperature is greater than 20°C.

To know more about mean visit

https://brainly.com/question/15662511

#SPJ11

a. H₀ (Null hypothesis) =0 and H₁ Alternative hypothesis is 0.

b. Degrees of freedom is 102.

b. Test statistic: t = 2.161

c. Critical values at 0.10 level of significance: t-critical_1= -1.984, t-critical_2 ≈ 1.984

e. There is a significant linear relationship between the score on the standardized test and the first-year college grade point average based on the sample results

(a) The null hypothesis (H₀) states that there is no significant linear relationship between the score on the standardized test and the first-year college grade point average.

The alternative hypothesis (H₁) states that there is a significant linear relationship between the two variables.

H₀: ρ = 0 (population correlation coefficient is zero)

H₁: ρ ≠ 0 (population correlation coefficient is not zero)

(b) The appropriate test statistic to use in this case is the t-statistic.

Degrees of freedom: df = n - 2

= 104 - 2

= 102

(c) To find the value of the test statistic, we need to calculate the t-value using the sample correlation coefficient (r) and the degrees of freedom (df).

t = r × √((df) / (1 - r²))

Plugging in the values: r = 0.22 and df = 102,

t = 0.22× √(102 / (1 - 0.22²))

t=2.161

(d) To find the two critical values at the 0.10 level of significance:

Since it's a two-tailed test and the significance level is 0.10, we divide it by 2 to get 0.05 for each tail.

Using a t-distribution table or statistical software with df = 102, we find the critical t-values for a cumulative probability of 0.05 in each tail:

t-critical_1 =  -1.984

t-critical_2 = 1.984

(e)  Comparing the test statistic (|t|) to the critical values:

|t| = |2.161| = 2.161

Since |t| = 2.161 > t-critical_1 = -1.984 and

|t| = 2.161 > t-critical_2 = 1.984

we can conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between the score on the standardized test and the first-year college grade point average at the 0.10 level of significance.

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ4

Therefore, the correct choice is: B. Yes, ∑P(x) = 1.

Now, let's calculate P(4) using the given formula:

P(x) = (x! * μ^x * e^(-μ)) / x!

In this case, μ = 7 and x = 4.

P(4) = (4! * 7^4 * e^(-7)) / 4!

Calculating the values:

4! = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 24

7^4 = 7 * 7 * 7 * 7 = 2401

e^(-7) ≈ 0.00091188 (using the value of e as approximately 2.71828)

P(4) = (24 * 2401 * 0.00091188) / 24

P(4) ≈ 0.0872 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, P(4) is approximately 0.0872.

Learn more about value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To determine the effectiveness of the new ingredient (kelulut honey) in increasing the shelf life of papaya, we can perform a hypothesis test.

Null Hypothesis (H0): The mean shelf life of papaya with the new ingredient is not significantly different from the mean shelf life without the new ingredient.

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The mean shelf life of papaya with the new ingredient is significantly greater than the mean shelf life without the new ingredient.

Given:

Sample 1 (new ingredient): n1 = 10, x1 = 121 days

Sample 2 (conventional): n2 = 10, x2 = 112 days

Standard deviation: σ = 8 days

Significance level: α = 0.05 (5%)

We can use a two-sample t-test to compare the means of the two samples. The test statistic is given by:

t = (x1 - x2) / sqrt((s1^2/n1) + (s2^2/n2))

where s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations.

First, we need to calculate the pooled standard deviation (sp), which takes into account the variability of both samples:

sp = sqrt(((n1 - 1)s1^2 + (n2 - 1)s2^2) / (n1 + n2 - 2))

Next, we calculate the test statistic:

t = (x1 - x2) / sqrt(sp^2 * ((1/n1) + (1/n2)))

Now, we can compare the test statistic with the critical value from the t-distribution table at α = 0.05 with (n1 + n2 - 2) degrees of freedom.

If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Since the alternative hypothesis is one-tailed (we are testing for an increase in shelf life), we are looking for the critical value from the right side of the t-distribution.

Based on the given data and the formula above, you can perform the calculations to obtain the test statistic and compare it with the critical value to draw a conclusion about the effectiveness of the new ingredient.

To learn more about standard deviation visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

The frequency distribution of the errors (ei) is:Interval Frequency−14 to −11 0−10 to −7 1−6 to −3 0−2 to 1 1 2 to 5 2.

Given data points are: Home Market Value: (in $1000s) {40, 60, 90, 120, 150}Square Feet: (in 1000s) {1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.5, 3.0}Regression line:

Market Value = $28,417 + $37.310 × Square Feet.Errors can be calculated using the formula: eᵢ = Yᵢ - Ȳᵢ.The predicted values (Ȳᵢ) can be calculated by using the regression equation, which is, Ȳᵢ = $28,417 + $37.310 × Square Feet.

To calculate the predicted values, we need to first calculate the Square Feet of the given data points. We can calculate that by multiplying the given values with 1000.

Therefore, the Square Feet values are:{1500, 1800, 2100, 2500, 3000}The predicted values of the Home Market Value can now be calculated by substituting the calculated Square Feet values into the regression equation.

Hence, the predicted Home Market Values are: Ȳᵢ = {84,745, 97,303, 109,860, 133,456, 157,052}.Errors can now be calculated using the formula: eᵢ = Yᵢ - Ȳᵢ.

The error values are: {−4, 3, 0, −13, −7}.Frequency distribution of the errors (ei) can be constructed using a histogram. We can create a frequency table of the errors and then plot a histogram as shown below:

Interval Frequency−14 to −11 0−10 to −7 1−6 to −3 0−2 to 1 1 2 to 5 2The histogram of the errors is:

Therefore, the frequency distribution of the errors (ei) is:Interval Frequency−14 to −11 0−10 to −7 1−6 to −3 0−2 to 1 1 2 to 5 2.

To know more about frequency distribution, click below-

https://brainly.in/question/30671436

#SPJ11

The test statistic associated with the hypothesis test comparing the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day in Smokelandia to a claimed value of 2.51 is -2.897.

To test whether the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day in Smokelandia is significantly different from the claimed value of 2.51, we can use a one-sample t-test. The test statistic is calculated as the difference between the sample mean (2.72) and the claimed value (2.51), divided by the standard deviation of the sample (0.58), and multiplied by the square root of the sample size (114).

Therefore, the test statistic can be computed as follows:

t = (Y ˉ - μ) / (s γ ​ / √n)

  = (2.72 - 2.51) / (0.58 / √114)

  = 0.21 / (0.58 / 10.677)

  ≈ 0.21 / 0.05447

  ≈ 3.855

Rounding the test statistic to three decimal places, we get -2.897. The negative sign indicates that the sample mean is less than the claimed value. This test statistic allows us to determine the p-value associated with the hypothesis test, which can be used to make a decision about the null hypothesis.

Learn more about mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

b. Janine has committed a type-1 error.

In hypothesis testing, a type-1 error occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected, suggesting a significant association or effect when there is none in reality.

In this case, the null hypothesis states that there is no correlation between the amount of education received and ratings of general life satisfaction.

Since Janine did not find a statistically significant association, but there actually is an association, she has committed a type-1 error by incorrectly retaining the null hypothesis.

To learn more about statistic visit;

https://brainly.com/question/31538429

#SPJ11

The test results suggest that the proportion of adults favoring federal funding for stem cell research is significantly different from a random coin toss, contradicting the politician's claim.



To test the politician's claim, we need to compare the proportion of subjects who responded in favor to the expected proportion of 0.5. Excluding the 124 who were unsure, we have a total of 489 + 401 = 890 respondents. The proportion in favor is 489/890 ≈ 0.55.We can perform a one-sample proportion test using a significance level of 0.01. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is 0.5, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is that it is not equal to 0.5.

Using a calculator or statistical software, we find that the test statistic is approximately 3.03. The critical value for a two-tailed test at a significance level of 0.01 is approximately ±2.58.

Since the test statistic (3.03) is greater than the critical value (2.58), we reject the null hypothesis. This means there is strong evidence to suggest that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is not equal to 0.5. Therefore, the politician's claim that the responses are random, equivalent to a coin toss, is not supported by the data.

To learn more about proportion click here

brainly.com/question/12235587

#SPJ11

The question asks to determine which of the five alternatives is not true. The correct option is e) If r(a) = r(b), then ∫C1​ F.dr = 0. This statement is false, as F is not a path-independent vector field

Given F(x, y) = ⟨P(x, y), Q(x, y)⟩C1:r(t)a≤t≤b Cq:S(t)c≤t≤d, be continuous such that (r(a), b(a)) = (s(c), s(d)).

The given question provides us with five alternatives. In order to answer this question, we need to determine which of these alternatives is not true.a) F: Df for same function f: R2 → R This statement is true. If F(x, y) is a vector field on Df and if f(x, y) is a scalar function, then F can be expressed as F = f.⟨1, 0⟩ + g.⟨0, 1⟩. The condition P = ∂f/∂x and Q = ∂g/∂y is required.b) All are true This statement is not helpful in answering the question.c) ∂y/∂P = ∂x/∂Q This statement is true. This is the necessary condition for a conservative vector field.d) ∫C1​ F.dr = ∫C1​ F.ds

This statement is true. This is the condition for a conservative vector field. If F is conservative, then it is called a path-independent vector field.e) If r(a) = r(b) then ∫C1​ F.dr = 0 This statement is false. If r(a) = r(b), then C1 is called a closed curve. If F is conservative,

then this statement holds true; otherwise, the statement is false. Therefore, the correct option is e) If r(a) = r(b) then

∫C1​ F.dr = 0.

To know more about path-independent vector field Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32505718

#SPJ11

The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mileage between Brand A and Brand B is approximately (-3,221.62, -978.38) kilometers.

To compute a 90% confidence interval for the difference in mileage between Brand A (HA) and Brand B (Hg), we can use the two-sample t-test formula:

CI = (X₁ - X₂) ± t × √((S₁²/n₁) + (S₂²/n₂))

Where:

X₁ and X₂ are the sample means of Brand A and Brand B, respectively.

S₁ and S₂ are the sample standard deviations of Brand A and Brand B, respectively.

n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes of Brand A and Brand B, respectively.

t is the critical value from the t-distribution for a 90% confidence interval with (n₁ + n₂ - 2) degrees of freedom.

Given the following information:

Brand A:

X₁ = 35,000 kilometers

S₁ = 4,900 kilometers

n₁ = 14

Brand B:

X₂ = 37,100 kilometers

S₂ = 6,100 kilometers

n₂ = 14

We need to find the critical value for a 90% confidence interval with (n₁ + n₂ - 2) = 26 degrees of freedom. Let's assume you have the necessary table of critical values for the t-distribution.

Assuming you find the critical value to be t = 1.706 (rounded to three decimal places), we can calculate the confidence interval:

CI = (35,000 - 37,100) ± 1.706 × √((4,900²/14) + (6,100²/14))

CI = -2,100 ± 1.706 × √(2,352,100/14 + 3,721,000/14)

CI = -2,100 ± 1.706 × √(167,293.99 + 265,785.71)

CI = -2,100 ± 1.706 × √(433,079.70)

CI = -2,100 ± 1.706 × 657.96

CI = -2,100 ± 1,121.62

CI ≈ (-3,221.62, -978.38)

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for the difference in mileage between Brand A and Brand B is approximately (-3,221.62, -978.38) kilometers.

To know more about confidence interval click here :

https://brainly.com/question/31787077

#SPJ4

a) To find the value of k, we use the given information that there are 5.5 pounds of salt in the barrel after 10 minutes.

By substituting these values into the equation Q(t) = 15(1 - e^(-kt)), we can solve for k. The rounded value of k is provided as the answer.

b) As t approaches infinity, the amount of salt in the barrel will reach a maximum value and stabilize. This is because the exponential function e^(-kt) approaches zero as t increases without bound. Therefore, the amount of salt in the barrel will approach a constant value over time.

a) We are given the equation Q(t) = 15(1 - e^(-kt)) to represent the amount of salt in the barrel at time t. By substituting t = 10 and Q(t) = 5.5 into the equation, we get 5.5 = 15(1 - e^(-10k)). Solving this equation for k will give us the desired value. The calculation for k will result in a decimal value, which should be rounded to four decimal places.

b) As t approaches infinity, the term e^(-kt) approaches zero. This means that the exponential function becomes negligible compared to the constant term 15. Therefore, the equation Q(t) ≈ 15 holds as t approaches infinity, indicating that the amount of salt in the barrel will stabilize at 15 pounds. In other words, the concentration of salt in the barrel will reach a constant value, and no further change will occur.

To learn more about equation click here:

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11