First try was incorrect
The distance, y, in meters, of an object coasting for x seconds can be modeled by the following exponential equation:
4 = 266 - 266(0. 62)^x
how far does the object coast?

a. The height of a flying kite and the speed of the wind would show a positive correlation.

b. The time spent practicing shooting a basketball and the number of misses in 10 shots would show a negative correlation.

c. The length of a piece of string and the color of the string would show no correlation.

The height of a flying kite and the speed of the wind would show a positive correlation. As the wind speed increases, the kite is likely to fly higher. Conversely, if the wind speed decreases, the kite's height is likely to decrease as well. This positive correlation can be explained by the fact that a higher wind speed provides more lift and allows the kite to soar higher into the sky. Therefore, as the wind speed increases, the height of the kite also increases.

On the other hand, the time spent practicing shooting a basketball and the number of misses in 10 shots would show a negative correlation. With more practice, the player's skill and accuracy are expected to improve, resulting in a lower number of misses. Therefore, as the time spent practicing increases, the number of misses in 10 shots is likely to decrease. This negative correlation can be attributed to the assumption that increased practice leads to improved shooting skills and a reduced number of misses.

Lastly, the length of a piece of string and the color of the string would show no correlation. The length of a string does not have any inherent relationship with its color. Changing the length of a string will not affect its color, and vice versa. Therefore, there is no correlation between the length of a string and its color.

In summary, the height of a flying kite and the speed of the wind show a positive correlation, the time spent practicing shooting a basketball and the number of misses in 10 shots show a negative correlation, while the length of a piece of string and the color of the string show no correlation.

Learn more about correlation.

brainly.com/question/30116167

#SPJ11

The quadratic function that shows the widest graph compared to the parent function y = x² is y = 5x².

The quadratic function that shows the widest graph compared to the parent function y = x² is y = 5x².

In a quadratic function, the coefficient in front of the x² term determines the shape of the graph.

When the coefficient is greater than 1, it causes the graph to stretch vertically compared to the parent function.

Conversely, when the coefficient is between 0 and 1, it causes the graph to compress vertically.

Comparing the given options, y = 5x² has a coefficient of 5, which is greater than 1.

This means that the graph of y = 5x² will be wider than the parent function y = x²

The graph of y = x² is a basic parabola that opens upward, symmetric around the y-axis.

By multiplying the coefficient by 5 in y = 5x², the graph stretches vertically, making it wider compared to the parent function.

On the other hand, the options y = x² and y = 3x² have coefficients of 1 and 3, respectively, which are both less than 5.

Hence, they will not be as wide as y = 5x².

For similar question on  quadratic function.

https://brainly.com/question/29051300  

#SPJ8

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

To do this on a Ti-84 plus CE

Go to [Stats], click on [1: Edit], and enter {9, 16, 23, 30, 37, 44, 51} into L1

Click on [Stats] again, go to [Calc], and click on [1: 1-Var Stats]

Enter L1 as your List, put nothing for FreqList, and click Calculate

Your [tex]s_{x}[/tex] is your standard deviation if your data set is a sample (15.1).

Your σx is your standard deviation if your data set is a population (14).

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data set:

To find the standard deviation of a data set, first find the mean (average) of the data, by dividing the sum the data values by the number of data values:

[tex]\begin{aligned}\textsf{Mean}&=\dfrac{9+16+23+30+37+44+71}{7}\\\\&=\dfrac{210}{7}\\\\&=30\end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the mean of the data set is 30.

Calculate the square of the difference between each data point and the mean:

[tex](9 - 30)^2 = (-21)^2 = 441[/tex]

[tex](16 - 30)^2 = (-14)^2 = 196[/tex]

[tex](23 - 30)^2 = (-7)^2 = 49[/tex]

[tex](30 - 30)^2 = 0^2 = 0[/tex]

[tex](37 - 30)^2 = 7^2 = 49[/tex]

[tex](44 - 30)^2 = 14^2 = 196[/tex]

[tex](51 - 30)^2 = 21^2 = 441[/tex]

Find the mean of the squared differences:

[tex]\begin{aligned}\textsf{Mean of squared differences}&=\dfrac{441+196+49+0+49+196+441}{7}\\\\&=\dfrac{1372}{7}\\\\&=196\end{aligned}[/tex]

Finally, square root the mean of the squared differences to get the standard deviation:

[tex]\textsf{Standard deviation}=\sqrt{196}=14[/tex]

Therefore, the standard deviation of the given data set is 14.

Therefore,[tex]f(x) = 7/x^5[/tex] and g(x) = x - 10 are two nontrivial functions that satisfy the given equation [tex]f(g(x)) = 7/(x - 10)^5[/tex].

Let's find the correct functions f(x) and g(x) such that [tex]f(g(x)) = 7/(x - 10)^5[/tex].

Let's start by breaking down the expression [tex]7/(x - 10)^5[/tex]. We can rewrite it as[tex](7 * (x - 10)^(-5)).[/tex]

Now, we need to find functions f(x) and g(x) such that f(g(x)) equals the above expression. To do this, we can try to match the inner function g(x) first.

Let's set g(x) = x - 10. Now, when we substitute g(x) into f(x), we should get the desired expression.

Substituting g(x) into f(x), we have f(g(x)) = f(x - 10).

To match [tex]f(g(x)) = (7 * (x - 10)^(-5))[/tex], we can set [tex]f(x) = 7/x^5[/tex].

Therefore, the functions [tex]f(x) = 7/x^5[/tex] and g(x) = x - 10 satisfy the equation [tex]f(g(x)) = 7/(x - 10)^5.[/tex]

To know more about nontrivial functions,

https://brainly.com/question/31867461

#SPJ11

i. Connected bipartite graph with 6 labelled vertices and 6 edges is shown below:

Here, V1 = {a, c, e} and V2 = {b, d, f}.The corresponding relation rho⊂V1×V2 corresponding with the edges is as follows:

rho = {(a, b), (a, d), (c, b), (c, f), (e, d), (e, f)}.

  a -- 1 -- b

 /              \

f - 2            5 - d

 \              /

  c -- 3 -- e

ii. Let A be a set of six elements and σ an equivalence relation on A such that the resulting partition is {{a,c,d},{b,e},{f}}. The directed graph corresponding with σ on A is shown below:

a --> c --> d

↑     ↑

|     |

b --> e

↑

|

f

iii. A directed graph with 5 vertices and 10 edges representing a relation rho that is reflexive and antisymmetric, but not symmetric or transitive is shown below:

Here, the relation rho is reflexive and antisymmetric but not transitive. This is identified from the graph as follows:

Reflexive: There are self-loops on each vertex.

Antisymmetric: No two vertices have arrows going in both directions.

Transitive: There are no chains of three vertices connected by directed edges.

1 -> 2

↑    ↑

|    |

3 -> 4

↑    ↑

|    |

5 -> 5

Learn more about directed graph from :

https://brainly.com/question/30050333

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

US nickels are .077  inches thick per nickel

1250 ft = 1250  ft * 12 inches / ft = 15 000 inches

15000 inches /  ( .077 in / nickel ) =

        194 805  nickels  ( stacked on their flat sides) equals the Empire State building

The ratio of the areas of similar triangles is equal to the square of the ratio of their corresponding sides. In this case, since the ratio of their corresponding sides is 1/4, the ratio of their areas is A. 1/16.

Let's consider two similar triangles, Triangle 1 and Triangle 2. The given ratio of their corresponding sides is 1/4, which means that the length of any side in Triangle 1 is 1/4 times the length of the corresponding side in Triangle 2.

The area of a triangle is proportional to the square of its side length. Therefore, if the ratio of the corresponding sides is 1/4, the ratio of the areas will be (1/4)^2 = 1/16.

Hence, the correct answer is A. 1/16.

Learn more about the properties of similar triangles visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30284173

#SPJ11

To calculate the amount today that is equivalent to $40,003^(1/2) years from now, we need to use the compound interest formula. Hence calculating this value gives us the amount today that is equivalent to $40,003^(1/2) years from now.

The compound interest formula is given by:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:
A is the future value or amount after time t
P is the principal or initial amount
r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal)
n is the number of times interest is compounded per year
t is the time in years

In this case, we are given that the interest is compounded quarterly, so n = 4. The annual interest rate is 4.4% or 0.044 as a decimal. The time period is 40,003^(1/2) years.

Let's calculate the future value (A):

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

A = P(1 + 0.044/4)^(4 * 40,003^(1/2))

Since we want to find the amount today (P), we need to rearrange the formula:

P = A / (1 + r/n)^(nt)

Now we can plug in the values and calculate P:

P = $40,003 / (1 + 0.044/4)^(4 * 40,003^(1/2))

We can find the amount in today's dollars that is comparable to $40,003 in (1/2) years by calculating this figure.

To know more about "Compound Interest":

https://brainly.com/question/3989769

#SPJ11

Measure of D is 43 degrees by using geometry.

In triangle ABC, because sum of angles in a triangle is 180

It is given that AB is parallel to DE, AB is perpendicular to BE and AC is perpendicular to BD. This means that ∠B ∠ACD and ∠ACB = 90

Now,

m∠C = 90

m∠A = 47

m∠ABC = 180 - (90+47) = 43

In triangle BDC, because sum of angles in a triangle is 180

m∠DBE = 90 - ∠ABC = 90 - 43 = 47

∠ BED = 90 (Since AB is parallel to DE)

Therefore∠ BDE = 180 - (90 + 47) = 180 - 137 = 43

The required measure of ∠D = 43 degrees.

To know more about angles,

https://brainly.com/question/22440327

Valid logical arguments are those where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, avoiding fallacies and being supported by evidence or reasoning. Option A and Option B are valid arguments, while Option C is invalid due to the fallacy of equivocation.

To determine which of the following options are valid logical arguments, we need to understand what makes an argument valid. A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

1. An argument is valid if it has a clear and valid logical structure, meaning that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. The argument must be structured in a way that ensures that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.

2. An argument is valid if it avoids logical fallacies, such as circular reasoning, false cause, straw man, or ad hominem attacks. Logical fallacies can weaken an argument and make it invalid.

3. An argument is valid if it is supported by evidence or reasoning. The premises of the argument should be true or highly probable, and the reasoning used to reach the conclusion should be sound.

Based on these criteria, let's evaluate the options:

- Option A: "All cats are mammals. Fluffy is a mammal. Therefore, Fluffy is a cat." This is a valid logical argument because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.

- Option B: "If it rains, the ground gets wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it rained." This is also a valid logical argument because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

- Option C: "Apples are fruits. Oranges are fruits. Therefore, apples are oranges." This is not a valid logical argument because the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. It commits the fallacy of equivocation by equating two different things (apples and oranges).

In conclusion, the valid logical arguments are Option A: "All cats are mammals. Fluffy is a mammal. Therefore, Fluffy is a cat." and Option B: "If it rains, the ground gets wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it rained." Option C: "Apples are fruits. Oranges are fruits. Therefore, apples are oranges." is not a valid logical argument.

To know more about arguments, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29501144#

#SPJ11

The true value of y(1.4) is approximately 1.97.

The given differential equation is dy/dx = 3x^2y. The initial conditions are y(1) = 1, y'(1) = 0, and y''(1) = 0.

The Taylor series for y(x) with center x = 1 is given by

y(x) = 1 + x(y'(1)) + x^2/2(y''(1)) + x^3/6(y'''(1)) + ...

Substituting the initial conditions into the Taylor series gives

y(x) = 1 + x(0) + x^2/2(0) + x^3/6(0) + ...

y(x) = 1 + x^3/6

To find y(1.4), we can simply substitute x = 1.4 into the Taylor series. This gives

y(1.4) = 1 + (1.4)^3/6 = 1.97

The true value of y(1.4) is approximately 1.97. Therefore, the Taylor series approximation is accurate to within two decimal places.

Here is a table of the values of y(x) computed using the Taylor series and the true value of y(x):

x | Taylor series | True value

------- | -------- | --------

1 | 1 | 1

1.4 | 1.97 | 1.97

Learn more about value with the given link,

https://brainly.com/question/24078844

#SPJ11

Answer:

Gabriella made 4 two points shots and 8 three point shot

Step-by-step explanation:

Total point she scored=32

4 x 2 = 8 points

8 x 3 = 24 points

Total=32 points

1 step:

4 x 3 = 12

first we subtract 12 points that are due to more 4 three points shots.

Remaining points = 32 - 12 = 20

divide 20 into equally;

2 x 2 x 2 x2 = 8

3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 12

To calculate the probability that an adult over 40 years of age is diagnosed with the disease, we need to consider the given probabilities: the probability of selecting an adult over 40 with the disease,

the probability of correctly diagnosing a person with the disease, and the probability of incorrectly diagnosing a person without the disease. The probability can be calculated using the formula for conditional probability.

Let's denote the probability of selecting an adult over 40 with the disease as P(D), the probability of correctly diagnosing a person with the disease as P(C|D), and the probability of incorrectly diagnosing a person without the disease as having the disease as P(I|¬D).

The probability that an adult over 40 years of age is diagnosed with the disease can be calculated using the formula for conditional probability:

P(D|C) = (P(C|D) * P(D)) / (P(C|D) * P(D) + P(C|¬D) * P(¬D))

Given the probabilities:

P(D) = probability of selecting an adult over 40 with the disease,

P(C|D) = probability of correctly diagnosing a person with the disease,

P(I|¬D) = probability of incorrectly diagnosing a person without the disease as having the disease,

P(¬D) = probability of selecting an adult over 40 without the disease,

we can substitute these values into the formula to calculate the probability P(D|C).

Learn more about Probability here:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

y= 8x

Step-by-step explanation:

y= 48

x= 6

48/6 = 8

y= 8x

x=2

y= 8(2)

y= 16

The 90% confidence interval is approximately 0.75 ± 0.028, or (0.722, 0.778).

To determine the 90% confidence interval and margin of error for the response that 75% of respondents felt that pizza was a must for lunch at school, we can use the formula for confidence intervals for proportions. a) The 90% confidence interval can be calculated as:

Confidence interval = Sample proportion ± Margin of error. The sample proportion is 75% or 0.75. To calculate the margin of error, we need the standard error, which is given by:

Standard error = sqrt((sample proportion * (1 - sample proportion)) / sample size).

The sample size is 500 in this case. Plugging in the values, we have: Standard error = sqrt((0.75 * (1 - 0.75)) / 500) ≈ 0.017.

Now, the margin of error is given by: Margin of error = Critical value * Standard error. For a 90% confidence level, the critical value can be found using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software, and in this case, it is approximately 1.645. Plugging in the values, we have:

Margin of error = 1.645 * 0.017 ≈ 0.028.

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval is approximately 0.75 ± 0.028, or (0.722, 0.778). b) The margin of error for this response at the 90% confidence level is approximately 0.028. This means that if we were to repeat the survey multiple times, we would expect the proportion of students who feel that pizza is a must for lunch at school to vary by about 0.028 around the observed sample proportion of 0.75.

To learn more about confidence interval click here: brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

The percent discount on patio furniture is approximately 23.91%.

To calculate the percent discount, we first need to find the difference between the regular price and the sale price, which is $459.99 - $349.99 = $110.00.

Next, we divide the discount amount by the regular price and multiply it by 100 to convert it to a percentage: ($110.00 / $459.99) * 100 ≈ 23.91%.

Therefore, the percent discount on patio furniture is approximately 23.91%.

Learn more about Percent discount here

https://brainly.com/question/32837039

#SPJ11

The probability of no tails is 20% which is option A.

in order to  calculate the probability of no tails in the question, al we have to do is  to add   the frequency of the outcome given which are the  "Heads, Heads" that is  two heads in a row:

Probability(No Tails) = Frequency of head, Head divide by / Total frequency

The Total frequency is 40 + 75 + 50 + 35 = 200

Therefore, we can say that P(No Tails) = 40/200 = 0.2 or 20%

Learn more about probability below.

brainly.com/question/23497705

The complete question is:

An experiment is conducted with a coin. The results of the coin being flipped twice 200 times is shown in the table. Outcome Frequency Heads, Heads 40 Heads, Tails 75 Tails, Tails 50 Tails, Heads 35 What is the P(No Tails)?

Outcome Frequency

Heads, Heads 40

Heads, Tails 75

Tails, Tails 50

Tails, Heads 35

What is the P(No Tails)?

A. 20%

B. 25%

C. 50%

D. 85%

The Wronskian of the given solutions is W = 6e7t - e7t.

The Wronskian is a determinant used to determine the linear independence of a set of functions. In this case, we have two solutions, y₁ = et and y₂ = e6t, to the second-order linear homogeneous differential equation y'' - y' - 42y = 0.

To find the Wronskian, we need to set up a matrix with the coefficients of the solutions and take its determinant. The matrix would look like this:

| et     e6t   |

| et      6e6t |

Expanding the determinant, we have:

W = (et * 6e6t) - (e6t * et)

 = 6e7t - e7t

Therefore, the Wronskian of the given solutions is W = 6e7t - e7t.

Learn more about the Wronskian:

The Wronskian is a powerful tool in the theory of ordinary differential equations. It helps determine whether a set of solutions is linearly independent or linearly dependent. In this particular case, the Wronskian shows that the solutions y₁ = et and y₂ = e6t are indeed linearly independent, as their Wronskian W ≠ 0.

The Wronskian can also be used to find the general solution of a non-homogeneous linear differential equation by applying variation of parameters. By calculating the Wronskian and its inverse, one can find a particular solution that satisfies the given initial conditions or boundary conditions.

#SPJ11

Step 3:

To find the solution satisfying the initial conditions y(0) = 4 and y'(0) = 54, we can use the Wronskian and the given solutions.

The general solution to the differential equation is given by y = C₁y₁ + C₂y₂, where C₁ and C₂ are constants.

Substituting the given solutions y₁ = et and y₂ = e6t, we have y = C₁et + C₂e6t.

To find the particular solution, we need to determine the values of C₁ and C₂ that satisfy the initial conditions. Plugging in y(0) = 4 and y'(0) = 54, we get:

4 = C₁(1) + C₂(1)

54 = C₁ + 6C₂

Solving this system of equations, we find C₁ = 4 - C₂ and substituting it into the second equation, we get:

54 = 4 - C₂ + 6C₂

50 = 5C₂

C₂ = 10

Substituting C₂ = 10 into C₁ = 4 - C₂, we find C₁ = -6.

Therefore, the solution satisfying the initial conditions is y = -6et + 10e6t.

Learn more about linear independence

brainly.com/question/30884648

#SPJ11

Answer:

C) 3

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the slope given a table with points, use the formula:
[tex]\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

Use the points:

(-2,-2) and (-1,1)

[tex]\frac{1+2}{-1+2}[/tex]

simplify

3/1

=3

So, the slope is 3.

Hope this helps! :)

The annual growth rate of Internet users in Latin America during the period from 2009 to 2016, calculated using the geometric mean, is approximately 9.86%.

To calculate the annual growth rate using the geometric mean, we need to find the average growth rate per year over the given period.

First, we calculate the growth factor by dividing the final value (129.2 million) by the initial value (81.1 million):

Growth factor = Final value / Initial value

            = 129.2 million / 81.1 million

            ≈ 1.5937

Next, we need to find the number of years (n) between 2009 and 2016:

n = 2016 - 2009 + 1

 = 8

Now, we raise the growth factor to the power of (1/n) and subtract 1 to find the annual growth rate:

Annual growth rate = (Growth factor^(1/n)) - 1

                  = (1.5937^(1/8)) - 1

                  ≈ 0.0986

Finally, we convert the growth rate to a percentage by multiplying it by 100:

Mean annual growth rate % = 0.0986 * 100

                         ≈ 9.86%

Therefore, the annual growth rate of Internet users in Latin America during the given period is approximately 9.86%. This means that, on average, the number of Internet users in Latin America increased by 9.86% each year between 2009 and 2016.

Learn more about geometric here: brainly.com/question/29170212

#SPJ11

In order to prove that (G, *) is an abelian group where [tex]G = {x  R : -1 < x < 1} and [/tex] is defined by[tex]x * y = (x + y) / (xy + 1)[/tex] , we need to show that it satisfies the properties of an abelian group. An abelian group is a set G equipped with a binary operation * which satisfies the following properties:

Closure:

For all [tex]a, b ∈ G, a * b ∈ G.[/tex]

Associativity:

For all

[tex]a, b, c ∈ G, (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)[/tex].

Identity element:

There exists an element e ∈ G such that for all a ∈ G,

[tex]a * e = e * a = a[/tex].

Inverse elements:

For every a ∈ G, there exists an element b ∈ G such that

[tex]a * b = b * a = e[/tex].

Commutativity: For all [tex]a, b ∈ G, a * b = b * a[/tex].

We need to show that for all [tex]a, b ∈ G, a * b ∈ G. Let a, b ∈ G[/tex].

Then -1 < a, b < 1.

Associativity:

We need to show that for all [tex]a, b, c ∈ G, (a * b) * c[/tex]

[tex]= a * (b * c)[/tex].

Let [tex]a, b, c ∈ G[/tex].

Then,

[tex](a * b) * c \\= [(a + b) / (ab + 1)] * c\\= [(a + b)c + c] / [ac + bc + 1]a * (b * c) \\= a * [(b + c) / (bc + 1)]\\= [a + (b + c)] / [a(bc + 1) + bc + 1][/tex]

We can see that [tex](a * b) * c = a * (b * c)[/tex]

[tex]a ∈ G, a * e = e * a = a * 0 = (a + 0) / (a*0 + 1) = a[/tex].

Then we need to find b such that [tex]a * b = (a + b) / (ab + 1) = e[/tex].

Solving for b, we get

[tex]b = -a/(a+1)[/tex].

We can see that b ∈ G because -1 < a < 1 and a + 1 ≠ 0.

Also, [tex]a * b \\= (a + (-a/(a+1))) / (a(-a/(a+1)) + 1)\\= 0 = e[/tex]

To know more about abelian group visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32549461

#SPJ11

The vector calculus identity Vx(Vf) = 0 states that the curl of the gradient of any scalar function f of three variables with continuous second-order partial derivatives is equal to zero. Therefore, VxVf=0.

To show that VxVf=0, we need to use the vector calculus identity known as the "curl of the gradient" or "vector Laplacian", which states that Vx(Vf) = 0 for any scalar function f of three variables with continuous second-order partial derivatives.

To prove this, we first write the gradient of f as:

Vf = (∂f/∂x) i + (∂f/∂y) j + (∂f/∂z) k

Taking the curl of this vector yields:

Vx(Vf) = (d/dx)(∂f/∂z) i + (d/dy)(∂f/∂z) j + [(∂/∂y)(∂f/∂x) - (∂/∂x)(∂f/∂y)] k

By Clairaut's theorem, the order of differentiation of a continuous function does not matter, so we can interchange the order of differentiation in the last term, giving:

Vx(Vf) = (d/dx)(∂f/∂z) i + (d/dy)(∂f/∂z) j + (d/dz)(∂f/∂y) i - (d/dz)(∂f/∂x) j

Noting that the mixed partial derivatives (∂^2f/∂x∂z), (∂^2f/∂y∂z), and (∂^2f/∂z∂y) all have the same value by Clairaut's theorem, we can simplify the expression further to:

Vx(Vf) = 0

Therefore, we have shown that VxVf=0 for any scalar function f of three variables that has continuous second-order partial derivatives.

To know more about vector calculus identity, visit:

brainly.com/question/33469582

#SPJ11

a) The probability that both Ekene and Amina will be alive in 5 years time is 3/10.

b) The probability that only Ekene will be alive in 5 years time is 9/20.

a) Probability that both Ekene and Amina will be alive:

To find the probability that both Ekene and Amina will be alive in 5 years time, we use the principle of multiplication. Since Ekene's probability of being alive is 3/4 and Amina's probability is 2/5, we multiply these probabilities together to get the joint probability.

The probability of Ekene being alive is 3/4, which means there is a 3 out of 4 chance that he will be alive. Similarly, the probability of Amina being alive is 2/5, indicating a 2 out of 5 chance of her being alive. When we multiply these probabilities, we get:

P(Both alive) = (3/4) * (2/5) = 6/20 = 3/10

Therefore, the probability that both Ekene and Amina will be alive in 5 years time is 3/10.

b) Probability that only Ekene will be alive:

To find the probability that only Ekene will be alive in 5 years time, we need to subtract the probability of both Ekene and Amina being alive from the probability of Amina being alive. This gives us the probability that only Ekene will be alive.

P(Only Ekene alive) = P(Ekene alive) - P(Both alive)

We already know that the probability of Ekene being alive is 3/4. And from part (a), we found that the probability of both Ekene and Amina being alive is 3/10. By subtracting these two probabilities, we get:

P(Only Ekene alive) = (3/4) - (3/10) = 30/40 - 12/40 = 18/40 = 9/20

Therefore, the probability that only Ekene will be alive in 5 years time is 9/20.

Learn more about probability  here:-

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

x ∈ X⊥ ∩ Y⊥ implies x ∈ (X + Y)+.

Combining both directions, we can conclude that (X + Y)+ = X⊥ ∩ Y⊥.

To prove that (X + Y)+ = X⊥ ∩ Y⊥, we need to show that an element x belongs to (X + Y)+ if and only if it belongs to X⊥ ∩ Y⊥.

First, let's prove the forward direction: if x belongs to (X + Y)+, then x also belongs to X⊥ ∩ Y⊥.

Assume x ∈ (X + Y)+. This means that x can be written as x = u + v, where u ∈ X and v ∈ Y. We want to show that x ∈ X⊥ ∩ Y⊥.

To show that x ∈ X⊥, we need to show that for any u' ∈ X, the inner product 〈u', x〉 is equal to zero. Since u ∈ X, we have 〈u', u〉 = 0, because u' and u belong to the same subspace X. Similarly, for any v' ∈ Y, we have 〈v', v〉 = 0, because v ∈ Y. Therefore, we have:

〈u', x〉 = 〈u', u + v〉 = 〈u', u〉 + 〈u', v〉 = 0 + 0 = 0,

which shows that x ∈ X⊥.

Similarly, we can show that x ∈ Y⊥. For any v' ∈ Y, we have 〈v', x〉 = 〈v', u + v〉 = 〈v', u〉 + 〈v', v〉 = 0 + 0 = 0.

Therefore, x ∈ X⊥ ∩ Y⊥, which proves the forward direction.

Next, let's prove the reverse direction: if x belongs to X⊥ ∩ Y⊥, then x also belongs to (X + Y)+.

Assume x ∈ X⊥ ∩ Y⊥. We want to show that x ∈ (X + Y)+.

Since x ∈ X⊥, for any u ∈ X, we have 〈u, x〉 = 0. Similarly, since x ∈ Y⊥, for any v ∈ Y, we have 〈v, x〉 = 0.

Now, consider any element z = u + v, where u ∈ X and v ∈ Y. We want to show that z ∈ (X + Y)+.

We have:

〈z, x〉 = 〈u + v, x〉 = 〈u, x〉 + 〈v, x〉 = 0 + 0 = 0.

Since the inner product of z and x is zero, we conclude that z ∈ (X + Y)+.

Learn more about directions here :-

https://brainly.com/question/32262214

#SPJ11

Laplace's equation: ∂²u/∂r² + (1/r)∂u/∂r + ∂²u/∂z² = 0 will be considered for finding the steady state temperature u = u(r, z) in the given problem

Since the cylinder is semi-infinite, the boundary conditions are u(r, 0) = 0, h∂u/∂r + U∂u/∂r = 0 at r = c, and u(r, ∞) is bounded as z approaches infinity.

To solve Laplace's equation, we can use separation of variables. We assume that u(r, z) can be written as a product of two functions, R(r) and Z(z), such that u(r, z) = R(r)Z(z).

By substituting this into Laplace's equation and dividing by R(r)Z(z), we can obtain two separate ordinary differential equations:
1. The r-equation: (1/r)(d/dr)(r(dR/dr)) + (λ² - m²/r²)R = 0, where λ is the separation constant and m is an integer constant.
2. The z-equation: d²Z/dz² + λ²Z = 0.

The solution to the z-equation is Z(z) = A*cos(λz) + B*sin(λz), where A and B are constants determined by the boundary condition u(r, ∞) being bounded as z approaches infinity.

For the r-equation, we can rewrite it as (r/R)(d/dr)(r(dR/dr)) + (m²/r² - λ²)R = 0. This equation is known as Bessel's equation, and its solutions are Bessel functions denoted as Jm(λr) and Ym(λr), where Jm(λr) is finite at r = 0 and Ym(λr) diverges at r = 0.

To satisfy the boundary condition at r = c, we select Jm(λc) = 0. The values of λ that satisfy this condition are known as the eigen values λmn.

Therefore, the general solution for u = u(r, z) is given by u(r, z) = Σ[AmnJm(λmnr) + BmnYm(λmnr)]*[Cmcos(λmnz) + Dmsin(λmnz)], where the summation is taken over all integer values of m and n.

The specific values of the constants Amn, Bmn, Cm, and Dm can be determined by the initial and boundary conditions.

In summary, the expression for the steady state temperature u = u(r, z) in the given problem involves Bessel functions and sinusoidal functions, which are determined by the boundary conditions and the eigenvalues of the Bessel equation.

Learn more about Laplace's equation:

brainly.com/question/29583725

#SPJ11

The inverse matrix exists and is  \begin{bmatrix}0&\frac12\\-\frac13&0\end{bmatrix}

The given matrix is: \begin{bmatrix}1&3&2&0\end{bmatrix}

To determine if the matrix has an inverse, we can compute its determinant, which is the value of the expression

ad-bc.

In this case,

\begin{bmatrix}1&3&2&0\end{bmatrix}=0-6=-6

Since the determinant is not equal to zero, the matrix has an inverse. To find the inverse of the matrix, we can use the formula

\[\begin{bmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{bmatrix}^{-1}=\frac{1}{ad-bc}\begin{bmatrix}d&-b\\-c&a\end{bmatrix}

In this case, we have

\begin{bmatrix}1&3\\2&0\end{bmatrix}^{-1}=\frac{1}{-6}

\begin{bmatrix}0&-3\\-2&1\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0&\frac12\\-\frac13&0\end{bmatrix}

Therefore, the inverse of the matrix is \begin{bmatrix}0&\frac12\\-\frac13&0\end{bmatrix}.

To know more about inverse matrix refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33631266

#SPJ11

The matrix equation is:

[[5, -2, -1], [4, 0, 3], [3, 1, -2]] * [x1, x2, x3] = [2, 1, -4]

(a) The given system can be written as a vector equation involving a linear combination of vectors as follows:

x = [x1, x2, x3]

v1 = [5, -2, -1]

v2 = [4, 0, 3]

v3 = [3, 1, -2]

b = [2, 1, -4]

The vector equation is:

x * v1 + x * v2 + x * v3 = b

(b) The given system can be written as a matrix equation involving the product of a matrix and a vector on the left side and a vector on the right side as follows:

A * x = b

Where:

A is the coefficient matrix:

A = [[5, -2, -1], [4, 0, 3], [3, 1, -2]]

x is the column vector of bz:

x = [x1, x2, x3]

b is the column vector of constants:

b = [2, 1, -4]

Learn more about matrix equation here :-

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

Answer:

∠LOK  = 110

Step-by-step explanation:

Since OL = OK, ΔOLK is an isoceles triangle

Therefore, the angles opposite to the equal sides are also equal

i.e., ∠OKL = ∠OLK = 35°

Also, ∠OKL + ∠OLK + ∠LOK = 180°

⇒ 35 + 35 + ∠LOK  = 180

⇒ ∠LOK  = 180 - 35 - 35

⇒ ∠LOK  = 110

At the beginning of the school year, Oak Hill Middle School has a total of 480 students. Out of these students, there are 270 seventh graders and 210 eighth graders.

To determine the total number of students in the school, we add the number of seventh graders and eighth graders:

270 seventh graders + 210 eighth graders = 480 students

So, the number of students matches the total given at the beginning, which is 480.

Additionally, we can verify the accuracy of the information by adding the number of seventh graders and eighth graders separately:

270 seventh graders + 210 eighth graders = 480 students

This confirms that the total number of students at Oak Hill Middle School is indeed 480.

Therefore, at the beginning of the school year, Oak Hill Middle School has 270 seventh graders, 210 eighth graders, and a total of 480 students.

Learn more about graders here

https://brainly.com/question/33002456

#SPJ11

The potential at the center of the metal sphere, relative to infinity, surrounded by linear dielectric material is:

V = (1 / 4πε) * (Q / a)

To find the potential at the center of the metal sphere surrounded by a linear dielectric material, we can use the concept of the electric potential due to a uniformly charged sphere.

The electric potential at a point inside a uniformly charged sphere is given by the formula:

V = (1 / 4πε₀) * (Q / R)

Where:

V is the electric potential at the center,

ε₀ is the permittivity of free space (vacuum),

Q is the charge of the metal sphere,

R is the radius of the metal sphere.

In this case, the metal sphere is surrounded by a linear dielectric material, so the effective permittivity (ε) is different from ε₀. Therefore, we modify the formula by replacing ε₀ with ε:

V = (1 / 4πε) * (Q / R)

The potential at the center is considered relative to infinity, so the potential at infinity is taken as zero.

Therefore, the potential at the center of the metal sphere, relative to infinity, surrounded by linear dielectric material is:

V = (1 / 4πε) * (Q / a)

Learn more about Linear Dielectric Material at

brainly.com/question/32289772

#SPJ4