________ have traditionally favored the allocation of power to the states.

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Sexual assault refers to any sexual activity that occurs without the explicit consent of all individuals involved. It encompasses a range of non-consensual acts, including unwanted sexual touching, coerced sexual acts, and any form of sexual contact or penetration without the consent of one or more participants. Consent must be given freely, with full understanding and enthusiasm from all parties involved, for any sexual activity to be considered consensual.

True. Sexual assault includes any sexual activity performed without consent.

Sexual assault does encompass any sexual activity that is carried out without consent. Consent is a crucial aspect of sexual interactions, and any form of sexual activity without the explicit and voluntary agreement of all parties involved is considered sexual assault. It is essential to prioritize consent and respect the boundaries and autonomy of individuals in order to maintain healthy and consensual relationships.

Laws and definitions of sexual assault may vary across jurisdictions, but the core principle remains the same: engaging in any sexual activity without consent is a violation and constitutes sexual assault.

To know more about Sexual assault, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30401153

#SPJ11

The two basic types of sexual harassment as defined by the law are: C. Quid pro quo / hostile environment

Quid pro quo harassment refers to situations where employment benefits or opportunities are contingent upon the victim's submission to unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature.

Hostile environment harassment involves creating a work or educational environment that is intimidating, hostile, or offensive due to unwelcome sexual conduct. This can include inappropriate comments, gestures, images, or other sexually explicit behavior that interferes with an individual's ability to work or learn.

It is important to note that sexual harassment can occur to individuals of any gender, and both men and women can be victims of sexual harassment.

To read more about Sexual Harassment click here

https://brainly.com/question/9647226

#SPJ11

An orange triangular sign on the back of a vehicle means: Indicates a warning or cautionary message.

An orange triangular sign on the back of a vehicle is typically used to convey a warning or cautionary message to other road users. It serves as a visual alert, signaling that there may be potential hazards or special conditions related to the vehicle. These signs are commonly seen on slow-moving vehicles, construction vehicles, and other vehicles that require extra attention from drivers and pedestrians. The purpose of the sign is to increase awareness and promote safety on the road by providing advance notice of potential dangers or unique circumstances associated with the vehicle.

Road signs and their meanings: Road signs play a crucial role in conveying information and ensuring safety on the roads. They serve as visual cues that communicate various messages to drivers, pedestrians, and other road users. The use of standardized signs and symbols helps to establish consistency and understanding across different regions and countries. Orange triangular signs, in particular, are widely recognized as warning signs, alerting individuals to exercise caution and be prepared for specific situations. It is important for all road users to familiarize themselves with the meaning and significance of different signs to promote road safety.

Learn more about orange triangular

brainly.com/question/14308903

#SPJ11

The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.

Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.

The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.

To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961368

#SPJ4

Courts depend on other parties to bring cases.

The role of the courts in the regulatory system is largely passive because they depend on other parties to bring cases before them and rule on those cases. Unlike government agencies that actively develop agendas and set priorities to achieve specific goals, the courts primarily function as impartial arbiters of the law. They do not proactively initiate regulatory actions or create regulations themselves.

Instead, courts rely on individuals, organizations, or other parties to act as private attorneys general and bring legal disputes or challenges before them. These parties are responsible for identifying potential violations of regulations or seeking remedies for regulatory issues through litigation. The courts then assess the arguments and evidence presented by the parties involved and make rulings based on the interpretation and application of the law.

This passive role of the courts ensures that they maintain their independence and impartiality in the regulatory process. They act as neutral decision-makers, applying legal principles to specific cases brought before them rather than actively shaping or driving the regulatory agenda.

Learn more about Courts

brainly.com/question/8433911

#SPJ11

In Maryland, alcohol-related charges, such as driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while impaired (DWI), generally stay on a driving record for five years.

Alcohol-related charges are considered serious traffic offenses in Maryland, and they can have significant consequences, including license suspension, fines, and potentially even jail time. While the conviction itself may stay on the driving record for five years, it is important to note that the impact of the offense can extend beyond that period. For instance, insurance companies may consider the offense for a longer duration when determining insurance rates.

It is advisable to consult with local authorities or a legal professional for specific information regarding Maryland's laws and regulations pertaining to alcohol-related charges and their impact on driving records.

To read more about Driving While Impaired click here

https://brainly.com/question/32105965

#SPJ11

All of these choices are correct. A consumer is a person , a business, a government unit.

A consumer is a person or a group who initiate order, or uses purchased goods, products, or services primarily for personal, social, family, household and similar needs, who is not directly related to entrepreneurial or business activities.

A consumer cannot resell the good, product or service but can consume it to earn his/her livelihood and self-employment.

The consumer can be termed as the end-user of the goods or services.

So, all the choices are correct as the consumer is a person , a business, a government unit.

Learn more about consumer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32656425

#SPJ1

The law enacted to prevent corporate accounting-related crimes is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. So, the Last option is accurate.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, was passed by the U.S. Congress in response to high-profile corporate accounting scandals, such as Enron and WorldCom. The purpose of the act was to enhance transparency, accuracy, and accountability in financial reporting by public companies.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act introduced a range of reforms and requirements for public companies and their auditors. It established stricter regulations for corporate governance, internal controls, financial reporting, and the independence of external auditors. The act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to oversee and regulate public accounting firms.

By imposing more stringent standards and penalties for fraudulent financial activities, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act aimed to restore investor confidence and protect the integrity of financial markets. It played a significant role in shaping corporate accountability and setting higher standards for transparency and corporate governance in the United States.

To know more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act

brainly.com/question/30781511

#SPJ11

The minimum distance at which you should follow another vehicle is typically measured in terms of time rather than distance.

Common names for this idea include "safe following distance" and "stopping distance." The "two-second rule" is frequently cited as the suggested minimum distance to follow another vehicle.

The two-second rule acts as a benchmark for keeping a safe distance that gives drivers enough time to react and stop in the event that the car in front unexpectedly stops or hits an obstruction.

You might need to adjust the following distance to guarantee safety when driving inclement weather or at faster speeds.

Learn more about distance, here:

brainly.com/question/31847278

#SPJ1

When data is analyzed related to who is involved in crimes, namely victims and offenders, it is often called crime intelligence analysis" which is false because crime intelligence analysis refers to a broader concept.

Crime intelligence analysis involves the analysis of various types of data, including but not limited to information on victims and offenders. It encompasses the examination of crime patterns, trends, modus operandi, criminal networks, and other factors that contribute to criminal activities

This analysis helps law enforcement agencies identify potential threats, allocate resources effectively, and develop strategies to prevent and solve crimes.

While data on victims and offenders are important components of crime intelligence analysis, it does not solely focus on them.

For more questions like Crimes please click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28311530

#SPJ11

An executive agency describes a government agency that makes and enforces policies in order to protect the people. The correct option is letter C.

Executive agencies refer to the government agencies that are formed to carry out the administration of the government. It enforces and manages programs that are established by law. Executive agencies are responsible for making policies and rules that benefit the people.

The executive agency consists of a number of departments that work together to provide the best services to the citizens. The agencies provide various services like health, safety, education, social security, and more. Examples of executive agencies include the Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Justice, and Department of Treasury among others.

The correct option is letter C.

For more information about executive agency, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13618530

#SPJ11

In deciding cases, courts apply statutes (laws) and legal precedents (prior cases whose principles and decisions are used by judges as the bases for their decisions in present cases).

Courts rely on two main sources of authority when deciding cases: statutes and legal precedents. Statutes refer to laws that are enacted by legislative bodies, such as federal or state legislatures. These laws outline specific rules and regulations that govern various aspects of society, including criminal offenses, contract disputes, property rights, and more. When interpreting statutes, judges aim to determine the legislative intent and apply the law accordingly to the facts of the case.

Legal precedents, also known as case law or judicial precedents, are previous court decisions that establish legal principles and interpretations. Judges often look to precedents from higher courts, such as appellate courts or the supreme court, as guiding authorities in their decision-making process. Precedents provide a framework for consistency and predictability in the legal system, ensuring that similar cases are treated similarly.

In summary, courts consider both statutes and legal precedents when deciding cases. Statutes are the laws passed by legislatures, while legal precedents are the principles and decisions from previous cases that shape the current interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Property Rights click here

https://brainly.com/question/29613081

#SPJ11

Selling alcohol after hours (after 2:00 am) is typically considered a violation of liquor licensing laws.

Selling alcohol after hours, commonly after 2:00 am, is generally regarded as a violation of liquor licensing laws. These laws govern the sale, distribution, and consumption of alcohol within a specific jurisdiction and typically include regulations on operating hours for establishments that serve alcohol. Selling alcohol outside of the permitted hours is often seen as a breach of these regulations and may result in penalties or consequences for the establishment or individual involved. The specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms can vary depending on local laws and regulations.

Learn more about Selling alcohol

brainly.com/question/30846841

#SPJ11

The two pathways to challenging a Supreme Court decision are through constitutional amendment or through subsequent court rulings.

When a Supreme Court decision is made, it is considered final and binding unless certain measures are taken to challenge it. One pathway to overcome a Supreme Court decision is through a constitutional amendment. This requires a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution, which must be ratified by the states to become part of the Constitution.

The amendment process is deliberately designed to be a rigorous and deliberate procedure to ensure broad consensus. Another pathway is through subsequent court rulings. As times change and societal perspectives evolve, new cases may arise that provide an opportunity for the Supreme Court to reconsider or modify its previous decision. These subsequent court rulings can help reinterpret or clarify the legal principles established by the Supreme Court's previous decision. It is important to note that both pathways involve legal processes that require careful consideration, analysis, and often significant time and effort.

Learn more about Supreme Court decision

brainly.com/question/31146664

#SPJ11

Today, juvenile delinquency is more likely to be handled formally rather than informally. Over the years, there has been a shift towards a more formal and structured approach in dealing with juvenile delinquency. This is largely due to the recognition of the need for accountability, intervention, and rehabilitation for juvenile offenders. So, the given statement is False.

In many jurisdictions, specific laws and systems have been established to address juvenile delinquency. These systems often involve specialized juvenile courts and justice processes that aim to provide fair and tailored responses to the unique needs and circumstances of young offenders. This includes procedures such as formal adjudication, probation, diversion programs, and secure detention facilities.

Informal handling of juvenile delinquency, such as informal warnings or reprimands from law enforcement or community-based interventions, still exists to some extent. However, the trend in recent years has been towards more structured and formal approaches to address juvenile delinquency and ensure the protection of both the community and the rights of the young offenders.

To read more about Laws click here

https://brainly.com/question/12469633

#SPJ11

All the statements 61. 62, 63, 64 and 65 are true relation to the court of law.

Being the plaintiff in the case of Jones v. Adams denotes that Jones brought the legal action against Adams. The plaintiff is the party who filed the lawsuit and is asking the court for a remedy or decision.

A court's authority or jurisdiction over a particular piece of property is referred to as in rem jurisdiction. Even if the parties to the dispute are not physically present or within the court's jurisdiction as it enables the court to make decisions and pronouncements regarding the subject property.

Typically, an individual sues another individual in a civil matter. Disputes between private parties, such as individuals, businesses or organizations, who seek redress or compensation for alleged wrongs or contractual breaches, are known as civil matters.

The term "jurisdiction" describes a court's ability and authority to consider and resolve a case or dispute. It establishes a court's legal standing to decide a specific legal issue and to uphold its rulings.

Trial courts are in charge of hearing cases for the first time and rendering preliminary judgments. Typically, they do not hear appeals. The majority of the time, appeals are made to higher courts such as appellate courts in order to have the trial court's judgment reviewed for violations of the law or procedural fairness.

Learn more about rem jurisdiction at:

brainly.com/question/30490907

#SPJ4

A closed-shop agreement requires firms to hire individuals who are already union members. In a closed-shop agreement, an employer can only hire individuals who are already members of a specific union. This type of agreement effectively makes union membership a requirement for employment at the firm.

Closed-shop agreements were more common in the past but have been restricted or prohibited in many jurisdictions. These agreements aim to support and strengthen labor unions by ensuring that all employees within a certain workplace or industry are union members. By requiring union membership, closed-shop agreements seek to promote solidarity among workers and enhance the collective bargaining power of the union.

To read more about Closed-Shop Agreement click here

https://brainly.com/question/31366661

#SPJ11

An anticipatory breach may be implied by some clear, unambiguous action on the part of one of the parties in a contract. The correct answer is option B.

An anticipatory breach of contract is when a party takes a step that shows it intends to break its contractual obligations to another party.  However, verbal or written confirmation is not necessary, and a breach can occur if an obligation is not fulfilled on time.

The counterparty has the right to file a lawsuit once it can prove the other party intends to break the agreement.

Therefore, the appropriate option is B.

To learn more on anticipatory breach, here:

https://brainly.com/question/32151024

#SPJ4

The court's 1964 ruling in Cooper v. Pate held that state prisoners have the right to sue in federal court to challenge the conditions of their confinement under the Civil Rights Act of 1871.

In Cooper v. Pate, the Supreme Court of the United States established that state prisoners could bring civil rights claims in federal court. This landmark decision expanded the scope of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, also known as the "Ku Klux Klan Act," to include individuals who were incarcerated. The ruling recognized that prisoners have constitutional rights and can seek legal recourse to challenge violations of those rights, particularly regarding cruel and unusual punishment and the infringement of their First Amendment rights. The decision in Cooper v. Pate affirmed the principle that prisoners, like all individuals, are entitled to protection under the law and can seek redress through the federal court system for civil rights violations occurring during their confinement.

To read more about Civil Rights Act of 1871 click here

https://brainly.com/question/10452982

#SPJ11

Mediation seeks to avoid the consequences of formal processing. Mediation is a voluntary and informal process in which a neutral third party, the mediator, assists the disputing parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution. It focuses on facilitating communication, understanding, and collaboration between the parties to find a solution that meets their interests and needs.

Unlike litigation (c) and adjudication (d), which involve formal court proceedings and the rendering of a binding decision by a judge or arbitrator, mediation provides a more flexible and non-adversarial approach. It allows the parties to maintain control over the outcome and actively participate in the resolution process. Mediation can be an effective alternative to litigation, offering a quicker, less expensive, and potentially more satisfactory resolution for all parties involved.

Arbitration (a), on the other hand, is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that is more formal than mediation. It involves the submission of the dispute to a neutral arbitrator or panel, who renders a decision that is typically binding on the parties. While arbitration avoids the formalities of a courtroom trial, it does involve a more structured and legally binding process than mediation.

To read more about Mediation click here

https://brainly.com/question/30783013

#SPJ11

In the controversial Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court declared several key points:

1. Slaves and their descendants, even if born in free states, were not considered citizens of the United States and therefore could not bring lawsuits in federal courts.

2. The Court held that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional. This decision effectively declared that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories.

3. The Court determined that slaves were property, and as such, the Fifth Amendment protected the rights of slaveholders to their property. This meant that slave owners could bring their slaves into any territory or state, regardless of its laws against slavery.

The Dred Scott decision, delivered in 1857, was highly controversial and further deepened the divide between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. It was widely criticized for its impact on the status of slaves, the expansion of slavery into new territories, and its contribution to the tensions that ultimately led to the American Civil War. The decision was later effectively nullified by the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery.

To learn more about Dred Scott decision, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32102610

#SPJ11

The most likely outcome is a white employee filing a reverse discrimination lawsuit.

The most likely outcome in this scenario is that a white man or woman will file a reverse discrimination lawsuit (option d).

Although the organization has attempted to increase diversity by hiring African American women and disabled individuals, if the primary motivation for doing so was to avoid discrimination lawsuits rather than to create a more diverse and inclusive workplace, it is possible that these individuals may not be given equal opportunities or may face discrimination within the organization.

This could ultimately lead to a lawsuit being filed against the organization by a white employee who feels they were unfairly passed over for promotion or faced other forms of discrimination.

Options a and b are less likely because simply hiring a more diverse workforce does not necessarily guarantee an increase in organizational performance, nor does it automatically result in winning an award for equity. Option c could be a potential outcome, but it is less likely to occur than a reverse discrimination lawsuit given the circumstances described in the scenario.

It is important for organizations to prioritize diversity and inclusion for genuine reasons, rather than solely to avoid legal consequences. By creating a truly equitable and inclusive workplace, organizations can benefit from a myriad of positive outcomes such as increased innovation, better problem-solving, and improved employee morale.

Learn more about discrimination lawsuit

brainly.com/question/32434503

#SPJ11

The power to grant pardons, reprieves, or remissions of punishment under Article 72 of the Constitution of India is exercised by the President of India.

Article 72 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment in certain cases. This power is vested in the President to ensure justice, fairness, and the exercise of mercy. The President can grant pardons, which completely absolve the convicted individual of the offense, or provide reprieves, respites, or remissions, which may reduce or suspend the punishment imposed. The President exercises this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers or after consulting the appropriate authority, depending on the nature of the case. The power of pardon is an important constitutional prerogative aimed at ensuring justice and compassion in exceptional circumstances.

To read more about President of India click here

https://brainly.com/question/475385

#SPJ11

A breach of contract typically entitles the nonbreaching party to sue for damages. So, the given statement is True.

When a breach of contract occurs, it means that one party has failed to fulfill their obligations as outlined in the contract. The nonbreaching party, who has upheld their end of the agreement, is generally entitled to seek legal remedies to recover the losses they have suffered due to the breach.

One of the primary remedies available to the nonbreaching party is to sue for damages. Damages are a monetary award intended to compensate the injured party for the losses they have incurred as a result of the breach. The damages aim to place the nonbreaching party in the position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed.

The specific types and calculation of damages will depend on the circumstances and the terms of the contract. It's important for the nonbreaching party to gather evidence of the damages suffered, such as financial records, invoices, or other relevant documentation, to support their claim for compensation.

However, it's worth noting that in some cases, parties may choose alternative remedies for a breach of contract, such as seeking specific performance (compelling the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations) or seeking rescission (cancelling the contract and restoring both parties to their pre-contract positions). The availability of these remedies will depend on the nature of the breach and the feasibility of such relief.

To read more about Breach of Contract click here

https://brainly.com/question/29891945

#SPJ11

On a standard traffic light, the green light is positioned at the bottom.

The configuration of a standard traffic light consists of three lights arranged vertically: red at the top, yellow or amber in the middle, and green at the bottom. This arrangement is consistent across many countries and serves as a universally recognized system for traffic control. Placing the green light at the bottom allows for easy visibility and differentiation from the other lights. When the green light is illuminated, it signals to drivers that they have the right of way and can proceed safely through the intersection. This positioning helps ensure clarity and promotes efficient traffic flow.

To read more about Traffic Light click here

https://brainly.com/question/28218389

#SPJ11

A bench trial may occur in situation A, where the defendant waives his or her right to a trial by jury.

In the United States, defendants generally have the right to a trial by jury as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution. However, defendants also have the option to waive this right and instead opt for a bench trial. In a bench trial, the judge acts as the fact-finder and determines guilt or innocence, rather than a jury.

The decision to waive a jury trial and proceed with a bench trial is typically made by the defendant, often in consultation with their attorney. There can be various reasons for choosing a bench trial, such as a belief that the judge may be more impartial or knowledgeable about the legal issues involved in the case.

Option B, "crime-control," is not directly related to the occurrence of a bench trial. Option C, "there is probable cause to formally charge the defendant with the crime," pertains to the decision to charge the defendant, but it does not determine whether a bench trial or jury trial will take place.

To read more about Sixth Amendment click here

https://brainly.com/question/905718

#SPJ11

Several conditions might favor stealing cars instead of robbing banks such as ease of access.

Ease of access: Stealing cars can be relatively easier than robbing banks, as banks are typically heavily secured with advanced security systems and trained personnel. Cars, on the other hand, can be targets of opportunity, especially if they are left unattended or have minimal security measures.

Lower risk: Stealing cars generally involves a lower risk of being caught or encountering resistance compared to robbing banks, which can involve armed guards and alarm systems. Car theft can be perceived as a less confrontational and less dangerous crime.

Potential for quick profit: Stolen cars can be quickly sold or stripped for parts, providing immediate financial gain. The black market for stolen cars or car parts can be lucrative, and the transactions can be conducted with relative anonymity.

Lower legal consequences: Depending on jurisdiction, the penalties for car theft may be less severe compared to bank robbery. Car theft may be classified as a lesser offense or carry lighter sentences, leading some individuals to choose this option to minimize potential legal consequences.

It is important to note that engaging in any form of criminal activity is illegal and unethical. This response is provided for informational purposes only and does not endorse or encourage illegal behavior.

To know more about theft, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10631788

#SPJ11

No, the above statement is false. While Romania has taken significant measures to combat cybercrime and has established a reputation for its efforts in this area, it is not considered the country with the strictest cybercrime laws.

Several countries have enacted robust legislation and established comprehensive frameworks to address cybercrime. Countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Singapore are often recognized for their stringent cybercrime laws and proactive measures in combating cyber threats. These countries have enacted legislation that covers a wide range of cyber offenses and provide strong legal frameworks for investigation, prosecution, and prevention of cybercrime.

It is important to note that cybercrime laws and their enforcement vary from country to country, and the perception of which country has the strictest laws can be subjective. Nonetheless, Romania's efforts in combating cybercrime are commendable, but it is not considered the country with the strictest cybercrime laws.

To learn more about cybercrime laws, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30457725

#SPJ11

The authority to initiate legal suits to enforce antitrust laws lies with both the U.S. Justice Department and private citizens.

The correct answer is option A - Both the U.S. Justice Department and private citizens have the authority to initiate legal suits to enforce antitrust laws.

Antitrust laws are designed to promote fair competition and protect consumers from monopolies or other anti-competitive practices. These laws are enforced by the U.S. government through the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as well as by private citizens who can bring lawsuits against companies they believe are engaging in anti-competitive behavior.

The DOJ has the power to launch investigations into potential antitrust violations, and can file lawsuits against companies that it believes have violated antitrust laws. Private citizens, on the other hand, can also file lawsuits against companies for antitrust violations, seeking damages for harm caused by anti-competitive behavior.

In summary, while both the U.S. Justice Department and private citizens have the authority to initiate legal suits to enforce antitrust laws, the DOJ has broader powers and resources to investigate and prosecute antitrust violations.

Learn more about authority to initiate legal

brainly.com/question/13913757

#SPJ11

The Education Act of 2013 has had a significant influence on curriculum change in Kenya. The Act introduced various provisions that aimed to improve the quality and relevance of education in the country.

Here are some ways in which the Education Act of 2013 has influenced curriculum change in Kenya:

1. Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC): One of the key changes brought about by the Education Act of 2013 is the adoption of a Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC). This curriculum shift focuses on developing learners' practical skills, knowledge, and attitudes to enhance their overall competency and prepare them for the demands of the 21st century. The Act provided a legal framework for the implementation of the CBC, emphasizing a learner-centered approach and a shift from content-based education to competency-based learning.

2. Emphasis on Continuous Assessment: The Education Act of 2013 emphasized the importance of continuous assessment in evaluating learners' progress and performance. The Act highlighted the need for ongoing assessment methods that take into account learners' diverse abilities, skills, and talents. This shift from a heavy reliance on high-stakes examinations to continuous assessment has influenced curriculum change by encouraging a more holistic and comprehensive evaluation of learners' capabilities.

3. Inclusion and Special Needs Education: The Act also prioritized inclusive education and the provision of quality education for learners with special needs. It mandated the development of an inclusive education policy, ensuring that learners with disabilities or special needs are not excluded from accessing education. This emphasis on inclusion has led to changes in the curriculum to accommodate diverse learners, providing support systems, adaptations, and resources to cater to their individual needs.

4. Strengthening Teacher Training and Professional Development: The Education Act of 2013 recognized the critical role of teachers in delivering quality education. It mandated the establishment of the Teacher Service Commission and emphasized the need for continuous teacher training and professional development. This focus on teacher quality and professional growth has influenced curriculum change by promoting effective pedagogical approaches, innovative teaching methods, and the incorporation of new teaching technologies in the curriculum.

Overall, the Education Act of 2013 has played a significant role in driving curriculum change in Kenya. It has brought about the adoption of a Competency-Based Curriculum, promoted continuous assessment, fostered inclusion and special needs education, and strengthened teacher training and professional development. These changes aim to enhance the quality, relevance, and inclusivity of education in Kenya, equipping learners with the skills and knowledge needed for their personal and professional development.

To learn more about Education Act of 2013, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32122787

#SPJ11