Why did manufacturers hire children to work in their factories?
O Factory owners could pay children less money than they paid adults.
O Children were able to complete more work than adults.
O Children could work for eight hours per day.
O Factory owners expected children to do demanding physical labor.
E
Answer:
The main reason factory owners hired children was because they could pay children lower wages than adults. This is summarized in the first option:
Factory owners could pay children less money than they paid adults.
Children were paid much lower wages than adults for the same work, making child labor cheaper for factory owners. The other options are not supported as reasons factory owners hired children:
Children were able to complete more work than adults. - There is no evidence this was the case.
Children could work for eight hours per day. - Both children and adults often worked long hours in factories.
Factory owners expected children to do demanding physical labor. - Children were often hired for less physically demanding work; however, they still faced difficult and unhealthy working conditions.
So the key reason was that factory owners could pay children lower wages, making child labor an economically attractive option for them. The often exploitative and hazardous nature of child labor led to reforms and child labor laws in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Manufacturers hired children in their factories largely because they could pay them less than adults. These children were also used for specific tasks that were harder for adults to perform due to their size. However, it was mainly a cost-saving strategy.
Explanation:Historically, many manufacturers hired children to work in their factories because they could pay them significantly less than adult workers. This practice, known as child labor, was common during the Industrial Revolution. In addition, smaller and more agile, children were often used to perform specific tasks that adults found difficult, such as maneuvering between tight spaces in textile factories. However, this does not mean that children were capable of doing more work or harder physical labor than adults; it was more about economic benefit for the factory owners.
Learn more about Child Labor here:https://brainly.com/question/30412218
#SPJ2
This timeline shows the settlement of North America.
Timeline of the settlement of North America from 1500 to 1800. 1520 is labeled A, 1608 is labeled B, 1607 is labeled C, and 1756 to 1763 is labeled D.
Which choice accurately fills in the timeline in order?
Quebec was founded, Jamestown was founded, and the Seven Years’ War was fought.
Virginia was founded, Quebec was founded, and the French and Indian War was fought.
Jamestown was founded, Quebec was founded, and the Seven Years’ War was fought.
The Virginia Commonwealth was founded, New France was founded, and the French and Indian War was fought.
Answer Question 1 or 2 optional. I'm Just curious on what the people of the world think on this topic I have a deep love for comparing hypothetical situations.
1. If Abraham Lincoln would have never been assassinated om April 15, 1865 list 5 A, B, C, D, E. lasting affects this change of course of actions that occurred on this date in history would of had on todays society.
2. If John F Kennedy would have never been assassinated on November 22, 1963 List 7 affects this change of course of actions that occurred on this date in history would of had on the years spanning 1963-2000.
1. A) Possible influence on Reconstruction policies. B) Impact on Civil Rights Movement. C) Potential changes in foreign policy. D) Altered historical narrative. E) Shift in presidential succession.
2. A) Potential changes in Vietnam War policies. B) Altered space exploration initiatives. C) Shift in civil rights advancements. D) Potential influence on Cold War dynamics. E) Changes in economic policies. F) Altered presidential succession. G) Shift in public perception of government.
If John F. Kennedy had not been assassinated on November 22, 1963, the following effects might have shaped the years spanning 1963-2000:
Potential changes in Vietnam War policies: Kennedy had begun taking steps towards de-escalation before his assassination. His continued leadership could have influenced the war's course and potentially led to an earlier resolution.Altered space exploration initiatives: Kennedy's vision of landing a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s might have been further emphasized. This could have accelerated space exploration efforts and potentially shaped advancements in technology and scientific research.Shift in civil rights advancements: Kennedy was a proponent of civil rights, and his continued presidency might have resulted in further legislative progress and a more expedited advancement of equal rights for African Americans.Potential influence on Cold War dynamics: Kennedy's approach to the Cold War, particularly his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis, showcased his diplomatic skills. His prolonged leadership could have impacted U.S.-Soviet relations and altered the global political landscape.Changes in economic policies: Kennedy's economic plans included tax cuts and increased government spending to stimulate the economy. These policies might have continued, potentially shaping economic growth and fiscal strategies.Altered presidential succession: Kennedy's assassination led to Lyndon B. Johnson assuming the presidency. Without the assassination, the subsequent presidents and their policies would have been different, potentially influencing domestic and foreign affairs.Shift in public perception of government: Kennedy's charismatic leadership style and ability to inspire the public could have continued to shape public trust and engagement with the government, potentially impacting societal attitudes towards politics and leadership.It is important to note that these effects are speculative, as they depend on various factors and the complex dynamics of historical events.
For more such question on Vietnam War
https://brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ8
How and why did economic development contribute to regional differences in shape original tires in the early 1800s ?
In the early 1800s, economic development played a significant role in shaping regional differences in the United States. This, in turn, influenced the types and sizes of original tires used during that period. Here's how economic development contributed to these regional differences:
Agricultural vs. Industrial Economies: The United States was transitioning from an agrarian society to a more industrialized one during the early 1800s. The level of economic development varied across regions, with the North and Northeast experiencing greater industrialization, while the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production.
Transportation Infrastructure: Economic development influenced the availability and quality of transportation infrastructure in different regions. The North and Northeast, with their burgeoning industrial economies, invested heavily in transportation systems such as canals, roads, and eventually railroads. This facilitated the movement of goods and people, creating a demand for more durable and efficient tires.
Regional Manufacturing Capabilities: The level of industrialization and manufacturing capabilities varied across regions. The North and Northeast had a more robust manufacturing sector, producing a wider range of goods, including tires. This gave them access to a variety of tire options, including those made of more advanced materials or with improved designs.
Agricultural Needs: The South, with its primarily agrarian economy, had different transportation requirements compared to the industrialized regions. The South relied heavily on the use of wagons for transporting agricultural products, such as cotton, tobacco, and other crops. The terrain and road conditions in the South also influenced the types of tires that were suitable for those purposes.
Local Availability of Resources: Economic development also affected the availability of resources in different regions. For example, the North had better access to iron and steel production, which could be used in the manufacturing of stronger and more durable tires. The South, on the other hand, had limited access to these resources, which could have influenced the types of tires available in the region.
Cultural and Social Factors: Economic development and regional differences also had cultural and social implications. The North, with its industrialized economy, had a more diverse population and was more influenced by European technology and advancements. This could have led to greater adoption of newer tire technologies and designs compared to the South, which had a more agrarian and rural society.
Overall, economic development, transportation infrastructure, regional manufacturing capabilities, agricultural needs, resource availability, and cultural factors all contributed to the regional differences in the types and sizes of original tires used in the early 1800s. These differences reflected the distinct economic and social landscapes of the different regions within the United States at that time.
What do Christians believe about Jesus’s relationship to god
Answer:
Christians believe that Jesus has a unique and special relationship with God
Explanation:
According to Christian theology, Jesus is considered the Son of God and is believed to be fully divine while also being fully human. Christians hold the belief in the doctrine of the Trinity, which states that God exists as three persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit.
Christians believe that Jesus is the second person of the Trinity, co-eternal with God the Father. They believe that Jesus, through his incarnation, lived a perfect and sinless life on Earth, demonstrating God's love and providing a way for humanity to be reconciled with God. Christians believe that Jesus's sacrificial death on the cross paid the price for the sins of humanity, and through faith in Jesus, individuals can have forgiveness of sins and eternal life.
In summary, Christians believe that Jesus is the divine Son of God, who took on human form to save humanity and reconcile them with God. He is seen as the mediator between God and humanity, embodying God's love and offering salvation to those who believe in him.
The Fed has conducted expansionary monetary policy to combat a recession but is running up against the zero lower bound, and
the economy is still not recovering. What other steps could the government take to try to stabilize the economy?
Steps the government could take to stabilize the economy Steps the government should not or cannot take to stabilize
the economy
lower taxes
increase government spending
increase transfer payments
lower real interest rates
Search
Answer Bank
raise taxes
decrease government spending
decrease transfer payments
raise real interest rates
When the Federal Reserve is conducting expansionary monetary policy to combat a recession but is running up against the zero lower bounds, and the economy is still not recovering, the government can take other steps to stabilize the economy.
These steps include Lower taxes increasing government spending increasing transfer payments lower real interest rates.
Steps the government should not or cannot take to stabilize the economy include: Raising taxes Decrease government spending decrease transfer payments to rise real interest rates this is because in the situation of the Federal Reserve conducting expansionary monetary policy to combat a recession but is running up against the zero lower bounds, and the economy is still not recovering, the government needs to take steps to stimulate economic activity and promote spending.
Therefore, lowering taxes, increasing government spending, increasing transfer payments, and lowering real interest rates can all help to boost the economy. On the other hand, raising taxes, decreasing government spending, decreasing transfer payments, and raising real interest rates can have the opposite effect of reducing economic activity and worsening the recession.
For more questions on: Federal Reserve
https://brainly.com/question/27217598
#SPJ8
How does the classical Greek legal tradition compare with that of classical
Rome?
A. Both were voted on directly by citizens, who helped propose and
revise laws.
B. The Greek legal system was presided over by magistrates, but the
Roman system was led by pontiffs.
C. The Greek legal system was presided over by appointed officials,
but the Roman system was led by elected officials.
OD. Both were based on a written record of laws that was organized
into categories.
SUBMIT
Answer:
C. The Greek legal system was presided over by appointed officials, but the Roman system was led by elected officials.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. In the classical Greek legal tradition, the legal system was presided over by appointed officials, such as magistrates or judges, who were responsible for interpreting and enforcing the laws. These officials were chosen from among the citizens or appointed by higher authorities.
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been seen eating at McDonald's in rural towns across the United States. She has also recently been photographed shopping for groceries at Walmart in many poor cities across the United States. Many suggest that she is trying to blend in with America's middle class. What propaganda technique is this candidate using?
Answer:
Plain folks is the type of propaganda.
Explanation:
Because she gives the idea that she is the same as every one else
Using the outline you created, write a one-paragraph editorial commenting on the opinion you have chosen to defend.
The title: Polk's Bold Promises and Visionary Leadership In the 1844 presidential campaign, James K. Polk stood as a beacon of hope, offering a bold vision for the expansion and progress of the United States.
His promises to annex Texas, acquire Oregon, lower tariffs, establish an independent treasury, and serve only one term exemplified his determination to shape a stronger nation.
Polk's unwavering commitment to Manifest Destiny demonstrated his foresight and leadership in propelling America forward.
His successful fulfillment of key campaign promises, such as the annexation of Texas and the Oregon Treaty, solidified his legacy as a president who took decisive action to secure American interests.
Moreover, his dedication to free trade and an independent treasury system showcased his understanding of economic principles and his desire to create a stable and prosperous nation.
While some may argue that the means by which Polk achieved his goals were contentious, it cannot be denied that he delivered on his campaign pledges, leaving a lasting impact on American expansionism.
James K. Polk's presidency serves as a testament to the power of vision, determination, and decisive leadership in shaping the destiny of a nation.
His campaign promises were not mere rhetoric, but a roadmap to progress, and his actions as president transformed the United States into a formidable force on the world stage.
For similar questions on Visionary Leadership
https://brainly.com/question/19321451
#SPJ8
The title: Polk's Bold Promises and Visionary Leadership In the 1844 presidential campaign, James K. Polk stood as a beacon of hope, offering a bold vision for the expansion and progress of the United States.
His promises to annex Texas, acquire Oregon, lower tariffs, establish an independent treasury, and serve only one term exemplified his determination to shape a stronger nation.
Polk's unwavering commitment to Manifest Destiny demonstrated his foresight and leadership in propelling America forward.
His successful fulfillment of key campaign promises, such as the annexation of Texas and the Oregon Treaty, solidified his legacy as a president who took decisive action to secure American interests.
Moreover, his dedication to free trade and an independent treasury system showcased his understanding of economic principles and his desire to create a stable and prosperous nation.
While some may argue that the means by which Polk achieved his goals were contentious, it cannot be denied that he delivered on his campaign pledges, leaving a lasting impact on American expansionism.
James K. Polk's presidency serves as a testament to the power of vision, determination, and decisive leadership in shaping the destiny of a nation.
His campaign promises were not mere rhetoric, but a roadmap to progress, and his actions as president transformed the United States into a formidable force on the world stage.
For similar questions on Visionary Leadership
brainly.com/question/19321451
#SPJ8
What is ironic about the ending of the poem “ Richard Cory” by Edwin Arlington Robinson
Answer:
The irony of the ending of "Richard Cory" lies in the contrast between the outward appearance of a wealthy and respected man and the reality of his inner life, which ultimately leads him to take his own life, challenging the idea that material success and social status bring happiness and fulfillment.
Explanation:
The poem "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson tells the story of a wealthy and respected man named Richard Cory who is admired by everyone in his town. However, in the last line of the poem, it is revealed that Richard Cory "went home and put a bullet through his head."
The irony of the ending lies in the contrast between the outward appearance of Richard Cory and the reality of his inner life. Despite his wealth, good looks, and social status, Richard Cory is revealed to be deeply unhappy and ultimately takes his own life. The poem suggests that material success and social status do not necessarily bring happiness or satisfaction, and that appearances can be deceiving.
The poem's ironic twist serves to challenge the idea that wealth and status automatically bring happiness and fulfillment, and highlights the importance of inner peace and contentment.
Which statement best completes the diagram to show the events that led to
the writing of the Declaration of Independence?
Thomas Paine's
Common Sense is
published.
Town hall
meetings call for
independence
from Great
Britain.
?
OA. Patriots organize Committees of Correspondence to outline
grievances against Britain.
B. Thomas Jefferson argues for a document that outlines a
republican form of government.
C. Leaders at the Second Continental Congress decide to declare
independence from Britain.
D. Colonists gather in large numbers to agree to a mass boycott of all
British imported goods.
The statement that best completes the diagram is ''Patriots organize Committees of Correspondence to outline grievances against Britain''. So, the correct choice is option A.
The events that led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence can be represented in a chronological sequence.
First, Thomas Paine's influential pamphlet, Common Sense, is published, which helps shape public opinion and promotes the idea of independence from Great Britain. As a result, town hall meetings are held, where the call for independence gains momentum and support among the colonists. In response to this growing sentiment, Patriots organize Committees of Correspondence, as stated in option A, to outline and document the grievances and injustices committed by Britain.This step is crucial as it helps unite the colonies and lays the groundwork for a collective action against British rule.Eventually, these developments culminate in the decision made by the leaders at the Second Continental Congress to declare independence from Britain, leading to the writing and adoption of the Declaration of Independence.
For more questions on Patriots
https://brainly.com/question/29196768
#SPJ8
Compare the administrative measures of alauddin khilji with those introduced by Muhammad Tughluq.
Alauddin Khilji and Muhammad Tughluq were both prominent rulers in medieval India, known for their administrative measures. While there are similarities in some of their policies, there are also notable differences between the two. Here is a comparison of their administrative measures:
Revenue Reforms:
Alauddin Khilji: He implemented a system called the "Ghiyas-ud-Din Tughlaq's system" to streamline revenue collection. He introduced the "measurement of land" and imposed a fixed tax on agricultural produce.
Muhammad Tughluq: He introduced the token currency system known as the "Token currency of Delhi" to replace the existing currency. However, this measure faced significant challenges and was ultimately abandoned.
Market Control:
Alauddin Khilji: He introduced price controls to regulate the prices of essential commodities and prevent hoarding. This measure aimed to ensure fair prices for the common people during times of scarcity.
Muhammad Tughluq: He attempted to control the market by setting up state-controlled markets called "Shahr-i-Mandi." However, this centralized approach faced practical difficulties and was met with resistance.
Military Reforms:
Alauddin Khilji: He strengthened the military by introducing a system known as the "Chehra Chalan." This involved regular spy networks and an efficient intelligence system to maintain control over the nobility and prevent rebellions.
Muhammad Tughluq: He experimented with military reforms by recruiting soldiers from non-traditional backgrounds and using innovative tactics. However, these measures were met with mixed success.
Administrative Centralization:
Alauddin Khilji: He centralized administrative power by appointing trusted officials directly responsible to the sultan. He reduced the influence of nobles and established a strong central authority.
Muhammad Tughluq: He attempted to centralize administration through various measures, such as the transfer of the capital to Daulatabad and the implementation of a uniform administrative system. However, these efforts resulted in administrative chaos and discontent.
Overall, Alauddin Khilji focused on strengthening the military and centralizing administration, while Muhammad Tughluq had ambitious but often problematic ideas for administrative reforms. Both rulers left a lasting impact on the administrative history of medieval India, with Alauddin Khilji's measures being relatively more successful and enduring.
I hope this helps. Cheers! ^^
Using specific examples from the accounts, discuss the responses of Gronniosaw and Equiano to enslavement.
Gronniosaw and Equiano both responded to enslavement differently. Gronniosaw, in his narrative, expressed a sense of resignation and acceptance of his fate as an enslaved person, emphasizing his religious faith. For example, he described relying on God's providence and viewing his sufferings as tests of faith. Equiano actively resisted, purchasing his freedom and advocating for abolition. Equiano actively sought freedom, working towards purchasing his own freedom and becoming an abolitionist.
Gronniosaw and Equiano displayed contrasting responses to enslavement. Gronniosaw, in his narrative, appeared to accept his status as an enslaved person, finding solace in his religious beliefs and viewing his sufferings as tests of faith. He emphasized his dependence on divine providence and did not overtly express a desire for freedom or resistance. Equiano, on the other hand, actively resisted enslavement. He sought autonomy by purchasing his freedom and advocated for the abolition of slavery. Equiano's narrative highlighted his determination to escape bondage and his efforts to challenge the institution of slavery, illustrating a more proactive response to the oppressive system.To provide examples of their responses to enslavement, Gronniosaw, in his narrative, recounted moments of seeking solace in his religious faith during times of hardship and expressing his resignation to his fate as an enslaved person. Equiano, in his narrative, described his active pursuit of freedom, such as when he saved money to buy his own freedom and his involvement in the abolitionist movement through his writings and activism.These examples highlight Gronniosaw's acceptance and spiritual coping mechanism while illustrating Equiano's active resistance and determination to secure freedom.
For more questions on enslavement :
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ8
United States should or should not get involved in World war 2
Answer:
they should
Explanation:
because japan did pearl harbor so we had to
Aa Hola Tiles Timbuktu became a center for Islamic scholarship. The Ghana civilization flourished. Songhai was invaded by Moroccan soldiers. Sequence Submit
Answer:
The correct sequence is as follows:
-The Ghana civilization flourished.
-Timbuktu became a center for Islamic scholarship.
-Songhai was invaded by Moroccan soldiers.
Explanation:
The Ghana civilization refers to the ancient empire of Ghana, which existed from approximately the 4th to the 13th century in West Africa. It was known for its wealth and trading power, particularly in gold and salt.
Timbuktu, located in present-day Mali, rose to prominence as a center for Islamic scholarship during the 13th to 17th centuries. It became a hub of learning, attracting scholars and students from various parts of Africa and the Muslim world.
Songhai, another powerful empire in West Africa, experienced a period of expansion and prosperity in the 15th and 16th centuries. However, it was eventually invaded and conquered by Moroccan soldiers in the late 16th century, marking the downfall of the Songhai Empire.
Therefore, the correct sequence is: 1. The Ghana civilization flourished. 2. Timbuktu became a center for Islamic scholarship. 3. Songhai was invaded by Moroccan soldiers.
I hope this helps. Cheers! ^^
Which statement best described the effect of new technology during World War 1
Answer:
The statement that best describes the effect of new technology during World War 1 is: "New technology led to unprecedented levels of destruction and casualties, and transformed the nature of warfare."
World War I was characterized by the use of new technologies that had never been seen on the battlefield before, such as machine guns, poison gas, tanks, and airplanes. These technologies led to unprecedented levels of destruction and casualties, and transformed the nature of warfare.
Machine guns, for example, made it possible for a small number of soldiers to hold off much larger forces, leading to stalemates and trench warfare. Poison gas caused horrific injuries and deaths, and led to the development of gas masks and other protective equipment. Tanks allowed for armored assaults on enemy positions, while airplanes made it possible to gather intelligence and to engage in aerial combat.
These new technologies had a profound impact on the military strategies and tactics of the warring nations, and led to a war of attrition in which neither side was able to gain a decisive advantage. The scale of the devastation caused by these technologies also led to a sense of disillusionment and despair, and helped to pave the way for the social and political changes that would come after the war.
Overall, the new technologies of World War I had a profound and lasting impact on the course of the conflict and on the world as a whole, and helped to shape the future of warfare in the decades to come.
How do factors such as gronniosaw and equiano ages at the time of wnslavement affect their perception s of events
Answer:According to his own account, Equiano was captured in his Igbo village at age 11, sold into slavery, and taken to the West Indies
Explanation:
Gronniosaw and Equiano's ages at the time of enslavement influenced their perceptions of events, with younger individuals potentially internalizing trauma differently and older individuals having a broader contextual understanding.
Factors such as Gronniosaw and Equiano's ages at the time of enslavement can significantly influence their perceptions of events. Here's how:
1. Developmental Stage: The age at which individuals experience enslavement can shape their cognitive and emotional development. Younger individuals may be more impressionable and vulnerable, potentially internalizing the traumatic experiences and adapting to their circumstances differently than older individuals.
2. Contextual Understanding: Age can influence one's understanding of the socio-political context and the broader implications of enslavement. Older individuals might have a more nuanced understanding of power dynamics, racial oppression, and the historical context surrounding their enslavement, allowing them to perceive events through a more informed lens.
3. Personal Resilience: Individuals' ability to cope with and interpret traumatic experiences can vary based on age. Younger individuals may have different coping mechanisms and psychological resilience compared to older individuals, impacting how they process and recall events related to their enslavement.
4. Shifting Perspectives: As individuals age, their perspectives can evolve. This includes reflections on their experiences, the impact of slavery on their lives, and their understanding of broader societal issues. The passage of time can lead to different interpretations and reflections on events, influencing their perceptions as they mature.
It is important to consider these factors when analyzing the narratives and perspectives of individuals like Gronniosaw and Equiano. Their age at the time of enslavement can shape their experiences, memories, interpretations, and subsequent writings about their lives, providing unique insights into the varied impacts of slavery on individuals at different stages of life.
For more questions on enslavement :
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ8
In the late 1800's, which of the
following groups was hired for
secretarial work?
A. women
B. men
C. children
D. slaves
The women was hired for secretarial work in the late 1800's. The Option A.
Which group was primarily hired for secretarial work in the late 1800s?During the late 1800s, the predominant group hired for secretarial work was women. This period marked a shift in employment opportunities for women, and secretarial work became one of the few professional roles available to them.
As the demand for administrative assistance grew, women started to fill these positions in offices, businesses and government agencies. They proved to be highly capable in tasks such as typing, shorthand, organizing documents and managing correspondence.
Read more about secretarial work
brainly.com/question/15209182
#SPJ1
What were economic considerations that surround slavery contributed to the dissolution of the union over the period of early American history?
forced migration of African throughout the world
Answer: The transatlantic slave trade
Explanation: The transatlantic slave trade was the largest forced migration in history, and incontrovertibly one of the most inhumane. The extensive exodus of Africans spread to many areas of the world over a 400-year period, and was unprecedented in the annals of recorded human history.
Help please friends I need to do a signature assignment
1. Utilize the discussion board readings from WWII and the 1950s.
2. During World War II and the Cold War, Homefront conflicts were numerous and ranged from
questions about civil rights and social justice to cultural disagreements. To what extent and how did the wars shaped the Homefront in the 1940s and 1950s.
Choose two examples from each military engagement (options for WWII are the Jewish
refugee crisis, African American civil rights, and ethnic Mexican agricultural workers and options for the Cold War are youth rebellion, gender equality, and cultural rejection of
mainstream mores). Describe the nature of each, assessing how each was shaped by the war.
3. Assignments need to have a minimum of six (6) direct quotations from the primary source
reading documents, consisting of multiple viewpoints/speakers (i.e. not all should be from the
same title/speaker/source)
4. All references must be cited using footnotes or a penalty will be assessed (see page 2)
The best papers will use the primary documents to develop your answer. Please note that for
each body paragraph there should be at least two or three substantive points developed.
Two conflicts and how they were shaped by the war are:
Jewish refugee crisis: This sprang forth from the Holocaust where Adolf Hitler, a German leader caused the extermination of many Jews, thus causing them to flee to other countries.
American Civil War: Although many African Americans joined the whites in fighting during the war, they were still racially discriminated thus causing them to fight for their rights and freedom.
How the conflicts were shaped by the warThe conflicts mentioned above were shaped by the war in many ways. First, the Jews faced an extermination that was led by the German leader, Adolf Hitler.
In addition to this, the American Civil War saw the involvement of many African Americans who were still discriminated against, thus causing them to fight for their rights.
Learn more about the Jewish Refugee Crisis here:
https://brainly.com/question/30053754
#SPJ1
why European nations come to america?
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
Europe is a continent in the W part of the landmass lying between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, separated from Asia by the Ural Mountains on the E and the Caucasus Mountains and the Black and Caspian seas on the SE. In British usage, Europe sometimes contrasts with England. About 4,017,000 sq. mi. (10,404,000 sq. km.).
America, or the United States, is a republic in the N Western Hemisphere comprising of 48 conterminous states, the District of Columbia, Alaska in North America, the Hawaii in the N Pacific. Conterminous United States, 3,022,387 sq. mi. (7,827,982 sq. km.); with Alaska and Hawaii, 3, 615, 122 sq. mi. (9,363,166 sq. mi.). Capital: Washington, D.C.
There’s not really one simple explanation. The only two European powers who coordinated their colonial efforts early on were Portugal and Spain, the rest was mostly uncoordinated chaos, looking for new wealth. Initially it was to explore, learn new things about the world, and open trade routes to Asia. European powers had been in trade with China and India along the Silk Road since before Roman times, but after the 1100s, sea travel had improved to the point that European countries were trading with each other faster along sea routes than land routes, and sea traffic was now the quicker and more efficient method. This hid effects all over Europe. More inland, Eastern countries, became poorer than their western and Scandinavian counterparts, who were more likely to be on peninsulas surrounded by ocean with plenty of ports. The Hanseatic League became a real power along the narrow inlets all over Northern Europe, and the Republic of Venice also did, but along the opposite body of water. Getting to East Asia via the sea though around Africa was a very long cumbersome journey, so trade continued through Central Asia and the Middle East into Anatolia, then across the Dardanelles to Constantinople, and then along the Mediterranean. The silk road was disrupted by a combination of the Ottoman Conquest of Constantinople (see Fall of Constantinople), a few decades before Spain commissioned explorers to find a new route to Asia, and the slow collapse of the various Mongol Empires left over from Genghis Khan’s conquests. Afterwards, every bit of trade coming out of Asia into Europe directly paid the Ottoman Empire through taxes, a Muslim power which was conquering Christian kingdoms all over Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean. Trade also became much more expensive, partly due to more taxation along the trade routes, and also due to the collapse of the Feudal system after the Bubonic Plague, and increased demand as a larger and larger proportion of the population could now own land, currency, and buy things. In England, the collapse of feudalism and spike in wages caused prices to spike by so much, that the government tried suppressing the movement of English subjects through the Statute of Laborer's 1351. When Europeans set out in search of a route to Asia, they didn’t even necessarily expect to find land between Europe and Asia, let alone populations of exploitable people with less technology and immunity to disease. Soon after the Spanish and Portuguese discovered the Americas, they began trying to get as much gold back to Europe as possible, justified with orders from the church to convert the locals. This new Spanish and Portuguese gold had the effect of lowering the overall value of gold in Europe, as more supply was introduced. Other European kingdoms were suddenly poorer, or at least, their stores of wealth were not worth as much. The Netherlands circumvented this, and increased their own wealth, by navigating the long route all along Africa and India, all the way through to Indonesia. The Dutch East India Company exploded in value even more than Bitcoin has so far, by reestablishing regular trade with East Asia and bringing back rare commodities. England and France were left out of this at first. They began exploring less-densely populated areas of the Americas, to find their own gold, but France instead wound up bringing fur back to Europe, and England wound up taking land, building up farms, and shipping cotton, lumber, sugar cane, and other resources back to Europe. Russia entered into the fray very late, pursuing fur all the way through Siberia to Alaska. The colonization of the New World, prior to say…. 1750, was almost an arms race for wealth. Trade over land became more difficult and expensive, and commodities from East Asia rarer. The Bubonic Plague wiped out 1/3 of the population, making labor harder to get. The feudal system, which depended on cheap landed labor, collapsed in Western Europe, and a new class of competing free labor participated in the market for the first time in history, driving up the price of everything.
Answer: The opportunity to make money
Explanation: The opportunity to make money was one of the primary motivators for the colonization of the New World. The Virginia Company of London established the Jamestown colony to make a profit for its investors. Europe's period of exploration and colonization was fueled largely by necessity.
Article Two of the United States Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government. The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States, who also acts as head of state and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise.
The President of the United States does not have unbridled power. Checks and balances prevent the President from acting as a dictator and from signing executive orders that cannot be challenged. Answer each question below in a well-written paragraph that uses specific examples to support your responses.
1) Explain why these limits to the power of the President might be good for the country.
2) Discuss whether it is in the best interest of the country for the President to be restricted to a maximum of eight years in office. What are the arguments for limiting the number of terms a President can remain in power? What about the arguments against term limits? Do you agree that term limits should exist or not? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
1) The limits to the power of the President are good for the country because they prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual. The system of checks and balances established by the Constitution ensures that no branch of government can become too powerful and that each branch can check the power of the others. For example, Congress has the power to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote, and the Supreme Court can declare executive actions unconstitutional. These checks and balances prevent the President from becoming a dictator and ensure that the government operates within the boundaries of the Constitution. Furthermore, the requirement that the President obtain Senate approval for appointments to high-level positions ensures that the President cannot appoint unqualified or corrupt individuals to positions of power.
2) The argument for limiting the number of terms a President can serve is that it prevents the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual and ensures that power is transferred peacefully from one administration to the next. Term limits prevent a President from becoming too comfortable in office and can encourage fresh ideas and perspectives in the White House. Additionally, term limits ensure that the President remains accountable to the people and cannot use the power of the presidency to entrench themselves in power indefinitely.
The argument against term limits is that they prevent the American people from choosing the person they believe is best suited to lead the country. If a President is doing a good job, why should they be prevented from serving additional terms? Furthermore, term limits can prevent a President from fully implementing their agenda and can prevent continuity in government policies and initiatives.
Personally, I believe that term limits are necessary to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual and to ensure that power is transferred peacefully from one administration to the next. Term limits can also encourage fresh ideas and perspectives in the White House and ensure that the President remains accountable to the people. However, I also recognize that term limits can prevent a popular and effective President from serving additional terms, which is a potential disadvantage of this system. Ultimately, the decision on whether or not to have term limits should be based on a careful consideration of the costs and benefits of this system.
1) Limits to the power of the President are important for the country because they prevent the President from becoming a dictator or from abusing their power.
2) It is in the best interest of the country for the President to be restricted to a maximum of eight years in office.
1. The system of checks and balances ensures that the President's actions are subject to review and challenge by other branches of government. This helps to maintain a balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful.
For example, the Supreme Court can declare executive actions unconstitutional, while Congress can override a presidential veto or impeach the President if necessary. Additionally, limits to the President's power help to protect individual rights and liberties by preventing the government from infringing on them.
2. The arguments for limiting the number of terms a President can remain in power are that it prevents the concentration of power in one person for too long, and allows for new ideas and perspectives to be brought to the office.
Additionally, term limits prevent the President from becoming too comfortable or complacent in their position, and ensures that they are accountable to the people. The arguments against term limits are that they prevent experienced and effective Presidents from serving longer, and limit the choices available to voters.
For more such questions on President visit:
https://brainly.com/question/924435
#SPJ8
The quartering act of 1765 requires colonists to
The Quartering Act of 1765 required colonists to provide housing and provisions for British soldiers stationed in the American colonies.
The act was passed by the British Parliament as part of its efforts to maintain control over the colonies and assert its authority. Under the Quartering Act, colonial authorities were obliged to provide suitable accommodations, such as barracks or public houses, for British troops. If such accommodations were not available, private homes and buildings could be used to quarter the soldiers. The act mandated that colonists provide food, bedding, and other necessary supplies for the troops. The Quartering Act of 1765 was deeply resented by the colonists as an infringement on their rights and a burden imposed by the British government. It was one of the factors that fueled growing tensions between the colonies and Britain, ultimately leading to the American Revolution.For more such questions on Quartering Act
https://brainly.com/question/29041866
#SPJ8
Supply and demand coordinate to determine prices by working
O together.
O competitively.
with other factors.
Oseparately.
Supply and demand coordinate to determine prices by working Option A. together.
Supply and demand work together to determine prices in a market economy. The concept of supply refers to the quantity of a product or service that producers are willing and able to offer for sale at various price levels. On the other hand, demand represents the quantity of a product or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at different price levels.
When supply and demand interact in a market, they establish an equilibrium point where the quantity supplied equals the quantity demanded. This equilibrium price is the price at which buyers and sellers are willing to transact. If the price is above the equilibrium, there is excess supply, leading to downward pressure on prices as sellers compete to attract buyers. Conversely, if the price is below the equilibrium, excess demand occurs, creating upward pressure on prices as buyers compete for limited supply.
Therefore, supply and demand work together in determining prices as they influence each other and help establish an equilibrium point where market transactions occur. Therefore the correct option is A
Know more about market economy here:
https://brainly.com/question/31250743
#SPJ8
Which form of government is exercised in Ghana? Discuss
Which of the following was a lasting effect of the Atlantic slave trade, even after it was declared illegal?
A. African slavery in the Americas continued on a large scale.
B. There were not enough jobs for all of the freed Africans in Europe
and the Americas.
C. Africans were able to take back control of their native countries.
D. Slave traders moved on to exploiting indigenous peoples in the Americas.
Answer:
B. There were not enough jobs for all of the freed Africans in Europe
and the Americas.
Answer:
Option A expresses the greatest lasting effect of the Atlantic slave trade, even after it was declared illegal.
Explanation:
A. African slavery in the Americas continued on a large scale.
While Options B, C and D reference other impacts, they do not represent effects that lasted beyond the abolition of the slave trade. Consider the evidence:
B. There were not enough jobs for all of the freed Africans in Europe and the Americas.
This occupation imbalance largely concerned the immediate aftermath of abolition, without indicating a prolonged impact.
C. Africans were able to take back control of their native countries.
Sadly, Africans did not gain control of their homelands at the time the slave trade was outlawed.
D. Slave traders moved on to exploiting indigenous peoples in the Americas.
While exploitation of native peoples did occur, it does not represent an effect that lasted beyond abolition specifically.
Therefore, of the options given, only Option A identifies an impact that endured even after the slave trade was declared illegal: African slavery continued on a large scale within Americas for some time after the trade itself was abolished.
Is the following statement true or false? Most African civilizations have abandoned traditional customs.
Answer:
Explanation:
The statement "Most African civilizations have abandoned traditional customs" is false. Africa is a vast and diverse continent with numerous civilizations, cultures, and traditions. While it is true that some African societies have experienced changes and adaptations over time due to various factors such as globalization, urbanization, and cultural exchange, it is incorrect to claim that most African civilizations have abandoned their traditional customs.
Many African civilizations continue to preserve and practice their traditional customs, rituals, languages, and belief systems. These customs often play significant roles in social, religious, and cultural aspects of African communities. It is important to recognize and respect the diversity and richness of African cultures, which often maintain a strong connection to their traditional customs.
Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)
Answer:
Without knowing the specific context and dates referred to in the question, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, assuming that the question is referring to a specific event during the American Civil War, it is possible to speculate on some reasons why Jefferson Davis might have chosen not to send reinforcements to a besieged town.
During the Civil War, the Confederacy faced significant challenges in terms of resources and manpower. The Confederacy was often stretched thin, particularly in the later years of the war, and was forced to make difficult choices about where to allocate its limited resources. As a result, Davis may have decided not to send reinforcements to a besieged town because he believed that the Confederacy simply did not have the resources to spare.
Another factor that may have influenced Davis's decision was the political and military situation at the time. Depending on the specific event in question, Davis may have been facing pressure from other Confederate leaders or from the public to focus on other priorities, such as defending the capital or winning a major battle. Additionally, Davis may have been concerned about the potential consequences of sending reinforcements, such as leaving other areas vulnerable to attack or further depleting the Confederacy's already-limited resources.
Overall, the decision not to send reinforcements to a besieged town during the Civil War likely involved a complex set of factors, including resource constraints, political pressure, and military considerations.
During the American Civil War, Jefferson Davis chose not to send reinforcements to Vicksburg during the siege because the Confederate army was also facing critical battles in other regions, such as Gettysburg in the east. Davis likely prioritized allocating resources to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it difficult to provide immediate assistance to Vicksburg.
Jefferson Davis made the decision not to send reinforcements to the besieged town of Vicksburg for several reasons. Firstly, the timing of the siege coincided with other crucial battles in the American Civil War, such as the Battle of Gettysburg. Davis had to allocate resources and troops to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it challenging to provide immediate aid to Vicksburg. Secondly, the geographical obstacles presented a significant challenge. Vicksburg was located on high bluffs along the Mississippi River, making it difficult to supply and reinforce the town. Additionally, Union forces had effectively cut off the city's access to the river, further limiting the Confederacy's ability to support Vicksburg.Given these circumstances, Davis likely calculated that diverting resources from other critical fronts would be unwise and opted to concentrate efforts elsewhere.
Note: The complete question is:
Jefferson Davis called Vicksburg the "Nail that holds the Confederacy together" because it linked western Confederate states (LA, TX, AR) to eastern Confederate states. Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)
For more questions on American Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ8
Write one or two sentences describing a simile you could put in the first column of your chart. Be sure to list the two things being compared.
Simile: "Her laughter was like a symphony of joy, filling the room with its melodious notes."
"The sun sank behind the horizon like a blazing orange ball, painting the sky with hues of fire and gold."
In this simile, the two things being compared are "her laughter" and "a symphony of joy." By likening her laughter to a symphony, the writer emphasizes the beauty, harmony, and uplifting effect of her laughter. The simile suggests that her laughter has a profound impact, much like a symphony that captivates and enchants its listeners.
In this simile, the two things being compared are "the sun" and "a blazing orange ball." By using this simile, the writer vividly describes the visual spectacle of a sunset, emphasizing the intense colors and the radiant nature of the setting sun. The simile captures the awe-inspiring beauty of a sunset, evoking a sense of warmth, brilliance, and wonder.
For more such question on Simile visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25880644
#SPJ8
