how did decisions or actions in the third world influence what the u.s. or soviet union did in the cold war?

Answer:

The differences over slavery were at the core of the tensions that led to the Civil War.

In the South, the plantation economy was built on slavery. The southern elite believed slavery was a legitimate institution that they had a right to continue. They viewed the federal government as protecting their "property rights" in slaves.

The North moved away from slavery early on and developed more of an industrial economy. Most northerners came to view slavery as morally wrong and wanted it contained and eventually ended. They supported using the federal government to limit the expansion of slavery into new territories.

The Midwest was a mix of slave states like Missouri and free states. As more free states entered the Union, the political balance of power shifted against the South. This stoked fears of a federal government hostile to slavery.

The West was a key flashpoint as both sides wanted to control the expansion of slavery into new territories like Kansas, Utah and New Mexico. The struggle over whether these territories would enter the Union as free or slave states exacerbated tensions.

Together, these sectional differences over slavery's future in the U.S. - economically, morally and politically - built up over decades and eventually led to the Southern states seceding and forming the Confederacy, which in turn prompted the Civil War.

Hope this helps summarize how sectional disagreements over slavery contributed to the onset of the Civil War! Let me know if you have any other questions.

The recording system set up in Hawaii in 1903, which was originally developed by Sir Robert Torrens, is known as the Land Court system (option a). The Land Court system, also referred to as the Torrens system, is a method of land registration that aims to simplify and provide a reliable system for transferring and recording land ownership.

Under the Land Court system, land titles are registered with the court, and a certificate of title is issued to the owner. This system differs from the traditional "regular system" (option b), where land titles are recorded through deeds and conveyances. Instead of relying on the chain of title and examining past transactions, the Land Court system focuses on the validity and accuracy of the initial registration.

The Land Court system is designed to provide greater certainty and security in land transactions by guaranteeing the accuracy of the registered titles. It aims to minimize disputes and litigation by establishing a centralized and transparent record of land ownership.

In summary, the Land Court system, developed by Sir Robert Torrens, was established in Hawaii in 1903. It introduced a more streamlined and reliable method of land registration, offering greater certainty and efficiency in land transactions.

For more questions on:  ownership

https://brainly.com/question/25734244

#SPJ8

Constructing a clay dam across the river and observing its impact on the water flow reveals valuable insights.

Using clay to construct a dam across a river provides an opportunity to study the hydrological dynamics and observe how the river reacts to the obstruction. By carefully placing the clay, the flow of water can be redirected and impounded behind the dam. This controlled experiment allows for the examination of changes in water velocity, sediment deposition, and channel morphology.

The observation of these phenomena contributes to a better understanding of river behavior and the effects of human interventions. It also provides insights into flood mitigation strategies, water resource management, and ecosystem health. The results obtained from such an experiment can be valuable for engineers, environmental scientists, and policymakers alike.

To learn more about insights follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/33553775

#SPJ4

Answer:

The ceremony you are referring to is likely the Osiris Festival, which was held over a period of nearly 2,000 years beginning around 2500 BCE in Abydos to honor the Egyptian god Osiris.

Some key details:

• Osiris was the god of the afterlife and the underworld in Egyptian mythology. He was regarded as the ruler of the dead and the first mummy.

• The Osiris Festival centered around reenacting the mythology of Osiris - his death at the hands of his brother Set, his resurrection by his wife Isis, and his role as lord of the underworld.

• The festival was held annually in the city of Abydos, which was closely associated with Osiris. Abydos contained numerous temples dedicated to Osiris and was an important site of pilgrimage.

• The festival likely featured prayers, songs, rituals, processions, reenactments and offerings to honor Osiris and ensure the fertility and bounty of the Nile. It drew pilgrims from all over Egypt.

• The Osiris Festival was celebrated over a very long period spanning the Old, Middle and New Kingdoms of ancient Egypt. This attests to the enduring importance of Osiris as a deity and the stability of Egyptian religious beliefs.

So in all likelihood, the ceremony you refer to that was performed for nearly 2,000 years beginning around 2500 BCE in Abydos was the Osiris Festival, held to honor the Egyptian god Osiris and reenact the rituals associated with his mythology.

Answer:

The correct answer is B. Water

At the turn of the century, women all around the world, regardless of their status, were disenfranchised. Women had little to no voice in the decisions that would impact their lives, the world was dominated by men, and the political structure was heavily influenced by male perspectives.

Women recognized their lack of political influence and began to advocate for their right to vote, which would not only lead to political equality but also a voice in the decision-making process. As a result, Suffrage became an important issue and one worth fighting for, as it not only gave women political power, but it also addressed the issue of gender inequality in the country. In addition, suffrage was seen as a way of attaining economic security.

Women believed that through their right to vote, they could achieve better wages, improved working conditions, and the ability to control their lives. Without suffrage, they were often forced to rely on male partners for financial support, making them vulnerable to abusive partners.

Suffrage was also linked to the social roles and the right of self-determination. Women were tired of being viewed as nothing more than homemakers and wanted to be recognized as valuable members of society.

To know more about impact visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10228184

#SPJ11

While race became a significant factor in justifying slavery in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, in the earlier period of the slave trade, Europeans argued that Africans could be enslaved because they didn't practice the Christian religion.

Europeans believed that non-Christian Africans were "heathens" and saw their conversion to Christianity as a means of salvation and civilization. This ideological perspective allowed Europeans to rationalize the enslavement and forced labor of Africans, as they believed it was their duty to bring Christianity and civilization to these supposedly "uncivilized" peoples. Religion served as a tool to dehumanize Africans and justify their exploitation and subjugation in the early era of the slave trade.

Learn more about slavery here

https://brainly.com/question/20114242

#SPJ4

Answer: The Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan (Prince Khurram) built the Taj Mahal but did not kill his brothers. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

Option B is incorrect because Shah Jahan did not invade India from Nepal. He was born in India and ruled as the Mughal Emperor in India.

Option C is incorrect because Mordor is a fictional place in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings and has no connection to Shah Jahan or the Mughal Empire.

Option D is incorrect because Shah Jahan did not kill his brothers. He was involved in a power struggle with his brothers for the throne after the death of their father, Emperor Jahangir. Ultimately, Shah Jahan emerged as the winner and became the fifth Mughal Emperor of India.

Therefore, the correct answer is A.

Answer:

The correct answer is O. Nineteenth Amendment

Answer:

In April 1864, the Senate, responding in part to an active abolitionist petition campaign, passed the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery in the United States. Opposition from Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented the amendment from receiving the required two-thirds majority, and the bill failed.

Explanation:

American leaders supported imperialism for several main reasons. These included economic interests, desire for strategic military bases, spreading American values and culture, and a belief in the superiority of American civilization.

American leaders in the late 19th and early 20th centuries had various motivations for supporting imperialism. One of the primary reasons was economic interests. They saw overseas territories as potential sources of raw materials, new markets for American goods, and opportunities for investment

. By expanding their influence and control over foreign territories, American leaders believed they could strengthen the country's economy and increase its global power.

Another key factor was the desire for strategic military bases. As the United States emerged as a world power, having naval bases and coaling stations around the world became crucial for maintaining military dominance and protecting American interests abroad. Imperialism provided the means to establish and maintain such military presence in strategic locations.

Additionally, American leaders saw imperialism as a way to spread American values and culture. They believed in the idea of American exceptionalism and viewed the United States as a model of democracy and progress. By extending American influence, they aimed to bring the benefits of American civilization to other nations, promoting democracy, Christianity, and modernization.

learn more about imperialism:

https://brainly.com/question/26540071

#SPJ4

The definition of War, Technology and Religion as outlined in the Lecture notes is as follows.

War: War refers to organized and often violent conflicts between different groups or nations, typically involving the use of force and weaponry. It can be driven by various factors such as territorial disputes, ideological differences, competition for resources, or power struggles. War has been a recurrent feature of human history and has had significant social, political, and economic consequences.

Technology: Technology encompasses the tools, techniques, skills, and knowledge used to solve practical problems and achieve specific goals. It involves the application of scientific principles to create or improve upon existing systems, devices, and processes. Technology can range from simple tools like stone implements to complex machinery and digital systems. It has played a crucial role in shaping human civilization by enabling advancements in various fields such as agriculture, industry, communication, transportation, and medicine.

Religion: Religion refers to a system of beliefs, rituals, and practices that revolve around the worship of supernatural beings or forces. It provides a framework for understanding the nature of existence, moral values, and the purpose of life. Religions often involve the concept of a higher power or divine being and provide guidelines for ethical conduct and social interactions. They can be organized around specific scriptures, doctrines, and religious institutions.

The Neolithic Revolution, also known as the Agricultural Revolution, marked a significant shift in human society from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled farming communities. Jared Diamond's theory of unconscious coevolutionary processes suggests that the development of agriculture and domestication of plants and animals was a result of gradual environmental changes and human adaptation. As certain regions experienced favorable climatic conditions and the availability of suitable plant and animal species, early human populations began to cultivate crops and engage in animal husbandry.

The shift to agriculture brought about fundamental changes in human society and the landscape of Western civilization. It led to the establishment of permanent settlements, as people no longer needed to constantly move in search of food. This sedentary lifestyle allowed for the development of more complex social structures, as well as the accumulation of surplus resources. With surplus food production, specialized roles and divisions of labor emerged, leading to the development of crafts, trade, and the growth of interconnected communities.

The transition to agriculture also resulted in population growth, as more reliable food sources could support larger numbers of people. Increased population density and the establishment of settled communities created the conditions for the emergence of complex civilizations. As societies grew and interacted, advancements in technology, trade networks, governance systems, and cultural expressions flourished.

The videos "Guns, Germs, and Steel" and "Birth of Civilisation" explore the factors that contributed to the rise of civilizations in different regions of the world. They highlight the role of geographic factors, such as the availability of domesticable plant and animal species, access to suitable climate and resources, and the presence of navigable rivers or trade routes. These factors, along with technological innovations, cultural diffusion, and social dynamics, shaped the development of civilizations.

In conclusion, the Neolithic Revolution brought about a transformation in human societies through the adoption of agriculture. It led to the establishment of settled communities, the growth of population, the emergence of specialized roles, and the development of complex civilizations. The theories proposed by Jared Diamond and the insights from the videos and texts provide valuable perspectives on the coevolution of agriculture, technology, and social structures that have shaped Western civilization.

To learn more about Technology, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9171028

#SPJ11

The factors that made it difficult for Kennedy to act on civil rights are:

Kennedy was the 35th president of the United States. Kennedy had many difficulties and reasons that made it hard for him to work on civil rights while he was president.

In terms of Political opposition : Kennedy was working in a situation where politics was intense, and civil rights was a topic that caused a lot of disagreement and conflict. Many Southern Democrats in Congress, who had a lot of power, strongly disagreed with civil rights reforms. Kennedy had to be careful while moving through the political environment to make sure he didn't upset important groups in his own party and put his larger plans at risk.

Read more about  civil rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/131269

#SPJ4

In this scenario, the rational solution for cooperation between the US and Russia in the nuclear no-proliferation agreement would be achieved if X is equal to 200.

This is because if both countries cooperate, they receive a payoff of 1000 each, which is the highest possible outcome for both parties. If X is less than 200, it would be more beneficial for one country to defect and receive a higher payoff compared to cooperating.

However, if X is greater than 200, it would be more advantageous for both countries to defect and maximize their individual payoffs, resulting in a lower overall outcome.

Therefore, cooperation is the rational choice when X is equal to 200.

To know more about Russia :

https://brainly.com/question/9695945

#SPJ11

The founders were likely to take the lessons of fairness and impartiality, which were part of Augustine's ideas on just and unjust ruling when designing a civil government.


The lessons that the founders were likely to take from Augustine's perspective on ruling the just and unjust alike when designing a civil government include:  
1. Impartiality and fairness: Augustine's idea on just and unjust ruling was based on fairness and impartiality. He believed that both the just and unjust should be ruled the same way. The founders were likely to take this lesson and create a government that ensures fairness to all, regardless of their social, political, or economic status.

2. Accountability: Augustine believed that those who govern should be accountable to the people they govern. This idea is crucial in a democracy, and it is likely that the founders would have taken this lesson and created a system of government that is accountable to the citizens.

3. Rule of Law: Augustine believed in the rule of law and that the law should be applied equally to all. This idea is also central to a democracy, and it is likely that the founders would have taken this lesson and created a government that upholds the rule of law.

Augustine's ideas on just and unjust ruling were centered around fairness and impartiality. He believed that both the just and unjust should be ruled the same way. The founders were likely to take this lesson and create a government that ensures fairness to all, regardless of their social, political, or economic status.

This meant that everyone would be held to the same standards, and the government would ensure that there were no special privileges given to any group or individual.

Additionally, Augustine believed that those who govern should be accountable to the people they govern. This idea is crucial in a democracy, and it is likely that the founders would have taken this lesson and created a system of government that is accountable to the citizens.

The government would be answerable to the people and would be obliged to work in the best interests of all citizens.

Lastly, Augustine believed in the rule of law and that the law should be applied equally to all. This idea is also central to a democracy, and it is likely that the founders would have taken this lesson and created a government that upholds the rule of law. In such a government, everyone would be subject to the same laws, and there would be no room for arbitrary or unjust actions by those in power.

To learn more about democracy

https://brainly.com/question/30078994

#SPJ11

The complete question is-

What lessons were the founders likely to take from St. Augustine's perspective on ruling the just and unjust alike when designing a civil government?

Aldrich Plan was a precursor to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and it was created by a National Monetary Commission. The Aldrich Plan's significance includes the following options A, B, C, D.

It laid the technical foundations for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.It helped reform the national monetary commission and established the national reserve association. It helped establish the national monetary commission and solved the financial problem. It provided a solution to the panic of 1907. Thus, the correct options are A, B, C, D.

The Aldrich Plan refers to a monetary proposal put forth in the early 20th century by Nelson W. Aldrich, a Republican senator from Rhode Island. The plan aimed to address the issues of banking and currency regulation in the United States.

To learn more about Federal Reserve Act, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1302974

#SPJ11

Post-war American labor strikes had a great impact on American society. These strikes focused attention on the exploitation of workers and poor working conditions, leading to improved labor standards. The strike also raised public awareness and support for workers' rights, paving the way for the development of labor laws and regulations.

The increased power and organization of trade unions has increased the bargaining power of workers and contributed to improved wages, benefits and workplace protection. However, strikes have created tensions between workers and employers, sometimes leading to violent clashes.

Nevertheless, taken as a whole, the post-war labor strikes represented an important step toward fairer treatment and rights for American workers. 

To learn more about Post War Strikes:

https://brainly.com/question/10408661

#SPJ4

Answer:

The two statements that best show how the Scientific Revolution changed the way people perceived nature and society are:

1. People started applying the principles of the scientific method, empiricism, and experimentation to other aspects of life.

2. People started challenging the accepted "scientific truths" taught by the church, which weakened its authority.

The Scientific Revolution brought about a major shift in the way people thought about the natural world and society. It challenged traditional beliefs and encouraged people to question accepted truths. With the rise of empiricism and the scientific method, people began to apply these principles to other areas of life, leading to advances in fields such as medicine, engineering, and agriculture. At the same time, the Scientific Revolution also led to a questioning of the authority of the church and the traditional view of the world it espoused. This helped pave the way for the Enlightenment and the development of modern science and philosophy.

The two statements that best show how the Scientific Revolution changed the way people perceived nature and society are:

Thus, options A and D are the correct options.

During the Scientific Revolution, the use of scientific methods and experimentation expanded beyond the natural sciences and began to influence various other aspects of life, including medicine, technology, and philosophy.

Additionally, as scientific discoveries challenged the traditional teachings of the church, they led to a shift in authority and a growing reliance on empirical evidence and reason to understand nature and society, gradually separating science and religion.

Thus, options A and D are the correct options.

Learn more about Scientific Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/21289245

#SPJ5

To rebuild war-torn Europe, prevent communism's spread, and establish stable markets for American goods.

The United States had several key interests in investing billions of dollars in the Marshall Plan. Firstly, after World War II, Europe was devastated, with economies in ruins and social structures disrupted. By providing financial aid and resources, the U.S. aimed to rebuild Europe's infrastructure and stabilize its economies.

This not only fostered goodwill and gratitude towards the U.S. but also prevented the rise of communism, which could have taken hold in the chaotic post-war environment. Additionally, the plan aimed to create stable markets for American goods, ensuring access to European consumers and facilitating economic growth for American businesses. Ultimately, the Marshall Plan served both humanitarian and strategic purposes for the United States.

To learn more about American Follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/8678061

#SPJ4

Petersburg, Virginia was a strategic city during the American Civil War, and its significance was due to several factors that made it essential to the Confederate capital.

The city was located just 23 miles south of Richmond, the Confederate capital, and thus was an important link in the supply chain for the city. It was also an important transportation hub, as several rail lines converged in the city. Additionally, Petersburg was home to several manufacturing and supply facilities, including an important armory that produced weapons and ammunition for the Confederate army.

The city's location on the Appomattox River made it a natural transportation hub, as boats could carry goods up and down the river to Richmond and other locations. Finally, the city was heavily fortified, with a ring of earthen fortifications that protected it from attack by Union forces.

The Confederate leadership understood the importance of Petersburg to their war effort and thus devoted significant resources to defend the city. The siege of Petersburg lasted from June 1864 until April 1865, and was one of the longest and bloodiest of the Civil War.

In the end, the fall of Petersburg in April 1865 was a significant factor in the ultimate collapse of the Confederacy, as it cut off the supply line to Richmond and allowed Union forces to capture the capital city.

For more such questions on American Civil War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ8

Joseph Brant was an important leader who played a significant role in the politics, culture, and military of the Native American people.

Joseph Brant, also known as Thayendanegea, was a Mohawk leader who played a significant role in shaping the politics and culture of the indigenous peoples of North America. His impact was not limited to his own people, but also affected the interactions between Europeans and Native Americans. He was one of the most important leaders in the Indian tribes who fought with the British against the colonists in the American Revolution.

The significance of Joseph Brant:

1. Political Significance:

Joseph Brant played a significant role in the politics of the Native American people. He was an effective negotiator, and his leadership helped to forge alliances between different Native American tribes. He was instrumental in the establishment of the Indian Confederacy, a political union between several Native American nations. The Confederacy was formed to protect their lands, resources, and sovereignty from encroachment by European powers.

2. Cultural Significance:

Joseph Brant played an important role in preserving the culture and traditions of the Mohawk people. He was a fluent speaker of several Native American languages and worked to preserve their oral traditions. He also helped to establish schools for Native American children, where they could learn their own language and culture. He wrote a Mohawk-English dictionary and translated Christian religious texts into Mohawk, which helped to preserve their language and cultural traditions.

3. Military Significance:

Joseph Brant was a skilled military leader who led the Mohawk warriors in battle against the American colonists during the American Revolution. He was instrumental in many of the British victories during the war. Brant's leadership skills and military tactics were highly regarded by the British, and he became a symbol of resistance against the American forces.

Joseph Brant was an important leader who played a significant role in the politics, culture, and military of the Native American people. His leadership and negotiating skills helped to forge alliances between different Native American tribes, and his military tactics were highly regarded by the British. He also worked to preserve the culture and traditions of the Mohawk people, and his contributions helped to maintain the identity of his people.

To learn more about alliances visit:

brainly.com/question/17245460

#SPJ11

Answer:

The major differences between the Declaration of Independence and I Have a Dream speech are:

Purpose:

The Declaration of Independence explained the justifications and necessities for America's political separation from Britain and declared the colonies independent states. The I Have a Dream speech called for an end to racial inequality and the realization of true equality and justice for African Americans in the United States.

Audience:

The Declaration of Independence was addressed to King George III of Britain and the British Parliament, formally announcing the colonies' break from the British Empire. The I Have a Dream speech was directed at the larger American public, especially African Americans, appealing to the nation's conscience and sense of justice.

Means of Change:

The Declaration advocated and legitimized violent revolution and political separation as the means to bring about change. The I Have a Dream speech called for nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to challenge the status quo and achieve social and economic justice.

Authorship:

The Declaration of Independence was primarily written by Thomas Jefferson. The I Have a Dream speech was delivered by Martin Luther King Jr. though it incorporated themes and phrases from King's earlier writings and speeches.

In summary, while both texts are iconic examples of demanding justice and equality, their purposes, audiences, means of change and authors significantly differ. The Declaration of Independence focuses on political independence while the I Have a Dream speech emphasizes social and economic justice.

African Americans wanted their own land for several reasons. First, they sought economic independence and self-sufficiency. Owning land would allow them to cultivate crops, raise livestock, and engage in other forms of agriculture, which would provide a source of income and food security.

Second, having their own land would enable African Americans to establish their own communities and build institutions that catered to their specific needs. This was particularly important in the context of segregation and discrimination, as it allowed them to create spaces where they could live free from racial hostility and pursue their own cultural and social aspirations. Finally, owning land also represented a form of political empowerment.

By having control over their own resources and being able to participate in decision-making processes within their communities, African Americans could assert their agency and challenge the systemic inequalities they faced. Overall, owning land was seen as a means to attain economic, social, and political autonomy for African Americans.

To know more about Americans visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8678061

#SPJ11

Answer:

The group opposed to proslavery legislation in Kansas that drew up its own state constitution was called the Free-Staters.

After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, the territory of Kansas became a battleground over whether it would enter the Union as a free state or slave state. Many Northerners who opposed the expansion of slavery into the western territories migrated to Kansas to ensure it became a free state. They became known as Free-Staters.

The Free-Staters drew up and adopted their own anti-slavery state constitution in Topeka in 1855. They elected their own state government under the Topeka Constitution. However, the proslavery federal government did not recognize this government or constitution.

Clashes and conflict eventually broke out between Free-Staters and proslavery "Border Ruffian" settlers from Missouri, resulting in violent unrest known as "Bleeding Kansas."

It took years of struggle and contention, but Kansas eventually entered the Union in 1861 as a free state under a new constitution that did not allow slavery. This was a major victory for the Free-State cause.

So the group opposed to proslavery laws in Kansas who adopted their own antislavery constitution were the Free-Staters. Their constitution, the Topeka Constitution of 1855, became the foundation for Kansas' later formal admission as a free state.

The Free-Staters opposed the proslavery legislature in Kansas and drafted the Topeka Constitution, which aimed to prohibit slavery. This was a key event in the Civil War era conflict known as Bleeding Kansas.

The group that opposed the proslavery legislature in Kansas and drew up its own state constitution was known as the Free-Staters. This group was composed of settlers who were against the expansion of slavery. They took action by forming their own government and drafting a constitution that would have prohibited slavery, commonly referred to as the Topeka Constitution. This was part of the events leading to the violent period known as Bleeding Kansas, which was a series of violent confrontations in Kansas and along the border with Missouri.

https://brainly.com/question/31832974

#SPJ2

Washington implemented policies such as the Northwest Ordinance and military expeditions to secure and expand American control over the West.

George Washington took various actions to secure the West and expand American influence in the region. One significant measure was the passage and implementation of the Northwest Ordinance in 1787. This legislation established a system for organizing territories and outlined a process for their admission as states, ensuring orderly settlement and governance in the Northwest Territory.

Additionally, Washington authorized military expeditions, such as the campaign against the Native American confederacy led by Little Turtle and Blue Jacket, to address threats to American expansion in the West. By asserting American military presence and implementing policies for territorial governance, Washington aimed to secure the region and pave the way for future westward expansion, contributing to the growth and consolidation of the United States.

To learn more about American follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/8678061

#SPJ4

Much like the printing press did in Europe, the internet and digital technologies have recently had a dramatic impact on how ideas are shared. The internet has transformed communication by enabling the quick transfer of ideas, information, and expertise around the world. It has

democratized information access by enabling people to share their ideas and opinions on a variety of digital platforms, including websites, blogs, social media, and online magazines. The internet has enabled an unprecedented worldwide flow of knowledge and ideas, much like the

printing press did during the Renaissance and Reformation, which increased literacy and aided the dissemination of ideas. By lowering the entry barriers for content creation, it has made it easier for people and groups to express their opinions and participate in cross-cultural dialogue.

to know more about printing press refer to the link below

https://brainly.com/question/22177437

#SPJ4

The Harlem Renaissance influenced American culture today through literature, arts, empowerment, and the fight for equality and representation.

The Harlem Renaissance continues to exert a profound influence on American culture today in several ways. Firstly, it left an indelible mark on literature and the arts, with the works of notable figures such as Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston inspiring subsequent generations of writers, poets, and artists. Their themes of racial pride, identity, and social justice remain relevant and resonate with contemporary audiences.

Additionally, the Harlem Renaissance fostered a sense of community and empowerment, leading to the establishment of cultural institutions, such as the Apollo Theater, which remain iconic today. The movement's emphasis on African American heritage and creativity also helped pave the way for the Civil Rights Movement, influencing the ongoing fight for equality and representation. Overall, the Harlem Renaissance's enduring legacy continues to shape and enrich American cultural landscapes.

To learn more about empowerment follow the link

https://brainly.com/question/31813118

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Name some ways the Harlem Renaissance still influences American culture today.

The Vietnam War was the first broadcast conflict, bringing the horrors of the battle right into American homes. The shocking pictures and media coverage demolished the idea that America is invincible and revealed the cruelty of war.

A significant anti-war movement and activism emerged across the nation as a result of the Vietnam War. As Americans expressed their opposition to the war, protests, marches, and acts of civil disobedience increased in frequency. American culture and artistic expression were impacted by the Vietnam War. It sparked a surge of anti-establishment songs, including well-known pieces by Bob Dylan and Creedence Clearwater Revival.

Learn more about the Vietnam War here:

https://brainly.com/question/31746600

#SPJ4

Your Complete question was as follows:

Sequence the ways in which Vietnam changed America.

Shifting Public Opinion, The Vietnam War was the first broadcast conflict, bringing the horrors of the battle right into American homes.

Answer:

Samuel de Champlain founded a fur trading post in Quebec.

Answer:

Other countries are willing to increase aid because the public funds have been diverted.