The pop-up advertisements that claim you've won are frequently only a cover for viruses and con artists.
What are advertisements?Advertising sometimes referred to as an advert or ad, is typically seen as a form of public discourse that supports a good, service, organization, or event. Some others consider the concept to be far broader than that, including any sort of sponsored advertisement intended to inform or influence
On occasion, pop-up advertisements congratulating you on winning a reward may have interrupted your smartphone browsing on other websites. Navigate to Settings while in Safe mode, then swipe to and tap Apps. From here, you can uninstall the most recent app(s) that have been installed or updated and may be the source of the pop-up ads.
Therefore, advertisements that claim you've won are frequently
Learn more about advertisements here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
18. ellen was injured when she was struck by a car driven by matthew. at the time, ellen was crossing the street and matthew entered the intersection and not paying attention to the crosswalk while he was on the telephone, but the light was still yellow. ellen sustained substantial injuries and sued matthew for negligence. at trial, matthew testified that ellen caused the accident because ellen was crossing the street while the light was still yellow in matthew's favor. which of the following is matthew's best defense? a. superseding negligence of ellen. b. strict liability against jennifer. c. contributory negligence of ellen. d. none of the above.
Answer: c. contributory negligence of Ellen.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was intended to meet which major objective?
In reaction to many accounting scandals in the early 2000s, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), a federal law, was enacted in 2002 with backing from both political parties in Congress. Its goals were to enhance auditing and public transparency.
What is Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)?Generally, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a federal law that was passed in 2002 with support from both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in Congress.
In conclusion, Its purpose was to strengthen auditing practices and increase the amount of information that was made available to the public in response to a number of accounting scandals that occurred in the early 2000s.
Read more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
https://brainly.com/question/28484220
#SPJ1
Miranda v. arizona if we are all charged with knowing the law, how could the court find that miranda needed to be informed of his rights by the state? could miranda be tried again for the same crime? what justification would the court have in imposing such a burden on the police? would they not be practicing law by giving such legal advice? was excluding the evidence (the confession) the only sanction available to the u.s. supreme court? can you think of some other sanctions that would still allow such evidence to be used but protect the innocent person who might be subjected to such treatment.
Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.
In this case it was established that the Police need to make you aware about your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.
It has provided detainees with the right to not to self incriminate along with the right to humanise their life.In the case of Miranda, he was tried and convicted again, without using the confession against him.In the final Outcome his conviction was overturned.This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.
To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13483624
#SPJ4
difference did mccabe and fajardo find between accredited and non-accredited law enforcement agencies
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
what similarities and differences do you find among grotius, wilson, and posner? which argument do you find most compelling and why? what are the strengths and weaknesses of international law and organizations? are they effective at promoting peace and cooperation?
Hugo grotius : Known as the father of international law. He developed the rules governing the conduct of war
Posner : According to Posner, states will not reliably comply with customary international law.
Wilson : He sought to take international law out of the hands of states and give it to the true sovereign.
Strengths of international law are
They promote unity and strength.Settle various disputesDiscuss important world ordersMaintain a global system including trade, commerce and governance.Weakness of international law are
Lacks effective law machinery
The International Court of Justice has no authority.Weak sanction and efficiency.They help in promoting peace and stability but due to certain issues it gets into backend. With proper control it can definitely be improved.
To know more about International law from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1449228
#SPJ4
What ethical considerations do human resource teams need to take into account
when developing harassment or affirmation action policies?
Being a company's moral compass, Human Resource teams who uphold high moral standards and try to create a fair workplace will keep employees' confidence and draw in new applicants.
Here are six HR ethics rules that businesses may adhere to in order to master the art of moral decision-making and establish themselves as a valued resource for their staff.
1) Maintain information privacy: HR professionals have access to a variety of sensitive data about employees, including social security numbers and medical records. You may relax knowing that the information about your firm is safe by making sure that paper documents and computer systems are secure.
2) Put diversity and inclusion policies into practice Nowadays, discussions regarding diversity frequently centre on efforts to recruit people of all races, classes, and genders.
3) Recognize potential conflict of interest
4) Act as an ethical HR leader: This entails having faith in your moral judgments and convincingly articulating them to staff members.
5)Prioritize your professional growth: HR is a topic that is continuously evolving, particularly as new discussions emerge and technology continues to transform how we work.
6) Be aware of the law: HR professionals must take decisive action as an organization's representative and hold violators of the law accountable.
What is a good HRM ethics example?
For instance, there are some rights that cannot be compromised, such as the right to privacy and the right to appropriate recompense for the labor performed.
Therefore maintaining ethics is very much important by human resource teams.
To learn more about human resource teams from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13135400
#SPJ1
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada, the first in 1980 and the 2nd was in 1995. Discuss the differences between the two referendums.
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada
The failure of the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord left big uncertainty approximately the constitutional future of Canada.
The primary signal was a dramatic exchange within the political landscape of the residence of Commons following the 1993 election. The innovative Conservative birthday party, related to former top Minister Brian Mulroney and the failed accords, changed into clearly wiped out.
Even as the federalist Liberals below Jean Chrétien received a majority, the competition was fractured along regional lines, between the western-based Reform birthday celebration of Canada and the avowedly separatist Bloc Québécois, which shaped the legitimate competition.
Learn more about sovereignty https://brainly.com/question/7793449
#SPJ1
What is the major weakness of the literal approach to statutory
interpretation?
The major weakness of the literal approach to statutory interpretation is that It might produce outcomes that look unfair and go against the wishes of Parliament.
What is meant by the statutory interpretation?Statutory construction, also known as statutory interpretation, is the process through which courts apply and interpret the law.
Using the legal principle of statutory interpretation, a judge tries to comprehend and apply the law to a specific situation. Judges apply this approach because it's possible that municipal, state, and federal laws don't cover particular circumstances that arise after they're written. Additionally, judges use statutory interpretation to determine the applicability of little-used or outdated legislation in current cases.
Read more on statutory law here: https://brainly.com/question/864793
#SPJ1
Discuss the following question (300 word minimum)...
This Ted Talk was given 4 years ago. We are currently seeing the issues that can arise from countries threatening nuclear war (Russia's invasion of Ukraine). Don't forget, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and Ukraine became the world's third largest possessor of nuclear weapons from the fall of the Soviet Union. As a result, Ukraine agreed to become a Non Nuclear Weapon State giving up all of their 1,900+ nuclear weapons.
Why is important for the U.S. to monitor WMDs throughout the world? The U.S. has WMDs; so, should we have the authority to tell other countries that they can't have them? Do you think Russia would have invaded Ukraine if they had not agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal almost 28 years ago?
In the past, countries that have various proliferation capabilities have done so primarily to stave off challenges to regional security and secondarily to discourage American engagement.
A nation's decision to develop WMD is exclusively dependent on the threat that other nations pose to that nation. No other nation may meddle in it. However, the creation of WMD is resisted in order to preserve international harmony and prevent further conflicts.
What are WMDs?A chemical, radiological, biological, nuclear, or other weapon that have the potential to kill many people, seriously injure them or significantly disrupt both man-made and natural structures, as well as the biosphere, is considered a weapon of mass destruction.
China, France, India, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are the eight countries.
Most are in Russia's arsenal, followed by those of the United States.
Learn more about WMDs, from:
brainly.com/question/14586437
#SPJ1
before the weeks v united states which of the following was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence
Evidence excluded at trial was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence. The exclusionary rule bars the government from using the majority of evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.
Weeks is subject to the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, and the evidence seized as a result must be excluded from his prosecution. The Court ruled unanimously that the seizure of items from Weeks' home directly violated his constitutional rights.
Here is the complete question-
Before the Weeks v. United States, which of the following was not a consequence for police when the unconstitutionally seized evidence?
a. Civil suits for the return of property.
b. Civil suits for damages.
c. Internal administrative discipline.
d. Evidence excluded at trial.
Learn more on evidence -
https://brainly.com/question/9306796
#SPJ4
Mandy volunteered in a month-long sleep study at the university last year. She was asked to participate because of her unusual sleep habits and neurological history. Part of the sleep study included her sleeping in a room inside the lab for the entire month. She was videotaped while she slept. Now, 13 months later, police are trying to charge Mandy with possession and use of illegal drugs. It turns out she was using drugs during her stay at the sleep lab. Her drug use was recorded in the lab videos. She's not sure how or why the police saw the videos. She knew she was being videotaped, although she was told it was only for the study and that no one outside the lab would view the footage.
Would the video evidence be helpful in proving the case? (Answer in one to two sentences. Explain your reasoning.)
No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.
She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.
What is neurology?The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.
The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.
Learn more about neurology, from:
brainly.com/question/7165863
#SPJ1
Can you remember the four (4) traditional rules of statutory interpretation?
Answer:
There are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are (1) the literal rule, (2) the golden rule, (3) the mischief rule and (4) the purposive approach.
Studies have found that gang member drug selling increases after leaving the gang.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because the gang still are going to need to get money
Logic models are used to
A logic model is essentially a methodical and visual means to convey and communicate your knowledge of the connections between the tools you have at your disposal to run your program, the actions you want to take, and the modifications or outcomes you wish to accomplish.
What are Logic models?Generally, Logic models are explanations of the chain of causes and effects that are thought to lead to a certain conclusion that is of interest.
In conclusion, Although they may be presented in a narrative format, logic models more often than not take the form of graphical depictions of the "if-then" linkages that exist between the many components that lead to the end.
Read more about Logic models
https://brainly.com/question/17372961
#SPJ1
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is an electronic surveillance system?A criminal's whereabouts may always be verified thanks to the EMS technique and tool. Using this technology, local government authorities can place a range of restrictions on a criminal. In recent years, defendants have been managed by EMS before trials.
It should be taken into consideration that the surveillance method known as "electronic tagging" uses an electronic gadget that is attached to a person. Several nations use an electronic tag that is fastened to the person's ankle as part of their bond or probation conditions. It is used in the fields of immigration and healthcare as well.
Learn more about electronic monitoring device from
https://brainly.com/question/6605512
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
in this and the next four problems, assume the litigation occurs in federal district court. ann, a citizen of illinois, sues barbara, also a citizen of illinois, alleging that barbara violated federal civil rights statutes in firing her. ann seeks to add a state law claim alleging that her firing also violated a state wrongful discharge law. is there supplemental jurisdiction?
Yes, it is the supplemental jurisdiction, also known as pendent jurisdiction, one of the authorities of the United States federal court.
The ability of United States federal courts to hear additional claims that are substantially related to the original claim even though the court lacks the subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the additional claims independently is known as supplemental jurisdiction, also referred to as ancillary jurisdiction or pendent jurisdiction. Pendent jurisdiction, as defined by the Supreme Court as "jurisdiction over non federal claims between parties litigating other matters lawfully before the court," is the right of a United States federal court to hear a closely connected state law claim against a party currently facing a federal claim.
For similar questions visit here :
https://brainly.com/question/14368682
#SPJ4
ASSIGNMENT
Frank lives and works in a city. He owns numerous tracts of land in a county outside the city where he hunts and fishes. Mike, who has never met Frank, starts living in a cabin in a remote section of Frank's land. At first Mike just stayed on the week-ends, but for the last 22 years he has made the cabin his home and made improvements to it. Mike now claims the cabin and surrounding area he possesses is his property.
Explain what factors represent each element of adverse possession. Will Mike get title to the land?
The 22 years, without interruption, that Mike used Frank's land and the fact that Frank did not claim or oppose it establish the elements of possession and time of adverse possession. The fact that Mike gave a function to the used land represents the element called the skillful thing of adverse possession.
Milke will obtain title to the land.
How to explain the elements of adverse possession?Skillful thing: Mik gave a social function to a land that had potential but was not being used.Time: Make spent a lot of time without an interruption in this land.Ownership: Frank, as the owner of the land, has not claimed ownership in 22 years.Adverse possession is a legal way of acquiring the property rights of a private asset that has been without social function for a long time.
In this case, to establish adverse possession on a piece of land, someone must invade some privately owned land, build a residence and live there for many years uninterrupted.
Furthermore, the legal owner of these lands must not claim them during these years, allowing another individual to continue using them for a long time.
Adverse possession is a way to avoid the accumulation of properties, mainly those that have no function and are not used by their owners.
Although adverse possession is a legal system, it does not apply to public goods, as the law considers that these goods belong to the entire community and are used by it in different ways.
Learn more about public goods:
https://brainly.com/question/14664702
#SPJ1
in the contemporary (bge) mirror setting, the sideview mirror is set to see the lane next to your vehicle.
The sideview mirror in the conventional (bge) mirror setting is designed to observe the area next to your vehicles. It is correct.
A convention, in the meaning of a meeting, is a group of individuals who assemble at a predetermined location and time to talk or engage in some mutual interest. The most prevalent conventions are based on industry, career, and fandom. Trade conventions often focus on a certain sector or industry segment and include keynotes, vendor displays, and other knowledge and activities of interest to event organisers and attendees. Professional conferences focus on issues of interest as well as advancements in the profession. Such gatherings are typically conducted by societies or community dedicated to the advancement of the topic of interest.
Learn more about vehicles here
https://brainly.com/question/27981487
#SPJ4
Evaluate the legal nature of the Letters of Credit and Performance Guarantee and identify the statute laws that govern it.
The major reason for describing the constitutional validity of the Letters of Credit and Performer Guaranteed and identifying the statute laws which govern are to solve issues and operations.
What is laws?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national.
The structure are the description are the solve in the activities, and it was in the issuance are the letter of credit and performances, according to the laws that are in the legal constitutional provisions.
Hence, the significance of the laws aforementioned.
Learn more about on laws, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
at the defendant's trial for stealing an automobile, the defendant called a character witness who testified that the defendant had an excellent reputation for honesty. in rebuttal, the prosecutor calls another witness to testify that he recently saw the defendant cheat on a college examination. the prosecution witness's testimony should be
The prosecution witness's testimony should be:
The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
What do you mean by cross examination?
The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination. It gives the opposing party a chance to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.
The main aim of cross examination is to strengthen an individual's case. The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility
Rules of Cross-Examination
Asking Questions Only.Inclusion of New Fact Per Question.Break questions into a Series of Logical ProgressionsHence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
To know more about Cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28114975
#SPJ4
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should: Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
What is a blind spot?A blind spot can be defined as an area or portion to either side of a vehicle, as well as the back (rear end) of a vehicle that is typically outside the field of vision of a driver, especially because it is not visible in the rear view mirror.
As a good driver, the most appropriate and acceptable ways to check the area on the right side of your vehicle is by turning your chin to your shoulder and then glance towards the blind spot through the right side rear window.
In conclusion, it is very wrong, inappropriate and unacceptable to glance towards the blind spot through your side window.
Read more on good blind spot here: https://brainly.com/question/17120761
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
Look in the interior rear-view mirror.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out the driver's side window.
Look in the exterior right side rear-view mirror.
it is easier to incriminate a young person for infringing on copyright rules under the dmca than to incriminate an older person.
Not always has the Digital Millennium Copyright Act been applied as intended. The DMCA has NOT been abused in this manner. Younger people are simpler to incriminate for violating copyright laws under the DMCA than older people are.
People have faced several threats since the internet's invention. Infringing on copyright is one of them. With only one click, anyone can browse millions of websites and post something on social media networks by editing someone else's original work—submitting research papers is a common example of this type of editing.
The infringement of someone's intellectual property is known as copyright (IP). It is another word for piracy or the theft of someone else's original work, particularly when the perpetrator reaps the rewards rather than the original author.
To know more about copyright click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/14704862
#SPJ4
Assume that an individual resides in Arlington County, meets the DSM criteria for a substance use disorder, and has agreed to plea guilty to their alleged crime (in addition to a 12-month suspended sentence). Given these facts, which of the following statements about that same individual participating in Arlington County's Drug Court is the MOST true?
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses.
They could participate in drug court is they also had no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
It is impossible to answer this question with the information provided.
Option 3. This individual would be able to participate in the drug court based on this option: They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
What is meant by drug court?Drug courts are specialized court docket initiatives that focus on criminal defendants and offenders, young offenders, and parents involved in ongoing child welfare proceedings who have issues with alcohol and other drugs.
Drug courts may differ in their intended audience, program structure, and service resources, but they often follow a well-rounded model that includes:
Risk, need, and responsiveness screening for offenders.judicial dialogue.Monitoring and supervision, such as drug testing.graduated penalties and rewards.services for treatment and rehabilitation.A non-adversarial, multidisciplinary team that includes judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, community prisons, social workers, and treatment service specialists typically runs drug courts. Through participation in hearings, programming, and celebrations like graduation, stakeholders representing law enforcement, the family, and the community are invited to offer their support.
Read more on drug courts here: https://brainly.com/question/14673992
#SPJ1
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.References:Collins, J. C.,
Because the student properly cited (in--text) the source of the quote relating to research, and also included the full details of the author in the bibliography, the issue of plagiarism, therefore, is nullified.
What is plagiarism?The act of copying another person's work without acknowledging them, citing them properly or including their names in the bibliography of the work is called plagiarism.
One of the ways to correct the above or avoid it altogether is to ensure that one's work is as original as possible. All citations must be noted that properly acknowledged according to the source form from which it came.
Learn more about plagiarism:
https://brainly.com/question/24405302
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Original Source Material
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Student Source Material
Research conducted by Collins and Porras (2002) highlights the importance of establishing and committing to an ideology comprised of two parts: (1) core values; (2) a core purpose. In my personal experience it seems easier to define a core ideology than to live it consistently.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarismParaphrasing plagiarismThis is not plagiarismHints: Item 2
7. Economists may disagree because they have
different
pre
TEMPER
a. hunches about the validity of alternative
theories.
Prestan
Milita
Quick Qu
b. judgments about the size of key parameters.
c. political philosophies about the goals of public
policy.
d. All of the above.
Economists may disagree because they have different all of the above. The correct option is D.
What do economists disagree about?There is widespread disagreement among economists about the appropriate size of government, the power of trade unions, the negative effects of unemployment and inflation, equitable income distribution, and whether or not a tax-cut policy is desirable. On these issues, economists are divided.
Economists may reach different scientific conclusions. To put it another way, economists may disagree on the validity of option positive theories about how the world really works.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about economists here:
https://brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
To what extent do you think the criminal justice system response to the pandemic has had an impact on the provision of public safety? Here you must look at the crime rates during the pandemic and measures introduced during the pandemic such as curfews and the ban of alcohol.
Globally speaking, COVID-19 has significantly changed criminal justice systems. It has affected crime trends, the ability of the police to catch specific crimes like child abuse, and how the justice system handles the pandemic's effects.
Major policy and practise changes have been started at an unprecedented rate by some leaders in the justice system. Technologies have been used to enable remote working, new working practises have been implemented, and protocols have been modified to give high risk offences priority.
Leaders are optimistic about the advantages of the changes, but there are some worries as well. As an illustration, there is a delay in some areas, such as the courts and probation services, and it is still unclear how COVID-19 will affect the justice system in the long run.
To know more about COVID-19:
brainly.com/question/28908700
#SPJ1
the ruling in miller v. california is a landmark decision by the u.s. supreme court in which the court redefined its definition of what constitutes obscenity. this definition has been translated into what is referred to as the miller test, a test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case the material is not protected by the first amendment and therefore becomes illegal. the miller test was developed in 1973 and has three parts, what are they?
The Miller test is the standard test which explains what constitues expression of obscenity.
Explain more about the Miller Test?
It was given by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (1973).It majorly dealt with many online and real time obscene cases. It is a standard test that is still used to determine many cases
The three parts which it include are:
appeals to the prurient interest of the people describes sexual conduct in a offensive way (patent offensiveness)lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.This is how Miller test is used and broken into many parts.
To know more about Miller test from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/14139451
#SPJ4
a court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except a) the written agreement does not contain the whole agreement. e) the missing term is a condition precedent to the written agreement. c) the missing term is part of a subsequent oral agreement. d) the missing term is part of a collateral agreement. b) the written agreement is unambiguous.
A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
What do you mean by parol?
Parol can be defined as a release of a prisoner on some conditions who has served part of a sentence as well as is under legal custody. It is generally given because of good behaviour. It helps them in reintegrating into society and humanising their life. It is the provisional or temporary release of a prisoner who has to agree to certain Norms like deposit , security before release. The parole rules as described in the Prisons Act, 2000 which are part of both legal and prisons law.
Hence, A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
To know about Parol from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
peer pressure __in why some teens get in a car with an impaired driver?
Answer: Some kids are a bad influence
Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.
In your own words, describe why it’s critical to always have auto insurance. Provide at least two examples of situations where you might need insurance.
Auto Insurance is always necessary for auto driver as well as his passengers.
Life Insurance, car Insurance, health insurance etc. are needed insurance for everyone .
Auto insurance is very important for drivers and it is madintory for everyone in every states. benefits of auto insurance are
Auto insurance helps passengers :health and personal injury insurance can help pay for medical expenses if you are injured in an accident. It also helps in recovering passenger costs due to accidents. This coverage helps pay for hospital visits, medical expenses, and surgery.
Auto insurance helps protect yourself.Liability insurance is required by law, but many people drive without it. Uninsured Motorist Insurance helps pay for medical bills if you are run over by an uninsured driver. This coverage is mandatory in some states and optional in others.
Adequate auto insurance coverage does more than meet legal requirements. Auto insurance helps protect your car, wallet and even equipment.
personally everyone needed some basic insurance policies which are following:
Life insuranceCar insurancehealth insuranceTo learn more about insurance , refer :
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
