Answers
MeToo is a social movement against s-exual abuse, s-exual harassment, and r-ape culture, in which people publicize their experiences of s-exual abuse or s-exual harassment.
The cases that emerged from Metoo movement:
1. 2006 Tarana B Case
Tarana B, a social activist and community organizer, began using phrase "MeToo" in 2006, on My-space to promote “empowerment through empathy” among women of color who have been s-exually abused. She was raped and s-exually assaulted. Through this movement she came out in public to seek justice for women like her.
2. 2015 Ambra G Case
Italian model Ambra reported a case and accused Weinstein of touching her inappropriately, he was arrested but later released by court due to lack of evidence.
Apart from these two cases, there were a lot of cases filed across the globe not just in US. Few other popular cases like 2017 Alyssa case and Johny-Amber case also fall under cases which resulted from Metoo movement.
Issue of Consent and Criminal Liability
The feminist slogan “no means no” became widely accepted and written into law. Youngsters came of age seeing themselves as more egalitarian in relationships and appreciative of how communication enhances intimacy. One expression of such expression has been development of the idea of affirmative consent. Affirmative consent is a knowing, voluntary and mutual decision among all participants to engage in intimacy.
Consent has been one of then factors in deciding Criminal liability in Metoo cases and therefore the movement also aims at changing the definition of consent itself.
Do r-ape shield laws work?
A question was posed on r-ape shield laws by the protestors when offenders were acquitted in several Metoo cases due to lack of evidence against them. However, a r-ape shield law limits the introduction of evidence by a defendant charged with r-ape. The evidence not allowed in concerns the victim's past s-exual conduct. Evidence against them is always allowed and it depends on work of investigative agencies to gather evidence against offenders.
Examples of some r-ape shield law include Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which is a federal law and among states Arizona's Criminal Code includes a statute entitled, “Evidence Relating to Victim's Chastity.”
To know more about Metoo:
brainly.com/question/28708683
#SPJ1
Related Questions
in a two (2) paragraphs write what you understand about the the territorial power and how can it help to impose security in a establishment.
Answers
Based on socio-political and security concepts, territorial power can help to impose security in an establishment by assisting the establishment to function and move legitimate goods in relative freedom within the country and across its borders.
What is Territorial Power?Territorial Power is a term that is used to describe the power which a government or establishment has over a particular area. This power helps the establishment govern and protect the place against internal and external influence.
Territorial power can help impose security in an establishment because they will be able to exercise the power to station security personnel and defend against any form of invasion or robbery.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the use of territorial power is essential for establishments to provide adequate security for themselves.
Learn more about Territorial power here: https://brainly.com/question/13664169
#SPJ1
5. Beth is driving her car down the street when Tom, who was behind a bush, tries to run across the street. Beth’s car strikes Tom. Beth knew that her car’s brakes were bad.
1. Beth is responsible for the accident.
2. Beth is not negligent.
3. Tom is the only negligent party to this happening.
4. None of the above.
Answers
Beth is responsible for the accident is the correct answer.
The which means of a twist of fate may be defined in several methods; however, the maximum primary definition is whilst a voluntary action results in harm or death.
The act that causes injury or death isn't generally deemed dangerous and is generally performed without severe consequences. accident: an occasion that affects in injury or ill fitness. incident: close to omit: an occasion no longer causing harm,
however, has the potential to motive damage or unwell fitness (in this steering, the term near pass over will include risky occurrences)the principle distinction between 'twist of fate' and 'incident' is the former does bring about private harm or assets damage. even as the latter would not result in private damage. while we call something a "twist of fate" it means that no one is at fault and that no one, such as the driving force, bears responsibility for the outcome. The time period "crash," alternatively, is more unique in phrases of the motion's outcome without the unpreventable implication.Learn more about accident here: https://brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
The prosecutor kept saying that he has to meet her burden of proof with might be difficult in this case what does that mean
Answers
The prosecution has the burden of proof in a criminal trial. The defendant must be proven guilty of the allegations against them by the prosecution to the jury without a shadow of a doubt.
What does prosecution mean?
The decision to pursue a case is made by the magistrate based on the police report that was provided, and the prosecutor is then chosen. The prosecutor is chosen to act as the state's or the government's representative in any criminal case.
Such actions are started by the prosecuting attorney, who could be the federal United States Attorney, the state Attorney General, or the district attorney in question.
Learn more about prosecution from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23179189
#SPJ1
roe v. wade and other major court cases often make their way through the court system ending with the court of final appeal, more commonly known as
Answers
There are three main levels to the federal court system: district courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the last level of appeal in the federal system, are the three levels of appeal.
What is the court's final decision?
the final court decision that settles all disputed issues and the parties' rights in relation to those issues. The only decisions left after a final judgment are how to enforce the judgment, whether to award costs, and whether to appeal.
What are the three ways that an appeal to the Supreme Court can be handled?
appeals through state and federal courts, appeals through the original jurisdiction.
Learn more about Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
the charging document for a felony crime is the indictment; in a misdemeanor criminal case, this charge is called the . a. complaint b. information c. affidavit d. subpoena
Answers
The indictment is the charging document for a felony offence; the complaint is the charging document in a misdemeanour criminal case. A pleading that brings criminal charges against a defendant is known as a charging document. It—not an arrest—marks the start of a criminal investigation.
A charging document is any declaration made by the Commission that an individual or group has broken one of the laws under its purview. A felony prosecution must start with an indictment in the federal system according to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
In Minnesota, a police officer may also issue a citation for a misdemeanour or petty misdemeanour. Many of them are also frequently referred to as "traffic tickets" or "traffic citations," Charge-making documents include complaints, informations, and indictments.
To know more about document click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/7444017
#SPJ4
Do you agree with the restrictions placed on “Freedom to Assembly”? Explain why/why not.
Answers
Freedom of Assembly permits citizens to raise issues, call for change, and get responses from public figures. Without the right to assemble, there are fewer avenues for citizens to access information between elections and chances for engagement in transparent government.
Can the right to assemble be restricted?
A public authority may occasionally impose restrictions on your freedom of assembly and association. This only applies in situations when the authorities can demonstrate that the action was justified in order to safeguard public safety or national security. avert chaos or criminality. Gatherings that pose other imminent hazards to public safety may also be stopped or prevented by authorities.
To know more about Freedom of Assembly click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/7954791
#SPJ1
HELP i think its B.
The U.S. Constitution makes it clear that laws must never be challenged.
A - True
B - False
Answers
Answer:
B-Fales
Explanation:
An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose.
Parliament alone is given the power to make changes to this framework under Article 368 [16]. Unlike ordinary laws, amendments to constitutional provisions require a special majority vote in Parliament.
Basically, it is harder to make changes in the law, but does not mention that laws must never be challenged.
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Answers
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of option C: electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is a system for electronic surveillance?An offender's whereabouts may always be confirmed thanks to the method and device known as EMS. Local government agencies are able to impose a variety of restrictions on a criminal using this technology. Recently, EMS has been utilized to manage defendants prior to trial.
Note that An electronic device attached to a person is used in the surveillance technique known as "electronic tagging." As part of their bond or probation requirements, several countries utilize an electronic tag that is attached to the person's ankle. In addition, it is applied in the domains of immigration and healthcare.
Learn more about electronic monitoring from
https://brainly.com/question/4523474
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
the burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contracting rests on the party trying to:
Answers
The burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contraction rests on the party trying to: "Avoid Payment."
What is Burden of Proof?
The duty to produce evidence relevant to the lawsuit or criminal accusation is known as the burden of proof.
The burden of proof in a civil action brought by one person against another belongs to that person. Each of the two parties involved would be asked to recount their own side of the story once the case received an official response and the trial process got underway. The plaintiff, the party who filed the lawsuit with the court, is responsible for proving that the allegations made in the lawsuit are true and that the other defendant is to blame for the harm or damages at issue.
To know more about Burden of Proof, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/22982480
#SPJ4
How does the U.S. government influence the market economy?
It tells companies how much to charge for all goods.
It provides public goods and services.
It prevents states from collecting taxes.
It buys companies in foreign markets.
69 points man
for the memes
Answers
Answer:
It provides public goods and supplies
Explanation:
Governments can create subsidies, taxing the public and giving the money to an industry, or tariffs, adding taxes to foreign products to lift prices and make domestic products more appealing. Higher taxes, fees, and greater regulations can stymie businesses or entire industries.
Johnny is a forensic scientist. He tests for gunshot residue. Which of the following tests might Johnny use?
test, which should turn the material red if gunshot residue is present. For another item, he only has a
which is known to return conclusive results even on very small amounts.
Johnny uses the
small amount of material to test, so he chooses
Answers
Johnny uses the small amount of material to test.
How can gunshot residue be found using a test?Identifying GSR has been done since the late 1970s using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For GSR analysis and identification in a laboratory setting, this method is the most trustworthy. The first step in this process is to use a swab that has been moistened with diluted nitric acid to swipe the suspect's hands, clothes, belt, or shoes.Other techniques, like atomic absorption, simply detect the quantity of bulk elements present and do not account for their form, making scanning electron microscopy the sole approach available to validate the presence of GSR particles.To learn more about GSR particles refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28282704
#SPJ1
_____ refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Answers
Caseload refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Why is managing the caseload crucial?It is primarily a tool for the client's immediate benefit as well as for professional development and supervision.
Note that the supervisee's type and amount of work is outlined by caseload management.
Therefore, based on the above, the term Caseload is one that is seen as the quantity of families or children assigned to a specific worker in a particular amount of time.
Learn more about Case from
https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ1
Your privacy is protected by all of the following except
O local government
O state government
O federal government
Answers
You are able, thanks to the Privacy Act: know the reasons for collecting your personal information, how it will be used, and who will receive it. have the option of using a pseudonym or not identifying yourself in certain situations. solicit access to your private information, including health data.
What rights are guaranteed by the Privacy Act?Records about individuals retrieved using personal identifiers like a name, social security number, or another identifying number or symbol are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended to the present and including Statutory Notes (5 U.S.C. 552a).
Is the Constitution right to privacy?Although the Constitution does not provide for the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has stated that a number of the amendments do so.
Learn more Privacy Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/1189272
#SPJ1
an alcohol license, once granted, becomes a right and cannot be taken away except in the event the proprietor sells the business.
Answers
Once obtained, an alcohol licence becomes a right that cannot be revoked unless the owner sells the business. This assertion is untrue. To work in a bar or other establishment that sells alcohol, you are not required to have a personal licence. A designated premises is required for locations with alcohol sales permits.
Many liquor licences outline the precise hours that alcohol may be offered within the business. The sale of alcohol after 2:00 a.m. is prohibited in many states. State-by-state and even city-by-city variations in laws and regulations are possible.
But every state has a number of methods through which a company, like a bar or restaurant, can lose its liquor licence. Selling alcohol to people under the legal drinking age is arguably the surest way for a business to lose its liquor licence.
To know more about licences click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/4410292
#SPJ4
unhappy with the decision passed by a lower court in a civil rights violation case, anastasia files her case with the united states supreme court, hoping that the court will take it up for review. in this case, the supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case. select one: a. writ of habeas corpus b. writ of mandamus c. writ of certiorari d. writ of mens rea
Answers
The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
What is writ of certiorari?
This is a request that the Supreme Court can order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. In this if atleast 4 judges hear the case it will be heard and discussed. It can be applied by any member of public.
Sometimes it is also called as judicial Writ. It can be granted when amounts to abuse of discretion or lack or excess of jurisdiction. It cab be granted in any civil, criminal or judicial cases.
Hence, The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about writ of certiorari from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ4
Examine the following situations decide whether the search violates the fourth amendment.explain your decisions.
d.Pam is seen shoplifting in a store.police chase Pam into her apartment building and arrest her outside the closed door of her apartment.A search of her apartment reveals a large quantity of stolen goods.
e. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house and ask Claire,her roommate,if they can search the house.Claire gives them permission,and they find stolen in Sandis dresser
Answers
Pam is seen shoplifting in a store and Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods this suggests that there is a violation in the fourth amendment with respect to the case of Sandi.
What is the fourth amendment?The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the U.s. Constitutional. It outlaws arbitrary warrantless searches.
In this situation where families have been seen shifting or is being seen to be taking the goods from a store. This music that she is a criminal police had the right to search her apartment but if a person is suspected without having any kind of proof which is the case of Sandi and still her house is being investigated without her permission then it is a violation of the 4th amendment right.
Learn more about fourth amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements are true? (Check all that apply)
a. EMT levels of certification are standardized at a national level.
b. The paramedic has studied and is able to deliver advanced life support in emergency situations.
c. All EMTs must be 21 or older.
d. EMT-B and paramedics are trained and can respond to 911 emergencies.
Answers
The statements that are true are option A, B and D:
a. EMT levels of certification are standardized at a national level.
b. The paramedic has studied and is able to deliver advanced life support in emergency situations.
d. EMT-B and paramedics are trained and can respond to 911 emergencies.
What is the youngest age to be an EMT?While paramedics can use their additional training to provide medical aid in a variety of more specific situations, EMTs typically respond to 911 calls in an ambulance. For instance, they might function as a paramedic-firefighter for a fire department.
To determine whether the patient is experiencing cardiac arrest and to begin resuscitation, EMTs and paramedics may evaluate the scene. Additionally, they send the patient to the most suitable facility for final care, which is typically the hospital that is closest and has the greatest facilities for treating cardiac arrest patients.
Note that all Candidates need to: Be at least 18 years old. The written consent of a parent or legal guardian is required for 16- and 17-year-old applicants for Emergency Medical Responder and EMT positions.
Learn more about EMT certification from
https://brainly.com/question/28046895
#SPJ1
What is the major weakness of the literal approach to statutory
interpretation?
Answers
The most significant drawback of adhering strictly to a literal rule is the possibility that it could lead to results that seem unjust and may even go against the intent of Parliament.
What is an example of the rule taken literally?In the case of Fisher v. Bell, the application of the literal rule is shown by an example (1960). With the passage of the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act in 1959, it became illegal to sell some offensive weapons, such as flick knives, to the general public.
In conclusion, The most important downside of closely sticking to a literal rule is the chance that it could lead to outcomes that seem unfair and may even go against the purpose of Parliament. This is the most significant disadvantage of rigorously adhering to a rule.
Read more about literal rule
https://brainly.com/question/28108568
#SPJ1
What was the outcome of the Casey Anthony case?
Answers
Casey was not found guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a kid. She WAS found guilty of 4 misdemeanor counts of providing false information to law enforcement though.
Hope this helps!!!! : D
I just entered my card information on your site but I am getting continuous pop ups etc asking for more payment.
Answers
The pop-up advertisements that claim you've won are frequently only a cover for viruses and con artists.
What are advertisements?Advertising sometimes referred to as an advert or ad, is typically seen as a form of public discourse that supports a good, service, organization, or event. Some others consider the concept to be far broader than that, including any sort of sponsored advertisement intended to inform or influence
On occasion, pop-up advertisements congratulating you on winning a reward may have interrupted your smartphone browsing on other websites. Navigate to Settings while in Safe mode, then swipe to and tap Apps. From here, you can uninstall the most recent app(s) that have been installed or updated and may be the source of the pop-up ads.
Therefore, advertisements that claim you've won are frequently
Learn more about advertisements here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
as long as the child is in a safety seat, it doesn't matter if they are strapped into a front passenger seat or a back passenger seat.
Answers
What role do executive departments and agencies play in fulfilling the constitutional duties of the executive branch?.
Answers
Role of Excutive department and agencies are
They translate the laws passed by Congress into enforceable rules and procedures.Regulates major industries and organizations according to federal law.Manages the day-to-day operations of the federal governmentExecutive branch power is vested in the President of the Country who also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The president is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws written by Congress, and to that end he appoints the heads of federal agencies, including the government. The vice president is also part of the executive branch and is ready to take over the presidency when needed.
The Cabinet and independent federal agencies are responsible for the day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws. These departments and agencies have missions and responsibilities as vastly different as the Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency, the Social Security Administration, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
To learn more about Excutive department, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/15549622
#SPJ4
why isn't full employment the same as zero unemployment
Answers
Answer:There are different types of unemployment, and some are unavoidable or even necessary for a functioning labor market.
Explanation:At any given time, jobs are being created and destroyed as industries evolve, and the transition from old jobs to new is not seamless.
5. Which Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth
Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions?
Chandler v. Browning
Wilson v. Griswold
Keller v. Florida
O Mapp v. Ohio
Answers
Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the Fourth Amendment?
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution safeguards citizens from arbitrary government searches and seizures.
Only those searches and seizures that are ruled legally unreasonable are protected by the Fourth Amendment, though.
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Fourth Amendment's safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures were tightened, making it unlawful to introduce non-warranted evidence into a state court criminal prosecution.
Therefore, the supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio.
To know more about the Fourth Amendment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ1
What is the influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom
procedures called?
Answers
The influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom procedures is called the CSI effect.
The exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television programs like CSI: Crime Scene Investigation affects public perception in a number of different ways, including the "CSI effect."
Most frequently, it alludes to the idea that juries have started to demand more forensic evidence in criminal trials, placing the actual burden of proof on the prosecution.
Although this is a widely held opinion among American legal professionals, some researchers contend that while regular CSI viewers may have a diminished regard for circumstantial evidence, crime shows are unlikely to have such an impact.
To learn more about CSI effect visit: https://brainly.com/question/12000529
#SPJ9
Do you think the Pennsylvania system of prisons was too cruel or harsh or could modern prisons benefit from revisiting this early system? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:I do think the Pennsylvania system was too harsh. They was criticized for being too costly because they wanted to focus on solitary confinement. They was also criticized for the inmates physical and mental health because of solitary confinement as well. It seem as if they was going off a method of being a workshop. The system was even impractical. I don’t think modern prisons would be able to benefit off this system. While it’s true that prisons are making money off the amount of inmates, mental help should be offered as well. Physical help should be offered too. I’ve seen plenty of stories where inmates would die from their injuries in prison and no physical help is given such as fighting or even a female inmate giving birth.
Explanation:
How can we use stasis theory on Depp V Heard trial. What are ways this issue has been framed?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
To help you develop a plan for an argument, using stasis theory can help in your invention stage.In a discussion of a problem or issue, stasis theory asks you and your fellow debater to come to an agreement on an issue. For example, people have various opinions about sexism and racism. Let's take sexism, for example. Some people do not feel that sexism exists while others are adamant that it does. To come to an agreement, you could apply stasis theory by first asking if it really exists or happens (fact). Next, you and your friend would need to define and discuss what acts make up or constitute sexism (definition). Then, you have to look at the character or nature of the act. Is the issue hurtful or not (quality: right or wrong)? Finally, is there something that should be done about this concern (policy: plan of action)? These questions help develop the issue at hand. Background:Stasis theory was developed by an ancient rhetorician named Hermagoras, an ancient Greek in the 3rd century BC. He proposed four questions to help analyze or study a problem or issue, and those questions can be used as an invention help. Aristotle, another ancient Greek and philosopher and rhetorician from the 4th century, is often associated with the idea of stasis theory, and he used it primarily in the invention stage. The theory was later refined by Cicero, and orator, and other others.
Why is prosecution more important
Answers
Answer:
more important than what
some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches. given this development, what law gave the states the legal framework to do this? what additional law closed a potential loophole in interstate banking? what law changed these restrictions?
Answers
The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
because police always observe the crimes that occur, they are at an advantage in being able to quickly arrest offenders. True/False
Answers
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Police cannot always observe crimes that are committed at all times, as that would be impossible (most crimes occur in secret).
