Identify the domain and range of the relation

Vertex is at (3,−1) ; y-intercept is at (0,8) and x-intercepts are at (2,0) and (4, 0)

We know the equation of parabola in vertex form is y = a(x - h)² + k where vertex is at (h,k). Here y = x² - 6x + 8 = (x - 3)² - 9 + 8 = (x - 3)² - 1 ∴ Vertex is at (3,-1) we find y-intercept by putting x = 0 in the equation. So y = 0 - 0 + 8 = 8 and x-intercept by putting y=0 in the equation. So x² - 6x + 8 = 0 or (x - 4)(x - 2) = 0 or x = 4; x = 2 graph{x^2-6x+8 [-20, 20, -10, 10]}

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

she will need 15 pizzas because there is 30 students in her class and each will have 1/2 meaning there is 1 whole pizza per two students and 30 divided by 2 is 15

the dimensions of the printed area that will maximize the print area of the poster are 12 inches by 21 inches.
Let x be the width of the printed area and y be the height of the printed area. Then the total area of the poster, including the margins, is:

A = (x + 3) * (y + 4)

We want to maximize the printed area, which is:

P = x * y

subject to the constraint that the total area is 300 square inches:

(x + 3) * (y + 4) = 300

Using the constraint, we can solve for y in terms of x:

y = 300 / (x + 3) - 4

Substituting this into the expression for P, we get:

P = x * (300 / (x + 3) - 4)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

P = 300x / (x + 3) - 4x

Taking the derivative of P with respect to x and setting it equal to zero, we get:

dP/dx = 300 / (x+3)^2 - 4 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 12

Substituting this value of x into the constraint equation, we get:

(y + 4) = 25

Therefore, the dimensions of the printed area that will maximize the print area of the poster are 12 inches by 21 inches.

To  learn  more about derivatives click here:brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

For compute the probability of it taking at least six customers for one of them to order waffles, a Monte Carlo simulation can be used.

We have to given that;

Michelle works in a café. She has a 14% chance of a customer ordering waffles.

And, Michelle wants to know the probability of it taking at least six customers for one of them to order waffles.

Hence, To compute the probability of it taking at least six customers for one of them to order waffles, a Monte Carlo simulation can be used.

This simulation randomly generates a large number of scenarios and calculates the probability of the desired outcome occurring in each scenario, based on the given probability.

Hence, By conducting this simulation many times and aggregating the results, an estimate of the probability can be obtained.

Learn more about the probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

In programming, an "enclose" statement refers to placing a block of code within a specific construct, such as a loop or function, to control its execution and ensure proper behavior.

When writing code, it's common to encounter exceptions, which are unexpected errors or events that can cause the program to crash or behave in unexpected ways. To handle exceptions, programmers use a construct called a "try-catch" statement, which encloses the code that may throw an exception within a "try" block. If an exception is thrown, the "catch" block will execute, allowing the programmer to handle the exception and take appropriate action.

Using a try-catch statement is essential for writing robust and reliable code, as it ensures that unexpected errors are caught and handled gracefully. By enclosing code that may contain an exception within a try block, programmers can prevent their program from crashing or malfunctioning in the event of an unexpected error. Additionally, by handling exceptions appropriately, programmers can provide a better user experience and prevent their users from encountering cryptic error messages or unexpected behavior. Overall, the try-catch statement is a fundamental tool for any programmer, and mastering its use is crucial for writing high-quality code.

Learn more about enclose statement here:

https://brainly.com/question/28257624

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The dimension of the basis is {[1 0 0 2], [-1 1 0 0]}.

To find a basis for the subspace S = span {[1 -1 0 2], [3 -5 4 8], [0 1 -2 -1]}, we can use the same method as in the example. First, we put the vectors in a matrix and row-reduce it:

[1 -1 0 2]
[3 -5 4 8]
[0 1 -2 -1]

R2 - 3R1 -> R2
R3 -> R3 + 2R1

[1 -1 0 2]
[0 -2 4 2]
[0 1 -2 -1]

-1/2R2 -> R2

[1 -1 0 2]
[0 1 -2 -1]
[0 1 -2 -1]

R3 - R2 -> R3

[1 -1 0 2]
[0 1 -2 -1]
[0 0 0 0]

We can see that the last row is all zeros, so we have only two pivots and one free variable. This means that the dimension of the subspace S is 2. To find a basis, we can write the pivots as linear combinations of the original vectors:

[1 -1 0 2] = [1 0 0 2] + [-1 1 0 0]
[0 1 -2 -1] = [0 1 -2 -1]

Therefore, a basis for S is {[1 0 0 2], [-1 1 0 0]}.

Visit here to learn more about subspace:

brainly.com/question/31691975

#SPJ11

To determine whether the given functions form a fundamental solution set to the equation x'(t) = Ax, we need to check if they are linearly independent and if they satisfy the equation.

First, let's check if they satisfy the equation:

x1' = [cos(t) -sin(t); sin(t) cos(t)] [cos(t); sin(t)] = [-sin(t); cos(t)]
Ax1 = [0 -1; 1 0] [cos(t); sin(t)] = [-sin(t); cos(t)]

Since x1' = Ax1, x1 satisfies the equation.

x2' = [cos(t) -sin(t); sin(t) cos(t)] [cos(2t); sin(2t)] = [-2sin(2t); 2cos(2t)]
Ax2 = [0 -1; 1 0] [cos(2t); sin(2t)] = [-sin(2t); cos(2t)]

Since x2' = Ax2, x2 satisfies the equation.

x3' = [cos(t) -sin(t); sin(t) cos(t)] [-sin(t); cos(t)] = [-sin(t); -cos(t)]
Ax3 = [0 -1; 1 0] [-sin(t); cos(t)] = [-cos(t); -sin(t)]

Since x3' = Ax3, x3 satisfies the equation.

Next, let's check if they are linearly independent. We can use the Wronskian to do this:

W(x1, x2, x3) = det([cos(t) cos(2t) -sin(t); sin(t) sin(2t) cos(t); -sin(t) cos(2t) -cos(t)])
= 2sin(t) + 2sin(2t)cos(t) - 2sin(t)cos(2t)
= 2sin(t)(1 - cos(2t) + cos(2t))
= 2sin(t)(2sin^2(t))
= 4sin^3(t)

Since the Wronskian is not zero for any t, the functions are linearly independent.

Therefore, the given functions form a fundamental solution set to x'(t) = Ax. To find a fundamental matrix, we can simply put the functions as columns:

Phi = [cos(t) cos(2t) -sin(t); sin(t) sin(2t) cos(t); -sin(t) cos(2t) -cos(t)]

The general solution is given by:

x(t) = c1*cos(t) + c2*cos(2t) - c3*sin(t) + c4*sin(2t)

where c1, c2, c3, c4 are constants determined by the initial conditions.

To know more about fundamental solution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30465018

#SPJ11

Therefore, when their concentrations decrease from 0.5 m and 0.2 m to 0.3 m and 0.04 m, respectively, the buffer capacity decreases as well.

The solution's buffer capacity will decrease with the decrease in concentrations of the weak acid and its conjugate base. Buffer capacity is the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH when small amounts of acid or base are added. A higher concentration of the weak acid and its conjugate base leads to a higher buffer capacity. Therefore, when their concentrations decrease, the buffer capacity decreases as well.  When the concentrations of a weak acid and its conjugate base decrease, the solution's buffer capacity decreases. Buffer capacity is the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH when small amounts of acid or base are added. A higher concentration of the weak acid and its conjugate base leads to a higher buffer capacity.

Therefore, when their concentrations decrease from 0.5 m and 0.2 m to 0.3 m and 0.04 m, respectively, the buffer capacity decreases as well.

To know more about statement visit :

https://brainly.com/question/27839142

#SPJ11

The closest value to the total surface area of the new box is 275 cm².

To find the surface area of the new box, we need to first calculate the dimensions of the box. Since the original box is a rectangular prism, it has three dimensions - length, width, and height.  

Let's assume that the length and width of the box remain the same and only the height changes. So, the new height of the box will be 4 + 3.5 = 7.5 cm.

To calculate the surface area of the new box, we need to find the area of each face and add them up. The box has six faces - two rectangles for the front and back, two rectangles for the sides, and two rectangles for the top and bottom.

The area of each rectangle can be found by multiplying its length and width. Since we know the height and one other dimension (either length or width) of the box, we can use those dimensions to calculate the other dimension using the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism: V = lwh.

Let's assume that the length of the box is 8 cm and the width is 5 cm (these are just arbitrary numbers). Then, the area of each face is:

- Front and back: 8 cm x 7.5 cm = 60 cm² x 2 = 120 cm²
- Sides: 5 cm x 7.5 cm = 37.5 cm² x 2 = 75 cm²
- Top and bottom: 8 cm x 5 cm = 40 cm² x 2 = 80 cm²

The total surface area of the new box is the sum of these areas, which is 120 + 75 + 80 = 275 cm².

Learn more about surface area brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

Answer:

<QSVX= 180°

<TSR= 180°

therefore, <QST= 90°

<TSV= 90°

<QST + <TSV = 180°

ps : i'm not really sure but i think this is the answer. sorry

After John gives you 5 cookies and Kylie takes away 2, you are left with 3 cookies.

If John gives you 5 cookies and Kylie takes away 2, you would have 3 cookies left.

When John gives you 5 cookies, your total number of cookies is increased by 5. So, initially, you have 0 cookies and now you have 5 cookies.

However, when Kylie takes away 2 cookies, your total number of cookies is decreased by 2. So, now you have 5 - 2 = 3 cookies left.

Therefore, after John gives you 5 cookies and Kylie takes away 2, you are left with 3 cookies.

Learn more about cookies here

https://brainly.com/question/14252552

#SPJ11

The correct dilation is Its sides are 2 times as long as those of the original square.

When a figure is dilated with a scale factor of 2, all of its dimensions are multiplied by 2.

This means that the new side length of the square will be twice the length of the original side.

Therefore, the image of the square after a dilation with a scale factor of 2 will have sides that are 2 times as long as those of the original square.

Thus, Its sides are 2 times as long as those of the original square.

Learn more about Scale Factor here:

https://brainly.com/question/30215044

#SPJ1

Let the original amount be x

Then According to the question,

15.5 % of x is 713

15.5% * x = 713

(15.5 / 100 ) * x = 713 ( as 1 Percent =1/100)

x = 713 * 100/15.5

x = 4600

So, the original amount is 4600.

The original amount is calculated by setting up an equation using percentages, representing the original amount as X: 15.5 / 100 * X = 713. This equation is then solved to find X = (713 * 100) / 15.5, which results in X = 4600. Thus, the original amount is 4600.

The subject of the question is percentage calculation. In this situation, we can understand that 15.5 percent of an original amount equates to 713.

To find the original amount, we can set up an equation with the values provided. If we represent the original amount as X, then: 15.5 / 100 * X = 713.

To isolate X and hence find the original amount, we can solve this equation by dividing both sides by 15.5 and multiplying by 100: X = (713 * 100) / 15.5.

Calculating this gives us X = 4600. So, the original amount was 4600.

Learn more about percentages here:

https://brainly.com/question/329987

#SPJ2

Willard should interpret the 95% prediction interval for percent potassium when nitrogen is 18 ppm as a range of values within which the true value of percent potassium is likely to fall with a 95% probability.

Specifically, the prediction interval (0.87%, 1.02%) suggests that if Willard were to measure the percent potassium in a large number of soil samples with a nitrogen level of 18 ppm and calculate the prediction interval for each sample, then 95% of the prediction intervals would contain the true value of percent potassium.

The lower and upper limits of the prediction interval correspond to the lower and upper bounds of the plausible range for percent potassium, given the observed nitrogen level. In this case, the interval (0.87%, 1.02%) indicates that Willard can be 95% confident that the true value of percent potassium for a soil sample with nitrogen level 18 ppm falls between 0.87% and 1.02%. However, it is important to note that the prediction interval is based on statistical assumptions and may not capture all sources of uncertainty or variability in the data. Therefore, it is important to interpret the prediction interval with caution and in the context of the specific statistical model and assumptions used to derive it.

To learn more about lower and upper limits click here, brainly.com/question/24090516

#SPJ11

12 fluid ounces is approximately equal to 354.882 milliliters, which is very close to the stated value of 355 milliliters.

The two measurements, 12 fluid ounces (FL OZ) and 355 milliliters (ML), are very nearly equivalent.

To verify this, we can use the conversion factor that 1 fluid ounce is equal to 29.5735 milliliters.

Using this conversion factor, we can convert 12 fluid ounces to milliliters:

12 FL OZ x (29.5735 ML/1 FL OZ) = 354.882 ML

Therefore, 12 fluid ounces is approximately equal to 354.882 milliliters, which is very close to the stated value of 355 milliliters.

This demonstrates that the two measurements are nearly equivalent and can be used interchangeably when measuring the volume of the can of lemonade.

Learn more about ounces here

https://brainly.com/question/29371826

#SPJ11

The ratio of rise to run is -11/6.

In mathematics, a ratio shows how many times one number contains another. For example, if there are eight oranges and six lemons in a bowl of fruit, then the ratio of oranges to lemons is eight to six

To find the ratio of rise to run between two points, we calculate the difference in the y-coordinates (rise) divided by the difference in the x-coordinates (run).

Given the points (-2, 8) and (4, -3), the rise is -3 - 8 = -11 and the run is 4 - (-2) = 6.

Know more about ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

Answer: t is 4

Step-by-step explanation: We can cross-multiply and simplify the equation t/7 = 32/56 to find the value of t:

t/7 = 32/56(Cross-multiplying by 56) 56t = 7 x 32

(Simplifying) 56t = 224

T = 4 (56/7 divided by both sides yields 8)

T thus equals 4.

The value of t is given by t=4

The equation to be solved is given by [tex]\frac{t}{7}=\frac{32}{56}[/tex] .

Multiply both sides by 7 to get t=4

Multiplication with 7 yields [tex]t=\frac{32}{56}\times 7[/tex]

Check the gcd of the numerator and denominator , here it is [tex]gcd(32,56)=8[/tex]

Divide both the numerator and denominator by 8.

Dividing the numerator gives 32/8=4

Dividing the denominator gives 56/8=7

So, Divide both the numerator and denominator by 8 gives 4/7

Check whether it matches with the given equation

Here, if t=4 then t/7=4/7,

So, the final answer is t=4

To learn more about how to solve linear equations check these:

https://brainly.in/question/48534636

the derivative is a mathematical concept that describes how a function changes over an infinitesimally small amount of its input.

To apply Newton's method to the function f(x) = x^2 - 11 with an initial approximation of x0 = 3, we use the following formula for the nth iteration:

xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn)

where f'(x) is the derivative of f(x). In this case, f'(x) = 2x.

Using x0 = 3, we can compute the first 10 iterations as follows:

n xn f(xn) f'(xn) xn+1

0 3 2 6 2.833333

1 2.833333 0.694444 5.666667 3.316527

2 3.316527 0.019914 6.633054 3.316624

3 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

4 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

5 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

6 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

7 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

8 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

9 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

10 3.316624 0.000000 6.633249 3.316624

Thus, the first 10 iterations of Newton's method for f(x) = x^2 - 11 with an initial approximation of x0 = 3 are:

x1 = 2.833333

x2 = 3.316527

x3 = 3.316624

x4 = 3.316624

x5 = 3.316624

x6 = 3.316624

x7 = 3.316624

x8 = 3.316624

x9 = 3.316624

x10 = 3.316624

We can see that the iterations converge to the root of the function, which is approximately 3.316624.

To learn more about  function visit:

brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The equation of the circle with center (0, -4) containing the point (√44,-5) is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 45.[/tex]

The center of the circle is given as (0, -4). Let the radius of the circle be denoted by r. Then the equation of the circle can be written as:

[tex](x - 0)^2 + (y + 4)^2 = r^2[/tex]

where (x, y) represents any point on the circle.

Now we need to find the value of r. We know that the circle passes through the point (√44,-5). Substituting these values in the equation above, we get:

(√44 - [tex]0)^2 + (-5 + 4)^2 = r^2[/tex]

Simplifying this, we get:

[tex]44 + 1 = r^2[/tex]

Thus[tex], r^2 = 45.[/tex]

Substituting this value of[tex]r^2[/tex]in the equation of the circle, we get:

[tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 45[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the circle with center (0, -4) containing the point (√44,-5) is:

[tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 45.[/tex]

for such more question on circle

https://brainly.com/question/20489969

#SPJ11

The model would make the least sense to use for the value of x = -2.75.

This is because the model assumes a linear relationship between the independent variable (x) and the dependent variable (y). However, when x = -2.75, it falls outside the range of the data or the reasonable domain of the model. Using such an extreme value that is significantly different from the observed data points may result in unreliable or inaccurate predictions. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to use the model for x = -2.75.

Know more about dependent variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/29430246

#SPJ11

The required Adrella account balance after three years would be approximately $3411.9.

To calculate Adrella's account balance after one year, we can use the formula for compound interest:

[tex]A = P(1 + r/n)^{(nt)}[/tex]

where A is the account balance, P is the principal (the initial investment), r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

For Adrella's investment of $3100 at an annual interest rate of 3.2% compounded monthly, we have:

P = 3100

r = 0.032

n = 12

t = 1

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

[tex]A = 3100(1 + 0.032/12)^{(12*1)}[/tex]

A ≈ $3200

Therefore, Adrella's account balance after one year would be approximately $3194.49.

To calculate Adrella's account balance after three years, we can use the same formula with t = 3:

[tex]A = 3100(1 + 0.032/12)^{(12*3)}[/tex]

A ≈ 3411.9

Therefore, Adrella's account balance after three years would be approximately $3411.9.

Learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ1

To find the probability that a person fails the first time but passes the second time in organic chemistry, we need to multiply the probability of failing the first time (0.2) by the probability of passing the second time (0.9).

Probability of failing the first time = 0.2

Probability of passing the second time = 0.9

Probability of failing the first time but passing the second time = 0.2 * 0.9

Calculating the product:

Probability of failing the first time but passing the second time = 0.18

Therefore, the probability that a person fails the first time but passes the second time in organic chemistry is 0.18, or 18%.

To learn more about  Probability - brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

Mr. Larson will need approximately 9.75 bags to cover an area of 3900 square feet. Since you can't have a fraction of a bag, Mr. Larson would need to round up to 10 bags to ensure full coverage.

can set up a proportion based on the relationship between the area covered and the number of bags.

If Ms. Carpenter used 7 bags to cover 2800 square feet, we can set up the following proportion:

7 bags / 2800 square feet = x bags / 3900 square feet

To solve for x, we can cross-multiply and then divide:

7 * 3900 = 2800 * x

27300 = 2800x

Dividing both sides by 2800:

27300 / 2800 = x

x ≈ 9.75

Know more about fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter = 2y + 2y + 3 + 3x + 2y + 3 + 2y + 4x + 5

= 8y + 7x + 11

Step-by-step explanation:

2y+3+2y+4x+5+3x

=2y+2y+3x+4x+3+5

=4y+7x+8

Subsets a, b, c, d of the set {1, 2, 3, 4} such that r= ((a x b) u (c x d)) – (d x d) are a = {1}, b = {1, 2, 3}, c = {3}, and d = {2, 3}.

We start by examining the pairs in the set r. Notice that the first coordinate takes on the values 1, 2, 3, and 4, while the second coordinate takes on the values 1, 2, and 3. This suggests that we can take a, b, c, and d to be subsets of {1, 2, 3, 4}.

Since (1, 1) is in r, we know that (1, y) and (x, 1) must be in a x b and c x d, respectively, for some values of x and y. It follows that a = {1} and b = {1, 2, 3} (since (1, 2) and (1, 3) are in r).

Next, we consider the pairs (3, 2) and (3, 3) in r. These must come from either a x b or c x d. If they come from a x b, then 3 must be in aanand either 2 or 3 must be in b.

However, neither choice works because (3, 2) and (3, 3) cannot both be obtained in this way. Therefore, we must have (3, 2) and (3, 3) in c x d. Since 3 is already in a, we can take c = {3} and d = {2, 3}.

Finally, we need to remove the pairs in d x d from a x b u c x d. Since d = {2, 3}, we have d x d = {(2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3)}.

It follows that (a x b u c x d) - (d x d) = ({1} x {1, 2, 3} u {3} x {2, 3}) - {(2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3)} = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3), (4, 2), (4, 3)}

Therefore, we can take a = {1}, b = {1, 2, 3}, c = {3}, and d = {2, 3}.

Learn more about ordered pairs here, https://brainly.com/question/1528681

#SPJ11

The increase in interferon gamma production after a week of tea drinking is promising and warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes and control groups.

The study involved 5 participants who did not drink tea before the study started, but consumed about five cups of tea every day for a week. Blood samples were taken from these participants before and after the tea-drinking period, and the production of interferon gamma was measured after exposing the blood samples to e. Coli bacteria. The mean production of interferon gamma before tea drinking was 155 pg/mL, which increased to 448 pg/mL after the tea-drinking period. The mean difference in production for the 5 subjects was 293 pg/mL, and the standard deviation in the differences was 242. The paper suggests that the t-distribution is an appropriate method for analyzing the data.

The study indicates that drinking tea may boost the production of interferon gamma, a molecule that fights against bacteria, viruses, and tumors. The use of a t-distribution in the study implies that the sample size was small, which is consistent with the fact that only 5 participants were involved. The mean difference of 293 pg/mL and the standard deviation of 242 suggest that there was considerable variability in the results across the 5 participants. Nevertheless, the increase in interferon gamma production after a week of tea drinking is promising and warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes and control groups.

Learn more about production here

https://brainly.com/question/16755022

#SPJ11

The most common method for solving a risk analysis problem is to select the alternative with the B) greatest expected value. The expected value is the weighted average of all possible outcomes, where the weight of each outcome is its probability of occurrence.

It represents the long-term average of a random variable and is a useful tool in decision-making under uncertainty.
In risk analysis, the expected value is used to compare different alternatives and assess their potential outcomes. By selecting the alternative with the greatest expected value, decision-makers aim to maximize their chances of achieving the best possible outcome.
However, it is important to note that expected value is not the only criterion for decision-making in risk analysis. Other factors, such as the variability of outcomes, the level of risk aversion, and the potential impact of different outcomes, may also need to be considered.
Therefore, while selecting the alternative with the greatest expected value is a common method for solving risk analysis problems, it should be used in conjunction with other decision-making criteria to ensure a comprehensive and effective risk management strategy.

To learn more about random variable, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/17238189

#SPJ11

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope it's visible enough. F is for frequency and I replaced the other one by x.

It will take approximately 2.388 years (or about 2 years and 4.7 months) for the account balance to reach $10,300.

To determine the time it takes for the account balance to reach $10,300 with a simple interest rate of 6.1%, we can use the formula for simple interest:

I = P * r * t

Where:

I = Interest earned

P = Principal amount (initial deposit)

r = Interest rate (in decimal form)

t = Time (in years)

In this case, we want to find the time (t), so we can rearrange the formula as:

t = (I / (P * r))

Substituting the given values:

P = $9000

r = 6.1% = 0.061

I = $10,300 - $9000 = $1300

t = (1300 / (9000 * 0.061))

Calculating the expression, we get:

t ≈ 2.388 years

Know more about simple interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/25845758

#SPJ11

The radius of the sphere is approximately 6.7 cm.

We have,

To find the radius of a sphere given its volume, we can use the formula:

Volume = (4/3) π radius³

Given that the volume is 1203 cm³, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the radius:

[tex]radius = (3 \times Volume / (4 \times \pi))^{1/3}[/tex]

Substituting the given volume, we have:

[tex]radius = (3 \times 1203 / (4 \times \pi))^{1/3}[/tex]

Calculating this expression, the radius is approximately 6.7 cm (rounded to the nearest tenth of a centimeter).

Thus,

The radius of the sphere is approximately 6.7 cm.

Learn more about Sphere here:

https://brainly.com/question/12390313

#SPJ12