It's declared unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Would not be reviewed by a lower court, cases can't be guilty, and contempt of court is a law applying to people in court.
which of the following best develops the central idea of the text “ let them speak” by Richard J Boles
Answer:
They provide undeniable facts and statistics about the slave trade. They help readers better understand different people's experiences. They show how the effects of the slave trade continue to be felt today.
Explanation:
Students Have the choice of:
-Flavor: Vanilla, chocolate, or strawberry ice cream
-Toppings: peanuts, fudge, caramel, and whipped cream
If students have to choose one flavor of ice cream and one topping, how many possible combinations are there?
Answer: I think the answer is 12
Explanation:
After the Munich Agreement was announced, Winston Churchill gave a speech in Parliament about the decision.
Do not suppose that this is the end. This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This is only the first sip, the first foretaste of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigour, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.
Winston Churchill,
October 5, 1938
What argument does Churchill make in this speech?
Reaching an agreement is the only way to end Germany’s aggression.
Avoiding a war at all costs is the only sensible stance in this situation.
Giving in to Germany’s demands will only lead to more demands down the road.
Going to war is the best approach to solving most diplomatic problems.
Why did Napoleon keep making mistakes in order to gain his empire?
Answer:
Napoleon's desire for power and control may have clouded his judgment, leading him to make impulsive decisions. Additionally, his ambitious goals may have caused him to take risks that ultimately resulted in mistakes.
Explanation:
you need to explore what “appeasement” was in regard to Hitler’s actions in the 1930s and discuss a couple of examples. Make sure to include the response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time and why you believe they acted as they did. This is hypothetical…but how should the world have possibly reacted instead?
Answer:
Appeasement was a policy adopted by European leaders towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s, which involved making concessions to Hitler in the hope of avoiding war. The term was coined by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who sought to avoid conflict with Germany at all costs. The policy of appeasement was based on the belief that Hitler's demands were reasonable and that he could be appeased by making concessions.
One of the most notable examples of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, which was signed by the leaders of France, Great Britain, and Italy. The agreement allowed Hitler to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, which was home to a large German-speaking population. The leaders of France and Great Britain believed that by allowing Germany to annex the Sudetenland, they could avoid war and maintain peace in Europe.
Another example of appeasement was the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935, which allowed Germany to build up its navy and violate the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. This agreement was signed by the British government under the leadership of Neville Chamberlain, who believed that it would help to maintain peace in Europe by giving Hitler what he wanted.
The leaders of France and Great Britain at the time acted as they did due to a combination of factors. They were still reeling from the devastation of World War I and were hesitant to engage in another war. They also underestimated the extent of Hitler's ambition and believed that by making concessions, they could avoid conflict and maintain peace in Europe.
In hindsight, the world should have reacted differently. The policy of appeasement only emboldened Hitler and gave him the impression that he could achieve his goals through aggression. The world should have taken a stronger stance against Hitler's expansionist policies and sought to contain German aggression. It is possible that a more forceful response earlier on could have prevented the outbreak of World War II and the atrocities that followed.
Which of these actions showed continuing discrimination against women during World War II?
Answer:
Letting them do jobs that men did and then taking their jobs away after the war ended
Explanation:
(PLEASE HELP!! ONLY 250 WORD ANSWERS PLS) REPORT: ROMAN LEADER
Here is your goal for this assignment:
Write a report on a famous Roman leader of your choice
Choose one of the following leaders or individuals from the list and write a 250-word report. In your report, tell when the person lived, why he was famous, and what sort of government he lived under according to Aristotle's classification system (rule by one, rule by few, rule by many).
Alaric I Tiberius and Gaius Marcus Aurelius
Augustus Caesar Gracchus Nero
Caligula Hannibal Pliny the Elder
Cato Huns Pompeii
Constantine Julius Caesar Visigoths
Answer:
(Hope I help)
There were a lot of important Roman leaders a long time ago. One of them was Augustus Caesar, who lived from 63 BC to 14 AD. He was the first emperor of the Roman Empire and ruled for a really long time, from 27 BC until he died. People still talk about him because he helped establish the Roman Empire and brought peace to the Roman world after a lot of fighting and chaos.
Another famous Roman leader was Julius Caesar. He lived a long time before Augustus, from 100 BC to 44 BC. He was a really good general and politician and played a big role in making the Roman Empire powerful. Julius Caesar was assassinated by his own people because they were worried he was getting too powerful.
There were other important Roman leaders too, like Marcus Aurelius, who was an emperor from 161 AD to 180 AD. He was also a philosopher and wrote a famous book called "Meditations". Nero was another emperor who lived from 37 AD to 68 AD. He is known for being a really bad leader and doing some terrible things, like killing his own mother.
There were also some non-Roman leaders who had a big impact on the Roman world. Hannibal was a general from Carthage who fought against Rome in the Second Punic War. Pliny the Elder was a writer and philosopher who wrote a famous book about the natural world. And the Huns and Visigoths were groups of people who fought against Rome and caused a lot of trouble.
Overall, there were a lot of different Roman leaders who did different things and had different impacts on history.
Explanation:
How does an amendment get added to the Constitution?
1. A state convention must be called to propose an amendment. It then must be voted on by the people to achieve ratification.
2. It gets proposed by the states and then passes through Congress with a two-thirds majority vote before being voted on by citizens.
3. It must pass the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
4. It must pass through the House first and then get approved by three-fourths of the states before heading to the Senate.
Answer:
The correct answer is 3. An amendment to the Constitution must be proposed by a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then, the proposed amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) either through their legislatures or through special state conventions.
This process is outlined in Article V of the United States Constitution, which provides two methods for proposing amendments and two methods for ratifying them. The method of proposal and ratification used for each amendment depends on the circumstances and preferences of the time.
Explanation:
3. It must pass the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states. Hope this helps! :)
Choose four achievements from the Renaissance period (1300-1600). They can be from the lesson or you can research to find them—just make sure they are from the Renaissance!
One in the visual arts (painting and sculpture)
One in literature or poetry
One in science or technology
One additional achievement of your choice in any area (can be a second achievement in one of the areas above)
Describe each achievement and what was new and interesting about it—how it was different from earlier medieval art or science? Your descriptions and explanations need to be only a few complete sentences, but they should use key terms or specialized vocabulary from the lesson and thoroughly explain what the achievement was, what made it new, and one interesting fact about it. You can paste images of your achievements into the assignment, but the descriptions are what your teacher will be grading.
For each achievement, write a brief explanation of how Renaissance humanism might have inspired the person who made it. Explain how humanism could have been the root of the branch you described above.
Four Renaissance achievements are:
Visual Arts - Mona LisaLiterature - The Divine ComedyScience - The TelescopeAdditional achievement – The printing pressThe painting of the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci in 1503 is a famous Renaissance work of art. Vinci’s painting Mona Lisa emphasizes individual and human emotions, which might be derived from the reality of the period.
The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri is a narrative poem telling the story of his journey through the three realms of the afterlife: Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven. This could be inspired by the value of human experience and individualism.
The telescope, which revolutionized the field of astronomy was invented in the early 17th century by Galileo Galilei. The telescope was initially controversial, but Galileo's invention was a product of the belief that people could use their intellect to improve lives.
The printing press was invented by Johannes Gutenberg in the mid-15th century, which allowed for the mass production of books and widespread knowledge. Gutenberg might be inspired to create the printing press by emphasizing the value of education and knowledge dissemination.
Know more about Renaissance here:
https://brainly.com/question/17646820
#SPJ1
Based on the theory of supply-side economics, how does cutting taxes encourage economic growth?
It allows businesses to raise prices on basic goods.
It allows consumers to spend more money on products.
It increases government revenue to fund public projects.
It provides more money for government assistance programs.
Answer:
It allows consumers to spend more money on products.
Explanation:
This is the only answer that makes sense in most cases. When taxes are cut, typically companies do not have to pay a higher corporate tax rate, and therefore businesses usually do not have to raise prices, and may even lower prices, unless other variables are in play that may force the companies to raise prices to keep afloat.
Cutting taxes also usually mean that the government may not have as much funding, thereby not having the revenue to fund new public projects that the government may have in store. However, the government may borrow money, in which cases adding onto the national debt but providing a alternate way to fund such projects.
The same is applicable to government assistance programs. Programs may be slashed as there may not be as much funding, but the government may continue to have such services open if they borrow money.
Learn more about supply-side economics, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11773466
Huey Long’s “share our wealth” plan is often compared to president Roosevelt’s “new deal. “ choose all features that describe BOTH of these plans.
Several descriptions are shared by Huey Long's "Share Our Wealth" mission and President Roosevelt's "New Deal": their focus on fighting poverty and financial inequality.
features that describe BOTH of these plans.Both initiatives catered to those enduring the Great Depression with proposals of government inducement in the economy, investments in public sector projects, reforms of banking and finance sectors, higher taxes levied on wealthy class and business entities, plus incentives intended to develop the economy and generate jobs.
Nevertheless, these plans been heavily criticized for being too unrefined or extreme in their outlooks.
Read more on Huey Long here:https://brainly.com/question/27335556
#SPJ1
What led to uncertainly about the future of the European Union
Answer: between the EU and its wider global environment, between unity and deep diversity, and between different modes of political economy and levels of development.
Explanation:
Grain Rain is the sixth solar term in the twenty-four solar terms and the last solar term in spring. Douzhichen; the yellow longitude of the sun is 30°; it meets on April 19th-21st in the Gregorian calendar every year. Grain Rain comes from the meaning of "rain produces a hundred grains". At this time, the precipitation increases significantly. The seedlings in the fields are first planted and new crops are planted. They need the moisture of rain most. The rainfall is sufficient and timely, and the cereal crops can grow vigorously. Grain rain is the same as the solar terms such as rain, small full, light snow, and heavy snow. They are all solar terms that reflect the phenomenon of precipitation, and they are the reflection of the ancient farming culture on the seasons.
Before planting new crops, seedlings are first placed in fields. They are particularly in require of rain's moisture. Because of timely and adequate rainfall, cereal-based crops may expand quickly. As long as the rain falls at the right time and in adequate amounts.
Fresh crops are being sown in fields at the moment of Grain Rain, as well as seedlings. The moisture required for seedlings or crops to grow and flourish is provided by the rain. Rainfall is timely and adequate, enabling cereal crops to rapidly grow and collect both nutrients and water from the soil. Crops may experience drought and experience stunted growth if there is not sufficient precipitation.
Learn more about Rainfall , here:
https://brainly.com/question/28576955
#SPJ1
The question is incomplete, the complete question probably will be:
From the following explain, what happens to the seed or crop.
Grain Rain is the sixth solar term in the twenty-four solar terms and the last solar term in spring. Douzhichen; the yellow longitude of the sun is 30°; it meets on April 19th-21st in the Gregorian calendar every year. Grain Rain comes from the meaning of "rain produces a hundred grains". At this time, the precipitation increases significantly. The seedlings in the fields are first planted and new crops are planted. They need the moisture of rain most. The rainfall is sufficient and timely, and the cereal crops can grow vigorously. Grain rain is the same as the solar terms such as rain, small full, light snow, and heavy snow. They are all solar terms that reflect the phenomenon of precipitation, and they are the reflection of the ancient farming culture on the seasons.
Easy 50 points please help.
Is global population growth a concern? You should include information on some of the
following:
● birth and death rates
● life expectancy and aging populations
● growth rates
(8) How did the Industrial Revolution change America?
A. Workers took over the managment of the factories from the owners
B. A system of master craftsmen and apprentices was set up.
C. Machines were used to produce goods on a large scale.
D. There were changes in the way workers were hired and contracts were written.
THIS NEEDS TO BE AWNSERED ASAP PLEASE!!!!! IM GIVING 100 POINTS TO WHO AWNSERES THIS
The Industrial Revolution change America in the way that machines were used to produce goods on a large scale. The correct option is C.
The Industrial Revolution made it possible to produce goods in large amount than before. This led to the growth of factories and the mass production of goods, which in turn helped to fuel economic growth and development.
The use of machines and new technologies also led to increased efficiency and productivity in manufacturing, which made goods more affordable and accessible to a wider range of consumers.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/455063
#SPJ1
Any agreement or effort between two parties
Any agreement or effort between two parties is called a Bilateral effort or a Bilateral agreement.
Agreements or efforts can take many forms, such as a contract, a treaty, a memorandum of understanding, or a joint venture. The terms of agreement or effort may be negotiated and agreed upon through formal or informal discussions and may be binding or non-binding depending on the circumstances and the parties involved.
Examples of bilateral agreements could include a business partnership, a divorce settlement, a labor contract, a loan agreement or a peace treaty between two countries. Such agreements or efforts can be important for achieving common goals, resolving disputes or establishing mutual benefits.
To learn more about the agreement visit:
brainly.com/question/15420974
The correct question is-
What is the term for "Any agreement or effort between two parties"?
Which sentence in the passage compares the Persian gulf war to world war 2
Answer:
We prevailed in the fight for freedom in Europe because we and our friends were steadfast, according to the phrase that equates the Persian Gulf War to the Second World War.
Explanation:
How would you compare these two wars?
When the speaker refers to the battle for freedom in Europe, he or she is referring to World War II, when the Allies had to overthrow the Nazis in order to restore freedom to Europeans.
In order to emphasize that they are fighting for freedom in Kuwait just as they were in Europe, the speaker uses the Persian Gulf War as a comparison.
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Instructions for Short Writing Assignments:
Respond to the question in a minimum of 3 sentences and a maximum of 7 sentences for this assignment.
Use the C-E-R method:
Claim: what is your focus?
Evidence: what backs up your claim?
Reasoning: how does the evidence back up or support your claim?
Proofread with a spelling and grammar checker
SHORT-WRITING PROMPT:
How did nationalism spread, and change as it spread, over the course of the long 19th century?
The Claim, evidence and the reasoning has been made on the start of nationalism below
How to write the CER on nationalismClaim: During the extended 19th century, Nationalism permeated throughout an array of methods such as print media, instruction, cultural festivities, and political activism, bringing forth immense alterations thereafter.
Evidence: Newspapers and journals served as oratories for the divulgence of nationalist concepts border-to-border, attaining substantial viewership in its wake.
Reasoning: The extensive dissemination of Nationalism incited vital changes subsequently regarding its demeanour. Initially, it emphasised mainly on language and culture aiming to join groups with identical backgrounds.
Read more on nationalism here:https://brainly.com/question/1287645
#SPJ1
i need this "—Provide a broad overview of life for African Americans in the beginning during the colonial
period and then later, during the Reconstruction era. State a key change between these two periods in addition to
an example of something that might stay somewhat the same that you’ll expand upon later. While it’s important to
write about the commonly acknowledged aspects of life for African Americans in the beginning, challenge
yourself to find lesser-known details, such as the role of western African nations in the Atlantic slave trade " in a paragraph
Answer:
One key change between these two periods is the shift from slavery to segregation. While slavery officially ended with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, African Americans still faced systemic racism and discrimination through Jim Crow laws and other forms of segregation. Despite this, many aspects of African American culture and traditions continued to thrive, such as music, literature, and cuisine.
Explanation:
how the integration of white and black has helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in South Africa.
ALOT OF POINTS please help.
What is the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict? Why are they fighting?
What is the One State Solution? What is the Two-State Solution?
What are the pros and cons of the One and Two-State solution?
Based on the readings, what do you believe is the best solution to this conflict and why?
Write 5-7sentences about each question
Answer:
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is a long-standing dispute between Israelis and Palestinians over territory and sovereignty in the Middle East. It has its roots in the early 20th century when Jewish immigrants began to settle in Palestine, then a part of the Ottoman Empire. The conflict has since escalated, with both sides claiming the same land and fighting for control over it.
The One State Solution is a proposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict that calls for a single state to be shared by Israelis and Palestinians. Supporters of this solution argue that it would allow both sides to live together peacefully, without the need for borders or walls. However, critics argue that this solution would be difficult to implement due to deep-seated cultural, religious, and political differences between the two sides.
The Two-State Solution is another proposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict that calls for the creation of two separate states, one for Israelis and one for Palestinians. Supporters of this solution argue that it would allow both sides to live in peace and would help to address many of the underlying issues that have fueled the conflict. However, critics argue that this solution would be difficult to implement due to issues such as the location of borders, the status of Jerusalem, and the rights of Palestinian refugees.
The pros of the One-State Solution include the potential for increased cooperation and understanding between Israelis and Palestinians. It would also eliminate the need for a divisive border, which has been a point of contention for both sides. However, the cons include the potential for ongoing conflict due to cultural and religious differences, as well as the difficulties associated with creating a shared government.
The pros of the Two-State Solution include the potential for both Israelis and Palestinians to have their own independent states. This would allow for greater self-determination and could help to reduce tensions between the two sides. However, the cons include the difficulty of creating a viable and sustainable Palestinian state, as well as the potential for ongoing conflict over issues such as borders and refugees.
Based on the readings, it is difficult to say which solution is best, as both have their pros and cons. Ultimately, the best solution will depend on the willingness of both sides to compromise and work towards a peaceful resolution.
Explanation:
what was the progressive movement during the early 1900's?
Explanation:
The progressive movement had four major goals: (1) to protect social welfare, (2) to promote moral improvement, (3) to create economic reform, and (4) to foster efficiency. Reformers tried to promote social welfare by easing the problems of city life.
How did the world respond to the Darfur Genocide?
Answer:Both Britain and the US responded by sending their military to Sudan to help and have peace and order in the country. Some countries in the international community believed that Darfur already committed an act of genocide unto its the people. However, a report from the UN that it was not genocide. Still, the UN does not take away the responsibility of the people who were the reasons on what happened in Sudan.
Explanation:
The international response to the Darfur Genocide was complex and multifaceted. There was widespread condemnation of the violence and human rights abuses, with various countries, organizations, and individuals calling for intervention to stop the atrocities. The United Nations deployed peacekeeping forces, and some countries imposed sanctions on Sudanese officials. However, the response was criticized for being slow and insufficient, and debates over sovereignty, political interests, and logistical challenges hindered more robust action. The Darfur Genocide remains a tragic example of the complexities and limitations of international intervention in such situations.
Use the map below below to answer the following question: which of the claims below is most supported by the map above
Using the map to determine, the true statement is most European nations are part of the European Union. Thus, option (D) is correct.
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union which was basically created to serve it's member nations. The EU was established in 1993, and its main purpose is to promote peace, stability, and economic prosperity in Europe.
The EU has its own currency, the euro, and its institutions include the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Court of Justice.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about European Union here:
https://brainly.com/question/497078
#SPJ1
The complete question might be:
Use the map to determine which statement is true.
Most eastern European nations are candidate countries.
All of the Western European nations are part of the European Union.
All European nations want to be part of the European Union.
Most European nations are part of the European Union.
Points earned on this question:
Which of these statement best describes
absolute vulers?
Absolule Vulevs Powers are checked only.
by the military
-Absolute vulers are figureheads who
2
canyour the church's wishes
• Absolute wlers depend on the dance
& Absolure wiers have no checks on their Power
Answer:
The statement that best describes absolute rulers is "Absolute rulers have no checks on their power."
Explanation:
What is the MOST likely reason that the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is such an infamous extremist group in the United States?
O A.
OB.
OC.
O D.
their status as the only domestic extremist group
their high level of political activity and influence
their history of extreme violence and intimidation
their focus on targeting Black Americans
Answer:
The most likely reason that the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is such an infamous extremist group in the United States is their history of extreme violence and intimidation. The KKK was originally formed in the aftermath of the American Civil War to oppose the civil rights of Black Americans and maintain white supremacy in the South. They used violent tactics such as lynchings, bombings, and arson to intimidate and terrorize Black Americans, as well as other minority groups and their allies. While the KKK is no longer as active or influential as it once was, their legacy of violence and hate has made them a notorious and infamous extremist group in US history. While they have had some political activity and influence, and have targeted other minority groups, their primary focus has always been on targeting Black Americans.
Why does the author include information about the views of Bernie Sanders? Explain
Place the following events in sequence: A) A company
Incorporates; B) A company's stock rises; C) A company
Issues stock
What were the failures of France at both the maginot line and during the start of the war could the failures have been prevented? If so how?
Answer:
1. France failed to use their tanks effectively strategy-wise.
France was known to produce large amounts of heavily-armored (for the time) tanks that outclassed many counterparts of the time, such as Great Britain and Germany. The most important one that struck fear in the hearts of Germans was the Char B1 Bis family, which was a heavy tank that housed a 75mm howitzer in the hull, as well as a smaller 47mm on a turret. The tank was described to be practically impenetrable to the then fielded Panzer IIIE and Panzer IVD, which used a small 37mm gun. However, the French failed to field the tanks effectively with their infantry and battle group, and though the tanks saw limited success, they were simply bypassed and waylaid. It is also important to note that many of them were prone to break down, and so were simply abandoned.
2. France trusted the Maginot Line (and the lack thereof), too much.
France had created the Maginot Line, construction starting first in 1929 and ending in 1938, and saw to a series of bunkers created along the France-German border which housed machine gun nests and artillery pieces. However, they did not build up defenses in the Ardennes Forest, as France believed that it was impossible to maneuver tanks and troop transports in that area. What is noteworthy is that the Maginot Line did in fact serve the purpose that it did, and the troops were impervious to attacks, only surrendering when France herself surrendered following the fall of Paris to the Blitzkrieg.
3. France and her allies doctrine simply did not catch up with the times.
There are many documentations that France prepared for a World War I-esque war, which is why most of their doctrine followed the traditions founded during World War I. However, Germany simply outmaneuvered the Allies, and with speed, broke through the defenses and towards Dunkirk.
Could France have prevented the failures?
While it may be easy to simply to say "yes", it is noteworthy to remember that France and Britain had been following the policy of appeasement. To simply arm themselves and prepare for war, while it may be the most realistic choice, the Allies did want to try to avoid a 2nd World War. However, in failing to put Hitler in his place, it is the exact reason why World War II occur.
~
Learn more about World War II, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14247518
One famous story of the Buddha is the following.
Many followers are waiting for him to come and teach them. After a long wait, he comes out and says nothing. Rather, he simply picks up a white flower and held it out. What does this mean?
A.That anything the Buddha can say would be to some extent distortive of what is directly experienced.
B. That students had to learn to observe little things before they could absorb the profundity of the Buddhas' teachings.
C. That the little white flower was more real than their own self image.
The Buddha's gesture of holding up a white flower without saying anything is known as the "Flower Sermon."
Option A is correct
According to the story, only one of his disciples, Mahākāśyapa, understood the meaning of the Buddha's gesture and smiled in response. The Buddha then acknowledged him as his true disciple, saying that he had transmitted the Dharma (the teachings of Buddhism) to Mahākāśyapa.
The meaning behind the Buddha's gesture is subject to interpretation, but one commonly accepted interpretation is that the flower represents the direct experience of reality, which cannot be expressed in words or concepts. By holding up the flower, the Buddha was pointing to the essence of his teachings, which emphasized the importance of direct experience and the cultivation of wisdom through meditation and self-awareness. The gesture also implies that anything the Buddha can say would be to some extent distortive of what is directly experienced.
Overall, the Flower Sermon teaches that enlightenment is not a matter of intellectual understanding or knowledge, but rather a direct experience of reality that transcends concepts and language. It also emphasizes the importance of mindfulness and awareness in the pursuit of spiritual development.
Option A is correct
To know more about Buddha here
https://brainly.com/question/8920497
#SPJ1
