(a) The percentage of observations that differ from the mean by more than 2.4 standard deviations is approximately \(100% - 95% = 5%\).
(b) The standard deviations is approximately 68%.
I apologize, but it seems that the content you mentioned, specifically "Click here to view page 1 of the stan," is missing from your message. However, I can still provide you with the information you need regarding the percentage of observations that differ from the mean by certain multiples of the standard deviation in a normal distribution.
In a standard normal distribution, approximately 68% of the observations fall within one standard deviation of the mean, about 95% fall within two standard deviations, and roughly 99.7% fall within three standard deviations. These percentages are derived from the empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule.
(a) If we consider observations that differ from the mean by more than 2.4 standard deviations, we are looking at the tail of the distribution beyond 2.4 standard deviations. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, the area under the curve beyond 2.4 standard deviations on both tails is the same. Therefore, we can calculate this percentage by subtracting the percentage within 2.4 standard deviations from 100%. Using the empirical rule, we know that approximately 95% of observations fall within two standard deviations. Hence, the percentage of observations that differ from the mean by more than 2.4 standard deviations is approximately \(100% - 95% = 5%\).
(b) Similarly, if we consider observations that differ from the mean by less than 0.32 standard deviations, we are interested in the area under the curve within 0.32 standard deviations from the mean on both tails. Again, since the normal distribution is symmetric, the area under the curve within 0.32 standard deviations on both tails is the same. Using the empirical rule, we know that approximately 68% of observations fall within one standard deviation. Therefore, the percentage of observations that differ from the mean by less than 0.32 standard deviations is approximately 68%.
Keep in mind that these percentages are approximations based on the empirical rule and assume a perfect normal distribution. In practice, actual datasets may deviate from a perfect normal distribution.
Learn more about standard deviations here:
https://brainly.com/question/13336998
#SPJ11
2+8+14+...+ (6n-4) = n(3n-1) 3 points Prove the statement (if true), or disprove it by giving a counterexample (if false) Assume that x and y are real numbers. If x² = y², then x = y.
The statement in the first part, "2+8+14+...+ (6n-4) = n(3n-1)," can be proven to be true using the method of mathematical induction. The second part, "If x² = y², then x = y," is false.
To prove the statement "2+8+14+...+ (6n-4) = n(3n-1)" is true, we can use mathematical induction. The base case is when n = 1, where the left side is 2 and the right side is also 2. This satisfies the equation. Now, assuming that the equation holds for some arbitrary value of n = k, we can show that it also holds for n = k+1. By substituting k+1 into the equation, simplifying both sides, and using the assumption that the equation holds for n = k, we can show that the equation holds for n = k+1. Thus, by mathematical induction, the statement is proven to be true.
However, the second statement "If x² = y², then x = y" is false. There are cases where x and y are different real numbers but still satisfy the equation x² = y². For example, if x = -2 and y = 2, then x² = (-2)² = 4 and y² = 2² = 4, but x ≠ y. Therefore, the statement is disproven by providing a counterexample.
know more about mathematical induction :brainly.com/question/29503103
#SPJ11
Use Lagrange multipliers to find the indicated extrema, assuming that x, and y are positive. Minimize f(x,y)=x 2
−10x+y 2
−14y+28 Constraint: x+y=6 f( )=
We are to use the Lagrange multipliers to find the indicated extrema, assuming that x and y are positive.
We are to minimize `f(x, y) = x^2 − 10x + y^2 − 14y + 28`under the constraint `x + y = 6`.
Let us define
`g(x, y) = x + y − 6 = 0` and `f(x, y) = x^2 − 10x + y^2 − 14y + 28`.
The Lagrangian is `L(x, y, λ) = f(x, y) + λg(x, y)`.
Thus, we have to solve the following system of equations:
∂L/∂x = 2x − 10 + λ(1) = 0 ∂L/∂y = 2y − 14 + λ(1) = 0 ∂L/∂λ = x + y − 6 = 0
To solve for x and y in terms of λ,
we solve the first two equations for x and y, respectively:
2x − 10 + λ = 0 ⇒ x = 5 − λ/2 2y − 14 + λ = 0 ⇒ y = 7 − λ/2
Substituting these into the third equation:
x + y − 6 = 0 ⇒ 5 − λ/2 + 7 − λ/2 − 6 = 0 ⇒ λ = -2
Substituting this into x and y,
we obtain the values of x and y that minimize f(x, y) under the given constraint:
x = 5 + 2 = 7 y = 7 + 2 = 9
Thus, the minimum value of `f(x, y)` is `f(7, 9) = 14`.
Therefore, the answer is `f(7, 9) = 14`.
to know more about Lagrange multipliers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33157025
#SPJ11
A farmer has 20 acres to plant in wheat and rye. He has to plant at least 9 acres. However, he has only $1500 to spend and each acre of wheat costs $200 to plant and each acre of rye costs $100 to plant. Moreover, the farmer has to get the planting done in 16 hours and it takes an hour to plant an acre of wheat and 2 hours to plant an acre of rye. If the profit is $600 per acre of wheat and $300 per acre of rye.
The farmer has 20 acres of land available for planting wheat and rye. However, he must plant at least 9 acres.
The budget for planting is limited to $1500, with each acre of wheat costing $200 to plant and each acre of rye costing $100. Additionally, the farmer has a time constraint of 16 hours for planting, where it takes 1 hour to plant an acre of wheat and 2 hours to plant an acre of rye. The profit per acre of wheat is $600, and the profit per acre of rye is $300.
To maximize profit and meet the given constraints, the farmer needs to find the optimal combination of wheat and rye acreage within the available resources.
To learn more about constraints: -brainly.com/question/32387329
#SPJ11
Suppose that the functions f and g are defined as follows. f(x)=x 2
+3
g(x)= 9x
8
,x
=0
Find the compositions f of and gg. Simplify your answers as much as possible. (Assume that your expressions are defined for all x in the domain of the composition. You do not have to indicate the domain.)
To find the compositions f∘g and g∘f, we substitute the function g(x) into the function f(x) and the function f(x) into the function g(x), respectively.
Composition f∘g:
f∘g(x) = f(g(x))
Substitute g(x) into f(x):
f(g(x)) =[tex](g(x))^2 + 3[/tex]
Replace g(x) with its definition:
f∘g(x) = [tex](9x/8)^2 + 3[/tex]
Simplify:
f∘g(x) = [tex]81x^2/64 + 3[/tex]
Composition g∘f:
g∘f(x) = g(f(x))
Substitute f(x) into g(x):
g(f(x)) = [tex]9(f(x))^8[/tex]
Replace f(x) with its definition:
g∘f(x) =[tex]9(x^2 + 3)^8[/tex]
This is the simplified form of the composition g∘f.
In summary:
f∘g(x) =[tex]81x^2/64 + 3[/tex]
g∘f(x) = [tex]9(x^2 + 3)^8[/tex]
Learn more about function here:
https://brainly.com/question/11624077
#SPJ11
Minimizing Cost. Hungry Jack's produces a hot dog mixture in 500 kgs batches. The mixture contains two ingredients - chicken and beef. The cost per pound for each of these ingredients is as follows: Each batch has the following recipe requirements: 1. Batch must produce exactly 500kgs. 2. At least 200kgs of chicken. 3. At least 150kgs of beef. 4. The ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1 . Formulate the problem as a linear programming model that will minimize the total cost per batch and suggest the optimal mix. Use the graphical solution method to solve the model.
To formulate the problem as a linear programming model, let's introduce some variables
How to formulate the problem as a linear programming modelLet:
x = amount (in kgs) of chicken in the mixture
y = amount (in kgs) of beef in the mixture
Objective:
Minimize the total cost per batch
Objective function:
Cost = cost per pound of chicken * (x/500) + cost per pound of beef * (y/500)
Subject to the following constraints:
1. Batch must produce exactly 500 kgs: x + y = 500
2. At least 200 kgs of chicken: x ≥ 200
3. At least 150 kgs of beef: y ≥ 150
4. The ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1: x/y ≥ 2/1
Now, let's graphically solve the model:
Step 1: Plot the feasible region determined by the constraints.
Plot the lines x + y = 500, x = 200, y = 150, and x/y = 2/1. Shade the region that satisfies all the constraints.
Step 2: Identify the corner points of the feasible region.
The corner points are the vertices of the shaded region.
Step 3: Evaluate the objective function at each corner point.
Calculate the total cost per batch using the objective function for each corner point.
Step 4: Determine the optimal mix.
Select the corner point that minimizes the total cost per batch. This will be the optimal mix of chicken and beef.
Without the specific cost per pound values for chicken and beef, we cannot provide the exact optimal mix or the numerical value of the total cost per batch.
The graphical solution method allows you to visually determine the optimal mix based on the given constraints and cost information.
Learn more about linear programming at https://brainly.com/question/14309521
#SPJ4
a box has 4 red and 6 blue pen, a pen is drawn randomly with replacement, this is repeated 7 times. Let x be the number of red pen drawn,
1. what is probability that a red pen is drawn 3 times?
2. What type of probability distribution does x have? why?
1.The probability of drawing a red pen 3 times is approximately 0.2508.
2,The random variable X follows a binomial distribution due to the independent trials with fixed probability of success and a fixed number of trials.
1.The probability of drawing a red pen on each trial is 4/10, since there are 4 red pens out of a total of 10 pens. Since the drawing is done with replacement, the probability remains the same for each trial. To find the probability of drawing a red pen 3 times, we use the binomial probability formula: P(X=k) = nCk * p^k * q^(n-k), where n is the number of trials, k is the number of successful outcomes, p is the probability of success on a single trial, and q is the probability of failure on a single trial. Plugging in the values, we get P(X=3) = 7C3 * (4/10)^3 * (6/10)^4 ≈ 0.2508.
2.The random variable X, representing the number of red pens drawn, follows a binomial distribution. This is because each trial is independent, with the same probability of success (drawing a red pen) and the same probability of failure (drawing a blue pen). The outcomes are either success or failure, and the total number of trials is fixed at 7. The binomial distribution is characterized by these properties, making it suitable to model the situation described.
Learn more about binomial distribution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29137961
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the partial derivative with respect to y of the function f(x, y) = 3exy cos(2xy) ? - Select one: O fy = 3xexy + 2xsin(2xy) None of them O fy - fy = 3xexy – 2ysin(2xy) O fy = 3xexy - 2xsin(2xy) O fy = 3yexy - 2xsin(2xy)
The partial derivative with respect to y of the function f(x, y) = 3exy cos(2xy) is fy = 3xexy - 2xsin(2xy).
To find the partial derivative of f(x, y) with respect to y, we differentiate the function with respect to y while treating x as a constant.
First, we differentiate the term 3exy with respect to y using the product rule. The derivative of 3exy with respect to y is 3xexy.
Next, we differentiate the term cos(2xy) with respect to y. Since the variable y appears inside the cosine function, we use the chain rule. The derivative of cos(u) with respect to u is -sin(u). In this case, u = 2xy, so the derivative of cos(2xy) with respect to y is -sin(2xy) * 2x = -2xsin(2xy).
Finally, we combine the derivatives of the two terms to get the partial derivative of f(x, y) with respect to y. Therefore, fy = 3xexy - 2xsin(2xy).
In summary, the correct option is "fy = 3xexy - 2xsin(2xy)." This represents the partial derivative of f(x, y) with respect to y, taking into account the product rule and the chain rule in the differentiation process.
To learn more about derivative click here:
brainly.com/question/25324584
#SPJ11
A population has a mean = 158 and a standard deviation a 21. Find the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of sample means with sample size n-52 The mean is - and the standard deviation is o (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
To find the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of sample means, we can use the following formulas:
Mean of the sampling distribution (μₙ):
μₙ = μ (mean of the population)
Standard deviation of the sampling distribution (σₙ):
σₙ = σ / √n (standard deviation of the population divided by the square root of the sample size)
Given that the population mean (μ) is 158 and the standard deviation (σ) is 21, and the sample size (n) is 52, we can calculate the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution as follows:
Mean of the sampling distribution:
μₙ = 158
Standard deviation of the sampling distribution:
σₙ = 21 / √52
Calculating the standard deviation:
σₙ = 21 / 7.211
Rounding to three decimal places:
σₙ = 2.911
Therefore, the mean of the sampling distribution is 158 and the standard deviation is approximately 2.911, when the sample size is 52.
Learn more about standard deviation
https://brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
In how many ways 8 cards can be divided into 4 piles with 2 cards each. What rule has been used to compute that number?
In a race of 9 horses how many possible the first three place finishers are there?
A bike lock contains 4 wheels each with 8 digits on it. How many possible opening codes are there for the lock?
8 cards can be divided into 4 piles with 2 cards each in 2520 ways using combinations , In a race of 9 horses, there are 504 possible arrangements for the first three place finishers using permutations and The bike lock has 4096 possible opening codes by multiplying the choices for each of the 4 wheels.
1. To determine the number of ways 8 cards can be divided into 4 piles with 2 cards each, we can use the concept of combinations. The formula for combinations is given by nCr = n! / (r! * (n - r)!), where n is the total number of items and r is the number of items to be selected at a time. In this case, we have 8 cards, and we want to select 2 cards for each of the 4 piles. Therefore, the number of ways is calculated as 8C2 * 6C2 * 4C2 * 2C2 = (8! / (2! * 6!)) * (6! / (2! * 4!)) * (4! / (2! * 2!)) * (2! / (2! * 0!)) = 28 * 15 * 6 * 1 = 2520. The rule used here is the combination formula.
2. To determine the number of possible first three place finishers in a race of 9 horses, we can use the concept of permutations. The formula for permutations is given by nPr = n! / (n - r)!, where n is the total number of items and r is the number of items to be arranged. In this case, we have 9 horses, and we want to arrange the first three places. Therefore, the number of possible arrangements is calculated as 9P3 = 9! / (9 - 3)! = 9! / 6! = 9 * 8 * 7 = 504. The rule used here is the permutation formula.
3. To determine the number of possible opening codes for the bike lock, we can multiply the number of choices for each wheel. Since each wheel has 8 digits, the total number of codes is calculated as 8 * 8 * 8 * 8 = 8^4 = 4096. The rule used here is the multiplication principle, which states that if there are m ways to do one thing and n ways to do another, then there are m * n ways to do both.
To learn more about permutation click here
brainly.com/question/30557698
#SPJ11
If you don't have a calculator, you may want to approximate (32.003) 3/5 by 323/5 Use the Mean Value Theorem to estimate the error in this approximation.
The Mean Value Theorem is used to estimate the error in approximating (32.003) 3/5 by 323/5 when a calculator is not available.
The Mean Value Theorem states that for a function that is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on the corresponding open interval, there exists at least one point within that interval where the instantaneous rate of change (slope of the tangent line) is equal to the average rate of change (slope of the secant line) between the endpoints of the interval.
In this case, we can approximate the value of (32.003) 3/5 by using the value 323/5. Let's consider the function f(x) = x^(3/5). We want to find the error in approximating f(32.003) by f(323/5).
Using the Mean Value Theorem, we can find a point c in the interval [32.003, 323/5] such that the instantaneous rate of change of f(x) at c is equal to the average rate of change between the endpoints. The instantaneous rate of change of f(x) is given by f'(x) = (3/5) * x^(-2/5).
To estimate the error, we need to find c. Since f'(x) is a decreasing function, we know that the largest value of f'(x) within the interval occurs at x = 32.003. Thus, we can set f'(c) = f'(32.003) = (3/5) * (32.003)^(-2/5).
The error in the approximation is then given by the difference between the actual value and the approximation: f(32.003) - f(323/5) = f'(c) * (32.003 - 323/5).
By evaluating the expression f'(32.003) = (3/5) * (32.003)^(-2/5) and calculating the difference (32.003 - 323/5), we can estimate the error in the approximation.
For more information on Mean Value Theorem visit: brainly.com/question/31397834
#SPJ11
Find the Fourier Series for the following function: f(x)={−11 if −2≤x<0 if 0≤x<2f(x+4)=f(x)
Given function is, f(x)={−11 if −2≤x<0 if 0≤x<2f(x+4)=f(x)For the Fourier Series of the given function, we need to calculate aₒ, aₙ, bₙ.In general, we have, aₙ = 1/L ∫f(x) cos (nπx/L) dx ...(1) bₙ = 1/L ∫f(x) sin (nπx/L) dx ...(2) .
Where L is the length of the interval and aₒ is the average value of the function which is given as aₒ = 1/L ∫f(x) dx = 1/4 ∫f(x) dx ...(3)Since f(x) is an even function, then bₙ will be zero and therefore the Fourier series of f(x) will have only cosine terms.
Now let's calculate Then from equation (5), we have aₙ = 1/4 ∫f(x) cos (nπx/2) dx=1/4 ∫-1 cos (nπx/2) dx= - 1/4 [ sin (nπx/2) ] -1/4 ∫0 sin (nπx/2) dx= - 1/4 [ sin (nπx/2) ] ...(7)Let's rewrite f(x) using equation (7), when -2 ≤ x ≤ 0. f(x) = -1, -2 ≤ x ≤ 0= 0, otherwise.From equation (4), aₒ = -1/4. From equation (7), aₙ = -1/4 [ sin (nπx/2) ]when -2 ≤ x ≤ 0 and aₙ = 0, otherwise.
To know more about function visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30489954
#SPJ11
The time taken by people to fill a sunvey form follow a normal distribution with a mean of 100 minutes and a standard deviation of 30 minutes. Five percent of all people take more than minutes to complete this form.
5% of people take more than 149.35 minutes to complete the survey form.
Let X be the random variable representing the time taken by people to fill the survey form. Then, X~N(100, 30²) represents that X follows a normal distribution with mean μ = 100 and standard deviation σ = 30, as given in the problem statement.
It is required to find the time taken by people who are in the top 5%, which means we need to find the 95th percentile of the normal distribution corresponding to X. Let z be the z-score corresponding to the 95th percentile of the standard normal distribution, which can be found using the z-table, which gives us
z = 1.645 (rounded to three decimal places)
We know that the z-score is related to X as follows: z = (X - μ) / σ
Thus, substituting the given values, we have
1.645 = (X - 100) / 30
Solving for X, we get:
X - 100 = 1.645 * 30
X - 100 = 49.35
X = 49.35 + 100
X = 149.35
Therefore, 5% of people take more than 149.35 minutes to complete the survey form.
To learn more about random variable: https://brainly.com/question/16730693
#SPJ11
Find the indicated area under the standard normal curve. Round to the nearest ten thousandth. (a) Between z = -1.55 and z = 1.55. . area =
(b) Between z = -2.33 and z = 2.33 area =
(A) The area between z = -1.55 and z = 1.55 under the standard normal curve is 0.8792(rounded to the nearest ten thousandth). (b) The area between z = -2.33 and z = 2.33 under the standard normal curve is 0.9885
Solution:Area under the normal curve is represented as P(z₁ < z < z₂), where z₁ is the first point and z₂ is the second point on the x-axis.Using the standard normal table, the z-value corresponding to 1.55 is 0.9382. Similarly, the z-value corresponding to -1.55 is -0.9382. Therefore, P(-1.55 < z < 1.55) = P(z < 1.55) - P(z < -1.55)
The area between z = -1.55 and z = 1.55 is approximately 0.8792 or 87.92%.
(b) The area between z = -2.33 and z = 2.33 under the standard normal curve is 0.9885 (rounded to the nearest ten thousandth).Solution:Area under the normal curve is represented as P(z₁ < z < z₂), where z₁ is the first point and z₂ is the second point on the x-axis.
Using the standard normal table, the z-value corresponding to 2.33 is 0.9901. Similarly, the z-value corresponding to -2.33 is -0.9901. Therefore, P(-2.33 < z < 2.33) = P(z < 2.33) - P(z < -2.33)The area between z = -2.33 and z = 2.33 is approximately 0.9885 or 98.85%.(150 words)
Hence, the area between z = -1.55 and z = 1.55 under the standard normal curve is 0.8792 (rounded to the nearest ten thousandth) and the area between z = -2.33 and z = 2.33 under the standard normal curve is 0.9885 (rounded to the nearest ten thousandth).
Know more about standard normal here,
https://brainly.com/question/31379967
#SPJ11
A pair of dice is loaded. The probability that a 2 appears on the first die is 3/8, and the probability that a 4 appears on the second die is 3/8. Other outcomes for each die appear with probability 1/8. What is the probability of 6 appearing as the sum of the numbers when the two dice are rolled? Type as a reduced fraction. numerator = denominator =
The probability of getting 6 as the sum of the numbers when the two dice are rolled is 9/64. The numerator is 9, and the denominator is 64.
In a pair of dice, there are 6 × 6 = 36 possible outcomes. In this scenario, let's assume that the probability of getting a sum of 6 when the two dice are rolled is "X".
According to the question, the probability of getting a 2 on the first die is 3/8, and the probability of getting a 4 on the second die is 3/8. The other outcomes for each die appear with a probability of 1/8.
Therefore, the probabilities can be stated as follows:
Probability of getting 2 on the first die: P(A) = 3/8
Probability of getting 4 on the second die: P(B) = 3/8
Probability of getting other than 2 on the first die: 1 - 3/8 = 5/8
Probability of getting other than 4 on the second die: 1 - 3/8 = 5/8
The probability of getting a sum of 6 when two dice are thrown can be calculated using the formula:
P(X) = P(A) × P(B) = 3/8 × 3/8 = 9/64
The probability of the other outcomes can be calculated using the formula:
P(not X) = 1 - P(X) = 1 - 9/64 = 55/64
Therefore, the probability of getting 6 as the sum of the numbers when the two dice are rolled is 9/64. The numerator is 9, and the denominator is 64.
to know more about probability
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Let t 1
=1 and t n+1
=[1− (n+1) 2
1
]⋅t n
for n≥1. (a) Show limt n
exists. (b) What do you think limt n
is? (c) Use induction to show t n
= 2n
n+1
. (d) Repeat part (b).
(a) The limit of tₙ exists.
(b) The limit of tₙ is 0.
(c) Using induction, we can prove that tₙ = 2ⁿ/(n+1).
(d) The main answer remains the same.
(a) In order to show that the limit of tₙ exists, we need to demonstrate that the sequence tₙ converges. We observe that as n increases, the term (n+1)/2ⁿ approaches zero. Since tₙ+₁ = [1 - (n+1)/(2ⁿ)] * tₙ, the factor (1 - (n+1)/(2ⁿ)) tends to 1 as n increases. Therefore, the product of this factor with tₙ will approach zero, indicating that the limit of tₙ exists.
(b) Considering the recursive formula tₙ+₁ = [1 - (n+1)/(2ⁿ)] * tₙ, we can observe that as n becomes large, the term (n+1)/(2ⁿ) becomes negligible. Thus, the limiting behavior of tₙ is determined by the term tₙ itself. Since tₙ is multiplied by a factor approaching 1, but never exceeding 1, the limit of tₙ is 0.
(c) We will prove tₙ = 2ⁿ/(n+1) by induction.
Base case: For n = 1, t₁ = 2/(1+1) = 1. The base case holds true.
Inductive step: Assume that tₙ = 2ⁿ/(n+1) for some positive integer k.
We need to show that tₖ₊₁ = 2^(k+1)/(k+2). Using the recursive formula tₙ₊₁ = [1 - (n+1)/(2ⁿ)] * tₙ,
we have:
tₖ₊₁ = [1 - (k+1)/(2ᵏ)] * tₖ
= [2ᵏ - (k+1)]/(2ᵏ * (k+1)) * 2ᵏ/(k+1) (by substituting tₖ = 2ⁿ/(n+1))
= 2^(k+1)/(k+2)
Therefore, the formula tₙ = 2ⁿ/(n+1) holds true for all positive integers n by induction.
(d) The answer for part (b) remains the same: The limit of tₙ is 0.
Learn more about limit
brainly.com/question/31412911
#SPJ11
Find the triple integral of the function f(x,y,z) over the region W, if f(x,y,z)=x 2
+4y 2
−z and W is the rectangular box 1≤x≤2,1≤y≤4,1≤z≤2. triple integral =
The value of the triple integral of the function f(x,y,z) over the region W is 438/15. triple integral = 438/15.
Given function: f(x,y,z)=x^2 + 4y^2 −z
The rectangular box is 1 ≤ x ≤ 2, 1 ≤ y ≤ 4, and 1 ≤ z ≤ 2.
Hence, the limits of integration are as follows:
∫∫∫f(x,y,z)dV = ∫₁² ∫₁⁴ ∫₁² (x² + 4y² - z)dzdydx
Integrating with respect to z:
∫₁² ∫₁⁴ ∫₁² (x² + 4y² - z)dzdydx
= ∫₁² ∫₁⁴ [x²z + 4y²z - (1/2)z²]₁² dzdydx
= ∫₁² ∫₁⁴ [(2x² + 8y² - 2) - (x² + 4y² - 1)] dydx
= ∫₁² [4x²y + (32/3)y³ - (2x² + 8/3)]₁⁴ dx
= ∫₁² [(16/3)x⁴ + (128/15)x² - (2x² + 8/3)] dx
= [(2/5)x⁵ + (128/45)x³ - (2/3)x³ - (8/3)x]₁²
= [(2/5)(32 - 1) + (128/45)(8 - 1) - (2/3)(4 - 1) - (8/3)(2 - 1)] - [(2/5) + (128/45) - (2/3) - (8/3)]
= (62/5) + (176/15) - (2/3) - (8/3)= (186 + 352 - 20 - 80)/15
= 438/15
Hence, the value of the triple integral of the function f(x,y,z) over the region W is 438/15. triple integral = 438/15.
Learn more about Integrals from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/31315543
#SPJ11
Solve
Cos(2theta - pie/2) = -1 ,
0<= theta <= 2pie
The solutions to the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1 in the given range are θ = 0 and θ = -π.
To solve the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1, we can use the trigonometric identity cos(π/2 - θ) = sin(θ).
First, let's rewrite the given equation using this identity:
cos(2θ - π/2) = -1
cos(π/2 - (2θ - π/2)) = -1
cos(π - 2θ) = -1
Now, we can solve for π - 2θ:
π - 2θ = π + 2πk, where k is an integer.
Simplifying the equation:
-2θ = 2πk
θ = -πk, where k is an integer.
Since the given range is 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, we need to find the values of θ that satisfy this range.
For k = 0:
θ = -π(0) = 0, which is within the given range.
For k = 1:
θ = -π(1) = -π, which is also within the given range.
For k = 2:
θ = -π(2) = -2π, which is outside the given range.
Therefore, the solutions to the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1 in the given range are θ = 0 and θ = -π.
To learn more about trigonometric identity click here:
brainly.com/question/12537661
#SPJ11
The explanation below gives solutions to the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1 in the given range as θ = 0 and θ = -π.
To solve the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1, we can use the trigonometric identity cos(π/2 - θ) = sin(θ).
First, let's rewrite the given equation using this identity:
cos(2θ - π/2) = -1
cos(π/2 - (2θ - π/2)) = -1
cos(π - 2θ) = -1
Now, we can solve for π - 2θ:
π - 2θ = π + 2πk, where k is an integer.
Simplifying the equation:
-2θ = 2πk
θ = -πk, where k is an integer.
Since the given range is 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, we need to find the values of θ that satisfy this range.
For k = 0:
θ = -π(0) = 0, which is within the given range.
For k = 1:
θ = -π(1) = -π, which is also within the given range.
For k = 2:
θ = -π(2) = -2π, which is outside the given range.
Therefore, the solutions to the equation cos(2θ - π/2) = -1 in the given range are θ = 0 and θ = -π.
To learn more about trigonometric identity click here:
brainly.com/question/12537661
#SPJ11
Under the COVID-19 pandemic, assume that the true infection rate of the virus is 10%. Many health care companies in various countries have dedicated to design reliable and fast test-kit. Onc way to measure the accuracy of a test is based on the probability of a person being tested positive if this person indeed has got infected with the virus (true positive rate). If it is known that for a particular test-kit the probability of a person being tested positive when this person is actually not infected with the virus (false positive rate) is 1%. How accurate or in other words what is the true positive rate for this test-kit needs to be in order to ensure that the probability of a person indeed being infected with the virus given that the person's test result is positive is 90% ?
Expert Answer
To ensure that the probability of a person being infected with the virus given a positive test result is 90%, the true positive rate for this test-kit needs to be approximately 90.9%.
Let's denote the following probabilities:
P(I) = probability of a person being infected with the virus (10%)
P(N) = probability of a person not being infected with the virus (90%)
P(Pos|I) = probability of a positive test result given that the person is infected (true positive rate)
P(Pos|N) = probability of a positive test result given that the person is not infected (false positive rate)
We want to find the true positive rate (P(Pos|I)) that ensures the probability of a person being infected given a positive test result (P(I|Pos)) is 90%.
Using Bayes' theorem, we have:
P(I|Pos) = (P(Pos|I) * P(I)) / [P(Pos|I) * P(I) + P(Pos|N) * P(N)]
Substituting the given values:
0.9 = (P(Pos|I) * 0.1) / [P(Pos|I) * 0.1 + 0.01 * 0.9]
Simplifying the equation, we get:
0.9 * (P(Pos|I) * 0.1 + 0.01 * 0.9) = P(Pos|I) * 0.1
0.09 * P(Pos|I) + 0.0081 = 0.1 * P(Pos|I)
0.0081 = 0.01 * P(Pos|I)
P(Pos|I) = 0.0081 / 0.01 ≈ 0.081
To ensure that P(I|Pos) is 90%, the true positive rate (P(Pos|I)) needs to be approximately 90.9% (0.081 divided by 0.1).
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
Question 7 Simplify the expression 3 x 25-32 x 4-42(6-2) A. -4 B. -2 C. 6 D. 8
The simplified expression 3 x 25 - 32 x 4 - 42(6 - 2) is equal to -221. To simplify the expression 3 x 25 - 32 x 4 - 42(6 - 2), we can follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS) which states that we should perform operations within parentheses first, then any exponents, followed by multiplication and division from left to right, and finally addition and subtraction from left to right.
Let's simplify step by step:
Start by evaluating the expression inside the parentheses:
6 - 2 = 4
Replace the expression in the parentheses with the simplified value:
3 x 25 - 32 x 4 - 42(4)
Perform the multiplication operations within parentheses:
42(4) = 168
Replace the expression with the simplified value:
3 x 25 - 32 x 4 - 168
Multiply within each multiplication operation:
3 x 25 = 75
32 x 4 = 128
Replace the expressions with the simplified values:
75 - 128 - 168
Perform the subtraction operations from left to right:
75 - 128 = -53
-53 - 168 = -221
Therefore, the simplified expression 3 x 25 - 32 x 4 - 42(6 - 2) is equal to -221.
Learn more about bodmas here:
https://brainly.com/question/29756765
#SPJ11
\( 8^{-\frac{1}{3}} \log _{8}\left(\frac{1}{125}\right)=x \)
The value of x is 3/2.
To find the value of x in the given expression,
[tex]\[{8^{-\frac{1}{3}} \log _{8}\left(\frac{1}{125}\right)}\][/tex]
we can use the following formula:
[tex]\[\log _{a}b=\frac{1}{\log _{b}a}\][/tex]
Let's start by simplifying the expression.
[tex]\[\log _{8}\left(\frac{1}{125}\right)=\log _{8}(8^{-3})=-3\][/tex]
Now, let's replace
[tex]\[\log _{8}\left(\frac{1}{125}\right)\][/tex]
with -3.
[tex]\[8^{-\frac{1}{3}} \cdot (-3)\][/tex]
Using the rule that a negative exponent means to take the reciprocal of the base, we can write this as:
[tex]\[8^{-\frac{1}{3}}[/tex]
=[tex]\frac{1}{8^{\frac{1}{3}}}[/tex]
=[tex]\frac{1}{2}\][/tex]
Substituting this value for
[tex]\[8^{-\frac{1}{3}}\],[/tex] we get:
[tex]\[\frac{1}{2} \cdot (-3)[/tex]
=[tex]-\frac{3}{2}\].[/tex]
To know more about value visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30145972
#SPJ11
Solve each equation for exact solutions over the interval [0°, 360°). 5. 2 sin 0-√3-0 6. cos 0+1=2 sin² 0
The exact solutions over the interval [0°, 360°) for the given equations are: 0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians)
0 = 0°, 60° (or 0 = 0 radians, π/3 radians)
To solve the equations over the interval [0°, 360°), we will use trigonometric identities and algebraic manipulation to find the exact solutions.
5. 2 sin 0 - √3 = 0:
Adding √3 to both sides of the equation, we get:
2 sin 0 = √3
Dividing both sides by 2, we have:
sin 0 = √3/2
This corresponds to the angle 60° (or π/3 radians), as sin 60° = √3/2. Therefore, the solution over the interval [0°, 360°) is 0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians).
cos 0 + 1 = 2 sin² 0:
Subtracting 1 from both sides of the equation, we get:
cos 0 = 2 sin² 0 - 1
Using the Pythagorean identity sin² 0 + cos² 0 = 1, we can rewrite the equation as:
cos 0 = 2(1 - cos² 0) - 1
Simplifying further, we have:
cos 0 = 2 - 2 cos² 0 - 1
Rearranging the equation, we get:
2 cos² 0 + cos 0 - 1 = 0
Now, we can solve this quadratic equation for cos 0. Factoring, we have:
(2 cos 0 - 1)(cos 0 + 1) = 0
Setting each factor equal to zero, we have:
2 cos 0 - 1 = 0 or cos 0 + 1 = 0
Solving for cos 0, we find:
cos 0 = 1/2 or cos 0 = -1
The solutions for cos 0 = 1/2 over the interval [0°, 360°) are 0° and 60° (or 0 and π/3 radians). The solution for cos 0 = -1 over the interval [0°, 360°) is 180° (or π radians).
Therefore, the exact solutions over the interval [0°, 360°) for the given equations are:
0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians)
0 = 0°, 60° (or 0 = 0 radians, π/3 radians)
To learn more about quadratic equation click here:
brainly.com/question/30098550
#SPJ11
The exact solutions over the interval [0°, 360°) for the given equations are: 0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians)
0 = 0°, 60° (or 0 = 0 radians, π/3 radians)
To solve the equations over the interval [0°, 360°), we will use trigonometric identities and algebraic manipulation to find the exact solutions.
5. 2 sin 0 - √3 = 0:
Adding √3 to both sides of the equation, we get:
2 sin 0 = √3
Dividing both sides by 2, we have:
sin 0 = √3/2
This corresponds to the angle 60° (or π/3 radians), as sin 60° = √3/2. Therefore, the solution over the interval [0°, 360°) is 0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians).
cos 0 + 1 = 2 sin² 0:
Subtracting 1 from both sides of the equation, we get:
cos 0 = 2 sin² 0 - 1
Using the Pythagorean identity sin² 0 + cos² 0 = 1, we can rewrite the equation as:
cos 0 = 2(1 - cos² 0) - 1
Simplifying further, we have:
cos 0 = 2 - 2 cos² 0 - 1
Rearranging the equation, we get:
2 cos² 0 + cos 0 - 1 = 0
Now, we can solve this quadratic equation for cos 0. Factoring, we have:
(2 cos 0 - 1)(cos 0 + 1) = 0
Setting each factor equal to zero, we have:
2 cos 0 - 1 = 0 or cos 0 + 1 = 0
Solving for cos 0, we find:
cos 0 = 1/2 or cos 0 = -1
The solutions for cos 0 = 1/2 over the interval [0°, 360°) are 0° and 60° (or 0 and π/3 radians). The solution for cos 0 = -1 over the interval [0°, 360°) is 180° (or π radians). Therefore, over the interval [0°, 360°) for the given equations, the exact solution can be:
0 = 60° (or 0 = π/3 radians)
0 = 0°, 60° (or 0 = 0 radians, π/3 radians)
To learn more about quadratic equation click here:
brainly.com/question/30098550
#SPJ11
Convert the polar coordinates (− 5,π4) to rectangular
coordinates
By using the formulas \(x = r \cos(\theta)\) and \(y = r \sin(\theta)\), we converted the polar coordinates \((-5, \frac{\pi}{4})\) to rectangular coordinates \((- \frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2}, - \frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2})\).
To convert the polar coordinates \((-5, \frac{\pi}{4})\) to rectangular coordinates, we use the formulas \(x = r \cos(\theta)\) and \(y = r \sin(\theta)\).
The given polar coordinates are \((-5, \frac{\pi}{4})\), where \(r = -5\) represents the distance from the origin and \(\theta = \frac{\pi}{4}\) represents the angle in radians.
To convert these polar coordinates to rectangular coordinates, we use the formulas:
\(x = r \cos(\theta)\)
\(y = r \sin(\theta)\)
Substituting the given values into these formulas, we have:
\(x = -5 \cos(\frac{\pi}{4})\)
\(y = -5 \sin(\frac{\pi}{4})\)
Evaluating the trigonometric functions at \(\frac{\pi}{4}\), we find:
\(x = -5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} = -\frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2}\)
\(y = -5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} = -\frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2}\)
Therefore, the rectangular coordinates corresponding to the given polar coordinates \((-5, \frac{\pi}{4})\) are \((- \frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2}, - \frac{5\sqrt{2}}{2})\).
To learn more about polar coordinates Click Here: brainly.com/question/31904915
#SPJ11
If p and q are inverse functions and p(4)=7, what is q(4) ?
we know that p(4) = 7.
This means that if we apply q to 7, we will get 4.
Therefore, q(4) = 7
If p and q are inverse functions, then p(q(x)) = x and q(p(x)) = x. This means that if you start with any number and apply p, then apply q, you will get back to the original number. Similarly, if you start with any number and apply q, then apply p, you will get back to the original number.
In this case, we know that p(4) = 7.
This means that if we apply q to 7, we will get 4.
Therefore, q(4) = 7.
Another Way.
If p and q are inverse functions, then they "undo" each other.
So, if p(4) = 7, then q must "undo" the p function to get back to 4. The only way to do this is if q(7) = 4.
Learn more about Inverse Functions.
https://brainly.com/question/33195072
#SPJ11
An ordinary annuity pays 8.16% compounded monthly. (A) A person deposits $150 monthly for 30 years and then makes equal monthly withdrawals for the next 15 years, reducing the balance to zero. What are the monthly withdrawals? How much interest is earned during the entire 45-year process? (B) If the person wants to make withdrawals of 1,500 per month for the last 15 years, how much must be deposited monthly for the first 30 years?
A 30-year deposit period and a 15-year withdrawal period, the monthly withdrawals can be is to be $1,214.55. The total interest earned during the entire 45-year process amounts to approximately $557,080.26.
(A) To calculate the monthly withdrawals, we first need to determine the accumulated value of the annuity over the 30-year deposit period. Using the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity, with a monthly deposit of $150, an interest rate of 8.16% compounded monthly, and a deposit period of 30 years, we can calculate the accumulated value to be approximately $188,250.73.
Next, we need to calculate the monthly withdrawals for the 15-year withdrawal period. We use the same formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity, but this time with a withdrawal period of 15 years and a future value of $0. Rearranging the formula, we find that the monthly withdrawals amount to approximately $1,214.55.
To determine the interest earned during the entire 45-year process, we subtract the total deposits made over the 45 years ($150/month * 12 months/year * 45 years = $97,200) from the accumulated value after the deposit period ($188,250.73). The interest earned is then approximately $91,050.73.
(B) If the person wants to make withdrawals of $1,500 per month for the last 15 years, we can use the same formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity to calculate the necessary monthly deposit for the first 30 years. Rearranging the formula, we find that the monthly deposit should be approximately $412.96 in order to achieve the desired withdrawal amount of $1,500 per month during the withdrawal period.
Learn more about approximately here:
https://brainly.com/question/31695967
#SPJ11
Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of F across the boundary of the region D F=(5y-2x)i + (3z-4y)j + (5y-4x)k D: The cube bounded by the planes x= ±2, y = +2, and z = ±2 The outward flux is Use the Divergence Theorem to find the outward flux of F=9y i+ xy j-8z k across the boundary of the region D: the region inside the solid cylinder x² + y2s4 between the plane z=0 and the paraboloid z= x² + y² The outward flux of F=9y i xy j-8z k across the boundry of region D is (Type an exact answer, using x as needed) KILP
The outward flux of F across the boundary of the region D, which is the cube bounded by the planes x = ±2, y = ±2, and z = ±2, is -96. To find the outward flux of the vector field F across the boundary of the region D using the Divergence Theorem, we need to evaluate the surface integral of the divergence of F over the bounding surface of D.
First, let's calculate the divergence of F.
F = (5y - 2x)i + (3z - 4y)j + (5y - 4x)k
The divergence of F, denoted as ∇ · F, is given by:
∇ · F = ∂(5y - 2x)/∂x + ∂(3z - 4y)/∂y + ∂(5y - 4x)/∂z
Calculating the partial derivatives, we get:
∇ · F = -2 - 4 + 5 = -1
Next, let's consider the boundary surface of the region D, which is a cube bounded by the planes x = ±2, y = ±2, and z = ±2. This cube has 6 faces.
Applying the Divergence Theorem, the outward flux of F across the boundary surface of the cube can be calculated as the triple integral of the divergence of F over the region D.
However, since the divergence of F is a constant (-1), the outward flux simplifies to the product of the divergence and the surface area of the boundary.
The surface area of each face of the cube is 4 × 4 = 16.
Since there are 6 faces, the total outward flux of F across the boundary of the cube is:
Flux = ∇ · F × (Surface area of one face) × (Number of faces)
= -1 × 16 × 6
= -96
Therefore, the outward flux of F across the boundary of the region D, which is the cube bounded by the planes x = ±2, y = ±2, and z = ±2, is -96.
Learn more about integral here:
https://brainly.com/question/31433890
#SPJ11
Use De Morgan's laws to write a statement that is equivalent to the following statement. -(pvq) Choose the correct answer below. O O pv q PAq -pv-q ~PA q
Using De Morgan's laws we obtain that the statement that is equivalent to -(pvq) is: (-p) v (-q)
To use De Morgan's laws to write a statement that is equivalent to -(pvq), we can apply two separate transformations:
1. De Morgan's first law states that the negation of a disjunction (pvq) is equivalent to the conjunction of the negations of the individual propositions.
In other words, ¬(p v q) is the same as (¬p) ∧ (¬q).
2. The negation of a conjunction (¬p ∧ ¬q) is equivalent to the disjunction of the negations of the individual propositions.
In other words, ¬(p ∧ q) is the same as (¬p) v (¬q).
Applying these laws to -(pvq), we can rewrite it as (-p) v (-q).
Therefore, the statement that is equivalent to -(pvq) is (-p) v (-q).
To know more about De Morgan's laws refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/21353067#
#SPJ11
If f(0)=1 and lim t→x
t−1
secxf(t)−f(x)sect
=sec 2
x. The value of f ′
(0)
f(0)
, is: (a) −1 (b) 0 (c) 1 (d) 2
This equation has no solution for f'(0), so none of the given options is correct
lim(t→x) [(f(t) - f(x)) / (t - x)] * [(sec(x) - sec(t)) / (sec(x) - sec(t))] = sec^2(x)
The left side of the equation is the product of two limits. The first limit is the definition of the derivative of f at x, i.e., f'(x). The second limit can be evaluated using L'Hopital's rule:
lim(t→x) [(sec(x) - sec(t)) / (sec(x) - sec(t))] = lim(t→x) [-sec(t)tan(t)] / [-sec(x)tan(x)]
= sec(x)tan(x)
Thus, we have:
f'(x) * sec(x)tan(x) = sec^2(x)
Dividing both sides by sec(x), we get:
f'(x) * tan(x) = sec(x)
Since f'(0) = lim(x→0) [f'(x)], we can evaluate f'(0) by taking the limit of both sides as x approaches 0:
lim(x→0) [f'(x) * tan(x)] = lim(x→0) [sec(x)]
Since tan(0) = 0 and sec(0) = 1, we have:
f'(0) * 0 = 1
learn more about solution
https://brainly.com/question/1616939
#SPJ11
3. The demand for 'Crumble' biscuits in a supermarket has been: (a) Apply exponential smoothing to the series to forecast demand for February. Use a graph in Excel to comment on the success of the smoothing. (b) Explain to the manager how to continue the forecasting process as more data becomes available and how to detect whether there has been a 'step change' in the figures. (c) Explain why you use a small value of the smoothing constant. Overall presentation of the coursework with credit being given for quality and relevance rather than quantity and waffle
Exponential smoothing is applied to forecast the demand for 'Crumble' biscuits in February. A graph in Excel can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the smoothing technique. To continue the forecasting process, the manager should update the forecast with new data, monitor for 'step changes' in the figures, and adjust the smoothing constant accordingly.
(a) Exponential smoothing is applied to the demand for 'Crumble' biscuits series to forecast demand for February. The smoothing technique uses historical data to assign exponentially decreasing weights to past observations, giving more importance to recent data. The forecast for February can be obtained by smoothing the previous observations. A graph in Excel can be used to visually assess the success of the smoothing technique by comparing the forecasted values to the actual demand for 'Crumble' biscuits.
(b) To continue the forecasting process as more data becomes available, the manager should update the forecast by incorporating the new data into the exponential smoothing model. This can be done by adjusting the smoothing constant and using the updated historical data. Additionally, the manager can monitor for 'step changes' in the figures, which refer to sudden shifts or disruptions in the demand pattern. To detect such changes, the manager should analyze the residuals (the differences between the actual and forecasted values) and look for significant deviations or patterns that indicate a shift in the demand behavior.
(c) A small value of the smoothing constant is used in exponential smoothing to place more emphasis on recent observations and adapt quickly to changes in the demand pattern. By using a small constant, the forecast responds quickly to variations in the data, enabling it to capture short-term fluctuations and adapt to shifts in the underlying demand. This is particularly useful when there are sudden changes or trends in the demand for 'Crumble' biscuits. However, using a small smoothing constant may also result in higher sensitivity to random fluctuations in the data, so it's important to strike a balance between responsiveness and stability in the forecast.
Learn more about Exponential smoothing here:
https://brainly.com/question/30903943
#SPJ11
Records shows that there are 5% of women who have played a major role as leaders of organizations in the city of P. A study involving 200 organizations found that 6 of those organizations recorded women as the head of the organization. At the 0.05 significance level, indicate whether there is significant evidence that the proportion of women leading the organization is less than 5%.
Out of the 200 organizations surveyed, 6 had women as the head. To evaluate the significance, a hypothesis test was conducted at a 0.05 significance level. The results indicate there is'nt enough evidence to suggest that the proportion of women leading organizations in city P is less than 5%.
1. The study examined a sample of 200 organizations in city P, out of which 6 organizations had women as the head. The proportion of organizations led by women in the sample is 6/200 or 0.03.
2. To determine whether this proportion is significantly less than 5%, a hypothesis test was conducted. The null hypothesis (H₀) assumes that the proportion is equal to 5%, while the alternative hypothesis (H₁) suggests that the proportion is less than 5%.
3. Using a significance level of 0.05, a one-tailed test was performed. The test statistic is calculated using the standard formula for testing proportions, which takes into account the sample size and the observed proportion. In this case, the test statistic is less than zero, indicating that the observed proportion is less than the hypothesized proportion.
4. By comparing the test statistic to the critical value (based on the significance level), we determine whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In this scenario, the test statistic does not fall in the critical region, meaning that we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
5. Therefore, based on the data collected, there is no significant evidence to suggest that the proportion of women leading organizations in city P is less than 5%. It's important to note that this conclusion is specific to the sample and the organizations in city P, and may not be generalized to other populations or regions.
Learn more about null hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/32456224
#SPJ11
If f(x,y) and ф(x,y) are homogeneous functions of x,y of degree 6 and 4, respectively and u(x,y) = и - f(x,y) + ф(x,y), then show that f(x,y) = i2 (+²3 + 2xy 2, +1²^^u) - { (xu +y). Әхду ту 12 дуг
The given problem is to show that if f(x,y) and φ(x,y) are homogeneous functions of x,y of degree 6 and 4, respectively and u(x,y) = и - f(x,y) + φ(x,y), then f(x,y) = i² (∂³ + 2xy², +1²⁽ᵘ⁾) - { (xu +y)}/12. So, we will be calculating the differentiation of the given equation u(x,y) with respect to x and y and then show that it is homogeneous of degree 6.
Given that f(x,y) and φ(x,y) are homogeneous functions of x,y of degree 6 and 4, respectively and u(x,y) = и - f(x,y) + φ(x,y).
Now, we will differentiate the given equation u(x,y) with respect to x and y respectivelyu_x(x,y) = -f_x(x,y) and u_y(x,y) = -f_y(x,y). We know that if a function is homogeneous of degree k, then it satisfies Euler's theorem. So, we need to show that u(x,y) is homogeneous of degree 6. Let's do this by using Euler's theorem.
∴ x * u_x(x,y) + y * u_y(x,y) = 6 * u(x,y)
Now, substituting the values of u_x(x,y) and u_y(x,y) in the above equation, we get
x * (-f_x(x,y)) + y * (-f_y(x,y)) = 6 * (и - f(x,y) + φ(x,y))
Simplifying the above equation, we get
-xf_x(x,y) - yf_y(x,y) = 6и - 6f(x,y) + 6φ(x,y)
Differentiating the above equation w.r.t. x and y, we get
- f_x(x,y) - xf_xx(x,y) - f_y(x,y) - yf_yy(x,y) = 0
∴ f_x(x,y) + xf_xx(x,y) + f_y(x,y) + yf_yy(x,y) = 0
We know that a homogeneous function of degree n satisfies Euler's homogeneous function theorem, so let's apply Euler's homogeneous function theorem to f(x, y) by using it to the definition of f_x(x, y) and f_y(x, y) using the Chain Rule: By Euler's homogeneous function theorem, f(x, y) = i² (∂³ + 2xy², +1²⁽ᵘ⁾) - { (xu +y)}/12, and this proves that f(x, y) is homogeneous of degree 6.
To know more about homogeneous functions refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15395117
#SPJ11
