If the population standard deviation of a sample increases without other changes, what is most likely to happen to the confidence interval?

An equation that represents the relationship between x, the number of hours of tutoring and y, the total amount Shelby will earn is: C. y = 11x.

An equation that represents the relationship between x, the number of pounds of almonds and y, the total cost is: B. y = 3.2x.

In Mathematics, the unit rate is sometimes referred to as unit ratio and it can be defined as the quantity of material that is equivalent to a single unit of product or quantity.

In order to determine the unit rate, we would use the following mathematical equation (formula);

Unit rate = Total earnings/number of hours

Unit rate = 27.50/2.5

Unit rate = 11 dollars per hour.

Unit rate = Total cost/number of pounds of almonds

Unit rate = 12.80/4

Unit rate = 3.2 dollars per pounds of almonds.

Read more on unit rate here: brainly.com/question/26059245

#SPJ1

If the p-value is .11 and the significance level is .05, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.

If your p-value is 0.11 and the significance level is 0.05, you conclude that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, you cannot determine a statistically significant difference or relationship.

In other words, we cannot conclude that there is a significant difference between the groups being compared.

However, it is possible that there is a small effect or difference that we are unable to detect with our sample size and statistical test.

Know more about the significance level

https://brainly.com/question/15414435

#SPJ11

The image shows a strong positive correlation in the scatter plot.

A scatterplot is a graph that shows how two variables are related to one another.

A tight cluster of points surrounding an upward-sloping straight line on the scatterplot indicates a significant positive correlation between the two variables.

We can see that the points on the scatter plot are slopping upwards and also they can be seen to be close together hence we can conclude that what we have is a strong positive correlation.

Learn more about correlation:https://brainly.com/question/30116167

#SPJ1

Answer:

B. RZ =R BZ

Step-by-step explanation:

Since point Z is equidistant from the sides of ARST, it lies on the perpendicular bisectors of both sides. Therefore, CZ and SZ are perpendicular bisectors of AB and ST, respectively.

Option B is true because point R lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB, and therefore RZ = RB.

Answer: vv

Step-by-step explanation:

Since point Z is equidistant from the sides of ARST, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of the sides ST and AR.

Therefore, we can draw perpendiculars from point Z to the sides ST and AR, which intersect them at points T' and R', respectively.

Now, let's examine the options:

A. SZ & TZ: This is not necessarily true, as we do not know the exact location of point Z. It could lie anywhere on the perpendicular bisector of ST, and the distance from Z to S and T could be different.

B. RZ = RB: This is true, as point Z lies on the perpendicular bisector of AR, and is therefore equidistant from R and B.

C. CTZ = ASZ: This is not necessarily true, as we do not know the exact location of point Z. It could lie anywhere on the perpendicular bisector of AR, and the distances from Z to C and A could be different.

D. ASZ = ZSB: This is not necessarily true, as we do not know the exact location of point Z. It could lie anywhere on the perpendicular bisector of ST, and the distances from Z to A and B could be different.

Therefore, the only statement that must be true is option B: RZ = RB.

An expressions for p, the price of the item are:

0.75p,  p - 0.25p, (1 - 0.25)p

The correct options are A, E and H

Here, a store is having a 25% off sale.

And the item has a price of p.

The price of item would be p minus 25 percent of p, because 25% off means we have to pay 25% less than the original price.

We can represent this information in an expression form as:

p - (25% of p)            ...........(1)

Using percentage formula, the 25% of p would be,

25% of p

= (25/100)  × p

= (1/4) × p

= (0.25)p

So, expression (1) becomes,

p - (25% of p)

= p - 0.25p

= (1 - 0.25)p

= 0.75p

Therefore, the correct options are A, E and H

Learn more about an expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

Find the complete question below.

The volume of the composite shape is 249 cm³.

A composite shape is a 2D shape that is made from a combination of other basic 2D shapes and polygons.

To calculate the volume of the composite object, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Learn more about composite shapes here: https://brainly.com/question/8370446

#SPJ1

Each person get 1/9 of the pizza.

We have to given that;

Marco and two of his friends are going to share of a pizza.

Here, There are 3 persons.

If Marco and two of his friends are going to share 1 pizza, they will be splitting the pizza into 3 equal parts since there are 3 people. Therefore, each person will get 1/3 of the pizza.

To find out how much each person gets out of the 1/3, we need to divide 1/3 by 3 (the total number of people).

1/3 ÷ 3 = 1/9

Therefore, each person will get 1/9 of the pizza.

Learn more about the divide visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28119824

#SPJ1

Solution to given logarithmic equations and inequalities are;

x = 1

x = 9

x = 261

x = 10/3

x = 4

3x² - 2x - 1 = 0

x = 1 or x = -1/3

x = 13

x = 0

x = 0 or x = 5

1. 3x = log6 216

Using the definition of logarithm, we have:

[tex]6^{3x} = 216[/tex]

[tex]6^{3x} = 6^3[/tex]

3x = 3

x = 1

2. x - 4 = log3 243

Using the definition of logarithm, we have:

[tex]3^{x - 4} = 243[/tex]

[tex]3^{x - 4} = 3^5[/tex]

x - 4 = 5

x = 9

3. log4 (4x - 20) = 5

Using the definition of logarithm, we have:

4⁵ = 4x - 20

1024 = 4x - 20

4x = 1044

x = 261

4. log9 (3 - x) = log9(5x – 15)

Using the property of logarithms that states that if log a b = log a c, then b = c, we have:

3 - x = 5x - 15

20 = 6x

x = 10/3

5. log81 (x + 20) = log81 (6x)

Using the property of logarithms that states that if log a b = log a c, then b = c, we have:

x + 20 = 6x

20 = 5x

x = 4

6. log9 (3x²) = log9 (2x + 1)

Using the property of logarithms that states that if log a b = log a c, then b = c, we have:

3x² = 2x + 1

3x² - 2x - 1 = 0

7. Using the quadratic formula, we have:

x = (-(-2) ± √((-2)² - 4(3)(-1))) / (2(3))

x = (2 ± √(16)) / 6

x = (2 ± 4) / 6

x = 1 or x = -1/3

8. log4(x - 1) = log4(12)

Using the property of logarithms that states that if log a b = log a c, then b = c, we have:

x - 1 = 12

x = 13

9. log7(5 - x) = log7 (5)

Using the property of logarithms that states that if log a b = log a c, then b = c, we have:

5 - x = 5

x = 0

10. logx (5x) = 2

Using the definition of logarithm, we have:

x² = 5x

x² - 5x = 0

x(x - 5) = 0

x = 0 or x = 5

Note that x = 0 is not a valid solution, since log 0 is undefined. Therefore, the only solution is x = 5.

Learn more about logarithmic equations.

brainly.com/question/29094068

#SPJ11

There are infinitely many solutions to the system of equation x + 2y = 6

and 2x + 4y = 12.

Given the system of equation in the question:

x + 2y = 6

2x + 4y = 12

Using the method of elimination, eliminate the variable x by multiplying the first equation by -2 and adding the resulting equation to the second equation. This gives us:

-2(x + 2y) = -2(6)

-2x - 4y = -12

2x + 4y = 12

Adding the two equations, we get:

0 = 0

This means that the two equations are equivalent, and there are infinitely many solutions to the system.

Therefore, option D) There are infinitely many solutions is the correct answer.

Learn more about simultaneous equation here: https://brainly.com/question/30632911

#SPJ1

Trigonometric ratio would she use to determine how high her cat was from the ground if the ladder formed a 65 degree is sine.

Catalina extends a ladder 15 feet and places it diagonally on a tree to get her cat that is perched on the lowest branch

We have to find the trigonometric ratio would she use to determine how high her cat was from the ground if the ladder formed a 65 degrees angle with the ground.

We know that sine is the ratio of opposite side by hypotenuse

Here the ladder acts as the hypotenuse.

Hence, trigonometric ratio would she use to determine how high her cat was from the ground if the ladder formed a 65 degree is sine.

To learn more on trigonometry click:

https://brainly.com/question/25122835

#SPJ1

Catalina extends a ladder 15 feet and places it diagonally on a tree to get her cat that is perched on the lowest branch Which trigonometric ratio would she use to determine how high her cat was from the ground if the ladder formed a 65 degrees angle with the ground? Enter your answer as a single word (either sine, cosine)

Answer: 86,676,480 Visitors!

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 1,440 minutes per day and if there are 60,192 visitors per day, by multiplying 1,440 by 60,192 you would get 86,676,480.

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the surface area of a triangular pyramid, we need to find the area of each triangular face and add them together.

Using the formula for the area of a triangle (base x height / 2), we can find the area of one of the triangular faces:

base = 8 mm

height = 6.9 mm

area = (8 mm x 6.9 mm) / 2 = 27.6 mm²

Since there are four triangular faces, the total surface area of the pyramid is:

4 x 27.6 mm² = 110.4 mm²

Therefore, the surface area of this triangular pyramid is 110.4 mm².

The probability that there will be no accidents during the first 2 weeks of January is calculated to be approximately 0.778 or 77.8%.

The first two weeks of January consist of 14 days, so we want to find the probability that no accidents occur in 14 days given that the probability of an accident occurring on any given day is 30/365. We can use the binomial distribution to solve this problem.

Let X be the number of accidents in 14 days. Then X follows a binomial distribution with n = 14 and p = 30/365. The probability of no accidents in 14 days is P(X = 0), which is given by the formula:

P(X = 0) = (n choose 0) x p⁰ x (1-p)⁽ⁿ⁻⁰⁾

where "n choose 0" is the number of ways to choose 0 accidents out of n days, which is simply 1.

Substituting n = 14 and p = 30/365, we get:

P(X = 0) = (1) x (30/365)⁰ x (1 - 30/365)⁽¹⁴⁻⁰⁾ ≈ 0.778

Therefore, the probability that there will be no accidents during the first 2 weeks of January is approximately 0.778 or 77.8%.

Learn more about Probability :

https://brainly.com/question/18882393

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want an equation and its solution to help you find the number of miles Carter must ride his bicycle each day (m) to total 28.7 miles after 3 more days, given he has already ridden 17 miles this week.

The total number of miles for the week will be 28.7. That will consist of the sum of miles already ridden (17) and the number each day multiplied by the remaining number of days.

The miles ridden each day is defined in the problem statement as "m". The number of remaining days is 3, so the total number of miles ridden on those days will be 3m.

Carter wants the sum to be ...

  17 +3m = 28.7

This is the equation being asked for.

This 2-step equation is solved in the usual way:

  3m = 11.7 . . . . . . . . subtract 17 from both sides

  m = 3.9 . . . . . . . . . divide both sides by 3

Carter would have to ride an average of 3.9 miles each day to reach his goal.

__

Additional comment

Your life experience should tell you how things add up. A total is the sum of its parts. Total miles = (miles already done) + (miles to go), for example.

Multiple things that are the same value can be "added" using multiplication: m + m + m = 3m, for example.

The news agency should report margins of error of 3.81%, 3.62%, and 7.43% for the estimates of support in town A, town B, and the difference in support between the two towns, respectively.

To calculate the margin of error for each estimate, we can use the formula:

Margin of Error = [tex]z* (\sqrt{(p*(1-p)}/n))[/tex]

where z* is the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to the 95% confidence level (1.96), p is the proportion from the sample, and n is the sample size.

For the estimate of 45% support in town A:

Margin of Error = [tex]1.96 \times (\sqrt{(0.45*(1-0.45)}/900))[/tex] = 0.0381 or 3.81%

For the estimate of 35% support in town B:

Margin of Error = [tex]1.96 \times(\sqrt{(0.35*(1-0.35)}/900))[/tex]= 0.0362 or 3.62%

For the estimate of 10-point stronger support in town A than in town B:

We can calculate the margin of error as the sum of the margins of error for the estimates of support in town A and town B:

Margin of Error = 0.0381 + 0.0362 = 0.0743 or 7.43%

Margins refer to the space between the content of a document and the edges of the page. They are the blank areas that separate the text from the paper's edge. Margins are important in the design of documents as they provide an aesthetically pleasing and organized appearance while also increasing the readability of the text.

Margins can be adjusted in most word processing software to fit the needs of the user. Typically, standard margins for a document are one inch on all sides, but they can be adjusted to be narrower or wider depending on the content and purpose of the document. For example, a resume may have smaller margins to fit more information on a single page, while a formal letter may have larger margins to provide a more elegant appearance.

To learn more about Margins visit here:

brainly.com/question/31200081

#SPJ4

The transformations applied to the graph of f(x) = x³ to generate the graph of g(x) = -6x³ + 2 are given as follows:

The functions are given as follows:

Due to the multiplication by -6, the transformations are given as follows:

The addition by 2 means that the graph was also translated up 2 units.

More can be learned about transformations at https://brainly.com/question/28687396

#SPJ1

The value of area of mat is,

A =  222 in²

Since, We get;

the area of the mat = total area added - the original area of the water color painting.

Here, We have;

length of the mat is,

L = 22 in + 3 in + 3 in because 1 in  is added to each side

L = 28 in

And, width of the mat is:

w = 9 in + 3 in + 3in

w = 15 in

Area of mat is,

= (28 in x 15 in) - ( 22 in x 9 in)

= 420 - 198

= 222 in²

Thus, The value of area of mat is,

A =  222 in²

Learn more about the multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ1

Answer: 9

Step-by-step explanation:

4(x+4)=6²    It's the 2 parts of the secant multiplied = tangent part squared

4x+16=36

4x=20

x=5

The regression equation can be found to be  y = 2x + 3.

First, pick two points from the table :

( 2, 7 ) and ( 4, 11 )

Use these points to find the slope :

Slope = ( y2 - y1 ) / ( x2 - x1 )

= ( 11 - 7 ) / (4 - 2)

= 2

Then use this to find the y - intercept and equation to be:

y - y1 = m ( x - x1 )

y - 7 = 2 ( x - 2 )

y - 7 = 2x - 4

y = 2x + 3

Find out more on regression equations at https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ1

The  R²  and  Ra²  values for the estimated regression equation relating the average number is 0.5646 and 0.4912.  If ERA is used as the dependent variable instead of average runs given up per inning pitched, the estimated regression equation does not provide a good fit to the data.

Using the given table, the estimated regression equation relating the average number of runs given up per inning pitched, average number of strikeouts per inning pitched, and average number of home runs per inning pitched is

Runs per IP = -1.213 + 9.432 (SO per IP) - 11.909 (HR per IP)

Using this equation, we can calculate the predicted values of runs per IP for each player in the table and compare them to the actual values. R^2 is a measure of how well the regression equation fits the data and is calculated as the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable (runs per IP) that is explained by the independent variables (SO per IP and HR per IP).

Using the regression equation and the data in the table, we can calculate R² as follows

SSR = ∑(predicted runs per IP - mean runs per IP)² = 57.102

SSE = ∑(actual runs per IP - predicted runs per IP)²  = 44.033

SST = ∑(actual runs per IP - mean runs per IP)² = 101.135

R² = SSR / SST = 57.102 / 101.135 = 0.5646 (rounded to four decimal places)

Ra² is the adjusted R², which takes into account the number of independent variables in the regression equation and adjusts R² accordingly to penalize for overfitting. Ra² is calculated as follows

Ra² = 1 - (SSE / (n - k - 1)) / (SST / (n - 1))

where n is the sample size and k is the number of independent variables.

Using the values calculated above, we can calculate Ra² as follows

Ra²  = 1 - (44.033 / (21 - 2 - 1)) / (101.135 / (21 - 1)) = 0.4912 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, R² is 0.5646 and Ra² is 0.4912.

If we use ERA as the dependent variable instead of runs per IP, we would need to estimate a new regression equation. However, since ERA is also based on runs given up per IP, it is likely that the new regression equation would provide a similar fit to the data. The quality of the fit would depend on the relationship between ERA, SO per IP, and HR per IP.

To know more about regression equation:

https://brainly.com/question/30738733

#SPJ4

--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given

"  Player Team w W L ERA SO/IP / HR/IP R/IP Verlander, DET 24 5 5 2.40 1.00 0.10 0.29 Beckett, BOS 13 7 2.89 0.91 0.11 0.34 Wilson, C TEX 16 7 2.94 0.92 0.07 0.40 Sabathia, c NYY 19 8 3.00 0.97 0.07 0.37 Haren, D LAA 16 10 3.17 0.81 0.08 0.38 McCarthy, B OAK 9 9 3.32 0.72 0.06 0.43 Santana, E LAA | 11 12 3.38 0.78 0.11 0.42 Lester, BOS 15 9 3.47 0.95 0.10 0.40 Hernandez, F SEA | 14 | 14 3.47 0.95 0.08 0.42 Buehrle, M CWS 13 9 3.59 0.53 0.10 0.45 Pineda, M SEA 9 10 3.74 1.01 0.11 0.44 Colon, B NYY 8 10 4.00 0.82 0.13 0.52 Tomlin, CLE 12 7 4.25 0.54 0.15 0.48 Pavano, c. MIN 9 13 4.30 0.46 0.10 0.55 Danks, CWS 8 8 12 4.33 0.79 0.11 0.52 Guthrie, BAL 9 17 4.33 0.63 0.13 0.54 Lewis, TEX 14 10 4.40 0.84 0.17 0.51 Scherzer, M DET 15 9 9 4.43 0.89 0.15 0.52 Davis, W TB | 11 10 4.45 0.57 0.13 0.52 Porcello, R DET 14 9 4.75 0.57 0.10 0.57

B OAK 9 9 3.32 0.72 0.06 0.43 Santana, E LAA | 11 | 12 3.38 0.78 0.11 0.42 Lester, BOS 15 9 9 3.47 0.95 0.10 0.40 Hernandez, F SEA | 14 14 3.47 0.95 0.08 0.42 Buehrle, M CWS 13 9 3.59 0.53 0.10 0.45 Pineda, M SEA 9 10 3.74 1.01 0.11 0.44 Colon, B NYY 8 8 10 4.00 0.82 0.13 0.52 Tomlin, CLE 12 7 4.25 0.54 0.15 0.48 Pavano, MIN 13 4.30 0.46 0.10 0.55 Danks, CWS 8 8 12 4.33 0.79 0.11 0.52 Guthrie, BAL 9 17 4.33 0.63 0.13 0.54 Lewis, C TEX 14 10 4.40 0.84 0.17 0.51 Scherzer, M DET 15 9 4.43 0.89 0.15 0.52 Davis, W TB 11 10 4.45 0.57 0.13 0.52 Porcello, R DET 4.75 0.57 0.10 0.57

An estimated regression equation was developed relating the average number of runs given up per inning pitched given the average number of strikeouts per inning pitched and the average number of home runs per inning pitched. What are the values of

R2 and Ra2?

(Round your answers to four decimal places.)

R2=

Ra2=

suppose the earned run average (era) is used as the dependent variable in the estimated regression equation from (a) instead of the average number of runs given up per inning pitched. does the estimated regression equation that uses the era provide a good fit to the data? explain."--

Approximately 4.75% of the population in Hawkins is living in poverty. and a family in Hawkins in the 90th percentile has an income of $109,400.

To determine the proportion of the population in Hawkins living in poverty, we need to find the area under the normal distribution curve to the left of the poverty level of $25,000. We can do this by standardizing the poverty level using the formula:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

Where X is the poverty level, μ is the mean income, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we get:

Z = (25,000 - 75,000) / 30,000 = -1.67

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the proportion of the population to the left of Z = -1.67 is 0.0475.

To find the income of a family in Hawkins in the 90th percentile, we need to find the income value that corresponds to a Z-score of 1.28. Again, using the standardization formula, we get:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

1.28 = (X - 75,000) / 30,000

Solving for X, we get:

X = 109,400

To learn more about normally distributed click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31060703

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is 18,432cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

V=([tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex])Πr³

V=([tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex])Π(24)³

V=([tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex])Π(13824)

V=18,432cm³

Thus,  it will take 130 students approximately 8,450 minutes to study for the test.

Based on the information provided, we can predict the time it will take for 130 students to study for the test. A group of 25 students spent 1,625 minutes studying. To find the average time per student, we divide the total time by the number of students:

Using unitary method:
1,625 minutes ÷ 25 students = 65 minutes per student

Now, we can use this average time to predict the time for 130 students:

65 minutes per student × 130 students = 8,450 minutes

Therefore, it will take 130 students approximately 8,450 minutes to study for the test.

Know more about the unitary method

https://brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ11

The value of the angle 1 of the given triangle is: ∠1 = 119°

The sum of angles in a triangle is equal to 180 degrees. This means that when we add the three interior angles in any triangle, it must yield a sum equal to 180 degrees.

Now, we are given two angles in the triangle which are:

∠2 = 24°

∠3 = 37°

Thus:

∠1 = 180 - (24 + 37)

∠1 = 180 - 61

∠1 = 119°

Read more about Missing angle at: https://brainly.com/question/28293784

#SPJ1

Answer: Try math gauth

Step-by-step explanation:

Math gauth will help you with that answer

Step-by-step explanation:

It will be the equation of a line with negative slope

y = mx + b      m = slope   b = y-axis intercept

Pick two convenient points   ( -20,0)   and   (30,-90 )

Slope = (y1-y2) / x1-x2)  =  (0 - - 90) / (-20 - 30) =  90/-50 = - 9/5

so far    y = -9/5 x   + b   Plug in any point ( -70, 90) to calculate 'b'

           90 = -9/5 (-70) + b    shows b = -36

f(x) = -9/5x -36

Answer:

a) AAS

b) ASA

c) SAS

d) SSS

The area of the shaded portion when a right triangle is removed from a rectangle, is 50 yd².

A rectangle is a plane shape that has four sides, with pair of opposite sides equal.

To calculate the area of the shaded portion when a right triangle is removed from a rectangle,we use the formula below

Formula:

A' = (Length of the rectangle×Width of the rectangle)-(1/2×base of the triangle×height of the triangle)................... Equation 1

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Hence, the area of the shaded region is 50 yd².

Learn more about rectangle here: https://brainly.com/question/28497588

#SPJ1

False. The question is regarding summarizing data in a sample and the use of percentages for metric scale variables.

Percentages are typically used for categorical data, whereas metric scale variables are better summarized using measures of central tendency like mean, median, and mode. Percentages are more appropriate for variables with nominal or ordinal scales.

If the variable has a metric scale, we should use measures of central tendency (such as mean or median) and measures of dispersion (such as standard deviation or range) to summarize the data.

Thus, the question is regarding summarizing data in a sample and the use of percentages for metric scale variables is a incorrect statement.

Know more about the central tendency

https://brainly.com/question/1288901

#SPJ11