in right triangle ABC, m

A line plot for the data is shown in the image attached below.

In Mathematics and Statistics, a line plot can be defined as a type of graph that is used for the graphical representation of data set above a number line, while using crosses, dots, or any other mathematical symbol.

In this scenario and exercise, we would use an online graphing calculator to graphically represent the given data set on a line plot as shown in the image attached below.

In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the mode of the data set is equal to 9 because it has the highest frequency of 4.

Read more on line plot here: brainly.com/question/28741427

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

21x9

181

Therefore, the 90% lognormal prediction interval for the price of the stock after 6 months is (71.25, 87.95). The closest answer option is D) (61.91, 110.74), but it is not an exact match.

To determine the 90% lognormal prediction interval for the price of the stock after 6 months, we can use the following formula:
ln(S) = ln(S₀) + (r - σ²/2)t + σ√tZ
Where:
- ln(S) is the natural logarithm of the stock price after 6 months
- ln(S₀) is the natural logarithm of the initial stock price ($80)
- r is the expected continuously compounded rate of return (10%)
- σ is the volatility (25%)
- t is the time in years (0.5)
- Z is the standard normal distribution value for the desired confidence level (90% corresponds to Z = 1.645)
Substituting the values, we get:
ln(S) = ln(80) + (0.1 - 0.25²/2) x 0.5 + 0.25√0.5 x 1.645
ln(S) = 4.382 + 0.089
ln(S) = 4.471
To convert back to the stock price, we take the exponential of both sides:
S = e⁴.⁴⁷¹
S ≈ 87.95
The lower bound of the prediction interval is obtained by using Z = -1.645:
ln(S) = ln(80) + (0.1 - 0.25²/2) x 0.5 - 0.25√0.5 x 1.645
ln(S) = 4.382 - 0.108
ln(S) = 4.274
S = e⁴.²⁷⁴
S ≈ 71.25

Learn more about standard normal distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31379967

#SPJ11

Answer: Kyle will earn 6h dollars babysitting for h hours, and 6 x 4 = 24 dollars babysitting for 4 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

14/13

Step-by-step explanation:

40/3

Make sure to keep all other variables constant, such as the brand and size of the popcorn bag, the amount of oil and seasoning used, and the type of microwave used.

1. Select multiple brands of microwave popcorn to test in the experiment.
2. For each brand, follow the recommended cooking instructions found on the packaging. This will serve as the control group.
3. Next, for each brand, design alternative microwaving procedures, such as adjusting the cooking time, using different power settings, or including a pre-heating step.
4. Randomly assign these alternative procedures to different bags of each brand, ensuring that you have at least one bag per procedure per brand.
5. Microwave each bag following its assigned procedure.
6. After microwaving, carefully count the number of popped kernels and unpopped kernels in each bag.
7. Calculate the proportion of popped kernels for each bag by dividing the number of popped kernels by the total number of kernels (popped and unpopped).
8. Compare the results for each procedure within each brand and identify which procedure yields the highest variable proportion of popped kernels.
9. Further, compare the results across all brands to determine if any particular procedure is consistently effective for multiple brands.

By following this experimental design, you should be able to determine the most effective microwaving procedure for achieving the highest proportion of popped kernels in a bag of popcorn.

Complete Question:

Your goal is to find a better procedure for microwaving a bag of popcorn to cook the best in terms of proportion of popped kernels) popped bag. You plan to design an experiment to determine which brand to use, how long to cook each bag in the microwave and what power setting to use. Some reasonable ranges for the factors from past experience: Cooking time (3 and 5 minutes), Power levels on the microwave oven (settings 5 and 10) and Popcorn brand (Kroger or Orville) (1) What type of design of experiment you will suggest for this study. (ii) Do you suspect that the effect of any factor on the proportion of popped kernels may depend on the value of some other factor? If yes, how will you add such an effect in the model? (iii) You decide to include all possible two-factor interactions besides main effects. (a) Write down the statistical model and its assumptions. (b) What will be the minimum number of runs needed to perform the experiment based on the effects you have added to the model?

Learn more about Variable:

brainly.com/question/29583350

#SPJ11

There are 17,100,720 possible outcomes for the second round of the competition.

There are 142,506,000 possible outcomes for the second round of the competition. This can be calculated using the formula for permutations, which is n!/(n-r)!, where n is the total number of pianists (30) and r is the number of winners being selected (5). Therefore, 30!/25! = 30 x 29 x 28 x 27 x 26 = 142,506,000.
In the second round, the judges select the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth place winners from among the 30 pianists who advanced. To calculate the number of possible outcomes, we use the permutation formula, which is P(n, r) = n! / (n-r)!, where n is the total number of pianists, and r is the number of winners.

In this case, n = 30 and r = 5. So, P(30, 5) = 30! / (30-5)! = 30! / 25!

Calculating this, we get P(30, 5) = 30 × 29 × 28 × 27 × 26 = 17,100,720.

Know more about permutations here:

https://brainly.com/question/30649574

#SPJ11

Answer:

3.16 x 10⁵ or 316,000

Step-by-step explanation:

We can start by dividing the mass of the sun by the combined mass of the moon, Earth, and Pluto:

1.898 x 10³⁰ / 5.986 x 10²⁴ ≈ 3.16 x 10⁵

This means that approximately 3.16 x 10⁵ (or 316,000) combined masses of the moon, Earth, and Pluto are needed to equal the mass of the sun.

When the width is 4 inches, the area of the photograph is 20 square inches.

To write a polynomial that represents the area of the photograph, we need to use the formula for the area of a rectangle, which is A = l x w (where A is the area, l is the length, and w is the width).

From the given information, we know that the length (l) is 3 inches less than twice the width (w). So, we can write:

l = 2w - 3

Substituting this expression for l into the formula for the area, we get:

A = (2w - 3) x w

Simplifying this expression, we get:

A = 2w^2 - 3w

This is the polynomial that represents the area of the photograph.

To find the area of the photograph when the width is 4 inches, we simply need to substitute w = 4 into the polynomial we just found:

A = 2(4)^2 - 3(4)
A = 32 - 12
A = 20

Know more about polynomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

Answer: Based on the given scatter plot, it appears that the relationship between the number of mold spores and the number of hours is non-linear and may be better represented by an exponential function rather than a linear function. Therefore, option 4 (an exponential function) would best model this data.

Step-by-step explanation: In the given scatter plot, the number of mold spores is decreasing as the number of hours increases, but not at a constant rate. This indicates that the relationship between the two variables is non-linear.

An exponential function is a type of non-linear function that has the general form:

y = ab^x

where a and b are constants and x is the input variable. In this case, we can think of the number of mold spores as the output variable (y) and the number of hours as the input variable (x).

An exponential function is a good choice for modeling this data because it captures the idea that the rate of mold growth (or decay) changes over time. For example, when there are many mold spores present, the rate of growth may slow down due to competition for resources, and as the number of spores decreases, the rate of decay may also slow down due to the decreased availability of food for the mold.

In contrast, a linear function (such as a straight line) assumes that the rate of change is constant over time, which does not seem to be the case for this data. Therefore, an exponential function would be a better fit for modeling the relationship between the number of mold spores and the number of hours in this experiment.

The pooled standard deviatio is 5.746. We can say with 95% confidence that the true difference between the population means falls between -4.019 and 0.719.

First, we need to calculate the pooled standard deviation:

s_p = sqrt(((n1-1)*s1^2 + (n2-1)*s2^2)/(n1+n2-2))

s_p = sqrt(((6-1)*5.9^2 + (7-1)*5.6^2)/(6+7-2))

s_p = 5.746

Next, we can calculate the t-statistic:

t = ((x1 - x2) - 0) / (s_p * sqrt(1/n1 + 1/n2))

t = ((72.9 - 75.1) - 0) / (5.746 * sqrt(1/6 + 1/7))

t = -0.956

Using a t-distribution table with conservative degrees of freedom (df = min(n1-1, n2-1) = 5), we find that the critical value for a one-tailed test with α=0.05 is -1.833. Since our calculated t-statistic is greater than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we cannot conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the first population mean is less than the second population mean.

As for the confidence interval, we can use the formula:

(x1 - x2) ± t_(α/2, df) * s_p * sqrt(1/n1 + 1/n2)

Plugging in the values:

(72.9 - 75.1) ± t_(0.025, 5) * 5.746 * sqrt(1/6 + 1/7)

-4.019 < μ1 - μ2 < 0.719

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true difference between the population means falls between -4.019 and 0.719.

Visit here to learn more about standard deviation brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Based on these results, we would conclude that on average, the population of all ferrets tend to decrease in weight when exposed to the virus.

Based on the results of the hypothesis test in part (b) and the confidence interval in part (c), we can conclude that the population mean weight of ferrets tends to decrease when exposed to the virus.

In part (b), we found that the p-value was less than the significance level of 0.05, which means that we reject the null hypothesis that the mean weight of ferrets is not affected by the virus. This indicates that there is strong evidence that the virus has a significant effect on the weight of ferrets.

In part (c), we constructed a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean weight of ferrets before and after exposure to the virus. The interval was (−0.643,−0.057), which does not contain 0. This means that we are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean weights is negative, indicating that the weight tends to decrease after exposure to the virus.

Therefore, based on these results, we would conclude that on average, the population of all ferrets tend to decrease in weight when exposed to the virus.

To learn more about virus visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1427968

#SPJ11

You need to manipulate the equations to get the same coefficient for one of the variables and then add or subtract the equations to eliminate that variable.

When using the method of elimination to solve the system of equations, the goal is to eliminate one of the variables by adding or subtracting the equations. To do this, you want to choose a coefficient for one of the variables that is the same in both equations, but with opposite signs.

For example, if the system of equations is:

2x + 3y = 7
4x - 5y = -13

You could multiply the first equation by -2 to get:

-4x - 6y = -14

Then, when you add this equation to the second equation, the x variable is eliminated:

-4x - 6y + 4x - 5y = -14 - 13

Simplifying this equation gives you:

-11y = -27

To find the value of y, you would divide both sides by -11:

y = 27/11

To find the value of x, you would substitute this value of y into one of the original equations and solve for x.

As for the specific question of what is the result of adding the two equations together, it depends on the coefficients of the variables in the equations. You need to manipulate the equations to get the same coefficient for one of the variables and then add or subtract the equations to eliminate that variable.

It looks like you didn't provide the system of equations you need help with. Please provide the two equations, and I'll gladly help you with the method of elimination and the result of adding them together.

Learn more about variable at: brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

The meaning of "directly proportional" refers to a relationship between two variables, where when one variable increases, the other variable also increases by a constant factor, and vice versa.

When two variables are directly proportional, it means that as one variable increases or decreases, the other variable will also increase or decrease in the same proportion. In other words, there is a constant ratio between the two variables. For example, if the speed of a car is directly proportional to the distance it travels, then as the car's speed increases, the distance it travels will also increase at the same rate.

The meaning of "directly proportional" refers to a relationship between two variables, where when one variable increases, the other variable also increases by a constant factor, and vice versa. In other words, as one variable goes up, the other does too, and their ratio remains constant. This relationship can be represented mathematically as y = kx, where y and x are the two variables and k is the constant of proportionality.

Learn more about proportional here:

https://brainly.com/question/31266854

#SPJ11

I'll explain the concept and steps to find the measure of each angle in an inscribed quadrilateral.

In an inscribed quadrilateral (a quadrilateral with its vertices on a circle), the opposite angles are supplementary. In other words, the sum of opposite angles is 180 degrees. This relationship between angles can help us find the measure of each angle in the quadrilateral.

Let's denote the angles of quadrilateral ABCD as follows:
∠A, ∠B, ∠C, and ∠D.

Since opposite angles are supplementary:
∠A + ∠C = 180°
∠B + ∠D = 180°

To find the measure of  a each angle, you'll need to be given at least two angle measures or additional information about the relationships between the angles. Without specific information, we can only provide the general relationships between the angles in an inscribed quadrilateral.
Visit here to learn more about quadrilateral :

brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ11

the tradeoff between x and y is such that the weighted sum of their square roots is constant.

To derive the equation for the indifference curve, we need to find the combinations of x and y that yield the same level of utility U. Mathematically, we can express this as:

U(x, y) = constant

Substituting the given utility function, we get:

(.6x.5 + .4y.5)1/.5 = constant

Simplifying, we get:

(.36x + .16y) = constant^2

Dividing by the constant squared, we get:

(.36x + .16y)/constant^2 = 1

This is the equation for the indifference curve, which represents all the combinations of x and y that yield the same level of utility U. The constant represents the level of utility, and the equation shows that the tradeoff between x and y is such that the weighted sum of their square roots is constant.

learn about utility function,

https://brainly.com/question/31498128,

#SPJ11

The forecasting method that considers a number of variables, together with the effects of each on the item of interest, is called the "Multiple Regression" method.

The forecasting method that considers a number of variables, together with the effects of each on the item of interest, is called multiple regression analysis. This method takes into account various independent variables that can affect the outcome of interest and use statistical techniques to estimate their impact on the forecasted variable.

By analyzing multiple variables, this method provides a more comprehensive and accurate prediction than other forecasting methods that rely on only a single variable. In this method, various independent variables are used to predict the value of a dependent variable (the item of interest). By analyzing the relationships between these variables, more accurate forecasts can be generated.

Learn more about Multiple Regression:

brainly.com/question/3737733

#SPJ11

Answer:

31

Step-by-step explanation:

Note: I'm assuming that the three values after your expression (49, 58, and 31) are the possible answers. Let me know if they're actually a part of the expression.

Following PEMDAS, we're going to have to start by evaluating the expression inside the parentheses. That expression is 16 - 9, which is equivalent to 7.

Now, we're left with this expression: 3 + 4(7). Still following PEMDAS, we're going to have to evaluate the multiplication next. 4(7) = 28, so we are now left with the simple addition problem 3 + 28, and this is equal to 31. The entire work with no explanation is shown below.

3 + 4(16 - 9) = 3 + 4(7) = 3 + 28 = 31

Hopefully, that's helpful. Let me know if you need further clarification. :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-1/3 and - 2/3

can be written as

-11/33 and -22/33

so 4 rational numbers between these are:

-13/33, -14/33, -17/33 and - 19/33.

Based on the information, the most appropriate graph for this situation would be option A.

To identify the most appropriate graph for this situation we must analyze the data. In this case we have the relationship of the toppings with the number of customers who prefer each variety.

Now, We get;

Due to the above, we could affirm that the best option is A because it shows the number of people who prefer each topping in the order in which the table organizes them.

Learn more about toppings in:

brainly.com/question/29054906

#SPJ1

The percentage of items that cost less than $10.5 is 44.78%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the properties of the exponential distribution. We know that the mean cost per item is $13.5, which means that the parameter λ (the rate parameter) of the exponential distribution is 1/13.5 = 0.0741.

To find the percentage of items that cost less than $10.5, we need to calculate the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the exponential distribution at $10.5:

CDF($10.5$) = 1 - e^(-λ*$10.5$) = 1 - e^(-0.0741*$10.5$) = 0.4478

Know more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ11

The florist may make 10 centerpieces with each centerpiece holding 12 flowers, costing the customer $300, using 1.5 roses, 3 lilies, and 1.5 irises.

a) Let's denote the number of roses, lilies, and irises in each centerpiece by r, l, and i, respectively. Then we have the following system of linear equations:

12 = r + l + i (since each centerpiece contains 12 flowers)

r = 2(i + l) (since there are twice as many roses as the number of irises and lilies combined)

2.5r + 4l + 2i = 30 (since the cost of each centerpiece is $30 and we are given the prices of each type of flower)

b) We may organize the variable coefficients into a matrix and the constants into a vector to get the matrix equation. The matrix equation will have the form Ax = b, where A is the coefficients matrix, x is the variable vector, and b is the constant vector. Here are the facts:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\2 & -2 & -2 \\2.5 & 4 & 2 \\\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}r \\l \\i \\\end{pmatrix}$=\begin{pmatrix}12 \\0 \\30 \\\end{pmatrix}$[/tex]

c) We must solve the matrix equation using the inverse of the coefficient matrix in order to determine how many flowers of each kind the florist may utilize to build the 10 centerpieces. When we multiply both sides of the equation by the coefficient matrix's inverse, we obtain:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\2 & -2 & -2 \\2.5 & 4 & 2 \\\end{pmatrix}^{-1} \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\2 & -2 & -2 \\2.5 & 4 & 2 \\\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}r \\l \\i \\\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\2 & -2 & -2 \\2.5 & 4 & 2 \\\end{pmatrix}^{-1}\begin{pmatrix}12 \\0 \\30 \\\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix}r \\ l \\ i\\ \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1.5 \\3 \\1.5\\ \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Therefore, the florist can use 1.5 roses, 3 lilies, and 1.5 irises in each centerpiece to create 10 centerpieces with each centerpiece containing 12 flowers, and the customer spending $300.

Learn more about matrices here:

https://brainly.com/question/11367104

#SPJ1

This suggests that the mean age of teachers at Ravenwood High School is less than 47.6. Based on the given information, we have two hypotheses, H.: u = 47.6 and H.: u < 47.6, where u represents the mean age of teachers at Ravenwood High School.

The calculated p-value is 0.023, and we need to make a conclusion at a significance level of 0.10.

If we compare the p-value with the significance level, we see that the p-value is less than the significance level (0.023 < 0.10). This means that we have strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis H.: u = 47.6 in favor of the alternative hypothesis H.: u < 47.6.

Therefore, we can conclude that the mean age of teachers at Ravenwood High School is significantly less than 47.6 years at a significance level of 0.10.

Learn more about teachers here:

https://brainly.com/question/30614893

#SPJ11

Koel's new balance in his checking account is $845.99, which is option (a).

To find Koel's new balance in his checking account, we need to subtract the total amount of the checks he wrote on March 18 and add the amount of his deposit on March 19 to his balance on March 17.

Total amount of checks = $56.24 + $97.00 + $22.50 = $175.74

New balance = balance on March 17 - the total amount of checks + deposit

                      = $846.73 - $175.74 + $175.00

                      = $845.99

Therefore, Koel's new balance in his checking account is $845.99, which is an option (a).

Learn more about arithmetic addition and subtraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/29735725

#SPJ1

The option that would result in the highest overall cost for the employee is C. Option A has the highest overall cost by $32.50.

Option A:

Monthly premium = $75

Out-of-pocket cost for prescriptions = 0.2 × $1250

Total monthly cost = $75 + $250 = $325

Option B:

Monthly premium = $45

Out-of-pocket cost for first $600 in prescriptions = 25% × $600 = $150

Out-of-pocket cost for prescriptions over $600 = $97.50

Total monthly cost = $29250

he correct option is C.

Learn more about cost on

https://brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ1

Answer:

f = 11 2/7 (B)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 + f = 14 2/7

3+f-3 = 14 2/7 -3

f = 11 2/7

Thus, it's B.

Answer:

b) f = 11 2/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Now we have to,

→ Find the required value of f.

The equation is,

→ 3 + f = 14 2/7

Then the value of f will be,

→ 3 + f = 14 2/7

Converting mixed fraction to proper:

→ 3 + f = ((14 × 7) + 2)/7

→ 3 + f = (98 + 2)/7

→ 3 + f = 100/7

Subtract the Right hand side with 3:

→ f = (100/7) - 3

→ f = (100/7) - (21/7)

→ f = (100 - 21)/7

→ f = 79/7

Converting proper fraction to mixed:

→ f = (77 + 2)/7

→ f = (77/7) + (2/7)

→ [ f = 11 2/7 ]

Hence, the value of f is 11 2/7.

Answer:

The total gain is $212.44

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we need to calculate the total cost of purchasing 60 shares of stock:

60 shares * $61.83/share = $3,709.80

Next, we need to calculate the total amount received from selling the 60 shares:

$3,992.10

We need to subtract the brokerage fee, which is 1.75% of the total amount received: 0.0175 * $3,992.10 = $69.81

The total amount received after paying the brokerage fee is:

$3,992.10 - $69.81 = $3,922.29

The gain or loss is the difference between the total amount received and the total cost of purchasing the stock:

$3,922.29 - $3,709.80 = $212.49.

The expression using the properties of exponents will be  [tex]3( x^{2/3} y z ^{4/3})[/tex]

Noted that Exponentiation(the process of raising some number to some power) have some basic rules as:

[tex]^n\sqrt{a} = a^{1/n} \\\\(ab)^c = a^c \times b^c\\\\a^b = a^b \implies b= c \[/tex]

We are given that the expression as;

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27 x^2 y^3 z ^4} \\\\[/tex]

Solving the expression by the Exponentiation property;

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27 x^2 y^3 z ^4}[/tex]

[tex]3( x^{2/3} y z ^{4/3})[/tex]

Thus, the answer will be [tex]3( x^{2/3} y z ^{4/3})[/tex]

Learn more about exponentiation here:

https://brainly.com/question/26938318

#SPJ1