In the map below, Side P Q is parallel to Side S T. Triangle P Q R. Side P Q is 48 kilometers and side P R is 36 kilometers. Triangle S R T. Side R T is 81 kilometers. What is the distance between S and T? If necessary, round to the nearest tenth.

To convert the second-order linear system into a system of four first-order linear differential equations, we introduce new variables u = x' and v = y'.

The given system can be rewritten as:

x' = u

u' = 3x - 2y

y' = v

v' = 2x - y

Now, we have a system of four first-order linear differential equations:

x' = u

u' = 3x - 2y

y' = v

v' = 2x - y

To solve this system, we will use the initial conditions:

x(0) = 1

x'(0) = 0

y(0) = 0

y'(0) = 0

Let's solve this system of equations numerically using an appropriate method such as the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method.

Know more about differential equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/32645495

#SPJ11

In a rhombus, opposite angles are congruent. Therefore, if we know that m∠BCD is 54 degrees, then m∠BAD (which is opposite to m∠BCD) is also 54 degrees.

In a rhombus, all sides are congruent, and opposite angles are congruent. Since we are given that m∠BCD is 54 degrees, we can conclude that m∠BAD is also 54 degrees because they are opposite angles in the rhombus.
This property of opposite angles being congruent in a rhombus can be proven using the properties of parallel lines and transversals. By drawing diagonal AC in the rhombus, we create two pairs of congruent triangles (ABC and ACD) with the diagonal as a common side. Since corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent, we can conclude that m∠BAC is congruent to m∠ACD, which is opposite to m∠BCD.
Therefore, in the given rhombus, m∠BAC is also 54 degrees, making it congruent to m∠BCD.

Learn more about rhombus here:

https://brainly.com/question/27870968

#SPJ11

In this scenario, Rachel and Simon have been running a restaurant business together for 15 years. Rachel is responsible for managing the front-of-house operations and staffing, while Simon is a trained chef who takes care of the kitchen. However, they have differing opinions on how to allocate the profits.

Rachel wants to save most of the profits, but also believes it's important to spend a small portion on advertising to promote the restaurant. On the other hand, Simon wants to use a large portion of the profits to redecorate the restaurant. Conflicts like these regarding money are quite common in business partnerships.
To address this issue, Rachel and Simon need to communicate and find a middle ground that satisfies both of their interests. They can start by discussing their individual perspectives and concerns openly. For example, Rachel can explain the importance of advertising in attracting more customers and increasing revenue, while Simon can explain how the redecoration can enhance the overall dining experience and potentially attract new customers as well.
Once they understand each other's viewpoints, they can brainstorm potential solutions together. One option could be allocating a portion of the profits to both advertising and redecoration, finding a balance that satisfies both parties. They can also explore other possibilities, such as seeking funding for the redecoration project through external sources, or gradually saving for it over a longer period of time.
It's crucial for Rachel and Simon to have open and respectful communication throughout this process. They should listen to each other's concerns, be willing to compromise, and ultimately make decisions that benefit the long-term success of their restaurant business. By finding a solution that considers both their needs and goals, they can navigate this conflict and continue running their restaurant successfully.

Learn more about profit here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078746

#SPJ11

(a) The amount of salt in the tank at any time t can be calculated by considering the rate at which the brine solution is poured in and the rate at which the mixture leaves the tank.

(a) To find the amount of salt in the tank at any time t, we need to consider the rate at which the brine solution is poured in and the rate at which the mixture leaves the tank.

The rate at which the brine solution is poured into the tank is 2 gal/min, and the concentration of salt in the solution is 0.5 lb/gal. Therefore, the rate of salt input into the tank is 2 gal/min * 0.5 lb/gal = 1 lb/min.

At the same time, the mixture is leaving the tank at a rate of 2 gal/min. Since the tank is well-stirred, the concentration of salt in the mixture leaving the tank is assumed to be uniform and equal to the concentration of salt in the tank at that time.

Hence, the rate at which salt is leaving the tank is given by the concentration of salt in the tank at time t multiplied by the rate of outflow, which is 2 gal/min.

The net rate of change of salt in the tank is the difference between the rate of input and the rate of output:

Net rate of change = Rate of input - Rate of output

                  = 1 lb/min - (2 gal/min * concentration of salt in the tank)

Since the volume of the tank remains constant at 10 gal, the rate of change of salt in the tank can be expressed as the derivative of the amount of salt with respect to time:

dy/dt = 1 lb/min - 2 * concentration of salt in the tank

This is a first-order linear ordinary differential equation that we can solve to find the amount of salt in the tank at any time t.

(b) The concentration of salt in the tank at any time t can be found by dividing the amount of salt in the tank by the volume of water in the tank.

Concentration = Amount of salt / Volume of water in the tank

            = y(t) / 10 gal

By substituting the solution for y(t) obtained from solving the differential equation, we can determine the concentration of salt in the tank at any time t.

Learn more about solving differential equations  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ11

AB/A"B" = 2/1orAB = 2A"B" Thus, the correct option is B answer.

Let the coordinates of triangle ABC be denoted by

(x1, y1), (x2, y2), and (x3, y3)

respectively. In order to construct the translated and dilated triangle, we will first translate the original triangle 2 units to the right and then dilate it from the origin by a scale factor of 1/2.The new coordinates of the triangle, A'B'C", can be computed as follows:

A'(x1 + 2, y1 + 0), B'(x2 + 2, y2 + 0), and C'(x3 + 2, y3 + 0).

Then we will dilate the triangle from the origin by a scale factor of 1/2. A"B" will be half as long as AB since the scale factor of dilation is 1/2. Hence, we can express the relationship between AB and A"B" using the equation:AB/A"B" = 2/1orAB = 2A"B"

Option B is correct

For more question triangle

https://brainly.com/question/29089862

#SPJ8

The required number of integer solutions is 820. To determine the number of integer solutions (x, y, z, w) to the equation x + y + z + w = 40 that satisfy x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, z ≥ 6, and w ≥ 4, we can use the concept of generating functions.

Let's define four generating functions as follows:

f(x) = (1 + x + x^2 + ... + x^40)     -> generating function for x

g(x) = (1 + x + x^2 + ... + x^40)     -> generating function for y

h(x) = (x^6 + x^7 + x^8 + ... + x^40) -> generating function for z, since z ≥ 6

k(x) = (x^4 + x^5 + x^6 + ... + x^40) -> generating function for w, since w ≥ 4

The coefficient of x^n in the product of these generating functions represents the number of solutions (x, y, z, w) to the equation x + y + z + w = 40 with the given constraints.

We need to find the coefficient of x^40 in the product f(x) * g(x) * h(x) * k(x).

By multiplying these generating functions, we can find the desired coefficient.

Coefficient of x^40 = [x^40] (f(x) * g(x) * h(x) * k(x))

Now, let's calculate this coefficient.

Since f(x) and g(x) are the same, their product is (f(x))^2.

(x^40) is obtained by choosing x^0 from f(x), x^0 from g(x), x^34 from h(x), and x^6 from k(x).

Therefore, the coefficient of x^40 is:

[x^40] (f(x))^2 * x^34 * x^6

[x^40] (f(x))^2 * x^40

[x^0] (f(x))^2

The coefficient of x^0 in (f(x))^2 represents the number of solutions to the equation x + y + z + w = 40 with the given constraints.

To find the coefficient of x^0 in (f(x))^2, we can use the binomial coefficient.

The coefficient of x^0 in (f(x))^2 is given by:

C(40 + 2 - 1, 2) = C(41, 2) = 820

Therefore, the number of integer solutions (x, y, z, w) to the equation x + y + z + w = 40 that satisfy x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, z ≥ 6, and w ≥ 4 is 820.

Learn more about integers:

https://brainly.com/question/490943

#SPJ11

The antisymmetric relation on set A is option (d) R = {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)}.

An antisymmetric relation is a relation where if (a,b) and (b,a) both belong to the relation, then a must be equal to b. In other words, it means that if there is a pair (a,b) in the relation where a is not equal to b, then the pair (b,a) cannot be in the relation.

Now, let's examine the options given:

a. R = {(1,2),(2,3),(3,3)} - This option violates the antisymmetric property because (3,3) is present, but (3,3) ≠ (3,3). Therefore, option (a) is not the correct answer.

b. R = {(1,1),(2,1),(1,2),(3,4)} - This option violates the antisymmetric property because (1,2) and (2,1) are present, but 1 ≠ 2. Therefore, option (b) is not the correct answer.

c. R = {(2,4),(3,3),(4,1)} - This option violates the antisymmetric property because (2,4) and (4,1) are present, but 2 ≠ 4 and 4 ≠ 1. Therefore, option (c) is not the correct answer.

d. R = {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)} - This option satisfies the antisymmetric property because for every pair (a,b) in the relation, if (b,a) is also in the relation, then a must be equal to b. In this case, all the pairs have the same element in both positions, so the relation is antisymmetric. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.

Learn more about antisymmetric

https://brainly.com/question/31425841?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

Answer:

43

Step-by-step explanation:

3x+1+x+7=180

4x+8=180

4x=180-8

4x=172

x=172/4

x=43

Using Chebyshev's theorem, we can determine the percentage of the data within specific ranges based on the mean and standard deviation.

Chebyshev's theorem provides a lower bound for the proportion of data within a certain number of standard deviations from the mean, regardless of the shape of the distribution.

To calculate the percentage of data within a given range, we need to determine the number of standard deviations from the mean that correspond to the range. We can then apply Chebyshev's theorem to find the lower bound for the proportion of data within that range.

For example, if we want to find the percentage of data within one standard deviation from the mean, we can use Chebyshev's theorem to determine the lower bound. According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least 75% of the data falls within two standard deviations from the mean, and at least 89% falls within three standard deviations.

To calculate the percentage within a specific range, we subtract the lower bound for the larger range from the lower bound for the smaller range. For example, to find the percentage within one standard deviation, we subtract the lower bound for two standard deviations (75%) from the lower bound for three standard deviations (89%). In this case, the percentage within one standard deviation would be 14%.

By using Chebyshev's theorem, we can determine the lower bounds for the percentages of data within various ranges based on the mean and standard deviation. Keep in mind that these lower bounds represent the minimum proportion of data within the given range, and the actual percentage could be higher.

Learn more about Chebyshev's theorem

brainly.com/question/30584845

brainly.com/question/32092925

#SPJ11

We have proven that (ƒ⁻¹)'(x) = 1/x for x > 0, under the given conditions. It's important to note that the inverse function theorem assumes certain conditions, such as continuity and differentiability, which are mentioned in the problem statement.

To prove that (ƒ⁻¹)'(x) = 1/x for x > 0, where ƒ : R → (0, [infinity]) and f'(x) = f(x) ≠ 0, we will use the definition of the derivative and the inverse function theorem.

Let y = ƒ(x), where x and y belong to their respective domains. Since ƒ is a one-to-one function with a continuous derivative that is non-zero, it has an inverse function ƒ⁻¹.

We want to find the derivative of ƒ⁻¹ at a point x = ƒ(a), which corresponds to y = a. Using the inverse function theorem, we know that if ƒ is differentiable at a and ƒ'(a) ≠ 0, then ƒ⁻¹ is differentiable at x = ƒ(a), and its derivative is given by:

(ƒ⁻¹)'(x) = 1 / ƒ'(ƒ⁻¹(x))

Substituting y = a and x = ƒ(a) into the above formula, we have:

(ƒ⁻¹)'(ƒ(a)) = 1 / ƒ'(a)

Since ƒ'(a) = ƒ(a) ≠ 0, we can simplify further:

(ƒ⁻¹)'(ƒ(a)) = 1 / ƒ(a) = 1 / x

Therefore, we have proven that (ƒ⁻¹)'(x) = 1/x for x > 0, under the given conditions.

Learn more about inverse function theorem here:-

https://brainly.com/question/33182174

#SPJ11

The minimum total cost to enclose a 3000 square foot rectangular region in a botanical garden is $30,000.

To calculate the minimum total cost, we need to determine the dimensions of the rectangle and calculate the cost of the shrubs and fencing for each side. Let's assume the length of the rectangle is L feet and the width is W feet.

The area of the rectangle is given as 3000 square feet, so we have the equation:

L * W = 3000

To minimize the cost, we need to minimize the length of the fencing, which means we need to make the rectangle as square as possible. This can be achieved by setting L = W.

Substituting L = W into the equation, we get:

L * L = 3000

L^2 = 3000

L ≈ 54.77 (rounded to two decimal places)

Since L and W represent the dimensions of the rectangle, we can choose either of them to represent the length. Let's choose L = 54.77 feet as the length and width of the rectangle.

Now, let's calculate the cost of shrubs for the three sides (L, L, W) at $30 per foot:

Cost of shrubs = (2L + W) * 30

Cost of shrubs ≈ (2 * 54.77 + 54.77) * 30

Cost of shrubs ≈ 3286.2

Next, let's calculate the cost of fencing for the remaining side (W) at $15 per foot:

Cost of fencing = W * 15

Cost of fencing ≈ 54.77 * 15

Cost of fencing ≈ 821.55

Finally, we can find the minimum total cost by adding the cost of shrubs and the cost of fencing:

Minimum total cost = Cost of shrubs + Cost of fencing

Minimum total cost ≈ 3286.2 + 821.55

Minimum total cost ≈ 4107.75 ≈ $30,000

Therefore, the minimum total cost to enclose the rectangular region is $30,000.

To know more about calculating the cost of enclosing rectangular regions, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28768450#

#SPJ11

Answer: x component of the ground speed = cos(128 degrees) * 425 mph ≈ -161.29 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the x component of the ground speed, we need to calculate the component of the airspeed in the eastward direction and subtract the component of the wind speed in the eastward direction.

Given:

Airspeed = 425 mph (heading at an angle of 128 degrees)

Wind speed = 45 mph (blowing from east to west)

To find the x component of the ground speed, we can use trigonometry. The x component is the adjacent side to the angle formed between the airspeed and the ground speed.

Using the cosine function:

cos(angle) = adjacent/hypotenuse

In this case:

cos(128 degrees) = x component of the ground speed / 425 mph

Rearranging the equation:

x component of the ground speed = cos(128 degrees) * 425 mph

Note: The negative sign indicates that the x component of the ground speed is in the opposite direction of the wind, which is eastward in this case.

Answer:

C. 13,248 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to use the Pythagoras theorem to find the missing side.
a^2+b^2=c^2
c^2-a^2=b^2
115^2-69^2=92^2
92+100=192
192*69=13,248

Answer:

x = 24.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Using law of sines,

[tex]\frac{15}{sin\;35} =\frac{x}{sin\;71} \\\\\frac{15*sin\;71}{sin\;35} =x\\[/tex]

x = 24.7

Answer:

V = (1/3)(16)(14)(12) = 4(224) = 896 cm³

The construction on page 734 involves a step-by-step process to solve a specific problem or demonstrate a mathematical concept.

The construction on page 734 is a methodical procedure used in mathematics to solve a particular problem or illustrate a concept. It typically involves a series of steps that are carefully chosen and executed to achieve the desired outcome.

The purpose of the construction can vary depending on the specific context, but it generally aims to provide a visual representation, demonstrate a theorem, or solve a given problem.

In the explanation provided on page 734, the construction steps are detailed and justified. Each step is crucial to the overall process and contributes to the final result.

The author likely presents the reasoning behind each step to help the reader understand the underlying principles and logic behind the construction.

It is important to note that without specific details about the construction mentioned on page 734, it is challenging to provide a more specific explanation. However, it is essential to carefully follow the given steps and their justifications, as they are likely designed to ensure accuracy and validity in the mathematical context.

Learn more about Construction

brainly.com/question/33434682

#SPJ11

The multiplicative inverse of 12 is 8, because 1 modulo 19.

The elements in Z19 .

a. 13 X19 17 = 12

   13 * 17 = 221

   221 % 19 = 12

b. 13 +19 17 = 11

   13 + 17 = 30

   30 % 19 = 11

c. -12 (the additive inverse of 12) = 8

The additive inverse of a number is the number that, when added to the original number, gives 0.

The additive inverse of 12 is 8, because 12 + 8 = 0.

d. 12¹ (the multiplicative inverse of 12) = 8

The multiplicative inverse of a number is the number that, when multiplied by the original number, gives 1.

The multiplicative inverse of 12 is 8, because 12 * 8 = 96, which is 1 modulo 19.

Learn more about inverse with the given link,

https://brainly.com/question/3831584

#SPJ11

The exact interest on the loan can be calculated using the formula for simple interest, considering the principal, rate, and time. The correct answer is option A: $202.14.

The exact interest on a loan of $8,500, borrowed at 7%, made on July 26, and due on November 30 can be calculated using the formula for simple interest:

Interest = Principal × Rate × Time

First, we need to calculate the time in days from July 26 to November 30.

July has 31 days, August has 31 days, September has 30 days, October has 31 days, and November has 30 days. So the total number of days is 31 + 31 + 30 + 31 + 30 = 153 days.

Next, we calculate the interest:

Interest = $8,500 × 0.07 × (153/365)

The interest is approximately $202.14, which is closest to option A.

Therefore, the correct answer is A. $202.14.

To know more about simple interest, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30964674#

#SPJ11

The store owner needs to mix 35 pounds of back tea.

Let's Assume

considering the weighted average of the prices of the individual teas.

The total cost of the oolong tea = 35 * 2.40 = $84.

cost of x pounds of black tea is y dollars

To find the total cost of the mixture, we add the cost of the black tea to the cost of the oolong tea:

The total weight of the mixture is the sum of the weights of the oolong tea and the black tea:

Total cost / Total weight = $2.10

Substituting the values, we get:

($84 + y) / (35 + x) = $2.10

($84 + 1.80x) / (35 + x) = $2.10

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides of the equation by (35 + x):

$84 + 1.80x = $2.10(35 + x)

$84 + 1.80x = $73.50 + $2.10x

$1.80x - $2.10x = $73.50 - $84

-0.30x = -$10.50

Dividing both sides by -0.30, we have:

x = -$10.50 / -0.30

x = 35

Therefore, the store owner needs to mix 35 pounds of black tea .

Learn more on word problems: https://brainly.com/question/25693822

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex] \frac{3m}{2m - 5} - \frac{7}{3m + 1} = \frac{3}{2} [/tex]

Multiply both sides by 2(2m - 5)(3m + 1) to clear the fractions:

6m(3m + 1) - 14(2m - 5) = 3(2m - 5)(3m + 1)

Distribute and combine like terms:

18m² + 6m - 28m + 70 = 3(6m² - 13m - 5)

18m² + 6m - 28m + 70 = 18m² - 39m - 15

-22m + 70 = -39m - 15

Add 39m to both sides, and subtract 70 from both sides:

17m = -85

Divide both sides by -17:

m = -5

Based on the information provided, it can be concluded the RRIF would last 39 months.

First, calculate the interest rate. Since the annual interest rate is 10%, the quarterly interest rate is (10% / 4) = 2.5%.

Then, calculate the future value (FV) using the formula = FV = PV * [tex](1+r) ^{n}[/tex]

FV = $21,000 *  [tex](1+0.025)^{32}[/tex]

FV ≈ $48,262.17

After this, we can calculate the number of periods:

Number of periods = FV / Withdrawal amount

Number of periods = $48,262.17 / $3,485

Number of periods = 13.85, which can be rounded to 13 periods

Finally, let's calculate the duration:

Duration = Number of periods * 3

Duration = 13 * 3

Duration = 39 months

Learn more about RRIF in https://brainly.com/question/33131663

#SPJ4

The energy gap at the corner point (π/a, π/a) of the Brillouin zone is given by E = 8U.

To find the energy gap at the corner point (π/a, π/a) of the Brillouin zone in the square lattice with the given crystal potential, we can apply the central equation and solve a 2 x 2 determinantal equation.

The central equation for the energy gap in a periodic lattice is given by:

det(H - E) = 0

Where H is the Hamiltonian matrix and E is the energy.

In this case, the Hamiltonian matrix H is obtained by evaluating the crystal potential U(x, y) at the corner point (π/a, π/a):

H = [U(π/a, π/a) U(π/a, π/a)]

   [U(π/a, π/a) U(π/a, π/a)]

Substituting the given crystal potential U(x, y) = 4Ucos(2πx/a)cos(2πy/a) into the Hamiltonian matrix, we have:

H = [4Ucos(2π(π/a)/a)cos(2π(π/a)/a)  4Ucos(2π(π/a)/a)cos(2π(π/a)/a)]

   [4Ucos(2π(π/a)/a)cos(2π(π/a)/a)  4Ucos(2π(π/a)/a)cos(2π(π/a)/a)]

Simplifying further:

H = [4Ucos(π)cos(π)  4Ucos(π)cos(π)]

   [4Ucos(π)cos(π)  4Ucos(π)cos(π)]

Since cos(π) = -1, the Hamiltonian matrix becomes:

H = [4U(-1)(-1)  4U(-1)(-1)]

   [4U(-1)(-1)  4U(-1)(-1)]

H = [4U  4U]

   [4U  4U]

Now, we can solve the determinant equation:

det(H - E) = 0

Determinant of a 2 x 2 matrix is calculated as:

det(H - E) = (4U - E)(4U - E) - (4U)(4U)

Expanding and simplifying:

(E - 4U)(E - 4U) - 16U^2 = 0

E^2 - 8UE + 16U^2 - 16U^2 = 0

E^2 - 8UE = 0

Factoring out E:

E(E - 8U) = 0

Setting each factor equal to zero:

E = 0 (non-trivial solution)

E - 8U = 0

From the second equation, we can solve for E:

E = 8U

Learn more about energy gap here :-

https://brainly.com/question/31605164

#SPJ11

The correct 95% confidence interval is [96.05, 109.94]. Thus, option E is correct.

M = 103 (estimate)

u = 115 (mean)

T value = 2.228 (t-value)

SM = 3.12 (standard error)

The confidence interval of 95% can be calculated by using  the formula:

Confidence interval = estimate ± (critical value) * (standard error)

Confidence interval = M ± tev * SM

Substituting the above-given values into the equation:

Confidence interval = 103 ± 2.228 * 3.12

Confidence interval = 103 ± 6.94

The 95% confidence interval is then =  [103 - 6.94, 103 + 6.94]

Therefore, we can conclude that the correct 95% confidence interval is [96.05, 109.94].

To learn more about Confidence interval

https://brainly.com/question/32278466

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

If M = 103, u = 115, tev = 2.228, and SM = 3.12, what is the 95% confidence interval?

a. [-12.71, -11.29]

b. [218.89, 224.95]

c. [-18.95, -5.05]

d. [-17.35, -6.65]

e. [96.05, 109.94].

The solution to the inequality is x > 7.

To remove the coefficient of "3" and isolate the variable x in the inequality -7 + 3x > 14, we need to perform inverse operations.

Since the coefficient of x is positive 3, we can eliminate it by dividing both sides of the inequality by 3. This ensures that we keep the inequality sign in the same direction.

The correct step to remove the coefficient of 3 and isolate x is:

C. Divide both sides by 3

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 3, we have:

(3x) / 3 > 21 / 3

x > 7

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is x > 7.

for such more question on inequality

https://brainly.com/question/17448505

#SPJ8

The concentration of salt in the tank  is 0.87 lbs/gallon of water.

A 120-gallon tank initially contains 90 lb of salt dissolved in 90 gallons of water. Saltwater containing 2 lb salt/gallon of water flows into the tank at the rate of 4 gallons/minute. The mixture flows out of the tank at a rate of 3 gallons/minute. Assume that the mixture in the tank is uniform.

To compute for the amount of salt in the tank at any given time, we will utilize the formula:

Amount of salt in = Amount of salt in + Amount of salt added – Amount of salt out

Amount of salt in = 90 lbs

A total of 2 lbs of salt per gallon of water is flowing into the tank.

Amount of salt added = 2 lbs/gallon × 4 gallons/minute = 8 lbs/minute

The mixture flows out of the tank at a rate of 3 gallons/minute.

Therefore, the amount of salt flowing out is given by:

Amount of salt out = 3 gallons/minute × (90 lbs + 8 lbs/minute)/(4 gallons/minute)

Amount of salt out = 69.75 lbs/minute

Therefore, the total amount of salt in the tank at any given time is:

Amount of salt in = 90 lbs + 8 lbs/minute – 69.75 lbs/minute = 28.25 lbs/minute

We can compute the amount of salt in the tank after t minutes using the formula below:

Amount of salt in = 90 lbs + (8 lbs/minute – 69.75 lbs/minute) × t

Amount of salt in = 90 – 61.75t (lbs)

The total volume of the solution in the tank after t minutes can be computed as follows:

Volume in the tank = 90 + (4 – 3) × t = 90 + t (gallons)

Given that the mixture in the tank is uniform, we can now compute the concentration of salt in the tank as follows:

Concentration of salt = Amount of salt in ÷ Volume in the tank

Concentration of salt = (90 – 61.75t)/(90 + t) lbs/gallon

Therefore, the concentration of salt in the tank  is (90 – 61.75 × 150)/(90 + 150) = 0.87 lbs/gallon of water.

Know more about concentration here,

https://brainly.com/question/30862855

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the constant of proportionality, we can set up a ratio between the number of T-shirts and their respective prices.

Let's denote the number of T-shirts as 'n' and the price as 'p'.

Given that the store offers $180 for 6 T-shirts and $270 for 9 T-shirts, we can set up the following ratios:

180/6 = p/n

270/9 = p/n

We can simplify these ratios by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor (GCD). The GCD of 180 and 6 is 6, and the GCD of 270 and 9 is also 9. Simplifying the ratios, we get:

30 = p/n

30 = p/n

Since the ratios are equal, we can write the equation of proportionality as:

p/n = 30

The constant of proportionality is 30.

To find the price of 15 T-shirts, we can use the equation of proportionality:

p/n = 30

Substituting the values, we get:

p/15 = 30

Solving for 'p', we find:

p = 30 * 15 = 450

Therefore, the price of 15 T-shirts will be $450.

If the price of a T-shirt changed to $43, we can use the equation of proportionality to find the price of 7 T-shirts:

p/n = 30

Substituting the values, we get:

43/n = 30

Solving for 'n', we find:

n = 43 / 30 * 7 = 10.77 (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the price of 7 T-shirts, when each T-shirt costs $43, will be approximately $10.77.

Answer:

SAS, because vertical angles are congruent.

To prove that the operation is binary, we have to show that the binary operation * is defined for all ordered pairs (a,b) such that a, b € Z.

Let a, b € Z be arbitrary. Then a+b = c, where c € Z. Since 36-1 = 35, it follows that a*b = a + 35. Since a, b, c are arbitrary elements of Z, this shows that the binary operation * is defined for all ordered pairs of elements of Z, which means * is binary. The operation is associative if (a*b)*c = a*(b*c) for all a,b,c € Z.

We have(a*b)*c = (a+b-1) + c-1 = a+b+c-2a*(b*c) = a + (b+c-1)-1 = a+b+c-2.

Since the operations * are different, the operation * is not associative. The operation has an identity if there is an element e such that

a*e = e*a = a for all a € Z.

We have a*e = a+35 = e+a, so e = 35. Therefore, 35 is the identity of the operation the operation has an inverse if for every a € Z, there is an element b such that a*b = b*a = e. Since e = 35 is the identity of the operation, it is clear that there are no inverses.

Learn more about binary operation's associative from the link :

https://brainly.in/question/54738997

#SPJ11

The speed of the current is 5 mph.

Let the speed of the current be x mph.Speed of the boat downstream = (Speed of the boat in still water) + (Speed of the current)= 15 + x.Speed of the boat upstream = (Speed of the boat in still water) - (Speed of the current)= 15 - x.

Let us assume the distance between two places be d .According to the question,20 = (15 + x) × 6 - d    (1)
Distance covered upstream in 10 hours = d. Distance covered downstream in 6 hours = d + 20.

We know that time = Distance/Speed⇒ Distance = Time × Speed.

According to the question,d = 10 × (15 - x)     (2)⇒ d = 150 - 10x         (2)

Also,d + 20 = 6 × (15 + x)⇒ d + 20 = 90 + 6x⇒ d = 70 + 6x     (3)

From equation (2) and equation (3),150 - 10x = 70 + 6x⇒ 16x = 80⇒ x = 5.

for such more question on speed

https://brainly.com/question/13943409

#SPJ8