Investigation 2: Ezpass on I-66 Continued Transportation engineers determined that to help ease traffic, they would set up tolls for solo drivers during rush hour times on Route I-66 inside the Capital Beltway (I-495). Carpooling drivers with the proper Ezpass would drive free. The toll program began in December 4, 2017. To test the claim that fewer vehicles would use Route I-66 after the program began, a count of the number of vehicles were collected from two random samples. Both samples were taken on the first Monday of each month for an entire year before and after the toll program was implemented. The data set is called "Number of Vehicles 2" and we will use = 0.05 in this investigation.
a) Calculate the difference between the number of vehicles for the first Monday of each month using StatCrunch (go to Data  Compute  Expression). Please subtract (2018 – 2017). List the difference for each of the pairs in one column in your solutions document.
b) Obtain the sample mean of these differences and the sample standard deviation of these differences using StatCrunch. Copy the table that you obtain from StatCrunch into your solutions document and round the values for the sample mean and sample standard deviation to two decimal places.
c) Define the population parameter in context in one sentence.
d) State the null and alternative hypotheses using correct notation.
e) Create a frequency histogram overlaid with a Normal curve of the sample differences and create a horizontal boxplot of the sample differences. Title and label each graph appropriately and copy these graphs into your solutions.
f) Provide a one-sentence comment about these graphs that allow us to continue conducting inference using the t-distribution in this problem.
g) No matter your answer to part (f), calculate the test statistic "by hand" and be sure to show your work (please type this work). Use the rounded values you obtained in part (b). Round the test statistic to three decimal places.
h) State the degrees of freedom for this test and show how you calculated the degrees of freedom.
i) Calculate the p-value using the T-calculator in StatCrunch (Stat  Calculators  T). Present the T-Calculator image in your solutions document.
j) Use StatCrunch Stat  T Stats  Paired and enter "2018" for Sample 1 and "2017" for Sample 2 to verify your test statistic from part (g) and your p-value in part (i). Copy the output into your solutions document.
k) State your decision whether you reject or do not reject the null hypothesis and the reason for your decision in one sentence.
l) State your conclusion in context of the problem in one or two complete sentences.
m) Compare the standard error from the StatCrunch output in part (j) to the standard error obtained in part (h) of Investigation 1. How did the different study designs affect the outcome of each hypothesis test? Answer these in two or three sentences.
Given Data from Stat Crunch:
Month: 2017: 2018:
January
22715 23545
February 22568 21662
March 24877 21943
April 30010 26610
May 32745 29105
June 31844 30805
July 32343 29374
August 30641 26819
September 25042 29172
October 31620 25053
November 27898 20347
December 23169 26319

The right option is (a) 0.8633. the probability that the sample proportion will be between 0.9115 and 0.946

is: P(0.9115 < sample proportion < 0.946) = P(0.932 < z < 1.457) = 0.9265 - 0.8212 = 0.1053 We can use the Central Limit Theorem to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample proportion. Since the sample size is large (n=51),

we can assume that the sampling distribution is approximately normal with mean = population proportion = 0.85 and standard deviation = sqrt[(p*(1-p))/n] = sqrt[(0.85*0.15)/51] = 0.0661.

Then, we standardize the sample proportion values to z-scores using the formula: z = (sample proportion - population proportion) / standard deviation

z1 = (0.9115 - 0.85) / 0.0661 = 0.932

z2 = (0.946 - 0.85) / 0.0661 = 1.457

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the probabilities associated with these z-scores P(z < 0.932) = 0.8212

P(z < 1.457) = 0.9265

Therefore, the probability that the sample proportion will be between 0.9115 and 0.946 is:

P(0.9115 < sample proportion < 0.946) = P(0.932 < z < 1.457) = 0.9265 - 0.8212 = 0.1053

Alternatively, we can use a calculator or software to directly find the probability of the sample proportion falling within the given range. For example, using the normalcdf function in or Sheets, we get:

normalcdf(0.9115, 0.946, 0.85, 0.0661) = 0.8633, This confirms that the answer is (a) 0.8633.

To know more about probability click here

brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

The function f(t) = Bt / (1 + At^2) to have a critical point at (4, 1), the values of A and B must be A = 1/8 and B = 2. For the function y(t) = at^tln(t) to find the t-intercept in terms of a, we set y(t) = 0 and solve for t. The critical point of y(t) is at t = 1, and it is neither a local maximum nor minimum.

To find the values of A and B for f(t) = Bt / (1 + At^2) to have a critical point at (4, 1), we differentiate f(t) with respect to t and set it equal to zero. Taking the derivative, we have (1 + At^2) * B - Bt * 2At = 0. Simplifying and substituting the values (4, 1), we obtain the equations 16A - 32B = 0 and 1 + 16A = B. Solving these equations simultaneously, we find A = 1/8 and     B = 2.

For y(t) = at^tln(t), to find the t-intercept, we set y(t) equal to zero and solve for t. Setting at^tln(t) = 0, we know that either a = 0 or t = 1. However, for t > 0, we exclude t = 0. Thus, the t-intercept is t = 1.

To determine the critical point of y(t) = at^tln(t), we take the derivative and set it equal to zero. Differentiating y(t), we get y'(t) = at^tln(t) + at^(t-1)(1 + ln(t)). Setting y'(t) equal to zero, we find that at^tln(t) + at^(t-1)(1 + ln(t)) = 0. The critical point occurs at t = 1. To determine if it is a local maximum or minimum, we examine the second derivative.

The second derivative y''(t) = at^(t-1)(ln(t))^2 + 2a(t^(t-1)ln(t) - t^(t-1) + t^(t-1)/t). At t = 1, y''(1) = a(0)^2 + 2a(0 - 1 + 1) = 0. Since the second derivative is zero, the nature of the critical point cannot be determined from this information, so it is neither a local maximum nor minimum.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

To find the distance from the vertex of the parabolic cross section to the focus, we can use the formula for a parabolic equation:

y = a(x-h)^2 + k,

where (h, k) is the vertex of the parabola and a is a constant that determines the shape of the parabola.

Given that the parabolic cross section is 6 ft wide at the opening and 2.5 ft deep at the vertex, we can determine the values of a, h, and k.

The width of the opening is 6 ft, which means that when x = 3 ft (half of the opening width), y = 0 ft. This gives us one point on the parabola: (3, 0).

The depth at the vertex is 2.5 ft, so the vertex is (0, -2.5).

Plugging these values into the parabolic equation, we have:

0 = a(3-0)^2 - 2.5,

0 = 9a - 2.5.

Solving for a, we get a = 2.5/9.

Now we can find the distance from the vertex to the focus using the formula:

f = a/4,

where f is the distance from the vertex to the focus.

Substituting the value of a, we have:

f = (2.5/9)/4,

f = 2.5/36,

f ≈ 0.0694 ft.

Rounding to two decimal places, the distance from the vertex to the focus is approximately 0.07 ft.

Therefore, the correct answer is not among the options provided.

Learn more about parabolic equation here: brainly.com/question/12703381

#SPJ11

The critical region for the most powerful test is (y ≥ (θ₀/θₐ) * (c - ln(θ₀ / θₐ)) * (θ₀ / (θ₀ - θₐ))). But the test derived is not uniformly most powerful for testing H₀: θ = θ₀ against Hₐ: θ < θ₀.

To derive the most powerful test for testing the null hypothesis H₀: θ = θ₀ against the alternative hypothesis Hₐ: θ = θₐ, where θₐ < θ₀, in the exponential distribution with mean θ, we can use the Neyman-Pearson lemma. The exponential distribution has the probability density function:

f(y; θ) = (1/θ) * exp(-y/θ), y ≥ 0

where θ is the mean parameter.

a. Derivation of the most powerful test:

We want to find a test statistic that maximizes the likelihood ratio for this hypothesis testing problem. The likelihood ratio is given by:

LR(y) = (L(θₐ) / L(θ₀)) = [(1/θₐ) * exp(-y/θₐ)] / [(1/θ₀) * exp(-y/θ₀)]

Simplifying the likelihood ratio, we have:

LR(y) = (θ₀ / θₐ) * exp((θ₀ - θₐ) * y/θ₀)

To obtain the most powerful test, we need to find the critical region that maximizes the likelihood ratio. Taking the logarithm of the likelihood ratio, we have:

ln(LR(y)) = ln(θ₀ / θₐ) + ((θ₀ - θₐ) * y/θ₀)

Since the logarithm is a monotonically increasing function, we can equivalently maximize the logarithm of the likelihood ratio. The critical region for the most powerful test is determined by comparing this expression to a threshold value, which we denote as c:

ln(LR(y)) ≥ c

Simplifying the inequality, we have:

ln(θ₀ / θₐ) + ((θ₀ - θₐ) * y/θ₀) ≥ c

Rearranging the terms, we obtain the critical region for the most powerful test:

(y ≥ (θ₀/θₐ) * (c - ln(θ₀ / θₐ)) * (θ₀ / (θ₀ - θₐ)))

b. Uniformly most powerful test:

The test derived in part (a) is not uniformly most powerful for testing H₀: θ = θ₀ against Hₐ: θ < θ₀. The uniformly most powerful test would require the same critical region for all alternative values θₐ < θ₀. However, the critical region derived in part (a) depends on the specific value of θₐ, and thus it is not uniformly most powerful.

Learn more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/30821298

#SPJ11

Approximately 68% of the data falls within 1 standard deviation from the mean in a normal bell curve.

In a normal distribution, which follows a symmetric bell-shaped curve, the area under the curve represents the probability of occurrence of different values. The standard deviation measures the spread of the data around the mean. In a standard normal distribution (mean = 0, standard deviation = 1), approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean.

This can be understood by the empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule. According to this rule, approximately 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation of the mean. In other words, if the mean is represented by the center of the bell curve, then the interval from mean - 1 standard deviation to mean + 1 standard deviation encompasses about 68% of the data.

Learn more about normal bell curve here:-brainly.com/question/32199042

#SPJ11

The formula[tex]perimeter = 2 * sqrt(d1^2 + d2^2)[/tex] gives the perimeter of a rhombus in terms of its diagonals.

If you are given only the diagonals of a rhombus and you need to find its perimeter, you can use the following formula:

[tex]perimeter = 2 * square root( diagonal1^2 + diagonal2^2 )[/tex]

where diagonal1 and diagonal2 are the lengths of the two diagonals of the rhombus.

To see why this formula works, let's first recall some properties of a rhombus. A rhombus is a four-sided polygon with all sides equal in length. Its opposite sides are parallel and its diagonals bisect each other at right angles. Therefore, the diagonals of a rhombus divide it into four congruent right triangles.

Now, let's draw a rhombus and label its diagonals as d1 and d2:

      A

     / \

    /   \

 D /     \ B

  /   R   \

 /         \

/____d2_____\

C      d1     E

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the length of each side of the rhombus in terms of its diagonals:

AB = AE = (d1 / 2)   (since AB and AE are half of d1)

BC = CD = (d2 / 2)   (since BC and CD are half of d2)

Now, we can find the perimeter of the rhombus by adding up the lengths of its sides:

perimeter = AB + BC + CD + DE

         = (d1 / 2) + (d2 / 2) + (d2 / 2) + (d1 / 2)

         = d1 + d2

However, we can also express AB, BC, and CD in terms of d1 and d2, and use the Pythagorean theorem to simplify the expression:

AB = AE = sqrt((d1/2)^2 + (d2/2)^2)   (using the Pythagorean theorem)

BC = CD = AB   (since all sides of the rhombus are equal)

Substituting these expressions into the perimeter formula, we get:

perimeter = 2 * (AB + BC)

         = 2 * (sqrt((d1/2)^2 + (d2/2)^2) + AB)

         = 2 * sqrt((d1/2)^2 + (d2/2)^2 + AB^2)

         = 2 * sqrt((d1^2 + d2^2) / 4 + (d1^2 + d2^2) / 4)

         = 2 * sqrt(d1^2 + d2^2)

Therefore, the formula perimeter = 2 * sqrt(d1^2 + d2^2) gives the perimeter of a rhombus in terms of its diagonals.

Learn more about rhombus here:

https://brainly.com/question/27870968

#SPJ11

The height of the cylinder is [tex]3 inch[/tex]

Based on the attached figure,

Volume of the cylinder = 282.7 square inches

Radius of the cylinder =5 inches.

The height of the cylinder = ?

The volume of the cylinder  can be found with the formula as :

[tex]V=pi r^{2} h[/tex]

[tex]h=\frac{V}{pi r^{2} } \\\\h = \frac{282.7}{3.142 * 5^{2} } \\\\=3 inch[/tex]

Learn more about cylinder at:

https://brainly.com/question/9554871

#SPJ1

The vertices of A"B"C"D" are A"(-4, -3), B"(3, -2), C"(2, -7), and D"(-1, -8).

Given that, the coordinates are A(3, -4), B (0, -3), C(-1, -8), and D(-4,-9).

A. Given that, translated along the vector (7, 0).

The translation of vector A, B, C, and D along the vector (7, 0) will result in the points given by A'(10, -4), B'(7, -3), C'(6, -8), and D'(3, -9).

B. Given that, 90 degree counterclockwise rotation about (3, -2).

90 degree counterclockwise rotation about (3, -2) will result in the points given by A"(-4, -3), B"(3, -2), C"(2, -7), and D"(-1, -8).

Therefore, the vertices of A"B"C"D" are A"(-4, -3), B"(3, -2), C"(2, -7), and D"(-1, -8).

Learn more about the rotation here:

brainly.com/question/1571997.

#SPJ1

The correct answer is d. all of the above. All three types of van der Waals forces can be present in condensed phases, which include liquids and solids.

These forces are:

Hydrogen bonding: Hydrogen bonding occurs when a hydrogen atom is bonded to a highly electronegative atom (such as oxygen, nitrogen, or fluorine) and forms a weak bond with another electronegative atom in a neighboring molecule. This type of bonding is responsible for many unique properties of water and plays a significant role in the structures of biological molecules like proteins and DNA.

Dipole-dipole bonding: Dipole-dipole forces arise from the interaction between the positive end of one polar molecule and the negative end of another polar molecule. These forces contribute to the stability and physical properties of substances such as alcohol and acetone.

Dispersion forces: Dispersion forces, also known as London dispersion forces, are the weakest type of van der Waals forces. They result from temporary fluctuations in electron distribution, causing temporary dipoles in nonpolar molecules. Dispersion forces are present in all molecules, regardless of their polarity, and they become stronger with increasing molecular size.

In condensed phases, all three types of van der Waals forces can exist and contribute to the overall intermolecular interactions, influencing the properties and behavior of the substance.

Learn more about forces here:

https://brainly.com/question/26115859

#SPJ11

The value of k is 13.

Given that y = 52 when x = 4,

If the value of y varies directly with x, it means that y and x are proportional to each other.

Mathematically, this can be represented as y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality.

we can substitute these values into the equation:

52 = k × 4

To solve for k, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation.

We can do this by dividing both sides of the equation by 4:

52/4 = k

Simplifying the left side gives us:

13 = k

Therefore, the value of k is 13.

Learn more about constant of proportionality click;

https://brainly.com/question/17793140

#SPJ1

(a) The general solution to the non-homogeneous equation y(x) = xy + xy' - y - 17 - 5 is y(x) = C₁x + C₂x² + C₃[tex]e^x[/tex] + 5x + 17, where C₁, C₂, and C₃ are arbitrary constants.

(b) The solution that satisfies the initial conditions y(1) = 2, y'(1) = 8, and y"(1) = 4 is y(x) = x + 3x² + 5[tex]e^x[/tex] + 5x + 17.

(a) To find the general solution to the non-homogeneous equation, we combine the particular solution Yp = -5inx - 2x + (xlnx)² with the fundamental solution set of the corresponding homogeneous equation, which is {x, xlnx, x(lnx)²}.

The general solution is given by y(x) = Yh + Yp, where Yh represents the linear combination of the fundamental solution set and Yp is the particular solution.

Therefore, the general solution is y(x) = C₁x + C₂x² + C₃[tex]e^x[/tex] + 5x + 17, where C₁, C₂, and C₃ are arbitrary constants.

(b) To find the solution that satisfies the initial conditions y(1) = 2, y'(1) = 8, and y"(1) = 4, we substitute these values into the general solution and solve for the constants.

By substituting the values into the equation y(x) = C₁x + C₂x² + C₃[tex]e^x[/tex]+ 5x + 17, we can find the specific values of C₁, C₂, and C₃.

After solving for the constants, we obtain the solution y(x) = x + 3x² + 5[tex]e^x[/tex] + 5x + 17, which satisfies the given initial conditions y(1) = 2, y'(1) = 8, and y"(1) = 4.

To learn more about non-homogeneous equation visit:

brainly.com/question/14349870

#SPJ11

The percentage of adults that Corinne scores higher than on the IQ test is 11.51%. So the answer is A. About 12%.

The z-score measures how many standard deviations an individual score is away from the mean in a normal distribution. By finding the z-score, we can determine the corresponding cumulative probability and interpret it as a percentage

To determine the percentage of adults that Corinne scores higher than on the IQ test, we need to find the area under the normal distribution curve to the right of her score.

Given that the mean is 100 and the standard deviation is 15, we can calculate the z-score for Corinne's score using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the individual score, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation.

Plugging in the values:

z = (118 - 100) / 15

z = 18 / 15

z = 1.2

Next, we need to find the cumulative probability to the right of the z-score using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

The cumulative probability represents the percentage of the population that scores below a certain point on the distribution.

Looking up the z-score of 1.2 in the standard normal distribution table, we find that the cumulative probability is approximately 0.8849.

Since we want to find the percentage of adults that Corinne scores higher than, we subtract the cumulative probability from 1:

=> 1 - 0.8849 = 0.1151

So, Corinne scores higher than approximately 11.51% of all adults.

Therefore,

The percentage of adults that Corinne scores higher than on the IQ test is 11.51%. So the answer is A. About 12%.

Learn more about Percentages at

https://brainly.com/question/15131163

#SPJ4

The solution to the ODE a) 2x2y’’ 3xy’ – y = 0  is y = a_0[tex]x^0[/tex] = a_0, where a_0 can be any constant value and  b) yy’’ = 2(y’)2 – 2y’ is y = constant and y = -x + C[tex]e^{2x}[/tex] + D.

a) To solve the ordinary differential equation (ODE) 2x²y'' + 3xy' - y = 0, we can use the method of power series expansion.

Assume a power series solution of the form y = Σ(a_nxⁿ), where a_n are coefficients to be determined. Differentiating y twice, we have y' = Σ(na_n[tex]x^{n-1}[/tex]) and y'' = Σ(n(n-1)a_n[tex]x^{n-2}[/tex]).

Substituting these expressions into the ODE and equating coefficients of like powers of x to zero, we obtain the following recurrence relation:

2(n(n-1)a_n + (n-1)na_(n-1))[tex]x^{n-2}[/tex] + 3na_n[tex]x^{n-1}[/tex] - a_nxⁿ = 0.

Simplifying the equation, we get:

2(n² - n + n - 1)a_n + 3na_n - a_n = 0.

This simplifies to:

2n²a_n = 0.

From this equation, we find that a_n = 0 for n > 0, except for a_0, which is an arbitrary constant. Hence, the solution to the ODE is y = a_0[tex]x^{0}[/tex] = a_0, where a_0 can be any constant value.

b) To solve the ODE yy'' = 2(y')² - 2y', we can use a substitution. Let's set v = y', then y'' = v'. Substituting these expressions into the ODE, we get v(v') = 2v² - 2v.

Rearranging the equation, we have v(v' - 2v + 2) = 0.

This equation gives us two cases:

Case 1: v = 0

If v = 0, then y' = 0, which implies that y is a constant function.

Case 2: v' - 2v + 2 = 0

This is a first-order linear homogeneous ODE. We can solve it using an integrating factor. The integrating factor is [tex]e^{\int\limits {-2} \, dx }[/tex] = [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex]

Multiplying the ODE by the integrating factor, we have [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex]v' - 2[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex]v + 2[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] = 0.

This equation can be rewritten as d/dx ([tex]e^{-2x}[/tex])v) = 2[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex].

Integrating both sides, we get v = -[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex]+ C, where C is an integration constant.

Dividing both sides by [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] , we have v = -1 + C[tex]e^{2x}[/tex].

Substituting v = y', we have y' = -1 + C[tex]e^{2x}[/tex]).

Integrating both sides, we obtain y = -x + C[tex]e^{2x}[/tex] + D, where C and D are constants.

The solutions to the ODE are y = constant and y = -x + C[tex]e^{2x}[/tex] + D.

Learn more about ordinary differential equation (ODE) here:

https://brainly.com/question/14469538

#SPJ11

Therefore, by mathematical induction, we have proven that f1^2+f2^2+...+fn^2=fn fn+1 for all n.


To prove that f1^2+f2^2+...+fn^2=fn fn+1, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case:
For n=1, we have f1^2 = f1*f2, which is true since f2 = 1.

Inductive step:
Assume that f1^2+f2^2+...+fn^2=fn fn+1 for some integer n.

We want to prove that f1^2+f2^2+...+fn^2+(n+1)^2 = fn+1 fn+2.

Using the definition of the Fibonacci sequence, we know that fn+1 = fn + fn-1 and fn+2 = fn+1 + fn.

Substituting these values, we get:

f1^2+f2^2+...+fn^2+(n+1)^2 = fn fn+1 + (fn+1)^2

= fn(fn+1+fn+1) + (fn+1)^2

= fn(fn+1+fn+2)

= fn fn+2

Learn more about mathematical induction here:-brainly.com/question/29503103

#SPJ11

In an exponential distribution with a mean lifetime of 7.6 years for light bulbs, 85% of all light bulbs will last at least 10.678 years. The correct option is OD.

The exponential distribution is commonly used to model the lifetimes of products, including light bulbs. The mean lifetime of 7.6 years indicates that, on average, a light bulb will burn out after 7.6 years. In an exponential distribution, the probability of a light bulb lasting at least a certain amount of time can be calculated using the cumulative distribution function (CDF).

To determine the time at which 85% of all light bulbs will last at least, we need to find the value at which the CDF equals 0.85. Using the exponential distribution formula, we can calculate this value. In this case, we need to find the time T such that P(X ≥ T) = 0.85, where X represents the lifetime of a light bulb.

Using the formula P(X ≥ T) = 1 - [tex]e^(-λT[/tex]), where λ is the rate parameter (λ = 1/mean lifetime), we can substitute the values to solve for T. In this case, λ = 1/7.6. By solving the equation 1 - [tex]e^(-λT[/tex]) = 0.85 for T, we find that T ≈ 10.678 years. Therefore, 85% of all light bulbs will last at least 10.678 years, corresponding to option OD .

Learn more about distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ11

In this scenario, an individual risk experiences one claim per year, and the amount of the claim follows an exponential distribution. The parameter t, which characterizes the exponential distribution, has a prior distribution. Given a claim of 5, we need to determine the posterior distribution for the parameter t.

To find the posterior distribution for the parameter t, we can use Bayesian inference. Bayes' theorem allows us to update our prior beliefs about the parameter t based on the observed claim of 5.

Bayes' theorem states that the posterior distribution is proportional to the product of the prior distribution and the likelihood function. The likelihood function represents the probability of observing the claim of 5 given a specific value of t.

By combining the prior distribution with the likelihood function, we can compute the unnormalized posterior distribution. To obtain the normalized posterior distribution, we divide the unnormalized posterior by its integral over all possible values of t.

The posterior distribution represents the updated beliefs about the parameter t given the observed claim of 5. It provides information about the most likely values of t based on the available data.

Learn more about exponential distribution here: brainly.com/question/30669822

#SPJ11

a and b are relatively prime to n.

What is the relatively prime?

According to number theory, two integers a and b are coprime, substantially prime, or mutually prime if only one positive integer, 1, can divide them equally. As a result, every prime integer that divides a does not divide b, and the opposite is also true. This translates to having a greatest common divisor of 1 for them.

Here, we have

Given: Suppose a,b,n ∈ Z with n>0. Suppose that ab ≡ 1(modn).

We have to prove that both a and b are relatively prime to n.

Let a, b ∈ Z and n ∈ Z⁺

Given ab ≡ 1(modn)

= n|ab - 1

∴k∈ Z ⇒ ab - 1 = nk

∴ ab - nk = 1

Let gcd(a,n) = d

⇒d|a and d|n

∴ For b, k ∈ Z ⇒ d | ab - nk

∴ d | 1⇒ d = 1

∴ gcd(a,n) = 1

Similarly, suppose gcd(b,n) = m

⇒m|b and m|n

∴ For a, k ∈ Z ⇒ m | ab - nk

∴ m | 1⇒ m = 1

∴ gcd(b,n) = 1

Hence, a and b are relatively prime to n.

To learn more about the relatively prime from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/15824403

#SPJ4

Answer:

-24/5

Step-by-step explanation:

which is bigger -24/5 or -11/2?

-24/5 = -4.8

-11/2 = -5.5

-5.5 < -4.8

So, -24/5 is bigger.

The probability of getting two science majors in a random survey of students is 840/8362 or approximately 0.1004. This probability was calculated using the multiplication rule of probability and assuming that each student selection is independent of the other.

The total number of students surveyed is 32 + 24 + 21 + 15 = 92. Therefore, the probability of selecting a science major on the first pick is 21/92. Since we are selecting two students, the probability of selecting another science major on the second pick is now 20/91. Therefore, the probability of getting two science majors is the product of these probabilities, which is (21/92) * (20/91) = 840/8362 or approximately 0.1004.
To answer the question in more than 100 words, it's important to understand the concept of probability. Probability is the measure of the likelihood of an event occurring. It ranges from 0 (impossible) to 1 (certain). In this scenario, we are trying to find the probability of selecting two science majors out of the total population of students surveyed.
We can calculate this probability by using the multiplication rule of probability. The multiplication rule states that the probability of two independent events occurring together is the product of their individual probabilities. In this case, we assume that the selection of each student is independent of the other.
We first calculate the probability of selecting a science major on the first pick. This is done by dividing the number of science majors (21) by the total number of students surveyed (92). Therefore, the probability of selecting a science major on the first pick is 21/92.
We then calculate the probability of selecting another science major on the second pick. Since we have already selected one science major, the probability of selecting another science major is now 20/91.
Finally, we multiply the probabilities of the two events to get the probability of both events occurring together. The result is 840/8362 or approximately 0.1004.
In summary, the probability of getting two science majors in a random survey of students is 840/8362 or approximately 0.1004. This probability was calculated using the multiplication rule of probability and assuming that each student selection is independent of the other.

To know more about probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/22983072

#SPJ11

Two orthogonal vectors in the plane x + y + 2z = 0 that are also orthonormal are:

[tex]v1 = (2/\sqrt(5), 0, -1/\sqrt(5))\\\\v2 = (-1/5, -2/5, 2/5)[/tex]

What is meant by orthogonal vector?

An orthogonal vector refers to a vector that is perpendicular, or at a right angle, to another vector.

To find two orthogonal vectors in the plane x + y + 2z = 0, we can start by finding one vector that lies in the plane. Then, we can find another vector that is orthogonal to the first vector.

Let's find one vector in the plane:

Assume x = 1, y = 0, then we can solve for z:

1 + 0 + 2z = 0

2z = -1

z = -1/2

So, one vector in the plane is (1, 0, -1/2).

To find another vector that is orthogonal to this vector, we can take the cross product of the given vector with any vector that is not parallel to it. Let's choose the vector (0, 1, 0):

(1, 0, -1/2) x (0, 1, 0) = (-1/2, -1, 1)

Now, we have two orthogonal vectors: (1, 0, -1/2) and (-1/2, -1, 1).

To make them orthonormal, we need to normalize these vectors by dividing each vector by its magnitude:

Normalize the first vector:

v1 = (1, 0, -1/2) / ||(1, 0, -1/2)||

Magnitude of (1, 0, -1/2):

[tex]||(1, 0, -1/2)|| = \sqrt(1^2 + 0^2 + (-1/2)^2) = \sqrt(1 + 0 + 1/4) = \sqrt(5/4) = \sqrt(5) / 2[/tex]

Normalize the first vector:

[tex]v1 = (1, 0, -1/2) / (\sqrt(5) / 2) = (2/\sqrt(5), 0, -1/\sqrt(5))[/tex]

Normalize the second vector:

v2 = (-1/2, -1, 1) / ||(-1/2, -1, 1)||

Magnitude of (-1/2, -1, 1):

[tex]||(-1/2, -1, 1)|| = \sqrt{((-1/2)^2 + (-1)^2 + 1^2)}\\\\ = \sqrt{(1/4 + 1 + 1)}\\\\ = \sqrt{(6 + 1/4)}\\\\ = \sqrt{(25/4)} \\\\= 5/2[/tex]

Normalize the second vector:

v2 = (-1/2, -1, 1) / (5/2) = (-1/5, -2/5, 2/5)

Therefore, two orthogonal vectors in the plane x + y + 2z = 0 that are also orthonormal are:

[tex]v1 = (2/\sqrt(5), 0, -1/\sqrt(5))\\\\v2 = (-1/5, -2/5, 2/5)[/tex]

To learn more about vector visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27854247

#SPJ4

The mark-up percentage is a popular business statistic used to assess a product's profitability. It denotes the proportion of profit made above the cost price. In this scenario, the mark-up percentage is of 200% implies that Josh made a hefty profit by selling the fountains.

To get the mark-up percentage, we must first establish the difference between the selling and cost prices and then represent it as a percentage of the cost price.

In this scenario, the fountain costs $86, and the selling price is $258. And the difference between the cost and the selling price is

$258 - $86 = $172.

The mark-up percentage is then calculated by dividing the difference by the cost price and multiplying by 100:

($172 / $86) * 100 = 200%.

The mark-up percentage is 200%. This indicates that Josh is charging 200% more than the cost price for the fountains. In other words, he makes a 200% profit on each fountains sold.

To know more about mark-up percentage

brainly.com/question/14318030

The origin of the dynamical system x_{k+1} = Ax_k is a saddle point. The direction of greatest attraction does not apply, and the direction of greatest repulsion is along the line through 0 and (1, 3).

To determine the nature of the origin as an attractor, repeller, or saddle point, we need to examine the eigenvalues of matrix A. Given the matrix A = [[-0.5, 0.6], [-3.6, 2.5]], we find its eigenvalues by solving the characteristic equation |A - λI| = 0, where λ represents the eigenvalues.

The characteristic equation becomes:

|-0.5 - λ 0.6 |

|-3.6 2.5 - λ| = 0

Expanding the determinant and solving for λ, we obtain the eigenvalues λ₁ = 0.5 and λ₂ = 2.

Since the eigenvalues have opposite signs, the origin is classified as a saddle point. A saddle point means that trajectories near the origin can approach or move away depending on the initial conditions.

Regarding the directions of greatest attraction and repulsion, in this case, the direction of greatest attraction does not apply. However, the direction of greatest repulsion is along the line passing through the origin (0, 0) and the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue 2, which is represented by the vector (1, 3). Therefore, the direction of greatest repulsion is along the line through 0 and (1, 3).


To learn more about eigenvector click here: brainly.com/question/31669528

#SPJ11

The given information about the person using a 3-month new member discount does not provide any direct insight into the probability of the person being a member for more than a year.

However, if we assume that the discount is only available to new members and that the probability of a person being a new member is equal to the probability of a person being a member for less than a year, then we can use the following formula to calculate the desired probability:

Probability (member for more than a year | using 3-month discount) = Probability (using 3-month discount | member for more than a year) * Probability (member for more than a year) / Probability (using 3-month discount)

Unfortunately, we do not have enough information to estimate the individual probabilities required for this calculation. Therefore, we cannot provide an exact answer to the question.    

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Therefore, the solution to the given differential equation is: y = -cos(x)(x + C), where C is the constant of integration.

To solve the differential equation using separation of variables, we will separate the variables and integrate.

e^(-y) sec(x) - dy/dx cos(x) = 0

Rearranging the equation:

e^(-y) sec(x) = dy/dx cos(x)

Divide both sides by e^(-y) sec(x) to isolate the variables:

dy/dx = cos(x) / (e^(-y) sec(x))

Now, we can separate the variables by multiplying both sides by dx:

dy / (cos(x) e^(-y)) = dx

Next, integrate both sides with respect to their respective variables:

∫ dy / (cos(x) e^(-y)) = ∫ dx

The integral of the left side can be simplified using substitution. Let u = e^(-y), then du = -e^(-y) dy:

∫ -du / (cos(x) u) = ∫ dx

Applying the integral:

ln|u| / cos(x) = x + C

Substituting back u = e^(-y):

ln|e^(-y)| / cos(x) = x + C

Using the property ln(e^a) = a, we have:

(-y) / cos(x) = x + C

Simplifying further:

y = -cos(x)(x + C)

To know more about differential equation,

https://brainly.com/question/31767641

#SPJ11

It would cost $2,890 less to be on payment plan B for 6 years than payment plan A. The Option D.

To get cost difference between payment plan B for 6 years and payment plan A, we will calculate the total cost for each option.

Payment option A:

Down payment: $2,450

Monthly payment: $175

Number of months: 36

The total cost for payment option A:

= Down payment + (Monthly payment * Number of months)

= $2,450 + ($175 * 36)

= $2,450 + $6,300

= $8,750

Payment option B:

Down payment: $1,900

Monthly payment: $165

Number of months: 24

The total cost for payment option B:

= Down payment + (Monthly payment * Number of months)

= $1,900 + ($165 * 24)

= $1,900 + $3,960

= $5,860

The cost difference:

= Total cost for payment plan B - Total cost for payment plan A

= $5,860 - $8,750

= -$2,890.

Read more about leasing

brainly.com/question/30237244

#SPJ1

The differential equation that has y4=Cx+3 as its general solution is:

The general solution of a differential equation is the set of all possible solutions that satisfy the equation. To find the differential equation that has a given general solution, we need to differentiate the general solution and see what differential equation it satisfies.


y'''' = 0
To find the differential equation that has y4=Cx+3 as its general solution, we need to differentiate y4=Cx+3 four times.
y4=Cx+3
Differentiate once: y'''=0
Differentiate twice: y''=0
Differentiate thrice: y'=0
Differentiate fourth time: y''''=0
Therefore, the differential equation that has y4=Cx+3 as its general solution is y''''=0.

To know more about derivatives visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The pair of variables that should produce a correlation near zero is number 4, driving distance and cost of gas for a group of commuting college students.  The correct option is 4.

This is because there is no clear relationship between these two variables.

Know more about the correlation

https://brainly.com/question/28175782

#SPJ11

Answer:

the rectangle

Step-by-step explanation:

the rectangle has more area than the parallelogram because you can fit the parallelogram into the rectangle because of the slants cut area

The statement "f(9) = 42.5" tells us that when x = 9, the numerator (x^2 + 4) of the function f is 42.5 times as large as the denominator (x - 7).

Given the function f(x) = x^2 + 4 / (x - 7), we are given the information that f(9) = 42.5. This means that when x = 9, the value of the function f is equal to 42.5.

To understand what this tells us about the numerator and denominator, we can substitute x = 9 into the function and solve for the numerator and denominator separately.

When x = 9, we have f(9) = (9^2 + 4) / (9 - 7) = 85 / 2 = 42.5.

This tells us that when x = 9, the numerator (x^2 + 4) is 42.5 times as large as the denominator (x - 7). Therefore, the correct choice is option a: "When x = 9, x^2 + 4 is 42.5 times as large as x - 7."

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11