Answer:
Explanation:
Judge Pollack used legal precedent as a way of knowing in making a decision. This corresponds to a legalistic way of thinking about the law.
Legal precedent refers to the principle that decisions made in previous similar cases should guide and influence the decisions made in current cases. Judges often rely on legal precedents to establish consistency and fairness in their rulings. In this scenario, Judge Pollack read a precedent that stated evidence must be fairly obtained to be admissible in court. By evaluating whether the confession in question was coerced and therefore unfairly obtained, Judge Pollack applied the legal precedent to determine the admissibility of the confession.
The legalistic way of thinking about the law emphasizes the importance of legal principles, rules, and precedents in interpreting and applying the law. It focuses on a systematic and consistent approach to legal decision-making, giving weight to established legal norms and principles.
