Let X and Y be independent random variables. Determine the distribution of (X−Y)/(X+Y) if (a) X,Y∈Exp(1), (b) X,Y∈N(0,1) (see also Problem 5.10.9(c)).

The dimension of the perimeter is 18.7 by 12.4 while the number of ticket sales must be atleast 3180

Let :

perimeter= 62 inches

Recall :

We have :

62 = 2(l + 2l/3)

62 = 2(5l/3)

62 = 10l/3

10l = 186

l = 186/10

l = 18.6

height = 2/3(18.6) = 12.4 inches

Hence, the dimension of the frame is 18.6 by 12.4 inches .

2.)

Let :

Amount to be charged = 820 + t/4

For amount to be charged to be atleast 1000

820 + t/4 ≥ 1000

solving the inequality

820 + t ≥ 4000

t ≥ 4000 - 820

t ≥ 3180

Hence, tickets sales must be atleast 3180

Learn more on inequality: https://brainly.com/question/25944814

#SPJ1

(a) The predicted birth weight when cigs = 0 is 119.77 ounces, while when cigs = 20 (one pack per day), the predicted birth weight is 129.97 ounces, indicating a difference of 10.2 ounces.

(b) No, this simple regression does not establish a causal relationship between birth weight and maternal smoking habits, as there could be other factors influencing both variables, leading to a spurious correlation.

(c) To predict a birth weight of 125 ounces, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy would need to be approximately 10.25, assuming the regression model accurately represents the relationship between the variables.

(a) The predicted birth weight when cigs = 0 can be calculated by substituting cigs = 0 into the regression equation: bwght^​=119.77+0.514(0) = 119.77 ounces. This means that for mothers who did not smoke during pregnancy, the predicted birth weight is 119.77 ounces.

When cigs = 20 (one pack per day), the predicted birth weight can be calculated as bwght^​=119.77+0.514(20) = 129.97 ounces. The difference between the predicted birth weights at cigs = 0 and cigs = 20 is 129.97 - 119.77 = 10.2 ounces.

(b) No, this simple regression does not necessarily capture a causal relationship between the child's birth weight and the mother's smoking habits. The regression coefficient of 0.514 indicates a positive association between the number of cigarettes smoked and birth weight, but it does not prove causality. There could be other confounding factors or variables that affect both smoking habits and birth weight, leading to a spurious correlation.

(c) To predict a birth weight of 125 ounces, we can rearrange the regression equation as follows: cigs = (125 - 119.77) / 0.514 ≈ 10.25. Therefore, to predict a birth weight of 125 ounces, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy would need to be approximately 10.25. However, it's important to note that this is based on the assumption that the regression model is appropriate and captures the relationship accurately.

Learn more about regression coefficient here:

https://brainly.com/question/30437943

#SPJ11

To find the z-scores for specific population values and determine a number with a given z-score, we can use the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where z is the z-score, x is the population value, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation.

a) To find the z-score for a population value of 3, we use the formula z = (x - μ) / σ. Substituting the values, we get z = (3 - 18) / 5 = -3. Therefore, the z-score for a population value of 3 is -3.

b) Similarly, for a population value of 13, the z-score is calculated as z = (13 - 18) / 5 = -1. Therefore, the z-score for a population value of 13 is -1.

c) To find the number that has a z-score of 2.2, we rearrange the formula to solve for x: x = μ + z * σ. Substituting the values, we get x = 18 + 2.2 * 5 = 29. Therefore, the number with a z-score of 2.2 is 29.

In summary, the z-score for a population value of 3 is -3, for a population value of 13 is -1, and a number with a z-score of 2.2 is 29.

learn more about standard deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

The z-score for an ACT score of 30 is approximately 2.31, indicating that it is 2.31 standard deviations above the mean. The z-score for a SAT score of 468 is approximately -0.36, indicating that it is 0.36 standard deviations below the mean.

The z-score, also known as the standard score, measures the distance of a data point from the mean in terms of standard deviations. It allows for the comparison of data points from different distributions by standardizing them. To calculate the z-score, we use the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where z is the z-score, x is the data point, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For part (a), we want to find the z-score for an ACT score of 30. Using the formula, we have:

[tex]z =\frac{(30 - 24.2)}{2.6}[/tex]≈ 2.31

This indicates that an ACT score of 30 is approximately 2.31 standard deviations above the mean.

For part (b), we want to find the z-score for a SAT score of 468. Using the formula, we have:

[tex]z =\frac{(468 - 510)}{110}[/tex] ≈ -0.36

This indicates that a SAT score of 468 is approximately 0.36 standard deviations below the mean.

In summary, the z-score for an ACT score of 30 is approximately 2.31, indicating it is above the mean, while the z-score for a SAT score of 468 is approximately -0.36, indicating it is below the mean.

Learn more about z-score here:

https://brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ11

The probability of an event occurring is expressed as a decimal fraction between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty.

A probability of 0.5 indicates that an event is equally likely to happen or not happen. A probability of less than 0.5 indicates that an event is unlikely to happen, whereas a probability of more than 0.5 indicates that an event is likely to happen.

In the given scenario, based on a report in a magazine, 26.2% of survey respondents have sleepwalked. Therefore, the probability of a survey respondent sleepwalking is 0.262 or 26.2/100. This implies that out of every 100 survey respondents, 26.2 have sleepwalked and the remaining 73.8 (100 - 26.2) have not sleepwalked.

The likelihood of an event is often expressed as a percentage, but it can also be expressed as a probability. For instance, if the probability of a disease affecting a certain population is 0.1, this implies that there is a 10% chance of an individual from that population developing the disease.

Similarly, if the probability of winning a lottery is 0.0001, this implies that there is a one in a hundred thousand chance of winning the lottery. Expressing likelihood as a probability allows for easier computation and comparison of probabilities.

It is important to note that probabilities do not indicate the certainty of an event occurring or not occurring, but rather the likelihood of it happening.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

3x = 5 will have one solution,

the solution is x = -5/3

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + 5 = 0

solving,

3x + 5 = 0,

3x = -5,

x = -5/3

Hence there is one solution

The largest value.Q1 = 21Q2 or median = 28Q3 = 33IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 33 - 21 = 12The outliers in the given data set are:78.

a. The data set is: 29, 35, 16, 78, 30, 32, 28, 15, 27, 24, 33, 31, 25, 74, 21, 26, 17, 34, 20, 23, 19. Minimum: 15,  Maximum: 78. The five-number summary is a collection of the data's center and dispersion.

It includes the smallest value, the first quartile (Q1), the median, the third quartile (Q3), and the largest value.Q1 = 21Q2 or median = 28Q3 = 33IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 33 - 21 = 12

b. The box-and-whisker plot for the data set can be drawn as shown below:c. Using the formula below, calculate the left and right limits for the outliers. Left limit = Q1 - 1.5(IQR)Right limit = Q3 + 1.5(IQR)Left limit = 21 - 1.5(12) = 3, Right limit = 33 + 1.5(12) = 51

d. An outlier is any value that falls outside of the range calculated in part c. The outliers in the given data set are:78.

Learn more about smallest value here:

https://brainly.com/question/32850130

#SPJ11

The coefficient of variation for set 1 is %.

coefficient of variation, we need the standard deviation (SD) and mean (µ) of each data set.

a) Set 1: SD1, µ1

b) Set 2: SD2, µ2

The coefficient of variation (CV) is given by the formula:

CV = (SD / µ) * 100%

the coefficient of variation for each data set, we divide the standard deviation by the mean and multiply by 100%.

Let's assume we have calculated the values for SD1, SD2, µ1, and µ2.

a) Set 1: CV1 = (SD1 / µ1) * 100%

b) Set 2: CV2 = (SD2 / µ2) * 100%

Substituting the respective values into these equations will yield the coefficient of variation for each data set.

To learn more about sample data

brainly.com/question/30529546

#SPJ11

The equation of the line perpendicular to 3x + 2y = 5 and passing through the point (0, -1) is y = (2/3)x - 1. To find the equation of a line perpendicular to a given line, we need to determine its slope and the point through which it passes.

In this case, we have a line with a given equation, and we want to find a line perpendicular to it passing through the point (0, -1).

First, let's find the slope of the given line. The given line equation is 3x + 2y = 5. We can rewrite it in slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) by isolating y: y = (-3/2)x + 5/2. Comparing this equation to y = mx + b, we see that the slope of the given line is -3/2.

Since the line we want to find is perpendicular to the given line, its slope will be the negative reciprocal of -3/2. The negative reciprocal of -3/2 is 2/3.

Now we have the slope (m = 2/3) and the point (0, -1) through which the line passes. We can use the point-slope form of a line (y - y1 = m(x - x1)) to find the equation of the perpendicular line. Substituting the values, we get:

y - (-1) = (2/3)(x - 0)

y + 1 = (2/3)x

Simplifying, we obtain:

y = (2/3)x - 1

Therefore, the equation of the line perpendicular to 3x + 2y = 5 and passing through the point (0, -1) is y = (2/3)x - 1.

Learn more about slope here:

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ11

7) The statement "The intersection of any two intervals is an interval" is true. When two intervals intersect, the resulting set contains all the elements that are common to both intervals. This set can be represented as a new interval that includes all the common elements.

8) The statement "The empty set ∅ is an interval in R" is false. An interval is defined as a set of real numbers that includes all the numbers between two endpoints. The empty set, which contains no elements, does not satisfy this definition as it does not have any endpoints or a range of values.

9) The statement "The Well Ordering Property states that every nonempty subset of N has a least element" is true. The Well Ordering Property is a fundamental property of the set of natural numbers (N). It states that any nonempty subset of N has a least element, meaning that there is always a smallest element in any nonempty set of natural numbers. This property is essential in proofs and reasoning involving the natural numbers.

To learn more about real numbers; - brainly.com/question/31715634

#SPJ11

The height of the pyramid is approximately 348 feet (rounded). This is determined by using trigonometric principles and solving a system of equations derived from the given angles of elevation.

To find the height of the pyramid, we set up two right triangles with the height of the pyramid as the unknown variable 'h' in both cases. By applying the tangent function to the given angles of elevation, we can establish equations relating 'h' to the distances from the points on the ground to the pyramid.

By solving the system of equations, we find that the height of the pyramid is approximately 348 feet. In the first scenario, the angle of elevation of 36°20′ provides the initial equation, and in the second scenario, the angle of elevation of 31°10′ with a distance increased by 156 feet gives the second equation.

By rearranging and manipulating these equations, we arrive at a final expression for 'h'. Evaluating this expression using the given angle values, we obtain the height of the pyramid as approximately 348 feet.

Learn more about trigonometric principles here:

https://brainly.com/question/29019939

#SPJ11

a) P(X=2) = 0  ,  b) P(-1 < X < 0) = 0  and  d) To find σ^2, integrate (x - μ)^2 * f(x). Verify variance is non-negative and reasonable.



a) To determine P(X=2), we evaluate the probability density function (PDF) at x=2:f(2) = 3/2 - (9/2) * 2 = 3/2 - 9 = -12/2 = -6However, the probability density function should be non-negative, so P(X=2) is equal to zero.

b) To determine P(-1 < X < 0), we need to integrate the PDF from -1 to 0:

P(-1 < X < 0) = ∫[from -1 to 0] f(x) dx = ∫[from -1 to 0] 0 dx = 0Since the PDF is zero in the interval [-1, 0], the probability of X falling in that interval is also zero.

d) To find the variance of X, we use the formula:σ^2 = E[(X - μ)^2]where μ is the mean of X and E[ ] denotes the expected value.The expected value E[X] is given by:E[X] = ∫[from -∞ to ∞] x * f(x) dxTo calculate the expected value, we need to integrate x * f(x) over the entire range of x.The final answer for the variance can be obtained by evaluating the integral:

σ^2 = ∫[from -∞ to ∞] (x - μ)^2 * f(x) dx

The common sense check of the final answer involves ensuring that the variance is non-negative and reasonable in the context of the problem.

To learn more about integrate click here

brainly.com/question/32510822

#SPJ11

We can conclude that as n tends to infinity,[tex]y_n[/tex] approaches 0 in probability (y_n → p 0), since the probability of [tex]y_n[/tex] being equal to 0 approaches 1.

To show that [tex]y_n[/tex]→ 0 as n approaches infinity, we need to prove that the probability of [tex]y_n[/tex] being equal to 0 approaches 1 as n becomes larger.

Let's analyze the probabilities of [tex]y_n:[/tex]

For n = 1:

The probability of [tex]y_1[/tex] being equal to 0 is 1 -[tex](1-1)^(-1) = 1 - 0^(-1) = 1.[/tex]

For n > 1:

The probability of [tex]y_n[/tex] being equal to 0 is 1 - [tex](n-1)^(-1).[/tex]

As n approaches infinity, the term [tex](n-1)^(-1)[/tex] approaches 0, which means the probability of y_n being equal to 0 approaches 1.

Therefore, we can conclude that as n tends to infinity, [tex]y_n[/tex]  approaches 0 in probability ([tex]y_n[/tex]→ p 0), since the probability of[tex]y_n[/tex] being equal to 0 approaches 1.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

(a) sin(α) = √2/2, cos(α) = √2/2, tan(α) = 1; (b) sin(α) = 0, cos(α) = -1, tan(α) = 0; (c) sin(α) = 7/√53, cos(α) = 2/√53, tan(α) = 7/2; (d) sin(α) = -1, cos(α) = 0, tan(α) is undefined.

(a) For the point (3, 3), we can calculate the trigonometric functions as follows:

The distance from the origin to the point (3, 3) is given by r = √(3[tex]^2[/tex] + 3[tex]^2[/tex]) = √18 = 3√2.

Since x = 3 and y = 3, we can determine the trigonometric functions:

sin(α) = y/r = 3/3√2 = √2/2

cos(α) = x/r = 3/3√2 = √2/2

tan(α) = y/x = 3/3 = 1

Therefore, sin(α) = √2/2, cos(α) = √2/2, and tan(α) = 1.

(b) For the point (-2, 0):

The distance from the origin to the point (-2, 0) is given by r = √((-2)[tex]^2[/tex] + 0[tex]^2[/tex]) = 2.

Since x = -2 and y = 0:

sin(α) = y/r = 0/2 = 0

cos(α) = x/r = -2/2 = -1

tan(α) = y/x = 0/-2 = 0

Therefore, sin(α) = 0, cos(α) = -1, and tan(α) = 0.

(c) For the point (2, 7):

The distance from the origin to the point (2, 7) is given by r = √(2[tex]^2[/tex] + 7[tex]^2[/tex]) = √53.

Since x = 2 and y = 7:

sin(α) = y/r = 7/√53

cos(α) = x/r = 2/√53

tan(α) = y/x = 7/2

Therefore, sin(α) = 7/√53, cos(α) = 2/√53, and tan(α) = 7/2.

(d) For the point (0, -1):

The distance from the origin to the point (0, -1) is given by r = √(0[tex]^2[/tex] + (-1)[tex]^2[/tex]) = 1.

Since x = 0 and y = -1:

sin(α) = y/r = -1/1 = -1

cos(α) = x/r = 0/1 = 0

tan(α) = y/x = -1/0 (undefined)

Therefore, sin(α) = -1, cos(α) = 0, and tan(α) is undefined.

Learn more about tan

brainly.com/question/14347166

#SPJ11

To determine if there is a difference in heart rate between a control group and an experimental group, an independent t-test can be done.

To do this test between the control group and the experimental group, we can take the mean of heart rate of the two groups and if there is a significant difference in their means, it is sure that there is a difference. It depends on our hypothesis.

Various assumptions have to be taken into account like the two groups are independent, normally distributed, variances should be the same etc. Independent means the two groups should be unrelated.

To make sure our calculation is right we have to ensure that our sample size is large and have to take them as random as possible. We may have to change the significance level for our test considering all factors. Mostly we use a significance level of 5 per cent. The test also depends on the assumptions and the study design we are using.

To know more about t-tests,

https://brainly.com/question/8206980

Larry borrowed $17,800 from Moe at an effective interest rate of 8.7%. He has agreed to make 12 equal annual payments starting one year from now to repay the loan.

Larry's loan from Moe involves borrowing $17,800 at an effective interest rate of 8.7%. This means that Larry will have to pay interest on the outstanding loan balance each year. To repay the loan, Larry has agreed to make 12 equal annual payments, starting one year from now. Each payment will include both a portion to repay the principal amount borrowed and the interest accrued. These equal payments over 12 years will allow Larry to gradually pay off the loan, ensuring that the debt is fully repaid by the end of the repayment period. The specific amount of each payment will depend on the terms of the loan and the interest calculation method used.

Learn mpore about Loans and Repayment:

brainly.com/question/30281186

#SPJ11

The total variation distance between P=Ber(p) and Q=Poiss(p), where p∈(0,1), is 2(1 - √(1 - p)).

The total variation distance measures the difference between two probability distributions. In this case, we have two distributions: P, which represents a Bernoulli distribution with parameter p, and Q, which represents a Poisson distribution with parameter p. The total variation distance between P and Q is given by the formula 2(1 - √(1 - p)).

To understand this formula, let's break it down. The term (1 - p) represents the probability of success in the Bernoulli distribution, where p is the parameter. When we take the square root of (1 - p), we get the probability of failure in the Bernoulli distribution. This is because the sum of the probabilities of success and failure in a Bernoulli distribution must equal 1.

By subtracting √(1 - p) from 1, we obtain the probability of success in the complementary event of the Bernoulli distribution. This is equivalent to the parameter of the Poisson distribution, which represents the average number of events in a given interval.

Finally, multiplying the result by 2 gives us the total variation distance. The total variation distance ranges from 0 to 2, where a value of 0 indicates that the two distributions are identical, and a value of 2 indicates that they are completely different.

In summary, the formula 2(1 - √(1 - p)) provides a concise and explicit expression for the total variation distance between a Bernoulli distribution and a Poisson distribution with the same parameter p.

Learn more about variation

brainly.com/question/17287798

#SPJ11

There are 1023 ways a person can toss a coin 11 times so that the number of tails is between 6 and 10 inclusive.

To determine the number of ways a person can toss a coin 11 times with the number of tails between 6 and 10 inclusive, we need to sum up the number of ways for each possible number of tails within that range.

Number of ways to get 6 tails:

This can be calculated using the binomial coefficient formula: C(n, k), where n is the total number of tosses (11) and k is the number of tails (6).

C(11, 6) = 462

Number of ways to get 7 tails:

C(11, 7) = 330

Number of ways to get 8 tails:

C(11, 8) = 165

Number of ways to get 9 tails:

C(11, 9) = 55

Number of ways to get 10 tails:

C(11, 10) = 11

To find the total number of ways, we sum up the individual counts:

462 + 330 + 165 + 55 + 11 = 1023

Therefore, there are 1023 ways a person can toss a coin 11 times so that the number of tails is between 6 and 10 inclusive.

To learn more about binomial coefficient click here:

brainly.com/question/32911189

#SPJ11

The number of students in the school is 1952.

To find the number of students in the school, we can use the concept of proportion.

Let's assume that the total number of students in the school is represented by the variable "x".

Given:

Proportion of students who voted = (3/4)

Total votes = 1464

According to the proportion, (3/4) of the total number of students voted, which can be written as:

(3/4) * x = 1464

To find the value of "x", we can multiply both sides of the equation by (4/3) to isolate "x":

x = (1464) * (4/3)

Simplifying the expression, we have:

x = 1952

Therefore, the number of students in the school is 1952.

Learn more about  number  from

https://brainly.com/question/27894163

#SPJ11

To find the value of 'a' in the equation (x^(4/3))^(6/5) = x^a, we can evaluate the left-hand side expression and simplify it.

Using the property of exponentiation, we can multiply the exponents when raising a power to another power. Applying this property to the given expression:

(x^(4/3))^(6/5) = x^((4/3)*(6/5))

To simplify, we multiply the exponents:

= x^(24/15)

Simplifying the fraction:

= x^(8/5)

Comparing this simplified expression to x^a, we can conclude that a = 8/5.

Learn more about Function

brainly.com/question/572693

#SPJ11

(a) Quadrant is II.

(b) Quadrant is III.

(a) For cos θ to be greater than 0, θ must lie in either the first or second quadrant of the unit circle, where cosine values are positive. However, since cscθ is specified to be less than 0 (negative), we can eliminate the first quadrant. In the second quadrant, both cos θ and cscθ can be positive, satisfying the given conditions. Therefore, the quadrant is II.

(b) For cscθ to be greater than 0, θ must lie in either the first or second quadrant of the unit circle, where cosecant values are positive. However, since sec θ is specified to be less than 0 (negative), we can eliminate the first quadrant. In the third quadrant, both cscθ and sec θ can be positive, satisfying the given conditions. Therefore, the quadrant is III.

In summary, to determine the quadrant based on the given conditions, we analyze the signs of the trigonometric ratios involved. For cos θ > 0, we look for quadrants where cosine values are positive (quadrants I and II). For cscθ < 0, we look for quadrants where cosecant values are negative (quadrants II and III). By considering both conditions together, we can narrow down the possible quadrants and determine the correct answer.

Learn more about Quadrant

brainly.com/question/26426112

#SPJ11

The angle between 0° and 360° that is coterminal with -1040° is 680°. The angle between 0 and 2π radians that is coterminal with -68π/9 radians is 68π/9 radians.

For the angle -1040°, we can add multiples of 360° to find a positive coterminal angle within the range of 0° to 360°:

-1040° + 360° = -680°

Since -680° is still negative, we can continue adding multiples of 360° until we obtain a positive angle:

-680° + 2(360°) = 680°

Therefore, the angle between 0° and 360° that is coterminal with -1040° is 680°.

Similarly, for the angle -68π/9 radians, we can add or subtract multiples of 2π radians to find a coterminal angle within the range of 0 to 2π radians:

-68π/9 + 2π = -68π/9 + 18π/9 = -50π/9

Since -50π/9 is still negative, we can continue adding multiples of 2π radians until we obtain a positive angle:

-50π/9 + 20π/9 = 70π/9

Therefore, the angle between 0 and 2π radians that is coterminal with -68π/9 radians is 70π/9 radians.

Learn more about radians here:

https://brainly.com/question/28990400

#SPJ11

The confidence level of the interval, extending from 0.399 to 0.501, is 95% with a 5% chance of not containing the true population proportion.

A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true population parameter. In this case, the population proportion represents the proportion of marketing students who rated resume inflation as unethical. The interval provided, extending from 0.399 to 0.501, is a 95% confidence interval.

A 95% confidence interval means that if we were to repeat the sampling process multiple times and compute confidence intervals each time, approximately 95% of those intervals would contain the true population proportion. It provides a measure of our confidence in the estimate based on the sample data.

The confidence level is determined by the choice of significance level (alpha), which is typically set at 0.05 (or 5%). This means that there is a 5% chance that the interval does not contain the true population proportion. Therefore, the remaining 95% represents our confidence level.

In summary, the confidence level of the given interval is 95%, indicating that we are 95% confident that the true population proportion of marketing students who find resume inflation unethical falls within the range of 0.399 to 0.501.

Learn more about Confidence intervals

brainly.com/question/32278466

#SPJ11

The mean function of Yt is constant over t.

Given the process {Xt, t ∈ Z} be a zero mean process.

Define Yt = {Xt Xt+1, even todd.

The statement that we need to determine if it is true or false is "The mean function of Yt is constant over t.

"Now, we will prove this statement is true or false.

The mean function of a process {Zt} is defined as follows;μZ = E[Zt]μZ denotes the mean function of a process {Zt}.

Here, the process {Xt, t ∈ Z} is a zero mean process.

Therefore,μXt = 0 for all t ∈ Z.

Substituting Yt = {Xt Xt+1, teven todd} into the above definition,

we get;μYt = E[Yt]

Using the definition of Yt, we get;μYt = E[{Xt Xt+1}]μYt = E[Xt Xt+1]

Since the process {Xt, t ∈ Z} is a zero mean process, we can write; E[Xt] = 0, E[Xt+1] = 0

Therefore, E[Xt Xt+1] = 0Thus,μYt = 0Therefore, the mean function of Yt is constant over t.

Hence, the given statement is True.

learn more about mean function on :

https://brainly.com/question/29631554

#SPJ11

The angle coterminal with -252° between 0° and 360° is 108°.

To find the angle between 0° and 360° that is coterminal with the -252° angle, we can add or subtract multiples of 360° until we get an angle within the desired range.

Since the given angle is negative, we can add 360° to it repeatedly until we get a positive angle:

-252° + 360° = 108°

Therefore, the angle between 0° and 360° that is coterminal with the -252° angle is 108°.

Coterminal angles are angles that have the same initial and terminal sides but may differ in the number of complete revolutions made. In this case, by adding 360° to the given angle, we obtain an angle that falls within the desired range.

Learn more about angle coterminal
brainly.com/question/21384986

#SPJ11

The length of the rectangle is 6 units.

Let's assume that the length of the rectangle be "x" units. According to the problem, the width of the rectangle is 5 units less than its length, which means that the width of the rectangle is (x - 5) units.  Area of the rectangle is given as 24 square units, thus;

Area of a rectangle = Length × Width=> x(x - 5) = 24x² - 5x - 24 = 0 To solve for the length of the rectangle, we can use the quadratic formula. Thus, the value of x can be found using; x = [-(-5) ± √(-5)² - 4(24)(-24)] / [2(24)]x = [5 ± √601] / 48The value of x can be calculated as 6 or -4/3

Since the length of the rectangle cannot be negative, so the value of x will be; Length of the rectangle = x = 6 units

Therefore, the length of the rectangle is 6 units.

To know more about rectangle refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15019502
#SPJ11

Answer:

as a trapezoid, a rectangle, and two squares

The solved given equation is:

x = -8/7, x = 4/3

To solve the given equation (7x+8)(3x-4) = 0, we need to find the values of x that make the equation true. This equation is in factored form, where two expressions are multiplied together to equal zero. According to the zero-product property, if the product of two factors is zero, then at least one of the factors must be zero.

Set the first factor equal to zero and solve for x:

7x + 8 = 0

Subtracting 8 from both sides:

7x = -8

Dividing both sides by 7:

x = -8/7

Set the second factor equal to zero and solve for x:

3x - 4 = 0

Adding 4 to both sides:

3x = 4

Dividing both sides by 3:

x = 4/3

Therefore, the solutions to the equation are x = -8/7 and x = 4/3.

Learn more about equation

brainly.com/question/14686792

#SPJ11

There were 18 cookies left after my mother gave half of the remaining cookies to my grandmother.

To solve the problem, we first need to find out how many cookies were sold. We can do this by multiplying the total number of cookies by the fraction that was sold:

60 x 2/5 = 24

So, 24 cookies were sold. Next, we need to find out how many cookies were left after my mother gave half of the remaining cookies to my grandmother.

To do this, we first need to subtract the number of cookies that were sold from the total number of cookies:

60 - 24 = 36

Now we know that there were 36 cookies left. Half of these were given to my grandmother, so we can find out how many were left by dividing by 2:

36 / 2 = 18

Therefore, the value obtained is 18. There are 18 cookies left.

To know more about fraction refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/8482939#

#SPJ11

The range of x that satisfies the condition of neglecting the third-order term in the Taylor expansion of sin(x) is approximately -0.092 < x < 0.092. Within this range, the higher-order terms become increasingly negligible, making the first-order term a good approximation of sin(x).

The Taylor expansion of sin(x) to the third order is given by:

sin(x) ≈ x - (x^3)/6

To neglect the third-order term, we compare its magnitude to the first-order term. Let's denote the first-order term as T1 and the third-order term as T3. We want to find the range of x where |T3| < 1/600 * |T1|.

Substituting the expressions for T1 and T3, we have:

|x^3/6| < 1/600 * |x|

Simplifying this inequality, we get:

|x^2| < 1/100 * 6

Taking the square root of both sides and considering the positive values, we have:

|x| < sqrt(6/100)

Hence, the range of x that satisfies the condition is approximately -0.092 < x < 0.092. Within this range, the higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion of sin(x) are relatively small compared to the first-order term, indicating that the first-order approximation is highly accurate.

Learn more about Taylor expansion here:

https://brainly.com/question/33247398

#SPJ11