The Mckinsey report was assigned in 2018. It had many positive comments on the future of the oil and gas industry in 2025, forecasting high demand and growth.
However, the industry has experienced a downturn in 2020 due to the global economy’s slowdown and the Covid pandemic. Many companies have suffered setbacks from reduced demand and price collapses. The Mckinsey report’s accuracy is difficult to judge, as although the fact that the sector remained relatively strong prior to 2020 cannot be denied, the fact that it now faces significant difficulties means it is somewhat inaccurate.
One thing that is certain is that the industry must evolve and adapt if it is to survive in the future. With clean energy sources becoming more popular, the industry must focus on alternative energies if it is to remain a profitable and respected business.
To know more about Mckinsey report , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30759957
#SPJ4
Which of the following mother country-colony associations is INCORRECT?
a) Spain—Philippines
b) Britain—Burma
c) Netherlands—Brunei
d) France—Vietnam
e) Portugal—Timor
The incorrect mother country-colony association among the options given is: Netherlands—Brunei .During the colonial period, European powers were involved in establishing colonies in various parts of the world, to exploit resources, create markets for manufactured goods, and spread their religion and culture.(option c)
The mother country-colony associations are as follows: a) Spain—Philippines - This association is correct .b) Britain—Burma - This association is correct. c) Netherlands—Brunei - This association is incorrect.
The Netherlands did not establish any colony in Brunei. Instead, Brunei was a British protectorate from 1888 to 1984. d) France—Vietnam - This association is correct .e) Portugal—Timor - This association is correct. Therefore, option c) Netherlands—Brunei is the incorrect mother country-colony association among the given options.
To know more about British visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1550563
#SPJ11
what was the last of the muslim kingdoms in medieval spain?
The last of the Muslim kingdoms in medieval Spain was the Nasrid Kingdom of Granada.What was the Nasrid Kingdom of Granada.
The Nasrid Kingdom of Granada was a Muslim kingdom in Andalusia, Spain, from 1230 until 1492, when Granada was eventually conquered by the Catholic Monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella. Its name came from the Nasrid dynasty, which ruled the kingdom from 1230 until 1492.AD 1492 was when the Spanish finally drove the Muslims out of Granada. The Alhambra, a fortress and palace, is one of the last reminders of Muslim rule in Spain. The Nasrid Dynasty's most significant period of power was between 1238 and 1358.
To know more about Nasrid Kingdom visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29661253
#SPJ11
Question 6 of 10
The American Federation of Labor weakened during the 1920s in part
because:
The weakening of the AFL during the 1920s can be attributed to a combination of external factors such as anti-union sentiment, legal constraints, and economic conditions, as well as internal divisions within the labor movement. These challenges hindered the AFL's ability to organize and protect the rights of workers, leading to a decline in its influence and membership during that period.
The American Federation of Labor (AFL), a prominent labor union in the United States, faced several challenges during the 1920s that contributed to its weakening. Some key factors include:
1. Anti-Union Sentiment: The 1920s witnessed a rise in anti-union sentiments among employers, the government, and the public. The Red Scare and fears of communism led to increased hostility towards labor unions. This hostile environment made it difficult for the AFL to organize and mobilize workers effectively.
2. Legal and Political Constraints: The government, influenced by pro-business interests, enacted laws and policies that undermined the power of labor unions. The passage of anti-union legislation, such as the 1921 Emergency Quota Act and the 1922 Fordney -Mc Cumber Tariff Act, restricted immigration and protected domestic industries, limiting the AFL's ability to expand its membership base.
3. Economic Prosperity and Anti-Unionism: The 1920s was a period of economic prosperity and growth in the United States. Many workers experienced increased wages and improved working conditions, leading to a decline in labor militancy. Some workers became less inclined to join or support labor unions, weakening the AFL's bargaining power.
4. Lack of Industrial Unionism: The AFL primarily represented skilled workers and craft unions, which limited its ability to organize industrial workers. The rise of industrial production and mass production methods favored larger, industrial unions like the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), which emerged as a competitor to the AFL in the 1930s.
5. Internal Divisions: The AFL faced internal divisions and disagreements over strategies and priorities. Some AFL leaders advocated for a more militant approach and greater support for industrial unionism, while others favored a conservative and cautious approach. These divisions weakened the unity and effectiveness of the organization.
for more questions on economic
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ8
what was the magnitude of the 1906 san francisco earthquake
The magnitude of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake is estimated to be 7.8 on the Richter scale. It happened at 5:12 a.m. on April 18, 1906, and it lasted for about 45 to 60 seconds.
The earthquake was caused by the movement of the San Andreas Fault, which extends from northern California to southern California, making it the most powerful earthquake that has ever hit California. The epicenter of the earthquake was located offshore of San Francisco, but it caused widespread damage in the city, resulting in the loss of around 3,000 lives and destroying over 80% of the city's buildings.
The earthquake also led to a series of fires that caused further destruction and took several days to be extinguished, making it one of the worst natural disasters in the history of the United States .In conclusion, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake was one of the most devastating earthquakes in the history of California, with a magnitude of 7.8 on the Richter scale. It caused widespread destruction, fires, and loss of life, leaving a lasting impact on the city and the state.
To know more about earthquake visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31641696
#SPJ11
Who was the 14th president
Answer:
Franklin Pierce
Explanation:
Answer:Franklin Pierce 14th president
Explanation:born on November 23, 1804, in a log cabin in Hillsborough, New Hampshire. He was a sixth-generation descendant of Thomas Pierce, who had moved to the Massachusetts Bay Colony from Norwich, Norfolk, England in about 1634.
from 1990 to 2010, the public sector share of total output
From 1990 to 2010, the public sector share of total output decreased. This means that the private sector's share of total output increased over that period.
The public sector is made up of government-owned organizations and services that provide goods and services to the public. The private sector is made up of businesses that are owned and run by private individuals or companies for profit.
There are many factors that contributed to the decline in the public sector's share of total output during this time period. One major factor was the trend towards privatization, which involved transferring government-owned businesses and services to the private sector.
Another factor was globalization, which led to increased competition from foreign businesses and encouraged governments to reduce their involvement in the economy. Additionally, technological advancements allowed for greater efficiencies in the private sector, which helped it to grow at a faster rate than the public sector.
Overall, the shift towards a larger private sector and smaller public sector had both positive and negative effects on the economy. On the one hand, it led to greater efficiency and innovation in many industries. On the other hand, it also led to increased economic inequality and reduced access to public goods and services for many people.
To know more about private sector visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11503492
#SPJ11
what stopped the freedman's bureau from distributing land to former slaves?
The Freedmen's Bureau was the agency of the United States government that was established in 1865 to aid former slaves and distressed whites after the Civil War.
It attempted to offer assistance to newly emancipated slaves in their adaptation to freedom and to oversee labor contracts between landowners and laborers, among other things. However, the Freedmen's Bureau was not able to distribute land to former slaves. Here's why:The distribution of land to former slaves was not one of the Bureau's goals. It did, however, attempt to oversee labor contracts between landowners and laborers. It did not have the authority to give land to anyone, including former slaves. The Freedmen's Bureau was established to provide support and help in labor negotiations, medical treatment, and education to former slaves and poor whites living in the South. The Bureau was abolished in 1872 when Congress refused to renew its mandate.
To know more about Civil War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ11
Gold was ______ in the 1800s and today it is ________.
A) scarce, scarce
B) scarce, abundant
C) abundant, scarce
D) abundant, abundant
Gold was scarce in the 1800s and today it is abundant.
Therefore, the correct answer is: C) abundant, scarce.
Learn more about gold with the given link,
https://brainly.com/question/13574717
#SPJ11
Why did philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle object to democracy? They feared unscrupulous people could gain power by appealing to the emotions and prejudices of people. They feared that democracy would be overtaken by the rich They feared that democracies would be too weak to stand up to authoritarian governments No answer text provided.
Philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle objected to democracy because they feared unscrupulous people could gain power by appealing to the emotions and prejudices of people and also other mentioned options. So, option a, b and c is correct.
They feared that democracy would be overtaken by the rich. Furthermore, they feared that democracies would be too weak to stand up to authoritarian governments.
Aristotle's objections to democracy:
According to Aristotle, democracy is when the poor rule over the wealthy. He believed that those who had the most wealth and power were the most fit to rule. He claimed that democracy is inherently unstable because it does not reward those who are truly capable of ruling. Aristotle feared that democracy would eventually give way to tyranny.
Plato's objections to democracy:
According to Plato, democracy is when the people have too much power. He believed that democracy is inherently flawed because it encourages people to make decisions based on their emotions rather than on reason. Plato believed that democracy was inherently unstable because it encouraged people to make decisions based on their emotions rather than on reason. He believed that democracy would inevitably lead to tyranny if the majority of the people made decisions based on their emotions rather than on reason.
So, option a, b and c is correct.
To learn more about democracy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30466950
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Why did philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle object to democracy?
They feared unscrupulous people could gain power by appealing to the emotions and prejudices of people.
They feared that democracy would be overtaken by the rich
They feared that democracies would be too weak to stand up to authoritarian governments
No answer
We, therefore, conclude that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that right is not unqualified, and must be considered against important state interests in regulation. Which best states Justice Harry Blackmun’s position in Roe v. Wade?
a. The right to privacy has certain limits that must be recognized. b. The welfare of the state is more important than personal privacy.
c. The government is able to deny certain rights on a situational basis. d. The government is permitted to regulate rights according to law.
Justice Harry Blackmun's position in Roe v. Wade can be summarized as: a. The right to privacy has certain limits that must be recognized. Option A is the correct answer.
In the landmark case of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a woman's right to have an abortion falls within the realm of privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justice Blackmun, writing for the majority, stated that the right of personal privacy includes the decision to have an abortion.
However, he also acknowledged that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against important state interests in regulation.
In his opinion, Justice Blackmun outlined a framework known as the trimester system, which divided pregnancy into three trimesters. He argued that during the first trimester, the decision to have an abortion is primarily a private matter between the woman and her doctor, with minimal state interference.
However, as the pregnancy progresses, the state's interest in protecting potential life becomes more compelling, allowing for increased regulation of abortion in the second and third trimesters. Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
For such more question on privacy:
https://brainly.com/question/891961
#SPJ8
Answer: its a
Explanation:
Identifying Clauses
Instructor’s note 1: From here, you may need to reference sections "Comma After Introductory Material," "Comma Around Words that Interrupt the Flow of Thought," and "Comma Between Complete Thoughts" in Chapter 36 if you need additional explanation.)
Instructor’s note 2: Remember that unlike phrases which are missing a subject or a verb, or both, clauses always have both a subject and a verb. A main clause (a.k.a. independent clause) expresses a complete thought and can stand alone as a sentence. While a subordinate clause (a.k.a. dependent clause) contains a subject and a verb, it is not a complete thought and thus cannot stand alone as a sentence. To be part of a complete sentence, a subordinate clause must be attached to at least one main clause. Section 21.5 focuses on the three types of subordinate clauses: noun clause, adjective clause, and adverb clause. The type of subordinate clause is determined by how it functions within the sentence. Now complete the following activity.
Directions: Write the type of clause over each bolded clause--noun clause, adjective clause, or adverb clause. As you analyze each sentence, look at the cue words (that, who, which, because, what, etc.) that begin the clauses, and think about how the clauses function. Do they work as nouns, as adjectives, or as adverbs? To help tell the difference between adjective and noun clauses, try substituting "it" for the noun clause.
1. What the commencement speaker said put everyone in the audience to sleep.
2. When the lead guitarist shows up, the band will go on.
3. What to do with nuclear waste remains a major problem in the movement to build more nuclear power plants.
4. Try raising a chicken if you want a truly messy pet.
5. The police officer who pulled Professor Allen over for speeding was one of his former students.
6. Paul Simon, who began performing in high school, has had a successful musical career for over 40 years.
7. Marla thinks that John Travolta is a fine actor.
8. The elm tree that is leaning over my house concerns me.
9. The Milky Way galaxy, which contains our solar system, looks like a sprinkling of glowing dust in the night sky.
10. After we raced to get to the doctor’s office on time, we sat and waited for 45 minutes.
The purpose of this activity is to identify and classify the different types of clauses present in each sentence. By analyzing the cue words and understanding how the clauses function, we can determine whether they act as nouns, adjectives, or adverbs. This exercise helps improve our understanding of sentence structure and enhances our ability to construct and interpret complex sentences accurately.
What the commencement speaker said put everyone in the audience to sleep.Noun clause (functions as the direct object of the verb "put")When the lead guitarist shows up, the band will go on.Adverb clause (functions as an adverbial modifier of time)What to do with nuclear waste remains a major problem in the movement to build more nuclear power plants.Noun clause (functions as the subject of the sentence)Try raising a chicken if you want a truly messy pet.Adverb clause (functions as a conditional adverbial modifier)The police officer who pulled Professor Allen over for speeding was one of his former students.Adjective clause (modifies the noun "police officer")Paul Simon, who began performing in high school, has had a successful musical career for over 40 years.Adjective clause (modifies the noun "Paul Simon")Marla thinks that John Travolta is a fine actor.Noun clause (functions as the direct object of the verb "thinks")The elm tree that is leaning over my house concerns me.Adjective clause (modifies the noun "elm tree")The Milky Way galaxy, which contains our solar system, looks like a sprinkling of glowing dust in the night sky.Adjective clause (modifies the noun "Milky Way galaxy")After we raced to get to the doctor's office on time, we sat and waited for 45 minutes.Adverb clause (functions as an adverbial modifier of time)For more questions on Clauses
https://brainly.com/question/27892321
#SPJ8
In 25 words or fewer, describe one primary source and one secondary source you think would be useful when studying government and politics
Primary Source: A primary source that would be useful when studying government and politics is a government official's speech or a transcript of a political debate. These sources provide direct firsthand accounts of the thoughts, perspectives, and policies of those involved in the political process.
For example, a primary source could be a transcript of a presidential address where the leader outlines their government's agenda, discusses policy decisions, or addresses significant events or challenges facing the nation. This allows researchers to analyze the original intentions and positions of political leaders and gain insight into their governance strategies.
Secondary Source: A secondary source that would be useful when studying government and politics is a scholarly article or book written by a political scientist or historian. These sources provide an analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources and existing research on specific aspects of government and politics.
For instance, a secondary source could be a book that examines the historical development of a particular political system, analyzes the impact of specific government policies, or explores the dynamics of political institutions. Such sources offer a broader perspective, contextualization, and critical analysis of primary sources, helping researchers to understand the complexities and nuances of government and politics.
Both primary and secondary sources play complementary roles in studying government and politics. Primary sources provide direct evidence and insights into the actions and perspectives of political actors, while secondary sources offer analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of multiple primary sources to provide a broader understanding of the subject matter.
for more questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ8
Which of these words best describe the appearance of the prisoners? Select four answers. a. hungry b. content c. ill-treated d. exhausted e. relaxed f. suffering g. well-treated
The appearance of prisoners in a prison setting can be described using various adjectives, but the most appropriate ones are "hungry," "ill-treated," "exhausted," and "suffering." This is because prisoners are often subjected to malnutrition, abuse, and other forms of mistreatment that can leave them looking thin, tired, and in pain.
The appearance of the prisoners can be described using different adjectives. However, the most appropriate ones in this context are "hungry," "ill-treated," "exhausted," and "suffering."
In the context of a prison setting, prisoners often suffer various kinds of abuse and torture. In many cases, they are subjected to malnutrition and poor living conditions, which make them look thin and underfed.
The word "hungry" is therefore a fitting description of the appearance of prisoners in this context.In addition to suffering from malnutrition, prisoners are also subjected to ill-treatment, which can take various forms such as beating, torture, and other forms of abuse. The word "ill-treated" accurately describes the appearance of prisoners who have been subjected to such forms of mistreatment.
Furthermore, prisoners often spend long periods locked up in cells, which can be both physically and mentally exhausting. The word "exhausted" is therefore a fitting description of the appearance of prisoners who have been locked up for extended periods.
For more such questions on adjectives, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28664041
#SPJ8
In at least two paragraphs, discuss how federalism allows states to govern their own unique needs of their population and whether this quote still applies to the U.S. government today.
Answer:
Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between the national government and state governments. This allows for each state to govern their own unique needs of their population, which can vary greatly from state to state. For example, a state with a large agricultural industry may have different policies and regulations than a state with a large urban population.
The flexibility of federalism allows for states to tailor policies and laws to their specific needs and demographics. This can be beneficial in ensuring that the needs of each state's population are met and that the government is responsive to the unique challenges facing each state. However, federalism can also lead to inconsistencies and disparities between states, particularly when it comes to issues like healthcare and education.
The quote "laboratories of democracy" is often used to describe federalism in the United States. It suggests that each state serves as a testing ground for different policies and that successful policies can be adopted by other states or even the federal government. While this concept is still applicable today, there are concerns that federalism is being used to justify policies that are discriminatory or unconstitutional. Additionally, the pandemic has highlighted the challenges of a decentralized response, with states implementing vastly different policies and facing unequal access to resources. Overall, federalism remains a key component of the U.S. government, but its strengths and weaknesses must be carefully considered in order to ensure fair and effective governance.
Explanation:
Write one real life and interesting experience (a short story )
on blended learning for a student.
(maximum 5 to 6 sentences)
One of the most memorable experiences I had during this blended learning journey was when our class collaborated on a virtual project with students from a different country.
We were assigned to work on a research project about cultural traditions and had to conduct interviews and collect data. Through video conferences and online platforms, we connected with students from the other country and exchanged our findings and insights.
It was fascinating to hear their perspectives and learn about their unique traditions. The virtual collaboration not only enhanced our understanding of the topic but also broadened our global perspective and fostered cultural exchange.
It was an enriching experience that showcased the power of blended learning in connecting students across borders and promoting cross-cultural understanding.
Learn more about traditions
https://brainly.com/question/27992543
#SPJ11
What’s questions might historians ask about the role of culture through the world history
How did culture shape societies? How did cultural exchanges impact civilizations? How did cultural beliefs influence political systems?
Historians may ask several questions regarding the role of culture throughout world history.
How did culture shape societies? Historians might examine the influence of cultural practices, beliefs, values, and norms on the development of societies. This involves studying aspects like religion, language, social structures, customs, arts, and technology, and analyzing their impact on social, political, and economic systems.How did cultural exchanges impact civilizations? Historians would investigate the exchange of ideas, goods, and knowledge between different cultures, civilizations, and regions. They would explore the consequences of cultural interactions, such as the spread of religions, technological innovations, trade networks, and the formation of multicultural societies.How did cultural beliefs influence political systems? Historians could explore how cultural beliefs, ideologies, and philosophies shaped political systems and governance structures. They would analyze how concepts like democracy, monarchy, communism, or tribal systems were influenced by cultural values, power dynamics, religious ideologies, and social norms.By asking these and similar questions, historians gain insights into the intricate relationship between culture and world history, unraveling the ways in which cultural factors have shaped human societies and civilizations over time.For more such question on culture
https://brainly.com/question/514395
#SPJ8
what were the reasons colonist upset with the anahuac commander bradburn?
The colonists were angry with the Anahuac commander Bradburn for several reasons. Here are the reasons colonist were upset with Anahuac commander Bradburn:1. He mistreated the colonists.The Anahuac commander Bradburn mistreated the colonists in the area.
He subjected them to punishment, imprisonment, and even death without a proper trial. He went as far as to imprison those who opposed him in a makeshift dungeon that was very uncomfortable.2. He didn't listen to their grievances.Bradburn also refused to listen to the colonists' grievances and often turned a deaf ear to their requests. His harsh treatment of the colonists contributed to the discontent.3. He ignored the colonists' political rights.Bradburn disregarded the political rights of the colonists. He also taxed them unfairly, and they had no say in how their money was being spent.4. He was arbitrary.Bradburn was arbitrary in his behavior, and his methods were violent and unforgiving. He acted with impunity, which irritated the colonists, and he was difficult to talk to. In conclusion, the colonists were displeased with the Anahuac commander Bradburn due to the reasons discussed above.
To know more about colonists visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24571554
#SPJ11
Negotiation between union leaders and business management is called .
Negotiation between union leaders and business management is called collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining is a process of negotiation between representatives of a labor union (union leaders) and representatives of an employer or management.The purpose of collective bargaining is to reach a mutually acceptable agreement regarding terms and conditions of employment, such as wages, working hours, benefits, and workplace policies.The process typically begins with each side presenting their proposals and priorities.Negotiations take place through meetings and discussions, where both sides engage in dialogue, present arguments, and exchange information.The union leaders advocate for the interests and concerns of the workers they represent, while the business management focuses on the company's goals and financial considerations.Throughout the negotiation process, both parties may engage in compromise, making concessions to find common ground and reach a fair agreement.The negotiation may involve back-and-forth discussions, counteroffers, and sometimes the involvement of mediators or arbitrators to assist in reaching a resolution.
Once an agreement is reached, it is formalized through a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), which outlines the terms and conditions of employment for the unionized workers.
For more such question on collective bargaining
https://brainly.com/question/11819753
#SPJ8
Adam Smith believed that fair prices for goods are determined in a capitalist system
through competition between businesses.
by government regulation of businesses.
by setting limits on imports and exports.
through competition between consumers.
Adam Smith believed that in a capitalist system, fair prices for goods are determined through competition between businesses, according to his concept of laissez-faire. This philosophy advocates for minimal government interference in the economy. The competition among businesses in serving consumer desires regulates prices to ensure market stability.
Explanation:Adam Smith, known as the father of modern capitalism, believed in the concept of laissez-faire, where a system's operations should be allowed to function without interference. This is particularly in a capitalist system, where he asserted that fair prices are set through the direct competition between businesses.
This economic theory entails that businesses provide goods and services that meet the desires of consumers, while competition regulates prices to ensure they remain at a reasonable level conducive to market stability. It's not through government regulation, or set limits on imports and exports, and not through competition between consumers. Smith viewed this competition amongst businesses as the main regulatory force of the market and the key determinant of fair prices.
Learn more about Adam Smith's Economic Theories here:https://brainly.com/question/32270523
#SPJ12
Can someone please give me the purpose and bias of the “We’re fighting to prevent this” poster?
The purpose of the "We're fighting to prevent this" poster is to raise awareness and mobilize support, while bias is indeterminable without further information.
To accurately analyze the purpose and bias of a specific poster, it is necessary to have the visual representation or detailed description of the "We're fighting to prevent this" poster. Without the actual content of the poster, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive analysis. Posters are visual communication tools that convey messages, opinions, or aims through imagery, text, and design elements. The purpose of a poster can vary widely, from raising awareness about a specific issue to promoting a particular ideology or viewpoint. The bias of a poster refers to any intentional or unintentional slant or distortion in the presentation of information, often driven by the creator's perspective, beliefs, or agenda. The purpose of the "We're fighting to prevent this" poster is to advocate for a cause or issue and motivate viewers to take action. The poster aims to raise awareness about a particular problem or threat and to rally support for efforts to prevent it. It likely intends to evoke a sense of urgency and concern among the audience, urging them to join the fight against the depicted issue.Regarding bias, it is important to note that without specific information about the content or context of the poster, it is challenging to determine its exact bias. However, as with any communication medium, there is a possibility of bias. The poster might present a biased perspective by focusing on one side of the issue, omitting certain information, or using emotionally charged language or imagery to sway opinions. It is crucial for the audience to critically evaluate the message and consider alternative viewpoints to have a well-rounded understanding of the issue at hand.For more questions on poster
https://brainly.com/question/29381158
#SPJ8
P
Select the correct answer.
What is the most important reason for citing a source when quoting it directly?
Ο Α.
OB.
to make your work seem complete
OC.
to add more information to your work
OD. to pick ideas from different sources
to give credit to the source
Reset
Next
Answer: to give credit to the source
Explanation: plagiarism bad bad
the tokugawa regime in japan maintained formal diplomatic relations only with
The Tokugawa Regime in Japan maintained formal diplomatic relations only with China, the Netherlands, and Korea.
In 1603, Tokugawa Ieyasu was appointed Shogun, and this period marked the start of the Tokugawa Period. As a result, the Shoguns controlled Japan from 1603 until the Meiji Restoration in 1868, following which the Emperor regained his sovereignty. In addition, one of the most important diplomatic moves made by Tokugawa Ieyasu was to limit foreign trade to Nagasaki. He established trade links with China, the Netherlands, and Korea, as stated in the question. Furthermore, the Tokugawa Regime's foreign policy concentrated mainly on China. It was the only country that had long-term relations with Japan, spanning over a century, throughout the Tokugawa Period.
Japan's relationship with the Dutch and Koreans was significant but somewhat more sporadic. In conclusion, the Tokugawa Regime in Japan maintained formal diplomatic relations only with China, the Netherlands, and Korea.
To know more about Tokugawa visit-
https://brainly.com/question/13875750
#SPJ11
Question 5 of 21
Which of the following is the best definition of historiography?
OA. The study of me history of writing history
B. The study of the history of language
C. The study of the history of music
D. The study of the history of religion
The best definition of historiography is option A: The study of the history of writing history.
Historiography is the examination and analysis of how historical knowledge is created, recorded, and interpreted over time. It focuses on the methods, sources, and interpretations used by historians in constructing narratives about the past.Historiography involves studying the development of historical writing, including different approaches, methodologies, and perspectives employed by historians throughout history. It investigates the influence of political, social, cultural, and intellectual contexts on the production of historical accounts.By studying historiography, historians gain insights into the biases, limitations, and evolving nature of historical scholarship. They analyze primary and secondary sources, evaluate different interpretations, and engage in critical thinking to understand how historical narratives are shaped and changed over time.Correct option is A: The study of the history of writing history.
For more such questions on Historiography
https://brainly.com/question/28930107
#SPJ8
the spanish troops led by cortes were most critical of aztec
The Spanish troops led by Cortes were most critical of Aztec due to several factors. Firstly, the Aztec civilization was considered to be one of the most advanced civilizations in the world, which posed a threat to the Spanish Empire.
They were also one of the most powerful and wealthy empires, which made the Spanish eager to conquer them. Secondly, the Aztecs had a complex religious system, which included human sacrifice. This was considered barbaric by the Spanish, who saw themselves as a superior, Christian civilization. They used this as a pretext to attack the Aztecs and impose their own religious beliefs. Thirdly, the Aztecs had a system of tribute, which involved demanding goods and services from conquered peoples. The Spanish saw this as a form of exploitation and sought to put an end to it. Finally, the Spanish were motivated by the prospect of riches, particularly gold. They were determined to seize the Aztec treasures, which they believed were vast.
In conclusion, the Spanish troops led by Cortes were most critical of Aztec due to their perceived threat, religious differences, exploitation of conquered peoples, and the prospect of wealth.
To know more about Spanish Troop visit-
https://brainly.com/question/32415315
#SPJ11
Cattle were ______ in the 1700s and today they are _________.
A) scarce, scarce
B) scarce, abundant
C) abundant, scarce
D) abundant, abundant
Cattle were abundant in the 1700s and today they are abundant.
Learn more about cattle with the given link,
https://brainly.com/question/11457667
#SPJ11
In the 1960 presidential debate between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, a sample of individuals who watched the debate on television indicated that the number of viewers who believed Kennedy won the debate was much larger than the number who believed that Nixon won. This evidence has been used to support the idea that Kennedy's debate performance helped him win the election. It has been argued that this evidence is problematic because young people were more likely to already support Kennedy, and they were also more likely to watch the debate on TV, whereas older people were more likely to support Nixon, but also more likely to listen to the debate on the radio. If this critique is true, the sample of tv viewers suffers from which problem? Cluster error Non-response bias Systematic error Selection bias
The critique described in the question suggests that the sample of TV viewers suffers from selection bias.
Selection bias occurs when the process of selecting participants for a study or survey systematically excludes or includes certain groups, leading to a non-representative sample. In this case, the argument suggests that the sample of TV viewers was biased because younger people who were more likely to support Kennedy and watch TV were overrepresented, while older people who were more likely to support Nixon and listen to the debate on the radio were underrepresented.
This selection bias undermines the generalizability of the results obtained from the sample and raises concerns about whether the sample accurately reflects the overall population's views.
Learn more about Selection bias https://brainly.com/question/13996199
#SPJ11
The preceding two High Renaissance works by Raphael Sanzio and Leonardo Da Vinci, respectively, illustrate the use of linear, one-point perspective developed by Brunelleschi and explained by Alberti in the first half of the 15th century. True False
The given statement "The preceding two High Renaissance works by Raphael Sanzio and Leonardo Da Vinci, respectively" is True because Raphael's School of Athens features figures arranged according to linear one-point perspective principles.
In The Last Supper, Leonardo da Vinci used this same technique to render the apostles of Jesus in a believable three-dimensional form. Alberti is credited with codifying the techniques of linear one-point perspective in a treatise published in 1435.
The concepts of the vanishing point and horizon line he outlined enabled painters to simulate three-dimensional space on two-dimensional surfaces, resulting in a more realistic portrayal of scenes as compared to earlier medieval works of art. Subsequent masters of the High Renaissance, such as Raphael and da Vinci, used Leonardo's teachings to create their masterpieces.
To know more about Leonardo Da Vinci, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26946545
#SPJ4
1. Muslim
use random violence and murder to instill fear
2. Radicalized
follower of the Qur'an
3. Terrorists
describes one who has taken the religious or political stance to extremes
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
doesn't matter the terrorists can be from any community and radicalism can be seen everywhere in the world cause everyone considers their religion to be superior
which best describes the relationship between samurai and landowners/peasants
During the feudal period, samurai were the military nobility of Japan, while landowners were the wealthy lords who owned vast amounts of land.
Peasants, on the other hand, were the farmers who worked on the land. The relationship between samurai and landowners/peasants was that of feudalism, in which samurai provided protection to the landowners, who, in turn, provided them with land, food, and other resources. The peasants worked the land and paid taxes to the landowners, who then paid a portion of those taxes to the samurai in exchange for their protection. The samurai held a high position in the Japanese society, and they were loyal to their lords, who in turn were loyal to the emperor. This system of feudalism was prevalent in Japan until the Meiji Restoration of 1868, when it was abolished. The samurai lost their power and privileges, and Japan moved towards modernization and westernization.
In conclusion, the relationship between samurai and landowners/peasants was one of feudalism, in which the samurai provided protection to the landowners, who provided them with land and resources, and the peasants worked the land and paid taxes to the landowners.
To know more about Feudalism visit-
https://brainly.com/question/33534890
#SPJ11
which of these does George Williams described as waging unjust and cruel wars against the native people of Congo?
Based on the information provided, it is not clear who George Williams is and which specific context or historical events are being referred to. Without additional information, it is difficult to determine which entity or group George Williams accused of waging unjust and cruel wars against the native people of Congo.
