theres nothing given for the question
The economy of the US in the 80s
What was the causes, course and consequences of the population boom in the sun belt states
Answer:
The population boom in the Sun Belt states, which include states such as Florida, Texas, Arizona, and California, was driven by a variety of factors. Some of the primary causes of the population boom include:
Climate: The Sun Belt states have a warm and sunny climate, which attracts retirees, vacationers, and individuals seeking a better quality of life.
Employment Opportunities: The Sun Belt states have been experiencing significant economic growth, which has created job opportunities and attracted workers from other regions.
Affordable Housing: The Sun Belt states have lower housing costs compared to other regions, which has made them attractive to people seeking more affordable homes.
Migration: The Sun Belt states have been receiving significant migration from other regions in the US and from other countries, which has contributed to their population growth.
Explanation:
The course of the population boom in the Sun Belt states has been marked by significant demographic changes. The population of these states has become more diverse, with significant increases in Hispanic and Asian populations. Additionally, the growth has led to the development of new cities and urban areas, which has transformed the landscape of the region.
The consequences of the population boom in the Sun Belt states have been both positive and negative. On the positive side, the growth has stimulated economic development and job creation, providing opportunities for residents. Additionally, the growth has contributed to the cultural diversity of the region, creating a vibrant and dynamic environment.
why did the german managed to colonize Tanganyika strong resistance from the people
Answer:
the uprising lasted for two years and involve people over 10,000 square miles
Explanation:
the maji maji uprising in Tanganyika was the most significant African challenge to German colonia rule during the brief period when german has Africa colonies
30 POINTS
trace the course of the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 to the present.Present both sides of the argument of supporters and those who opposed the movement
Note that the Women's Movement since 1877 has undergone several changes. supporters argue for equal right and opportuniteis oponnets argue against social and cultural changes.
What was the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 about?Following the war, women renewed their campaign throughout the Reconstruction period (1865-1877), emphasizing voting as the means to achieving larger rights and changes. Black and white reformers came together to seek universal suffrage, which included voting rights for both women and African American males.
The objective of the early women's rights movement contained much more than just the ability to vote. Their broad objectives included equal access to school and work, marital equality, and a married woman's right to her own property and salary, custody of her children, and control over her own body.
Learn more about women's rights movement:
https://brainly.com/question/461813
#SPJ1
Answer the questions from the station materials.
1. A politician running for re-election who is already in office is known as an incumbent.
2. Over 80% of the time, incumbents win re-election to the House and Senate, with a relatively high percentage of incumbents doing so.
3. The high percentage of re-election for incumbents is due to several factors. He has a track record, name recognition and fundraising advantage. Additionally, incumbents have the power to use their position to aid residents, which has the potential to boost their popularity and make it more difficult for competitors to win voters.
4.The graph shows that incumbents invest more money in their election campaigns than challengers. Incumbents typically spend $3,000, while challengers typically spend $2,800.
5. Candidates had several options for raising money for their election campaigns, including contributions from private citizens, PACs, and party organizations. Although it is less frequent, candidates can also finance their campaigns with their own money.
Learn more about incumbents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31478528
#SPJ1
This is for a History class, and the answer has to be in two paragraphs long.
Topic: Cultural
Describe your cultural identity and how it plays a role in your academic pursuits. Or, what are you doing to help eliminate barriers for others? Please be specific in your answer. Consider items such as: Have you had challenges because of cultural barriers? Have you had successes? What would you like to do to educate others about cultural differences?
A particular group or society's shared beliefs, habits, practices, values, and traditions are referred to as its cultural identity. It is a crucial component of both personal and societal identity, affecting how people view themselves and one another as well as how they interact with the outside world.
The way that people approach learning and the kinds of knowledge and skills they prioritize are shaped by their cultural identity, which is significant in academic endeavors. Students from various cultural origins, for instance, could learn differently or prefer various teaching philosophies. They might also contribute fresh viewpoints and life experiences to the classroom, which can enliven lessons and foster greater comprehension.
The behaviors, values, beliefs, and symbols that a group of people adopts—often without giving them much thought—and which are transmitted from one generation to the next through communication and imitation make up its culture.
Learn more about cultural identity here:
https://brainly.com/question/31576950
#SPJ1
Laissez-faire economics and antitrust acts were:
© A. unlikely to be supported by the same person.
B. hallmarks of the Populist Party platform.
O c. vocally supported by the robber barons.
• D. designed to rein in businesses that grew too large.
Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.
What effects on the economy did laissez-faire have?Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.
Antitrust laws are intended to control what.Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.
Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ1
5. What actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state? (1 point)
O Republicans became more liberal.
O The Democratic party became more liberal.
O Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party.
O Most liberal Republicans joined the Democratic party.
Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party such actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state. The correct option is C.
The Republican Party, which was viewed as being more conservative on topics like civil rights and states' rights, began to gain support from many conservative Democrats in Texas in the 1950s. This signaled the start of Texas' transformation into a competitive two-party state from a largely Democratic one-party state.
The Democratic-Republicans were made up of many factions that placed an emphasis on state and local rights, agrarian interests, local and humanitarian issues, and democratic processes.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about Democratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ1
The Byzantine Empire gained the most territory in the
A. sixth century, when Justinian I was emperor.
B. fourth century, during the reign of Constantine.
C. ninth century, after the Iconoclast Controversy.
D. thirteenth century, after the Crusades.
I decided to repost since this question wasn’t correctly answered for most threads.
Just download the pdf and use control find to make the exams open book. It’s the 6th century when Justinian I was emperor.
The Byzantine Empire gained the most territory in the A. sixth century, when Justinian I was emperor. The Option A.
Which century did the Byzantine Empire gain most territory?The Byzantine Empire under Emperor Justinian I in the 6th century gained the most territory in its history. His military campaigns reconquered much of the western Mediterranean basin which inclues Italy, North Africa, and parts of Spain.
These territories had previously been lost to the Byzantines and their reconquest significantly expanded the empire's power and influence. His territorial gains were accompanied by a period of cultural and intellectual flourishing because he sponsored the construction of magnificent buildings such as the Hagia Sophia and the Codex Justinianus.
Read more about Byzantine Empire
brainly.com/question/12887188
#SPJ1
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(06.04 LC)
Which of the following is an example of a Buddhist shrine?
O Pyramid
O Longhouse
O Stupa
Ziggurat
4
Question 5 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(06.011 C
This passage, written by economist David A.
Wells in 1889, describes changes to work during the Industrial Age. The modern manufacturing system has been brought into a condition [similar] to that of a military organization, in which the individual no longer works as independently as formerly, but as a private in the ranks, obeying orders, keeping step, as it were, to the tap of the drum, and having nothing to say as to the plan of his work, of its final completion, or of its ultimate use and distribution. In short, the people who work in the modern factory are, as a rule, taught to do one thing -to perform one and generally a simple operation; and when there is no more of that kind of work to do, they are in a measure helpless. The result has been... [the destruction of] the pride which the workman formerly took in his work... What is one result of the changes described in this passage?
Workers were paid more as their values to companies increased.
Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
Workers became more loyal to companies who rewarded their creativity.
Workers were celebrated for their individual skills, and the need for labor unions declined.
Based on the passage, the result of the changes described is that workers became more interchangeable and were taught to perform only one simple operation. This led to the destruction of the pride that the workman formerly took in his work. Therefore, the correct answer is: Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
Explain why the people of the Middle Ages would not have used that term?
Assuming that the term in question is related to a modern concept or technology, the people of the Middle Ages would not have used that term because they did not have the knowledge, technology, or cultural context necessary to conceive of or use that term. The Middle Ages, also known as the Medieval period, lasted from the 5th to the 15th century, and was characterized by feudalism, the rise of Christianity, and the absence of many modern technologies and concepts. Many modern scientific, political, and cultural ideas and inventions did not exist during this time, so it is unlikely that the people of the Middle Ages would have used or understood them in the same way that we do today. Additionally, the languages and vocabularies of the Middle Ages were different from those of modern times, which further limits the likelihood that they would have used or understood the same terms we use today.
PLS HURRY TIMED!!! Hume felt that causal claims were the most valid.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
he does not believe in cause and effect and was skeptical of
Question 1 of 10
Which statement best describes the circumstances surrounding the Voting
Rights Act of 1965 extension?
OA. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act and refused to
sign the extension, causing the law to lapse.
OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed
the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
C. President Reagan was a strong supporter of the Voting Rights Act
and worked with the NAACP to sign the extension into law.
D. President Reagan repealed the Voting Rights Act and cut off
funding to agencies that were supposed to enforce it.
Answer:
The correct answer is OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
President Reagan initially opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 extension, but he signed it into law after public pressure from the NAACP. The NAACP argued that the law was still necessary to protect the voting rights of African Americans. Reagan signed the extension, but he also called for reforms to the law.
IF CORRECT BRAINEST!!
Put the following in the order they occurred. This is an all or nothing question. A few have been provided for you in the Road to the Civil War Timeline.
Answer:
#1 Missouri Compromise
#2 Compromise of 1850
#3 Fugitive Slave Act
#4 Uncle Tom's Cabinn
#5 Kansas-Nebraska Act
#6 Bleeding Kansas
#7 Dred Scott vs. Sanford
#8 Lincoln-Douglas Debates
#9 John Brown's Raid
#10 Lincoln Elected President
#11 Southern Secession
Late, but, hope it helped! :)
So, brainliest? Please.
The highway department built a highway from the mainland United States to Alaska. Which of the following does this represent?
A.
reshaping the land through the normal life cycle
B.
reshaping the land through biological activities
C.
reshaping the land by returning essential materials
D.
reshaping the land through technology
Use this passage to answer the following question:
The Cotton Gin
Andrea Brecheen
The cotton gin was one of the most amazing and tragic inventions of early America. The cotton gin is credited to the brilliant and creative American inventor Eli Whitney. Because Whitney's invention made cotton harvesting easier, it allowed farmers in the South to increase production. The cotton gin simplified the process of removing the cotton from the seeds, a process formerly done by hand.
As a result, Southern plantations increased their production of cotton from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales just 20 years later. Because of the increase in production, the farmers in South became even more dependent on cotton for revenue. This new reliance on cotton increased the need for slavery. More slaves were needed to farm the ever expanding cotton plantations. If Whitney had known the effects his invention would have on slavery, he never would have created it.
Which of the following would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin?
Examples of other inventions that affected slaves' lives
Information related to the life and times of Eli Whitney
Stories of the first time people saw the cotton gin working in the field
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin . Option D is correct .
Who is Whitney?The cotton gin's most well-known inventor was Eli Whitney, but he was also known as the father of the mass production method. He figured out how to machine-make muskets in 1798 so that the parts could be swapped out.
Although the invention of the cotton gin made it easier to remove seeds, it did not eliminate the need for slave labor to grow cotton and pick it. Actually, the opposite took place. Enslaved people demanded a lot more land and enslaved labor because cotton farming was so lucrative for them.
Whitney never would have invented it if he had known how his invention would affect slavery.
To learn more about cotton gin visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9738066
#SPJ1
according to this map, which two groups of people were settled on lands to the WEST of the thirteen british coloniee
Answer:
French
Indians
Explanation:
Correct me if I'm wrong!!
Explain two similarities shared by mining and oil wells in KS?
Answer:
Explanation:
Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Answer:
Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Which of the following best describes how the Supreme Court decides cases?
Answer:
The Supreme Court decides cases through a process involving multiple steps and considerations. The best description of how the Supreme Court decides cases is as follows:
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and its primary role is to interpret the Constitution and ensure the law is applied correctly. When deciding cases, the Supreme Court follows a set of procedures and considerations, which include:
Granting Certiorari: The Supreme Court selects cases it will hear by granting certiorari, which is a formal request for a lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court for review.
Oral Arguments: Once a case is accepted, the parties involved present their arguments before the Supreme Court justices during oral arguments. This allows the justices to ask questions and engage in a dialogue to gain a deeper understanding of the legal issues at hand.
Examination of Briefs and Records: Prior to oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices review briefs submitted by the parties, which summarize their legal arguments and relevant case law. They also examine the lower court records to understand the factual background of the case.
Deliberation and Opinion Writing: After oral arguments, the justices deliberate among themselves to discuss the case and exchange views. They then proceed to write opinions, which explain the reasoning behind their decision. These opinions can take the form of majority opinions, concurring opinions, or dissenting opinions.
Decision Making: The Supreme Court's decision is reached through a majority vote among the justices. The decision sets a precedent and becomes the law of the land, guiding future legal interpretations.
It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decision-making process can be influenced by various factors, such as legal precedents, constitutional principles, public policy considerations, and individual justices' legal philosophies. The Court aims to ensure fairness, uphold the rule of law, and make decisions that align with the Constitution and the best interpretation of the law.
6.06 war on the bank
Based on Andrew Jackson's perspective, he would have opposed establishment of a national bank and so, opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
What was the Andrew Jackson's perspective on the cases?The McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to define the scope of the legislative power that Congress had and how it related to legislatures power. He would opposed establishment of national bank and hence would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
Gibbons v. Ogden was case where Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce should be granted to the Congress. President Jackson would have opposed the ruling which said expanded Congress's power to cover interstate commerce.
Read more about McCulloch v. Maryland
brainly.com/question/729429
#SPJ1
pls help me with history i’ll give u brainlist
Since Sputnik was an artificial satellite (the world's first), it had no direct effect on athletics. It definitely did not foster cooperation between the US and USSR, but actually led to a competitive space race to prove each country's superiority over the other. There was no need to send nuclear missiles into space, so C. is just wrong. The correct answer is D. it prompted a space race between the U.S. and U.S.S.R.
KEY OUEsTION: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT,OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISH NATION BY THE NAZI GERMANY DURING THE PERIOD 1933 TO 1946?
Between 1933 and 1945, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party ruled Germany, turning it into a dictatorship. This period of time is known as Nazi Germany. Germany under Hitler swiftly developed into a totalitarian nation where the government had control over almost every area of daily life.
The advent of fascism in Europe, the defeat of Germany in World War One, and the German racialist (völkisch) movement in the nineteenth century all contributed to the development of the political philosophy known as nazism.
Learn more about Nazi Germany here:
https://brainly.com/question/10076234
#SPJ1
Complete answers!
Thanks
The reasons for the rise of imperialism are as follows.
Commercial Revolution: Production significantly increased as a result of the industrial revolution in European nations. National security: .In terms of nationalism.. Power dynamics:. Discovery of new routes: .Population expansion:. Anarchy in the State:
Imperialism is the practice, ideology, or attitude of extending or preserving power, especially through expansionism, using both hard force (economic and military strength) and soft power (cultural and diplomatic power), establishing or maintaining a . National security hegemony, and creating or maintaining a more or less formal empire.
One prominent, frequently synonymous, but distinct form of imperialism has been colonialism, which concentrates imperialism on the more or less formal distinction between metropolitan and colonial life, people, and lands
Learn more about imperialism, from :
brainly.com/question/1225474
#SPJ1
what is the difference between the city of Babylon and the story?
The city of Babylon was a real historical city located in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq), founded in the 3rd millennium BCE. It was an important cultural and political center in ancient times, and it was famously known for its impressive walls and the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, which were considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
The story of Babylon, on the other hand, refers to the biblical story of the Tower of Babel. According to the story, the people of Babylon attempted to build a tower that would reach the heavens, but God caused them to speak different languages, causing confusion and leading to the abandonment of the tower. The story is often interpreted as a warning against human arrogance and the dangers of trying to reach too high.
In summary, the city of Babylon is a historical place, while the story of Babylon is a religious or mythological tale that is often used to convey a moral lesson.
~~~Harsha~~~
Which of the following organizations came into being as a result of the American involvement in conflicts in the Middle
East?
A.Al Qaeda
B.the KGB
C.the United Nations
D.the League of Nations
Al Qaeda of the following organizations came into being as a result of the American involvement in conflicts in the Middle East. The correct option is A.
As a result of American engagement in Middle Eastern conflicts, particularly the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s, an organization known as Al Qaeda was born. The KGB is the former Soviet Union's intelligence service, and it has nothing to do with the Middle Eastern conflicts. The League of Nations and the United Nations are multinational organizations designed to uphold world peace and cooperation; they have nothing to do especially with American engagement in Middle Eastern crises.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Al Qaeda here:
https://brainly.com/question/10449607
#SPJ1
Why were the Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful?
a. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
b. They appealed to the business owners' morality.
c. They won the support of the President.
d. They appealed to religious feelings.
Answer: A. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
Use the primary source on Jefferson Davis's First Inaugural Address to answer the question.
Regarding the new Constitution of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis said: "It makes clear their well-known
intent. It is free of the regional conflicts that interfered with our rights."
What did he mean by this?
O The framers of the Constitution intended that states could secede if their rights were restricted.
The Founding Fathers intended that citizens had the right to own property, including enslaved
people.
O Federal laws should only be followed if they do not conflict with existing state laws.
O Westward expansion should include territory where enslavement is allowed
Jefferson Davis meant that the new Constitution of the Confederacy was free of regional conflicts that interfered with their rights.
This suggests that the Confederacy believed that their rights were being infringed upon by the federal government, particularly in regards to slavery, and that the new Constitution was designed to protect those rights. It implies that the Confederacy believed that regional conflicts had prevented the proper recognition of their rights in the previous Constitution.
Jefferson Davis meant that the new Constitution of the Confederacy was free from conflicts between different regions that had previously interfered with their rights. In other words, the new Constitution was intended to unify the Southern states and establish clear guidelines for their secession from the United States. Davis believed that the regional conflicts that had existed in the past, particularly over the issue of slavery, had caused friction between states and impeded the Confederacy's ability to protect its interests. By creating a new Constitution that was free of these conflicts, Davis hoped to establish a more cohesive and united Confederate government.
To know more about Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes.
Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miro had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction.
Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
Social, Historical, and/or Cultural Origin
Briefly describe the Cultural Origins and/or the Social and Historical relevance of your selected artwork
Website:
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.69660.html
Answer:
The Farm, painted by Joan Miró in 1921, has cultural origins that are deeply rooted in the artist's personal history and the region of Catalonia, where he spent his summers. Miró was deeply attached to his native Catalonia and its culture, and this is reflected in the painting. The Farm can be seen as a representation of the rural Catalan landscape and its traditional way of life, which was under threat at the time due to rapid industrialization and modernization.
At the same time, Miró had moved to Paris in 1920 to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital, which was also a period of cultural and artistic ferment in Europe. The painting reflects the influence of the cubist movement in its formal vocabulary, but also shows a tendency towards abstraction and simplification of forms. This blending of traditional rural Catalan culture with avant-garde European artistic movements is a hallmark of Miró's work.
Overall, The Farm represents a complex fusion of personal, cultural, and artistic influences that reflects the historical and social context of early 20th century Europe. It can be seen as a statement on the changing nature of Catalan society and the tension between tradition and modernity, as well as a reflection of the broader artistic and cultural movements of the time.
This question concerns the pretrial process and procedures related to bail, and recent bail reform efforts and might require some additional outside research. While there is no Constitutional right to bail, the 8th Amendment explains that "excessive bail shall not be required." In an effort to reduce the number of defendants detained in jail prior to trial, some states have implemented minor changes to bail, while states such as California, New York, and New Jersey have made major changes and eliminated money bail for all crimes, though typically requiring violent felonies to still undergo normal bail proceedings. Should more states follow California, New York, and New Jersey and make similar major reforms to bail for non-violent felonies and lesser offenses, or are minor reforms, or no reforms at all the better course of action. Be prepared to defend your answer and research the issue to acquire more information if necessary.
The choice of whether to enact substantial, modest, or no reforms at all in the bail system is a difficult one that necessitates careful evaluation of a number of variables, including public safety, individual rights, and financial expenses.
What is bail reform?The term "bail reform" refers to initiatives taken to remedy issues with the criminal justice system's current bail system. Bail is the sum of money a defendant must pay in order to be freed from custody before a trial. Bail reform proponents contend that the present bail system unfairly punishes low-income defendants who are unable to pay bond and are consequently held until trial, frequently for protracted periods of time.
On the one hand, proponents of significant bail reform contend that the current system unfairly punishes low-income defendants who are unable to pay bond and are consequently imprisoned pretrial, frequently for long periods of time. Many adverse effects, such as losing one's job, home, or familial ties, may result from this. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that, regardless of guilt or innocence, pretrial imprisonment is linked to increased percentages of guilty pleas and lengthier sentences.
Many bail reform backers also contend that substitutes for cash bail, like pretrial programs, risk assessment instruments, and community supervision, can be more successful in ensuring that defendants appear in court while also minimizing needless pretrial detention.
Taxpayers are also burdened by the enormous cost of pretrial confinement; estimates indicate that it costs more than $14 billion yearly to hold criminals before trials.
On the other hand, opponents of significant bail reform contend that completely abolishing money bail can put the public at risk since it removes a crucial tool for ensuring criminals show up in court and deterring escape. People of color, individuals with mental health or substance addiction disorders, and other groups may be unfairly discriminated against, according to some, and risk assessment methods and community monitoring may be untrustworthy and unreliable.
In the end, to find the best strategy, more analysis of current policies and study may be required.
To know more about bail reform, visit:
brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ1
