According to the information, models and scientists come together like this: Geocentric system - Ptolemy; Heliocentric system - Copernicus.
What is the Geocentric model?The geocentric theory is a term to refer to an astronomical theory in which it is believed that the Earth is located at the center of the universe, and that the stars, including the Sun, revolve around the Earth.
Who was the greatest representative of geocentrism?The maximum representative of the geocentric theory was Claudius Ptolemy, who in the second century published his Almagest in which he introduced a geocentric system. This model was in force until the 16th century.
What is the heliocentric model?Heliocentrism is a term to refer to the astronomical theory in which it is believed that the Sun is located at the center of the universe, and that the stars revolve around it.
Who was the greatest representative of heliocentrism?The maximum representative of the heliocentric theory was Nicholas Copernicus, who in the 16th century published his work "revolutionibus orbium coelestium" where he exposes his ideas and his model of orbit around the Sun.
According to the above, the scientists would be organized as follows:
Geocentric system - PtolemyHeliocentric system - CopernicusLearn more about heliocentric system in: https://brainly.com/question/3491738
#SPJ1
Answer: According to the information, models and scientists come together like this: Geocentric system - Ptolemy; Heliocentric system - Copernicus.
What is the Geocentric model?
The geocentric theory is a term to refer to an astronomical theory in which it is believed that the Earth is located at the center of the universe, and that the stars, including the Sun, revolve around the Earth.
Who was the greatest representative of geocentrism?
The maximum representative of the geocentric theory was Claudius Ptolemy, who in the second century published his Almagest in which he introduced a geocentric system. This model was in force until the 16th century.
What is the heliocentric model?
Heliocentrism is a term to refer to the astronomical theory in which it is believed that the Sun is located at the center of the universe, and that the stars revolve around it.
Who was the greatest representative of heliocentrism?
The maximum representative of the heliocentric theory was Nicholas Copernicus, who in the 16th century published his work "revolutionibus orbium coelestium" where he exposes his ideas and his model of orbit around the Sun.
According to the above, the scientists would be organized as follows:
Geocentric system - Ptolemy
Heliocentric system - Copernicus
Explanation:
"To what expedient, then, shall we finally resort, for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the several departments, as laid down in the Constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate, the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places."
-Publius (James Madison), Federalist No. 51, 1788
Which of the following statements best summarizes Madison’s argument?
Choose 1 answer:
Choose 1 answer:
(Choice A) The structure of the government itself should limit its powers
A
The structure of the government itself should limit its powers
(Choice B) The current structure of government is defective
B
The current structure of government is defective
(Choice C) Most methods for controlling government are inadequate
C
Most methods for controlling government are inadequate
(Choice D) Government should keep people in their proper places
D
Government should keep people in their proper places
help asap
Can someone help me plz
Answer:
The video is unresponsive, maybe try sending it again.
Maps can show more than the view out your window such as
Answer:
All of the above.
Explanation:
trust me.
Describe the perspectives of the major stakeholders for Exxon Valdez Case Study .--for example, scientific, economic, aesthetic, or societal--and analyze how these perspectives have influenced how the issue has been addressed.
The perspectives of major stakeholders in the Exxon Valdez Case Study include scientific, economic, aesthetic, and societal viewpoints.
Scientific stakeholders are concerned about the environmental impact of the oil spill, studying its effects on wildlife, ecosystems, and long-term consequences. Economic stakeholders focus on the financial implications, including the cost of cleanup, compensation, and damage to the fishing industry. Aesthetic stakeholders emphasize the visual and cultural impact, as the pristine Alaskan coastline was marred by the oil spill. Societal stakeholders encompass the general public and local communities, who express concerns about health, tourism, and the loss of livelihoods.
These perspectives have influenced how the issue has been addressed. Scientific findings have led to increased regulations and safety measures for oil tankers, along with improved spill response strategies. Economic stakeholders have pushed for compensation for affected parties and stricter liability rules for corporations. Aesthetic concerns have driven efforts to restore the damaged areas and raise public awareness about environmental conservation. Societal pressure has prompted changes in corporate responsibility and corporate social responsibility initiatives.
In summary, the perspectives of scientific, economic, aesthetic, and societal stakeholders have shaped the response to the Exxon Valdez Case Study, leading to environmental, regulatory, and societal changes.
Read more about stakeholders on:
brainly.com/question/24432365
#SPJ11
please hurry
Which act was eventually repealed due to the boycotting of British goods?
Stamp Act
Quartering Act
Declaratory Act
Sugar and Molasses Act
Answer:
stamp act
Explanation:
.............
Answer:
The Quartering act is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Queen Mary I of England is called “Bloody Mary” because
Answer:
Queen Mary I of England is called "Bloody Mary" because she persecuted protestant heretics by burning them at the stake.
Explanation:
why is France and England still fighting until this day
Answer:
Hi Todo here!!!
Explanation:
England and France became entangled in the War of Austrian Succession, which became known as King George’s War (1744-1748) in North America. Fort St. Frederic served as a military base for French assaults into New England and New York, which intensified in the fall of 1745
Yw!!!
Answer:
The French and Indian War was fought to decide if Britain or France would be the strong power in North America. France and its colonists and Indian allies fought against Britain, its colonists and Indian allies. ... France had sent traders and trappers to these territories and had established trading centers there.
Explanation:
im being timed hurry!! What was the cause of the Second Crusade?
Seljuks took control of the settlement of Edessa.
Seljuks stopped allowing visits to the Holy Land.
Crusaders founded more settlements in the Holy Land.
Crusaders took control of the city of Jerusalem.
Answer:
The Second Crusade was started in response to the fall of the County of Edessa in 1144 to the forces of Zengi. The county had been founded during the First Crusade (1096–1099) by King Baldwin I of Jerusalem in 1098. While it was the first Crusader state to be founded, it was also the first to fall.Answer:
The Second Crusade was started in response to the fall of the County of Edessa in 1144 to the forces of Zengi. The county had been founded during the First Crusade (1096–1099) by King Baldwin I of Jerusalem in 1098. While it was the first Crusader state to be founded, it was also the first to fall.
Pls help!
Worth points!
Answer:
1. A
2. D & E
3. C
4. G
5. F
These are the answers. I hope it helps!
Answer:
a
d and e
g
f
Explanation:
those are the locations of each
Give a brief summary of the Marbury vs. Madison case and it's outcome. (3-5 sentences)
Answer:
1 print : engraving. The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
Explanation:
How were European immigrants treated during the Gilded Age?
Answer:
Most immigrant groups that had formerly come to America by choice seemed distinct, but in fact had many similarities. Most had come from Northern and Western Europe. Most had some experience with representative democracy. With the exception of the Irish, most were PROTESTANT. Many were literate, and some possessed a fair degree of wealth.
Explanation:
Why did the Spanish use "Tejas" to name the Hasinai Indians? a. Because the Hasinai were friendly to the Spanish. b. Because the Hasinai were located in Texas. c. Because the Hasinai were excellent guides who located Fort St. Louis. d. Because the Hasinai helped Spain defeat Fort St. Louis.
Answer:
Option a. is correct
Explanation:
Spanish use "Tejas" to name the Hasinai Indians because the Hasinai were friendly to the Spanish. The name of Texas comes from the Spanish word "taysha," that means "friend". Spanish officials heard about the kingdom ''Tejas'' late in the 17th century. ''Tejas" became the 28th state of the United States.
Answer:
Option a. is correct
Explanation:
Spanish use "Tejas" to name the Hasinai Indians because the Hasinai were friendly to the Spanish. The name of Texas comes from the Spanish word "taysha," that means "friend". Spanish officials heard about the kingdom ''Tejas'' late in the 17th century. ''Tejas" became the 28th state of the United States.
please help!! will give brainliest!!! seriously in need of help lol!
In two to three paragraphs, define checks and balances and explain their importance in the American government. For each branch of government (legislative, executive, and judicial), identify at least one check that branch has on the other two branches and explain its importance.
Answer:
Checks and Balances ensure that the American Government does not give total power to one branch. Coined by Montesque, an elightenment thinker during the American Revolution, checks and balances means that each branch is given a specific power over another (checks) and another branch has a specific power over it (balances).
The legislative branch has a check over the executive and judicial branch because the White House or Supreme Court can not propose laws. However, the executive branch has a balance over the legislative because the president can veto any law. The judicial branch also has a balance over the legislative because the Supreme Court can rule any law unconstitutional.
PLEASE HELP ME THIS IS THE LAST ONE!!!
Answer:
I believe the answer is the Columbian Exchange.
Explanation:
Which of these important events happened last? A: American Revolution B: Storming of the Bastille C: Execution of the King D: Execution of the Queen
Answer is B :
Storming of the Bastille
actully i am not sure just conform from other source too
Select all that apply
What were the expectations placed upon citizens when in 1631 the citizens of Boston organized a night watch?
1. That participation was voluntary
2. that participants would be selected for the night watch by a vote of all citizens
3. that eligible men would participate
4. that they would feed and house anyone who was serving on the night watch at no cost
Answer:
that participants would be selectedfor the night watch by a vote of all citizens
That participants would be selected for the night watch by a vote of all citizens and That participation was voluntary were the expectations placed upon citizens when in 1631 the citizens of Boston organized a night watch. Hence, option A and B is correct.
What is participation was voluntary means in this statement?In order to safeguard the wellbeing of its citizens by warning them of potential danger, the town of Boston founded the Nights Watch in 1631. It was left to the populace to secure their own protection because membership in the Nights Watch was voluntary.
This wasn't always the case, though, as the town occasionally had to take action to ensure that the Nights Watch had employees because there weren't enough people willing to volunteer. This included employing individuals who had broken town ordinances as well as enlisting conscripts to defend the town.
Thus, option A and B is correct.
For more details about participation was voluntary , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11671510
#SPJ2
How did the end of World War I impact the Middle East?
How did it contribute to modern terrorism? Explain in detail and
support your position.
The end of World War I resulted in the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the division of its territories among European powers. This created resentment and instability in the Middle East.
The end of World War I had a significant impact on the Middle East. It resulted in the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the division of its territories among European powers, including France and Britain, through the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This division created resentment and instability in the Middle East, as it disrupted long-standing cultural, religious, and ethnic groups. The region's boundaries were drawn arbitrarily, with little regard for the people who lived there. This led to a widespread feeling of dissatisfaction and disillusionment with the new order.
Additionally, the Middle East was stripped of its natural resources and left to fend for itself in a volatile geopolitical landscape. The resulting instability and political turmoil created a breeding ground for extremist groups and terrorist organizations, which capitalized on the region's disenfranchisement and the resentment of the people. Therefore, the end of World War I contributed to modern terrorism by sowing the seeds of instability and creating a sense of resentment that has led to extremist ideologies and violence in the region.
To know more about the World War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11330321
#SPJ11
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell decision we discussed as an example of the resolution of a circuit split, Justice Scalia wrote the following in his dissenting opinion (italics in original): "...This Court...consists of only nine men and women, all of them successful lawyers, who studied at Harvard or Yale Law Schools. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them grew up in the east and west coast states. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. Not a single South-westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). Not a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans), of even a Protestant of any denomination. The strikingly unrepresentative character of the body voting on today's social upheaval would be irrelevant if they were functioning as judges, answering the legal question whether the American people had ever ratified a constitutional provision [on the question at issue]. But of course the Justices in today's majority are not voting on that basis; they say they are not. And to allow the policy question [at issue] to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation." Explain whether you agree or disagree with this restrictive view of federalism and the role of judges in our common law system.
Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion reflects a restrictive view of federalism and emphasizes the importance of representation in decision-making processes. He criticizes the composition of the Supreme Court, suggesting that the lack of diversity among the justices in terms of background, geography, and religious beliefs could undermine the legitimacy of their rulings, especially in cases involving social issues.
This perspective raises broader questions about the role of judges in interpreting the law and shaping social policy. Some may agree with Justice Scalia's view, arguing that judges should strictly adhere to a textual interpretation of the Constitution and defer to the democratic process to address social issues. They may believe that unelected judges should not be making decisions that have significant societal impact without a broader representation of perspectives.
On the other hand, proponents of a more expansive view of federalism and the judicial role argue that the Constitution is a living document, subject to interpretation and adaptation over time. They contend that judges have a duty to protect individual rights and liberties, even if it means interpreting the Constitution in ways that may not align with the specific intent of its framers. They emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary in safeguarding minority rights and preventing the tyranny of the majority.
The debate over the role of judges in the common law system and the boundaries of federalism is complex and multifaceted, with different perspectives and interpretations. It ultimately reflects differing views on the balance between democratic processes, the protection of individual rights, and the proper role of the judiciary in shaping societal values and norms.
To learn more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ11
Help pleaseis do in 5 minutes NEED HELP ASAP
Answer:
Have you tried looking up the answers online and try reading?
Early sacred music is almost always in ___ while early secular music is usually in ___ Latin; a vernacular language. A vernacular language; Latin. Latin; French. French; Latin
Early sacred music is almost always in Latin, while early secular music is usually in a vernacular language.
During the early period of music history, sacred music, primarily associated with religious rituals and liturgical practices, was predominantly composed and performed in Latin.
Latin was the language used in the Roman Catholic Church and held significant religious and cultural importance. Composers of sacred music aimed to create works that were universally understood and accessible across different regions and countries, hence the use of Latin as a standardized language for religious texts and chants.On the other hand, early secular music, which encompassed various forms of non-religious songs and instrumental compositions, was often written and sung in the vernacular language of the specific region or country. This allowed secular music to reflect the cultural and linguistic diversity of different communities. By utilizing the vernacular language, composers and performers could connect with their audience on a more personal and relatable level, conveying themes of love, daily life, storytelling, and other secular subjects in a language understood by the local population.Therefore, early sacred music predominantly utilized Latin, while early secular music embraced the vernacular language to capture the essence of regional culture and communicate with the broader community.
For more questions on sacred music
https://brainly.com/question/32156640
#SPJ8
what group of colonist were responsible for such actions as the Boston Tea Party the Boston massacre in the stamp act rebellion
This Greek mathematician was known for his work in geometry and physics. The Greek army used two of his inventions: the catapult and the mirror system. Egyptians later used a screw system
that bears my name to Irrigate the Nile River Valley. Who am I?
Answer:
Archimedes
Explanation:
In the Nile, there is a place called Archimedes' Screw.
Hope this helped!
The Greek mathematician is Archimedes. The Nile contains a location known as Archimedes' Screw.
Who was Archimedes?Archimedes of Syracuse was a Greek mathematician, physicist, engineer, astronomer, and inventor who was born in the Sicilian city of Syracuse. Although little is known about his life, he is regarded as one of classical antiquity's leading scientists.
Archimedes' other mathematical accomplishments include deriving an approximation of pi, defining and investigating the spiral that now bears his name, and devising a system for expressing very large numbers using exponentiation.
He was also a pioneer in applying mathematics to physical phenomena, establishing hydrostatics and statics. Archimedes' achievements in this field include proving the principle of the lever, popularizing the concept of center of gravity, and enunciating the law of buoyancy.
To learn more about Archimedes
https://brainly.com/question/9479174
#SPJ5
ILL MARK BRAINLIEST!! (it’s not D) Which was a major source of controversy for President Andrew Jackson?
his support of expanded voting rights
the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears
his upbringing west of the Appalachians
the appeal to the public during his campaign
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears
14. Why did Spain agree to finally finance Columbus's voyage after seven
years?
A. They were worried that the English would be them to the New World.
B. The Pople gave them permission to take Catholicism to the New World.
C. In hopes of making Spain wealthy by setting up coffee plantations in the New
World.
D. To catch up with the wealth of the Portuguese
Answer:
D. To catch up with the wealth of the Portuguese
Explanation:
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain agreed to fund his voyage because they believed that if a whole new sea route was to be discovered that landed in the Indies it would help Spain have the upper hand in the competition against Portugal.
plz mark brainleist
help me with this question
Answer:
1st
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes the reign of Queen Victoria?
A. She was intimately involved in government affairs and often used her political power in Parliament.
B. She embraced a strict code of morals and manners that came to embody the values of the time period.
C. She was feared and despised by the common people, but admired by the nobility.
D. She offered hope and inspiration during a time of uncertainty and little confidence in the future.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
D: incorrect. Great Britain was very wealthy at the time, and the monarch was really a figure head.
C: Wrong. She was neither feared nor despised. She was very concerned about doing her duty.
A: Incorrect. She did not have the power to interfere with the government.
B: She had a strict moral code. Answer.
which of the following transaction are not recorded in book keeping
Answer:
add some more information to help me and other people trying to help you
Explanation:
What are three disadvantage
that the
child farm workers face?
name two scenarios where the Jews where persecuted other than world war 2
Answer:
they were punished for nothing so all scenarios
Case Study: Carol And Bob You Are The New Human Resource Manager Of The U.S. Postal Service Mail Processing Unit In New York. You Have Conducted A Review Of Your Department And Found An Environment That Is Highly Regulatory. Much Of The Work Is Routine And Offers Limited Upward Mobility. You Reviewed The Department Practices And You Have Found That There Is
Case Study: Carol and Bob
You are the new human resource manager of the U.S. Postal Service mail processing unit in New York. You have conducted a review of your department and found an environment that is highly regulatory. Much of the work is routine and offers limited upward mobility. You reviewed the department practices and you have found that there is a higher than average number of quits. Also, you identified that there have been over 16 workplace violence incidents reported. Three of them have occurred under the processing manager. You determine that several managers have not attended the workplace violence training in a number of years. You recognize that there is no sensitivity training offered by the HR unit. As you are completing your assessment you receive a call from a processing manager.
The processing manager reports that his employee, Carol, came to his office on Monday and reported that she is going through a separation and it will likely result in a divorce. She reports that her husband also works in the unit. She explained that she is concerned that her husband might try to interfere with her job. The processing manager explained that he told Carol that he would change her shifts. He explained that he reassured the employee that he felt all would work out. Then he reported that the employee's husband, Bob, came to his office on Tuesday and demanded that his wife not be moved to another shift. He also reported the employee stated that his wife better not be paying any attention to any of the other guys in the unit. The processing manager reported that Bob used derogatory names to describe his wife. He reported that he told Bob, that if Bob would "man up" his wife would not be looking for attention somewhere else.
He told Bob to get out of his office. He said that Carol should be able to do whatever she wanted. He reported that Bob started to cry and that he told him just to get out. He said that he wanted you to know what had transpired as he is concerned Bob will try to call in sick and the processing manager is fully aware he is not ill. You look into Bob's work file and see that he was the former security guard of the unit.
What actions do you recommend as you process and analyze this case? What would you tell the Processing Manager?
Remember that you represent the organization. Carol, Bob, and the Processing Manager all have a stake in the outcome of your decision.
Are there issues that should be taken into consideration at this time or is the Processing Manager just being overly cautious? Please engage in active discussion
The Processing Manager's concerns should not be dismissed as mere caution. Given the history of workplace violence incidents, the personal situation of Carol and Bob, and the derogatory behavior displayed by Bob, it is crucial to address the issue promptly and take appropriate actions to ensure the safety and well-being of all involved parties.
In processing and analyzing this case, it is crucial to consider the well-being and safety of all parties involved while upholding the organization's values and policies. Here are the recommended actions and points to address:
1. Ensure Employee Safety: Given the reported workplace violence incidents and the concern raised by Carol about her husband potentially interfering with her job, it is essential to take the matter seriously. Employee safety should be a top priority.
2. Address the Processing Manager's Response: While the Processing Manager showed empathy towards Carol, his response to Bob's visit may not have been appropriate or effective in diffusing the situation. It is important to discuss the manager's behavior, ensuring that he understands the need for professionalism and respectful communication.
3. Assess the Risk: Conduct a thorough assessment of the potential risk that Bob's behavior poses to the workplace and to Carol specifically. Review the organization's policies on workplace violence and determine if any immediate actions need to be taken, such as involving security or law enforcement if there is a threat to safety.
4. Provide Support to Carol: Reach out to Carol privately to understand her concerns and offer support. Assure her that the organization takes her safety seriously and will take appropriate actions. Explore options such as providing resources for counseling or legal advice to help her navigate her personal situation.
5. Conduct Sensitivity and Workplace Violence Training: Recognizing the absence of sensitivity training and the outdated workplace violence training, it is crucial to develop and implement comprehensive training programs. These programs should address respectful communication, conflict resolution, and promoting a safe and inclusive work environment.
6. Communicate Policies: Reinforce the organization's policies on workplace conduct, non-discrimination, and harassment to all employees. Emphasize the consequences of violating these policies and encourage reporting any concerns or incidents promptly.
7. Investigate and Document: Initiate an investigation into the incident involving Bob's visit to the Processing Manager's office. Gather statements from witnesses, document the events, and maintain confidentiality throughout the process. Ensure that the investigation is fair, impartial, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
8. Take Appropriate Actions: Based on the findings of the investigation and the assessment of risk, take necessary actions to address the situation. This may include disciplinary measures for Bob if his behavior violated the organization's policies. Consider any necessary changes in work arrangements or shifts to ensure Carol's safety and peace of mind.
9. Monitor and Provide Ongoing Support: Establish a system to monitor the situation and provide ongoing support to Carol and other employees. Encourage open communication, and make resources available for employees to report any concerns related to safety or workplace issues.
To learn more about workplace violence refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32417105#
#SPJ11
