Answer:
aid to Greece → Truman Doctrine
CIA formed → intelligence gathering
Berlin Wall → construction of the wall by the Soviet Union
domino theory → justification for US involvement in Vietnam War
intelligence gathering → CIA formed
containment → US strategy to prevent the spread of communism
brinksmanship → US strategy of pushing dangerous situations to the brink of war to force the other side to back down
why did the revolutionary war start
Answer:
1775
The Revolutionary War or the American Revolution, the war between Great Britain and its American colonies, 1775-83, by which the colonies won their independence.
What were the causes of the American Revolutionary War?A glance at the Declaration of Independence would show that there were other grievances beyond taxation. Among them:
jury trials were replaced with admiralty courts where the defendant was presumed guilty unless he could prove otherwise and his guilt was determined by a judge.colonial trade with European powers outside of the English Empire was forbidden.London reserved the power to limit what products Americans could manufacture.intense resentment over the growing presence of English troops in colonial America.the Proclamation of 1763 declared that colonists could not settle west of the Appalachian Mountains; this was particularly resented because many colonists had been awarded land beyond the Proclamation Line by the English government for their service in the French and Indian War.Parliament had suspended the New York Assembly until it agreed to impose certain taxes; with this precedent, it became clear that self-government was limited to what London permitted.Soldiers could search private property--homes, farms, offices, ships, etc.--without the necessity of a warrant.English soldiers were immune from arrest in Boston regardless of the crime they were accused of committing; instead they would face trial in England, where it would be difficult for colonial victims or witnesses to travel to testify.the Battles of Lexington, Concord, and Bunker Hill all occurred before the Second Continental Congress voted to declare independence. England had already commenced hostilities against the American colonies.George III (pictured below) spurned the olive branch offered by the First Continental Congress and chose to send troops rather than negotiators. By upbringing, temperament, and outlook, if war was to be avoided, he was the wrong King at the wrong time.Had Charles II (pictured below) been King, things would have likely been very different.
He would have sailed to America at the first sign of trouble. There, he would have delivered a lecture at Harvard on English history, laid a wreath at the graves of the victims of the Boston Massacre, gone shopping in Philadelphia, attended the theater in New York, and gone fox hunting with men from the most prominent families in Virginia.
By the time he would have departed, Charles would have been the most popular man in America. And he likely would have fathered a few children along the way.
The picture depicts a service provided through a
that
The picture depicts a service provided through a constituent policy that is funded by taxpayers
What is Constituent Policy?A constituent policy refers to a specific issue or area of focus that affects a particular group of people, such as a specific region, demographic, or interest group.
It is a policy that addresses the concerns and needs of a specific constituency. In relation to voting, constituent policies can play a significant role in influencing voters' decisions.
Candidates often develop and promote policies tailored to resonate with the concerns and interests of specific constituencies to gain their support and votes during elections. By addressing specific constituent policies, candidates can appeal to and mobilize key voter groups.
Read more about constituent policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/12170826
#SPJ1
4. The most common arrangements of cylinders are V-type, horizontally opposed,
and
O A. four-corner.
B. in-line.
O C. spiral.
D. circular.
Answer:
B. in-line.
Explanation:
People who vote privately without fear of coercion
People who vote privately without fear of coercion C. are able to express their political preferences freely without fear of reprisal.
Why is this important to democracy ?This is an essential right in a democracy, as it allows people to participate in the political process without fear of intimidation or harassment.
There are a number of ways to ensure that people can vote privately without fear of coercion. One way is to have a secret ballot, where voters mark their ballots in private and then place them in a sealed box. This prevents anyone from seeing how a voter has voted. Another way to ensure privacy is to have polling places that are located in secure and accessible locations. This makes it difficult for anyone to intimidate or harass voters.
Find out more on coercion at https://brainly.com/question/32174354
#SPJ1
The full question is:
People who vote privately without fear of coercion
A. are less able to express their political preferences freely without fear of reprisal
B. fail to express their freedom of political choice
C. are able to express their political preferences freely without fear of reprisal
eventually, the south Vietnamese government that the United States was committed to help, was revealed to be corrupt and anti-democratic T/F?
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The statement is true. The South Vietnamese government, which the United States supported during the Vietnam War, was indeed revealed to be corrupt and anti-democratic. The government, led by President Ngô Đình Diệm and later by President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu, faced criticism for its authoritarian rule, human rights abuses, and widespread corruption. These factors undermined its legitimacy and contributed to growing disillusionment among the South Vietnamese population. Ultimately, the government's lack of popular support and its inability to address grievances played a role in the outcome of the war.
Discuss the various competing plans that were proposed at the Constitutional Convention and the compromises that were included in the final document. What concessions did the Federalists make in order to win the Anti-Federalists' acceptance of the new federal government?
Loyalists tended to include all of the following groups EXCEPT: 1. Wealthy merchants 2. Smugglers and urban workers 3. Royal office holders 4. Enslaved and free African Americans
Answer:
3. Royal Office Holders.
Explanation:
Which sentence most clearly makes a logos appeal?
O A. Go ahead and elect my opponent if you want a known liar in office.
OB. As a doctor, I have seen many similar cases; this is nothing new.
OC. The members of the city council should be ashamed of
themselves.
O D. Evidence shows that four-day work weeks improve productivity.
SUBMIT
Option D. Evidence shows that four-day work weeks improve productivity.
In order to determine which sentence most clearly makes a logos appeal, it is important to understand what logos is and how it can be used in writing. Logos is a type of appeal in persuasive writing that uses logic and reasoning to support an argument or claim. It involves presenting factual information, statistics, and evidence to support a position and persuade the audience to agree with the writer's point of view. it this understanding, we can evaluate the four sentences given in the question:
A. Go ahead and elect my opponent if you want a known liar in office. This sentence does not make a logos appeal because it is an emotional appeal that uses scare tactics and name-calling to try to persuade the audience. There is no logical reasoning or evidence presented to support the claim that the opponent is a known liar.
B. As a doctor, I have seen many similar cases; this is nothing new. This sentence does not make a logos appeal because it is an appeal to authority, where the writer's credentials as a doctor are used to support their claim. However, there is no factual information or evidence presented to support the claim itself.
C. The members of the city council should be ashamed of themselves. This sentence does not make a logos appeal because it is an emotional appeal that uses guilt and shame to try to persuade the audience. There is no logical reasoning or evidence presented to support the claim that the council members should be ashamed.
D. Evidence shows that four-day work weeks improve productivity. This sentence makes a logos appeal because it presents factual information and evidence to support the claim that four-day work weeks improve productivity. The word "evidence" indicates that the writer has done research and gathered data to support their claim. This is a logical appeal that is based on objective information and is likely to persuade the audience to agree with the writer's point of view.
In conclusion, the sentence that most clearly makes a logos appeal is D. Evidence shows that four-day work weeks improve productivity. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about productivity here:
https://brainly.com/question/30407409
#SPJ8
What skills from a History course would you use to create a three-paragraph promotional tool that explains the value of a chosen product and a sales pitch aimed at individual buyers?
The conservation movement in the United state in the 1960s and 1970s called for
Answer: It focused its attention on pollution and successfully pressured Congress to pass measures to promote cleaner air and water.
Explanation:
In the 1960s and 1970s, the environmental movement focused its attention on pollution and successfully pressured Congress to pass measures to promote cleaner air and water. In the late 1970s, the movement increasingly addressed environmental threats created by the disposal of toxic waste.
Have a great day/night :)
How Serbia and France are related?
Answer: Both countries established diplomatic relations on 1839, between the French Third Republic and the Principality of Serbia. Both countries are members of the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the Partnership for Peace, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
What developments occurred in women’s suffrage in the United States during the Great War?
Answer:
During WWI, many jobs were left vacant because men left to fight the war. In order to keep these industries running, the jobs were often taken by women. This was unusual at the time, and it gave them a taste of independence. When the war was over, many of them were not happy to return to their previous position as housekeepers. They wanted to remain involved in the public sphere and the running of the country. One of the ways to achieve this was by winning the right to vote. Their role during the war also helped them demonstrate their abilities to contribute as members of society.
Explanation:
Question 6 (1 point)
As the Earth rotates, circulating air is deflected. Instead of circulating in a straight
pattern, the air deflects toward the right in the Northern Hemisphere and toward the
left in the Southern Hemisphere, resulting in curved paths. This deflection is called
the:
orographic effect
orographic lifting
coriolis effect
atmospheric pressure
The deflection caused in the air due to the rotation of the Earth is called the Coriolis effect. Thus, option C is the answer.
The Coriolis effect is a phenomenon that occurs due to the Earth's rotation. This effect describes the deflection that happens in an object which is moving in a rotating system such as the Earth's surface. The Coriolis effect has been applied in many fields like meteorology, oceanography, and navigation.
The Coriolis effect can be most seen in objects such as large-scale weather systems. Air currents, for example, appear to bend to the right in the Northern Hemisphere while air currents behave in the opposite way in the Southern Hemisphere where it bends to the left.
Thus, the apparent deflection seen in the circulating air is known as the Coriolis effect.
Learn more about the Coriolis effect, here:
https://brainly.com/question/21826324
Choose the best word or phrase from the drop-down boxes to complete each sentence. In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower took control of the to allow African American students to attend high school. Th of 1957. It gave the Department of Justice the power to stop Alabama Americans to Under the Indian Terminatio reservations and relocate to urban areas, where they often f they would into American culture. Virginia Arkansas e C 8 Oll Submit C hp M O Z National Guard and ordered the troops senhower signed the Civil Rights Act made it difficult for African O in Indians were encouraged to leave ion. The federal government hoped Jun 22 1:49 1 US
In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower took control of the National Guard to allow African American students to attend high school.
This action was in response to the Little Rock Nine crisis in Little Rock, Arkansas, where nine African American students were denied entry to a previously all-white school. By deploying the National Guard, Eisenhower enforced federal law and ensured the protection and equal rights of African American students.
Additionally, President Eisenhower signed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. This legislation aimed to address voting rights issues and provided the Department of Justice with the power to intervene in cases where individuals' constitutional rights were being violated. The act played a significant role in the broader civil rights movement and demonstrated the federal government's commitment to upholding equal rights for all Americans.
The overall goal of these actions was to promote racial integration and equality in the United States. Eisenhower's involvement and the signing of the Civil Rights Act were pivotal moments in the fight for civil rights and set the stage for further advancements in desegregation and equal treatment under the law.
For more such question on Dwight D. Eisenhower
https://brainly.com/question/1262961
#SPJ8
Answer:
see image
Explanation:
what happened after reagan administration loosened regulations on savings and loans institutions
Answer: After the Reagan administration loosened regulations on savings and loan institutions, Many S&Ls made bad loans and went bankrupt.
Bad loans and poor and risky practices were some of the effects that caused the regulations on savings and loan A good number of institutions had become engaged in risky lending practices and investments. Then the government would have to engage in bailouts as well as tighter regulations because they did not want to have an issue that is of the nature in the future
Explanation: YIPPPEE
Select the statements that you agree with.
Throughout history, people have always tried to find new and better ways of doing things.
Technology is usually met with skepticism.
Technology brings with it both good and bad effects.
Technological progress is inevitable.
Answer:
technology brings with it both good and bad effects.
I concur with all four statements - people always strive for improvement, technology progresses inevitably, it often faces skepticism, and has both good and bad effects.
Explanation:I agree with all four statements presented. Throughout history, humanity's desire to improve has been a driving force resulting in constant innovation and the development of new systems and procedures. Strong>Technological progress is inevitable as a reflection of this innate curiosity and striving for better. Skepticism towards technology is also a common thread, often stemming from a fear of unknown implications or perceived threats to traditional ways of doing things. On that note, it is important to understand that technology can have both positive and negative impacts on society, depending on how it is used. Therefore, it is crucial to approach technological progress with both optimism and caution.
Learn more about Technological Progress here:https://brainly.com/question/33446431
#SPJ2
At the end of Jefferson's second term it seems that the political situation should have made Jefferson's party very vulnerable in the next presidential election. Yet despite serious problems James Madison won the Presidency. How did Jefferson's popularity, the political ineptitude of the Federalists, and other factors help explain these results?
Again, do not simply summarize. Show your thinking, support your ideas with evidence from the reading the book “ American yawp “ chapter 7.
Jefferson's popularity, the political ineptitude of the Federalists, and the changing political landscape all contributed to James Madison's victory in the presidential election following Jefferson's second term. These factors, as supported by evidence from the reading of "American Yawp" chapter 7, shed light on the factors that shaped the political outcome during that period.
At the end of Thomas Jefferson's second term, his party, the Democratic-Republicans, faced several challenges that could have made them vulnerable in the next presidential election. However, a combination of factors, including Jefferson's enduring popularity, the political ineptitude of the Federalists, and the changing political landscape, helped explain James Madison's victory in the subsequent election.
Firstly, Jefferson's popularity played a significant role in securing the success of his party. Despite some controversies and challenges during his presidency, Jefferson remained a widely respected figure among the American public. His vision of a decentralized agrarian republic resonated with many citizens, and his accomplishments, such as the Louisiana Purchase, were widely celebrated. This popularity translated into support for his chosen successor, James Madison, who was seen as carrying on Jefferson's legacy.
Secondly, the Federalists, the main opposition party, faced political ineptitude and internal divisions that worked to the advantage of the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists were heavily criticized for their opposition to the War of 1812, which was popular among many Americans. Their perceived lack of patriotism and their inability to present a coherent alternative vision for the country weakened their appeal. Additionally, the Federalists' strong support for a strong central government clashed with the prevailing sentiment favoring states' rights and limited federal power.
Furthermore, the political landscape was shifting during this time, with the emergence of a new generation of leaders and the decline of the Federalist Party. Younger politicians like Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun began to shape the political discourse and align themselves with the Democratic-Republican Party. This rejuvenation of the party and the infusion of new ideas helped maintain its strength despite the challenges it faced.
for more questions on political
https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ8
Which of the following is NOT a reason the Soviet Union engaged in the Cold War?
Which of the following is NOT a reason the Soviet Union engaged in the Cold War?
America and Britain waited a long time to open a front in France
The Soviet Union believed in capitalism
The United States terminated Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union before the war was over.
Russia lost twenty million citizens during the war
Answer: C. The Soviet Union believed in capitalism
Explanation: The Soviet Union believed in capitalism is not a reason why the Soviet Union engaged in the Cold War. The Cold War was mainly a result of political and ideological differences between the Soviet Union and the United States, and the Soviet Union's desire to spread communism around the world.
Answer: B
Explanation: The Soviet Union believed in capitalism is NOT a reason the Soviet Union engaged in the Cold War.
viii.
What does IAU stands for?
Answer:
International Astronomical Union (IAU)
Explanation:
hope it helps you
Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal economic policies reversed which early political response to the Great Depression?
Which part of the agreement between President Kennedy and Khrushchev was kept a secret from the American people?
1. that the U.S would remove their missiles from Turkey
2. that there were missiles on the island of Cuba
3. that the Soviets would remove their missiles from Cuba
4. that the U.S promised not to invade Cuba
Answer:
It's D :)
Explanation:
Question 18 of 20: Select the best answer for the question. 18. Who played an important role in developing the second party system? A. Andrew Jackson O B. John Quincy Adams O C. Alexander Hamilton O D. Martin Van Buren O Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page) << Previous Question Type here to search Next Question >> E C
The correct answer is D. Martin Van Buren. played an important role in developing the second party system
Martin Van Buren played an important role in developing the second party system in the United States. He was a prominent political figure and a key organizer and strategist for the Democratic Party during this period.
Van Buren served as the eighth President of the United States from 1837 to 1841 and was known for his political skills and ability to build coalitions. He was a key architect of the modern Democratic Party, helping to shape its principles, organizational structure, and electoral strategies.
Van Buren's influence and leadership were instrumental in solidifying the second party system, which featured the Democratic Party and the Whig Party as the two major political parties during the mid-19th century.
for more questions on second party system
https://brainly.com/question/29100912
#SPJ8
Viewers of Manet’s Déjeuner sur l’herbe initially responded to its public display by attacking the canvas with their umbrellas. Why?
Answer:
The viewers of Édouard Manet's painting "Déjeuner sur l'herbe" initially responded by attacking the canvas with their umbrellas due to the painting's controversial subject matter and departure from traditional artistic conventions.
The painting, completed in 1863, depicts a n*de woman in a picnic setting with two fully dressed men. This subject matter challenged the societal norms and expectations of the time, which considered ndity in art acceptable only in certain historical or mythological contexts.
The viewers, who were accustomed to more traditional and idealized representations in art, found Manet's depiction shocking and offensive. The realistic portrayal of a nde woman in a contemporary setting went against the established artistic conventions of the period. The viewers felt a sense of moral outrage and considered the painting to be indecent and scandalous.
Their reaction, attacking the canvas with their umbrellas, was a physical manifestation of their disapproval and an attempt to censor the artwork. It was a direct response to what they perceived as a violation of moral standards and a challenge to the established artistic norms.
Over time, Manet's painting and the controversy surrounding it became an important moment in the development of modern art, as it challenged the traditional notions of subject matter and paved the way for new artistic movements. However, the initial hostile reaction reflects the conservative attitudes prevalent at the time and the resistance to change in the art world.
Explanation:
At the Berlin Conference in 1884-1885, European nations established rules for the division of Africa with little concern about how their actions would affect the African people. Which two countries claimed most of Africa?
Answer:
Britain (united kingdom) and france
Explanation:
Britain (United Kingdom): Britain claimed significant territories in Africa, including present-day Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, South Africa, Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), and Egypt, among others. The British Empire established a vast colonial presence across the continent.
France: France also claimed substantial territories in Africa, including present-day Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Chad, Gabon, Madagascar, and many others. The French colonial empire extended across different regions of Africa.
These two countries, along with other European powers, partitioned Africa into colonies or spheres of influence during the Berlin Conference, disregarding the wishes and interests of African peoples, leading to the exploitation and colonization of the continent.
features of Poroto- History
Answer:
It is feature of proto history
What are the demands of the Indian National Congress according to this document? Select all that apply.
an investigation into the actions of the Indian administration
evidence collected regarding the acts of the Indian administration
an investigation into the actions of the Royal Commission
getting rid of the Council of the Secretary of State for India
work on the reforms proposed by the Council of the Secretary of State for India
Answer: A , B , D
Explanation:
The Indian National Congress demanded an investigation into the Indian administration's actions, collection of evidence related to its conduct, and to commit to the reforms proposed by the Council of the Secretary of State for India. They also sought the elimination of the Council to achieve greater autonomy and accountability.
Explanation:The demands of the Indian National Congress posed to the British government, according to the given options, seem to include: a rigorous investigation into the actions of the Indian administration, evidence collection related to the conduct of the Indian administration, and a bold step toward the carefully measured work on the proposed reforms by the Council of the Secretary of State for India.
The Indian National Congress demanded reforms to create a more democratic governance system in India, and sought the discontinuation of the Council of the Secretary of State for India to establish more autonomy and accountability in the decision-making process.
Learn more about Indian National Congress here:https://brainly.com/question/12405238
#SPJ2
1. Suggest other ways historical inquiry skills might help your peers in their personal, professional, and academic careers.
Classmates' response - I have never been one to get caught up in media developments. I get my news from reputable sources, and almost always dig deeper into different sources to make sure the information matches. Researching my historical event has just made that instinct stronger. I now look more into the bias that certain media outlets may have on the topic I am reading or researching. I look for stronger secondary sources and read more into what I am researching, rather than skimming through. Getting some historical context is also more important to me now, because connecting with our past can help build a better future.
I try to find where my ancestors went wrong and in what ways I can improve the similar things we are going through today whether that be in my career, personal life, or my inclination to help people and our future.
How might someone's perspective
on the previous question be shaped
by that person's identity and his or
her personal values and
experiences?
An individual's identity, personal values, and experiences can significantly shape their perspective on any situation
Some ways in which these factors can influence someoneCultural and social identity: A person's cultural background and social identity can shape their perspective on various topics. Different cultures have distinct values, beliefs, and norms, which can influence how individuals perceive and interpret questions.
Personal beliefs and values: Each person holds a unique set of beliefs and values that guide their worldview. These beliefs can stem from religious, philosophical, or moral convictions.
Personal experiences: Personal experiences play a crucial role in shaping perspectives. Past experiences, whether positive or negative, can influence how someone perceives and responds to a question.
Learn more about personal values at
https://brainly.com/question/12318197
#SPJ1
Help please
Is it appropriate to write about and discuss the civil rights movement as a singular noun? Why or why not? Use at least three of the primary source documents to construct your response to this question.
Answer:
Yes, it is okay to refer to the Civil Rights Movement as a singular noun when writing and speaking about it. In order to achieve equal rights and put an end to racial discrimination in the United States, the Civil Rights struggle was a vast and complex social and political struggle. Despite the fact that several leaders, techniques, and points of view were involved, it is justified—as shown by primary source documents—to refer to it as a singular noun for a number of reasons.
First off, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)'s "Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam" underscores the interconnectivity of numerous conflicts, including the Civil Rights Movement. In truth, the text reads, "We are supporting the war with our taxes, our black and white manpower, and the tragic loss of human potential." The SCLC emphasizes the larger, unified fight against injustice and the shared objectives of many movements by connecting the Civil Rights Movement with the Anti-War Movement.
Second, the Civil Rights Movement was a collective effort, as demonstrated by Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" address during the 1963 March on Washington. King's eloquent speeches and vision of equality are in line with the movement's more general goals. He declares, "Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of racial segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice." King's statements serve as a reflection of the movement's overall goals and objectives, which were shared by both people and groups.
Thirdly, the "Eyes on the Prize" interview with eminent civil rights activist John Lewis emphasizes the solidarity and camaraderie of the struggle. With a focus on the shared commitment to achieve equality and justice, Lewis addresses the relevance of nonviolent protests, sit-ins, and freedom rides. We wanted to be free, he says. We desired the freedom to move anywhere we pleased and to live like humans. The experiences and goals of people active in the Civil Rights Movement are reflected in Lewis' testimony.
As a result, it is permissible to refer to the Civil Rights Movement as a single entity when writing about and discussing it because it stands for a concerted effort to advance equal rights and end racial discrimination. The primary source materials cited, such as Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech, the "Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam," and John Lewis' "Eyes on the Prize" interview, support the notion of a unified movement with shared objectives, struggles, and aspirations. The Civil Rights Movement's collective nature and the larger struggle for justice and equality are acknowledged when the movement is referred to as a singular word.
Explanation:
How did entering World War II change the U.S. economy?
a.
Less people worked since they did not know how to make materials for war.
b.
The U.S. had to rebuild their factories completely to change to making war materials.
c.
Factories changed their production focus to making war materials and ramped up productions.
d.
The U.S. government had no control over production and this led to a slower shift in making war materials.
